User talk:Adakiko/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Adakiko. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Some bubble tea for you!
Excellent anti-vandal work, go buy some bubble tea for yourself (irl), or some other food if you don't like bubble tea. Consider applying for some rollbacker/pending changes reviewer role, you seem to be a nice editor :) Justiyaya (talk) 07:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC) |
- @Justiyaya: Thanks for the tea! I would, except I will get sucked into it again and I can't stop! Marriage and life suffer... Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oh... if you feel addicted to editing Wikipedia consider taking a forced wikibreak Justiyaya (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Justiyaya: I'd need an app so my significant other could force a lockout. Also should tie it into my calendar. ;o) I'm over doing it for tonight. I should be doing other things! Thanks for the advise! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- That sounds great! (sorry about the late reply, I think the ping somehow didn't go through) Justiyaya (talk) 05:04, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Justiyaya: I'd need an app so my significant other could force a lockout. Also should tie it into my calendar. ;o) I'm over doing it for tonight. I should be doing other things! Thanks for the advise! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oh... if you feel addicted to editing Wikipedia consider taking a forced wikibreak Justiyaya (talk) 08:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Mannur
- Moved from my user page to here. Adakiko (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't think. I did anything wrong with the edits on Mannur. It is my village. Pls can you undo the changes. I think I have to escalate this to another admin in the Wikipedia team. @Viswaprabha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anoopmannur (talk • contribs) 05:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Anoopmannur: I moved your edit content from my user page: user:Adakiko to here as talk goes on one's talk page, not my user page. See help:talk pages
- You are quite welcome to bring this up with anyone you wish so long as it doesn't amount to wp:Canvassing. Discussion about article content generally should go on the article's talk page: talk:Mannur
- In regard to your email to me, I agree, I don't have much idea about Mannur. I didn't undo it for the factual correctness of your edit, but the style, wp:verifiability, and formatting of your edit. The latter I have a bit more knowledge of than Mannur. You might be able to get help from one of your fellow countrymen at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Blast furnace
Blast furnace, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Dylath Leen (talk) 09:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Ukrah or Nagarukhra topic
Dear friend, i here to pay attention to the article of Ukrah. Actually Ukrah is not the Village, its a Small sattlement under the Village of Nagarukhra. Thats why, here i wish to you to change the name of the article Ukrah into Nagarukhra. Even you can check in google and its every govt. names are included as Nagarukhra, Ukrah just a 'mouja' in Nagarukhra. Here my request to you, please solve the naming problem of the article. Iamakashnathsarkar (talk) 16:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Oliver Twist page
Hi Adakiko, I just saw the message you sent me about my edit to the Oliver Twist page, and the edit related to the quotation of Nancy as a 'whoring slut.' I still think the quote, which I think is from Frank Donovan, should be omitted because it doesn't add any important information about Nancy and doesn't use neutral language to describe Nancy e.g. it doesn't merely say 'Nancy was a prostitute who was killed by Sikes.' Apologies if I sound annoyed, don't mean to, and I'm new to this Wikipedia editing, but I'm not sure why my edit was considered unhelpful? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raccy745 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Raccy745: You were wp:edit warring which is strongly frowned upon. If you want to make such a change, I would recommend discussing the issue on talk:Oliver Twist and reach wp:consensus before proceeding. Personally, I have no issue with the wording towards the made-up character Nancy. Resources you might find useful: wp:help, wp:dispute resolution, and wp:BRD. The help pages accessible in the left-most column. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Undid your reversion of the Tommy Kirk article
I was in the midst of touchups on the Tommy Kirk article when you reverted it. I saw you reason "unexplained deletion". Having checked through the change comparison, I suspect you might have reacted without careful inspection to the big gap after "ON TELEVISION", which I did not delete, but rather converted to lower case. The change comparison software seems to have failed to recover sync until long after that, but if you check the text on both sides of the gap, I believe you'll see that it's all there.
All the changes that I made (or at least intended to make) are inserting blank spaces to allow the citations to break in sensible spots (so that I can compare citations), inserting non-breaking spaces in some dates, and converting as many text-only citations as coneniently possible into template format. If you find that I've exceeded modest touchups of the internals, please go ahead and re-do your reversion, but kindly check carefully this time. I'm reasonably confident that you didn't do so before.
