Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2024/11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2024

01 November 2024

Reason: In essence, IPs "demanding" that Wikipedia not write about a certain candidate as-is according to NPOV, claiming without reliable sources that another fits the bill (and that it's "biased", as expected). 2601AC47 (talk) 21:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of abuse language used toward a former cast member, Chris Herman. Zarroe (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, there is only one user, and the last edit was two weeks ago, making the block pointless as well. Ymblanter (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism Chalandray (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unauthorized groups editing to suit their personal views. 2605:59C8:7C8:810:3418:D285:3087:39D9 (talk) 01:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't know what an "unauthorized group" is here. Also, you could have warned them or, better yet, left them a note. Also, you could have explained your edit in an edit summary--all this, plus the complaint, is actually disruptive. Drmies (talk) 02:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping user repeatedly adds niche sub-genres not confirmed in any sources. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 09:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 01:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. Favonian (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Changing IP vandalizing infobox GoodDay (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Dennis Brown - 09:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Real photo of R3HAB keeps on changing to a wrong image Bellaved (talk) 05:26, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editors resumed after protection expired. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There's only been one IP edit, and they were blocked. Need more than a single instance to protect. Dennis Brown - 09:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:50, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 09:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Yes it has you silly bot, although I did ECP instead of semi, now fixed. Dennis Brown - 10:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Temporary protections did not work. Since this edit, there have been over 100 reverted vandalism/disruptive edits related to his presidency. MAL MALDIVE (talk) 11:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I thought I requested an edit protection, maybe I didn't. Persistent disruptive editing, battleground attitude from IPs and newly established accounts. Large reverts on a daily basis. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I was the fellow who declined the protection and blocked the /64, but your vandal switched addresses again. Thanks for the update. BusterD (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous addition of not English content by IP changing user. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:29, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: RFPP; restarting with indef because this has been so persistent until December 31, 2024 49.144.47.209 (talk) 07:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. This was indef semi-protected on the 29th. BusterD (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IPs, should be protected for 2 months until the auction. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 07:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I understand the suggested duration but we have no protection history here at all. We can quickly escalate duration if needed. BusterD (talk) 15:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent, persistent vandalism from anons changing the current mayor's name + other info. Please change to confirmed/autoconfirmed protection until sometime - a week would be nice - AFTER Election Day November 5th. Shearonink (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two disruptive editors since October 1st. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... Cardona, George (26 July 2007). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Routledge. p. 627. ISBN 978-1-135-79711-9.</ref> this “</ref>“ should be removed . 79.55.136.233 (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks for pointing it out! —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page talks about the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. 178.81.55.110 (talk) 09:11, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA WP:ECR. El_C 19:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 14:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:GS/PW. El_C 19:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent promotional editing from IP editors. Note that the version of this article on ruwiki has been protected for the same sort of edits, which seems to have moved the disruption here. MrOllie (talk) 17:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I've reviewed the edits, and they seem politically motivated. I'd recommend an RPP temporarily to keep Wikipedia neutral. Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 19:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:PIA, WP:ECR (related content only). El_C 20:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Thibaut (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE persistent disruptive editing by multiple Caste warriors. ®asteem Talk 20:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 21:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent edits from IP inserting personal unsourced address. The page is for a cult that has frequently been a target of IP edits and might benefit from longer-term protection if the trend continues. KoA (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think I revdel'd all of em. El_C 21:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals have noticed that protection expired. Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I think I revdel'd all of em (in the dozens). El_C 21:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I work for the organization and need to make significant updates to it's content. 67.85.82.69 (talk) 17:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Conflict of interest edits from your organization are the reason the article is pretected. You can request changes via the article talk page per WP:COIEDIT.-- Ponyobons mots 17:58, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of sourced content by IP and inaccurate edit summaries. See diffs:

