Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/05

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2024

01 May 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 21:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There were some recent unconstructive edits and this person was recently featured in a MrBeast video, so I believe it is necessary to add page protection to protect against vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:282:4700:272:1c2b:7fc:5531:c643 (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP edits since 22 March; particularly active today. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Warn the user appropriately"? I count at least three disruptive IPs over the past month.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 01:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which one?   –Skywatcher68 (talk) Skywatcher68 (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. At least 14 vandalism edits in the last 50 edits. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 23:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Fastily 23:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which one?   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link Roblox Developers Conference Under Events To: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roblox_Developers_Conference_(RDC) Thank You :) Icjunior1220 (talk) 00:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're not going to link a live article to a draft article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 03:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not doneFavonian (talk) 05:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove {{R to related topic}} from the redirect page (not the page that the redirect is pointing to). Rationale: This template is for mainspace only, and is causing the page to appear in Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace. I can't use {{sudo}} for this, because the talk page is also a redirect and I don't want to mess with it and potentially annoy the clerks. NYKevin 05:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 10:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Repeated addition of unsourced material. Thanks, 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 00:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBCOM CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 02:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GraziePrego (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @GraziePrego: The IP has been blocked for a long period since they have been damaging that article since February 2023. Let me know if further problems occur. Johnuniq (talk) 06:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – a new account pushing a non-notable person. The Banner talk 02:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full seems excessive. Semi would probably do it? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi would be an editorial decision to exclude the new editor. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @CanonNi: Let me know if further problems occur. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Thanks! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Mtarch11 (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Mtarch11 (talk) 06:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism. Once the page was protected for 1 month. After the time period got over, Again IP Vandalism Is happening please protect this for longer period of time. Because its political party page and this is highly sensitive. DavidThomas22 (talk) 06:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 12:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Abo Yemen 07:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Looks like the talk page is getting <1 disruptive or ECR-violating comment per day, on average. Can be handled by the editors/admins present. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection.Czello (music) 07:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. I partially blocked the range mainly responsible for the disruption for 72 hours. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:Gilberatalessandro054 has been engaging in repeated edit wars by putting copyrighted material into the topic and despite others making him aware (both on his talk page and in the edit reasons), he has continued with this. More detail here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Gilberatalessandro054_edit_warring_copyrighted_material_into_article. Matthew Wellington (talk) 10:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy tag to @GreenLipstickLesbian and @Wikishovel who have assisted removing the copyrighted material. Matthew Wellington (talk) 10:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Gilberatalessandro054 was pblocked indefinitely from that article. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page is under attack of an IP hopper. Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after protection expires. Request indef protection. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 10:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 10:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated misgendering. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some ip-adresses keep changing the cast-listings to the Dutch cast. Zombles - Talk to me 11:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 15:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Theres some other IP's too you didn't get@Joyous! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 May 2024

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 13:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting indefinite extended-confirmation protection for the page. The article was fully protected before today due to threats and vandalism, as part of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 13:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I restored indefinite semi-protection since the full protection expired. Semi wasn't automatically added back only for technical reasons. No comment on whether ECP is needed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers., as noted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined hopefully the block issued before this request will be sufficient to stop the disruption Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Israel-Gaza conflict, recent politics, etc. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 2400:1A00:BAA0:D007:60FB:93EB:569B:C2A9 (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: High level of IP and new ID vandalism as soon as previous protection expired Imsaneikigai (talk) 14:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: No reason this should be changed, keeps getting vandalized Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Per above Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: per above Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per above. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – per above. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: per above Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:07, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: ARBECR. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. And ARBECR Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Editors generally seem to be working things out. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: GS RUSUKR Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Levels of Vandalism due to political campaigns. 187.133.14.102 (talk) 15:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandals. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some wiki user disruptively editing his family background section again and again without any solid reason However He rapidly citing the list of sources except vanit nalwa and autar sandhu in which his family background mentioned khatri or anything else if it possible don’t try to undone an dispute topic,Also one more important thing you need to understand khatri source are much latter despite early sources mentioned him as non khatri you can through this snipshot This non-scholarly and non-independent source is authored by Vanit Nalwa, who is a neuropsychologist and hypnotherapist by profession. This is non-independent source, as she is a relative of the subject.So this is not reliable for Sikh history. For historical details, please cite scholarly sources authored by historians – see WP:SCHOLARSHIP and WP:HISTAR . Truthfindervert (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP user is persistently adding unsourced and factually inaccurate content. ZLEA T\C 17:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism for the past month, particularly hoax edits to his professional boxing record. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, especially given OJ Simpson just died. --164.64.118.99 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't really see a lot of IP vandalism, just good-faith edits that are being discussed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It bewilders me that this page is a target of vandalism. Golem08 (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 21:45, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -Fastily 22:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruption from 93* and 89* IPs and their account GuruRavidasPuttar. Page had been protected in the past but after it expired, the disruption has continued. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And will again log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP policy violations and persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Today's vandal stopped after their last warning, and otherwise the article doesn't seem to be getting a lot of disruption. Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IP users have attempted to add characters who do not appear or have been announced for the game, most notably Inside Out characters (likely due to a game mechanic involving memories from orbs that resemble the ones from the film). This has been a recurring issue with this article going back months. –WPA (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't seem to be overwhelming the article, though, and as I noted at AIV today's vandal stopped after being warned. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. I looked at the history in more depth and reconsidered. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page only came out of semi-protection on 29/04 and has already been subjected to vandalism by an IP today. TarnishedPathtalk 01:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Left CTOPS notice on talk page as well. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone has continually inserted Atrocitus after editors decided it does not belong in the article. This is usually done from a different IP address each time. This may be the same person who keeps inserting Emma Frost. Anita5192 (talk) 01:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 17:01, 5 February 2024‎. Panian513 03:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 02:57, 27 April 2024‎. Panian513 03:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 17:02, 5 February 2024‎. Panian513 03:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 17:05, 5 February 2024‎. Panian513 03:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target, with recent vandalism spree starting 17:05, 5 February 2024‎. Panian513 03:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 04:13, 24 February 2024‎. Panian513 03:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target, with recent vandalism spree starting 03:55, 22 February 2024‎, but disruption appears to date back to 15:06, 6 August 2022‎ at the earliest. Panian513 03:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 21:20, 17 May 2022. Almost every single edit in the past 150 edits on this page has been vandalism from one LTA and users reverting said vandalism. Panian513 03:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 03:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 02:59, 27 April 2024‎. Panian513 03:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 16:22, 10 February 2021‎. Almost every edit in the past 100 edits on this article has been vandalism and reverts of said vandalism. Panian513 03:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please re-report if disruption resumes afterward. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 04:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 05:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism/edit warring Zinderboff(talk) 04:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Raised from existing semi. Will add 1RR for when the autoconfirmed users reach EC level, and log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edits, should be indefinite. Idiosincrático (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has been a few years since protection has been needed, lets see what happens in a month before we reach out too far in the future. Dennis Brown - 12:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – harassment. CRBoyer 05:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that the IPv6 was blocked, but it's hard to really get the job done with just a block. Ping me if you need it longer after this expires. Dennis Brown - 12:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP promotional spam GraziePrego (talk) 05:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and blocked the IP for good measure since that is all they are doing. Dennis Brown - 12:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ping me if they come back after it expires. Dennis Brown - 12:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 194.132.8.40 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 12:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular vandalism by IP/new editors. Sanglahi86 (talk) 07:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 07:19, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Sutyarashi (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 39.35.0.0/16 (talk · contribs). One-year partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 13:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I feel this page is a candidate for "Semi" or "Pending changes" protection because it is a generally contentious topic, considering it includes a large "controversies" section, and could be the target of vandalism. Vandalism is not rampant but the last few hundred commits have at least a few reverts tagged for vandalism and the page seems to receive a lot of non-account edits. The edit logs also contains a decent number of edits that appear to be biased in tone along with edits trying to correct the language. Armeym (talk) 10:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 10:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Usama Ahmad rana (talk · contribs). as WP:NOTHERE instead. Let me know if you see them again, but I would rather just block the editor than protect at this stage. Dennis Brown - 12:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 11:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple new users adding incorrect information. He's announced that he's leaving his job in early 2025, but multiple new editors keep changing this to 2024 or changing present to past tense. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm seeing a couple bad IP edits and a couple of good ones. Protecting would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Not really enough activity to protect at this point, although that might change. Dennis Brown - 13:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changing this guys height twice a week for months, from multiple accounts. Nswix (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Kagan21 (talk · contribs). The IP was likely them, but that was well over a week ago. Blocked for 72 hours, lets see what that does. It might be helpful if you went to their user page and spent a paragraph calmly telling them they must have a new source in order to introduce new information that contradicts existing sources. At the very least, that demonstrates we tried to help them not get blocked again. Dennis Brown - 13:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 12:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 23.93.189.155 (talk · contribs). This time for a month. Favonian (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking section about the Forgejo fork. Ahri.boy (talk) 12:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 103.188.234.0/24 (talk · contribs). Three-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 13:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 14:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 15:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be some longstanding chicanery happening, look at the edit summaries, for example. Everyone reverting everything, people accusing each other of antisemitism, Dogs and Cats living together, etc. etc. -Samoht27 (talk) 15:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Those edits were made by this guy. --Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Albeit, only for a months. Favonian (talk) 16:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I made this request before ScottishFinnishRadish added page protection, this page protection is temporary though, and indefinite protection may be optimal. -Samoht27 (talk) 18:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it was an anti-vandalism template that was applied 10 years ago. My understanding is such protection should only be placed briefly, or long enough to deter the vandalism. Sadly the admin who placed the protection has their user page memorialized. 2A02:C7C:CC80:8200:AC18:DDD1:CC70:F1B6 (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UnprotectedFavonian (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, especially regarding gender identity. Currently gaining attention as the lead DYK on the Main Page. Rhain (he/him) 06:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently subjected to a significant amount of unconstructive edits, by what may well be the same person using different IPs. PatGallacher (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism/speculation editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopping Beshogur (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 16:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 176.255.141.43 (talk · contribs). Two weeks, this time. Favonian (talk) 16:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03 May 2024

Reason: page was protected indefinitely 2+ years ago for BLP violations; the page's subject was recently deceased at that time. the (sole?) offender was permanently blocked from editing. 173.175.200.238 (talk) 22:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Please notify me if we need to raise the protection level once again. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pachu Kannan (talk) 13:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. The article is being targeted as the film is to be released tomorrow. See version history. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 16:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi-protected through the opening weekend. BusterD (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi - protection: Persistent vandalism because subject of this article is very controversial. Pachu Kannan (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi - protection: vandalism and subject is now alleged is a very controversial sex scandal. Pachu Kannan (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I will, however, leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi - protection: This subject is also alleged in the same sex scandal. Pachu Kannan (talk) 17:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Will, again, put CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since mid-March, this talk page has been subjected to a flood of irrelevant contributions, mostly in Arabic. Unfortunately, there's no single IP range to focus on. Largoplazo (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article is the victim of low quality ip edits and edit wars for several weeks. Recently I have seen the act of the distortion of changing reliable source based information from a ip and I believe like previous weeks new edit wars are going to happen. The same thing happened in previous years where I had to request for page protection and the page was protected several times from lowest a week to maximum a month. Now there is a need to be protect the page for more period. Mehedi Abedin 17:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dennis Brown: Better to lock down this BLP due to recurring IP appearances which causing edit wars. --—Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP reverting to unsourced dubious claim Mangoe (talk) 19:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping anonymous editor that keeps removing a bit about a character being non-binary. Warnings to one of the addresses haven't worked. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, I was think of another article. This has been the same address so far. Not that warnings did work. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was requested over a month ago as well, due to the same type of vandalism. [1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – subject was recently cancelled. Launchballer 20:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stupid edit warring that's devolved into ad hominem. CRBoyer 23:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper is engaging in an edit war. Page should be protected to avoid further disruption. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editor. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:E126:3101:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from various IPs after prior protection lapsed. Same unsourced/unreliable additions as before. Longer protection would be preferred. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs adding unsourced personal info. Trivialist (talk) 00:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing despite repeated warnings to stay off my talk page. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:8003:E126:3101:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 00:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent campaign of IP vandalism. Has been protected previously on more than one occasion. The first edit after unprotection has been the same vandalism. IceBergYYC (talk) 01:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP editor. Would like to encourage Talk page discussion. Rotary Engine talk 02:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of non-constructive edits due to recent events. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Article this is about is protected per WP:ARBPIA and this discussion/article is quite closely tied to that conflict. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bbb23. for a week. This is an AfD ... it will not need indefinite protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose, but it's only semi'd and that's not sufficient here. Elli (talk | contribs) 03:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 03:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS under BLP since it is a related issue. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 07:22, 28 December 2023‎. Panian513 03:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 07:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 02:22, 28 April 2024‎. Panian513 03:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note, this has never been protected before. Dennis Brown - 07:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 03:00, 30 April 2024‎. Panian513 03:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 07:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 05:54, 23 November 2022. Panian513 03:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Matching last given protection. Dennis Brown - 04:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 16:30, 23 September 2022‎. Panian513 03:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Same, matching last protection level and duration. Dennis Brown - 04:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 20:45, 23 July 2021‎. Panian513 03:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 04:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 00:59, 22 October 2023‎. Panian513 03:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., hasn't been protected before. Dennis Brown - 04:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 14:30, 26 June 2020‎. Almost every edit in this article's history has been vandalism from LTA and reverts of said vandalism. Panian513 03:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Matching previous protection. Dennis Brown - 04:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 20:47, 23 July 2021‎. Almost every edit in this article's history has been vandalism from LTA and reverts of said vandalism. Panian513 03:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Dennis Brown - 07:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target since 19:56, 21 May 2022‎. Panian513 03:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 99% of edits for more than a year are unconstructive or reverting the unconstructive edits. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 07:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The two IPs are obviously the same person, and there is reason to suspect they may have a COI with the subject. The article hasn't been protected before. Being a BLP, I'm more willing to add some strong protection, where normally I would have blocked the editor for edit warring (as at least three different editors have reverted and been reverted by them). Unfortunately, when IPs are edit warring (and likely have a COI), and address and ranges can flip in an instant, we don't have a lot of tools to deal with the problems. Dennis Brown - 07:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm using as a primary user and I'm 18+ 50.84.22.183 (talk) 06:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This board is for requesting that protection levels be changed, and in this case, to "decrease" the level of protection. There is no protection on the page you have requested a review of. Anyone, including IPs, should be able to edit it, so there isn't anything for us to do. Dennis Brown - 06:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's been almost 20 years, so I think unprotection or at least semi-protection is reasonable. See also User_talk:Fish_and_karate#Request_for_unprotectionJustin (koavf)TCM 07:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is covered by Arb's Contentious Topics, not just a simple protection issue, via the target article Demographic history of Jerusalem, which was protected by Ymblanter about three years ago. Granted, this doesn't dictate the protection level of the redirect, but it still influences it. I would also question the wisdom of reducing the protection to semi (or removing it) given the current political environment. I wonder if this would need to go to AE or Arb anyway, because of the CT link, or be done as an AE action rather than simple admin action. I will leave to a 2nd opinion but I don't see this as a good idea. Maybe reducing to EC protection, but I can't possibly see going all the way to semi or unprotect. Dennis Brown - 07:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Way too controversial. If you want the redirect changed, an edit request is the correct approach. Favonian (talk) 10:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of newly registered WP:SPA's disruptive activity. Jingiby (talk) 14:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Darabald (talk · contribs). Also Konihprue (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted by Newboy78641 (talk · contribs) evading their block with IP-hopping edits. Paul Erik has been reverting their edits, and I have as well. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has attracted a trio of vandals today. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Thanks to Smalljim, the trio now sings in the heavenly choir. Favonian (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, reverting edits by WP:CBNG and engaging in 3RR edit war. BryceM2001 (talk) 16:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: TraceNothing (talk · contribs) blocked by Jauerback. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several vandals making the same sort of edit, although it may be one person spamming new accounts. miranda :3 18:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop disruption for years, probably decades. Would appreciate if this could get a lengthy protection. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. – WP:ARBKURDS. Favonian (talk) 19:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject has been indicted by the FBI on bribery, money laundering, and conspiracy charges. High level of IP vandalism. Water Bottle Lvr (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Exactly two IPs have edited this article since January 2024. Can you point out which edits by those IPs constitute a "high level" of vandalism? OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 19:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced content and making unnecessary changes [2] [3] [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 May 2024

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Zippo9310 (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ip was blocked now same disruptive editing from different address Aeengath (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2405:9800:bc30:49e7::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 19:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 20:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, defamation, security issues due to mentioning of a nuclear scientist details, no mentioning of relation with father, posing threat to his security please protect this page and delete father nuclear scientist details 154.192.18.61 (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed links, but it looks like this has been done by Daniel Case (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 06:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Bbb23 (talk) 00:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism in general, especially from IP users and those with 'Skibidi' in their username. It's just a hassle for editors to undo, so I would like to request Semi-Protection on the page. However, the vandals may or may not already have auto confirmed statuses. MarinaTheRanger (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently being targeted by the a IP hopping LTA: WP:LTA/HTF. MrOllie (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism restarted as soon as the page got unlocked. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 23:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 20:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism for a couple of weeks. Please do return if it starts up again, although if it does, reporting at AIV might get better results. Joyous! Noise! 23:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please report that user to WP:AIV if they continue. Joyous! Noise! 23:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor(s) repeatedly adding unsourced genres despite multiple warnings/reverts. Diff 1, 2, and 3. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. ElephantMario (talk) 11:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism after protection was removed previously - Some edits appear to be BLP Policy violations Connorcp (talk) 11:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The editor waited for the pp time to expire an went right back to making changes. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 12:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by persons claiming affiliation with Mr. Ayariga or his political party, the All People's Congress. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing, and recurrent vandalism by persons claiming affiliation with Mr. Ayariga or his political party, the All People's Congress. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar reason per past PPs, drive by disruptions by IPs and new accounts which refuse to engage on a page subject to these regularly. Asking for a mid term EP here till these users either enagage or abate. Gotitbro (talk) 17:17, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA, CalebHughes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Spencer. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 07:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 07:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection has only just come off and there has been editing by an IP against established consensus today. TarnishedPathtalk 11:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have decided after some reflection I will log this at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs adding nonsense Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of repeated IP vandalism despite very clear note. Anwegmann (talk) 23:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 04:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The youth can't help themselves, "ligma balls" is a funny joke and this page will constantly face vandalism. Needs some level of protection. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 04:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 04:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content/unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 09:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page was stable until it was protected. But as soon as it got unprotected IP users are deliberately making disruptive changes. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 13:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption. Semsûrî (talk) 15:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. There's too much nationalistic editing that's been going on for too long in an article clearly within a contentious topic, so I'm logging this too. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent attempts by IPs to add WP:PROMO. Amigao (talk) 15:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Isi96 (talk) 04:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's been no vandalism or edit warring recently. This is not needed. TarnishedPathtalk 10:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article has the contentious topics arbitration enforcement notice on its talk page, so page protection is needed even if no edit warring has occurred. Isi96 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The CTOP notice (added by myself I think) is only because it is a related topic, not because it is directly about WP:ARBPIA. TarnishedPathtalk 02:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARPBIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It definitely needs it, but I am not doing this under ARBPIA as that has not been anywhere near what the disruption has been about. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper keeps bringing back bad information Vidpro23 (talk) 02:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruption in the page, and two editors are edit warring and removing cited sources. Jonharojjashi (talk) 17:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False. Two editors are not edit warring (neither of us broke 3rr and we even reached a consensus). Rest can be seen in the talk section of the article; expecting the requester to make a comment for a consensus. Imperial[AFCND] 17:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I need to ask a third time, beacuse, as expected, ipuser ignored my calls to take it to the page talk page, he had also ignored my post in his talk page asking to debate a conenseus, so i can safely assume that he purposely avoided any type of consensus talk, no matter what i tried.

There has no other way, this is the not the first time it happens, i am asking for semi-protection not as preventive measure, but as last resort agnaist the lack ot interest in make consensus and as a way to avoid a edit war that would make more harm than good. Meganinja202 (talk) 01:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Did you try the IP's talk page? Doesn't look like it. No wonder they keep coming back. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 181.42.0.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months as a sock range of globally locked Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan after Meganinja provided additional information on my talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It only took a few days after the last semi-protection by Johnuniq expired till the same story started to repeat itself. The Belarus IP editor in the former case is partially blocked from this page by Daniel Case in a /20 range. The current activity is outside this range, but within the same /18 range. T*U (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Extended semi-protection: IP users are doing several unconstructive edits from the time it got unprotected. Please semi-protect it for indefinite time with Extended confirmed users and administrators access for edits.

Pri2000 (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest target of abuse from globally banned pest WP:LTA/GRP. User is known to post threats and abusive rants on the talk page archives of the users he considers to be his "enemies". (For example, see Special:PageHistory/User talk:JavaHurricane/Archive 5.) Additionally, there is no need for anons to touch talk page archives anyways. JavaHurricane 08:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Antandrus. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 08:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 08:37, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued WP:ARBPIA vandalism Hypnôs (talk) 08:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current election, IP address continues to add results to the lead when no such results have been declared yet. Similar disruption likely for a while. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him☎️) 14:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to unduly promote the subject's philanthropism and supposed net worth. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism keeps going after protection expires. Request for even longer protection. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 15:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We should really consider opening an LTA page on this vandal. Daniel Case (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing on the singles on the infobox. Erick (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. BangJan1999 18:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. BangJan1999 18:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. BangJan1999 18:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism despite very clear internal note. Anwegmann (talk) 19:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Israel-Hamas conflict, current Politics, etc. originally split off from 2024_pro-Palestinian_protests_on_university_campuses, so should inherit same protection 2600:6C5A:587F:4532:40CE:20FA:16D9:FC05 (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs reinstating the same unsourced edits - Arjayay (talk) 20:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 20:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple vandalisms from different IP addresses on the same day (most of them unnoticed for many hours) MGeog2022 (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing edit war. Sink Cat (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page falls under the sanction of WP:GS/AA and gets its content deleted constantly.

  • A newly registered user deletes Vardanyan's relation to Putin[1], gets warned on talk page [2]. Does the same this again[3]
  • A non-EC, inactive[4] user (3 years), deletes Vardanyan's relation to Putin[5]
  • Yet another newly regostered non-EC user deleted lot's of reliable sources including BBC, Forbes, Washington Post etc.[1][2] The most concerning part is that the user initially deletes 4 sources under the edit name WP:REFMOB[3] and then after 5 minutes, deletes the content saying "any such claims should have multiple sources".[4].

PS: I think it's worth to mention that the article contains some edits by a disclosed COI user. See the talk page template. Aredoros87 (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at GS/AA. Daniel Case (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05 May 2024