166.205.91.9 (talk) 07:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Laz Díaz
Apologies for screwing up on the version to revert to on the page; I'm trying my best but I now realize I was restoring a version that was not clean of vandalism. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Mikehawk10: Same here. I revert three then discover a fourth made it in between. Need an admin! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Citations missing from JH page
Hello,
Regarding your message about editing the Johnny Hollow page and missing citations. Yes, I was working on getting those. I was talking with one of the band members and I'm helping them update their page. I was going to work on the citations later. However, I can post-pone putting the info up until I get them instead. ClumsyRaven (talk) 19:38, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- @ClumsyRaven: It is a good idea to add citations with your edit. There are many people who monitor changes and will undo unsourced content on sight (like me). See WP:CHALLENGE. It's difficult to save a changed page to see if it gets added later, so they undo immediately. Often to the consternation of the editors and some veteran Wikipedia editors. You do need to mind that WP:COI! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Don’t vandalise
You straight up delete valuable content, just because, and then excuse it because it can be a mistake. Don’t edit ever again. Hayashihouyi (talk) 03:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
I never said "safe and effective" I said only that there are case studies reported and a growing number of health practitioners that incorporate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DannyVerinder (talk • contribs) 12:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Idukki orthodox diocese edit
Why are you discouraging me ? Is there anything I made wrong. Check out Malankara Orthodox website about Idukki diocese and other websites. Varghese T Mathew (talk) 06:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Meena
I have mentioned several times about this to many editors admins here..only a few responded to my side . Anonymous IP address continuously adding irrelavant fan based unwon awards to that article..repeatedly..i provided several times the reason while editing ..but that page is vandalised by an anonymous user.. Josh janakiraman (talk) 07:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
this is the anonymous editor vandalising that page 175.145.84.9, reported him to many..but no active response ,for that user's disruptive edits.. Kindly check the history of article meena, for what that user done on fan base. Josh janakiraman (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Josh janakiraman: You had deleted content and source without leaving an edit summary in that group of edits, which is why I reverted you. I would strongly recommend leaving edit summaries. If there is significant recent vandalism, request page protection at wp:RFPP. Suggest reading other RfPPs to get an idea of how to make a brief request.
Please read wp:vandalism as to what is and is not considered such. It has a fairly specific meaning on Wikipedia. Another editor called it a wp:content dispute. See wp:dispute resolution I have no interest in the subject of that article. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:01, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Check as per source keenfully then remove what u think is wrong and recover what u think is right as per year and sources Josh janakiraman (talk) 08:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Josh janakiraman: Please format your talk per wp:talk page guidelines - WP:TALKGAP. As I said above, "I have no interest". Not interested in reading about actors. If you don't want others to misunderstand your edits, I suggest adding clear wp:ES. Adakiko (talk) 08:08, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Bahreladih (Barabanki)
Please is article publish ठाकुर महेश प्रताप सिंह बहरेलिया (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Bahreladih (Barabanki)
Please publish my page ठाकुर महेश प्रताप सिंह बहरेलिया (talk) 19:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- @ठाकुर महेश प्रताप सिंह बहरेलिया and ठाकुर महेश प्रताप सिंह बहरेलिया: I don't know what you mean. Do you want to add that gazette link to Bahreladih (Barabanki)? This one? https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.2993/page/n209/mode/2up If so, where do you want it added? I reformatted Bahreladih (Barabanki) a bit. It still needs work. Adakiko (talk) 20:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Important notice
Hi Adakiko,
regarding the article Mark Sargeant, please keep the following points in mind.
- Per WP:ONUS, part of the verifiability policy, the onus is on you to gain a consensus for the inclusion of material.
- Per WP:BLPCRIME, part of the BLP policy, "a living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law."
- Edit warring is not part of the recommended dispute resolution methods.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Thanks for your thoughtful message pointing this out! Need to stop and think. Sort of thought about it, but I guess I got sucked in. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, thank you very much for your recent changes patrolling. I've positively noticed your work on the other AIV cases. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- ~ ToBeFree I also may have erred here. Some brand new user kept deleting a sexual harassment allegation that was a few years old and appeared verifiable. I suspected the user was solely trying to remove negative information from an article, possibly due to a COI or other bias. Please could you confirm if my reverts were problematic? I know BLPs are super important. Thanks Such-change47 (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Reverting actually unexplained content removal is usually fine. The removal was indeed unexplained first, so I can't complain about interpreting this removal as likely intentional damage. Most similar article content removal is vandalism after all. The user then continued to remove the material, this time providing edit summaries explaining their view. In most cases, when someone explicitly complains about "defamatory content", that's a good point to stop reverting and to thoroughly analyze the situation. Even if you are completely convinced that the material a) qualifies for inclusion in the article (WP:UNDUE may be a concern), and b) is completely perfectly verifiable: Even then, we should wonder whether it's really worth insisting on keeping the material. Someone strongly objects to its inclusion, so the best next step is starting a discussion with them. This could be done by creating a new section on the article's talk page, and then inviting the user to that section. {{Please see}} can be a helpful template for doing so.
- Especially if the case is clear, it should be easy to find a consensus for including the material. Opinions can be invited by leaving a neutral discussion invitation message at a relevant noticeboard such as WP:NPOVN or WP:BLPN, or by requesting a third opinion.
- A common problem, however, is that the other party doesn't like to discuss. You invite them to a discussion, they stay silent, you restore the material after a week of silence, and they suddenly revert you again. Dealing with such cases is described by WP:DISCFAIL, one of the very few essays (non-policies, non-guidelines) that are actually worth reading in my opinion.