[1] [2] [3] Ixudi (talk) 15:17, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Izno. for a month. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk if there isn't already one. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too active for pc at this time. El_C 22:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would also be ok with pending changes as well. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism CSP3945 (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2. El_C 22:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Izno. El_C 22:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 21:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The recently-problematic IP has just been blocked for one month. Meters (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Wikipedia:Child protection aspects (obviously). El_C 22:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 21:32, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The recently-problematic IP has just been blocked for one month. Meters (talk) 21:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Wikipedia:Child protection aspects (obviously). El_C 22:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP on a mission adding unsourced content or content not permitted by Infobox guides. Denniss (talk) 14:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:14C:8001:ABD0:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. for a year. I will also be putting a CTOPS notice on the talk page per WP:CT/CID. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP which has been the subject of persistent insulting vandalism by IP editors. ―Howard🌽33 23:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Unless I'm missing something (and let me know if I am), this article has not before been protected. While protection is currently warranted, going straight to indef might be overkill. However, a further period than 10 days may become necessary in the future. Chetsford (talk) 00:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing from various users in the past month alone. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism Sock-the-guy (talk) 17:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP Vandalism. Niasoh (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of slanted commentary by IP address Chalandray (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Please watch for WP:PROMO, observe WP:ONUS, Chalandray. Thank you. El_C 22:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One-week semi-protection: Ongoing dispute over infobox image - discussion is underway, and I'd like to freeze the article in its original state/avoid an edit war until said discussion's gone on for a little bit. The Kip (contribs) 23:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also leave a CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism for the last two weeks. The article has few edits, and minor reasons to be edited as a relatively inflexible list. GGOTCC (talk) 00:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This redirect was protected to stop IPs from making it an article. The day the protection expired, they removed the redirect again. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 01:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Page appears to be being targeted be possible AndresHerutJaim sock IP. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely.; will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Page appears to be being targeted by possible AndresHerutJaim sock IP. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Page appears to be being targeted by possible AndresHerutJaim sock IP. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Page appears to be being targeted by possible AndresHerutJaim sock IP. Sean.hoyland (talk) 02:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unhelpful changes by IPs due to here recent release by WWE on 1 November. Requesting 1-week semi-protection to avoid further disruption and keeping the article stable. Mann Mann (talk) 03:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:25, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very unusual vandalism from what appear the same accounts both logged in and logged out. Viriditas (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This kind of behavior is better dealt with at SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 23:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I am not seeing many reverts since the protection I imposed two months ago expired. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring by ip. BlueboyLINY (talk) 00:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. In fact, you have removed it there. Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has resumed. Lard Almighty (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting long-term semi-protection. This article is under attack by an IP who insists on adding "unreliable" to the first sentence. Zerotalk 11:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Blocked 24 hours for edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long-term protection is not the first step, see WP:PREEMPTIVE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Remsense ‥  11:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent BLP violations by IP editors. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 12:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The history of protection of this page warrants one year semi-protection to mitigate some of the issues that have occurred recently and the inability of PC to reasonably deal with the cadence of problematic edits. However, by my review, the edits introduced by autoconfirmed editors -- largely not rising to the level of BLP violations -- are of a different character than those made by the IP editors and the non-autoconfirmed editors and exist on the precipice of what could be characterized as a content dispute. Before EC is applied, there needs to be some evidence of discussion failing. However, there is no discussion on the article's Talk page and, insofar as I can tell, no discussion on the individual Talk pages of the editors in question. Chetsford (talk) 20:05, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Getting vandalized by IPs due to recent news events. Since I created the article years ago and have it on my watchlist, I'm recusing myself as involved, but if I were seeing this edit history for the first time I'd be very strongly considering some semi-protection Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As of the timestamp, by my count, there have been seven recent edits to the article, two of which were obvious cases of vandalism by IP editors, two were reverts of said vandalism, one was a zero byte copyedit, and two -- by registered editors -- added content that's probably WP:UNDUE and poorly sourced, but can be addressed through the normal process of discussion (however, the last attempt at discussion on the Talk page occurred two years ago). That said, I have no doubt that, due to recent events, PC protection will not be sufficient and will need to be adjusted to something more substantial. I'll plan to watchlist the article as well. Chetsford (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: No reason for this when the parent template isn't even protected. Gonnym (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • The reason you protect a redirect is not the same as the reasons you would protect the target. The target, Template:Hebrew audio, IS protected, btw, just at a lower level (semi). This makes sense as few people watch redirects, so the possibility of undetected vandalism is much higher for that redirect than the template. I'm not inclined to unprotect as I don't see how the protection is actually stopping anyone from making a legitimate edit, but will leave open for another admin to review. Dennis Brown - 09:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Concur with Dennis Brown. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has been blanked several times, or sourced information has altered, with editors noting a desire to keep the content secret. However, this is content that is already extensively reported in published and online sources. This page has existed and hosted essentially the same chart since 2005, but the first attempt to remove it was not until 2021. Maltice (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 60 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not sure 60 days will solve the underlying issue, but it's the best I can do given the short history of page protection. If this is insufficient, it can be re-reported and protection of longer duration applied. Chetsford (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't what happened, but there are multiple IPs vandalizing this page to insult this guy. I believe he won some competition, and people didn't like that. Gaismagorm (talk) 20:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content; I did some research but couldn't find any sources for the additions. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:23, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 22:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism since 16:01, 25 May 2024. Alith Anar 13:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While the article does appear to undergo spates of vandalism, in the last 30 days there has only been one instance of vandalism, by an IP editor which was almost immediately reverted. Our WP:NO-PREEMPT policy requires protection be applied for the shortest period possible to stop the disruption. There is no period of protection short enough to arrest a single instance of vandalism. However, if a pattern emerges, please re-report. Chetsford (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socking resumed 71.246.109.203 (talk) 21:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Long-term abuser User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. Gunther :  Talk  06:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 23:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring, COI editing, unsourced additions. Encoded  Talk 💬 18:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There have only been two recent problematic edits to this article, one by a probable WP:COI editor and the second almost certainly by the same editor forgetting to login to their account. At this time, there are less onerous way to mitigate this issue than protection. Only once those methods are exhausted can we protect this article. Chetsford (talk) 20:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 23:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being edited by socks of blocked accounts. Rht bd (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockpuppetry resumed. 71.246.109.203 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:33, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – CTOPS - has seen editing from non-EC users lately. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 23:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism, as well as blanking. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 10:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term repost of unreferenced sentence written in future tense, mostly from a single domain. The vandalism is being signed now with various Sri Lankan names in the edit summaries, so it's probably a bunch of kids having a laugh. Hiding the recent edit summaries might also deter future abuse when the protection expires. Wikishovel (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, the RevDel criteria do not allow that as a reason to hide edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 00:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and/or factual errors by various IP ranges since 3 October 2024. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content and/or factual errors by various IP ranges since 3 October 2024. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Edit-warring by new users, autoconfirmed but not extended-confirmed. Suggest ECP rather than full protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Izno. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Large amount of IP/possible sockpuppet editors with continual edit warring and original research. Red Phoenician (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Of course, the article is now up for deletion, so that may complicate efforts to keep it. Daniel Case (talk) 00:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs keeps adding promotional links to the page. SecretSpectre (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Ongoing IP spam. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:12, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As per WP:PP, it really needs to be a higher level of disruption before we protect an article talk page when the article is also protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent uptick in disruptive editing 71.246.109.203 (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 22:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – frequent Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gabriella~four.3-6 target. wizzito | say hello! 23:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 00:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term sporadic disruption on a highly controversial subject. This page is going to be a magnet for POV/PROFRINGE editing pretty much forever. Pending changes should slow that down. I am WP:INVOLVED. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:40, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism / disruptive editing from a user using multiple IP's. I T B F 📢 03:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Directly related to WP:PIA. M.Bitton (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. M.Bitton, is there substance behind your revert beyond Per WP:ARBECR? Because I don't like that being the sole reason mentioned. That is, but by itself, it comes across as one of my pet peeves, as seen in the essay Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" (i.e. non-substantive reasoning)... Otherwise, beyond this one single revert by you today, the page has not seen any meaningful edits, really, in many months. El_C 23:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: the notice at the top of the article (when trying to edit it) says "You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account" and my understanding of ARBECR is that non-EC editors are limited to making edit requests (related to articles within the topic area). Also, I did leave an appropriate welcome message on their talk page. That being said, I have no problem self-reverting (if you think that the revert was unnecessary in this instance). M.Bitton (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I have no opinion or objection to either the addition or its removal (I'm not allowed to). But you are allowed to object on various grounds, like WP:DUE, WP:RS, etc., so I'm just wondering if such reasoning exist in this instance. Otherwise, I'd be inclined to decline (inclined to decline?) as WP:PREEMPTIVE. Yes, I realize the instructions (for WP:ECR ≈ preemptive) is a bit contradictory, and that mileage does vary among admins for that. Regardless of what your answer is, I don't think you did anything wrong. I'm just trying to clarify if there's content grounds behind your revert, because if so, yes-protection; if not, likely not at this time. El_C 00:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: there is no content grounds behind the revert (for what it's worth, I think it's a good edit), I only reverted to enforce the restriction. M.Bitton (talk) 01:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wish you wouldn't do that (if the edits are good), but I suppose you can. Just kinda sucks. Thank you. DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism that i subtle vandalism since 2023 by mutliple users and has had multiple temporary protections. Bennyaha (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bennyaha: Which specific recent edits are vandalism? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1253101003] - with the editor adding "Locust" , weight of 150kgs and 5"10"
all not true Bennyaha (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add more
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1196115549] - subtle vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1190445412] - subtle vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1190410202] - subtle vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1189905776] - subtle vandalism claiming he was an employee when he was a co-owner
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1189903447] - vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1218547253] - vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1215447073] - vandalism
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dean_Lonergan&diff=prev&oldid=1214505621] - vandalism Bennyaha (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bennyaha: Thanks. That was not obvious given that 5'10" remains in the article and "Locust" appears in the list of references. You may want to replace the height and weight with a sourced number. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Callanecc: Semi-protection might be a good idea given the repeated subtle vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Daniel, I don't see that there's enough editing to warrant semi protection. Pending changes will still catch the vandalism as it'll appear as unsourced changes or as questionable BLP edits which should be picked up when being reviewed. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent incidence of IP user vandalism (appears to be the same person under multiple IP addresses, also throwing insults at whomever reverts their edits). HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 02:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by Long-term abuser User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. Gunther :  Talk  01:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued sockpuppetry after the expiration of protection. Aintabli (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:KURDS. El_C 06:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  04:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP and new users repeatedly introducing unsourced information. DL6443 (Talk/Contribs) 05:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 06:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I would like to request Extended confirmed protection for the The Bloodline article. There are too many accounts making too many changes against Wikipedia's policy and guidelines such as No original research, Fancruft as well as straight up vandalism by editors with no regard or little knowledge of how Wikipedia works and due to the popularity of the article there is simply no way to control it and it is slowly descending into chaos. This is why I request this and I hope this issue can be fixed. Lemonademan22 (talk) 14:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maybe you can show us some diffs where autoconfirmed editors have been doing these things? Because from the last month's history it looks like the current protection is working. Daniel Case (talk) 00:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply. At the start of the month and towards the end autoconfirmed editors (usually with no user page) have been adding unsourced material, changing paragraph subheadings, adding bare references and messing the article up. Today I had to change about a dozen things back to normal. The current protection, in my opinion, doesn't work and isn't sufficient if I have to go ahead and revert everything they do constantly. Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case is asking for links to specific edit diffs. If the issue for a particular diff may not be not obvious to someone unfamiliar with the topic, please note the issue. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Similar hijacking behavior as at Asia Cup 2020; resumed after other redirect was protected. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Spate of vandalism over the last few days. AntiDionysius (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – They're back after protection ended. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 11:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Three User:Bigboss19923 socks in a week, restoring the same content. Belbury (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP vandalism changing and removing film budget and boxoffice numbers. RangersRus (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs over a newly released film. Charliehdb (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent semi-protection. There are a lot of IP edits. Some are correct, but some introduce incorrect information. Bogazicili (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Bogazicili: We don't jump straight to indefinite protection. Also, none of the recent IP editors have been warned about making unsourced changes or anything else related to this article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – they're back after non-protection. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 10:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, the longer is the protection the better it is. Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have warned the editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Miki Filigranski (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting permanent semi-protection from IP vandals and their NOTFORUM posts. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 16:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 104.230.247.132 (talk · contribs) blocked by Antandrus. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – AfD closed as redirect 2 days ago but this has been reverted 3 times since. User has been warned but refuses to stop. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The user needs to be reported to WP:ANI or WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent reverting of the AfD closure. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The user needs to be reported to WP:ANI or WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent reverting of the AfD closure. Requesting protection to prevent further disruption. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The user needs to be reported to WP:ANI or WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Just read last edit summary. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:34d0:e0e0::/64 (talk · contribs). Blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent content removal by IP editor. Woodroar (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A post has appeared on Twitter that can, in my eyes, be seen as a clear sign of off-wiki canvassing towards a keep vote in this AfD. The base article doesn't appear to be the target for disruptive editing, however. I'm unsure if protection is the route but I'm not sure how else to deal with this. Departure– (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, it looks like it was headed towards a keep decision prior to that tweet. You can use Template:Canvassed on the page so the closer will be aware. The canvassing article that you linked has additional guidance at Wikipedia:Canvassing § How to respond to canvassing. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Contentious topic that is victim of unsourced additions by sock accounts (three accounts, maybe four). Semsûrî (talk) 10:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content by unconfirmed users. M48SKY (talk) 11:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE Persistent disruptive editing by multiple sock hoppers. ®asteem Talk 22:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent levels of vandalism, poor adherence to WP policy throughout the page from unconfirmed users. M48SKY (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Edit warring by newish users. McClenon mobile (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:16, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The IP addresses are back, has been semi-protected quite a few times previously. CNC (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sporadic continuing IP edits/vandalism on a highly contentious and controversial UK political event.
Intersection of race, right-wing politics, misinfo, and recentness suggests sporadic IP vandalism will continue for a bit longer. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – persistent vandalism on this BLP' article. MSLQr (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This protection need to extend to prevent anyone for adding negative reviews, with or without cite. VernardoLau (talk) 09:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: this belongs at WP:RFPP/I (although I suggest waiting until there are actual disruptive edits post-expiry). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Twinkle declined my page protection request because this is still open. IP vandalism returned fairly immediately after the previous protection expired (see also IP comments on the associated talk page). Sariel Xilo (talk) 01:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Last protect was in 2009, no reason to keep protected. Thanks!. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: unprotection is very likely to lead to a substantial amount of vandalism. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism to the Unity and Distinction section. 125AB (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Chetsford (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most of the last hundred edits to this article are either vandalism or reverting vandalism. As far as I can tell, no new editors have made constructive edits in that time (with the exception of a few editors reverting vandalism). The vandalism has come from many different IPs, so blocks would be ineffective. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. – Βατο (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on the page. Needs protection. Noorullah (talk) 02:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Chetsford (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same person multiple IPs falsifying credits. Range too large to block. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High vandalism to the Origins section. 125AB (talk) 18:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Chetsford (talk) 05:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs starting to make unconstructive comments again on an WP:ECR talk page, right after the protection ran out. Please semi-protect for a longer period. Hypnôs (talk) 23:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 05:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a consistent pattern of POV pushing and a biased agenda from this IP. IP user claims that Crimean Tatars are descended from Anglo-Saxon settlers during the Byzantine era. He is using a non-reliable news source about Anglo-Saxon settlers, but the source does not mention any connection between Crimean Tatars and Anglo-Saxons. In fact, last citation does not even contain word "Crimean Tatar" It'd be great if an advanced editor or administrator can shorten the Tatarization section of the article.