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, an IP (not me, but a different IP) keeps removing the Nationality (British-Italian) from the Lede. In fact it's becoming very persistent, I suggest a a temporary protection for this page. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we protect the page you won't be able to edit it either. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, is it possible to make the protection a pending changes protection? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 07:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The White lock with the checkmark on it. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 07:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. That will work. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is CTOPS short for Contentious Topic? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 22:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. See WP:CTOPS. As a BLP article, this qualifies, especially since the edit warring is nationalistic in nature. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current sporting event seeing the usual uptick in vandalism, a day or two of semi ought to cover it. Nswix (talk) 21:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: It's fine although three days seems a little long given the current level of disruption. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it's a current sporting event ... this gives things time to settle down. Usually. Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Recent genre war lead to two editors getting blocked and now IP users are disruptively changing the genres. Bowling is life (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Removing all sourced content without having any discussion on talk page. Previously also this IP used to vandalize this stock exchange pages. Tcspower (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This last happened about five days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: I have decided to leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent semi-protection. Contentious topic (WP:CT/KURD). Multiple unregistered users vandalizing the casualties. Just noticed a vandalism from 2018 that went unnoticed for nearly six years. The edit exponentially increased US casualties from 6 to 71, and the page remained that way since 2018. Diff [5]. Ecrusized (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Autoconfirmed user keeps blanking sections, Extended protection needed. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 14:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article keeps being reverted to an inferior version of the article by the same person with their reasoning being NPOV, despite everything mentioned in the article being accurate and properly sourced. I do give benefit of the doubt that they mean well, but it is starting to become an editing war, and given the article's subject is a controversial figure, people will most likely have strong opinions about him one way or the other. I'm suggesting that the page become semi-protected due to the controversial nature of the subject and due to continuous reverted edits. CarterLennon (talk) 15:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I mean, it's not like the talk page has been used in anything like the past seven years ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'll use the talk page now, I'm hoping for a resolution but if not I'll make sure to post in here again. CarterLennon (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism since the last 5 days. Thank you!. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 19:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, there's a lot of IP edits, but I'm not seeing a lot of reversion. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High, persistent and ongoing IP vandalism SchroCat (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am NOT vandalizing the page. The article is being edited by numerous WP:UPE sockpuppets. I have literally tried clarifying with you on your talk page. 114.18.93.166 (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are removing material cited to reliable sources. You’re a vandal, nothing more, nothing less. The page needs protecting from your disruption. - SchroCat (talk) 20:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 114.18.93.166 (talk · contribs) blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by WP:LTA/GF36 popping up again. wizzito | say hello! 00:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High, persistent and ongoing IP vandalism. I made a request last night for protection, but this was turned down because one of the vandals was blocked. But guess what: more flaming vandalism has occurred since then, and we have a nice BLP violation as a result. Will someone please stop the disruption on the article? - SchroCat (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow moving edit war involving IP hoppers. Been going on for a week now.LM2000 (talk) 06:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GS/PW. El_C 07:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Most of the article falls under Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4 & WP:ARBAPL. Problematic editing by IPs & non-ECP editors. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 07:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism/edit warring Springee (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In spite of CTOPS designation and past temporary protections, this page gets repeatedly and persistently vandalized as soon as the protection expires. Ram1751 (talk) 03:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 09:29, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing vandalism from multiple IPs. Wikipedialuva (talk) 06:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IPs adding a ton of spaces one at a time, persitent issue, now different ones in a day Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 09:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. ARBECR Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/A-I. Favonian (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of a image showing a literal d'ck by an IP. Please delete the image as well. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(NOTE) 2 offending IPs blocked for 31hrs, but there's still 2 more accounts that also committed vandalism on the page. Is revdel apporiate for edits like these? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the vandalizing users haven't been warned, then warning those users is what I would recommend. I warned one account. If they have continued to vandalize articles after being warned and it's recent, please report them to WP:AIV. I also warned one user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 4. Problematic editing by non-ECP editors. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been protected before, and now the persistent vandalism has returned. Onel5969 TT me 10:15, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 17:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Night Watch (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Permanent extended confirmed protection, contentious topic, WP:CT/KURD. Edit warring between newly registered and unregistered users. Ecrusized (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:SCW. If WP:SEMI proves insufficient, feel free to relist here or drop a note on my talk page for an WP:ECP upgrade, Ecrusized. El_C 19:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Joyous! Noise! 20:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 13:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Not an admin but...) There was a single user causing problems (then blocked indef) and no other edits for 2 months beforehand Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:38, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Certainly not "high levels," but enough, especially for a redirect. El_C 19:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated IP sock vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Not an Admin but...) There are few reasons why this unlikely to be granted
1.Why extended confirmed? Only issue is IP's, which Semi would take care of. No need to protect more than is absolutely necessary.
2.Why indefinite? This is usually used when temporary has been tried and doesn't work, or in Contentous topics. As far as I can see, this is neither. No vandalism before yesterday for 4 months
3.Why protect? There is 1 IP that is causing a problem, if they continue it is easier to block them, causing less collaterall damage.
4.Where is any sockpuppetry? Do you think it's one of the IP's from 4 months ago?
Anyways, probably not going to happen for these reasons@Sportsfan 1234 Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Only some of the advice above is correct. It's correct about it being a candidate for WP:SEMI over WP:ECP, and not being one for an indefinite duration. But they are incorrect about there only being "1 IP that is causing a problem," since after 79.140.150.150 was reverted yesterday (diff), another IP, 78.155.53.110, arrived to undo that (diff). Also, this page has been protected 7 times prior. Me Da Wikipedian, it might be best you gain more experience before offering advice on requests here. Thank you. El_C 20:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops, sorry, don't know how I didn't see that@El C Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP changing historical references to Kiev to Kyiv.  // Timothy :: talk  16:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated content dispute edit-warring from IPs and likely sockpuppets Llacb47 (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has been repeatedly vandalized by IP editors. Afheather (talk) 19:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous individuals have edited my Wikipedia article, spreading false information, and attempting to delete it despite being accepted by many users. 2001:8003:3F18:1C00:F5F7:C528:9763:9738 (talk) 02:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be allowed to remove the AfD template as long as the deletion debate is ongoing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 06:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Not an admin but...) this is the place for requesting a reduction in protection level. This page is currently unprotected. Did you to put it above, in the increase section?
If you did, then please do not go and change it now. The deletion discussion is part of wikipedia's process and must stay as long as the discussion is ongoing. Other people will edit your article, but it's not yours, no one owns any articles here. I see no inaccurate information
Also, you haven't ever even editing the article, let along created it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Me Da Wikipedian: I suspect this is a user who has been editing the article religiously who doesn't realise they've been logged out to make this request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 16:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty likely, but my other concerns remain@Jéské Couriano Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Not an admin) Not to mention the whole issue of ...have edited my Wikipedia article... which violates WP:OWN. Once an article is in mainspace, it is no longer "your draft" or "your article". And any editor is permitted to edit the article, or nominate it for afd (if it meets the afd criteria). Zinnober9 (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The page is not protected (if this is a request for unprotection); not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection (if this is a request for protection). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:11, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: modification 41.248.239.160 (talk) 12:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is from someone who has done a lot of vandalism on multiple articles usually related to Argentina. Bahooka (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Unclear request and, in any case, not enough disruptive editing to justify protection (aside from the IP requesting the protection who has been blocked). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User DeepstoneV is repeatedly removing sourced content [6] by giving a vague reason that sources aren't reliable, I doubt if they know what WP:RS is. Similarly in Gupta–Saka Wars they removed sourced content [7], they should be atleast topic banned from Gupta Empire related articles if not Indian history. Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. You both need to use more than edit summaries to present your respective positions in detail. This forum is not really designed for topic ban requests — use WP:AE or WP:ANI for that. Though I'd recommend you try the article talk page first. El_C 20:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs (most likely sockpuppets) attempting to remove information without establishing consensus after being reverted multiple times. Llacb47 (talk) 19:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs persistently treat the talk page as a place to give prompts to a bot. PetraMagna (talk) 11:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the most recent edits have just been reverted vandalism. we don't have to revert them if we protect the page 750h+ 13:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The vandalism right now is relatively intermittent, but feel free to request again if it becomes especially problematic. The Night Watch (talk) 18:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. — Czello (music) 20:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06 May 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jellyfish: Special:Contributions/47.224.141.36 has been globally locked since 30 April 2024. Are other IP edits related to the sock? How do you know? Johnuniq (talk) 09:17, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry, likely by TyMega. jellyfish  01:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent change of birth year by IP users. This has been an issue since February 2024. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Telenovelafan215: There is nothing on article talk. Since this is an ongoing issue, there should be a section briefly setting out how the DoB is known—preferably a link to a reliable source with a quote from that source. If there is no reliable source, the date should be removed. Johnuniq (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism, keeps trying to change the title to Chelsea because they think that is what it sounds like Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the current outbreak of vandalism stopped already.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep removing sourced content [8] [9] [10] [11]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple redundant requests due to two diss tracks released by Kendrick Lamar. (CC) Tbhotch 16:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Tbhotch:Redundant requests isn't sufficient justification for protecting a talk page, but all of the recent requests being disruptive, BLP violations, or both is a reason. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The Night Watch (talk) 21:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How? We've had 4 bad edits by 2 IPs in a span of a day. Not only that, but this page has a history of non-english content being added@The Night Watch Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Me Da Wikipedian Two IPs in a single day isn't significant disruption, and one of them has been blocked. Talk pages aren't usually protected except in the most severe cases of vandalism and/or disruption, so there is no need to protect the page right now. The Night Watch (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is considered signfiicant disruption for talk pages then. And also there hasn't been literally 1 single good IP edit in nearly 3 months, and like 13 bad ones.@The Night Watch Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moreover, what is so different from the request above that one was approved and one denied, as the situations look pretty similar Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although there is no "bright line" when it comes to significant disruption, In my experience it is usually 3 or more IPs/accounts within a really short time period (a day perhaps) or when a single person is engaging in sock puppetry or severe IP-hopping. All admins have their own judgment on what constitutes significant disruption, but it isn't a good thing usually to protect talk pages because that means if the main article is also protected, good-faith non-autoconfirmed users and IPs can't submit edit requests. I didn't look at the above request but that admin probably just had a different judgment call than me. Ping me if disruption continues and I can maybe issue a semi-protection for a couple days. The Night Watch (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with The Night Watch here. The threshold for protecting a talk page is much higher than for an article. Reader's see the article, not the talk page so much, and the talk page is what gives editors the ability to correct errors on the main article, via an edit request, so there has to be enough disruption on the talk page that it actually hinders the ability to discuss the article before it is protected. This is why talk pages are very rarely protection, and only as a last resort. Dennis Brown - 23:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 03:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Raladic (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 03:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 02:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of recent vandalism where several different IPs are making false ownership statements in the article. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism related to Drake–Kendrick Lamar feud. Cjhard (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Someone using a variety of IP addresses keeps adding irrelevant and poorly sourced information about Peyton Place to the article Wellington Bay (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent death attracting vandalism and some unsourced edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop disruption, particularly aimed at altering the sourced result in the infobox. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the Caucasus, not Eastern Europe. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and continued sockpuppetry. Fred Zepelin (talk) 02:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and PC extended to six months. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Somewhat persistent IP vandalism since 2 days ago (as of this writing). RPC7778 (talk) 02:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:35, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Magentic Manifestations: @Remsense: The edits do not appear to be vandalism, the editor has not been warned a single time on their talk page, and the revert edit summaries are severely lacking. The editor has even tried to start a talk page discussion and has been completely ignored. Please read WP:BITE too. Even if the edits are bad for other reasons, protection is almost certainly not the next step here. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Several partial blocks issued. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from IP Users. I think this page should be PC-Protected 125.160.114.232 (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregistered user is re-adding copyvio tag to article. My personal assessment is that the tag is unwarranted. Furthermore, the copyvio claims were addressed with good faith by User:Skitach. Unregistered user leaving unwarranted warnings on User:Skitach's talk page. Further assessment of copyvio claim is welcome. el.ziade (talkallam) 17:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skitash did nothing to address the copyvio and neither did you. They're all clearly laid out on the talk page and the only thing he did was blank that page. The warning for removal of a copyvio tag on Skitsh's talk page was completely warranted. 2001:8F8:1D2E:CA72:0:0:42A7:AD01 (talk) 02:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The IP has pointed out fundamental policy problems. After thanking them, more care needs to be taken to clean out the obvious copyvios that the IP clearly set out on article talk. Several of those points have been refactored but it is likely that the ideas and phrasings are still too closely following a source. Think of it this way: if you were an academic assessing an essay, what would you think after seeing the source? Johnuniq (talk) 03:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. I'm in agreement with Johnuniq here. @Skitash: @Elias Ziade: Please read the copyright violation tag where it says Please do not remove this notice or restore blanked content until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk, or volunteer response agent. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: For the last week, an IP editor has been deleting information from CKY (band) under the false pretense that the information is incorrect, despite being back by a source. The user also falsely adds the deleted information to CKY (film series), making that article incorrect. The user has received numerous warnings over edit warring as been instructed to bring their issue up on the article's talk page but continues to just delete the info instead. If both articles could be temporarily semi-protected, that would help. NJZombie (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. @NJZombie: Let me know if it resumes. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To any admin wondering: this is Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero, same goes for the other four pages listed below. They are using autoconfirmed-gamed sockpuppet accounts to continue the disruption on the pages after they were semi-protected. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Percy Lowe is now globally locked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Percy Lowe is now globally locked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Percy Lowe is now globally locked indef.
Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Percy Lowe is now globally locked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 03:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Percy Lowe is now globally locked indef. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being blanked since multiple years. Nobody (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 07:53, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: This article was protected in March 2024.[12] IP users have returned and their edits are not really helpful; e.g. violation of MOS, addition of unsourced or fancruft content. Mann Mann (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:GS/PW. El_C 07:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. λ NegativeMP1 07:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 07:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 08:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: She had some kinda twitter fight with someone who calls himself "DJ Vlad" (RIP Bram Stoker) and said some things that could be interpreted as racist (and insulting to black people who have good music taste). But as long as there are no reliable sources covering this we should probably keep this off of Wikipedia. A flood of IPs will edit this in because internet outrage is a powerful high. Screenshots via Reddit here Polygnotus (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Well, I'll never get those brain cells back. El_C 08:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Also possibly sockpuppetry, have reported to SPI separately. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Girth Summit. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: repeated deletion of Disputes section by rapidly changing IP. Adakiko (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unsourced changes by IPs. Some1 (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4085:8dc9:156d::8189:f40a (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits. Suspected IP sock- SPI case initiated. Archives908 (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07. Archives908 (talk) 17:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:587:428b:5278::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits. Suspected IP sock- SPI case initiated. Archives908 (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dealer07. Archives908 (talk) 17:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:587:428b:5278::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from non-autoconfirmed users and IPs. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range keeps changing sourced content [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] . -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Let's try to give it a shot being open. Completely Random Guy (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I'm seeing on the average one or two reverts per week, fairly consistency since the beginning of this year. That tells me that PCP is just creating more work for reviewers and the protection should be changed to semiprotection instead. Removing PCP isn't going to change the workload (except maybe to avoid having to approve the good edits), but at least it's preventing unconstructive edits from becoming visible. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I think that pcp may be creating a little more work "behind the scenes", but it also prevents visible disruption in the first place: things simply don't go live. For my part, I am somewhat loath to semi-protect pages which do get not much disruptive traffic, like in this case. After having had my daily read of our protection policy, this is way under the threshold for semi-protection. If an admin wants to semi-protect: be my guest. Lowering protection to none isn't the way to go, though. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. While I am inclined to replace PCP with semiprotection, based on Lectonar's comment, let's leave it as it is for now. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I click on the article, it still shows a Semi-Protection on it (even though according when I click on "View History" it shows that it is Extended-Confirmed), can someone please fix this? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – It currently shows the blue "extended confirmed" protection icon. Favonian (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. An IP needs to be blocked for edit warring. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 14:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 128.92.27.115 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Not ruling out protection, but currently watching how it plays out. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:PIA B3251 (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Biography Chefxavier (talk) 15:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Meaningless request. PS: You should avoid writing about yourself. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:8512:5300::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Deleted twice pursuant to discussion them recreated in mainspace by SPA (now up for speedy deletion). Requesting creation protection to hopefully curb the likely UPE concern. CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07 May 2024

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Majority of recent edits are anon IP, and more often than not reverted due to policy violations. It's getting hard to find a reliable past version to revert to... cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent IP vandalism on high-profile rap feud Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 23:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Moneytrees. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has started after protection expired. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users have came into the page for months on end adding random content. My previous request (here) for a long duration ban was ignored because... ? So these are IPs that have been tampering around for months, perhaps approaching half a year of this now. I request a months long duration ban on IP users, the sole source of the article being messed around. High protection isn't needed but atleast some level of protection is, for a long duration of time as this just happens to be one of those articles that need it. This article literally degrades over time when left alone thanks to these IP users. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Isreal-Hamas War, and seems very prone to vandalism and disruptive editing. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Restored after full protection expired. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic, related to the Isreal-Hamas War. Plus, the IRI is a proxy of Iran, so it is definitely prone to vandalism. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 01:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks from Entertainment4Reality after named accounts blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive content removal by unregistered user(s). Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content, high level of IP vandalism, and disruptive editing. 216.208.153.194 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that this means you won't be able to edit during that time. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't need full protection when an IP is involved. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IPs to BLP following press speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full protection - an editor refuses to observe WP:REFVAR, repeatedly changing the reference style, badly, leaving multiple citation errors each time. They have been warned repeatedly on their talk page for disruptive editing, but continue to WP:CANTHEARYOU. Skyerise (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I had some citation errors, I also fixed the majority of issues. That current referencing makes it hard to read the source let alone verify the sources cited. In the process of adding page numbers and checking sources I found numerous content issues as well. I explained on multiple occasions that I was in the middle of correcting the citation errors when I was reverted by Skyerise. I needed to save those edits otherwise would have lost hours of work. —Notgain (talk) 22:01, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What you are doing is prohibited unless you get consensus on the talk page first. It doesn't matter whether you make errors or not. You aren't supposed to be doing it in the first place. Skyerise (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Until I come back and restore the semi-protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and newly registered persistent removal of WP:NOTCENSORED content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: NOTCENSORED doesn't seem relevant here, given that the issue here is application of BLP. After reading the information in the article, the allegations were disproven, so having it so prominently in the lead (and spending so many bytes on it in the body, frankly) seems undue. The role of the lead paragaph in a BLP is to explain why the person is notable and this isn't it. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My protection was based on the fact that the article has been edited disruptively on the regular for well over a year. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess what I'm trying to say is that what seems like disruptive editing (removals of content) is actually reasonable and compliant with our policies. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that needs to be discussed on the talk page, not in edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalsim. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 166.205.124.91 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight.The Night Watch (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism on the day the protection expired. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 00:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High risk being issued for OK today, please protect page for at least 48 hours. BryceM2001 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And really this sounds like a request for pre-emptive protection, which we almost routinely decline. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent BLP vio and unconstructive editing Orchastrattor (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two violations since 2 May. The violation prior to that was in March. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggested by User:Mer764Wiki. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mentioning me. Byt no seriously, Broadcasting stations are not a joke. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | TalkContributions) 18:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: LITERALLY an minute after Mvcg66b3r's revert was reverted, that revert by the vandal was reverted by someone else. (Mvcg66b3r is not an vandal). mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | TalkContributions) 19:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. User:Alfamart KURWA blocked by PhilKnight. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sustained IP vandalism/linkspam over last 48 hours. Editor switching IP after edits are rolled back. All come from 203.x.x.x which is a Hong Kong China Unicom (public mobile internet) domain.

Mark Six and Macau Jockey Club also need protection. I think a short period of semi-protection would be enough. Oblivy (talk) 23:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 203.160.64.0/19 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 02:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These pages seriously need locking down because the IP keeps asking for re-reviews without addressing the issues raised on the relevant talk page which is akin to Wikipedia:DISRUPTIVE. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 18:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have not looked close enough to determine if a request to protect this draft is valid. However, I will say this IP is part of a larger UPE sock farm and we will be dealing with their bludgeoning of this draft (and others) unless a protection is made. And while it is unlikely to stop them, hopefully it will slow them for a while.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 182.182.0.0/17 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 182.182.0.0/17 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An edit war is happening over whether to include "Unpledged electors" as a candidate in the election wikibox. There should be a revision of the edit and temporary protection to allow for a proper consensus over the issue to be reached. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 05:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 02:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The IP's /64 has been globally locked. The named account now says it's not registered on this wiki. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 103.108.60.153 Ullan364 (talk) 04:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please reduce it to semi protection. I am a UCLA prof, my students have learned to edit Wikipedia and are keen to contribute. I created the article. But they are new so extended confirmation has blocked their edit access. Noopur28 (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Noopur28, the article is protected by an arbitration decision (WP:CT/A-I) and can't really be unprotected. Or rather, if it was technically unprotected so that your students could edit it, their edits would be immediately reverted by others enforcing the still-existing prohibition on their editing.
Encourating students relatively new to Wikipedia (less than 500 edits or less than 30 days account age) to jump into such a contentious topic is almost certainly a bad idea; you'd either need to supervise them in a way that would make them an army of meatpuppets of your own account, or let them edit without such supervision and end up in various heated Wikipedia conflicts due to their lack of experience.
The protection serves a useful purpose and those students who actually possess the needed Wikipedia experience to edit such pages are already able to do so.
You may already be aware of Wikipedia:Student_assignments#Advice_for_instructors, but I'll link it here for the sake of completeness. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for picking up the slack, ToBeFree. I tried to advise them on my talk page, but I'm just swamped today, so probably did a poor job at it. El_C 22:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, El_C. I guess depending on how the advice was taken, we may later see a request at WP:PERM/EC from a 5-edit account which can't really be answered in another way than "Sorry, no, this is too early", but that's quickly done. I'm currently a bit worried about the "Unknown author" Wikimedia Commons uploads from Noopur28's account and would normally have marked them with "No source" tags, but I don't want to come down like a ton of bricks endlessly lecturing someone who outside of the Wikipedia bubble would be in a good position to explain the world to me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hear ya, hard to find that sweet spot between overwhelming and laconic. But your advice above is a informative and well-rounded, so kudos. El_C 23:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
😄💚 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noopur here. the Wikimedia no author entries are because I’m collecting protest media from various profs on the ground and they can’t be arsed to make their own accounts. Pls see my history with wiki projects of various flavors. I’ve done photo walks before etc. nothing to worry. 2603:8001:72F0:7DA0:C876:110A:C5B5:45A3 (talk) 03:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous protection ended March 22, 2024, IP disruption is starting again. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: see WP:AFCRD#Redirect request: Obamaism. This was salted as a repeatedly recreated neologism but is a plausible redirect to Political positions of Barack Obama. Salter is no longer active. Queen of Hearts (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected @Queen of Hearts: I have downgraded to ec-protection as I have a suspicion that some protection is still needed. Lectonar (talk) 07:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A grammar fix is required for a sentence in the second paragraph of the article:

"During this attack, 1,139 Israelis and foreign nationals including 766 civilians and 373 security personnel were killed, while 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken captive to the Gaza Strip with the stated goal to force Israel to release Palestinian prisoners"

Change "goal to force Israel to" to "goal of forcing Israel to" Aadamwaheed (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – Thanks, Aadamwaheed! Favonian (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently unprotected but is a contentious topic, however, protecting it now might be preemptive protection. -322UbnBr2 (Talk | Contributions | Actions) 05:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Malinaccier (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 14:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit war on date of death resuming a few days after the previous protection expired. Belbury (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently this actress has passed away hence there is lot of wild edits being made from different IPs. A better protection would help from wild edits. Aadirulez8 (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined In the meantime, the date of death has been adequately sourced; last "wild" edit yesterday. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Grabup (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Why ECP- protection?The IP should be warned, and reported at AIV at need. Lectonar (talk) 07:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lectonar, I requested the protection not for the IP, see this. Grabup (talk) 10:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also see discussion at the Talk page of the article. Grabup (talk) 12:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Often better to block than protect. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True, I also reported him at AIV, but he is using other accounts, that’s why I requested this, thanks for the action. Grabup (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Level of Vandalism increasing, big football star in the making, interest growing. Shinee411 (talk) 11:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User 'Noreay99' is not participating in the talk and is just reverting the page. His IP is constantly changing, but the number '119.13.157.~~' is always the same. Acolex2 (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also warned the user. If they continue being disruptive, please consider reporting to WP:ANI or the appropriate noticeboard. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced additions from various IP addresses. Contentious topics issue - various Hindu nationalist groups claim that the mosque used to be a temple, likely explaining the persistent unsourced changes. Panian513 14:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant addition of unsourced, potentially libellous nickname. ObserveOwl (chit-chatmy doings) 15:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been seven attempts by different IP addresses & newly registered editors over the last 1½ months to change Haffkine's nationality from Russian to Ukrainian. Ukraine was part of the Russian empire when Haffkine was born. That made him a Russian subject, whereas Ukrainian would be his ethnicity. See MOS:NATIONALITY & also WP:MODERNPLACENAME as that has been changed in at least one edit. Peaceray (talk) 15:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. It's been going on like this for over a year. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent & persistent vandalism. Golem08 (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: All edits by non-autoconfirmed users are vandalism, and they make up all recent page history. It is a bit more spaced out than some other articles, but the article is still clearly a magnet for pro-Nazi vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR Ccole2006 (talk) 15:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I am aware of the general sanctions, I am electing to follow the longstanding consensus of not protecting pages preemptively considering how little genuinely disruptive editing has occurred on this page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous Disruptive editing by the user ImperialAficionado. The user keeps on deleting the sourced content [18], [19], [20]. Based Kashmiri (talk) 17:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the talk section. Please do not assume things that you don't know. "Disruptive". Imperial[AFCND] 17:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in the July–September section (users added a Kai Ian movie). The Media Expert (talk) 20:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Non-stop IP/new user ethno-nationalistic disruption of sourced information and related to Falsification of history in Azerbaijan, been ongoing for years and years on end. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. All three. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs continuously changing ACA-VDCA from Delhi to Hyderabad. See Revision history. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 12:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:17, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:03, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Talk page disruption returned after I resumed edits and anti-vandal activities. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - not enough disruptive activity to warrant protecting a user talk page. The IP who made the single harassing edit since protection expired has already been blocked. If it resumes please feel free to ping me. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - the editors involved in this content dispute are extended-confirmed; protection would be meaningless. If edit warring continues, please report to arbitration enforcement. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Related to the Houthis, them being related to the Isreal-Hamas war, making it a contentious topic and being prone to vandalism. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There is very little, if anything, in the article at present related to the war, so I don't think PIA covers it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08 May 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Long term pattern of IPs using the talk page to request help from the show's producers, dating back to at least 2007, and as recently as April 2024.

Examples, just from the newest page of revisions: [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]

Considering that at least some of the examples provided also include new user accounts and not just IPs, I believe extended confirmed protection is a better choice here. GSK (talkedits) 14:58, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page hasn't even been edited in a month. And furthermore:
  • talk pages with absolutely no history of prior protection are just not going to get ECP'ed like that, and
  • that almost never happens outside a contentious topic.
Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:681:D80:E6B0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think this article is not that important of this protection and rather protection this article needs peer review. 103.108.60.158 (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Yet another sock editing over a VPN. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption – non-ECP account(s) repeatedly add a full text of a lengthy Hindu prayer in violation of WP:NOTFULLTEXT. Autoconfirmed protection doesn't help. The disruption has been ongoing already for a couple of years, and is unlikely to cease given the article subject, hence the request for indefinite protection. — kashmīrī TALK 16:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:Akd112358 has been blocked from editing the page for one month. The page is already semiprotected and pending changes protected as CTOPS actions; I don't want to tinker with it at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks. — kashmīrī TALK 20:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently possibly embroiled in a bit of drama in the chess community, however it’s still weakly confirmed to be him (just a reddit account claiming to be him) and clearly a WP:TOOSOON issue. IPs keep editing back in the drama. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 00:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Just twelve minutes after the page's last protection was removed, it was egregiously vandalized by an IP again. This issue is too hot and the Wikipedia article is getting too much direct attention, particularly its infobox. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Critics have raised concerns about NHA's status as a for-profit company, suggesting that the pursuit of profit may undermine the quality of education offered by NHA schools. They contend that NHA and other for-profit charter school operators prioritize financial gain above the educational needs and outcomes of students.

Furthermore, some critics have expressed reservations about NHA's management practices and treatment of teachers and staff. They claim that NHA employs aggressive marketing strategies to attract students and that there have been reports of high teacher turnover rates within NHA schools. These practices, according to critics, can have a detrimental effect on the quality and stability of education provided to students.

However, it should be noted that NHA also has its fair share of supporters who argue that the organization offers valuable educational alternatives for families, particularly in areas where traditional public schools are facing challenges. Supporters highlight the academic accomplishments of certain NHA schools and advocate for parents' right to choose the most suitable educational option for their children. Digitclock23 (talk) 22:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Before requesting protection, please read the protection policy. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @ImTheAvidPheasant: Please read WP:PREEMPTIVE. Indefinite duration is not applied to protections casually. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 00:13, 8 May 2024‎. Panian513 00:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:52, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Contentious topicWP:RUSUKR. User142536732 (talk) 23:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Severe BLP vios. Squeakachu (talk) 03:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is an ARBPIA article. I request indefinite EC protection to enforce the arbcom-imposed ban on non-EC edits. Necessary due to IP endlessly reverting. Zerotalk 04:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Mix of IPs & just registered trying to remove sourced info about controversy. Sariel Xilo (talk) 21:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I had to really ponder this one, but in the end, the two new WP:SPA accounts (and IPs) seem to be trying to argue ad nauseum just to wear people down. Rsparkles is getting close to block territory for refusing to get the point, and it's hard to believe they are doing so in good faith. Short term protection seems the better solution for now. It is entirely reasonable for them to make the bold edit, and discuss, but in the discussion, they simply aren't "getting it", and it just feels intentional. I also wonder if there is meatpuppetry going on. Dennis Brown - 04:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Just updated the report at the edit warring noticeboard with my concerns about sock issues. Sariel Xilo (talk) 04:48, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuously adding that the film will release in July, although there is no confirmation for the same. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from IPs and new accounts recently GraziePrego (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 22:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. @Snowmanonahoe: If the edit warring resumes, please report it to WP:ANEW. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced content has resumed after first protection expired. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Waves of vandalism by IPs in the past few days. It is new, though, so expect IPs to also improve it. Air on White (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption too heavy for pending-changes protection to be effective. Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing. This happened over a month ago, On April 2, to be specific. Another IP changed the Nationality to Egyptian-Italian again (even though there is a note saying not to change nationality without discussing on talk page, yet this IP ignored it). I request a Pending-Changes Protection to be placed to the page. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, pending changes makes a lot of work. If recent disruptive editing occurred, semi-protection would be better. Johnuniq (talk) 04:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean by "Makes a lot of work". Could you 70.50.199.125 (talk) 06:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please explain to me, why Semi-protection is better and what you mean by "makes a lot of work"? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 06:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 05:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We don't usually protect while only one IP is disrupting, and this is already at the edit-warring noticeboard. Lectonar (talk) 07:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editor warring from an editor who's IP hoping around United Arab Emerites. TarnishedPathtalk 06:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

using multiple devices - I'm not attempting to pretend I'm not the same editor - and have stated so in talk. I'm just restoring the longterm established version of an article to comply with both the established consensus, and more importantly WP:BLPCRIME which is an important WP policy you seem intent on ignoring 94.200.83.10 (talk) 06:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined There is an open RFC on article talk, so let's see this play out; if we were to protect, it would be full-protection, but I do not think we're already at the level of disruption and back and forth where this would be warranted. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism Fieryninja (talk) 12:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism after previous protection expired. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 13:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CT/A-I B3251 (talk) 13:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G5d as an WP:ECR violation. Bad sourcing and significant NPOV issues. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – The song itself is within the topic of Arab-Israeli confict, per WP:PIA. Stylez995 (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I for one like to see at least some real disruption before applying ecp-protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism on the article about a person running for office. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 09:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeatedly vandalised, previously protected but vandalised just as soon as the protection ended. Just been vandalised so severely that it required rev-del. Subject is performing for Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest tomorrow, a topic of extreme volatilty, so really needs protection as an ARBPIA action. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully that's long enough for the furor to die down. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism by IP and new accounts Surrealityy (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of poorly written, encyclopedic prose, removal of sourced information, OR by interpreting primary sources and POV pushing. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 15:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after ECP expired. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ECP expired over a year ago. There was one bad edit on May 5, and then the next bad edit goes back to Feb 19. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:GS/RUSUKR Ccole2006 (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And will be logged at the GS page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 1 month protection for persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continuously adding TVGUIDE information that is not sourced or linked to other Wikipedia pages. CNMall41 (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Some IPs seem to making constructive contributions. Let's see how this works. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes I hate to lose a honeypot. They'll just pick another target. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if they do. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:NOTFORUM topics. GSK (talkedits) 15:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target, with most recent vandalism spree starting 04:44, 20 January 2024. Panian513 17:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA target. Panian513 17:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant attempt at changing the sourced result in the infobox. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of disruptive edits over the past week. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Previous semi-protection for a year has not cooled this down any. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection requested. Long-term sock activity. For example: OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages (talk · contribs), Alayyop (talk · contribs), Skibidi Toilet Gyat Sigma (talk · contribs), IPs etc (also see: Talk:Baklava#Vandalism) Bogazicili (talk) 20:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, let us try pending changes first.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Scored two goals today and right away vandalism occures. Kante4 (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was about to request that myself. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09 May 2024