- To answer your actual question, Such-change47, mmh, well, you've joined the edit war when it was already at a point to better stop. So I'd say yes, that was problematic, but it's a common and understandable mistake. No worries. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- ~ ToBeFree thanks very much. Such-change47 (talk) 12:18, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- ~ ToBeFree I also may have erred here. Some brand new user kept deleting a sexual harassment allegation that was a few years old and appeared verifiable. I suspected the user was solely trying to remove negative information from an article, possibly due to a COI or other bias. Please could you confirm if my reverts were problematic? I know BLPs are super important. Thanks Such-change47 (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, thank you very much for your recent changes patrolling. I've positively noticed your work on the other AIV cases. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree:, you're welcome! And, thank you for all of your admin work. I don't know how you admins can deal with this sort of thing! It's some real dedication!
- Do you think I should get rollback rights and use Huggle? The Christmas season is soon upon us. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the kind feedback. :)
- I'll probably grant rollback on Christmas; you won't need to request it. Granting it right now would be a bit early, though. There are two weeks remaining during which I can see that no further edit warring occurred. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: WP:DISCFAIL is something I've been looking for. I've essentially have been winging it; overwhelmed with policy that isn't easily comprehensible and implementable. Thanks again! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- I felt similar when finding that essay! You're welcome, of course. :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: WP:DISCFAIL is something I've been looking for. I've essentially have been winging it; overwhelmed with policy that isn't easily comprehensible and implementable. Thanks again! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Misbah ul haq
I am sorry actually I tried to edit someone else but by mistake I edited Misbah ul haq so please forgive me. 115.96.123.121 (talk) 05:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Addition to site removed
I added to a page on prog group Fruupp and my entry was removed. I’m not sure who? 2A00:23C4:7712:901:292E:D33C:8E93:3C10 (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- I removed this addition to Fruupp as it was unsourced. Per wp:verifiability content needs to wp:cite a wp:reliable source. See help:referencing for beginners Adakiko (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a happy rollback
Hello Adakiko: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
- Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
- Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "
[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]
" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]
" is helpful. - Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
- If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
- Use common sense.
To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: Thank you, a Merry Christmas and happy holidays to you! I promise to be a good boy! Adakiko (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Matthew Olshefski
You need to stop Censoring the changes that are being made to the Shirtless Violinist wiki everything that is being changed is 100000% the truth about Matthew Olshefski and Paul Castle keep changing it and I will file a complaint against you. I have interviewed people who they have hurt and everything that is posted about him being in a cult comes from his mouth he went on live TV to talk about his past and you go and delete the truth about someone they hurt and betrayed. I am also a investigative report for a private government company Max Alex Harvey (talk) 12:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Bob Fitzgerald Article
Hello Adakiko! Thanks for the edits. I realized that what I said wasn't supported by a source, hence I deleted it. Thanks again! Unknownvr0 (talk) 07:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Many thanks for amending the Neovenator page for me. My small contribution was collected over a two week period but was not recognised as important until I showed my finds to Dr Phil Manning [Professor of Paleontology at the College of Charleston in South Carolina and Professor of Natural History at the University of Manchester (UK).] He immediately recognised them as from the thereopod Neoventator and contacted Steve Hutt at the Dinosaur Isle Museum, Although fragmentary they indicate an animal much bigger than the holotype and the possibility the site was a 'predator trap' given this was the fourth individual from a relatively small area. Pliosaur68 (talk) 14:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC) |
@Pliosaur68: Thanks for the barnstar! Interesting find. Are you a trained archeologist? What school? My sister-in-law hunts fossils as a semi-hobby. She and her husband buy and sell them at Tuscon and in the Sacramento area. Thanks again! Adakiko (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I am familiar with what it means. I was just trying to ascertain his true intentions. Thanks for clearing that up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NavyBlueSunglasses (talk • contribs) 12:32 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome! Please remember to sign your talk with four tildes? You can link to Wiktionary with [[wikt:a pox on]] - e.g. wikt:a pox on Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
A Barnstar for You!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your valiant work at Laz Díaz to combat a horde of angry vandals. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC) |
Berman -- I'm new!