He also doing a similar thing to Crimean Goths. I attempted to discuss this issue with the editor on the talk page of Crimean Tatars 9 months ago, but they have continued to engage in edit warring in different time periods. Some of their IP addresses were blocked earlier this year. This is straight vandalism at this point. I request a page protection for few months. Auzandil (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: There seems to be a persistent battle between different parties that want to remove content because they do not like it One party seems to be Muslim and the other Hindu and there appears to be a lot sock pupery involved. Hardyplants (talk) 11:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of novice editors who still do not understand how Wikipedia rules work and modify articles and are soon subject to quick elimination or consensus. Joaquim Nero (talk) 07:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No disruptive activity I can see. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IPs and some autoconfirmed accounts are back after the protection was enforced. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Warn and report autoconfirmed users to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW as applicable. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Camilear (talk) 05:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is just making same edits to this page with different IP's, I reverted their unsourced edits, but still that IP user is doing same again and again, you can check the page history. Thank you. Camilear (talk) 05:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is urgent. 174.30.12.241 is clearly watching the page and putting false information as propaganda attempting to influence the vote that’s happening tomorrow. The text of the amendment is in the article and you can clearly see that what they’ve repeatedly put in the heading (that many users other than myself have had to remove multiple times) is a lie. Please help. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 06:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I count about 10 edits in the last week. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That same editor (as it is clearly the same person) has reinstated that same lie within a day of it being removed by three separate editors on three separate occasions. They reinstated it after I removed it *less than half an hour later*, and they will certainly put it up again as soon as they wake up today. And we are talking about misinformation with the potential for extreme consequences here. *Please* get some experienced editors to watch the page in anticipation of that so they can quickly revert it, at least. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you’ll see variations of the same thing being done many, many more times on that article in the short time it’s existed if you look back just a little further. There is not nearly enough attention being paid to it by good editors. 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please, can another editor who doesn’t work for “Campus Crusade for Christ” look at how vulnerable this page is to extremely dangerous misinformation and do something about it? 2600:100A:B1E5:AEBB:24EE:D181:45CF:41D3 (talk) 07:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with my esteemed colleague: the disruptive activity isn't high enough to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
*ahem* I have never been employed by that organization, and my conclusion has absolutely nothing to do with the content of the article nor my personal politics or religion. I find the accusation a bit rude. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 07:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"And we are talking about misinformation with the potential for extreme consequences here." Rest assured that the article in question is getting such low traffic that the potential for "extreme consequences" is virtually nil. Chetsford (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Page history over recent years appears to be almost entirely made up of ECR violations by IPs and registered account as well as edits by multiple socks that have been blocked. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's try this first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – As soon as protection was lifted, anonymous/brand new account original research returned. Can we have it protected longer?. Graywalls (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ada and Abere protected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected and now that its not, the same persistence from IPs adding unsourced programs has returend. Have reverted numerous times with warnings since last protection to no avail. CNMall41 (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has resumed after expiration of previous protection. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recent disruption of this CTOP (WP:CT/AP) - request temporary arbitration enforcement to prevent further disruption/misinformation until after the election (1 week). Raladic (talk) 23:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arab-Israeli Conflict and associated disruptive editing. The topic area has a WP:ECR, so this should be indefinite. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit more tangentally related than I'd like for direct ECP. Let's try a limited duration semi protection and see what happens. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. 2A02:C7C:ACD6:1C00:A595:C942:21E4:DAFE (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by User:Aditya Chonker and multiple IPs. There's no reason to capitalize all the words of a term. Terms should be presented consistently with the title of the article about it. Annh07 (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism . 178.81.55.110 (talk) 10:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit more than 5 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IP socks. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:12, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism when already discussed in Talk page. LMOBX (talk) 23:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Keeps adding random terminating routes that doesn't connect to the source giving.Drcarrot.phd (talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. 180.195.192.0/20 blocked for 2 years. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring. Warnings have been left on their talk page asking them to discuss the matter (and a talk page thread has been open), but they have continued to edit war without bothering with the requests for discussion.

There is more than one IP address being used, but it’s clear they are the same person. Page protection would be appreciated. - SchroCat (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Neither IP has been warned about edit warring or about the underlying conduct/content issue. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Callanecc, yes, they have been warned (although I'm not sure of the use, given they are hopping round IPs). They ignored it and the requests to use the talk page and continued to edit war. How else are we to deal with IP-hopping editor who edit wars and ignores any form of discussion? They haven't vandalised the article, so AIV is entirely the wrong venue, and the peanut gallery at ANI is just a waste of time. Page protection is the only smart move to make. - SchroCat (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SchroCat: User(s) blocked. I'll watchlist the article in case they come back with a different IP. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's great. - SchroCat (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IP user. They keep on changing the link for You Lie (Cee Cee Chapman song) to You Lie (Reba McEntire song) though they have been told that is not the correct link for the song. Multiple times today (November 3) they have changed it to the wrong link. They have done the same thing in the past two days but under another IP number. HappyAppy10 (talk) 01:06, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Under subtitle: Distrubution and habitat. ADD When it comes to their natural habitat, red pandas have a smaller home range of 3.4 km^2, while the giant pandas have a home range of 6.3 km^2. That's about a 30% difference in their ranges. Both species cover 481 meters of daily distances and frequently visit the same bamboo patches, but their activity patterns are different. Red pandas are nocturnal and maintain a consistent activity level throughout the year, but giant pandas have irregular intervals of activity between day and night varying by season. (Johnson, K., & Schaller, G. (1988). pg 552). Hcruz05 (talk) 03:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Talk:Red panda is not protected; please make your request there. Lectonar (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sensitive article about anti-Semitic shooting, How is it possible to leave such this?. 178.81.55.110 (talk) 12:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Because there is very little disruption. I am watching the page, and the last disruptive edit was about 2 months ago. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism resumed after previous protection expired. BrokenSquarePiece (complete me) 16:34, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sandstein. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: It was found. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 17:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 19:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of additions/changes not supported by reliable sources due to recent social media activity ForsythiaJo (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 19:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Removal and addition of important and extraneous information respectively. Delectable1 (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting worse and worse - please protect - Arjayay (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Urgent. Requesting again as it has happened again as I said it would. The misinformation was up for more than two hours this time. I can’t stay on top of it by myself, and I’m sure the traffic to this article will pick up considerably today and tomorrow during the election. 2600:100A:B1C3:831D:2D2E:9BEC:15E8:56D6 (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - The reporter and the IP introducing the content both blocked 24h for edit warring. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized day 0 after protections expired. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2024

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 22:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. AbelAndCain (talk) 19:45, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. GoodnightmushTalk 22:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Controversial figure among astronomers and was recently vandalised (vandalisation was removed) 71.183.74.70 (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Not enough recent disruption. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 22:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 23:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:GS/CASTE Persistent disruptive editin by multiple sock hoppers. ®asteem Talk 20:41, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I would like to request Extended confirmed protection for the The Bloodline article. There are too many accounts making too many changes against Wikipedia's policy and guidelines such as No original research, Fancruft as well as straight up vandalism by editors with no regard or little knowledge of how Wikipedia works and due to the popularity of the article there is simply no way to control it and it is slowly descending into chaos. This is why I request this and I hope this issue can be fixed. Here a few diffs that were previously asked for that can show my point further [4] [5] (Most of this had to be reverted by another editor) [6] These are just a couple of examples but these editors edit the page against the template set out and provide unecessary details and unverified claims and it needs to be put right otherwise it's just going to continue, and just for referencing purposes [7] this is how it should be set out and this was before most of the disruptive editing occured. If you need any more diffs to prove what I'm saying is true or if there is any need for further proof, please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at sanctions page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CTOP/A-I. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism on a contentious page. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 16:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Russian politics IP vandal. Mellk (talk) 12:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Page was protected from October 28 until November 1, but vandalism started again after protection lapsed. David O. Johnson (talk) 13:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Most edits by new editors or IPs need to be reverted (they don't like the section about his presumed homosexuality, which has good sourcing). Has been going on since September, at least 8 reverts so far. Fram (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topics: Arab-Israel conflict. TornadoLGS (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Significa Liberdade. Indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Social media brigading: https://www.instagram.com/susanabulhawa/reel/DByd--hNX2O/ Hypnôs (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Launchballer 22:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also left CTOPS and MOS-NB notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IPs and newly registered users. My Pants Metal (talk) 22:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden wave of IP's trying to vandalize a particular passage of the article. MrOllie (talk) 01:44, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most edits in the last month have been vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Upgrade page move protection to Extended Confirmed. Page was subject to move vandalism and it is unlikely a different title would be valid. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, the current semi protection was obviously insufficient to prevent the latest blanking and page move vandalism, so the page protection should be raised to ECP per WP:AMPOL and logged in the CTOPS logs. Raladic (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. The move protection, at least. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyttend has now move protected the page and added ECP, see his comments at the related AN thread I started to discuss the wider issue of protection for major political candidates - they noted that they haven't previously enacted an ECP, so not sure if it was CTOP logged if you want to help @Daniel Case. Raladic (talk) 04:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even know what CTOP is, let alone what to do with it, so I'd welcome any assistance. If it's only for AMPOL-related arbitration enforcement, it shouldn't be logged; in my protection summary I said May fall under WP:AMPOL too, but this isn't arbitration enforcement; it may be removed by any other administrator. Nyttend (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Let's close this and consider it again next February. It does not need to be logged because WP:CTOP was not claimed. Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing from various IPs continuing after prior protection expired. It seems to be an ongoing series of abuse. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing IP vandalism. Joeyconnick (talk) 04:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is unusual but also disturbing. Johnuniq (talk) 04:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sock fired up less than 24 hours of expiry. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Binksternet (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Very hot-topic article about a squirrel which somehow has become an American political issue. Lots of back and forth edits going on and being reverted, fighting over whether the squirrel was "euthanised" or "murdered", people adding links to the squirrel's owner's onlyfans (which I think must be a new sentence).