Reason: Persistent unferenced and troll edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 05:03, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Today's vandal left after being warned. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content. livelikemusic (TALK!) 19:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed after protection expired. Wracking talk! 23:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 21:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Much vandalism by an IP hopper over the past day. Air on White (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please upgrade to semi. All recent pending edits have been vandalism or otherwise reverted. Air on White (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Suryavanshiexe (talk) 22:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 07:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopper has made obsessively changed a detail of the page without sourcing or explanation over the past day. Air on White (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been at best clear bias against, at worst, outright untruths, told against Moira Deeming shown in this biographic article, concerning a so called anti trans rally, which was in facr a "Let Women Speak" rally. If Wikipedia has any interest in accurate and fair representation, to both sides of a narrative, edits should be allowed within the normal rules of offensive language or calls for violence, should be allowed. I hope Wikipedia isn't yet another media site where any conservative views are branded far right and shut down. If so, how revealing, in that clearly the supported narrative or argument is so weak, that it cannot stand up to scrutiny? 192.28.122.75 (talk) 04:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If the same editor continues to disrupt the article, please report to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption in April-May, IP:s an new accounts. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – After previous temporary protection expired IP users have again begun marking Bonza as ceased operations. The administrators have yet to decide this although it is the likely outcome we cannot be WP:CRYSTALBALL. Request new temporary page protection. Otchiman (talk) 07:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This ref has upset some fans, who are editing his article to indicate their displeasure ... it's becoming a pain. DBaK (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP has been trying to insert non neutral changes and remove information for the past few weeks. McSly (talk) 02:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/CF. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping changes between NZ and US English. Sjö (talk) 06:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Sjö: Please read WP:PREEMPTIVE. Indefinite protection is not the first step or even the second step. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and new user vandalism Wafflewombat (talk) 06:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Wafflewombat (talk) 06:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Continued IP Vandalism; See Revision history 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption from France IPs including Special:Contributions/2A01:E0A:F3:1230:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/37.169.67.60 and Special:Contributions/37.166.0.176. Binksternet (talk) 12:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject is a high-profile government official in a controversial policy space. BLP article has been subject to unacceptable attacks and vandalism. Request EC protection. Longhornsg (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Affinepplan appears to have made edits from 3 separate IPs/accounts in an attempt to blank sourced information they dislike; while their comments in the talk page are welcome, the fairly clear sockpuppetry is not. –Sincerely, A Lime 02:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this to SPI. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 02:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive, non-constructive editing from Anonymous users. Semi-permanent request for a week. User:CricketXP (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Smalljim.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit war by an IP editor who fails to engage in discussion. — kashmīrī TALK 16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing IP vandalism present since last protection was on the page. Cxhd (talk) 17:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., let us try pending changes--Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of an unsourced nationality. Nswix (talk) 17:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by SPA's dedicated to turn this and related articles into hagiographies of their gurus. — kashmīrī TALK 12:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing edit war by an IP editor who fails to engage in discussion. — kashmīrī TALK 16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Redirect to Wikipedia policy, over 183 thousand links to the redirect. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 18:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption after previous protection expired. Mellk (talk) 18:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The Night Watch (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salt the earth - repeated re-creation of a blatantly promotional draft from a succession of conflict-of-interest editors, currently tagged G11. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 18:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Salt the earth - Draft created as a backup for moved from talk space due to the existence of a draft at Draft:Blue Dream Group above, and just as promotional. I'm not taking any chances here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 18:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism - changing of well-sourced information to incorrect numbers - by an unregistered editor whose IP address changes. This has persisted for several months. Alternatively, that editor could be blocked (they appear to edit from 2604:2d80:9f83:2c00:: so I think that a /64 subnet mask would cover all of their IP addresses). They have also begun to edit Southern Illinois University to introduce incorrect information there. ElKevbo (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Disruptive edit since May 4. Drcarrot.phd (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 20 edits in the past 20 minutes, most of them non-constructive, from multiple user accounts. A short-term protection may be warranted (perhaps a few days). Adam Black talkcontributions 16:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:Persistent vandalism even for registered user. User:CricketXP (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBPIA 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I removed the PIA CTOPS notices because a) the article is already, and I think properly, covered by ARBAP2, and b) per that, there is only incidental relation to PIA, already covered in a couple of grafs in the article. This was an issue well before last October, and most of the controversy over it even since then has had nothing to do with that situation. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Sinclairian (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article is attracting various BLP vandals today and other vandals since early April. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 May 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit warring over last month. Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Skibidi36 (talk · contribs) blocked by EvergreenFir. Indefinitely. Something tells me this might solve the problem. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TheFrenchKing (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any bad edits since the expiration of the last protection. Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined on that basis. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalized. Tantomile (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent ongoing vandalism Ram1751 (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – this page has been frequently vandalized, with people constantly adding false info about him dying, and not providing sources. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – That Happy Tree Friends fanatic is at it once again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. If a year didn't stop them ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An influx of fan editors adding blatantly unsourced and contentious information. ℛonherry 20:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the rest of the existing duration, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Iamda123 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. For added good measure, 2607:FB91::/32 has been globally blocked for three years. Favonian (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 20:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated anti-trans vandalism as subject is currently participating in the Eurovision Song Contest 2024 and repeatedly misgendered out of spite. Could do with protection for about a week which will take it beyond the run of the contest. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per the informal practice now of doing this in every case where article subjects get misgendered. Will also be RevDel'ing those edits and maybe making some blocks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by IPs and new users in the past week, including one who usurped the entire article. Air on White (talk) 01:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP Vandalism over the last week (though this vandal has been doing so on-and-off on all four articles since last November). All IPs are part of the same range. Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2806:10A6:14:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content/unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. instead. Acroterion (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users are blanking sections of the article, and falsely claiming the information is false or "divisive" while doing so. These are exclusively IP edits, and not registered users. I'm requesting semi-protection for both the District's page and Connetquot High School's page. Robertjhennigan (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And all this was two months ago. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP Vandalism adding starring actor that doesn't exist. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 03:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive and misinformation edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism. soibangla (talk) 08:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User partially blocked to stop further disruption of the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and edit-warring. –Sincerely, A Lime 03:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's been over a day since the last edit so let's give the WP:ANEW report a chance. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Johnson54123 (talk) 05:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Alot of misinformation is being added and many important topics are frequently removed 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal of important information by random people 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: removal of important information 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sir... the number of times it is being edited might be less but the information which is being edited is wrong 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive and misinformation edits from IP users. 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, next request to protect this article (this is the third one in an hour) might result in a block of the IP. Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is not needed as many of the facts are quite wrong or not to the point which are needed to be edited and then protected 103.179.102.244 (talk) 09:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Ahir is not protected. Favonian (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk) 02:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A lot of big edits on this article are from User:Lam312321321 socks making ten edits and waiting a few days to get autoconfirmed. Suggest raising to ECP. Belbury (talk) 12:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have created an article but getting difficulty in moving the it from sandbox to the main space for review. Atlantis7807 (talk) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Getting difficulty to move an article from sandbox to main space.Please decrease the protection. Atlantis7807 (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotectedDraft:Arushi Nishank in its current form was rejected at WP:AFC. Only after it passes review will it be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 10:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting increased protection for the Wikipedia page Komail Anam. The page has been experiencing false edits and disruptive edits recently.

To prevent further disruption, I believe the page should be semi-protected, or fully protected. This will allow only registered editors to make edits, require editor approval for all edits.

Thank you for considering my request.

If you want, i can send Komails official documents

Hasan Ansari

TheHasanAnsari Thehasanansari (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user Thehasanansari (talk · contribs) should be warned or maybe blocked instead because they're repeatedly attempting to restore the BLP on a non-notable person.Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, extreme vandalism (e.g. death threats) since 03:58, 24 January 2024‎. Panian513 13:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism removing contents related to Chinese collaboration in the making of the satellite. Large sentences are being removed without any edit summary and stated reasons which are cited with multiple sources. Editor8220 (talk) 02:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 22:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, WP:GENSEX. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see a fair amount of heated recent discussion and low-level edit warring, but nothing that semi-protection would stop. EC, on the other hand, would keep most of the current editors from the page. Is that what you really want? Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption in May. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 22:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The troublemaking IP is back. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice per ARBEE on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have also advised the IP about CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Insane ammounts of vandalism from IPs, I have zero clue why the page isnt protected yet, considering how contentious the topic is 🤓 WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 🤓 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User:78.11.18.109 blocked by Jake Wartenberg --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, genre warring. Binksternet (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C6:229D:D301:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11 May 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Frequent vandalism from IP users LOLHWAT (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 22:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Many of the issues are from bouncing IPs dating back to 2018, could this article have pending changes?. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 23:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think pending changes would be suitable given the disruptive edits that aren't obviously vandalism. Let's try semi-protecting it for a year since the disruption has been going on since at least December 2022. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There are so many inaccurate and extremely biased remarks on this page. It is quite literally, propaganda of the highest order. It needs to be more accurate, objective, and unprejudiced. Decreasing the page protection should help in that regard. TruthBTold17 (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-permanent protection required: IP users have consistently changed the date of the next election to an incorrect date. This has been the 3rd time such disruptive editing has occurred and previous article protections have shown no deterrence for IP users who've remained consistent. A semi-permanent protection seems necessary. Tofusaurus (talk) 04:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting pp due to recent edit wars. HinduKshatrana (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate vandalism within a day of protection being lifted. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several IP editors have tried to to replace this article with another comic cons, and they appear to have zero connection. The other comic con appears to have notability if they would simply go through the articles for creation process. Esw01407 (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent addition of typos (it only gets funnier the 68nd time). cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Patrollers can't keep up with the unending barrage of unsourced edits. The PC we had before worked really well. A long semi is an acceptable alternative. Thanks,. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 21:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationality warring. Nswix (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruptive editing since April 2024 by IP edits. Isaidnoway (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of promotional content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP users keep changing the genres without sources. Bowling is life (talk) 18:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 03:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new user(s) falsifying chart peaks in the article. Also likely sockpuppetry as this has been going on for weeks, with different accounts getting involved, some of which have been indefinitely blocked. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new user(s) falsifying chart peaks in the article. Also likely sockpuppetry as this has been going on for weeks, with different accounts getting involved, some of which have been indefinitely blocked. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/new user(s) falsifying chart peaks in the article. Also likely sockpuppetry as this has been going on for weeks, with different accounts getting involved, some of which have been indefinitely blocked. MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 22:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of WP:SPA WP:SOCKpuppetry going on, repeatedly trying to close down the discussion out of process. It's getting quite annoying. Extended confirmed protection against editing by recently created accounts? NLeeuw (talk) 23:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator OwenX. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war from multiple IP editors, addition of unsourced content. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 01:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 09:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Existing indef semi raised to indef ECP. Note that one of the edit-warring users is currently at SPI (I have also given him a CTOPS alert); if he and the other user he's been warring with here and at other articles (currently blocked for the week) are indeffed for whatever reason, I suppose we could go back to semi. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: no edit 2001:FB1:16D:9959:B400:272B:B377:440D (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been recently targeted by a sockpuppeteer over multiple accounts and IPs. Air on White (talk) 20:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen blocked the registered account indef and the IP for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism by 180.252.115.106 (talk), removal of large section of vehicles with no edit summary or reference/source provided for removal. A look through existing sources shows that the section removed is still in service, and thus should remain. At the risk of edit warring occurring due to reverts, this page should be protected and 180.252.115.106 investigated or prevented from editing. KarmaKangaroo (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just those two edits. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Revision history shows disruption from auto-confirmed accounts, especially User:Ar8930, adding unsourced content claiming that "Shapiro mocked Christianity on Twitter" without giving source. Extend the protection to Extended-Confirmed protected. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 01:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Will log at CTOPS under AP. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by others. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:51, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 08:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Restore previous protection. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism as the subject is participating in Eurovision Song Contest 2024, including unfounded allegations of antisemitism being added to lede. Given it's about her "conduct" towards the Israeli performer, this may just about fall under ARBPIA as Eurovision this year itself is an ARBPIA topic. Either way, repeatedly been vandalised or had low quality info added to it the last few days. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 08:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. HorrorLover555 (talk) 11:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some dude keeps adding "Birdman" as the translation of Kuruvi, which is incorrect. That dude's rationale is that because the the lead character can fly (in a single scene he makes an impossibly long jump), but the character is not an avian humanoid. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is not vandalism as the term is used on Wikipedia so WP:ANI would be the appropriate noticeboard, but the editor needs to be warned first. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: I know this is not a valid reason for protection. But I have added some important updates with reliable sources which may increase the possibility of persistent vandalism in this article about a highly controversial subject. I also request the help of Wikipedia administrators or any highly experienced users if my edit need any correction. Pachu Kannan (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 11:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per WP:GS/RUSUKR. Page is dealing with a number of new editors adding unsourced claims to the page. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:GS/RUSUKR. Favonian (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. intforce (talk) 10:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Please use WP:AIV for blatant vandalism reports. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 10:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this. It's getting bad on that page. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 14:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent events cause vandals John123521 (Talk-Contib.) 12:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated, ongoing antisemitic vandalism after having previously been protected for same reason. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 13:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Globally locked LTA FateHags99 and associated sockpuppets were trying to persistently add a non-notable person, unsourced, to this page on nlwiki, enwiki, and frwiki before being locked, now IPs are trying to reinsert it. Supreme_Bananas (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism over last hour or so, likely to increase due to his involvement in Eurovision 2024. 5.80.175.32 (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think this Article should be unprotected because it contains the necessary information and resources for the subject, and is well-known enough to be published. Shahrwzi (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Actually, the draft isn't protected, but Afarin Kids TV is. Considering the previous, failed attempts at creating this article, you need to get the draft approved through the articles for creation process. Once it's approved, it will be moved to article space. Favonian (talk) 13:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Hi, I would like to request for this article to be protected for a month, since multiple geotagged users have been vandalising this article for the last three to four weeks. I have reverted all the disruptive edits and have even warned the users to stop the vandalising but to no avail, with the latest vandalising happening earlier today, which I also had to revert. That's why I felt like the only option left was to request a temporary protection of one month. Nori2001 (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In general, this page suffers from frequent additions that violate WP:OR (including improper editorial synthesis), due to a misunderstanding of the article's topic; this is mostly done by IPs and new users. However, there is a persistent IP (actually, a range) that has been trying to add original research since the middle of February; this also includes the removal of inline cleanup tags (such as {{request quotation}} and {{page needed}}) and their refusal to engage in the talk page. This is clearly disruptive behavior; in my opinion, it can be handled by either applying semi-protection, or a range block (I can share relevant diffs for that), or even both. Demetrios1993 (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different edits from different IPs and they are not constructive, appears to be edit wars (I haven't warned them yet). Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:29, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:43, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk / contributions) 13:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs keep vandalizing the franchise owner's identity, in the infobox GoodDay (talk) 15:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Waqar💬 15:38, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 222.124.51.198 (talk) 16:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No article of that name ever existed on this Wikipedia. Furthermore, you have not presented anything resembling a coherent request. Favonian (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – SPA constantly moving the draft to the main namespace created by now blocked sock and the SPA appears to be evading their block. GSS💬 13:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected indefinitely. Move protected by JJMC89. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism. Requesting semi-protection of page Stevan markus (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current edit war. Apparently between two users, each of which is changing IPs and one of whom just created an account. Air on White (talk) 20:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Every edit by a new user or IP this year has been reverted as vandalism or spam. Air on White (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of speculated information of WP:CRYSTALBALL. >> Lil-unique1 (talk)21:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 May 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Frequent target of Rang HD. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The Night Watch (talk) 00:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikibear47 (talk) 00:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be a long-term edit war happening here. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Classicwiki: I don't think it's quite at the point where full protection is needed, but I would encourage you to warn editors engaging in edit warring on that article. I semi-protected the article due to persistent disruptive edits, including the most recent edits. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan, it was difficult to discern what was happening and there was a lot of IP edits. I did not know if it would be worth the time to warn everyone involved. But will try to get to it. Thanks for the semi-protection. -- Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism from users due to the Battle for Dream Island web series. Gaismagorm (talk) 22:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war on including the peacock phrase "considered one of the best defenders in the world". 2A00:23C4:8083:B001:7DDC:5468:73E4:E32B (talk) 23:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war on peacock phrase that he is "one of the most promising and best youngsters in the world". 2A00:23C4:8083:B001:7DDC:5468:73E4:E32B (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as previous – edit warring about a WP:PEACOCK statement. — kashmīrī TALK 23:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Marnanel (talk) 00:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This article is not an exception and should be ECP protected too, as all similar articles are now. Notably including Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in July–December 2015. Josethewikier (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war on peacock description "one of the best midfielders in the world". 2A00:23C4:8083:B001:7DDC:5468:73E4:E32B (talk) 23:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Disruptive edits by IP again and again. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk / contributions) 03:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2600:1700:D30:2260:8B:107:E682:AC0F (talk) 03:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing. Jingiby (talk) 04:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After recently being unlocked, there's already two unreferenced edits from two different IP users in less than 24 hours. Requesting for a longer protection period. Hotwiki (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps adding Jisshu Sengupta, who is not part of the cast. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was added 09:17, 11 May 2024 plus many more unsourced changes. Johnuniq (talk) 05:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This page was automatically template protected when {{Automatic category TOC}} was accidentally updated to call the sandbox version of {{Automatic category TOC/core}}. This has been corrected, so protection is no longer necessary. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 05:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and persistent adding of negative content from non WP:RS. Georgeee101 (talk) 04:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Georgeee101: You may be correct but the edits are not vandalism and an explanation would be needed on article talk (which currently has nothing). Please engage with the IPs and explain about RS. If there is a link to WP:RSN discussing the source, include that. Then protection would be more justifiable. Johnuniq (talk) 05:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits by IPs and new users in the past few years have been vandalism. This is a soft redirect, so there is little room for improvement. I request pending changes protection to stop the vandalism for good. Air on White (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It is a soft redirect to Wiktionary and has not had a useful edit for a long time. Pending changes is a pain because edits still happen and have to be checked/reverted. Johnuniq (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism over the past day. Air on White (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Google translate says that one of the recent edits (in Hindi) was "Due to lack of information about the logo, the title of Cha-Ka-Ma Logo in Hindi has been shown wrongly on Google. Chakma has always been shown in Devanagari script of Hindi which is wrong. Actual name is Cha, Ka, Ma". I don't know if that is relevant to the article but clearly it is inappropriate as written. I'm just recording what happened. Johnuniq (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption, same type (and same user) as Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/05#Whitechocolatespaceegg. As an admin I could do it myself but I'm too involved. Graham87 (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 07:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Heavy IP vandalism since page's creation yesterday due to ongoing controversy surrounding article's subject. Liu1126 (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: High level of IP vandalism, and addition of unverified claims and information, as well as threat messages. — JL 09 talkcontribs    08:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IP editors keep making unsourced changes to the film budget and removing negative reviews from the article. This has been occurring on an almost regular basis since over a week ago. — AP 499D25 (talk) 08:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:22, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is perpetual, all year round. — Czello (music) 09:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 09:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP, incorretcly changing sourced info Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But you spelled incorrectly incorrectly (as incorretcly), how dare you! El_C 10:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Hotwiki (talk) 08:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Persistent vandalism – Never-ending edits by socks. User is now working way up to ECP so that they can edit this page and other similar targets. See the SPI history. Usually the same pattern. Check user found Assam Uploader. --. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 08:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, upgraded to extended confirmed--Ymblanter (talk) 09:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection please - the sock is vandalizing my notes about him Arjayay (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protectedFavonian (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that this article is semi protected due to high edit rating and possible vandalism. IP address or unregistered users only. PEPSI697 (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only a single edit has been reverted today, so far. Please submit a new request if disruption escalates. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. They changed the height without providing reliable sources. Annh07 (talk) 11:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Favonian (talk) 13:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page continues to be vandalized by anonymous accounts, a short time after its lock was removed. Name may be one reason it's targeted. Paris1127 (talk) 18:05, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. 3 months. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was semi-protected for repeated vandalism between 2009 and 2011, with the last being an indefinite semi-protection. However, the page receives few edits today, and I feel that the reasons for semi-protection are stale. Jedward appears to receive significantly less attention today than they did in the past in general. Computerfan0 (talk) 12:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Acalamari: as the protecting admin, what's your opinion? Favonian (talk) 13:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Been over 12 years, so I agree with Computerfan0's rationale for unprotection. :) Acalamari 16:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
UnprotectedFavonian (talk) 18:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please change {{Delrevafd|date=2011 May 6}} to <noinclude>{{Delrevafd|date=2011 May 6}}</noinclude>, per WP:DRV and in order to prevent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 May 4 from being sorted into Category:Pages at deletion review. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 17:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Keeps getting Genghis Khan related vandalism. WoofWoof21 (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Common target for Genghis Khan related vandalism. WoofWoof21 (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many cases of vandalism over the years, but more recently disruptive/vandalism by unconfirmed IP users, see examples below:

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user keeps adding incorrect information. RickyCourtney (talk) 13:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes protection. Persistent additions of promotional content by dynamic IP (e.g. [31] [32][33]). The smallest range that seems to include most spam is Special:Contributions/49.43.0.0/16, so a pblock might work too. 128.41.35.152 (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism for the past week. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wikibear47 (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Has been recently bombarded with copyvios, OR and unsourced edits by new users. Also please inspect individual edits to revdel copyvios as necessary. Air on White (talk) 17:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13 May 2024

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk / contributions) 10:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.207.192.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurring IP vandalism. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of dispute for which article was previously protected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:46, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs copying details of every film from the film articles into the actors article - has been going on for months - Arjayay (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 43.241.64.145 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated insertion of a long list of unsourced and negative nicknames on a BLP, by a number of different IPs whose only edits are specifically this insertion. Could do with some temporary protection until they hopefully get bored. EasyAsPai (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 83.27.240.0/20 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also left CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page keeps getting temporary semiprotection, and the vandals come back once it's gone. 9yz (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been a lot of IP vandalism as of late (sometimes with IP addresses fighting each other through their edits). Me and other users have attempted to revert some of this, but I can't do much more without violating WP:3RR or starting an edit war, neither of which I want to do. Historyday01 (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please invoke WP:CT/GENSEX IanDBeacon (talk) 20:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 85.104.192.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for a month. I will also give one of the IPs they used a CTOPS alert, and do the usual cleanup and preparation should we need to protect this under CTOPS in the future. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can agree with that. It does seem it has gotten worse as of late, unfortunately. Historyday01 (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of stealing content and vandalism Raxtheman110 (talk) 22:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article does not exist. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continuously adding unsourced information that violations NOTTVGUIDE. CNMall41 (talk) 23:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 00:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism/trolling. User keeps changing the infobox picture away from one of the subject to one of artwork depicting someone else. PascalHD (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Page was protected for 2 days on May 10 due to a persistent vandal who kept changing the name at the top of the infobox and choosing gibberish usernames like Gy6hhhy and Tyujhyyu. Less than an hour after the protection lapsed, we again have the article being vandalized (example) by someone changing the name at the top of the infobox and choosing a gibberish user name - Yhhgy755gg7 this time. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please encourage the author to create the article via AFC process instead. We don't need a AFD discussion every year this is moved to main space. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 01:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We generally do not protect pages indefinitely as a first step. That goes doubly for talk pages. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IPs keep making the same change, adding an extra link to the DZKB-TV entry. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There seems to be an ongoing edit war involving 1 or more IP addresses. Erp (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Erp: @Joyous!: Please feel free to submit a new request if semi-protection doesn't do the job. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please change {{Delrevxfd|date=2022 March 17}} to <noinclude>{{Delrevxfd|date=2022 March 17}}</noinclude>, per WP:DRV and in order to prevent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 5 from being sorted into Category:Pages at deletion review. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 22:56, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IPs specifically, removing sourced content. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 04:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 06:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a truly enormous wave of sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry targeting this page. Please also block all vandalizing IPs and accounts as warranted. Air on White (talk) 07:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting and partially undeleting that page's history would be helpful here. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 07:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sockpuppeteer responsible for previous requests. Air on White (talk) 07:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See prev 2 requests. Air on White (talk) 07:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping sock vandals. Air on White (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temperory Semi- Protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant pov pushing and tampering with main cast. Also addition of unreliable sources.Imsaneikigai (talk) 10:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been move protected for almost two decades; had move vandalism in the early days of the encyclopedia, but no reason to believe that such vandalism is still an issue. BilledMammal (talk) 02:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, sort of. I changed it from Sysop-only to EC move protected for 1 year, mainly because you just had a successful RM and didn't want to see some random new user go and undo a valid discussion, repeating history. After 1 year, the move protection will automatically expire. Dennis Brown - 08:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection is no longer necessary, because it doesn't seem like there has been much disruptive editing. Lower it to Semi-protected 70.50.199.125 (talk) 03:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you jest? The page isn't protected! (Last protection fell off Oct. 2020.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 03:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm...2 different links used. Alien(film) is (much to my surprise) not protected, while the disambig page found at Alien is. IP: which page did you mean? Lectonar (talk) 06:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm guessing he means Alien, which Fish and karate protected to EC some time back. And I would say the reason there hasn't been disruptive editing is BECAUSE of the protection. That said, semi-protection would probably be adequate, rather than EC. Because F&K isn't very active right now, I will leave open for another opinion, but I think semi is fine. Dennis Brown - 11:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I have lowered it to semi for now due to a lack of activity, and the fact that most of the disruption when the protection was applied was from non-autoconfirmed users. Ping me if disruption resumes. The Night Watch (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsupported addition of the same content by unregistered IPs. Blocked here but now possibly same person IP hopping. Aeengath (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC) edited Aeengath (talk) 13:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also renewed the range block. Malinaccier (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unsourced edits by IP editors. VK wiki100 08:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of LTA. Air on White (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of LTA. Air on White (talk) 08:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of LTA. Air on White (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see page's history. Six month protection would be good. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption not heavy enough by far; please have a look at our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 14:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and BLP violations. Former Fijian Prime Minister, recently arrested. I would go with extended-confirmed-protection if it was up to me. Schestos (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Staraction (talk | contribs) 16:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies of the 2024 Eurovision Song Contest insert Censorship of Portuguese performance on social networks due to Palestinian symbols on nails. "RTP’s President, Nicolau Santos said today that the broadcaster awaits "thorough" answers about the delay in posting Iolanda's performance during the #Eurovision final."