Thank you for your note about the Berman article. This was my first edit and I didn't add a summary change. I edited it because the article used the "n-word" written in full, so I rephrased it to take out the slur, and added also added a citation that was lacking. I reverted your revert, but please let me know if that wasn't considered proper etiquette. Thank you! Extension23 — Preceding undated comment added 14:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Michael Connelly The Dark Hours cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Connelly The Dark Hours cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
In defense of Ligers
I have a very valid reason to remove info from the Liger article. You see the article talks about Panthera Hybrids being susceptible to "diseases". This is obvious evidence that Wikipedians hate Ligers. For starters, this animal rights groups never gave any actual evidence of weather they did had diseases or not. Second, this is in reference to the Liger, not Panthera hybrids as a whole. Third, they stated that only with captive animals, but they never said anything about wild Panthera hybrids. Not to mention that sayin g that Lions cannot breed with Tigers is incorrect. Its scientifically confirmed that all species within the same genus are able to be attracted, mate and successfully crossbreed. There is also evidence that Panthera hybrids where very common in ancient times:https://markgelbart.wordpress.com/tag/tiger-x-snow-leopard-hybrid/. Not to mention you gave a reference to Carol Bazkin, who has a reputation of being hypocritical for saying that she did not want to see big cats in captivity yet she does exactly the same. Not to mention there is the possibility she feed her husband to tigers. There is also evidence that Humans mated with Neanderthals, this is no different from Panthera hybrids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56FireLeafs (talk • contribs) 08:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
About the European Bon
The page talks about how the european bison was SUPPOSEDELY a hybrid even though there is evidence that its result of incomplete lineage sorting during divergence of Bos and Bison from their common ancestors and that the European Bison is the descendant of Bison Shoenski, and the fact that the steppe bison lived alongside the european bison. But even more, there is evidence that breeding bos with bison has result in genetic pollution of bison. 56FireLeafs 7:15 January 17 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 56FireLeafs (talk • contribs) 00:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @56FireLeafs: The only source does not use terminology that implies "possibly". Wikipedia goes by what wp:RS states, not wp:OR.
- After all those requests to do so, you are still not signing your talk. Adakiko (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Removal of false, libelous, and retracted reference
The revisions which were just made to "Young Warriors" aka "Graduates of Malibu High" are accurate. The LA Times article referenced was false and libelous and retracted by the publication. The source of the false and libelous information was the subject of a lawsuit which was settled with compensation and a written statement stating that the information provided to the LA Times was false and inaccurate. Please do not undo the legitimate revision. CineMG (talk) 07:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @CineMG To help everyone here, please link to a published retraction and ensure it is available to those who appear oblivious to it. Without it, we only have your word. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Nick Moyes: This question was also asked on user talk:CineMG#Removal of false, libelous, and retracted reference Thanks for the clean-up and note! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
After becoming more familiar with Wikipedia policies I understand the reasons for your concerns and undoing my edits. I certainly had no intention of creating an edit war. The intention is to remove defamatory content which was discredited and the false claims acknowledged and reversed in writing by the perpetrator. The newspaper article containing the false and defamatory content was linked to multiple Wikipedia subjects. I will gladly locate and provide the substantiating references and documentation to support the need for my edits on the pages of the affected subjects. The statement - which follows - by @ToBeFree on another Adakiko section is directly relevant here: "In most cases, when someone explicitly complains about "defamatory content", that's a good point to stop reverting and to thoroughly analyze the situation. Even if you are completely convinced that the material a) qualifies for inclusion in the article (WP:UNDUE may be a concern), and b) is completely perfectly verifiable: Even then, we should wonder whether it's really worth insisting on keeping the material." Thank you for your attention to this matter CineMG (talk) 02:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Gregory Perdicaris
I re-added content along with relevant citations
Hope is ok now
Should there be any issue please let me know 78.87.52.169 (talk) 10:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
On the matter of Kali
Sorry Mr. I was trying to write something else. And all what I have mentioned have been first asked to Vaishno Devi chief Veda pandit n then mentioned. I hope there is nothing disruptive in the information I have given. Aryan Vashist (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Sir I already explained the edits
Sir I already explained the edits why don't you look the edits. Please leave it Translated with DeepL Translator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporary tempuras (talk • contribs) 03:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
LIsten to me. Albert Aragunov: Grammar errors. Cleanups. Sources are biased or display false information. Is that enough reason for you? Translated with DeepL Translator Temporary tempuras (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Look at yours talk page
Look at the messages...Temporary tempuras (talk) 03:39, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Read my messages on your talk page before you delete anything more
Read my messages on your talk page before you delete anything more. Translated with DeepL Translator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temporary tempuras (talk • contribs) 03:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, I hit enter by mistake :)
I'm tracking down verification for my changes to the Fellowship page! I stupidly hit enter before I had pasted the verifications links in the box at the bottom. Working on it now! :)
Red5-5757 (talk) 04:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Red5-5757: No problem! I sort of figured that. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 04:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: Thanks for your patience. :) Can I "revert your reversion" and put all of my verification links into one summary? Or is there a preferred way for me to verify now? Red5-5757 (talk) 04:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Red5-5757: You need to add an inline citation. I'll leave a note on your talk page. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Pls clarify the maintenance templates you added on this page Apollo Quiboloy
@Adakiko 11:34 AM, Friday, January 28, 2022 (UTC)
What content do you consider as "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (January 2022)"? Why did you add that the Church Background section has no citation when there is a citation already added. - EarlneyZ (talk)
- @EarlneyZ: fixed? Adakiko (talk) 11:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: You have to answer my question so it can be fixed. What content do you consider as advertisement? Why did you add that the Church Background section has no citation when there is a citation already added? EarlneyZ (talk) 11:34 AM, Friday, January 28, 2022 (UTC)
- @EarlneyZ: The article had content that was written in a promotional matter. That was cleaned up, so I removed it. You had removed the tag without indicating that it had been remedied, so I replaced it.