As such I think semi-protection till at least a week after the election wojld be best. CoconutOctopus talk 19:13, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. The two editors most visibly arguing about whether euthanasia is a motive or a method are both extended-confirmed; it would take full protection to stop them and, of course, that would stop everyone else and I am loathe to do that with an article about a current contentious news story. But maybe ANEW would see this differently. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Both edit and move protection due to recent disruptive page moving, as well as IP edit-warring from multiple addresses regarding the name of the station. The name of the station is indeed planned to be changed from "Aviation/LAX station" to "Aviation/Imperial station", but this is contingent upon the opening of LAX/Metro Transit Center station a few miles away. There has been some confusion with the station's name as of late, especially with automated train announcements and Metro staff announcing "Aviation/Imperial station" as the name. Thereby, any changes to the name of the station prior to the opening of LAX/Metro Transit Center station, according to the latest source provided, will be sometime next year, are all premature. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The user hasn't edited since they got a warning on their talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism due to being President of Sri Lanka from a third party. - Increase it's protection for semi-protection. DT Truth 🗩talk! 06:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:CT/SL. El_C 09:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent news of possibly unreliable information has surfaced, causing an increase in CTOP WP:GENSEX BLP violations, requiring RD2, request temporary semi of talk page for a few days to hopefully weather over the storm. Raladic (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We tried a few days, now it's time for a few weeks (as so it goes). El_C 09:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 05:40, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Sockpuppetry. Various IP addresses are adding non-notable families hence it needs to be protected. McKhan (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too busy for pc at this time. El_C 09:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request ECP for duration of election days of CTOP WP:AMPOL due to persistent disruption as of the last few hours ago. Raladic (talk) 07:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:AP2 (and as votes are being counted). El_C 09:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent rash of vandalism from multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 08:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by IPs and new editors who want to censor the photo of Bahá’u’lláh (The founder of the Bahá’í Faith), but will not engage in consensus building on the talk page. There has also been an unexplained edit war going on today to remove wikilinks. Request semi-protection for a few weeks or whatever time period admins feel is appropriate, similar to what was done on Bahá’u’lláh a few months ago. —penultimate_supper 🚀 (talkcontribs) 11:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I appreciate it! —penultimate_supper 🚀 (talkcontribs) 15:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Likely to be altered significantly for partisan purposes 2001:8003:EDE3:9700:ACCB:3204:9C9C:4A77 (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already done.: Semi-protected for 6 months. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article should be protected as a preventative measure in this rather contentious and potentially controversial election. ERBuermann (talk) 15:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. The page has been extended confirmed protected since December 2023. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:35, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Low level of id addresses. So add Semi protected for inf GAMERBOY102 (talk) 11:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. GoodnightmushTalk 13:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have the impression that this might have been a protection request for SM Supermalls; @GAMERBOY102: is this what you meant? courtesy @Goodnightmush: Lectonar (talk) 13:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Requesting on behalf of @Shjunpei: (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2024_United_States_presidential_election#%5B%5B23%5D%5D), direct any questions to them. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talkedits) 16:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Renewed persistent vandalism after the last 1-year semi protection expired a few days ago. Requesting indef semi this time. Protection log is a mile long. Raladic (talk) 17:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: His page has had a long history of being vandalized, and now that it's unprotected again, it's still being vandalized. I'm sorry if I seem mad, I'm just genuinely fed up with people vandalizing this poor guy's wiki page. Thank you for understanding. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. A highly contentious BLP within scope of the WP:ARBECR that appears to be being edited mostly by IPs, non-EC accounts and checkuser blocked sockpuppets. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 17:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been repeated instances of IP user (45.128.80.181, 85.203.211.66, 186.127.131.161, 2001:4455:1B1:2800:F880:F193:DDDA:4AF2 etc.) editing original research and destroying accurate corrections. it's probably the same person trolling. みしまるもも (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Violations of WP:NPA on blocked user's talk page. TheWikipede (talk) 19:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed by Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A copious amount of IP vandalism in the past two months. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2024

Reason: High Level of ip vandalism and bad actors ruining our family rep by putting their names. Faizaan.huh (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ymblanter (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – see page history multiple possible sockpuppets keep editing this talk page. Isla🏳️‍⚧ 21:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Diet section, "Pork was noted as a favourite food of the Nair,[78] and even high-status Nairs were noted as eating buffalo meat.[79] The Nair avoided beef, and many did not eat lamb.[80] In the modern day, alcohol is a component of Nair-dominated festivals in Kerala.[79]" These sentences are absolutely controversial, as most of the nairs are vegetarians, and the given statements are baseless. 103.177.252.111 (talk) 12:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you notice the numbers in square brackets above? Each of those is a reference to a source that should corroborate the claim made, and all three of those references are to what appear to be scholarly works (one research paper and two published books). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Malformed request that does not propose any specific change.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Please also do elections prior to 2012. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cullen328. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sockpuppetry, I assume. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sarah McBride just won the congressional seat. We need urgent Talk page protection to protect the talk page from WP:GENSEX BLP violations. Raladic (talk) 04:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - one week CTOP protection on the talk page. There are many reasons that could be given (BLP, GENSEX, AP), so we'll just leave it at CTOP. Risker (talk) 04:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Risker. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued edit warring by multiple proxies. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Novem Linguae. Favonian (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High level of disruption due to edits made outside of consensus. An RfC was held months ago to determine how we should handle the election. It was determined that [t]here is clear consensus to only include a state's projected electoral votes in the infobox once all major media networks unanimously make a projection. Despite both notices on the talk page and article when editing about this consensus, edits are being made when even a single source calls a state, leading to Wikipedia to current be ahead of a number of major sources. Requesting temporary full protection as a result. Super Goku V (talk) 02:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Super Goku V, can you please clarify if this matter is resolved or not? It is nearly impossible to tell from the history. Perhaps doing something simple like creating a table on the talk page with the names of the specific media organizations as well as each state, and posting a link to each organization's call for that state, may help everyone to resolve this situation. I really hesitate to fully protect a page that is reasonably expected to change minute-by-minute. Risker (talk) 02:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The matter is not resolved. We are reporting Harris at 99 EVs while ABC reports 30, CBS reports 30, CNN reports 30, and NBC report 34. I will say that your idea for a table might work better than the discussion so far. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
With the table on the talk page, this issue looks to be resolved. I believe that consensus is being followed and am no longer requesting full protection. Super Goku V (talk) 04:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please also enforce WP:CT/AP among others. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Willing to do that - I'm from another country and have no pony in this race - but it needs to be fairly obvious who is violating it. Risker (talk) 02:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - solution worked out at talk page of article. Will continue to monitor. Risker (talk) 04:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Guess who. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 06:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Protecting a page used by good-faith new editors just plays into this character's hands. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops...in this moement I protected for 18 hours. Edit-conflict. @Extraordinary Writ: do you want me to unprotect? Lectonar (talk) 08:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's fine...I tend to be in the minority on this. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 18 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Essentially for the bot. Lectonar (talk) 10:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biased edits proclaiming Donald Trump as victor in unfinished presidential race. Multiple edits to remove neutrality of inauguration page until victor is declared, resulting in partial edit war. Extremely political and relevant page that should be locked and edited by higher tiered editors to a close degree as the main presidential election page. This page has already given false information to a person uninvolved that Donald Trump has already won the election. CaptainJeida (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of until 1 February 2025, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 09:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ®asteem Talk 00:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – We've had enough. Please, for the love of god salt it. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 06:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition by IP of content contravening WP:NOTNEWS and a refusal to engage in talk page discussion despite being asked to multiple times. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive Edit warring. Am (Ring!) (Notes) 07:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Same offender as the above RFPP/D request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined. Protecting a page used by good-faith new editors just plays into this character's hands. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP address is always vandalising and after I revert edits he will undo it to his edit. IDB.S (talk) 08:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Cabrils (talk) 12:00, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me in creating the page Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc. Thank you. பொதுஉதவி (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you've gone to the wrong place. Do you simply want to create a sandbox for yourself? I'm pretty sure Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc would be a documentation page (something listing technical instructions) for the "பொதுஉதவி" page on a kind of multi-use page called "Module:Sandbox". If you're familiar with all this, and you have good reason for creating a module subpage doc page at this title, please just give confirmation. Nyttend (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyttend: I think they've gone to the right place – edit requests are the way to ask that the title blacklist be overriden, and in this case Module talk:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc matches the same blacklist entry, so the edit request must go here. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized that you might have meant that Module:Sandbox/பொதுஉதவி/doc was the wrong place. Sorry if I misunderstood. Anyway, Module:Sandbox is a "pseudo-namespace", for the reasons described at Module:Sandbox/doc § Scribunto testing area. Module:Sandbox/Jlwoodwa would be my sandbox, and Module:Sandbox/Jlwoodwa/doc is where its documentation would go. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (I just remembered that as a page mover, I can override the title blacklist.) jlwoodwa (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 12:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LaffyTaffer (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - not needed at this time. Anarchyte (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Per the talk page. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - been an hour since the last edit about the result. I will continue to monitor. Anarchyte (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 12:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. Gamebuster (Talk)(Contributions) 13:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals have taken to making many nonsense edits on new accounts to bypass semi-protection. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Snakemaster7114. Kneesalt (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kneesalt: I think that Snakemaster7114 should have been warned for the final time. I have added the requisite number of warnings & this editor can be blocked after the next instance of vandalism or disruptive editing. Peaceray (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was a redirect, and a specific person keeps adding unsourced content, in Bosnian, that appears to either be wholly untrue or which belongs in the article to which this page used to redirect. AriTheHorseTalk to me! 18:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AriTheHorse: If the disruption is from a single editor, then it's better to deal with that editor individually than to protect the page. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 01:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism/unsourced since Oct 11, 2024. Cassiopeia talk 03:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky from Turkey IPs. Binksternet (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GauravKumar11 (talk) 11:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page does not exist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) The page does not exist nor existed. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 11:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – reinstate protection (WP:ARBAP2). Happily888 (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:08, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page is being targetted by WP:LTA/UAK socks and they don't seem to be stopping anytime soon. ZZZ'S 15:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edit without source supporting. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 12:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 15:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: hello There are many people who hate our caste and mislead our caste information. Recently i remove many misleading information about our cast in wikipedia. i would request you to enhance page protection level so people can not Spread hate and put wrong information about our caste. hope you take my request Botox.neet (talk) 14:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Please add sources to the article when inserting new information or use the talk page to discuss changes. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing - this has become something of a political issue and that's bringing a lot of attention to the article. While there is a fair amount of both disruptive edits and good faith disagreement among registered users that is resulting in frequent changes to the article, I'm hoping that semi-protected status will help lower the amount of disruptive edits we need to keep up with. Cheers, Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 04:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The IPs' edits seem on par with the autoconfirmed editors' (some bits of content are being edit-warred, with some accounts add the same things the IPs add, and as filer notes the autoconfirmed editors are making high levels of disputed changes as well). So SEMI is not going to help substantially or be a fair solution. There are reasonable edit-summaries and general civility, so I'm holding off with FULL for now. Talkpage is active. DMacks (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A non-small-IP-range and several other IPs repeatedly adding non-MEDRS-supported content and now also abusive edit-summaries. DMacks (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP Hoben7599 (talk) 10:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely under WP:GS/RUSUKR. SilverLocust 💬 20:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. C F A 💬 15:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I would be loath to protect a draft, tbh, but the draft as it is might well qualify for a G11 speedy deletion......"bringing together together all the initiatives in favor of..." alone rings some bells. Lectonar (talk) 15:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of drafts created by McSyl that keep being resubmitted by IP socks. I get one every 5 or so random drafts. They're just wasting reviewer time. I could take them to MFD, but I think semi-protection until their timers expire would be easier. C F A 💬 16:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @CFA: Given the clear sockpuppetry, I think protecting for several months is reasonable, but the article needs to be deleted via MFD rather trying to delete it through some sort of backdoor method. @Lectonar: Please let me know if you have any concerns. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock and proxy edit warring issues. Grayfell (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Thank you Cyberbot I. Yaris678 (talk) 21:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm (💬pros · 📜cons) 21:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2024

