User talk:Adakiko

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

5

WikiDefcon 5: 1.88 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot

Amanda Hearst Edits

You reverted my edit on Amanda Hearst and justified it by saying "you removed content without adequately explaining why." In fact I did not remove content, I only moved it to a new section. Here is a link to the diff which shows the changes between edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amanda_Hearst&diff=prev&oldid=1233545260 You can use this to see what parts of the page were changed.

I'm not going to restore my edit until I have reached consensus with you, so please let me know. 2620:1F7:8DE:1041:0:0:1:2 (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit removed 537 characters and one reference. See the page history: here for size change. The page before your edit: 15 citations, the page after your edit: 14 citations. Please don't expect others to analyze your edit when you could leave an wp:edit summary. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect a user to analyze an edit before reverting it. I would certainly extend that consideration to you or any other user. Since your objection to my edit seems to be primarily based on the lack of an edit summary, and not the content of the change, I have restored it, this time with a summary. Hopefully this resolves your concern. Thank you. 170.225.223.23 (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you expect others to spend time to analyze your edits when you can simply supply an edit summary? While wp:AGF does support an editor checking edits, so many complicated edits are made w/o an ES that many wp:RCP and admins will revert edits that they can not understand with a quick review.

BTW: Your undo removed a citation and you didn't explain why. It is the fourth citation on the previous version here. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SolidWorks

I check the grammar itself and also all of them to make sure it is well readable for the people.@Adakiko Kali132 (talk) 13:20, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kali132: Please format talk page correctly. Your edit appeared to be related to Amanda Hearst. I reformatted it and added the SolidWorks section header. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 13:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infiltration (medical) Edit

You reverted my edit to the above page, claiming entirely erroneously that I did not explain this edit. I explained this edit on the talk page. It seems from the comments below that you make a habit of this sort of thing. Have you stopped to ask yourself why? Are you just out to dissuade people from contributing and improving wikipedia? Can I suggest that you restore my edit, which turned a piece of crap page into something useful, and that you reflect on the effects of your ill-informed policing of new edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JA Translator (talk • contribs) 11:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JA Translator: I am a wp:RCP; I get lots of fan mail. Your wp:edit summary (ES), by itself, did not give a valid reason for removal. You should state in the ES to see the talk page - relevant section. If you had added to the ES: "See talk:Infiltration (medical)", I would not have undone your edit.

If you do undo someone else's edit, please leave an ES explaining why? Beware of wp:edit warring issues.

Please leave new talk at the bottom of the page. I moved your talk here. Also, Please link to the article in question. I added a link in the section heading. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 19:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vallapuzha

The edits were true since I am a resident of the region. Pradeepom1985 (talk) 12:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pradeepom1985: Use of your own knowledge is wp:original research. You need to cite a wp:reliable source. See help:referencing for beginners. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Will add some ref Pradeepom1985 (talk) 12:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source TCR Asia Series

https://www.p300.it/tcr-asia-finale-di-stagione-ancora-rimandato-o-forse-cancellato/

Not familiar with Wikipedia editing at all, please do add this and change the rest of the page, thanks. 38.94.108.6 (talk) 05:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on editor's talk page. Adakiko (talk) 06:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]