- I appear to have missed the citation, so I thought the section was unsourced. I removed the unsourced section tag. Adakiko (talk) 11:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: You have to answer my question so it can be fixed. What content do you consider as advertisement? Why did you add that the Church Background section has no citation when there is a citation already added? EarlneyZ (talk) 11:34 AM, Friday, January 28, 2022 (UTC)
Britt has passed away
Britt has passed away im one of her daughters and im hopeless at this stuff what shoul i do 2A00:23C7:7984:7F01:914D:B746:AB99:B65C (talk) 04:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is there an obituary or news article regarding his death? A link to that is all you need to add. Just put <ref>[https://... ]</ref> (leave out the nowiki stuff and the < > surrounding them). Check your edit the with wp:Show preview button. Some people just add that sort of thing as a bad joke. Adakiko (talk) 04:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Still no news visible about Britt Allcroft online (including The Guardian). The purported daughter said the news was on her Facebook page, but it isn't. Her death was hoaxed in September 2021. David Brooks (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks: Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Still no news visible about Britt Allcroft online (including The Guardian). The purported daughter said the news was on her Facebook page, but it isn't. Her death was hoaxed in September 2021. David Brooks (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Adaiko is a Wikipedia Vandaliser and Bully
You have no right to vandalise Wikipedia pages. 117.99.208.148 (talk) 16:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I wouldn't go that far but if he is working for Satan he needs to get a better boss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.85.205.29 (talk) 07:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Henry Cavill page
I saw on fan forums that people were planning to insult his current relationship by making changes to his page. How can I report that? Fairnessa (talk) 02:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Fairnessa: Do you have a URL link to that? I'll report it asap! Adakiko (talk) 02:39, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
The Death Of Jimi Hendrix
Hi Adakiko, The information that I tried to add to the page is from an email from CG to Dr. Seifert. It can be viewed in full on my research page about the death of JH (the link is at the bottom of the Death Of Jimi Hendrix page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgesdelatour345 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Georgesdelatour345: Which link? The fan guide? If it's an email, how would one determine its authenticity? Adakiko (talk) 20:13, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Adakiko: One would have to trust the source of course. It makes sense though, seeing that Hendrix was rushed to the Resuscitation Room - something that is never done with long dead bodies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgesdelatour345 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Georgesdelatour345: Is your source at this link: http://hendrix.guide.pagesperso-orange.fr/death.htm ? If so, it appears to be wp:selfpublished.
- BTW: please sign your talk per the method on the second to last line of your talk page. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 22:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
@Adakiko: Yes, that is the link. I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean about signing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgesdelatour345 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Georgesdelatour345: Please restore your content with your source. See help:referencing for beginners. You might find it reverted as the source being wp:selfpublished. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:25, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
@Adakiko: Thanks. I checked the linked page and the sources are indicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgesdelatour345 (talk • contribs) 12:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Klasky Csupo opening titles for In Living Color
You can look at the Klasky Csupo wikipedia page to see that they did the opening sequences for all 5 seasons. Robert Jason is listed as producer in the credits in the left sidebar. I can email you the invoice that I have that lists the work we did for Klasky Csupo on this job. Respectfully.47.221.39.101 (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC) >>Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, In Living Color, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.221.39.101 (talk)
- I replied on your talk page: User talk:47.221.39.101 Adakiko (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- The Klasky Csupo#Work section cites few to no sources. I added a maintenance template to that effect. You can fix it! See help:referencing for beginners. BTW: Wikipedia is not a wp:reliable source. See wp:CIRCULAR Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello Adakiko: you do realize that Klasky Csupo is in the credits of the TV show, right? 'Main Title Sequence by Klasky Csupo' I can't include the link here but you can search it on YouTube. 47.221.39.101 (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- That would be an acceptable source! Please mention it in your edit summary to avoid this sort of thing! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I am learning how to correctly post. Thanks for your help!47.221.39.101 (talk) 11:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- My apology on this fiasco! Please consider getting an wp:account? It makes communication and recognition much easier! It actually gives you a bit more privacy. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamedsuppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Old Spanish Fort Edits
Hi Adakiko, Thanks for the helpful links and reminders. I have a particular passion for a couple of topics that I want to make sure are described accurately in WP and so I’ve recently made some edits and additions to two articles. I don’t expect that I will be doing a host of other edits on other pages. Was your letter in direct reference to the edits I had made? If so did you have specific recommendations for corrections?
One of the edits was to satisfy a “citation needed” which I did. Unfortunately, I managed to insert duplicate references and am not sure how to remove one. Nor do I know how to have the “citation needed” removed. Also, how do you cite the page and para where the specific supporting text can be found in that reference?