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP accounts annoyed that they've been blocked from editing the associated article are now filling up the talk page with claims of censorship. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:20, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism by rotating IPs. Anwegmann (talk) 19:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: People are unhappy with the results of the US presidential election. I imagine more vandalism is coming with regard to the edit I just reverted. I recommend semi-protecting this page as a precaution. Simplediscipline (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This may not be necessary in retrospect, but I figured I'd put the request in anyway. Deny if not applicable/required by situation. Simplediscipline (talk) 13:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Things seem to have calmed down there so I'm going to decline this for now, but please feel free to resubmit if the level of disruption becomes more significant. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Removing section on controversies, likely COI or self editing. Aydoh8[contribs] 23:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect: The talk page was recently semi-protected due to unregistered users using the talk page as WP:FORUM on Mohammed Deif's death. At the time, his death was in dispute. Now that his death is no longer in dispute, and the article shows him as dead, I don't think the talk page needs to be semi-protected any more. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 05:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Any thougths on that request? Lectonar (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: the death is still in dispute. Hamas has disputed the report that it has acknowledged the death. For now, it seems that the consensus is to have the article show that he is dead, and note the dispute. Since the WP:FORUM comments were from the side that wanted to have the article show Deif as dead, I don't expect this activity to resume. I also don't expect it to now come from the other side.
Please note that semi-protecting the talk page means that non-confirmed editors cannot make edit requests. This means that protection on talk pages should be applied only under the most extreme circumstances. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So do we want to lift the protection or not? Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think for a talk page, it's been protected for too long. Unprotect and see how it goes. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Daniel Case (talk) 23:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Took almost 2 months to detect it (see history), I've reverted it now TheWikipede (talk) 17:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheWikipede The only vandalism that I see was reverted within 7 minutes, not two months. Other than that one flurry of activity, it doesn't look like persistent vandalism. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 23:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The page needs protection to stop any censorship attempts. Kalbome22 (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It doesn't look like that's overwhelmed the page yet. Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalisms and unreliable edits from new user. Arbitorya (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection not necessary, this is an edit war between just two users, both of whom have violated 3RR. Therefore:
User(s) blocked: Fahadotaibi (talk · contribs).
User(s) blocked: Arbitorya (talk · contribs).
Each for 24 hours. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 23:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 01:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – would also be ok with pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA back immediately after protection expired. A longer one is needed this time. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 01:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: protecting this page is a last resort, and there haven't been any problems in the last hour. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also CT. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Historically bouncing IPs and a few COI accounts have been deleting facts that have supporting citations, all are related to the building once being a plantation and being involved with slavery. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 01:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aoidh there are four edits that qualify as vandalism in the last few days, from two bouncing IPs. How much more frequent are you expecting for temp. semi protection? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 02:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PigeonChickenFish: Given that three of the edits were by the same editor in six minutes, it's more like two sets of edits. And then you need to go all of the way back to 30 August 2023 before there's another reverted edit. I agree it's not quite at the point where protection makes sense. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry has likely resumed from an indefinitely blocked user who stubbornly continues with unwarranted suffix removals. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection was applied almost 14 years ago, vandals would have now long gone. Protecting admin is not active hence this request. LibStar (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. It looks like the page was pretty badly disrupted before so let's try pending changes for a while first. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Page Protection: Requesting temporary page protection due to repeated edit warring by users @Osasnova, @OmoIyaLeke and others. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 12:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:15, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it is not vandalized and was not being vandalized by unregistered users, I don't think the protection was necessary and should be lowered to either semi-protected or unprotected. ミラへぜ (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ミラへぜ: The reason given for protection was Arbitration enforcement, most likely India-Pakistan. While this protection is over a year old at this point, you should have asked Courcelles (talk · contribs) if they'd be willing to unprotect first. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't object to lowering it to semiprotection. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will note that at least one autoconfirmed user seems to have been involved and that user was subsequently blocked for sockpuppetry, but I agree that semi-protection is worth trying. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:25, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. @ミラへぜ: Please ask Courcelles on their user talk page as per WP:UNPROTPOL. If they don't respond within several days, you can resubmit this request here. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I need to continue my next task Kim Yi Yu Zhou (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. The draft does not look like it is ready to be moved into main space yet. I recommend finishing the draft first. When it's ready, you can submit it through the WP:AFC process. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: hello recently i edited this page some admistrator reverted my edit.. i provide all sources and refrences request you inhance page proctection Botox.neet (talk) 09:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Substantive edits need to be reliably sourced, or they will not stand. Lectonar (talk) 09:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued disruption from disconnected IP addresses, requesting temporary protection. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 11:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from IPs and new users. My Pants Metal (talk) 13:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Thank you Cyberbot I. Yaris678 (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A relative new ID and and IP (possibly the same person) have been changing the sourced DoB of the subject [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]. The user claims that they know the subject personally [15]. They made similar claims for other actors [16] [17] as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Fylindfotberserk: In the future, please try to leave user talk page warnings for stuff like this. I went ahead and did that although this seems close to the point where it should be reported to WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of "saving humanity" nonsense over the past couple of days. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. As the film is set for release next week, vandalism is expected to increase. Requesting semi-protection for at least a month. (Vax'ildan Vessar (talk) 14:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated BLP violations by IP editors. – Recoil16 (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Vandalism and BLP violations after six previous protections. – Recoil16 (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Indefinite semi or ECP please. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page has been recreated once. Added to my watchlist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 15:35, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopper keeps adding death claim with no sourcing. – The Grid (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:05, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and new accoutns making tests/vandalizing the page. Maybe slightly longer protection, a couple months?. Paris1127 (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Seems to be related to current events in the US which have highlighted the article on twitter, similar to prior issues with the 4B movement article. Requesting temporary protection. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 18:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 178.121.30.101 (talk · contribs) blocked by Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 19:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three edits in one day isn't what I would call a "high level," and before that there weren't any edits at all for a month. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, edit conflict, but the IPs are likely proxies and definitely block evasion by an LTA. Favonian (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the information contained in the article is not valid and edited for the benefit of Russian propaganda. Because of protection, it is not possible to change the information and people are reading Russian propaganda, which does not coincide with historical facts and events.Erufu0 (talk) 16:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected Please contact the protecting admin first.RegentsPark (comment) 16:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by ip editors. Yuthoob (talk) 18:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Incessant unsourced edits from mobile IP users DukeOfDelTaco (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA target. Leonidlednev (TCL) 21:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

08 November 2024

Reason: IP addresses create page for no reason, and they get removed for Vandalism. Requesting Semi-protection. SuperJames888 (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ad Orientem (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page gets created, even though it should never be created. Should be blocked from IP addresses creating it. Requesting Semi-Protection. SuperJames888 (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ad Orientem (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Izno protected the article due to socking until November 6th. After the protection expired, an IP made the same edit as the blocked IP. S0091 (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want this protection to be INDEFINITE 2600:100C:B0A1:E6C9:30F2:28B0:B67B:C73B (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry immediately resumed after unprotection. 2600:100C:B0A1:E6C9:30F2:28B0:B67B:C73B (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism/irrational editing by extended-confirmed editors Cessaune [talk] 20:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute, must be resolved at the talk page or otherwise prevented by blocks. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If any editors are edit warring, please make a report with specifics to WP:ANEW. Obvious vandalism should be reported to WP:AIV. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – disruptive IP editors- a week page protection would be helpful. ScienceFlyer (talk) 22:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations have resumed since expiry of previous protection. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Recreation of the page from the redirect; should be salted. This page being recreated is a WP:CFORK of List of 2025 Indian Premier League personnel changes. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I've left a note on the user's talk page asking them not to recreate the page w/o first gaining consensus. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP is repeatedly making edits so that the descriptions no longer match the sources. A google search does not bring up any info to corroborate their edits, so it appears to be their own interpretation. Betty Logan (talk) 01:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection: Constant IP vandalism on page, either making irrelevant comments or adding false uncited information. Rynoip (talk) 01:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. And quite related to the recently concluded election. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 00:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @2601AC47: I don't think ECP is necessary right now, but a longer duration may be necessary. Please feel free to submit a new request if disruption resumes. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I have no objection to a longer duration, especially if logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP, if you want to go with a longer duration. As you might infer from my above comment, I'm not entirely certain 3 days will be sufficient, but it went almost a month between October and November without disruption. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it is after the election now ... I had actually thought of declining. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Increasing amounts of vandalism, likely more to come over time due to the subject. TopVat19sEver (talk) 00:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it seems edit-warring is occurring. TopVat19sEver (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let's see if a week gets us past the worst of it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent, long-term IP vandalism. The IP changes from entry to entry, so it’s impossible to discuss with the offender. Drmargi (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per: WP:ARBPIA, same topic article already protected: November 2024 Amsterdam attacks. GrabUp - Talk 07:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:07, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP vandalism changing and removing film boxoffice and budget numbers. Some IPs are also changing film's director's name. The vandalism is very high on this page and a long time page protection will help. RangersRus (talk) 09:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:11, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous disruptive editing by IP users. As soon as the protection for this page was removed, there have been numerous disruptive edits by IP users that undermine the credibility of information on this page. Continuous change of box office numbers without providing reliable sources despite warnings. Need protection for a longer period on this one. Sneshik (talk) 06:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by several IPs. Likely same person. Ongoing for several months. Adakiko (talk) 07:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. With zero protection history, I'm not inclined to semi-protect for long. Please re-apply here or contact me directly if we need to renew this or gradually lengthen protection period. Let us know if this recurs again. BusterD (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and addition of unsourced edits by numerous IP users. Suggest to keep article protected until February 2025, when the season begins. Areaseven (talk) 08:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP of blocked editor continuing to add vandalism. List of CNN personnel has already been protected, so disruption has moved to Template:CNN and Template:CNN personnel. Requesting short term protection for both. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 11:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since mid October this page has been target of petty vandalism. Not sure why. Newly created accounts that haven't edited since and different IPs. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. With no protection history, I'm not yet inclined to a long period of protection. Please help us by reporting further disruption at this namespace. BusterD (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – More box office edit warriors. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 14:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of manipulation on this page . IndianDocumentaryTV (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please protect the page , because the edit made recently are from relevant sources that can be seen in the references tab in the page . IndianDocumentaryTV (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And this page is constantly been edited , with not enough references... IndianDocumentaryTV (talk) 11:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should discuss the information you want to add to the article at the talk page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of IP vandalism over prior months, needs semi-protection. Mb2437 (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not sure what's going on here, but different IPs and newly created accounts have been going at it here. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Predictable post election wave of disruptive talkpage posts. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:12, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. This seems to have calmed down a bit since the report. Of course we were going to see lots of traffic; this is the talk page of the president elect. I'm seeing many IP contributions today which seem to be good faith edits. Any even temporary protection of this discussion page will have the effect of appearing to shut out good faith disagreement. I'm sympathetic to page watchers, but IMHO we need to weather this moment by allowing people to make good faith comments on talk, even if those edits seem to some repetitive and annoying. BusterD (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the last week or so, repeated addition of intentional factual errors. RachelTensions (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. King V154R (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Discuss the content dispute on the talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing on a CTOPS page. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Impressed that it went this long without needing protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:25, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism has resumed in the wake of the Peanut affair. Longer protection than has been previously imposed is needed. Not doing it myself because I have had so much to do with that article in the past Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – I wish to protect my page due to its contents. •Cyberwolf•talk? 18:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. This is a regular admin action, you're allowed to request protection of your own user page, regardless of what's on it. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disrupting [18] and [19] by 86.5.57.248. AsteriodX (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued BLP policy violations requiring RD2 revdel on WP:GENSEX Arbitration page. Requesting indef semi for Talk page under Arbitration enforcement for CTOP. Raladic (talk) 19:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We rarely protect talk pages indefintely, and to me it hasn't gotten there yet. Daniel Case (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lot of back and forth regarding country of origin. Let it first play out in Talk. Sir Tragedy (talk) 19:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Using the talk page sounds good. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant influx ip editors changing things about the November 2024 Amsterdam attacks Wiiformii (talk) 19:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Evident LOUTSOCKing of IPs continuing to add content contrary to TVCAST since last page protection expired in October. Various warnings without engaging in discussion and edit warring. CNMall41 (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Arbitration enforcement, content on the page is covered by WP:PIA but is being extensively edited by non-ec users. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - the scope of PIA is the conflict between Israelis and Arabs. Hooliganism in Holland is far outside that scope. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivanvector I don't see how this could be outside the scope of these sanctions. The event that started this was Palestinian flags being torn down, almost all the "background" section of November 2024 Amsterdam attacks concerns the recent conflict and related protests, and that article has already been protected as an enforcement action. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have become quite definitely WP:INVOLVED here, someone else can review whether or not this should be protected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Pickersgill-Cunliffe. BusterD (talk) 20:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone trying to insert a non-notable "notable" event. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:58, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Peaceray (talk) 19:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09 November 2024