Broadcaster RTP will present a formal protest to the EBU in case foul play is detected by the delayed upload of iolanda’s performance. Danopt (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2024 is not protected. Note that the PIA General Sanctions are in effect here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 20:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Please use an edit request on article-talk. Lectonar (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive Editing by IPs, potentially the same person over and over. Talk page discussion was opened but ignored. Vestigium Leonis (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already solved by @Ferret, can be archived / closed or however it is handled here! Vestigium Leonis (talk) 18:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ferret. Favonian (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continued when protection expired. Wracking talk! 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Wracking talk! 18:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of LTA. Air on White (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by unregistered users. Needs an enhanced protection. Recent previous locking was insufficient. AideDésintéressée (talk) 10:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent events casuing vandals John123521 (Talk-Contib.) 10:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 16:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism and/or changing material without references. Articles are subject to WP:GS/PAGEANTS general sanctions. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PAGEANT. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continuously adding unsourced programming. Been going back and forth since the beginning of May. CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CNMall41: An edit being unsourced does not make it vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on its face it is not. I reverted the last as vandalism based on the history of warnings and one of the IPs being blocked for doing so. Will simply rollback next time and not mark as such. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41: I'm just looking for requests here to state an accurate reason that describes (at least) the most serious recent disruption (just like edit summaries should state the reason for an edit). There's a wide variety of reasons why pages can be protected by administrators and that includes disruptive levels of unsourced edits (see WP:DE). Calling everything vandalism isn't necessary and it doesn't help anyone reviewing the situation. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 19:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP has been repeatedly messing with the list. McSly (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 104.35.8.48 (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article was last edited in January, and the last "vandalism" is lost in the mists of time. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CT/A-I B3251 (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalism- there are several problems on this page, adding lots of unsourced content by ip´s which gets reverted regularly by other editors i.e. [[34]], [[35]], [[36]], [[37]] etc. or sock puppet behaviour like this ip who is probably the same person [[38]], [[39]], [[40]] etc. This goes on for several months. Theonewithreason (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Skitash: Please start explaining your reverts in your edit summaries. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from a (now banned) Auto-confirmed account, if you look at the revision history you will see that a use by the name of Markokapdbe has vandalized the page. But it looks as if they were banned, and other than that, there hasn't been much vandalism or disruptive editing. Maybe it's time for a Pending-Changes protection. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 18:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent re-adding of false claims from non WP:RS sources by same person using multiple IPs even after clear explanations on the talk page. Georgeee101 (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please provide diffs of the "high level of IP vandalism" that you speak of. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2024

Reason: and related AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janno Lieber due to disruptive editing by a SPA and an IP editor repeatedly reopening an improper AFD by reversion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has been handled outside of here. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR and WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, edit warring from Florida, block evasion by Special:Contributions/2600:1006:B130:1CD0:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly all edits on this article this month have been to counteract the IP editors who have repeatedly added, or have replaced well established Trillion dollar countries (eg USA, Japan) with, Pakistan, a country that has never gotten anywhere close to 1 Trillion GDP according to the this article's main source (#3), with source 4 on Economy of Pakistan, and any basic web search for "current GDP of Pakistan". For a moment I thought it was possible that the IPs were confusing PPP (Purchasing Power Parity) with GDP, as Pakistan's PPP is 1.57 trillion (2023 est), BUT that is not how this article is presenting the data, or how the other entries are calculated, and the flat out replacement of the USA with Pakistan does not allow any good faith assumptions for any possible PPP/GDP confusion. Zinnober9 (talk) 13:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under BLP (most recent disruption is GENSEX-oriented, but over time it has been more broadly BLP-based) Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent misgendering of a trans BLP. Funcrunch (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS and RevDel what needs to be RevDel'ed Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection. Disruption by editor with dynamic IP, problems started again after recent semi-protection expired. Kathleen's bike (talk) 01:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit warring. Please lock page to prevent vandalism, edit warring, or other disruptive edits Aditiroykapoor (talk) 01:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also add CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace {{R from relative}} with:

{{Redirect category shell|
{{R from relative}}
{{R to anchor}}
{{R avoided double redirect|ComedyShortsGamer}}
{{R from personal name}}
}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Olatunji, Deji}}

As a side note, please could this redirect's talk page also be created with {{talk page of redirect}}? I was going to make this request there, but couldn't as it matches an entry on the title blacklist. All the best :) ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like MusikBot has added {{pp|small=yes}} below the redirect - please remove this when adding the wikitext above, as {{Redirect category shell}} auto-detects the current protection level. All the best, ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 21:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an ongoing edit war regarding the nationality of Changpeng Zhao. Users keep removing "Chinese" from being listed in the nationality section of his page. A source is provided that verifies he was born in China and resided in China. The page states numerous times that he was born in China and resided in China, but despite this the nationality information keeps being removed. Nationality: "The status of belonging to a particular nation by origin, birth, or naturalization." Bluecenote (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Bluecenote (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For one week. Yes, you. Per WP:ROLLINGSTONE we do not consider that magazine a reliable source for information like this. And per WP:3RRNO, no one who took it out was edit warring. And since it was on a BLP, a designated contentious topic area, and it involved nationality, I have blocked you for longer than I might otherwise since you made five reverts in one day. I have also left a CTOPS alert on your talk page, and will leave a CTOPS notice on the article talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued IP vandalism. Adding death date without reliable source and undid their edits, only for them to be ignored. BLP violations. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is vandalism and edits. I am the great-grandson of Jalal Baba and would like to have protection over it. Arafehrahat (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User "Chichifat" has engaged in multiple incidents of vandalism of this page with misleading and inaccurate claims that obviously violate NPOV requirements. There are multiple false claims that are continuously posted by repeatedly undoing content that abides by neutrality requirements.

The vandalism has also removed a vast amount of objectively-sourced information about this organization and its work in Canada.

Please see the Article's talk page for further information. Kindly request that this article be protected due to multiple vandalism incidents by this User "Chichifat" starting April 16, 2024.

Ottawacan (talk) 22:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Chichifat (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just these two in the last couple of days after relative months of minimal editing. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP persistently adding reference to school news blog. XabqEfdg (talk) 02:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I have warned the user about proper sourcing and the consequences if they keep this up, something that had not previously been done. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring. Sink Cat (talk) 05:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-running content warring with a variety of IPs, see 80.3.122.252 (talk · contribs). There's a lot of pejorative misuse of sources, [41] and some of it [42] is just egregious. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for 3 months: High level of IP vandalism and new user vandalism since previous protection expired. Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – And IP-hopping person keeps on changing this with no rhyme or reason. I thought that it was a test edit, so I tried to correct it, but it turns out that it's just someone who is causing pure disruption. I am on an editing restriction and will not be undoing his edits, but Jgstokes has also reverted and warned him. Please undo this last edit and semi-protect to avoid this sheer disruption. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 05:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (WP:ANEW would probably be the best destination if they continue.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
Justin (koavf)TCM 11:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit conflict with User:Less Unless. A few IPs here. BusterD (talk) 12:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IP addresses have been repeatedly adding bogus unsourced genres that have nothing to do with TV series at all nonstop. — YoungForever(talk) 14:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding unsourced content about MTV 80s started broadcasting in the United States and inserting incorrect picture format. –LDM2003 talk to me! 06:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Revision history shows persistent disruption from auto-confirmed accounts, who seem to be adding unsourced, or poorly sourced content. I think it's time to upgrade the protection to Indef, Extended-Confirmed. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No incidents of disruption since February. Only a half dozen edits of any kind. It appears the existing semi-protection is working. BusterD (talk) 12:05, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It keeps getting vandal edits which stay up for quite a while unfortunately. Would be good just to have a little protection on it. Thank you. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 13:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Second request for page protection, an IP Hopper keeps adding the exact same thing to the plot and you can't just block that one IP, they've had about 6 so far. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing WP:DOB violations and block evasion. Belbury (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is the target of an IP-hopper who insists that the subject is still alive. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps changing the largest city contrary to our sources, has been reverted by 3 different editors. Uses more than 1 IP-adress. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism now that he is back in the news. 164.64.118.102 (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of previous-behaviours stemming from previous page block. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Which will cover most of the remaining tour dates. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 21:58, 12 March 2024‎. Panian513 15:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of troll. v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 15:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. It was closed as speedy keep and now archived, so there's no reason for almost anyone to edit it and most certainly not an IP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs edit war over whether it was historically called "Istanbul" or "Constantinople", including adding editorializing comments into article text. 2620:0:1003:512:A1F0:86FC:6748:91E5 (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like some They Might Be Giants fans getting a little carried away. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dubious reports across Twitter, Facebook and Instagram reporting that she has died. As such, lots of IP addresses AND registered users trying to edit her page with a death date, even though no sources currently exist. Would be good if the page can be locked for 24 hours to allow only senior editors to amend it. 80.41.53.42 (talk) 18:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Falls within WP:CT/IPA and possibly also WP:CT/IRP. Many drive-by editors who unfortunately have not been constructive and make major changes to the article. Remsense 19:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice (IPA seems best fit, although this could conceivable come under not only IRP but A-A as well ... the case is slowly building for making almost everything from the Bosporus west to Afghanistan and Pakistan a CTOP area). Not logging yet since this is the first protection in a dozen years. Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please alter the following sentence: "Israel's upcoming offensive in Rafah, criticized by the international community, is nearing execution while ceasefire negotiations remain ongoing." However, on the Rafah offensive page, the lede reads "On 6 May 2024, Israel began a military offensive in and around the city of Rafah." Simply put, the Rafah offensive should no longer be characterized in the Israel-Hamas war article as "upcoming" if it is currently ongoing. JohnR1Roberts (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Because the administrators who monitor this page aren't involved with that article, it would be easier if you formulated requests in the form "change 'X' to 'Y'". ~Anachronist (talk) 18:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended Confirmed Protection: High level of sock vandalism. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 12:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/IPA IanDBeacon (talk) 13:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't look frequent enough for an increase to ECP. (I did update the CTOPS notice on the talk page to mention the semi-protection, though). Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP repeatedly replacing cited content with unsourced pov Fieryninja (talk) 19:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 20:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request the addition of a talk page on the Israel-Hamas war article that points out that the map on said article doesn’t show the Israeli evacuation order from Rafah and should be updated. LordOfWalruses (talk) 21:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is too vague. It is not clear what you want. Administrators here are not necessarily familiar with the subject article. Your request must be specific and complete, saying exactly what should be changed, and why, and what supports the change you want. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15 May 2024

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being targeted by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ksdccandrc. Page otherwise is rarely edited. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: TechSavy002 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef. Obvious sock, better to deal with them this way at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ongoing IP addition of unsourced material. Joeyconnick (talk) 18:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continuing with an autoconfirmed account. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm testing a script, and need a move protected page that I can mess with without disrupting anyone; I was hoping an admin would be willing to move protect this one for me? BilledMammal (talk) 23:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recurring POV disruption/vandalism, intermittently since last year at least (e.g.: [43], [44], [45], [46]) but more frequently since April ([47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]). The frequency goes up and down, but the recent editing history is now dominated by these tediously reverted IP edits. R Prazeres (talk) 20:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of tests bizzare non-English edits from IP Alexeyevitch(talk) 21:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Long term persistent vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 21:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalised in the same way by seven different new accounts, crudely named, over a period of two weeks. Suggesting protection time of greater duration than two weeks. signed, Willondon (talk) 22:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. @Ponyo: ECP was requested for this article if you want to consider ECP for this article and perhaps the other 2024 Summer Olympics articles as well. I don't have a strong opinion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full protection needed. Edit warring between 2 users. May require action against the users involved for the edit war and the accusations on the article's talk page. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 21:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If either editor resumes edit warring, please report the incident to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Outrage of the week. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 21:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An article skeptical of Letby’s guilt was published in The New Yorker over the weekend. It has been incorporated in the article with due weight. However, the recent publicity has attracted a number of IP editors and SPAs who are not following NPOV, DUE, or the consensus of a recent RFC regarding the wording of the opening sentence. Jfire (talk) 22:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent removal of sourced content by newly created accounts, happening across months GraziePrego (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: An anonymous user continues to make persistent efforts to remove the redirect. The subject lacks notability and was redirected in accordance with WP:ATD. GSS💬 05:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @GSS: I've protected the article, but it's time to explain the reversions to the other editor on user talk pages and in edit summaries (using plain English rather than cryptic abbreviations). Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of a non-notable person. ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user with a new account continues to undo edits without specifying a reason, although the result is written there, as well as sources that completely refute his additions are indicated.Dushnilkin (talk) 19:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. No one's used the talk page yet. I will leave a CTOPS notice on it, but the rest is up to you. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Revision war. RubberJackal (talk) 03:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's not clear which article you want protected of the above two articles, but to be clear, the request is denied for either article. Please do not edit war. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs in the same range or location (possibly the same editor) disrupting the page: [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], and [59] (#5 is clearly vandalism). They initially engaged on the talk page, then disengaged. Recommend several days of protection. GoneIn60 (talk) 03:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I just warned them about disruptive editing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Revision war. RubberJackal (talk) 03:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 06:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to be well under control now. Lectonar (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism BoldGnome (talk) 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because recent revision history does not show excessive disruptive editing within the last few months. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Gfoley4 as the admin who protected in 2011. I assume unprotection would be ok. Johnuniq (talk) 05:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Are you sure the lack of disruption isn't because of the protection? - Sumanuil. (talk to me)
Also, the abuse filter log shows a lot of disruptive activity for 10 years after the protection was applied, although nothing since 2021. There is absolutely nothing preventing the IP from making an edit request. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there hasn't been disruption since 2021, then maybe you or Gfoley, should at least consider unprotecting it. No? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't see why it would need to be unprotected when you can make an edit request on the talk page. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Protecting admin only editing rarely. OP: please use an edit request at need. Lectonar (talk) 07:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous or newly registered users. Sunrise In Brooklyn 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 10:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a00:23ee::/32 (talk · contribs). One-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Consistent BLP/RS violation by IPs Catalyzzt (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, IPs continue to add Sergio Pérez as part of a meme, unlikely to stop. Skjoldbro (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content blanking by unregistered user. Same section has previously been blanked multiple times in the past, most recently in April. Adam Black talkcontributions 14:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Assassination attempt brings vandals to Robert Fico page Stickhandler (talk) 17:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Earlier protected by pending changes (expired 10 April 2024), since then Frank Iero was added 5 times by accounts (one new, one awoken after a long time) and three IPs. There is no reliable evidence tht Iero is a stigmata. The Banner talk 18:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "tidal flow(traffic)" to "tidal flow (traffic)", yes the only difference is a space in the piped link which is ordinarily a cosmetic change that should be avoided, but in this case is needed as part of the WP:X3 process as the unspaced redirect will be deleted, thank you. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:64D4:1CAD:2D37:C84B (talk) 18:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Tollens (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keeps adding unsourced Box Office figures. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 07:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors making unsourced and disruptive edits. Ravensfire (talk) 12:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: repeated vandalism by IP and registered user. OrangKalideres (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Anzasquiddles (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Edit wars currently going on over whether Yasuke was a Samurai. Repeated edits in a short time period have been made to both change the article to call him a Samurai (using sources previously dismissed from inclusion in the article), and to add unnecessary and unsourced clarification that he was not a Samurai. 130.43.139.154 (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. TabahiKaBhagwan (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term IP vandalism. Skitash (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing, as well. Image warring. This article is the subject of a popular YouTube video (see article's talk page). Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP Vandals over replacing Nitish Rana by Sunil Narine for 2023. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 16:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been subjected to substatial, but subtle, vandalism from IP users over a protracted period. YorkshireExpat (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalisms and often unverified sources. Pepek94 (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 May 2024

Reason: Persistent submission of false information and vandalism due to the upcoming final of Conference Cup that has been scheduled to take place in Agia Sophia Stadium on 29 May 2024. Highly unlikely to stop until then. SportsGreece (talk) 15:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 03:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page should be fully-protected. 66.99.128.137 (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I don't see why this page needs to be fully protected when there has been no disruptive editing for years. Semi-protections is sufficient for now. The Night Watch (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect the page to Wikipedia talk:Sandbox by adding #REDIRECT [[Wikipedia talk:Sandbox]] to the top of the page. —Cyclonial (talk | contributions) 01:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have no idea why that wasn't done sooner. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Politically sensitive person, subject to repeated vandalism and political attacks by Chinese ultranationalists, but otherwise not a very actively edited article. ChromeGames (talk · contribs) 03:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 05:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent IP user adding random unsourced disclaimer to gossip to page. NoCringe (talk) 04:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP currently in the news, request autoconfirmed protection for an initial two-week period. 5225C (talk • contributions) 05:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 17:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained changes by IPs. Trivialist (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page vandalism by IP editors resumed after page protection expired. Sanglahi86 (talk) 21:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a one sided account orchestrated by Paul Hutchinson and Jimmy Rex and others. None of the accusations have been substantiated by court action. Additionally the article carries little information about Tim Ballard the altruistic work he has done and the factual details of rescue missions and the successes in his work with the DHS. 162.211.155.34 (talk) 02:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – The article has been the subject of IP edit warring as recently as March. Use the talk page to try to get your point accepted. In any case the article was semiprotected for six months in March by User:Daniel Case under WP:CT/AP, so it would take an appeal under those sanctions. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ovechkin like Crosby and Gretzky is considered a generational talent and protecting his article makes sense to prevent any unidentified IP numbers from making any unncessary changes or vandalism Gymrat16 (talk) 23:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 08:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to subject's non-binary identity; appears to have been previously protected however protections were removed for some reason and vandalism has reappeared Sims2aholic8 (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The protection kerfuffle resulted from the article being moved around a bit. Lectonar (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page must be permanently extended-protected in accordance with WP:AIPIA. Also, a related page is missing its {{pp-extended}} protection template.102.156.0.31 (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of spam links. John of Reading (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. EndzoneEnthusiast 08:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit more than 2 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated, disruptive edits, ignoring a conversation that's already been decided in the Talk section. ChrisMeabe (talk) 09:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ilya Sutskever. Mellk (talk) 02:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since Albini's death, at least three users have attempted to add unverified info from a Medium post stating that he is a pedophile. The edits are serious BLP violations and the post itself does not represent Albini's character accurately. It should also be noted that the author of the Medium post, MoonMetropolis, is a convicted terrorist, so their words should not be taken lightly. Carlinal (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IPs making personal attacks. BrokenSquarePiece (complete me) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has now veered into massive amounts of off-topic, WP:NOTFORUM discussion. BrokenSquarePiece (complete me) 13:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. I’ve already had to warn a couple IPs for personal attacks, as well as remove one. Yoshi24517 (mobile) (talk) (Very Busy) 15:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is sorely needed, please semi this Talk page asap. Toadspike (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's see if we can get all these people to the talk page. Moxy🍁 02:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For now: both participating users have been warned about edit-warring, and will be blocked with the next occurrence. Lectonar (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 02:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 92.40.201.57 (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing redirect despite two previous AfD discussions. CNMall41 (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden flood of vandalism by both IPs and new users. Felida97 (talk) 19:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2024

Reason: Persistent disruption from multiple IPs over the past month: [60][61][62][63][64][65]. Generalrelative (talk) 18:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 23:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is the target of IP vandals registered to Nigerian provider(s). Skywatcher68 (talk) 22:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To readd a piece of major info. LupusKinght666 (talk) 20:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Additionally, please carefully read WP:ER; you're going to need to be much more specific than "a major piece of info." OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target of IP vandalism, disruptive editing, and socks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 06:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject has been in the news lately, which has drawn anon and new users who are vandalizing the article. Slugger O'Toole (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term consistent vandalism attempts to insert racist meme into lede by both new account holders and IPs. Might benefit from a stint at extended confirmed to break the cycle. Simonm223 (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please protect the other language versions of this page before americans get to them and start an edit war on those too. 2600:1007:B0BB:12FE:4098:14EC:4B11:D9A0 (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The English Wikipedia doesn’t have control over foreign language articles. BrokenSquarePiece (complete me) 23:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This page is only for protection requests on English Wikipedia. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – ITN over alleged affair & leading to numerous reverts. Will120 (talk) 00:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also added CTOPS notice to talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – ITN over alleged affair & leading to revert. Will120 (talk) 00:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 00:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pending changes protection: Influx of vandalism from recent game announcement. Some of the charming comments include [66], [67], [68]. Recommending pending changes instead of semi-protection because IPs are making good contributions too (eg. [69]). Egsan Bacon (talk) 01:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. for three days. Let's see how things go after that. Daniel Case (talk) 02:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 02:52, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sjö (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent and daily vandalism by unregistered users. Needs an enhanced protection. AideDésintéressée (talk) 11:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP Vandalism + Edit warring returned since the previous protection expired; One more year of protection is necessary. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 16:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry which has not been solved by the previous Pending Changes protection. AriTheHorseTalk to me! 12:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We don't need to go to ECP to stop IP socks. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Targetted by Srimonbanik2007 sock puppets. Ravensfire (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple recent IP vandal juvenile attacks. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBECR. S0091 (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC). S0091 (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive IP editing from multiple addresses this week. glman (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also be putting a CID CTOPS notice on the talk page and giving Braintic an alert for this if he hasn't already gotten one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case Why would you not give the other person an alert ... the one who was actually making edits contrary to the rules which I was trying to fix? What is your basis for deciding who is correct, if not the rules regarding non-notable parents and children in the infobox? Braintic (talk) 02:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Editorial policies and conduct policies do not intertwine much. You are correct that I should give Modernist the same alert. Will do. Daniel Case (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Where's my barnstar? Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks button killed the barnstar / Thanks button killed the barnstar / Coders came and broke your heart / Oh-a-a-a-oh! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lot of Unreferenced IP edits and doesn't even know if it is true or not. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someonewhoisusinginternet (talk | contributions) 12:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4065:28E:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 02:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "the The Wall Street Journal" to "The Wall Street Journal". This typo is at the beginning of the "Reported atrocities" section. Samuel Christy (talk) 04:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 04:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple IPs + a new account changing the DoB, without sources, contrary to the sourced DoB Arjayay (talk) 19:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay: The reference is a mystery and the old discussions on talk are inconclusive. Perhaps it would be better to remove the birth date? At least there should be a new discussion on talk to spell out how the date is known and why the conflicting sources should be ignored. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trolling. Dronebogus (talk) 02:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I've seen far worse on other talk pages. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Target for people uploading their own photos for the meme factor. Popular vandalism target. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request one civilian employee of the israeli defence ministry was killed and two injured in action in gaza and should be added to israeli casualties, separate new category from IDF. See link

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/defense-ministry-contractor-succumbs-to-wounds-sustained-in-southern-gaza-mortar-attack/

2605:B100:D20:FD72:0:3:45F:C701 (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm assuming this was meant for Timeline of the Israel–Hamas war (7 May 2024 – present)? If so, looks to have already been done. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 05:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 08:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Noorullah (talk) 03:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring. Agpshi (talk) 07:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – already protected, but long protection log due to being controversial umpire. Will120 (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You sure you're in the right section? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined The last edit was on 23 April 2024 and semi-protection expires on 7 July 2024. Nothing more is needed at the moment. Johnuniq (talk) 06:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently some unregistered user adding unsourced material without providing any proper sources witgout any reason so its request to increase the protection level of this particular article Truthfindervert (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @Truthfindervert: Please start by notifying the user about our sourcing requirements and that we don't accept copyright violations. If they continue after being warned, please report them to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Risker. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page is being mediated by only one person which could cause biases. Protection should be removed or several people should mediate to prevent probable biases. 2001:8003:607A:5D01:E87E:9317:D688:1AD6 (talk) 07:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Not a reason for unprotection; things were getting out of control, so full protection is fully warranted. courtesy @Favonian:. Lectonar (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently some unregistered user adding unsourced material without providing any proper sources without any reason so its request to increase the protection level of this particular article Syedmuhammadqadiri (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit by an unregistered user more than 2 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP and new accounts adding serious BLP violations. ECP or the like for a bit would give them time off to go elsewhere. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 15:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Favonian (talk) 15:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This wikipedia entry was protected for a month after an anonymous person made edits which were unsourced and defamatory. That protection has expired and the same person (who is under an ongoing police investigation for online harassment as well as a pending non-molestation order application) has recommenced their previous hijacking of the page. 82.206.163.221 (talk) 17:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Sanctioned topic - WP:RUSUKR. Primium (talk) 04:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs insist upon adding protagonist info despite MOS:FILMCAST stating "Subjective interpretation using labels such as protagonist, antagonist, villain, or main character, should be avoided. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Aggressive POV pushing / OR by an IP hopping editor about the software author's politics. MrOllie (talk) 19:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example of what I'm talking about. It's a blatant BLP violation. - MrOllie (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs continually adding protagonist & antagonist info here as well. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 'protagonist' stuff is a hallmark of an LTA called Jinnifer, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer/Archive. MrOllie (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These appear to be unrelated; the most recent IP is registered to schools in Manitoba.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One IP from yesterday at Will Turner and from May 12 here shares the same geographical area as the LTA, though.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They tend to use VPNs and proxies these days. MrOllie (talk) 21:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Non-official sources reporting he’s signed on as Maple Leafs HC, which IP editors are continuously adding to the article. The Kip 20:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems at least one LTA has found this page. DatGuy hasn't edited in about two weeks but I doubt he'll object. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the edits were correct and not vandalism. Charles has three children, not two, and he did divorce Tetyana and had a relationship with someone else with whom he shares a child and whom he left mid-pregnancy. He wants to hide this information because he wants a picture perfect bio but people deserve to know the truth about their politicians. 2A00:23EE:2218:FD3:A528:9F83:6245:898B (talk) 18:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 May 2024

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Lorry Gundersen: Can you please point out specific recent edits that are vandalism and briefly explain why they are vandalism? And which ones are from autoconfirmed editors? Large portions of the article are unsourced so it is difficult to tell. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Other administrators: please feel free to resolve this as you see fit based on the response, especially if I take too long to respond. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Several NPOV violations and vandalism cases. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 14:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war on Yasuke is spreading to this article. For context, see WP:ANI#Talk:Yasuke is a complete dumpster fire and [70]. Thibaut (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 23:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disuprtive editing, and long-term violation of MOS policy. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Livelikemusic: Please stop edit warring. Please start using talk pages to discuss disagreements. Please read the definition of vandalism before you warn another person incorrectly. This is not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Full creation protection seems unjustified. The corresponding mainspace page is unprotected and no one has recreated it. I personally do not intend to create an article on this topic but in case an autoconfirmed editor does, it would be reasonable to drop the SALT level to semi to match mainspace. Protecting admin has been desysoped so I brought it here directly. Nickps (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nickps: The SALT does seem justifiable, given three speedy deletions. I do agree with you that full-protection is unnecessary for it, however. Semi-protection would seem to me to be too low; maybe XCP? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even that sounds wrong to me to be honest. Protecting the draft but not the mainspace article is a weird thing to do. It's essentially directing any spam to mainspace. Since there has been no such spam all this time, I'd argue that the protection has outlived its purpose. But, lowering the protection would still be a positive in any case so I won't get too hung up on the level. Do XCP if you think it's right. Nickps (talk) 16:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like there's been any attempt to re-create the mainspace page after the AfD (which, I should note, post-dates the most recent draft deletion). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Meh This is one of those cases who pop up from time to time where I am always on the fence. Yes, the page shouldn't be protected anymore (or only at lower level); on the other hand there is no expressed need to create a page under said draft. Lectonar (talk) 07:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected. Given that there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary and we have a request in front of us to unprotect, it seems unduly bureaucratic to wait for someone to take interest in the topic. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards ceremonies articles between 2005 and 2018