Thanks J J.gadbois (talk) 13:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
cyrus engerer
First, he is a criminal, secondly, death threats? ridiculous.--84.225.167.78 (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Deepa
Sorry sir please change Page about ms.deepa she was known as two names Deepa Jayakumar And Deepa Madhavan please you change Page name Deepa Jayakumar to j deepa 2409:4072:6C07:F85:0:0:5FC8:D206 (talk) 11:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Vaiko
Sir now vaiko's son Durai vaiyapuri as mdmk generel Secretary and Vaiko is the president of mdmk 2409:4072:6C07:F85:0:0:5FC8:D206 (talk) 11:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Edits by 34.19g.63.41
Thanks for your help in limiting the damage caused by 34.19g.63.41, a suspected sockpuppet of Sauraved. One note, however: WP:INDICSCRIPT "only applies to articles that are predominantly India-related and is excluded from, among others, articles about ... any of India's neighbouring countries." In other words, it doesn't apply to predominantly Bangladesh-related articles, in which it is common to display the native name in Bengali script in the lead and/or the infobox. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Worldbruce: Thanks for pointing that out. I had gotten it into my head they were Indian articles. I think I've restored most or all of the Bengali names. Two steps forward, one and a half back. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I saw your message about deleting my addition to the Machiavellianism page because I didn't have a citation. I in fact added the citation in the last sentence. I also have the citation right here. ^ Miller, Joshua D.; Vize, Colin; Crowe, Michael L.; Lynam, Donald R. (2019-04-30). "A Critical Appraisal of the Dark-Triad Literature and Suggestions for Moving Forward". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 28 (4): 353–360. doi:10.1177/0963721419838233. ISSN 0963-7214. All the information I added came from this citation. Are you able to add it back or do I have to? New to Wikipedia. Thanks. -Isah1998 (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Isah1998: This is what you added. This is what I removed Looks like you forgot to add it. Your edit has been saved in the wp:page history, please add your citation with the content. New content on talk pages should go at the bottom of the page. See help:talk pages Cheers Adakiko (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Editing the article on inferential confusion
Hi Adakiki, You recently left a message on my talk page about my article. I wanted to check with you if your message was because you felt my references weren't reliable? Because I tried to make sure all the references I used were peer reviewed and had a good impact factor, so can you please let me know what else I can do to improve this aspect. Also I made sure none of my sentences were copy pasted so can you please let me know what you felt is copy pasted so I can work on that, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roosmuff (talk • contribs) 11:38, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Roosmuff: That was simply a welcome page with some useful sources. No issues there.
- Please avoid wp:primary sources even though they are peer-reviewed. See WP:SCHOLARSHIP. Peer-viewed doesn't guarantee that the content is valid; just indicates those few reviewers didn't spot any issues; if they even read the paper and/or looked at the data. Lots of peer-viewed papers that are relegated to the dust-bin or even retracted. Especially those that question Einstein. ;o) It is preferable to uses secondary sources such as a meta analysis published by a reliable publisher. See wp:reliable sources and WP:RSP. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
I have removed extra barcket here:
Klaus Ofner (born 15 June 1968) in Murau, Steiermark) is an Austrian nordic combined skier — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.17.157.60 (talk) 18:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- You are correct. The right parenthesis was hidden by other brackets. I undid my edit. Thanks for your message! Adakiko (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello
Sure of course mate, will sort. Thanks DIG215 (talk) 04:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Justerini and Brooks
I did a lot more than remove dead links. The article is full of spammy peacock content and most of the footnotes that weren't dead were primary sources from J&B's own website. It's been marked for maintenance for years now, and you're going to put all that back w/o even looking at what I did? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Just Another Cringy Username: I have no problem with your removal of the peacock/coi material. Regarding the other material: See wp:KDL. Also, see Template:Citation needed#How to respond to this tag. e.g. don't delete just because it's tagged. A number of the citation needed tags were just added. It's best to remove content in chucks rather than all at once. It allows for selective reverts. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Operations Medic SANDF
Hi. The changes I made to the page were grammatical and factual. In addition, I added further detail and clarity about the Medical Phase of the program. These changes are based on my experience and qualifications. I served 2 years conscripted to the SANDF as an Operational Medic in the border conflict in 1986 and I was an Instructor in the Medical Phase for a year in 1987. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:7F0F:4F00:1977:AC51:5105:A159 (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- It is appreciated that an expert edit an article. Regarding using your own expertise, please see wp:No original research. Per wp:verifiability (WP:V), content must wp:cite a wp:reliable resource (RS). People often want to look for further information or check on the validity of content. Unfortunately, "2001:8A0:7F0F:4F00:1977:AC51:5105:A159" doesn't say much about your expertise, so please cite RS.
