Jump to content

User talk:CFA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Clearfrienda)
👤 User 💬 Talk ✏️ Contributions ✉️ Email me

Editions to Meet the press article

hello, In my opinion, it was enought good, it would have been easy check from youtube. I understand that rules and my opinion may be in conflict and rules always win.

I did now add plenty of citations (maybe too many, but i did try point pattern), and did try again. 2001:14BB:67F:DF14:4454:D21B:C08A:ABA9 (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, in upper there reed that

"Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits"

It was not wandalism, it was clearly good faith edit. I could cry about this to someone, but i don't mind, i hope you remember next time what is right way to do. Some one else could say Keep your damn jack! And it would be lose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BB:67F:DF14:4454:D21B:C08A:ABA9 (talk) 23:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for adding a citation, though it appears someone else reverted your most recent edit. I never claimed your edit was vandalism or not in good faith. C F A 💬 23:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not claim so, i just wanted point to you rules about rollbacking, because i notice that rule and to me your actions was in conflict with that rule.
How i can report user Neiltonks, because that user clearly broke that rollback rule and did not want fix citations and did not feel need try contact.

And i did try one time more. It is very fustrating see roll back after goodfaith editions.2001:14BB:67F:DF14:4454:D21B:C08A:ABA9 (talk) 00:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of us used rollback inappropriately. My edit summary was "Reverted edits by 2001:14BB:67F:DF14:4454:D21B:C08A:ABA9 (talk): not providing a reliable source " and Neiltonks didn't even use rollback to revert your edit. Rolling back your edit without an edit summary would have been inappropriate. C F A 💬 00:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then i have misunderstand terms and i am sorry for acusing based wrong understanding. But still my point stand, in my opinion you and that Neiltonks should have fix, not removing edits. But it is just my opinion.
I asume that my edit are now acceptable.
and thank you for constructive dialog. 2001:14BB:67F:DF14:4454:D21B:C08A:ABA9 (talk) 00:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from JaxxVault on Web page (20:17, 13 November 2024)

Hello how do I create my website --JaxxVault (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from GaylaKH (06:15, 14 November 2024)

I have prepared my submission in my GaylaKH sandbox and hit PUBLISHED. How do I submit it for through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process, which allows editors to review and approve it for publication. I couldn't find a banner that says "Submit your draft for review" to click on and submit it. --GaylaKH (talk) 06:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GaylaKH, someone has added the blue submission button to your sandbox. You can now click it to submit your draft for review. You might also be interested in reading Wikipedia's policy on autobiographies. Happy editing, C F A 💬 14:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. I can have someone else submit the bio if you prefer. Appreciate all that you do. My husband and I donate to Wiki and hope you continue to thrive. You have a great mission! GaylaKH (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #180 is out: New type: Rational numbers

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present you our newest Type, rational numbers, as well as the new renderer and parser for natural numbers, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Conservative Party (UK) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Seeking opinions: protection of the help desk and teahouse. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. C F A 💬 14:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly Resolution to restore autonomy: Revision history

I request you to review my draft Draft:The 2024 Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly Resolution to restore autonomy as you have already told me that I have done some mistakes that's why I did not put the article directly please let me know if this is right or I need to do some more revisions. :) Sarim Wani (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CFA: Sarim Wani (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. C F A 💬 13:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
got it :) Sarim Wani (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine "Katie" Breann Cooper redirect

A redirect that I created was put up for deletion, then voted to be kept and subsequently closed by you. The same person who put it up for deletion immediately put it up for speedy deletion. What can be done about this? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure what they're doing. Blethering Scot, there was clear consensus to keep at the RfD. C F A 💬 17:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About adding ai-generated tag

Hello, I came across your message you posted on my user page. I compiled information from various reliable sources and formatted new pages for new parlimentarians in Sri Lanka using an appropriate template to ensure clarity and consistency. I did use a language model to help refine grammar and wording where necessary, but the core research and structure were my own. Given this approach, would it still be necessary to tag the page as AI-generated? TIA. Indunil Chamara (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, because the text you're adding is 1) not at all neutral and 2) completely unsourced. As you are writing biographies of living people, it is very important to make sure all information is verifiable and cited. The text you are adding is also blatantly promotional. Please write using your own words. C F A 23:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-47

MediaWiki message delivery 01:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]