Reason: Those pages have been protected by a user who is no longer active for the past 3 years. My question is, is the indefinite protection still necessary for the time being? I can already see that 2007 and 2012 editions have had their protection settings revoked. Furthermore, I checked the page logs of later ceremonial events and realized that they were protected at least once, except for the current year's page which is presently a redirect.102.159.242.79 (talk) 21:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Removed the semi-protection as a trial (except from the 2018 edition, which was already unprotected but had indefinite pending-changes). Edits like Special:Diff/1214855715 and Special:Diff/1222933930 on similar pages make me think that the chance of a return to disruption is pretty possible, but not enough to keep it under semi-protection indefinitely. This seems like the most painless way forward: the pending-changes will expire on their own if there are no issues; if there are issues, it can be done indefinitely. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed within hours of expiry of the previous 1-week protection. As the disruption comes from new accounts that are already autoconfirmed, ECP protection might be necessary. — kashmīrī TALK 09:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – [71][72][73][74][75][76]. — hako9 (talk) 01:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant nonsense by IPs. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With the I'll keep correcting. Game on son edit summary, the disruptive IP is making a promise that they won't stop. M.Bitton (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. And will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism or addition of poor quality content immediately after a protection expired. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 10:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite surprised this wasn't indefinitely protected. Sigma is, but not this (yet). Schestos (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated BLP violation (i.e. addition of unsourced date of birth) by several IPs and also User:Pumpkin7135 GrindtXX (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request ECP due to vandalism and unexplained and falsely pretensed removal of content by SPA. Borgenland (talk) 15:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting extended-confirmed protection for this page. Reasons: preventing vandalism, Israel/Palestine conflict, etc. Yello231 (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today is IDAHOBIT and the article has received multiple instances of vandalism as a result. Raladic (talk) 22:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is covered by at least one arbitrary enforcement I believe. Schestos (talk) 03:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined It is covered by GENSEX, but it seems that this only happens on the day every year and the article is pretty quiet otherwise. Keep it mind for next year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 00:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And no relevance in article to current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism almost daily. Four previous protections. Schestos (talk) 03:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The death toll statistics are presented in an imbalanced way. Include the israeli statistics for the palestinian casualties. Egaga1 (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is not an actionable request. The administrators here are not involved in that article and do not determine how content is presented. You must create a request of the form "change X to Y" and cite appropriate sources. You have not done this. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On main page for DYK, just getting driveby poor quality edits to add puffery. Shut it down to anon IPs until tomorrow or until off DYK, please. Montanabw(talk) 16:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – off the main page now. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent spamming with promotional content, dating back to August 2023. Likelihood of socking merits a look. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:5019:C010:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editors have noted changes to the page that may be from a political opponent. Right now the page has been edited to focus mostly on political positions rather than on the person's biography. Protection should be installed immediately to prevent any further vandalism. ProfessorKaiFlai (talk) 05:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both Thisistheway2023 and Payback2024 indeffed as NOTHERE Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is attracting various promotional editors & vandals. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject to vandalism and addition of unsourced material by unregistered/new users. FrB.TG (talk) 22:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Every now and then I have a look at this page to see what's being vandalised frequently out of curiosity. I'm very surprised this wasn't indefinitely done given his fame as Spider-Man. Schestos (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 46.44.180.233 (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. 46.44.180.233 (talk) 02:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article is already Semi-Protected. There is no need to ask to protect it, as it is already protected. Are you asking for an upgrade in protection (such as Extended-Confirmed)? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistently unexplained content removal in Casting section from multiple IPs from two separate ranges (2001:4455:4E0:B600:0:0:0:0/64 and 2001:FD8:1712:C8C0:0:0:0:0/64). Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just happened again with this nonsense. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 10:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:35, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various disruptive IPs have been adding protagonist info here as well. Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First specify if the protection should be temporary or indefinate 70.50.199.125 (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent and repeated target of an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 11:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of ip vandalish Syedmuhammadqadiri (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism motivated by nationalistic discourses Pierrevang3 (talk) 10:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 12:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 10:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Emotions are running to high here while there is no discussion on the talk page about the additions. The Banner talk 11:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock and meat DE on a project page.  // Timothy :: talk  20:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done with the discussion closed as a delete, the sock activity seems to have stopped. – robertsky (talk) 11:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Highly consulted page, now featured on the front page, about an ongoing event, with IPs starting to editwar to add unsourced information. Perhaps you could restrict it to users registered for over 4 days, like on the French Wikipedia. Shoshin000 (talk) 13:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are targeting this template, due to the upcoming final next week. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 06:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – robertsky (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Japansonglove. Wikishovel (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User(s) blocked: Luisuaphahoai (talk · contribs). – robertsky (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I strongly advise my request you this article needs to be decrease from 2 years to 1 day. It should be reverted the last revision that it needs proper cleanup as well as 1st Nunavut Legislature, 2nd Nunavut Legislature, 3rd Nunavut Legislature and 4th Nunavut Legislature. 102.186.252.41 (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:5th Nunavut Legislature is not protected. The banned user, whose activities made the block necessary, is still very active in the sockpuppetry field, which makes unprotection inadvisable. Favonian (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Shadow4dark (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent unreferenced additions to BLP since 01:20, 30 April 2024‎. Panian513 15:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed shortly after protection expired. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:10, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Personal commentary, unsourced and unhelpful changes by IP users. Mann Mann (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and disruptive editing. Users are consistently adding to the first paragraph claims that Palmer is one of the best in the world, with weak sourcing such as his own manager and fans. This is being restored several times with no discussion, and it costs time for users to read and evaluate the weak sources for such a strong claim. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Election promo (Election are on 7 June 2024). The Banner talk 15:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. –Sincerely, A Lime 18:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Years of IP vandalism. Most of these geolocate to various parts of Pakistan and may be current or former students. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 03:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent false reporting of the former U.S. president's death posted by IPs. Talk page was previously semiprotected for the same reason over a month ago. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from anonymous Pakistan-based IP accounts replacing Kashmiri 'militants' with Kashmiri 'freedom fighters' in contravention of WP:FREEDOMFIGHTER. RightQuark (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Leschnei (talk) 20:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moro died 45 years ago. BLP doesn't apply. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A newbie keep moving draft to main namespace. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Maineartists (talk) 20:48, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – anon editor (likely a block evasion as well, see Talk:Peranakan Chinese and Visnu92) trying to force a translation of mswiki article on here despite 3 separate editors reverting this action and also have left an edit warring notice on the talk page (also like IDHT or /ignore issue). – robertsky (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also to note that the IP address belongs to a mobile telco, which means it can be switched to another /64 IPv6 range at a moment's notice, (and if my experience with this telco is of any indication, the IP address may change within 24 hours anyway), hence not requesting on blocking of IP address(es). – robertsky (talk) 08:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2405:3800:84B:1E32:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Let's see if this person can do this, and is willing to. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also request below for Loom (Imagine Dragons album) and Mercury – Acts 1 & 2. S0091 (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Imagine Dragons (Dan, Wayne and Ben) (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Brettandelle, SPI. See also The Killers which is EC protected due to their disruption. S0091 (talk) 16:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Imagine Dragons (Dan, Wayne and Ben) (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. indef. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This talk page is target of repeated spam and disruption by IPs, please look through the revision history. Requesting semi-protection for the talk page also. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I can hardly imagine a situation in which we protect a talk page indefinitely. Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19 May 2024

Semi-protection, Recent wave of IP vandalism. VirtualVagabond (talk) 12:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But I did leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Brettandelle, SPI. See also The Killers which is EC protected due to their disruption. S0091 (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Imagine Dragons (Dan, Wayne and Ben) (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by an IP. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBPAK. I think this is the 4th (maybe 5th) bio page of a Pakistani current or former Supreme Court Justice I've protected this year... El_C 22:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Disruptive unsourced edits. It comes from a IP range that's already partially blocked.

Asking for a temporary semi-protection. It should be enough. Also take a look at that IP range as they are vandalizing quite a few Wikipedia articles.

WikiEditor1890 (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:8001:B202:3294:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for duration of existing block. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Asking for a page protection for persistent sockpuppetry. Two different Ip users have added a large portion of unreferenced material. Plus a new user User:Squirrell2, has similar editing patterns to 3 editors who edited the article in the past, that were blocked for sockpuppetry.[77] Hotwiki (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism following the Panther's recent win over the Boston Bruins. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello. The contents of this article have been removed. Also, the photo has been removed from Wikidata. By WP:VD please global block User:Knowledgebase75 and protect the article. Claggy (talk) 20:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, if the user returns and continues removing text they must be blocked but protection is not needed at the moment. The image btw was clearly a copyright violation, I deleted it from Commons. Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter Thank you for quick check and pure management. Claggy (talk) 20:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – more "He's a samurai. No, he's not." edit warring. CRBoyer 21:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this request. Thibaut (talk) 21:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A third. It just came off being fully, gold-locked protected and is now wide open. Not good. Marcus Markup (talk) 22:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adding my support for semi protection because of continued vandalism by IP users RomeshKubajali (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately after the 3-day full protection expired edit warring resumed. Given that most of the disruption is from IPs and brand-new users, semi or ECP would probably suffice rather than full protection. (merged from duplicate request) Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, going on for the last 3 weeks. BLAIXX 18:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Relentless small edits, absent edit summary or cites, by anon-ip's, for several months. As a BLP it requires more editor effort to verify legitimacy or even reasons for changes. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. EC isn't necessary if the edits are mostly coming from the kind of accounts you describe. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 22:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: continuous high levels of disruptive editings and edit warrings from both ips and accounts, autoconfirmed lock is probably for the best 24.23.210.86 (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were 3 reverts in the last 2 weeks. Please don't make spurious posts to this page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – User with a possible conflict of interest constantly moving to the main namespace. They were asked not to move and submit for a review instead but there is no effect of the request. Also there is a case of socking as well. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Kazanchis‎. GSS💬 08:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure, it is you that disturbing here, you just felt am COI and you move my contributions as you liked! Is that how Wikipedia works? The Kazanchis (talk) 08:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Let's let the SPI resolve it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – User with a possible conflict of interest constantly moving to the main namespace. They were asked not to move and submit for a review instead but there is no effect of the request. Also there is a case of socking as well. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Kazanchis‎. GSS💬 08:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined As with above, let's let the SPI play out. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock keeps editing the article and Talk:Vaishnavism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for the talk page, I have blocked 2409:4071:0:0:0:0:0:0/33 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) from it and the article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs vandalizing 'owner' section of infobox GoodDay (talk) 03:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Indonesian IPs often vandalizing that page for Indonesian Customs' (Bea Cukai) controversies since 1 May 2024 Thoriq1024 (talk) 04:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. Mazewaxie (talkcontribs) 18:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) At least one party has added promotional text to the article. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Also autoconfirmed editors are involved so extended confirmed protection is advised. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: FarEasternMarket (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. from article for three months.
User(s) blocked: Frankdgreen (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. from article for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nswix (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have cooled off now that the fight's over. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just reverted another. How about just a couple days? Nswix (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Ludwigbiggestfan (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Indefinitely.
User(s) blocked: 207.180.179.50 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent unexplained edits by IPs. Trivialist (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2806:2F0:A1C0:EAD2:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi Protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Disruptive edits regarding a Ni Hao Kai-Lan movie and reboot continues after IP's rangeblock expired. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:8990:7EE5:4565:54DB (talk) 23:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1702:3F10:77F0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of nonsense by an IP-hopping vandal. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1009:A120:0:0:0:0:0/46 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been some IPs that have been vandalizing and adding unsourced content on this page. I'm requesting it to be protected because I'm concerned that these IPs will keep going. Thanks. HJHooker00 (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The page does not appear to be protected for some reason. HJHooker00 (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Now it is. Favonian (talk) 10:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of nonsense from an IP-hopping vandal. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP's, page has been protected before. Noorullah (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/IPA. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continuous addition of unsourced content by IPs. CNMall41 (talk) 06:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Dhirendra Sengar (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruption by an IP-hopper; see edit history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 08:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 119.94.160.0/19 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, deleting well-sourced criticism, potential COI editing, etc. Félix An (talk) 07:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one IP edit this month, and that was four days ago. Favonian (talk) 11:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because .......many users want to add more information to this page. 103.19.48.97 (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Chitral is not protected. Favonian (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

change the word 'Maghrebi to Moroccan' Change 'Marinid Sultanate to Morocco'

Jihanysta (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – The article is not currently protected, but you are temporarily blocked for edit warring on that article! Favonian (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring between autoconfirmed users (and one IP). Requesting temporary ECP. RomeshKubajali (talk) 12:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High amount of unconfirmed edits from ip users, to much vandalism DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 12:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Unless I am missing something, there has not been an edit since late December 2023. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption over the past at least year Makeandtoss (talk) 13:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 15:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It's going to be contentious due to the Israel-Hamas war and has had IP vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Bedivere (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Requesting extended confirmed protection contentious topic WP:CT/IRP. Ecrusized (talk) 16:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. One week semi. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why??? I can see two minor instances of silliness in the whole edit history, and one of those was reverted by an IP. I thought preemptive protection was not allowed (granted, I've been away from Wikipedia for a while, so maybe it now is). A far as I can see, there is no valid basis for protecting this article at the moment. MidnightBlue (Talk) 16:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Klinetalkcontribs 17:01, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Regular additions of unsourced content and vandalism now the season has finished. I would protect myself but I've been heavily involved with editing the page today. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 19:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced BLP additions calling him dead instigated by IPs and new, underactive accounts. Borgenland (talk) 16:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Death reported by several sources, incl. News24. No other cause for protection at present. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Squeakachu (talk) 19:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: High level of IP vandalism Gottagotospace (talk) 20:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing for the last couple days; users putting in an end date for the series, despite there being no official confirmation from Disney, or anyone working on the show, that it has been cancelled. Seems like this will continue unless serious action is taken, such as a year-long page protection. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see any reason currently for extended confirmed protection Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been subject to several reverts by laymen enthusiasts of the company to include things that don't represent what Wikipedia is. Please check the revert history since the beginning of May. NHPluto (talk) 20:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

helicopter crash Iyielikes (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ebrahim Raisi is not protected, and there is a section about this there. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Nothing to do. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 18:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary extended-confirmed protection as speculation is being added. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second this. Arbitration enforcement WP:CT/IRP. Ecrusized (talk) 21:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: user named Milkdrop3 keeps adding irrelevant info and self promotion to article 217.155.19.212 (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Mifter (talk) 19:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to false claims of his death following a helicopter crash. Almost 45 edits in 60 minutes, with no official trustworthy sources confirming this information. NICTON t (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected, as WP:ARBIRP, but aiming for a short-term ECP upgrade, 2024 Varzaqan helicopter crash-related. El_C 22:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20 May 2024

Reason: Ongoing insertion of unsourced material by IP. Borgenland (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. We don't usually protect on account of just one user/IP (usually there are several to qualify for it). El_C 22:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per ARBPIA and a very continuous topic. I've added the ARBPIA template to the talk page. Similar to other Hamas-related articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No edits for a week. El_C 22:16, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is always edited by BJP'S Blind followers and those are misleading like they saying the term Andh bhakt was made by Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance but at that time the political alliance was not even established not even formed didn't exist. They just want to change it because it does fill the requirements. I request please protect this page. Therealbey (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Not sure what is meant by always, Therealbey — wasn't the page created earlier in the month? Anyway, we don't usually protect on account of just one user (usually there are several). El_C 22:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 22:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Possibly all from the same person with a dynamic IP. Gottagotospace (talk) 22:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think I might've accidentally unprotected it when doing an undo of a vandal's edit, can you please check? Gottagotospace (talk) 22:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, disregard my concern. I was just worried because I didn't see the lock icon. All good. Carry on! Gottagotospace (talk) 22:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, you can't actually affect a protection without sysop permission; the tag is cosmetic only. Best, El_C 22:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes protection is not sufficient in this case. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel needed for some edits. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. REVDELs done. El_C 22:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Anonymous IP has reverted edits two times, it will undoubtedly continue. Trying to avoid edit warring. skarz (talk) 14:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I did leave them a note concerning conflict of interest editing, however. (diff) If issues persist, might be worth bringing this to the attention of WP:COIN. El_C 22:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A4C9:D371:2417:8109 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 22:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Israel-Palestine conflict, modern politics User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 22:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism spanning a couple days. Most of them are making the same joke about him "owning" another team, so temporary protection for several days will hopefully do the trick. Gottagotospace (talk) 22:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS under WP:CT/CID Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See ITN. Rampant speculation about the president's death. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is in response to a current event ... let's see how it plays out. I will leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Despite being turned down yesterday because "the event was over", it's still seeing IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 23:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lots of IP vandalism. Shouldn't all policy and drama boards enjoy permanent semi-protection? -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 00:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sink Cat (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes does not seem sufficient. Most of the recent history is vandalism and reverting vandalism. The name just invites more. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. After the protection has expired, IPs keep adding unsourced content in the article. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- LuK3 (Talk) 04:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Srimonbanik2007 sock puppets. Ravensfire (talk) 01:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both articles. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Sudden influx of vandalism from several IPs and vandalism-only new accounts. Egsan Bacon (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP users targeting this article as their hobby. Mann Mann (talk) 03:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-Changes Protection . IP vandalism or unconsctrutive edit. IP changed the show's end date. It has been reverted, but it keeps happening. There hasn't been enough disruption to justify Semi-protection. If you look at the revision history you will see that the end date was changed from 2013 to 2018. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 02:16, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Temporary semi-protection hasn't seemed to work here. Tollens (talk) 04:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think you meant pending changes. Semi is effective against IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I did mean semi but might not've looked far enough back in the history. During the most recent period where the article was semi-protected, there were a couple accounts gaming autoconfirmed to edit the article. This looks like a relatively recent thing though so maybe extended-confirmed protection would be a bit much right now. Tollens (talk) 05:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When accounts game autoconfirmed they can and should have it revoked. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP editor returned with a new account "Asonnlakn" and added same unreliable source and content despite the explanation on the talk page. Persistent re-adding of same unreliable source and content. Georgeee101 (talk) 04:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. If you look at the revision history, there appears to be disruption. Extend the protection level to Extended-Confirmed 70.50.199.125 (talk) 03:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing anything anywhere near the sort of disruption that would require EC, much less the existing level of protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just those two edits and then they stopped. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the person is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.58.90.249 (talk) 06:19, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: That's not really a reason, especially given the circumstances. Also, I assume you mean Ebrahim Raisi, not an article that doesn't exist. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Ebrahim Raisi is not protected. Favonian (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Heavily edited, due to assuming the acting president of Iran position when Ebrahim Raisi died. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 13:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 13:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been a significant legal judgement in Scotland regarding the ERCC which has important knock on effects for politics in Scotland and the UK. This page being protected and isolated has meant other Wikipedia's are unable to update the page and add the judgement to Wikipedia. 82.10.58.36 (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 11:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism by multiple IP. —Loginnigol 06:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two months of IP users adding fake info about a fifth season. No sources to back it up. Primary source, Netflix, has also made no mention of it. X201 (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:08, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been repeatedly vandalized by 119.155.*.* for almost a week now; warning them is pointless because they keep changing their address. —Bruce1eetalk 11:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please Brainko22 (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassment from WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 15:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption by WP:LTA/DTHD. (delta • tc) 18:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is simultaneously semi-protected as well as pending protected, both with indefinite deadlines. I thought there should be only one type of edit-protection, if not one indefinite and the other time-based like the page kate Ryan.102.159.242.79 (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected, though still under pending-changes. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: At the suggestion of Encoded I am requesting protection for Valerie Jarrett due to repeated IP vandalism. It's taken the same form, [78] changing Jarrett's middle name to Caesar. For full transparency, I do have a COI as my firm has been hired by the Obama Foundation to assist with seeking changes to both the Obama Foundation and Valerie Jarrett articles. I have fully disclosed all my efforts. SKDKRachel (talk) 18:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Valereee (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous instances of vandalism and/or tendentious editing from multiple IPs over the past few weeks because of disagreements concerning Israel. Some of these attempt to add information that is not supported by the cited source, while others (notably the most recent at 13:25, 18 May 2024) are blatant instances of vandalism that harm the article as a whole (e.g. swapping country names in the population table). TheUnabashedUkrainian (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Once again IPs/socks keep adding unsourced content. It's been protected before, needs to be increased. Valereee (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, let us see whether this one would help Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Thehamid has been consistently reverting content back despite being warned and being part of a discussion on the article talk page. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User has violated WP:3RR - I have submitted a report at The edit warring noticeboard. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what sparked this off but multiple anons have had to be reverted on this today. Looks like a clear candidate for a temporary anon block. KylieTastic (talk) 20:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 May 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Repeated attempts (and subsequent reversions) to change "English" to "Irish" by IP editors Adam Black talkcontributions 13:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:PIA due to Shields' activity on social media. B3251 (talk) 18:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS, although it seems AP is more (ahem) apt. Daniel Case (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and vandalism in past two days due to a lot of media reports about him leaving PSG. I expect more disruptions in the near future. Protect for a period of 1 week if possible, until media reports calm down. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since my last request for protection there has been a significant amount of IP vandalism, some of which violate BLP policies Connorcp (talk) 10:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nationality warring. Nswix (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is not needed, because it protects a lie, while branding any counterargument "a conspiracy" 2001:56A:F282:9E00:E570:CFE4:6CF2:502E (talk) 23:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Clearly, protection is needed. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: recurring IP disruptive edits in the past week. Ippantekina (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are targeting this Template also; as the Playoffs are scheduled to take place this week. See revision history Also, this template is transcluded into a semi-proteceted page. It should be protected as well. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 11:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be getting hit with persistent vandalism. Blocks are ineffectual as edits are coming from varied IPs. Temporary locks are also ineffectual as it gets vandalized literally seconds after unlocking. I don't want to keep playing whack-a-mole with this article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also left CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism; multiple different IP Addresses are used to vandalize the page Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 16:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of repeated IP vandalism despite very clear note. Anwegmann (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An FL being targeted by the IPs due to the Playoffs which are scheduled to take place this week. Vestrian24Bio (UTACS) 17:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs and one recently registered editor are now trying to add antagonist and unsourced info to this article. Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term disruption/spam/nonsense edits. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we protect the page you won't be allowed to edit it either. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen several IPs ask for protection here and they knew about the side effects. My protection is a bit more than needed but perhaps it will break a habit. Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you--I'm more than okay with that. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 18:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost instantly as the semi expired more IP edits poured in and wrote obnoxious stuff on the page once more. There is really no reason for this page to be unprotected cuz the IP editors do absolutely nothing except write something dumb on the page OR they add artists to the roster that aren't actually on the roster (there was even an editor who had an account that was so desperate to make his façade that he was part of Opium convincing that he even uploaded his own music to streaming services with the label name "opium" in the notes and then attempted to use this as a "source" for this page). Second Skin (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by IPs, likely blocked sock Muuse8 (talk · contribs) see SPI Muuse8. Insists that See also goes before Notable people. Adakiko (talk) 21:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS per ARBHORN Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anon editors making repeated unsourced changes to tables in the article, e.g. in the month of May: [79][80][81][82][83][84][85]. This is covered by WP:GS/PAGEANTS community sanctions. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. and logged. Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring by IPs Adakiko (talk) 00:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:FORUM violations and vandalism by IPs Borgenland (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing a lot of it save that one recent edit. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for semi-protection to stop a vandal using an IP range to vandalize this and Albert Brooks, and edit war at these pages. Mr Fink (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:205:457D:6850:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by SCottishFinnishRadish. for a day. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for semi-protection to stop a vandal using an IP range to vandalize this and The Secret Life of Pets 2, and edit war at these pages. Mr Fink (talk) 16:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:205:457D:6850:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by SCottishFinnishRadish. for a day. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopper keeps adding unsourced information despite requests in the article to provide sources. The Banner talk 09:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The range has now moved into vandalism. The Banner talk 10:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 62.74.0.0/18 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for the remainder of their current partial block Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP targeting Mpox Virus pages. Untamed1910 (talk) 02:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandal that consistently has targeted these Mpox pages over the course of the last year. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs blanking the page. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced material, following press speculation, at end of season. Egghead06 (talk) 11:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing much from the past couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent revisions by 3 IPS, even though another user stated in their talk page of the matter. Something strange is also going on with between the iP and the user mentioned because they're listed on ANI GoodHue291 (talk) 20:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:85F:ECD7:D600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours after violating 3RR. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This vandal has done this a couple times before today. Semi-protection is the only way to keep at bay. Vandal's edits need to be revdel'ed too. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 03:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bibliomaniac15, it was vandalised just as recently as yesterday with the same racist comments. Same editor, different IP address. What is the point of playing whack-a-mole every time with these articles? --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations. KH-1 (talk) 06:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is not longer necessary as even today’s official statement by the International Criminal Court notes when prosecuting Hamas leaders notes with a cacveat that “The Panel notes the Prosecutor’s statement that his investigations continue, including in relation to evidence of sexual violence on 7 October itself.” i.e.it is still at investigation levels so they are nothing more than allegations Lf8u2 (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: This is not the place to challenge CTOPS actions. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There's just no way this will be unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Current edit war regarding spelling of two characters' last names. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: target of vandalism (mainly by IPs) Emdosis (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism by autoconfirmed users Daisytheduck (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Dynamic IP creating article at the redirect. There is a draft for the article that should be worked on. Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1002:B000:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same as the Mpox vandal. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Also see AN entry. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2A02:85F:ECD7:D600:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours for violating 3RR on another article as noted above. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semiprotected in 2011 due to some kind of trial. I can't find anything that indicates a trial is ongoing into the present day. William Graham talk 15:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was semi-protected due to the end of the CRASHlock trial. See Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment February 2011/Archive 3 for more details. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I read those links and I'm still confused. So consider this  Request withdrawn? William Graham talk 17:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to clarify. The article was placed under CRASHlock as a result of the initial trial of it back in 2009-11. After the trial was forcibly terminated by RfC months after it was supposed to end, the semi-protection was put in place to replace it. Odds are good that there may be a case for unprotection at this time, after almost 13 years. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor – Bot only respects its own templates. Favonian (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent vandalism/disruptive edititng by IP accounts EditingMatthew (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 07:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unconstructive edits from the last few hours where some editor(s) keep changing around the name of the person. — AP 499D25 (talk) 08:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in last few days [[86]], [[87]], [[88]], [[89]], [[90]] etc. Theonewithreason (talk) 08:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 14:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of unconstructive edits and BLP violations by various IP editors in the last few hours. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 14:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockfarm's at it, with the sole purpose of adding unrelated Azerbaijani Latin script (which is officially used only in the post-Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan) to this Iranian city. All listed accounts are created to reinstate the edits made by the master account. Already created a SPI.[91] -. LouisAragon (talk) 15:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: On three occasions in the past week (once on 16 May 2024 and twice on 21 May 2024) there has been vandalism to this article. Each time, the vandalism consisted of deleting over 40,000 characters and adding the line "DON'T RECOMMENDED THIS SERVICE BECAUSE OF BLOCKED PROXY ON WIKIPEDIA!!!" which also appears in the edit comments. AmigaClone (talk) 08:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malinaccier (talk) 13:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 18:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced and badly formatted content by IP editor. See also Special:History/Small Kana Extension and Special:History/Kana Extended-A for more examples of this IP's activity. Nickps (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, the page has been moved to draft and the sockpuppet creator has been blocked. There are other technical restrictions in place which should prevent them from continuing this with a new account. You can tag the draft for deletion, but it looks like you think it has merit. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 13:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: User:2603:3003:320E:6100:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Not enough disruptive editing othewise, so further protection is Declined. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, as above. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. WP:ARBPIA 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 12:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive changes to release date (and title) without reliable sourcing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. @Trailblazer101: I've warned the editor about edit warring. Please report them to WP:ANEW if they continue. In the meantime, I would recommend explaining why their edits are incorrect on their user talk page. I would also recommend being cautious about WP:3RR. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism. User:Namiba 17:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 18:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: no comment on the request itself, but EndzoneEnthusiast, your last three edits lack an edit summary, so one cannot tell anything about these when looking at the revision history. So it'd be good if you did use edit summaries consistently. Thank you. El_C 18:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Including unsourced claims of new coaching job. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Asking for a longer length of page protection. Article is prone to unreferenced edits and vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism Daask (talk) 13:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is being changed by a government supporter without any reliable source, please pay attention. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC). Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Please refer to my note here, Youknowwhoistheman (i.e. still just the one user). Thank you. El_C 18:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An user by the IP of 122.54.107.69 has continuously been adding fictional aircraft which disrupts the accuracy of the article and even after I made a warning the user has still been adding fictional aircraft to a list for real planes. Thehistorianisaac (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. @Thehistorianisaac: I've warned them for you, but please make greater efforts to issue talk page warnings to users that are vandalizing articles. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by Beauty Pageant and Telenovela IP vandal sock 124.107.211.40 (talk) 08:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As per previous request, several more socks of Jaszen have turned up. [92] [93] [94] [95]. All reported at SPI but requesting temporary semi-protection in the meantime. Barry Wom (talk) 11:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. [96] [97] [98] [99]

IP user is citing a news page about the Crimean Tatar invasion of New England (one English city established in Crimea) as a source for the English origin of Crimean Tatars. Website holds no credibility [100], and it does not mention anything about English origin of Crimean Tatars rather, it is only about invasion and history of the city. I attempted to engage with the user on the talk page. [101].