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors have disruptively edited the Todd Cantwell page, causing BLP issues and vandalism. Kolano123 (talk) 00:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many of past edits were vandalism, two page wipe attempts today, also a section blanking attempt(not today) Wildfireupdateman (talk) 01:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Seedy bah (talk · contribs) blocked by Discospinster. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Yesnoplsnoyesnoplsno (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Peaceray (talk) 23:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Request WP:SILVER due to the repeated addition of unsourced BLP content by IP accounts. This originally was originally created by the subject of the article (Cmanon), and they've continued to add unsupported BLP content to it over the years. They were advised several times not to do this, but continued and were eventually blocked. They've also seem to have been using IP accounts over the years to do the same thing. The IPs have been advised not to do this, but they too have persisted. The article subject is of questionable Wikipedia notability, but attempts are being made at WP:BEFORE. I'm requesting this article be protected to at least stop the IPs from continuing to re-add unsupported content while the attempts made to find better sources continues. PP seems to be more reasonable alternative to blocking the IP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Marchjuly: Just to save you some future effort, sometimes we'll ask for diffs or more information if the disruption isn't obvious, but we generally don't need that much detail for a common issue, links to lock color shortcuts almost nobody uses, etc. The first half of your request would be more than sufficient. But thanks for the detailed explanation! Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content and vandalism by IP users. Soapwort (talk) 03:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unknown users (three different IP addresses) continually remove citations in the lede. There is no explanation in the edits and they have not responded on the talk page. Irregulargalaxies (talk) 03:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Irregulargalaxies: The article talk page discussion is good, but I think we need a bit more effort to communicate with the other editor on their user talk page and in edit summaries before resorting to protection. (It might make sense to move the citation and Grammy details into a career section at some point and go with a shorter version without a citation in the lead, but I'll leave that to you.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:02, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing this. I agree that the article can be restructured better (still including the citation), but wanted the current addition to be stable before investing any effort into cleaning up the rest of the article. I added requests for explanations to each of the user talk pages, although all of them are non-logged in users and have only this single edit in their histories. If there is no response there and if it occurs more than a few times, I'll likely ask again for page protection. Irregulargalaxies (talk) 17:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
04:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 07:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Recent incident where Cox was caught on livestream for pedophilia prompted flood of edits, many of which were disruptive and potential BLP violations. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 05:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations related to the recent US presidential election. Aoi (青い) (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 103.240.96.250 (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection - recurrent highly defamatory vandalism/BLP violations. Wellington Bay (talk) 05:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Risker. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism ([20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] (several edits on this page from this user), [27]) these are only the past 50 edits. far too much vandalism on this page calls for semi-protection (or at least pending changes protection) 750h+ 09:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request indefinite semi-protection, IP users making unsourced and disruptive changes to the article. [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] If any other proof is required, please let me know in the reply. Lemonademan22 (talk) 13:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No previous protection history. Please come back if this recurs. BusterD (talk) 14:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement per WP:ECR. Left guide (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism happened yesterday by users who try to just vandalism with the page with no references and sources 2.49.42.105 (talk) 03:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 12:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the word 'box-office flop' to word 'Box-office hit' Vprmcmxcii (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite semi-protection IP users making disruptive edits. [33] [34] [35] [36] If any more proof is needed, please let me know in the reply below. Lemonademan22 (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In this case the AfD looks like it's going to be a snow keep. So I am protecting for the duration. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism since 13:37, 30 October 2024, adding the same unsourced commentary each time. Alith Anar 14:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous users added films that Universal Pictures did not acquire or announce, including Everything I Never Did, which does not have a distributor yet. The Media Expert (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper has repeatedly vandalized Nashville, Tennessee by changing the mayor's name from Freddie O'Connell to Leon Draisaitl, a player for the Edmonton Oilers. This has been happening since at least November 2, 2022, so can somebody give Nashville semi-protection? King airaglub (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Chanaka L (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Problems restarted after a year's semi-protection and virtually all edits from IPs and new accounts since then have not been constructive. Protection log shows issues going back years - perhaps a case for long-term pending changes? Entranced98 (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Since all the previous protections have been semi. Based on what you say PC would likely just create a lot of unnecessary work for the regular editors on the article. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism, removal of sourced content and claim of "good faith". Seems to be done by a same person using diff ipsSeyamar💬📜 19:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Poor administration Billygoats1234 (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NB: this page was protected in response to this user's editing and a possible undeclared COI. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article contains faulty information! 2601:589:5080:9AC:99C0:C547:6D0F:65E5 (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article (November 2024 Amsterdam attacks) is protected under WP:ARBPIA. Please make an edit request if you wish content to be changed. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – There has been discussion on the status of Rajputs which is affecting related pages and this page is one such page. So, to avoid edit warring by EC accounts, full protection is needed. Adamantine123 (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Discussion between the warring editors has started on the talk page and they are laying off the article for now, it seems. Like other admins here I am loathe to full-protect any page already under a long-term protection (although I have done it) since MediaWiki currently does not allow us to layer protection levels (other than PC) over different durations, so when a full protection expires this article (which as a CASTE article that has already been under indef ECP following past disruption) would be left unprotected. Yes, I do have W-Ping so I would be reminded, but that depends on me being in a position to get back and reprotect the article promptly. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has been subject to persistent vandalism and edit wars, disrupting its credibility and integrity. Over the past few weeks, there have been multiple instances of users making inaccurate or biased edits, often with the intent to mislead or promote specific agendas. These edits have included the addition of false information, removal of cited content, and insertion of defamatory or promotional material.

Despite reverting these changes and issuing warnings to the involved editors, the behavior has continued, often from anonymous IP addresses or newly created accounts. This persistent activity negatively impacts the reliability of the article and misleads readers.

Additionally, the topic of the page has garnered significant public attention recently, making it a target for repeated edits driven by media narratives, personal biases, or coordinated efforts to skew public perception. Given the high traffic to this page and the recurring nature of these disruptions, semi-protection or full protection is necessary to ensure only constructive, verified contributions are made.