- Also, please note the article is poorly sourced, or the existing sources appear inadequate. It would be appreciated if someone were to add more citations. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
- If you would like, I can format citations for you. If it's a website or book, let me know. I'll give you a list of what I would need. Adakiko (talk) 01:28, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, but I'm not agree with you
Hi Adakiko. Thanks for your correction, but the external link I have added is informational and contains a page where people can find different types of Centrifugal pumps with useful information and videos. Is that inappropriate for an encyclopedia?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorTiHa (talk • contribs) 06:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- @EditorTiHa: When much of the page is about chatting, calling, or requesting a quote. I disagree. If you want another viewpoint, ask at the wp:Teahouse. Please include the link: ttps://hvhindustrial.com/sub-category/centrifugal-pumps with your question. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 06:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Mkhitar Heratsi
Dear Adakiko, I have translated a part of the text from this page - Մխիթար Հերացի from Armenian to English. If the article on https://hy.wikipedia.org/ is someone's opinion, then I will agree with you, but it's a wiki page and contains historical information from the life of Mkhitar Heratsi, so sorry, but again, I don't agree with you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorTiHa (talk • contribs) 06:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Greshun De Bouse Page Book Inclusion
Thank you for the tip on the book inclusion. The book is on Amazon/Kindle, which is why I originally used the url. Please provide a specific example of how to cite the book according to wikipedia standards. Thank you.Sbhpost (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Sbhpost: See Template:Cite book#Examples About six examples down will bring you to an example with an ISBN: "Citing a chapter in a book with two joint authors and an editor" You can also use template:ISBN or template:ASIN independently with the format ISBN 0-8125-3635-5 or for Greshun De Bouse's book ASIN B093FJ2WTG (look at with the editor or click on to see its function). Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the book citing information. Also, please review the article for information that may read like an advertisement, and for improvements on reference citing. The topic is notable and I would like to improve the page according to standards. Sbhpost (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- You are welcome. I am more of an wp:RCP kind of editor... Short attention span. You might check out articles on other activists. See Category:American activists.
- Please thread talk and don't start a new section unless it's a new topic. See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the book citing information. Also, please review the article for information that may read like an advertisement, and for improvements on reference citing. The topic is notable and I would like to improve the page according to standards. Sbhpost (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. I am new here, and attempting to learn how this all works. Another user asked that we start a new section to reply to messages, and I thought that was the format. Sbhpost (talk) 10:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Sbhpost: You did fine. You didn't need to start a second section. I merged the two sections. Got it right the third time. Do thread / indent your talk though; it helps with readability. WP:INDENT Cheers Adakiko (talk)
Armstrong
Why do you remove my edit even though I added a cition source ??? 2603:6011:AB01:ABA:E486:72A8:D131:9E2C (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Did you read how to add a citation to a Wikipedia article? Adakiko (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
General Armstrong
Just seen your revision although his original citation is what I Originally had this is fine.
The reason I had that version up is I am still trying to confirm what unit he was with when he received the DSC as it was in August of 1943 he would have been the commanding general of the first Bombardment wing.
I don't know how to link the original citations I have as they are PDFs 2603:6011:AB01:ABA:E486:72A8:D131:9E2C (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
NaPTAN edit
Hello Adakiko,
Thank you for your message - that was the first time I’ve made a Wikipedia edit so I didn’t think to explain it.
However, the edit should stand. I removed a link to website which no longer exists, and which will be confusing to readers if they click the link and get redirected to an error. I work in the Department for Transport on the NaPTAN team, and there are a number of other edits that need to be made to the Wikipedia page. Do I need to explain every one? If so, how should I do this?
Best wishes,
Lucy 167.98.171.170 (talk) 12:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are archive sites that may have a copy. https://archive.org is one. wp:List of web archives on Wikipedia Per wp:KDL (keep dead links), a dead link is left as that indicated the content was verifiable at one time. You can add a
{{dl|Date=February 2022}}
. - It is usually a good idea to leave an wp:edit summary. That can help find edits by browsing the wp:page history. Also good if you've added content where a nearby citation supports your edit or if there may be a misunderstanding as to why you have made the edit. A wp:POV type of edit for instance.
- Hope this helps! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 19:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Maschsee
Please check the dimensions of the maschsee (max length = 2.4 km, max width 0.5 km, avarage depth = 2 m, surface area = 0.78 km³ = 780 000 m³) with the volume stated on the english page (160 000m³) and you will see that there is missing a "0". Also 1 600 000m³ is the value of the germam wikipedia page for the maschsee. --217.6.221.68 (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2022 (UTC) best wishes from Hannover, Olaf
- A "lake" that is a cross consisting of two channels 2.4km x 1 metre wide and one a 0.5km x 1 meter x 2 metre average depth would have a volume of 5,800 m³. Shall I change it to that value? That fits the criteria.
- Without a citation (which I added), it is very difficult to verify a value. I also tagged the article for lacking footnotes. Please see help:referencing for beginners and wp:verifiability as to why citations are needed. Making Wikipedia verifiable would be helpful. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:13, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
David A. R. White
Hi,
I was the one that was trying to edit the David A. R. White page. Sorry about the external link deal. I'm kind of new to editing and I was just trying to make it more clear. I was going to the original link say "archive" and adding the latest link to replace it. Why did you revert it and why is it "inappropriate for an encyclopedia"?
Also, I added more info on David White in the info box. Did you mean to remove that? I thought it would make more sense to put that info there.