Once again, the IP user has provided two sources that make no mention of the English origin of Crimean Tatars. This time, the words "English" or "Anglo-Saxon" don't even appear. I am fully convinced this is not a good faith edit and he is trying to mislead the readers for personal reasons. I believe this user won't stop using fake citations to prove his agenda. Auzandil (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Sorry, but as I note in a request/s above a few minutes ago, we don't usually protect on account of just one user; usually there needs to be several to qualify for protection. Thank you. El_C 18:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22 May 2024

Reason: Repeated attacks by right-wing users attempting to discredit an economist within the Biden Administration by changing his title from "economist" to "musician" because he has historically played instruments DenbyDoo (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked 2601:5C4:4300:3260:0:0:0:0/64 for a spell. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: We have a famous serial killer in the hospital who may be dying soon...... Let's lock this up until we have proper sourcing. Moxy🍁 22:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Moxy: I don’t see any unsourced edits from EC users, so could you please clarify why you’re requesting ECP? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have people adding that he's dead... I can't find sources for that yet..... but it is anticipated ....News from this afternoon Moxy🍁 22:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Moxy: That's an IP address editor, not an extended confirmed user. We generally don't protect pages with ECP unless there is significant disruption from autoconfirmed users. This is discussed more at WP:PREEMPTIVE and WP:ECP. (Technically speaking, BLPs can be extended confirmed protected under WP:CT/BLP, but this page isn't anywhere near the point where that makes sense.) If there's significant disruption from autoconfirmed users, please feel free to submit a request for ECP. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry wasn't paying attention to the acronym used...... will do so thanks for your help. Moxy🍁 22:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 22:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The IP hopper who frequented these kind of pages is back. They're adding unnecessary references and reverting my constructive editing, and only they seem to be fiercely objecting to what I do. Vidpro23 (talk) 12:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:ImTheCool, using IPs from Rockford, Illinois. Binksternet (talk) 20:32, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 138.199.105.90 (talk · contribs). One year, this time. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous section blanking without consensus being formed or discussed in talk. PinkBunnyBun (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive anonymous editing seeking to add inappropriate content and to remove longstanding settled content. DanielRigal (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "inappropriate content", I'm literally trying to balance up the biased lede of this article. You keep removing it rather than collaboratively editing it, so really this is your fault. Also you can't logically complain that it's unreferenced when the rest of the paragraph isn't either. I already pointed out that the references later in the article support what I wrote and I even quoted the part that I was referring to. Do better, please. 2A00:23EE:2418:718:B81C:E698:CC3A:8BF7 (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No you are not. That is not balance. Clearly this is not your first rodeo on Wikipedia if you can find your way here. Have you been blocked from editing under any other account or IP? DanielRigal (talk) 00:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No actually I found this through the "contribs" link next to your username in the history page. 2A00:23EE:2418:718:B81C:E698:CC3A:8BF7 (talk) 00:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 00:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 02:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade from full-protection to template-protection to match the protection settings of its target page.102.156.71.151 (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target page is not protected since 2022 by HJ Mitchell.102.156.71.151 (talk) 00:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is constantly being vandalized by various IP vandals (including removing sourced passages and deleting page images) 常保敬 (talk) 03:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. On its face, low disruptive activity (and fairly low activity overall), but I don't like how it took multiple days to undo one of these, so erring on the side of severity. El_C 04:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal returned within hours of the protection being lifted. Resumed disruptive edits and personal attacks. RickyCourtney (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A redirect which was protected over a decade ago. Is the protection still necessary for the time being?102.156.71.151 (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: The redirect isn't protected. The target, however, is protected. The last time it was unprotected, it received no edits that weren't vandalism or reversion of vandalism before protection was reinstated. The time before that, it was hit 5 times in two days. Why give them the chance? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 21:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting a protection removal from the redirect only. I am not requesting an unprotection from the target page. I know what I am requesting. To be clear, I have visited the editing source of this redirect (not target) and noticed that it is limited for autoconfirmed users. Strangely enough, there isn't a clue in the protection log, except that its protection settings got moved from the target article.102.156.71.151 (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is odd. I'm not seeing any current protection in the log, but the message is there. Then again, what reason is there to edit this anyway? To turn it into a disambiguation page? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:17, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then perhaps considering the redirect a deletion if its existence in WP is worthless?102.156.71.151 (talk)
I'm not saying it's worthless. I'm saying I can't think of a reason to edit it. It's fine the way it is. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I am just realizing, if the same title with a hyphen instead of a space isn't protected, why this one is? The title with the hyphen received no edits ever since it got converted into a redirect by buidhe back in 2018.102.156.71.151 (talk) 23:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's protected because when a page is moved the redirect from the move has the same protection as its target. I see no point in unprotecting, though, so Declined * Pppery * it has begun... 03:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Newspaper owner currently in trouble with the government because his newspaper is publishing reports critical of the Home Minister. Persistent disruptive editing, and introduction of BLP violations. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More evidence of such may be in the deleted version. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As for asking to go from none to WP:ECP, I prefer going from none to WP:SEMI here — but if it proves insufficient, feel free to relist, Usedtobecool. El_C 06:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Potentially controversial issues regarding transgender identity of a character; remake releases in ~48 hours. ArkHyena (talk) 07:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bit of a primer for those who may not be aware. A character in this game (Vivian) was transgender in the Japanese text of the original 2004 version. Its remake releases this week. This was edited out of most localizations (including English) but is not being edited out this time around (the game in other ways has fewer localization changes too). One edit added unsourced information, while another removed material from reliable sources. Probably WP:CT/GG given the online discourse elsewhere. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/GG. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short article about a transgender TikToker where nearly all IP and new account edits are pronoun change vandalism. Belbury (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. El_C 09:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism, still has vandals, and no reason why vandalism won't persist indefinitely. Idiosincrático (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARPBIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 12:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been under a malicious attack with false and controversial (politically inclined) information being added by multiple editors, which seems to be connected with the current massive spam attack on the Dubai’s real estate industry. To avoid further vandalism, full protection is requested for the page Tara.ghorayeb (talk) 12:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tara.ghorayeb:, as I wrote on your talk page, the article's talk page is there for discussing issues, please use it. --DoebLoggs (talk) 12:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have requested for protection because if you have a look at the edit history, controversial and politically motivated information has been added to the page which isn't legally proven. Wikipedia isn't a place for the controversial informations and there is a clear pattern for users adding the same information in four different paragraphs - clear proof of vandalism. Therefore, it is important that the information is removed and page is placed under full protection for now. Tara.ghorayeb (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the request was already submitted, Tara.ghorayeb, so you duplicated it for naught, which resulted in an inadvertent duplication of the protection itself. Why not add your note at the original request? El_C 12:51, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already Done. El_C 12:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The controversial edits have not been removed and the page has been placed under semi-protection. I request that you look into the complete matter. Wikipedia can't be a space for allegations against companies or individuals, else everyone will start adding controversial and unproven information. It is a platform to purely give out the correct information and we are all here just to ensure that. Tara.ghorayeb (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I can't spare the time for a deeper dive atm. El_C 12:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I was here third! El_C 12:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please look into the matter, because the edits made on the page by users are controversial and the same information has been added in four different paragraphs making it seem as if it's the only important things about the organization - clear proof of vandalism. Repeating the same information over and over again in an article also goes against the Wikipedia rules. It is also against the rules to add controversial and misleading information as Wikipedia is not a place for it. Tara.ghorayeb (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Again, sorry, Tara.ghorayeb, but as mentioned, I can't spare the time for a deeper dive atm. But if those additions are WP:UNDUE, then it wouldn't really be a matter of vandalism or disruption, but rather, a content dispute. In which case, you're welcome to try to persuade other editors in favour of your position on the article talk page (Talk:DAMAC Properties). If still at an impasse after that, then you could make use of a number of dispute resolution requests, such as a Third opinion request. HTH. El_C 13:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unregistered users from IP addresses in Grand Forks (Cory's constituency) have repeatedly removed portions of the article discussing her May 2024 DUI arrest. Marchiviste (talk) 13:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 13:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs removing large swaths of content with no explanation. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term disruption on a WP:TROUBLES article, current IP making the same disruptive changes as Special:Contributions/2A02:C7E:2C0C:C200:0:0:0:0/64 did for several years. Kathleen's bike (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Indeed, as WP:TROUBLES. El_C 14:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stifle (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles have been indefinitely protected by a deceased user over a decade ago. Hopefully those WP:DEers are gone for good, well at least from some of the above pages.102.156.71.151 (talk) 21:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected, as the only way to know if protection is still needed is to see if disruption returns without the protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CT/A-I so recommend WP:ECR per parent article protection. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. That's not a thing we do by default (parent article). Also, the one user whom you are in dispute with on that page is already extended confirmed, so protection at that level would have no effect (on either one of you). El_C 12:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I thought for CT/A-I it could be preventative. I'm otherwise not in dispute with any user on that page. Per talk page, I'm very much in agreement, as long as correct procedures are followed that is. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editors adding uncited and speculative information. 24 hours should be enough. Stifle (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Amakuru. Stifle (talk) 15:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... The article is indeed protected and currently located at 2024 United Kingdom general election. The round-robin move confused the bot. Favonian (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations. Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism with no edit summary. Wikibear47 (talk) 15:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, protected temporarily multiple times in the past. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 15:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target page is not protected and has not suffered vandalism for the past 9 months.102.156.71.151 (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UnprotectedFavonian (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper blatantly fails to WP:AGF, spews personal attacks, and does not care for discussing problems despite a open talk page section. Same reason why the page was protected last time. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple recent edits by IP users attempting to change the subject's name on the info box. Some with even deliberately incorrect edit summaries to avoid scrutiny. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 18:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move-protected long enough. I suggest downgrading move requirement from administrator access to autoconfirmed access.102.156.71.151 (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined There is absolutely zero value to doing this since redirects shouldn't normally be moved anyway per WP:MOVEREDIRECT. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood.102.156.71.151 (talk) 17:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from auto-confirmed accounts. If you look at the revision history, you will see that there has been a lot of disruption related to hyperlinking terms. Temporary Extended-Confirmed protection to deal with this issue, every time I visit the article, I keep seeing hyperlinks added and removed. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 17:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Wikipedia doesn't mandate that articles remain static. There's a little recent back-and-forth regarding how to link and pipe concepts, but nothing disruptive. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Likely LOUTSOCKing and UPE. IP removing redirect of a recent closed out deletion discussion to merge this into another page. Will likely happen many times until protected. CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protected long enough. Consider a year of pending-protection and see how far this goes?102.156.71.151 (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like something that would immediately be vandalised with BLP-violating dross. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Unprotecting this would be a waste of time. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Turn Germany to a higher protection level to extended because people are keep on vandalizing it. 208.98.222.46 (talk) 16:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, in my opinion not frequent enough to merit semi-protection, but indefinite pending changes should do the job. Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is a mess. I need help!. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2024

Reason: Please protect this page, as this is an ongoing a recent event. doclys (❀) 16:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there is a high level of IP vandalism. doclys (❀) 16:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most IP edits are constructive, protection would create collateral damage. I would decline. Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the last 100 edits (all today) there have been enough disruptive edits to justify a short period of protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism has continued since protection expired, likely targeted by schools. Extending this protection to indefinite would save both anti-vandal's and pending changes reviewers time and energy. TylerBurden (talk) 19:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from Brazil-based IP-hopping user. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent removal of sourced content. Recently I reported at WP:ANI that an editor keeps removing information on this article even when it's sourced claiming it to be misinformation. That editor has been blocked from editing the page, but he or she didn't waste anytime making another account and again removing sourced content claiming it to be a privacy request from the actress.[102] Which I highly doubt. I'm not sure if I should ask this here or at WP:ANI, but is it possible for someone to protect that page from not only IP editors, but also user accounts that have made maybe around less than 20 edits? Kcj5062 (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – It appears that off-wiki WP:CANVASSING is happening and the talk page is being flooded with forum chatter and WP:NPA violations. Request semi for talk page in the hope it stops again. Raladic (talk) 23:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Content dispute/edit warring. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting extended-protected for Mizkif article page for frequent violation for WP:BLPPRIVACY of his real name. Also requested to erased his real name from the history logs. see Talk:Mizkif/Archive_1#Real_Name for previous discussion of his real name. Http iosue (talk) 23:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Redacted some of the edits in question. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rapid sockpuppeting attempts to close the discussion. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not even a single constructive edit since the start of 2024. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: falls under WP:CT/A-I even says that in the talk page Daisytheduck (talk) 03:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jdhfox, recreated by sock IP right after previous EC protection expired. Padgriffin Griffin's Nest 03:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same IP keeps making unilateral edits without engaging on the talk page. I have asked them to make an account as well as discuss. They never do. Giving this template edit protection would make the IP actually have to engage with the community. Mason (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target page is not protected.102.156.71.151 (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected * Pppery * it has begun... 02:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: extended confirmed protection: falls under WP:CT/A-I Daisytheduck (talk) 23:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Any connection to the Arab Israeli conflict is pretty tenuous. Just because something exists in that part of the world doesn't qualify it for protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i understand Daisytheduck (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 174.206.164.32 (talk · contribs) blocked by DanCherek. Favonian (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Untamed1910 (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 174.206.164.32 (talk · contribs) blocked by DanCherek. Favonian (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP-hopping LOUTSOCK of article creator persistently adding unsourced claims and copyrighted images. Wikishovel (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated redirect overwrites against the wishes of the community; this edit summary better describes these edits. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 07:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rang HD. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 07:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 08:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent BLP violations and vandalism over the past few days GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandals have returned (Sunil Narine over Nitish Rana for 2023); Indefinite protection needed. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 08:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Because his video is currently trending in India, people are vandalizing the article. GrabUp - Talk 08:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 10:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be something like a move war over the past month? IP editor has likely now created an account to continue the disruptive editing. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The new account has been warned; disruption not heavy enough to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Upcoming tournament. Nearly but not perfect (talk) 06:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I am sure that this will need protection at some point, but the time hasn't come yet. Lectonar (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The film got released today, and IP users are vandalizing the article. GrabUp - Talk 11:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 05:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5 years of PC: I realized that the page is pending-protected according to the protection log. What I don't understand is how its protection settings got moved to swimming (disambiguation) (whose protection may not be necessarily these days due to low IP edit-count) without retaining its protection settings. You admins ought to add a feature to copy protection settings for pages which have to be moved. It is obnoxiously perplexing.197.0.217.64 (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably something you can't see, so I'll copy it here: "09:55, 9 November 2017:User:Jenks24 moved pending changes settings from Swimming to Swimming (disambiguation) (Swimming moved to Swimming (disambiguation): per requested move discussion, see Talk:Swimming). my guess would be the explanation might be somewhere in the talk-archives, then, but no guarantee. Lectonar (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of that. That message comes from swimming (disambiguation)'s page log, which I mistakenly called it protection log. My concern is, despite gaining its protection settings from its original title name, how can swimming itself not be protected?197.0.217.64 (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Found discussion. According to talk:swimming#Requested move 24 October 2017, the page was initially called human swimming, which is now a redirect. If that redirect gets protected, its protection settings would duplicate to swimming. I get it now. But first, swimming (disambiguation) has to be unprotected first.197.0.217.64 (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely protected pages in Template:Buzz! video games

The last rejected pending revision was two years ago for each page. They have been protected by a user who is no longer an admin.197.0.217.64 (talk) 12:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected All 3. Lectonar (talk) 13:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank U.197.0.217.64 (talk) 13:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two years of semi-protection relating to WP:BLP vandalism. The article possesses a lengthy protection history.197.0.217.64 (talk) 14:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Requests from LTAs will not be entertained. Favonian (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not much vandalism being committed by anonymous users nowadays, which ironically isn't the case with the previous two. All three have been indefinitely pending-protected 8 years ago by a now-inactive user.197.0.217.64 (talk) 12:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Requests from LTAs will not be entertained. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No edits by anonymous users have been recorded for the past 18 months.197.0.217.64 (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Requests from LTAs will not be entertained. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not much IP vandalism these days. Indefinitely protected by a user who is inactive now.197.0.217.64 (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Requests from LTAs will not be entertained. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stale edit history since 2022.197.0.217.64 (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Requests from LTAs will not be entertained. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: This was just protected for three days, and within three minutes of the protection expiring (from 04:28, 23 May 2024 UTC to 04:31, 23 May 2024 UTC), the vandalism resumed. The same type as well (compare [103] and [104]). Multiple IPs are again involved. Egsan Bacon (talk) 05:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. ObserveOwl (chit-chatmy doings) 13:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: nearly every edit on this disambiguation page in the past 2 years is related to vandalism by users with only a few edits or IPs GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because any vandalism has likely died down. The article needs a bit of clean up in regards to paragraphs placement and sources needed.2.100.74.138 (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Erh, no, that's not gonna work, but I have added {{Edit semi-protected}} to your existing talk page request in order to attract some attention. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the film’s notablitly has been quieted down. The plot currently reads "(Schofield) awakens at night and makes his way through the flare-lit ruins of the town. After evading a German soldier, he discovers a French woman hiding with a presumably orphaned infant." When he is making his way, he is fired upon by several unseen Germans, before he encounters and is chased by the one that charges him, the French woman says she doesn't know who the baby's mother is, so "presumably" could be irrelevant to use. so it could be rephrased to "He is fired upon by Germans and after invading one, find a French woman hiding with an orphan child". In addition, it could be added for this section, in which Cumberbatch's character says that Schofield's efforts might have been in vain in the end: "He forces his way in to meet Mackenzie, who reads the message and reluctantly calls off the attack, though Mackenzie also says that, while the cancellation offers a temporary reprieve, command will likely change its orders in a week. 2.100.74.138 (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Here too, I have added {{Edit semi-protected}} to your existing talk page request in order to attract some attention. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from IP users and a newly created account. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 14:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israel-Hamas war. MagyarNavy1918 (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/A-I IanDBeacon (talk) 15:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Consistently targeted by Rang HD socks. Needs a long protection. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 14:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP really isn't necessary; semi can make socking like this a lot harder. But, yes, a longer protection is desirable. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a variety of IPs and new accounts. Lengthy protection suggested: diff from April 5 to present shows 83 edits and reverts, resulting in one positive change [105] signed, Willondon (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP editors since March. Morgan695 (talk) 15:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism with random memes with "SUS" or "Baka," etc. AriTheHorseTalk to me! 18:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There is an ongoing edit war on this page. Both editors are well aware and have discussed on the article talk page but I still see recent edits by both of them. Might be a good idea to give full protection for a few days just until everything cools down. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that this page comes under Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Goldenarrow9 (talk) 20:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 20:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. One person keeps creating new accounts to make unsourced edits to the band members section. They make the same edits with the same edit summaries. They have been doing this for years starting out on the Killers. Blocking them does nothing because they just create a new account. Bowling is life (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent spam/promotion. Most edits from non-confirmed users appear to be spam. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP vandalism by new accounts and IPS Borgenland (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP hopper altering sourced info. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sanandaj and Ghorveh; CTOPS notices left on those talk pages.
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ilam, Iran, and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated unfounded changes, especially by IP-users. Vandilism, see "view history". Please block for IP-edits.FootyBystander (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello. Considering that there already has been some IP disruption and since I expect the disruption to continue in light of UN's recognition of 11 July as International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica, I think it's time to protect the article. StephenMacky1 (talk) 21:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 21:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

24 May 2024

Arbitration Enforcement: Raise to Extended-Confirmed Protection because this article is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. How is it that Israel-Saudi Arabia relations is Extended-Confirmed protected, but the article on Saudi Arabia is not? Especially considering the Normalization that was supposed to take place, between These two countries before October 7th. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And your request answers your own question. Normalization is/was much more germane to the relations article than the article about the country as a whole. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indef protection from non-ECU: Due to the list containing sources heavily involved in the Israel-Palestinian conflicts which is a magnet of vandalism by non-ECU. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 05:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I see in the recent history some reverts recently. None of them are related to the current conflict; they appear to arise from legitimate discussions about particular sources' assessments or inclusions on the page (a page that gets viewed quite a bit for one not in article space).

I would only protect this page in a situation like the one two years which led to the only protection in the page history: where connected third-party actors are engaging in a concerted effort to alter our judgement on a source without any discussion here. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It's a few days old and the issue raised seems to me to be a legitimate point. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 15:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 180.74.0.0/16 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Doctor Strange19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. regarding recent edits and recognition of Palestinian state Dell Latitude E6400 (talk) 17:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hell, even Israel-Norway relations isn't really seeing disruption given this. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. same reason as above Dell Latitude E6400 (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Again, very little disruption, as with Ireland-Israel relations. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – indefinitely by User:Daniel Case. See also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle/Archive. EdJohnston (talk) 02:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Increased disruptive edits in the past week. –WPA (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 01:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. High level of IP and sockpuppet vandalism and edits that violate WP:BLP. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 01:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 02:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant edit warring, particularly by user Malik-Al-Hind, but by IP users as well. The former user fails to stop reinstating edits which, on the talk page, (see Discussion 1 and Discussion 2) there have been discussions against adding such edits. I plan to start an RfC soon, and until that is over there should be full protection until any disputes have been settled, as was recently done on the Gupta Empire article when there was edit warring there. The current consensus reversion, as I recently restored to, is 1225352800. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article is already indefinitely semi-protected, as you might expect from one so close to the center of what makes a contentious topic area contentious, I ask you for clarification on what protection options you would like. Going to extended-confirmed protection wouldn't keep MaH from editing, as they already have that user right. If edit warring is the problem, perhaps we should go to ECP and 1RR ... I don't think anybody would question that on this article. What do you think? Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I said in my above comment there should be full protection, which I think is appropriate temporarily until all disputes (the inclusion of "Hindustan" in the lead and the inclusion of "Indo-Muslim" in the lead) can be settled. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 22:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I see you asked for full protection, but the way you want it would require doing it indefinitely, and we just don't full-protect articles indefinitely. And frankly, looking at the article history the problems go back longer than the current dispute. I'm thinking more and more that ECP/1RR, under CTOPS authority, is the best option. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That seems fine, I'll open two RfCs on the mentioned issues once that is added. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, could you expand on why temporary full protection is not possible here? There has been constant edit warring or disputes over what to include in the lead, and while I'm not saying fully protecting the page will fix it permanently, it will give time to discuss and settle the issues, and especially with an RfC, there can be consensus over whether or not to revert such edits in the case of future edit warring over similar matters. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Just my 2 cents: Yes, we have some kind of rather slow edit warring, but disruption of the article seems not too pronounced at the moment. Article talk is used to good effect, and discussion is ongoing. Full protection would be overkill. Lectonar (talk) 06:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, right now the only problematic user is the mentioned Malik-Al-Hind, who really doesn't get the point that he can't always be right. I started an RfC on one of the issues that was edit warred against, which should eventually resolve that dispute. What do you think about temporarily blocking MaH for edit warring, which would presumably resolve most of the issues? Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 06:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to go that way we would have: Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. With just one disrupting user, (full) protection would be like shooting sparrows with cannon. Lectonar (talk) 06:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know full protection is not appropriate when it is only one user causing problematic edits — however, this did not appear to be the case when I initially requested protection as there were recent problematic edits by multiple users, but this has only persisted by the sole user. I don't have time now to start a report on AN3 but do we really have to go through all the formalities just to recognize constant edit warring by a user? Just look at the revision history of the article. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but this request has been closed.  Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 07:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptions have begun again. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: If the png file is protected, shouldn't the SVG version be protected as well? အဒေါ့ဖ် ဟစ်တလာ (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done — the png is not protected, though, အဒေါ့ဖ် ဟစ်တလာ. El_C 06:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This one IP keeps changing the Arabic text of this Egyptian journalist's name to call him various barnyard animals Maltice (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six-month semi-protection: Recently had two brief periods of protection; IP vandalism has resumed shortly thereafter. Cambial foliar❧ 07:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, six months is excessive at this point. El_C 07:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit-warring / repeated undiscussed removal by IP. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Date-changing vandal from Guatemala. Erick (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I suppose this indie video game must have a dedicated following of some kind, because it was released in 2020 and still attracts a lot of vandalism and/or unconstructive edits by IP users and newly created accounts. Just today, another indef block. If indef is too much, might I suggest a longer block? Thanks!. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has only been protected once; the usal procedere is to slowly escalate the duration of protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mellk (talk) 11:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected CTOPS. Lectonar (talk) 12:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term protection requested after personal attack by Special:Contributions/2601:581:4500:A680:C1D6:95DD:6FE8:5DED who is User:Belsinfps editing logged-out. Binksternet (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Annh07 (talk) 15:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is attracting BLP vandals due to a recent trade. Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Massive page view increase on Wikipedia with over 100,000 page views on May 23 alone. Page topic has appeared in major news outlets as part of highly charged political debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and Donald Trump. Example 1, Example 2, Example 3.

Persistent POV pushing and vandalism from IP addresses and newly created accounts. Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, Example 4, Example 5, Example 6, Example 7, Example 8. BootsED (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lost its previous indefinite semi protection after a temporary sysop protection. Aidan9382 (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sudden and stubborn influx of IPs and new accounts created with the sole purpose of vandalizing the page, removing information cited en masse, as visible from the chrono of the last two weeks circa. Subjected to repeated vandalism in these same minutes. Sira Aspera (talk) 09:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page keeps being vandalised by sockpuppets (even though the page is already semi-protected..). Several socks of the sockmaster (The Penfield Homunculus) have been banned during the last couple of months but the vandalism continues due to new socks emerging. Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 12:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalic edits are your's. Stop accusing others to sockpuppetry. First, demonstrate. Second, accuse. Mucchia (talk) 13:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Ironically) this message above was posted by one of their socks... Eem dik doun in toene (talk) 13:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed that Mucchia is one of the aforementioned socks. If it was feasible, I'd protect all the articles targeted by this prolific sockpuppeteer, but there's just too many. I'm leaving for a couple of days, otherwise I'd tackle this myself. I second Eem dik doun in toene's request for a more narrow protection. --Yamla (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone has obviously changed the first section either as a joke or maliciously. It is claiming that a British actress is descended from "predator" aliens. The rest of the article appears to be the original text. 81.78.117.74 (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Multiple instances of obvious vandalism by bigots. UnkreativeFrog (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of hoax content by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User:Therealbey is edit-warring to move Chittagong to Chattogram while the matter is under discussion at Talk:Chittagong#Article Title, against prior consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh/Archive 7#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy, and against Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was changing the name to its official name is it my wrong?? The official name according to the People's Republic of Bangladesh is Chattogram not Chittagong. The word Chittagong was used at the time of British East India Company but after Bangladesh established it has restored it again to Chattogram Therealbey (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Therealbey:, since this is contested, you need to use WP:RM to propose a move and get consensus. The protection is for one month and that should give you enough time to see if that is possible. RegentsPark (comment) 21:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism conducted by several anonymous IPs whom assumed to be probably controlled by the same person (User:Eva2024), who has been making virturally identical edits since 14 May. He claimed the certain contents of personal autobiography to be untrue without providing reliable sources to prove the rewrite, by persisting removal of referenced contents and refused to bring the dispute to the talk page before making change, only leaving repeated summary statement. Request for extending page protection or increasing the level of protection. Pataya2527 (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Over the past year since the last request, there have been several specific vandalism incidents that have had to be reverted over the nationality of the subject. Mehrashehra (talk) 15:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 15:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Request for those IPs to be blocked. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Doug Weller talk 17:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RegentsPark (comment) 21:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I do not believe the protection of this page is needed because there isn't anyone hawk eyeing the article like before and there hasn't been any attempts to make changes on the talk page RowanJ LP (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user who protected the page is busterD. They should be responsible to handle this request.197.3.119.95 (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it say that you extended confirmed the page? I thought you kept it at the semi-protected level? RowanJ LP (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I used the wrong template earlier. Also, petitioner has been blocked; very likely an LTA. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – None of the IP edits in the past week have been constructive. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 16:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This should allow time to clear up the Phoenix situation. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite Semi-protection: Repeated attempts by COI editor indef-blocked twice already (1st, 2nd) to hijack the article to be about their own record company. Current attempt is by "Samrecods2021" (sic). Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring--Trade (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:RUSUKR, non-EC editors are adding low quality sources such as Telegram to claim losses. TylerBurden (talk) 19:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log as well at sanctions page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

25 May 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Today, this BLP article is seeing several attempts to include serious allegations against the subject sourced, depending on the edit, to either: a)Twitter or b)nothing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will add CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ionmars10 (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeatedly the User:Mohammad Umar Ali edit this page. Rahio1234 11:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would request anyone who is seeing the msg that this user Rahio is harassing me and not letting me add my WP:RS sourced information in the article just because it doesn't suit his POV. I already had a long discussion on the disputed topic in Maratha Confederacy talk page and quoted the information from WP:RS sources still he is vandalizing the info and reverting my edits. Also this user has been previously blocked for adding unsourced information (WP:OR) and edit disputes. Plz help me and see to it. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:RS if necessary Rahio1234 11:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think is a reliable source? You seem to cite WP:RS every time you disagree with someone's edits, despite most of the time the edits being fine. I recently reverted your reverts on Ministry of Interior (Iraq) because an IP added good and cited content which you reverted by just saying, "see WP:RS". I don't think Mohammad Umar Ali is in the right either here, as he even has an ongoing and seemingly truthful sockpuppet investigation against him, but you can't always cite WP:RS anytime an IP edits a page or someone adds content you don't like. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1st source The Marathas New Cambridge history of India Vol2 Part 4 pg 138 mentions Maratha brief occupation of Punjab see the quote: After yet another Abdali invasion, the Marathas, under Nana Saheb’s brother, Ragunath Rao, and Malhar Rao Holkar, returned from Malwa and the Deccan in the campaigning season of 1757-58. A Maratha invasion of the Punjab followed, which coincided with the much more significant Sikh rebellion. The Maratha Punjab adventure was brief; the Ragunath Rao expedition left little administration behind, and the Sikhs successfully resisted any attempt to set up long-term Maratha authority. This clearly says Marathas briefly occupied Punjab and the exact limits can be inferred from my second source JL Mehta Advance study in History of India pg 234-237
My 2nd WP:RS source JL Mehta's Advance Study in Indian History pg 237 clearly says quoting; Thus nature did provide a golden opportunity to the Marathas to establish their sway over whole of Punjab and northwest India, upto Attock and Khyber pass, although the spell of their rule proved very shortlived. This clearly indicates Maratha Empire/Confederacy ruled till Khyber Pass.
<meta />
3rd WP:RS source Pletcher, Kenneth (2010). The History of India pg 198 quoting; Thus in 1757 Ahmad Shah's son Timur, appointed governor of Punjab, was forced to retreat from Lahore to Peshawar under the force of attacks from Sikhs and Marathas.
4th WP:RS Source;The state at war in South Asia page 55; quoting: The Marathas attacked soon after and, with some help from the Sikhs, managed to capture Attock, Peshawar, and Multan between April and May 1758. SEE the word "CAPTURED"
Additional: The Marathas New Cambridge History of India Vol2 Part 4 states This is for Areal limit of the Empire/Confederacy (same source); Quoting: First, we shall look at the expanding areas controlled by the Marathas, and there were many. Maratha leaders pushed into Rajasthan, the area around Delhi, and on into the Punjab. They attacked Bundelkund and the borders of Uttar Pradesh. Further east, the Marathas attacked Orissa and the borders of Bengal and Bihar.
And Same book pg 138 states; quoting; This is the source for protectors of Delhi throne pg 138 here is the quotation: For the Marathas, probably the two most significant events of the whole chaotic period in Delhi were a treaty in 1752, which made them protector of the Mughal throne (and gave them the right to collect chauth in the Punjab), and the civil war of 1753, by which the Maratha nominee ended up on the Mughal throne. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Multiple users are persistently disruptive the article, likely due to the new move talk consensus. PadFoot2008 12:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got the WP:RS Sources Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 12:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Maybe you need to do something to bring in more editors. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 216.93.130.160 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 60 hours, following AIV report. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least a few reverts each day. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Little to no useful edits by non-confirmed users. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS since the six-months under which BDP runs hasn't expired yet. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mpox Vandal. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiparty edit war. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mpox Vandal. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Mr. Spurlock had just passed away and as a result there will be an increase in activity to this page. There has already been vandalistic edits made regarding the cause of his death, related to what he is known for (i.e. his movie Super Size Me and edits saying he died from obesity). --ZLMedia 17:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: I am requesting protection for the "Call of Duty: Black Ops 6" Wikipedia page due to ongoing issues that are severely affecting its quality and reliability. These issues include:

-Edit Wars: The page has been the subject of frequent and disruptive edit wars. Users are continuously reverting each other's changes, which has resulted in instability and an inconsistent presentation of information.