Protecting this page will:

Prevent further disruption and maintain the accuracy of the content. Allow editors to focus on improving the article rather than reverting repeated vandalism. Uphold Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and reliability. Given these challenges, I request that the page be protected for a specified period to mitigate ongoing issues and provide a stable version for readers. Sohailnm (talk) 17:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, I would note that you have very few edits in total for an account created two years before you even began editing, and most of these have been to this article, which is tagged as having UPE issues. AGF notwithstanding, I cannot clear my mind of suspicions that that tag might be prompted by concerns about your editing (I will, however, put a CTOPS notice on the talk page). Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter I think you set the page protection to two days instead of two weeks by accident, though the page was move protected for two weeks. Just letting you know. Fathoms Below (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you are right, thanks for noticing. Corrected now. Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bot was not working for two months because an IP set it to "stop" and no one noticed. C F A 💬 22:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2024

Reason: High Level of Vandalism 2.49.42.105 (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism 2.49.42.105 (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This topic widely cover the frontline of religious institutes WP:IF and spiritually and usefully pose an verbal important for thousands of daily viewers so its generically an common instance to increase the protection of this sensitive topic at least to extend confirm user right coverage to prevent anonymous intervention from overall contributor's 113.177.117.19 (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If significant disruption occurs then feel free to re-request protection here. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additionally unsourced or poorly sourced content 2605:59C8:93:E810:D9A3:FA55:1A8:DFAF (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing by new user. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amaury22:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additionally unsourced or poorly sourced 2605:59C8:93:E810:4DCE:7C1D:7D62:1C87 (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 00:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @EndzoneEnthusiast: There is a lot that is far than ideal here. Edits are being reverted without any explanation. And if there are disruptive edits, then there should be some meaningful user talk page warnings explaining our guidelines and standards, and I don't see any recent warnings. Finally, the recent history is almost entirely bereft of meaningful edit summaries. Please start using edit summaries and leaving warnings when necessary. If the disruption continues in a significant way, we can reconsider page protection at a later time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article keeps getting targeted by IP caste-warriors. Was protected in the past and disruption resumed shortly after its protection expired. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 00:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Unregistered users are wreaking havoc on this page by adding unrelated images, ungrammatical sentences, and edit warring. Generally, all cities have a minimum of pending or semi-protection so the same is required here too. 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝟐𝟎𝟒𝟖 00:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. At least, this needs to be logged as CTOP for post-1992 US politics and permanent ECP. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Edit war seems to have stopped. Will keep an eye on the article. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The blocked user Havaa Fitzgerald is back vandalising Template:CNN and Template:CNN personnel. They just keep switching IP, so I'm requesting temporary protection for both. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 01:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both Template:CNN and Template:CNN personnel. Peaceray (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Numerous IP addresses (which probably are all the same person) have maliciously changed the founding year from 1947 to 1964 since October 19, 2024. In addition to the usual warnings in the talk pages of the IPs (some of which have been blocked), the vandalism can easily be recognized by the incoherence of the History section which claims the company was founded in "1964" and then goes on talking about events from the 1950s in the sentences after it. 76.65.74.178 (talk) 01:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Vandalism immediately after previous semi-expired. seems to have some useful contributions from non autoconfirmed editors Justiyaya 02:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fathoms Below (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Long-term disruption. Anopisthograph (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing and a extremely contentious topic. Multiple sockpuppets have been adding untrue information and violating BLP policy violations for months now. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43]. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 08:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Problem editor has been blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Bertrand101 Sock. Gunther :  Talk  09:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same LTA as before (previous request got voided). Aidan9382 (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A permanent extended-confirmed protection is complete overkill, autoconfirmed should be enough, this article barely gets edited anymore--FMSky (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It's not overkill if the disruption was coming from auto-confirmed accounts, which it was in this case per the protection log.-- Ponyobons mots 18:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. The current protection level seems reasonable and appropriate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has multiple errors that are not being updated despite users' intimations on the talk page. It's been under extended protection for a long time despite not being a high-risk template. Almost all cities' pages are only semi-protected so decreasing the protection should be considered. 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝟐𝟎𝟒𝟖 00:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. @Wallflower2048: Hi Wallflower2048. Thanks for making a request. You need to ask El C on their user talk page since they protected the article (see WP:UNPROTPOL for more information). If El C does not reply then you can make a new request. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That page has seen unrelenting spam and been semiprotected 15 times prior, but even that wasn't enough. Still, I'm willing to downgrade to test the waters, even though my confidence of it being enough is low. But that was 2019, so sure why not.  Done. El_C 00:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Global NN Group Sdn Bhd GlobalNNGroup (talk) 11:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The requesting user has been blocked for spam

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP addresses since 19:47, 17 October 2024. Alith Anar 16:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fathoms Below (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Poor quality edits from new users and anonymous users, not aligning with sources and original research on controversial claims. Serious contention on talk page. seefooddiet (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 18:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to write more about this article from various sources on internet so kindly unprotect this page. 103.170.179.25 (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Socks need not apply. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2024

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 14 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also noting that it was previously protected for a similar length of time for the same reason - If disruptive editing continues after this period we may need a more long-term solution. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 02:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Ongoing disruption from various IP editors. A couple of said editors have already been blocked: 2605:A601:A602:E00:415B:D6DE:B0CF:70D9 (talk · contribs) 136.56.188.242 (talk · contribs), so it may be preferable to block the remainder. Barry Wom (talk) 13:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Wave of disruptive edits from IPs and new accounts. MrOllie (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction per WP:ARBPIA4. There's a talk page notice confirming this, but the main page has no protection. — xDanielx T/C\R 23:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sirocco745 (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A very brief protection period might deter this vandalism. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A permanent extended-confirmed protection is complete overkill, autoconfirmed should be enough, this article barely gets edited anymore--FMSky (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: It's not overkill if the disruption was coming from auto-confirmed accounts, which it was in this case per the protection log.-- Ponyobons mots 18:14, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. The current protection level seems reasonable and appropriate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has multiple errors that are not being updated despite users' intimations on the talk page. It's been under extended protection for a long time despite not being a high-risk template. Almost all cities' pages are only semi-protected so decreasing the protection should be considered. 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝟐𝟎𝟒𝟖 00:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. @Wallflower2048: Hi Wallflower2048. Thanks for making a request. You need to ask El C on their user talk page since they protected the article (see WP:UNPROTPOL for more information). If El C does not reply then you can make a new request. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That page has seen unrelenting spam and been semiprotected 15 times prior, but even that wasn't enough. Still, I'm willing to downgrade to test the waters, even though my confidence of it being enough is low. But that was 2019, so sure why not.  Done. El_C 00:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No longer needed after 14 years of semi-protection. 103.83.198.169 (talk) 07:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 02:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change
| image = [[File:Wikimedia-logo black.svg|40px|link=|alt=]]
to
| image = [[File:Wikimedia-logo black.svg|40px|link=|alt=|class=skin-invert]]
for dark mode compatibility —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? - uselessc} 16:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I really don't think any admins should be editing a page currently protected under an office action. Best to just wait until the protection is reduced or removed first. The page doesn't really need compatibility with dark mode right now since there isn't much to look at either. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs disrupting a WP:CASTE sanctioned page. Likely socking (e.g. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror). Asking for a temp protection (appears to be a recent campaign). Gotitbro (talk) 14:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at WP:GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-disruption late October - November. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to write more about this article from various sources on internet so kindly unprotect this page. 103.170.179.25 (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because there is nothing to do. Page is not protected, requester failed to read instructions, and is now blocked anyway. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase in vandalism Iandaandi (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of vandalism Darkwebhistory (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism immediately resumed after the protection expired. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Doxxing and vandalism at a high level. Oversight must help stop the doxxing. I request full protection to keep people safe. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also emailed Oversight about this but as a precaution I've protected this page for one day until they can handle it. Thanks for letting someone know about this, in the future if you discover an issue like this WP:RFO is the correct place to go. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. They've been emailed about it. Sadly an incident offline has already occurred due to the doxxing. But yes thanks again for protecting the page. OldDiddlyBop (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Edit warring and disruptive editing. Coster85 (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 02:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of Two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:41, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial topic currently on the main page in the WP:ITN section. Killarnee (talk) 03:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP ECP Hoben7599 (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at WP:RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:22, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, ongoing predominate disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 20:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not much reverting recently. Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 02:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The latest IP address has been blocked for 48 hours, but if there is a pick up in vandalism please ping me. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeatedly recreated by socks and IP users. Relevant convos: ANI, Previous deletions, COIN, Talkpage discussion and Sockpupetry IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Daniel Case. Could I just ask a question? I was under the impression that the article had been salted back in August, so I'm puzzled as to how it was created again in September. Any clarification here would be appreciated. Also, is it the creation of the draft that has been prevented, or the movement of the draft into mainspace? Many thanks, Axad12 (talk) 07:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The mainspace page was salted. I just took care of the draftspace page. With both of them now protected the question of moving it is moot. Daniel Case (talk) 07:02, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for clarification. That's great. Axad12 (talk) 07:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP ECP Hoben7599 (talk) 06:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log as well. Daniel Case (talk) 06:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing and vandalism by IPs over the last few weeks. -TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 04:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 06:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting white-lock protection due to vandalism caused by IP address-identified editors that attempt to violate the privacy of the subject of the article in question. 96.235.164.171 (talk) 04:40, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much reverting in the history. Daniel Case (talk) 06:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcementWP:A/I/PIA. Most edits appear to be by IPs, non-EC accounts and multiple blocked socks. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent socking to vandalize (possibly by more than one person?): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5](today). Other vandalism also happened. – 143.208.239.58 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Fair bit of vandalism to this page recently by different accounts. OXYLYPSE (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/edit warring by different IPs Cinderella157 (talk) 09:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 13:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a strange claim that the 6B4T movement was created and developed in China. I made corrections to this, but some users have continuously reverted the page. Please protect the page until the discussion is concluded. Gunyang (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be protected, but not on your version, which likely used ChatGPT and contains very few sources. seefooddiet (talk) 10:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism and potential edit waring by wikipedia users ( Mb2437 ) 128.243.2.19 (talk) 12:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please use the talk page to discuss changes to the article. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
you have saved the page with the wrong edit, please revert to the one posted at --:14 today, and then protect it from impartial editors such as Mb2437 128.243.2.19 (talk) 12:29, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP on BLP Headless horseman 404 (talk) 13:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Doesn't seem like there's any need to go above indefinite semi-protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement per WP:ECR. Left guide (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:02, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip and account vandalism, Violation of BLP. Knitsey (talk) 14:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Hey man im josh. Favonian (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the misspelled word 'Healtcare' to 'Healthcare' in the Healthcare issues section below Campaign issues. ThrowawayB4NND1T (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thanks! Favonian (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:08, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Rht bd (talk) 08:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But feel free to re-report if it gets any worse. GoodnightmushTalk 13:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP ECP Hoben7599 (talk) 12:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by newly registered users. the article is already on the WP:ITN MSLQr (talk) 12:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: CTOP ECP Hoben7599 (talk) 13:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High-traffic article prone to IP vandalism Headless horseman 404 (talk) 13:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 13:46, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Flurry of changes from IP editors quoting reddit posts. OXYLYPSE (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Looks like all the disruption has been carried out by IPs. Favonian (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High IP activity of the user who incorrectly quotes the text in the article Dushnilkin (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done What "incorrect quote" are you referring to? The IP activity I see is removing "exaggerated" notes; does the given source say they are exaggerated? OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Niasoh (talk) 14:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Joyous!. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But I guess sockpuppets are now editing with multiple accounts with autoconfirmed access. @Favonian. Niasoh (talk) 18:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Introduction of CV content by anonymous editors. WP:CT/EE might also apply here, but it's tenuous. Signed, Guessitsavis (she/they) Talk 17:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by ip. Blackknight12 (talk) 14:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User Yngvadottir started an editorial war by failing to cite relevant wiki-policies to justify her deletions. Walter Tau (talk) 16:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Accusing Yngvadottir of edit warring seems a bit like the pot calling the kettle black. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely Fathoms Below (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on numerous IPs removing sourced information, the subject's pronouns. CommissarDoggoTalk? 15:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
RevDel'ed edits appropriately going back several years. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Only edits for the last month have been joke edits and reversion of said edits. LaffyTaffer (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Page under constant vandalism when unprotected, since Fall 2021. CesarMcIntosh (talk) 17:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 132.204.240.0/22 (talk · contribs). One-year partial block from the article in question. The last attack was nearly three weeks ago, so protection doesn't appear necessary at present. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the exact same case as before. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being vandalized right after protections expired today. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism over last two days from multiple IP editors. Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-frequently vandalised by IP and non-IP users who try to add "Patrick Doran" as one of the writers. First vandalised by "Patrick Doran" himself, see here on Twitter - [44] now periodically is vandalised by his followers/lackies/people trying to be funny etc. Have reverted this edit 4 times this year - article gets little edit activity otherwise ToeSchmoker (talk) 21:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2024

Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Good reason to think that her appointment for UN ambassador will be contentious and fall under WP:CT/AP. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 14:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's so far been only that outburst this morning which led to RevDel'ing. Other than that, this is basically a request for pre-emptive protection which we rarely grant outside of ARBPIA. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion of IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of the current article protection, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Rash of vandalism by IPs and new accounts since becoming an Adviser to the Interim government of Bangladesh, yesterday - Arjayay (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think sockpuppets involved in this Niasoh (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Joyous!. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP has been altering birth/death dates without providing a source. PetraMagna (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request extended confirmed. Slow-moving edit war with anonymous and new editors fighting over correct description. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for one month. Noting restriction in CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Earlier today there were two misguided attempts by an extended-confirmed user to execute a cut/paste move of the article to Islamic State (organisation). Move protection cannot guard against that, and as far as I can tell, there has never been any attempts to move the article disruptively. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, it's been fully move-protected (administrators only) for years now. This may be a misguided request to reduce protection, since the request was moved here by Favonian from WP:RFPP/D. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: BLP policy violations. Rht bd (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would also be ok with pending changes as well. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – My talk page is being lit up like a pinball machine by block-evading ips protesting the removal of EC from a LTA sock. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. benǝʇᴉɯ 23:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry target since 22:30, 26 January 2024. Alith Anar 23:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:42, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps changing the subject's father's WP:COMMONNAME (Bal Thackeray to Balasaheb Thackeray) as well as the subject's sourced fullname, and edit wars about it even after being explained and warned [45] [46] [47] [48]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But feel free to re-report if it gets worse. GoodnightmushTalk 21:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – rapid IP disruption. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 00:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Techdelixir (talk) 16:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unexplained changes made by several IPs. CycloneYoris talk! 22:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism committed by multiple IP addresses by changing the redirect target to random pages. ZZZ'S 23:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: High level of edit warring. Coster85 (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the talk page discussions seem not to be increasing mutual understanding, I'm not optimistic that forcing the two primary combatants there would make much difference to the situation. Perhaps something like 1RR, although I'm not sure how we could impose it under the present structure, would work better. Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don’t think 1RR would work in that situation. Maybe the locking of the page will force the parties to discuss.Coster85 (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This request may be unnecessary now given that 72.36.119.94 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) has been globally blocked for one week. If edit warring resumes, please submit a new request. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: More IP vandalism; at least semi is needed.--Coster85 (talk) 02:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page has been over-run with disruptive editing by anonymous editors, and the disruption continues to happen, even after page is updated to meet MOS standards. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stated Israeli tank losses in casualty and losses infobox are incorrect, attributed article from Business Insider states "The IDF again had problems with anti-tank missiles during the 2006 war in Lebanon, when Hezbollah employed Russian-made Kornets. Though about 50 Merkavas were damaged, only five were destroyed, according to the IDF, which also struggled with poorly maintained vehicles and ill-trained crews." Casualties and losses box states this number as if it was from current conflict. Article does, however, state that "Israel has lost nearly two dozen tanks during fighting with Hamas since October 7." I believe losses of tanks in the infobox should be fixed to reflect this. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done tank casualties do not appear in the infobox unless I've completely missed something. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like the losses were removed entirely from the info box at some point. Unsure when, but it did include stated loss claims when I made this request. Thanks for checking on it though. 155.225.2.98 (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Multiple times vandalism and unsourced changes by newly registered editors. See:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The article is already on the WP:ITN. MSLQr (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism as related to the election. Recommend protection; temporarily. Dillard421♂♂ (talk to me) 02:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – May want to look at Andrew Ference and Mark Teixeira too. Often this LTA just makes a few childish edits and moves on, but tonight is one of those nights where he’s going to need help to stop. Larry Hockett (Talk) 06:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am requesting semi-protection for Ismail al-Faruqi and a set of pages related to him due to chronic sockpuppetry. These pages are a daily or weekly target of newly created socks of Ibn Juferi, and semi-protection will slow down the sockmaster's ability to change these pages. In addition to Ismail al-Faruqi and for the same reason, I am requesting semi-protection for:

Thank you! Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:21, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I looked at all the articles' histories. Chronic sockpuppetry alone, if it's infrequent and the editors can deal with it, is not enough IMO to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case To take one example, of the last ~800 edits on Ismail al-Faruqi, going back to June when the socking started on this topic, all but about 20 are sockpuppet/sockmaster/IP LOUTSOCK edits (including Ibn Juferi, DashnorKemalit, Abu Muawiyah, The Muslim Apologist, GoldenRipple, DrunkenJoe, and SmirkTales). That averages out to roughly five sock edits every single day, which seems pretty frequent to me. The request is only for semi-protection. Thanks -- Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you'd be better with pending changes then? I am not sure this is enough to justify preventing all non-autoconfirmed editors from editing the articles? Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think pending changes is better suited for this situation then I would be ok with that as an alternative. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the Ismail al-Faruqi, Murder of the Faruqis, Islam and the Problem of Israel, and Trialogue of the Abrahamic Faiths fall under WP:CT/A-I. Beyond that, I don't think pending changes makes sense because of the high proportion of sockpuppet edits and I'm not sure pending changes reviewers will be able to reliably reject a lot of these edits. I think semi-protection or ECP makes more sense. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that semi-protection is best (or ECP if warranted under contentious topics), but pending changes would provide some friction to the sock master. Any kind of protection would be helpful here (a newly created account has just restored the sock contributions to all of the articles under discussion). Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CsmLearner 💬🔬 04:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has no sensitive contents that it required protection. Many datas are old that needs to be corrected which and extented confirm under can't focus........ . 106.221.114.2 (talk) 03:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: the protection was appropriate under the circumstances (quite a bit of sockpuppetry), and it cannot be reversed through this process anyway. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant IP vandalism in the infobox and controversies section. Xoocit (talk) 09:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Name is being changed by vandalizers to Kaua Quader repeatedly. Rht bd (talk) 09:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA is active today, please protect. Nobody (talk) 10:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 08:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing socking by User:Bigboss19923, five sock accounts and an IP over the last month. Belbury (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 13:22, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Being a new article on an upcoming subject, IP users have been adding large numbers of speculative and unsourced false information. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 11:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The issue seems to be one particular IP. I have left a message on the IP's talk page. If this continues I will be happy to block that IP. If it spreads to multiple IPs or new user, I will be happy to semi-protect the page. Yaris678 (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing sneaky vandalism perpetrated by Huddersfield students. Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. C F A 💬 14:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated instances of vandalism by multiple IPs and accounts over the past month or so, which has yet to stop despite warnings and several IP blocks. ArkHyena (it/its) 15:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 12:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor keeps adding unsourced material, breach of 3RR WWGB (talk) 12:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Yaris678 (talk) 14:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. New users are changing name of the person about whom the page is. Techdelixir (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 15:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fathoms Below (talk) 19:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mobile editor keep changing the intro to the page. NHL considers Coyotes to be inactive, but mobile editor keep saying otherwise GoodDay (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
18:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – AGAIN. Tres Libras (talk) 18:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. Favonian (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:EW in a WP:ARBAP2 article. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:38, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muboshgu I'm not sure semi-protection would work here since the editor you reverted is extended confirmed. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ahecht, of course. I didn't know that I wanted to suggest full protection.... – Muboshgu (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The editor being reverted most frequently is a non-autoconfirmed editor who only created his account yesterday and has only edited this article. Let's see how this works. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violation of WP:GENSEX CTOP requiring RD2. Requesting Abitration enforcement. Raladic (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One of the many election related articles suffering IP disruption for a long time. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 18:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Contest dispute, mostly between IP users (I count about 12 reverts in the last four days). Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 20:27, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Makeandtoss (talk) 20:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Left CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Over half of previous 50 edits were IP vandalism Wildfireupdateman (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite 2600:100C:B0A1:E6C9:CD09:7EFD:F279:B827 (talk) 22:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sudden influx of vandalism Wildfireupdateman (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (TCL) 20:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Asilvering. Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Every edit has been reverted. There should be no need to edit this page directly. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:12, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2024

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Also potential sockpuppetry, but no hard evidence/investigation. Sinclairian (talk) 15:40, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 8 previous protections. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This page gets vandalised almost every year for the last couple of years. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP editor disruption as Silent Night, Deadly Night Part 2, which is currently semi-protected until February 11. MrOllie (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I have found cases of disruptive editing on this article done by IP users and newcomers. Kolano123 (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean that there has been unconstructive edits on the article Kiwifruit. Kolano123 (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited in three days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent history is mostly vandalism and reverts Tule-hog (talk) 17:37, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Special page with no reason for new users to edit, has years of sporadic vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 00:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent editing regarding status as Archbishop, which has not been established as of yet in sources. Mostly by new accounts or IP. Request temporary PP to reduce instances. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not really seeing a lot of reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 22:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Individual has just died. Mobile/IP editors are messing up the infobox & page, due to lack of knowledge on the subject & topic. GoodDay (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]