-Spread of Misinformation: Many edits include inaccurate information, rumors, and unverified claims about the game. This misinformation misleads readers and undermines the credibility of the page.

-Vandalism: There have been multiple instances of vandalism where users deliberately add false or nonsensical information. This further degrades the quality of the page and the experience for those seeking legitimate information.

Protecting this page will help ensure that it remains a reliable source of information and prevent further disruption caused by these issues. Thank you for considering this request.

Ryan York (talk) 21:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not really seeing the kind of disruption that merits protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by IPs Isi96 (talk) 22:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor within similar IPv4 range. Ranges, diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4, etc. Look though revision history. --WikiLinuz (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. @WikiLinuz: If the disruption resumes, feel free to resubmit, but please try to make greater efforts to explain why an edit is being reverted, both in edit summaries and on user talk pages. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism (e.g. users Iamnotblocked123 and InedibleHulk) Charles Dong (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Kabosu is the dog behind the doge meme. So the vandalism from malicious users is extremely probable due to the popularity of doge meme. Charles Dong (talk) 23:47, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeat adding of poorly sourced/unsourced popular culture section to the article, two editors repeatedly refuse to follow MOS:POPCULT and provide reliable sources. TheDeviantPro (talk) 04:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully, this brief enhanced protection will get that point across, TheDeviantPro. El_C 04:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soibangla (talk) 07:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. AEL diff. El_C 07:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Oops, ECP, that is (AEL diff). El_C 07:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Juvenile IP vandalism. Appears to be habitual. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:33, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:

Reason: Persistant vandalism by IP address users. Keep constantly changing the death date from 17 May 2024 > 22 May 2024, may potentially be an edit war. PEPSI697 (talk) 07:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of non-historical edits by user NorthTension, that is disrupting the historically accurate colors of the flag. I request Protection of this page, a level high enough for him to not be able to edit it again. Wheatley2 (talk) 05:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done — that file is hosted at WP:COMMONS, so I suggest contacting admins there. El_C 05:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection:

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Golem469 (talk) 08:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – An IP hopper is adding content to the lead that is unduly long to an extent that it violates BLP. Air on White (talk) 09:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. MMMM97 (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: That's a recently created redirect. Which article did you want protection at? Daniel Case (talk) 22:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MMMM97: courtesy ping. El_C 07:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This appears to concern AFC Champions League -2 where there is a move discussion on article talk. There is a lot of editing but I did not notice vandalism and none was specified in this request. I ECP move-protected the article for a week. @MMMM97: In addition to the warnings on your talk, I will block you if you move that article again. Leave it for the discussion to be resolved and let someone else do it. Johnuniq (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 12:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Indefinite semi-protection. This page has been protected 20 times. 110.173.237.250 (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. An article like this will get a lot of attention but there have not been many recent bad edits. Johnuniq (talk) 08:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and nonconstructive edits

Special:Contributions/War_to_DudeFailDrop_26Sornsongkram

Special:Contributions/War_to_Sornsongkram26

Special:Contributions/ANTI-Disgustting_Old&Ugly_Protituteee. NoCringe (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. All the socks listed above, at least.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure we need WP:ECP just yet, though. But if WP:SEMI proves insufficient, feel free to relist here or drop me a line on my talk page, NoCringe. Also, I've WP:REVDEL'd some YesCringe. El_C 11:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting editing by the same Belarus IPs since February Special:Contributions/178.120.65.181, Special:Contributions/176.60.78.31, Special:Contributions/176.60.67.70. Some1 (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs + one newbie revert sourced information. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please refer to WP:NOTVANDALISM, tgeorgescu. Vandalism is a specific subset of disruptive editing, so it's best to be precise. El_C 11:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly all articles linked in Template:2022–2023 mpox outbreak should be protected.

Reason: Persistent Vandalism. The same vandal has been consistently adding the same racist word in nearly every article about Mpox. Additionally, they have now branched out into anime related articles. I would request those pages be protected as well. See edits of 2601:46:600:2AF5:4BA0:A68E:F9FC:3C71, 2601:46:600:8df4:e9e6:56bb:47d9:ce40, 2601:40:c600:a9f0:f8f6:d1a0:512b:2ea2, 76.98.200.125, 76.98.202.103, and more. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally not all articles have been successfully revdel'ed. Some still require it. If there is a range block that is obvious, that might be useful as well. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:09, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checking to see if protection is necessary. @Classicwiki: In the future, please list the specific articles with significant disruption. It's only a subset of the articles. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done — that template has not been edited for like 6 months! El_C 04:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Daniel Quinlan, missed your checking. El_C 04:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected. I've protected the articles with the most disruption. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 76.98.202.103 (talk · contribs). Other recent IPs also blocked by other administrators. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 13:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't work — manually archiving. El_C 14:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Ongoing edit war. 16 reversions since 08:35. Content dispute seems to have started 21 May. Adam Black tc 11:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both disputants p-blocked for violating WP:3RR (egregiously so). El_C 12:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks (to remove all temptation), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple attempts by multiple users to introduce non-NPOV comments to introduction. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 13:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please observe the ethos of WP:NOTVANDALISM#NPOV contraventions, Gaia Octavia Agrippa, which are presently failing to do. Thank you. El_C 14:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Excessive vandalism / disruptive editing. Paul_012 (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:38, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive edits from IP addresses. Zippo9310 (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:GS/PW. El_C 14:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-hopping vandal returned shortly after previous protection expired. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-hopping vandal returned shortly after previous protection expired. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persisant IP vandalism. Catfurball (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Something has happened On The Internet for fans (or enemies?) to keep adding "magician" to this rapper's article, without a source. It's tiresome. 46.69.215.187 (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted harassment by WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 18:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the duration of the IP's block, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Gottagotospace (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that someone give this article a serious look through. There are numerous grammatical errors, as if someone who is not a native English speaker wrote it. Errors are primarily subject/verb agreement. 133.130.185.232 (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't really an edit request. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
Not donefor the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP-vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AEL diff. El_C 20:20, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most of the non-users edited since the beginning of this year were reverted + a contentious topic. FuzzyMagma (talk) 15:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you just block them? 70.50.199.125 (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Third protection this year, un/relatedly. El_C 20:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent additions of unsourced content by IP editors, especially on the cast section and release dates. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit too active for pc to be effective at this time (though borderline). This is the third semiprotection this year is the point, however. El_C 20:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resumption basically same dynamic IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, POV-pushing, and MOS violations, mostly by IPs Gottagotospace (talk) 20:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done — you are in the wrong here actually, Gottagotospace. Please observe WP:BLPCRIME. El_C 20:42, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. IPs keep changing it to "murder" and I switch it back to "killing" so it follows our MOS. They also keep adding biased language about the suspect's immigration status. Can you please help me understand what I'm doing wrong? Gottagotospace (talk) 20:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The diff of the latest edit shows quite clearly the issue. Maybe you got mixed up? El_C 20:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that was a small mistake on my part. I did not add "murder" - that was added by an IP. There were two IP edits I should've reverted, but I accidentally only reverted one, so "murder" was leftover by an IP. I'll try to be more careful next time and revert both. Thank you. Gottagotospace (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, "small mistake" only because it got quickly corrected by that IP... But no worries, these things happen. And with that explained, on closer look:
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Clearfrienda 💬 21:25, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quote below is misleading in that Plan B can prevent a fertilized egg from implantation. This information is found on the box of Plan B. Ms Greene's use of the term "baby" is understood by most to mean a human being in germinal form. I would like the entire quote removed. Barring that then adding that Plan B can prevent implantation of a fertilized egg. Thanks. "In 2021, Greene falsely claimed that the Plan B contraceptive "kills a baby in the womb"; Plan B actually prevents ovulation and thus prevents pregnancy, instead of terminating a pregnancy.[168][169]" 99.11.248.241 (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given the passage can be sourced to the references cited (the "[168][169]" in the excerpt above), it's unlikely to be removed. I'd also strongly suggest finding a less-volatile topic area. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The phrase "understood by most" above is a made-up fact that would need backing up, and therefore this isn't a valid rationale to remove the quotation. There may be a fertilized egg that isn't yet implanted, but there is no "baby in the womb" because nothing is attached to the womb. This is in fact what Plan B is intended to prevent. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

26 May 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 17:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:KURDS and others. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. AE of what issues? That is not made clear and wasn't immediately apparent. Feel free to relist with reasoning that supports the need for (as opposed to just coverage by) a sanction regime, which would be WP:ARBIPA in this instance. El_C 20:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and POV-pushing by IPs. Skitash (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive IP editing.BabbaQ (talk) 22:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection after 20 previous protections. Vandalism has occurred on the 26, 25 and 20 May in the past week. 110.173.237.250 (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, closer to 30 (I believe 27), even. And a resurgence in the last few hours, so might as well. El_C 23:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, if petty, vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 23:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Disruptive editing by IP RegentsPark (comment) 00:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is misinformation in the page , it said the Libyan families were compensated when in truth they never were. They couldn’t afford to take it to court and Israel pretended they did offer to compensate but the Libyans rejected it. that is not true at all according to officers, Israel refused to even acknowledge their wrongdoing and refused to compensate the families. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.185.29.50 (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: How can there be "misinformation" on a page that doesn't exist? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 20:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Woefully inadequate request. Favonian (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We have a problem with a new editor not understanding the process of adding sources..... Let's make this unedible for them for a few days until we can figure this out. Best we teach them what to do than just block them out right. Moxy🍁 15:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Sorry, but it's difficult to justify protecting the page on account of a single user, not to mention at WP:ECP level, and not to mention going from no protection straight to to ECP (and finally for a page that has never been protected before). El_C 20:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
O well..... We will just go ahead and block another potential editor. Moxy🍁 20:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can work to adjust the protection policy accordingly (I have no strong view either way), but I can't violate it on a whim, Moxy. El_C 21:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was hoping to go to the soft route with a child editor. Moxy🍁 21:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even know how to respond to that. El_C 23:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have someone who seems enthusiastic about editing here...... but they're headed down the path to a block. Would be best if we can guide them rather than kick them to the curb. Moxy🍁 23:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You know, an editor can be "surgically" blocked from editing a single article. Warn appropriately and let me know if the problem persists. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your wording and approach on the users talk page.... This is something I always have a problem with
...
. That is the proper approach. Moxy🍁 00:56, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war for the place of origin NeD1a [[User:Nedia020415|Nedia020415]] (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit May 21. Before that May 8. Before that May 2. And before that, we're in April. It's just too low activity to qualify for protection. Check out some requests of pages that were protected to see the degree of activity that's usually expected. El_C 01:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is frequently disturbed by IP's. Calmkelp talk 08:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bishonen | tålk 08:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism and Usage of Multiple ip's by 2600:8807:C143:9F00:DDCF:80BA:C447:6B9D and 24.170.195.23. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Squeakachu (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 49TL. Favonian (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recurrent and high levels of IP vandalism by a user attempting to bias article towards a promotional tone. Based on multiple contextual clues, user may be the page's subject. Attempts to engage in good faith improvements of this article are being undermined by this repeated vandalism. Boredintheevening (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Air on White (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 188.29.33.129 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight.
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Prince of EreborThe Book of Mazarbul 13:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 13:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of the duration of the IP's block, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request one week semi protection due to excessive IP vandalism pbp 03:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Talk page of vanished user. BangJan1999 12:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. and the user has unvanished anyway. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: it is non-applicable Mooresklm2016 (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – The alternative would be for you to get blocked for disruptively removing the AfD notice. Favonian (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I see so many IP addresses changing "Not to be confused" part into something else since April 2024 Who is Amire80 (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repetitive vandalism by various IP addresses Thatsamaro (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:05, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent unsourced pov edits. HinduKshatrana (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., do not see any reason for full protection--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. ZimZalaBim talk 19:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Unsourced content. Edit warring. Disruptive editing. Wikibear47 (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/IPA. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring / content dispute. Please consider applying WP:ARBAP2 restrictions. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 19:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target; see page history for details. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One edit in the last two months. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection, reason: edit-warring by IPs, violates WP:3RR. orangkalideres - talk - contribs 03:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 3RR requires the edits to be in a 24 hour period. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To avoid vandalism. Any unauthorized user or newly created account user could remove the redirect to create the page. So, it is better to enhance its protection and only the extended confirmed users are allowed to make edits in it. Thanks.StayCalmOnTress (talk) 06:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hi, I made this page to serve as an informative guide to the people of Cebu City and Cebu Province in general. It took me a very long time to compile all of this and publish it here in Wikipedia (I am a Local Historian by the way). However, as I check this page from time to time, I found out that some users has disruptively edited the entries in this page by changing my original template and format as well as editing names of historical personalities into a Spanish-style format (First Name, Last Name and Maiden Name) rather than the current Filipino Name Format (First Name, Middle Name (Maiden Name) and Surname or Last Name). Also, some streets which are Spanish in nature were "hispanized" like one time, when Juan Luna Street was converted to "Calle Juan Luna". Also, some of the users were deleting middle (maiden) name without any reasons. I don't know if they are too historically attached to the article but they start editing the page like its they are the ones who created it. I just want my page to be protected. I'm tired of editing this page which was marred by their inputs (I am editing this page while requesting this, 5/26/24). I hope you can grant me that peace of mind with regards to this page. Thank You!. AdmiralProudmore (talk) 06:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Be aware that you do not WP:OWN the page. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. This page has been a constant target of vandalism from many different IPs for quite some time now. Permanent semi protection will help guard against vandalism and save everyone's time taken to do the same thing over and over. Wikibear47 (talk) 17:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. @Wikibear47: Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. If semi-protection is insufficient, consider requesting ECP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs and a newly registered user, all making the same joke. It had semi-protection for a couple days, but then when that expired, it started being vandalized again quite quickly. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

27 May 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page gets large amount of IP vandalism. This should stop that kind of lazy vandalism and save everyone some time. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 14:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Gottagotospace (talk) 23:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Muboshgu. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been protected since 2012, ostensibly to prevent vandalism. Edits to page are not frequent enough (around ten in a given year) to merit permanent semi-protection. Furthermore, the administrator responsible for the page (User:Anthony Appleyard) is now deceased. 173.80.125.4 (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Actually it's been protected only since 2019, not 2012. However, I agree that the level of activity is low enough that we can try unprotecting this. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Are you sure the lack of activity isn't because of protection thwarting or deterring vandals? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult if not impossible to be certain, but in cases like this article, it's worth trying unprotection to see how it goes. The worst case is that significant levels of vandalism resume and the previous protection is restored. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by new User(s).   Aloha27  talk  18:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing via mass-removal of content by various IPs. Possibly one individual proxy-hopping, but it's been going on for nearly 3 months. Theknightwho (talk) 22:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism several IPs. Adakiko (talk) 04:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Too many changes to the title of the article without discussing on talk page. This topic also involved the use of the meaning of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and of the European Free Trade Association within the article. Kroby36 (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Kroby36: I gather move protection was wanted? Let me know if something more is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent external link spam target. Pahunkat (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Seems to be an ongoing edit war with no discussion. GMGtalk 11:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restoring and lengthening protection that had expired in December. Will log at CTOPS (as had been done last year). Surprised the article was unprotected for this long. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeing the history with article is consistently edited by IP’s changing the template parameters, adding unsourced information. EntrepreneurPedia (talk) 12:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Five years of semi ended a couple of months ago, and if this ensued, indef was clearly necessary all the time. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 12:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Dieter Lloyd Wexler: An admin here cannot see why the edits are vandalism. I protected it but if problems continue, please explain the problem on the article talk page and try to engage the IP there. Johnuniq (talk) 04:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:34, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of IP vandalism due to the Israel-Hamas war. 2600:1700:57F0:4A50:98B5:F24E:873D:F0DC (talk) 03:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 04:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 07:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption, crude ethno-nationalist POV pushing and source falsification. Khirurg (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS under CT/EE Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Has been trolled by over a dozen socks for the past few days. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/novembre 14. Air on White (talk) 23:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The collateral damage isn't worth it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – People keep reverting my edits to the page, when I'm trimming fat from the article. Full protection, temporary, to prevent edit warring. Nearly but not perfect (talk) 00:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @I'm not perfect but I'm almost: Don't edit war. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Multiple IP users have vandalised this page in the past month. Seems to be a recurrent subject of vandalism. Recommend permanent pending changes protection or temporary semi-protection. Adam Black talkcontribs 05:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content. Wikibear47 (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article hasn't even been edited in the last three weeks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP and perhaps WP:1RR. IanDBeacon (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The original reason for semi-protection was the increased traffic and subsequent vandalism the page experienced in 2022. (Around the time of her sexuality being news.) Significant time has passed since then, and there is no good reason to maintain the semi-protection so many years later. Notakeyring (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ComplexRational: as protecting admin per the bright yellow instruction at the top of this section. Favonian (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected Looking at the edit history and page views since then, as well as another recent bout of coverage following the subject's 21st birthday, it seems likely that unprotecting the page now would bring about significant disruptive edits and call for reprotection, so I believe maintaining the current protection is justified. Complex/Rational 03:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for a longer period: Inappropriate expansion of plot summaries by IP after page got unprotected. M S Hassan (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @M S Hassan: The edits do not appear to meet vandalism. Please explain the issue on article talk and try to engage with the IP. Johnuniq (talk) 04:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Article concerning fringe political organisations that seems to be subject to repeated recent editing activity by recently created, single-purpose accounts with suspected links to the organisation in question. Believe Extended-Confirmed protection necessary, temporary at first, to prevent the issue. Rambling Rambler (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism following expiration of page protection. Adam Black talkcontribs 05:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logged in user now vandalising (created within 5 minutes of vandalism). Adam Black talkcontribs 06:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism by IP editor. Ckfasdf (talk) 06:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. Also, WP:REVDEL'd all the bigotry. At least I think I got all of it — let me know if I missed any, Ckfasdf, GraziePrego. El_C 07:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and unsourced material, requesting extended confirmed protection due to the page already being auto confirmed protected. RowanJ LP (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism GraziePrego (talk) 05:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 125.166.8.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month.
User(s) blocked: 125.164.232.0/25 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 08:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, the main problem are disruptive editing from obvious socks, example this ip [[106]], [[107]], [[108]] all have the same partial block and the same geolocation Theonewithreason (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:BALKANS. El_C 08:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resumption after last protect expired. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 10:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Changing the budget and box office without sources and explainations. GrabUp - Talk 07:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. just take a look at the page's history Abo Yemen 09:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article had semi-protection earlier this month which has now expired and consequently IPs are edit warring over the article again. TarnishedPathtalk 06:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Oh, Australia not UK, phew. El_C 12:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Racist edits and other BLP violations by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GS/PAGEANT. RE: Racist edits — feel free to provide diffs for WP:REVDEL, Borgenland. El_C 10:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Borgenland (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That one range is quite the rabbit hole (3 months block for them) and otherwise all revdels Done. Thanks. El_C 11:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 11:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 11:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, original research and inappropriate edits. Mehedi Abedin 11:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism and disruptive editing of a BLP article over the past few days by numerous IP users. Sigma440 (talk) 12:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There has been a persistent effort to add WP:COPYVIO content to this page, which had to be revdeled repeatedly. It would be useful to put it under semi-protection and see if it helps. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The insertion of copyrighted materiel occurs so frequently that semi-protection is warranted. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... Bharwad is cowherd(Gopalak) and also known as Gop yadav [1][2][3][4]. Devendra gop bharvad (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Bharwad is not protected. Favonian (talk) 10:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: You can give this article some pending changes protection. I see a persistent amount of inappropriate humorous edits to this article (it is likely to be vandalism, but I am not sure) by IP editors, but I doubt that it is enough for semi-protection.

I do not even know if it is protected or not, since when I add the template for a protection icon/banner, it shows me nothing, not even if the article has pending changes protection.

The last time it was protected was from 18 May 2023 to 18 August 2023, and it could have had pending changes protection either in the meantime or after the expiration of the semi-protection. I do not know.

In summary, to curb current disruptive editing by IP editors, I think pending changes protection (to review all edits by new and unregistered users before they are visible to everyone) should be applied to reduce the need to block IP addresses (and many different addresses are involved there too). CarlFilip19 (talk) 11:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is already pending-changes protected (you cam see this via "view history", and then "view logs for this page". Lectonar (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thank you. CarlFilip19 (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – constant disruptive changing of pronouns. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 15:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. doclys (❀) 13:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 14:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequently vandalised by IP editors over the past several weeks. — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 16:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced information to BLP following speculation in press. Egghead06 (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To create a redirect to Template:Their, similar to the existence of Template:His. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 03:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The current protection status of the page limits the ability of a broader range of contributors to edit and improve its content. This restriction is particularly concerning given the page's apparent lack of political neutrality.

The article on "Whataboutism" exhibits a significant bias, predominantly reflecting a Western perspective. This bias skews the representation of whataboutism, often highlighting its use in contexts that criticize non-Western entities while downplaying or ignoring similar tactics employed by Western actors. This selective representation not only undermines the article's objectivity but also contravenes Wikipedia's core principle of maintaining a neutral point of view.

Allowing more contributors to participate in editing this page can facilitate a more balanced and comprehensive discussion. By reducing the protection level, we can ensure that diverse perspectives are represented, thereby enhancing the article's credibility and adherence to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality.

Thank you for considering this request. Your attention to ensuring the neutrality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content is greatly appreciated. 147.32.27.11 (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Whataboutism is not protected. Favonian (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Wanted to created a redirect at the title to Sapna Babul Ka... Bidaai. But looks like the page was indefinitely fully protected quite a while a back for sockpuppetry. I don't think those concerns should apply presently. Gotitbro (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, can the same be done for Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? 3 (needed to redirect it to Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon 3. Gotitbro (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: Forgot to ping. Gotitbro (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 17:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: (Hope I'm doing this at the right place) - 12 years ago the title "Elijah Collins" was salted. The previous one was about a different subject, but now there's a notable NFL player with this name (see Draft:Elijah Collins) and the protection is preventing the draft from being published. Thanks, BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It is imperative to protect the page for the new album Hit Me Hard and Soft by American singer and Grammy-winning artist Billie Eilish due to the numerous edits coming from anonymous/unsigned accounts with biased editorial and unreliable sources. The page is currently unprotected, allowing anyone to freely edit it. Hence, protection for this page is essential in the upcoming months.. Newpicarchive (talk) 13:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 16:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism. Dxeano (talk) 16:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IP vandals have edited the page and added racist remarks.I’m requesting a short protection to this page as it’s a constant issue. Dxeano (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There seems to be an IP editor persistently adding unsourced content and it seems to be a likely sock. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Yamla. Favonian (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Never ending disruption by IPs and new users, have lasted for countless years. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous biased editing by rolling IPs with no sources/discussion. Per discussion: Talk:First_Chechen_War#This_article_is_impossible GreenC 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. --IanDBeacon (talk) 15:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, please enforce. -- GreenC 17:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There has been quite a lot of unsourced drive by changes by IPs lately. Alaexis¿question? 19:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm requesting extended confirmation protection for the page. This is a current event receiving widespread coverage, as part of the Israel-Hamas War, which is a highly contentious topic. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is no stable name and both variants are controversial, WP:TITLECHANGES instructs us to default to the original title, which in this case is Tel al-Sultan massacre. Dylanvt (talk) 15:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. I am holding off on move-protection for now as there are requests to protect both names here (this one is currently the article). Daniel Case (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Also removals of sourced content. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Welcome Vanchay (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Article is not, and never has been, protected. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting move protection. Per WP:TITLECHANGES we should default to the original name until conensus is reached. Vandals have moved it a couple times against that policy to "Tel al-Sultan airstrikes". Dylanvt (talk) 15:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: The article title would violate NPOV. I have been moving the title back to Tel al-Sultan airstrikes. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not for you to decide, that's for a move discussion to decide. Dylanvt (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 16:03, 25 May 2024. Panian513 19:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looks like it's been an issue for much longer than that. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Nardog (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/GG. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Gottagotospace (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism; users continually remove information about two untitled South Park films set for next year on one of the tables but keeps the references supported for it. 2603:6081:893D:13AC:3C1D:47EB:4393:9C0A (talk) 18:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:ARPBIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR, non-EC editor edit warring attempting to introduce WP:SYNTH content. TylerBurden (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log. Daniel Case (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 May 2024

Reason: Recent sockpuppetry and IP interference with efforts to make articles conform to WP quality standards regarding formatting and sourcing. Reversion without stated rationale. Pages covered by WP:GS/PAGEANTS community sanctions. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: IP persists in adding, against talk page consensus, original research that misrepresents sources and is calling disagreement with them a vandal attack. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Highly likely IP COI-editing. Attempting to introduce promotional content into article, mostly unsourced or sourced to Skawakbox website. Thanks! Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 22:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced material by auto-confirmed users: If you look at the revision history, it shows a few users adding content that came from unreliable sources. Upgrade protection to Extended-Confirmed protected, this will decrease the amount of unsourced material being added by auto-confirmed users. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One of the recent autoconfirmed editors who's been reverted has had their account globally locked, while the other one has indicated a willingness to discuss on their talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article contains a person who recently passed away and is now being edited non stop. Swaggalicious (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Borgenland: Please take greater care to warn editors for the correct issue. Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia. The IP editor should have been warned for making unsourced changes, edit warring, or both, not "vandalism". Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 98.122.60.249 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I'm not suggesting they should be unblocked, but I was in the process of issuing a more specific warning. Their behavior had temporarily ceased after some user talk page discussions. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They went over that line and weren't exactly the most collegial. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring introducing an off-by-one error after repeated explanations. –Sincerely, A Lime 18:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:229D:D301:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting move protection, not edit protection. There is a move war going on, even as a move request is underway. Note, by the time an admin sees this, the page may be move back to its original Tel al-Sultan massacre instead. VR (Please ping on reply) 23:33, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protected indefinitely. El_C 01:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please ECP protect this page per WP:PIA. VR (Please ping on reply) 23:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent genre warring over the past two years. Air on White (talk) 23:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Aydoh8 (talk | contribs) 00:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 01:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WWE has mentioned Decree 900 on one of its QR code websites Mdavies1 (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Premeditated Chaos. El_C 02:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism from multiple IPs. jellyfish  01:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done — duplicate request. El_C 02:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uptick in vandalism by multiple IPs. jellyfish  01:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Premeditated Chaos. El_C 02:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is organized group supported by Somaliland Successionist state who want to hid the truth of Northern Somalia and non Isaaq Clans in North Somalia they deleted this page and all other pages related to Eastern Sanaag like Yube town page Jingo11 (talk) 00:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not sure about any one that, Jingo11, but the only edit to this redirect can be seen in the title move that took place back in 2007, and that's it. El_C 01:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is organized group supported by Somaliland Successionist state who want to hid the truth of Northern Somalia and non Isaaq Clans in North Somalia they deleted this page and all other pages related to Eastern Sanaag like Yube town page Jingo11 (talk) 00:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit this month and zero in April, so this is quite Stale. Though, granted, not to the extent of your WP:HORN-related request above that's circa... 2007, Jingo11. So please have a glance at some granted protection requests to see the level of activity that's usually expected. Thank you. El_C 01:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Iam not talking about last couple of months but since creation of this page
you can check how many deletions were done on this page through the years Jingo11 (talk) 01:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not pertinent to protection requests (i.e. the protection policy). Again, there are activity thresholds—days and (a couple of) weeks, not months and years—so you need to align your requests with these. Only under the most egregious circumstances (like WP:LIBEL, WP:CHILDPROTECT, etc.) are these disregarded. El_C 01:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The content is only for class project user don't want to violate any copyright rule. After 1 month the content can be deleted. 2409:40E0:103C:487:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 06:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (Bharwad is known as Cowherd or Gopalak) .[1] [2][3]Devendra gop bharvad (talk) 03:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://books.google.co.in/books?id=XI-8EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA130&dq=Cowherd+Bharvad&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwihubvE5qiGAxXnklYBHdSGA38Q6AF6BAgLEAI. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Text "Report on the Prevalence & Characters of Leprosy - Page 130" ignored (help)
  2. ^ Cite book|The Mers of Saurashtra: An Exposition of Their Social ... - Page 27|url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xWABAAAAMAAJ&q=Bharwad+cowherd&dq=Bharwad+cowherd&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&printsec=frontcover&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjn28Cy6aiGAxXYr1YBHf3RBeIQ6AF6BAgJEAI
  3. ^ Cite book|Summary of Events of the Administration of the Gondal State:|url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MURvXrT9xyAC&pg=RA5-PA15&dq=Bharwad+cowherd&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjn28Cy6aiGAxXYr1YBHf3RBeIQ6AF6BAgGEAI
Declined As you have been told before: please use an edit request, the article talk-page is not protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per PIA. Air on White (talk) 09:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It got moved to Draft:Palestinian civilian involvement in the October 7th attacks but it definitely still needs ECP. Air on White (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. El_C 12:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring between multiple accounts and IPs. Air on White (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User talk:Inal-mn#Block.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruption of RfC by block evading sock. Refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orchomen. TarnishedPathtalk 10:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits to this page are getting reverted. This is nothing but disruption. Please semi-protect indefinitely. (I wrote this page years ago about a thousand-year old events, and there isn't much new information that needs to be added. Most edits are just WP:POV edits.). Kautilya3 (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done — as WP:ARBIND. El_C 12:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP editor, it was reverted by 3 different editors. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of problematic edits by IP users since April 2024. Mann Mann (talk) 13:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:GS/PW. El_C 13:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was deleted and redirected to Socialist Appeal (UK, 1992) following discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 2024) and there is also an active RM on the redirect target. But IP editor has repeatedly recreated with forked concent, some copied from the redirect target. Should be reverted and semi protection applied, pending a consensus otherwise.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully the RM closes by then. – robertsky (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In WP:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 2024) discussion the dominant opinion was to keep it the result was to keep it! Then it was vandalized by making it a redirect. Please either remove your protection of the redirect or Restore the page and then protect it. 2A02:8109:B511:9F00:4C6F:D88F:767F:A01E (talk) 13:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The decision was not to "keep" the page as was, but to "keep and revert", which meant returning it to the status as the Socialist Appeal page. There wasn't a consensus for retaining any sort of content at the Revolutionary Communist Party page, and that is also the subject of the active RM. I suggest you try to argue your case there rather than persistently recreating a page that has been redirected.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Not True
  2. In your opinion what should happen for this page to exist? Because the situation clearly changed. In which talk page should it be decided??
2A02:8109:B511:9F00:4C6F:D88F:767F:A01E (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1. If you are questioning the consensus of the AfD, this is not the right place. Contesting the AfD should have been done at WP:DRV, but the current requested move discussion functions nicely for this purpose now.
2. Right now what you can do is:
  1. demonstrate that the new name is the new common name in the current requested move discussion, see WP:NAMECHANGE. For this to work, there should be a sustained coverage in reliable, third party sources, of the new party, and not just for these few days since the refounding. Given the long-term significance of the previous incarnation, one may likely argue that the LTS of the old name trumps the new name until after the elections is over. For many other topics requesting name change here, we typically advise people to wait for at least three months before requesting for a move. Failing which,
  2. start a new article, in this case, a new draft and wait for it to be reviewed and accepted at Articles for Creation given the clear meatpuppetry and COI activity surrounding the topic.
– robertsky (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the answer. Giving the fact that i advocate for the preservation of the Socialist Appeal Article. I will try the second method. Thanks again :) 2A02:8109:B511:9F00:4C6F:D88F:767F:A01E (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent IP vandalism due to negative attention from the subject's sister, Caroline Kwan. Recommended duration of 7 days. See talk page for more information. Bro-zoned (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Considered WP:ECP as Palestine-Israel related content, but maybe keep it in the back burner for now. El_C 15:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC) for more information. Bro-zoned (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article has been attracting BLP vandalism from various IPs since Thursday. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should take us through the election. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – robertsky (talk) 16:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (jokes about being a parent) Cerebral726 (talk) 16:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpupptry IP vandalism Catfurball (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 02:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unexplained deletion of content with switching IPs. Nobody (talk) 08:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP editors. Bungle (talkcontribs) 10:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 18:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 18:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was protected due to a controversy involving the subject 10 days ago. Now that it's been unprotected, it's been vandalised about 11 times since. Could do with a longer term protection. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 20:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Multiple edits by newer accounts about student protests relating to the current Gaza conflict WP:PIA. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there have been numerous edits coming from anonymous or unsigned accounts, which often include biased tone with an unreliable sources WP:DE. Currently, the page is unprotected, allowing anyone to make edits without restrictions. Hence, it is crucial to ensure the protection of this page. Newpicarchive (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Article is the target of an IP-hopper who continually attempts to portray a high-level public servant as deceased but has been unable to come up with any source more reliable than one quoting a local version of WP:DAILYMIRROR. Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked blocked by Daniel Quinlan. The disruptive IP editor is blocked from editing that page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent levels of vandalism from IP accounts as well as new accounts that are solely made to vandalize the page. IDKFA-93 (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Mufcsa4cho09 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

29 May 2024

Reason: Hello everyone. I kindly ask you if it is possible to make a specific section of the "Fortune Global 500" page non-editable and specifically "Breakdown by country/territory". I kindly ask you to read the talk page of the page. In the last month there have been continuous attempts at editing CONTRARY to the fundamental principles of Wikipedia.

Specifically, the SOURCE cited "Global 500". Fortunes. Retrieved October 23, 2023" EXPLICITLY indicates that, for 2023, the United States is first with 136 companies and China is second with 135 companies.

Some editors continue to change the figure to indicate that China has 142 companies. In fact, they add 7 Taiwanese companies to the 135 companies in China.

However, this is contrary to what is reported in the SOURCE and allows a POLITICALLY MOTIVATED SUBJECTIVE POINT OF VIEW to prevail.

Taiwan is considered a territory and therefore its companies should not be added to those of China.

I therefore ask you to leave the data for 136 companies for the United States and 135 for China unchanged and ineditable.

This request is driven only by technical considerations, relating to RESPECT for the principles of Wikipedia and not political ones. In fact, Taiwan is not a de jure country.

Thank you Chrisques5 (talk) 19:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It is all or nothing. – robertsky (talk) 21:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing BLP violations re: Momoa's relationship status. Various IPs involved. KH-1 (talk) 02:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the title to "The Ontario Center" due to rename of the Richland Mall to The Ontario Center. Braitcapital (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – This would require consensus at the article talk page. Please submit a move request by following the instructions at WP:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism in the past day by two blocked VOAs and one new account whose sole edit has been to vandalize again. However, there have also been productive edits by IPs in the past few days. Air on White (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) edited Air on White (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA; company is an alleged arms provider to Israel. Air on White (talk) 22:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The edit log is basically half reversions of vandalism, many of which are RevDel. Request indef semi to stop this. Raladic (talk) 01:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Has been targeted by this LTA's very socks. Air on White (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. project pages like this shouldn't be attracting anon editors too much. – robertsky (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Robertsky. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users made a lot of disruptive edits to this page. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:70CA:8071:F98E:C4F5 (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Israeli historical film about an Israeli soldier's witnessing of a massacre of Palestinian refugees by a Lebanese military group. Needs protection under ARBPIA. Air on White (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 00:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 01:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Poor quality edits from IP users adding unsourced information and the subject's height being changed frequently Michaeldble (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone. I kindly ask you if it is possible to make a specific section of the "Fortune Global 500" page non-editable and specifically "Breakdown by country/territory". I kindly ask you to read the talk page of the page. In the last month there have been continuous attempts at editing CONTRARY to the fundamental principles of Wikipedia.

Specifically, the SOURCE cited "Global 500". Fortunes. Retrieved October 23, 2023" EXPLICITLY indicates that, for 2023, the United States is first with 136 companies and China is second with 135 companies.

Some editors continue to change the figure to indicate that China has 142 companies. In fact, they add 7 Taiwanese companies to the 135 companies in China.

However, this is contrary to what is reported in the SOURCE and allows a POLITICALLY MOTIVATED SUBJECTIVE POINT OF VIEW to prevail.

Taiwan is considered a territory and therefore its companies should not be added to those of China.

I therefore ask you to leave the data for 136 companies for the United States and 135 for China unchanged and ineditable.

This request is driven only by technical considerations, relating to RESPECT for the principles of Wikipedia and not political ones. In fact, Taiwan is not a de jure country.

Thank you. Chrisques5 (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chrisques5: Protection is page-level and cannot be done for specific sections. Even if this were possible, you requested this on the page for requesting edits for the page. You want to request protection at WP:RFPP/I. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 23:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. As mentioned by Jéské Couriano, this is not possible. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am hoping someone is able to assist me in updated the 2024 Miss Arizona USA's name on the winners list. Her legal name is actually just the letter K, however someone posted Kristina which is incorrect. If you refer to the Miss Arizona USA's social media pages you can see they also have her name listed as just the letter K.

If you need any communications from Miss Arizona USA herself, please let me know.

Thank you! Drlopez3129 (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. We would need a reliable source such as a newspaper story to make this change. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism over at least one month. Air on White (talk) 04:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: @Air on White: Which specific edits are vandalism and why? (Other administrators, please feel free to handle this request after a response or if you believe you have enough information already.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most recent edits add content that does not improve the article while introducing MoS vios that they refuse to discuss even after being reverted. Meanwhile, [111] is an unsourced change. These editors have engaged in disruptive editing and several have been blocked. Air on White (talk) 04:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The one edit you've linked is from May 9th. I'm going to protect the article because there's IP block evasion from a blocked editor, but this would be a declined request otherwise. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Now it's protected. Favonian (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP Vandalisms; see Revision history. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow editwar going on with one user repeatedly adding unsourced information. The Banner talk 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – anon sock of User:Earth6282, carrying on same edit-warring deletion. Wikishovel (talk) 11:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The one-month and two-month PP protected from IP vandalism, but each time it started back up again one week after the protection ended. It is the same specific vandalism each time and is being driven by a popular youtuber who is a self-described enemy of the BLP subject.   ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent spate of IP disruptive editing. Amigao (talk) 13:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm unsure if this is suitable for protection since it's more minor than most cases, but I thought I'd ask just in case: high percentage of disruptive editing (whether intentional or not), mostly from IPs; the easiest to find diffs for was changing infobox parameters to incorrect values (1, 2) and addition of unsourced material (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). It's been persistent since at least the 24th (when the rollercoaster opened). Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 13:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time vandalism target. Usable edits by IPs are exceedingly rare. Not sure which duration would be best. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's been a long time since this was protected. Let's start with a month of pending changes and see how that works. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Country page should be protection because lots of IP address. and new users edit this page. Rahio1234 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Djdijdijkidiso (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A series of IP edits to this WP:BLP (uncited allegations) have been getting added and then deleted over recent days. A period of semi-protection could be appropriate.. AllyD (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There's much more detail in my ANI report from earlier today, but tl;dr an unregistered user has been adding the same information about PredictIt's Better Business Bureau rating to the page for the past three years. I believe Better Business Bureau is not a reliable source because its rating depends on user reports, and it seems other users who have undone this IP's edits in the past think the same.

Since this user's IP constantly changes, both warning and blocking are ineffective, and so I've been referred here by replies on ANI. Iiii I I I (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. IP editor partially blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected due to slow motion edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Genre warring IP hopper. Air on White (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A number of IPs and logged out COI editors are being disruptive here Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

30 May 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 14:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Contentious topic; previous protection has expired. Ekdalian (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bishonen | tålk 21:05, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive activity by IP users due to uncertainty about the manager's future Michaeldble (talk) 19:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!00:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: IPs repeatedly removing content sourced to WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 19:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CT/A-I B3251 (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent unsourced death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it has been sourced by now. Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it has. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. See above discussion. Please submit a new request if needed. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Eastern Europe and the balkans. 48JCL (talk) 21:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 23:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And removing PC as this makes it suprefluous. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing, removal of sources. ([112] [113]) This is not the first time this person has done so, and the page was previously semi-protected as a result. Suggest ongoing semi-protection. Cyberlink420 (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Gottagotospace (talk) 02:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 15:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated edits using past participle "was" for a service that is not officially defunct. Wii174 | (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated talk page spam by IPs. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 20:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced edits and excessive photos. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 14:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. @Johnny Au: Page protection is usually not the best solution for problematic edits from a single user. Also, please don't use the minor edit flag for non-minor edits. For example, if you're adding a comment due to some sort of disagreement or adding or removing words in a way that alters the meaning of an article, it's not a minor edit. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs Adakiko (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Gfoley4. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully unprotect. This very low-visibility page was put under (indefinite? I think?) pending changes protection in July 2018 by Ronhjones, an admin who sadly is no longer with us. Since, it's only gotten two reverts, one of which was automated. The other, from November 2022, appears to have been made by a PC1 reviewer and is the most recent revert of any kind at this article. PC1 is doing nothing but serving as an obstacle for good work, like the two changes an anonymous editor made today. City of Silver 02:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sourced edits being removed. 141.239.235.96 (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce WP:CT/AP IanDBeacon (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: All direct pages related to South Korea and South Korea Tourism should be put in semi-protect or protect ASP, the South Korea goverment wants to use wiki for publicity and break the impartiality bias of wiki[[114]]
Meganinja202 (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued number-changing by IP-hopping vandal. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 05:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent spam of outlets/scam websites since unprotection. Had a look, would appear that the real website is pellepelle[.]com and they seem to be aware of a spam problem. Also suggest pblocking Mariaanjan1998 or an outright indef. Pahunkat (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Mariaanjan1998 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indef as a SOA. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An autoconfirmed user keeps disrupting the page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 00:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely.
User(s) blocked: JohnWickChapter4 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article and talk page for 3 months to discourage any attempt to PGAME up to extended-confirmed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs. Most new users don't know what guestbooks are anyways. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 01:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 23.251.65.183 (talk · contribs) blocked by Alexf. for 48 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edits from apparent sockpuppets have continued despite semi protection. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 04:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been extended confirmed protected since October 2023. Ymblanter (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is my Personal page Pranaykisaningale (talk) 09:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This page does not exist on en.wikipedia. If you mean the page on mr.wikipedia, there is nothing we can do for that. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Azercell Telecom LLC is a leading telco company in Azerbaijan serving more than 5 million customers. Therefore, Azercell’s public image is very crucial issue for us as it has direct impact on how our customers, partners and other stakeholders perceive us. In order to protect our image, we constantly publish updates and share important news on public channels including Azercell’s Wikipedia page. Our Wikipedia page is one of the go-to sources of our stakeholders while building partnerships or collaborations. Thus, we frequently update our Wikipedia page with relevant and updated information. However, we recently face some issues where some Wikipedia users make irrelevant edits in our page misleading page visitors to inaccurate or false information. Continuous disruptive edits have compromised the quality and accuracy of the information provided. Since it is our priority to protect our brand as a leading telecommunications company and ensure our Wikipedia page remains a reliable source of information for readers, we request for page protection allowing for more controlled and accurate updates by verified contributors to avoid any attacks or biased edits made by some groups aiming to harm our image. Riyad Aliyev Azercell (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I think you have us confused with Facebook. Please read WP:BOSS and WP:NOTSOCIAL. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I laughed so hard. Auzandil (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Ymblanter (talk) 12:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Looks like school vandalism, so a few hours semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 12:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., ping me if they continue from a different IP, I will protect then. Ymblanter (talk) 12:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create the page as a redirect to digraphs and trigraphs (programming). "??!" is a trigraph in C and C++ that corresponds to the pipe. Currently blocked by the MediaWiki:Titleblacklist for "excessive punctuation or repetition". Nickps (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks now circumventing semi-protection. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DoneFavonian (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A series of IPs have since March this year persistently made joke/vandalism edits changing the heading "Form and metre" to "Form and meter" despite the British English setting and a comment beside the heading; Drmies has blocked an IP for this but at least 2 others are continuing the assault. A temporary protection will not be enough given the persistence and multiple IPs, so this mature article (it's a GA) needs permanent protection at this point. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. – Annoying, but fairly low-frequency vandalism, probably a side effect of the subject being taught in schools. If PC proves insufficient, semi is an option. Favonian (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DoneFavonian (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection here seems to date way back to 2012 due to spam, something which would presumably be much lessened now as forums are a less widespread format Iostn (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Wikipedia:TRYUNPROT. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP edits treating website placeholder text as meaningful announcements. Another editor's warning on IP's Talk page was ignored repeatedly. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 04:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – two months. EdJohnston (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-hopper having an issue with the word "softly". The Banner talk 09:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change "An electric current is a flow of charged particles,[1][2][3] such as electrons or ions, moving through an electrical conductor or space." to "An electric current is the flow of a charge around an electrical conductor or through space." Reason: The DRIFT section lower down has it right. Up here, it's very wrong. Wiki should not promote wrongness or contradict itself. Please see here: "Drift speed The mobile charged particles within a conductor move constantly in random directions, like the particles of a gas. (More accurately, a Fermi gas.) To create a net flow of charge, the particles must also move together with an average drift rate. Electrons are the charge carriers in most metals and they follow an erratic path, bouncing from atom to atom, but generally drifting in the opposite direction of the electric field. The speed they drift at can be calculated from the equation: v = I n A Q {\displaystyle v={\frac {I}{nAQ}}} where v {\displaystyle v} is the drift velocity I {\displaystyle I} is the electric current n {\displaystyle n} is number of charged particles per unit volume (or charge carrier density) A {\displaystyle A} is the cross-sectional area of the conductor Q {\displaystyle Q} is the charge on each particle. Typically, electric charges in solids flow slowly. For example, in a copper wire of cross-section 0.5 mm2, carrying a current of 5 A, the drift velocity of the electrons is on the order of a millimetre per second. To take a different example, in the near-vacuum inside a cathode-ray tube, the electrons travel in near-straight lines at about a tenth of the speed of light. Any accelerating electric charge, and therefore any changing electric current, gives rise to an electromagnetic wave that propagates at very high speed outside the surface of the conductor. This speed is usually a significant fraction of the speed of light, as can be deduced from Maxwell's equations, and is therefore many times faster than the drift velocity of the electrons. For example, in AC power lines, the waves of electromagnetic energy propagate through the space between the wires, moving from a source to a distant load, even though the electrons in the wires only move back and forth over a tiny distance. The ratio of the speed of the electromagnetic wave to the speed of light in free space is called the velocity factor, and depends on the electromagnetic properties of the conductor and the insulating materials surrounding it, and on their shape and size." 2003:E3:EF1C:62AA:25FC:EBCA:B8B7:B6EE (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – You have, correctly, made an edit request at Talk:Electric current#contradictory, sadly - entry paragraph is at odds with an excellent section further down to which I have added an {{edit semi-protected}} template to attract some attention. Favonian (talk) 15:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 04:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Belteshazzar. Leijurv (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 2 years. EdJohnston (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by an IP user (using different IP addresses) that fails to engage in discussions or respond to warnings. Gawaon (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So it really is Sockpuppetry 70.50.199.125 (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say it's just a single not logged in user, whose address changes from time to time. I count the following IP addresses, all making the same two non-constructive edits, often repeatedly: 81.18.84.213, 2A02:2F0E:510B:A500:9105:1146:1E36:EE54, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:3881:E5A3:E19E:35FE, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:3CC7:5443:45F0:2543, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:6001:D309:299:F6F3, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:7D43:A64E:BE08:6B5B, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:847C:6D53:717:F3B2, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:E58C:1A4:630C:2D5A, 2A02:2F0E:610B:6600:F05B:D7BF:98DB:559A. Gawaon (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2a02:2f0e:4000::/34 (talk · contribs). Also 81.18.84.213 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Partial blocks from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Editing from Srimonbanik2007 socks, named and IP. Ravensfire (talk) 17:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP pushing info from blocked sock Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 19:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent unsourced changing of population estimates, removing maintenance tags, etc by IPs for the last several months. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 20:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Favonian (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Under attack from rotating IP for the last few days. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP attempts to add name of infant child to the page Qflib (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite pending changes protection: This page has been the subject of low-frequency but persistent vandalism built around repeatedly inserting a joke from a 2013 Game Grumps video. The most recent example: [115] This has been going on for at least ten years, and so is unlikely to stop any time soon. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 20:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing resumed by LTA after page protection expired. HorrorLover555 (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Belteshazzar. Leijurv (talk) 06:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Belteshazzar. Leijurv (talk) 06:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Belteshazzar. Leijurv (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Belteshazzar. Leijurv (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We need to protect this there are a lot of fake entries added all the time Freedun (yippity yap) 21:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

31 May 2024

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs Tammbecktalk 11:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Idiosincrático (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent & ongoing sockpuppetry/vandalism from IPs & named accounts regarding Johann van Beethoven birthdate. Cited sources only state a circa year, not the unsourced November date that various accounts keep on adding to this article - see this and this etc. Shearonink (talk) 13:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A dynamic IP has been reverting against an AfD consensus without making improvements. I'm nominally involved, so filling this as a request. It may be possible to rangeblock the IP, but it seems like there's some unrelated activity on the range (still, p-blocking it from this page in particular may be the cleanest solution). signed, Rosguill talk 14:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent and non-stop IP vandalism. Random IPs keep on deleting source information, saying Boris Sokolov is not a historian despite giving no source nor using proper grammar, and ignoring the multiple other sources which cite his numbers and find them to be reliable, including Frieser and Toeppel.Reaper1945 (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please enforce as WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Gottagotospace (talk) 17:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous IP vandalism lately. Arminden (talk) 21:32, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edits are coming from non-autoconfirmed users; not necessary to use extended-confirmed protection yet. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated instances of vandalism from what is likely one committed vandal. The same vandal edit is made by the same (or similar) IP range. Requesting temporary semi-protection or IP range topic ban. Yue🌙 00:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Targeted by Bulgarian IPs. WP:LTA/DTHD. –LDM2003 talk to me! 15:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Suckpuppetry by confirmed accounts. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 01:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Ccole2006 (talk) 04:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. He died six years ago and the article mentions absolutely nothing about the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent NPOV and MOS violations by editor who thinks that reverting him means you're part of a conspiracy to destroy the subject transit system. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: DrRamaKrishnanKalpathySundaram (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:248:C400:0:0:0:0:0/40 (talk · contribs). Warned many times for making similar unsourced and poorly sourced edits over the last year with six warnings in the last 7 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant additions of unsourced content by IPs and possible edit warring. As a highly trafficked page, this has been a problem for a long time. Bneu2013 (talk) 02:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Recreating hoax Vizag Victors following their block: please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vallabharebel. Wikishovel (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by RoySmith. @Wikishovel: Please see Wikipedia:Protection policy § Blocked users; please contact the blocking administrator when someone is misusing their talk page access instead of requesting protection. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism 37.111.211.145 (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 48JCL (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No edits from non-extendedconfirmed users in years. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article is within scope of WP:ARBECR. Therefore, it follows that it should be extendedconfirmed protected. Additionally, there is persistent disruption by non-EC editors/IPs, an avoidable cost to the community that could be reduced via EC protection. Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Not only that, Western Sahara is a very disputed topic. 48JCLTALK 02:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing since the beginning of this month, and the user responsible has been indeffed as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained content removal by IP. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 03:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 06:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – i apply for full protection to avoid future coming edit war. Coddlebean (talk) 05:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Unreferenced edits from a newly registered account. Hotwiki (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent Unreferenced edits from a newly unregistered account. Hotwiki (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Bashe.online (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined We can only process requests for the English Wikipedia here. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No body is editing twleve tweleve years ago on 13:25, 28 November 2012 Lectonar said. ( "lets wait some more years") but nobody is vandalizing anymore many years ago it used to be popular and is not notable any more. 46.37.116.130 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Further pronoun violations after protection expired yesterday. GnocchiFan (talk) 07:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous tempering of results by IPs. Borgenland (talk) 09:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should be enough time for the results to settle down and editing to be "tempered". Daniel Case (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies I didn't notice the typo. To be specific they were misplacing results by erasing constituencies. Borgenland (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalishh. 2A00:1FA3:677:9068:0:69:5844:3F01 (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Page has seen an increase in disruption recently, likely due to their participation in the upcoming 2024 NBA Finals, including multiple IPs claiming they'd already won something that won't start until next week: ([117], [118]). The finals are scheduled to run through June 23 if all seven games are necessary, so activity should go back to normal shortly after that. Egsan Bacon (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reviewing the article history shows that vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts continues year-round, not just during the playoffs or even the season. Daniel Case (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and unsourced content; potential genre war going on. Carlinal (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have already given them a level 2 ... the first warning they got in five days. Daniel Case (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. mwwv converseedits 13:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always the same IP for the last week or so. Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar protection expired a few days ago. Leijurv (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Requesting protection per the WP:GS/AA topics restriction, broadly construed, as the article mentions Armenian genocide specifically [119], [120]. Also there is potential socking based on some recent edits, see confirmed sock and recent user edit for example of restoring the unreliable sourced 5.5 figure in infobox [121], [122]. Vanezi (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you think there's socking going on, report it at SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 14:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case please see the sockpuppet investigation, there has been extensive socking in the article too. And just now, a random IP who's likely a sockpuppet themselves [123] (edit summary justification similar to the blocked sock [124]), reverted in the WP:GS/AA restricted article. Could you please protect the page? Vanezi (talk) 15:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not entirely clear this is, in fact, vandalism. Statements are added that XYZ is "currently" the MLA and then removed. Without any context, this may simply be an editor (clumsily) applying MOS:RELTIME. The "current" MLA is listed and then removed, however, that MLA was only just elected two weeks ago and it's not clear the LA has officially opened yet, ergo, he might not actually be appropriate for the infobox as he hasn't been formally invested into office (?), I don't know. These are all things that would need to be discussed at the Talk page. But there's no discussion. There's possibly some 3RR occurring, but that needs to be reported at the noticeboard and doesn't, by itself, justify protection. Maybe I'm missing something, in which case let me know. Chetsford (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a moving IP address. A 7 day protection was applied on 20 May but since its expiry the vandalism has continued. JP (Talk) 18:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 18:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: as the event in question has been the subject of atrocity denialism and historical revisionism, it would be best this page was given a protected status for the sake of deterring vandalism Bird244 (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Bird244: 2 months may not be sufficient given the history of the article, but let's start there. If disruptive edits resume after protection expires, please submit another request. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: high level of vandalism by IP and new registered user with same edits. orangkalideres - talk - contribs 19:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Include updates to his International statistics. GasganoWasHere (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Victor Hedman is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]