Anston — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.152.82 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Replied on user talk:97.125.152.82 Adakiko (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Clone Hero page developer section
Yeah, it is incorrect that Ryan Foster and Matthew Sitton are the developers of Clone Hero. Matthew is the lead developer, and Ryan Foster is the creator, but the game is developed by a bigger team, there are more coders, and a bunch of artists, and they are often referred as "CH Team" which is what I added as it is correct. You can check this by going into the official CH discord server where you can see every member of the CH Team. They also have, in the official Clone Hero website news section; 2 news regarding the team, 1 for the Art Team and 1 for the Coding Team. As they are publicly referred as the "CH Team" that's what the developer name is.
In any case, revert your last change to that so it's fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.5.207.78 (talk) 03:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't care who developed it as long as the edit wp:cites a wp:reliable source (RS). Per wp:PROVEIT, the onus is on you to properly cite it. Adakiko (talk) 03:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I get where you are coming from, but you are also not giving a source that says that only Ryan and Matthew developed it, so we are on the same page, by that criteria neither you nor I should have credited "CH Team" and "Ryan and Matthew", in any case, here you have the two news from the official Clone Hero website that lists all the members of the team, both the coders and the artists (and even then, there are more coders, as you can see in their discord server and the news I'm linking here).
Coders: https://clonehero.net/2019/06/16/a-look-on-the-line.html
Which cites Srylain (Ryan Foster) and Matthew as TWO of the coders in the team, not the ENTIRE coding team.
Artists: https://clonehero.net/2019/04/28/a-sight-to-behold.html
The team has changed over the time, and more people has been added and some people has left, so it's pretty clear that CH team is the way to credit them, as it is how they have been calling themselves for years, unless you want to cite every single one of the team members in the developer section of the page. You tell me.
Also, the wiki is not a reliable source of information as it was discontinued in 2019. And even by following the wiki, there are, again, way more than 2 developers.
At this point you might want a screenshot of one of the developers confirming what I'm saying (which I can get), otherwise I don't understand what more reliable sources you want to not keep undoing the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.29.47.16 (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- FYI: repeated reverting is called wp:Edit warring. We are expected to discuss things, reach wp:Consensus, then make changes per consensus. See wp:dispute resolution and wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD). The state of the page should remain in the original state until consensus is reached.
- This discussion probably should be held on talk:Clone Hero.
- How do you find a list of developers? If it's on the game's credits as a list of developers, you can cite the game itself. You need to add the citation to your edit. People wanting to check it out are not going to look at the wp:edit summaries. It is best to avoid blogs, wp:self-published sources, and use secondary sources.
- To cite the game, just add something like <ref>Clone Hero V1.1 game credits</ref> Don't copy from the editor, the nowiki stuff shouldn't be copied. If it's more complicated, such as a web source, use the
{{cite web}}
wp:template. See help:referencing for beginners. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 00:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Fukuoka Subway 2000 series
Hello! I'm Kazukizuka. I forgot to write down the source. I'm sorry. I'll write down the source again. Thank you. カズキズカ (talk) 22:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
If you had looked carefully, you would have noticed at the bottom of the page, Agrell's paper on Deerite, Howieite and Zussmanite. Agrell is someone I knew personally, and I did a mineral trade with him when I was doing postdoctoral work under the future Sir Alan Battersby, 1973-1975. The story about how they were named he told me in person. I still have the Deerite, Howieite and Zussmanite specimens he traded to me. Indeed, he even traded to me a specimen of Agrellite, several years before the mineral was officially described and published. (I have since built a considerable Kipawa suite, the largest agrellite weighing about 28 pounds.) Years later, I got to visit the Laytonville locality myself, and collected heavily. Zussmanite was nowhere to be found on the outcrop, but in the gravel road at the base, near the highway, some zussmanite appeared. Then I noticed a huge boulder of it, weighing at least 150 pounds, more than I could lift, let alone carry across a highway. My hammer bounced off the boulder, and I got a few chips. One year later, again driving home from the Tucson mineral show towards Vancouver where I was living at the time, I found the boulder still there, untouched by anyone since my last visit. With daylight fast fading in the late afternoon, I drove North to Laytonville, where there was a general store. The store sold sledge hammers. I bought one and headed south back to the rock. Two or three taps of the sledgehammer reduced it to portable pieces, all of which I still own. Probably some of the largest zussmanite specimens in captivity. John B. Paine III, Ph.D. ex Harvard (organic chemistry) PS: I would recommend you return what I wrote to the article. I have posted heavily to Wikipedia before. I also strongly disagree with putting in citations for everything, if something is being written by an expert. Important knowledge will otherwise get lost. JBP3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.177.186.4 (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please see wp:no original research: Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves. Content on Wikipedia needs to be wp:verifiable (WP:V). Your personal knowledge would be considered "original research" It is not verifiable (unless you want to be on-call 24/7 to answer questions /s). Agrell's papers would be considered a wp:primary source. Wikipedia prefers secondary, or preferably, tertiary sources. If you wish to add a citation, see help:Referencing for beginners. If you wish to ask someone who is likely more knowledgeable than I, please ask at the wp:Teahouse. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Cites
Now there's something illogical about you deleting a name for lack of a ref ... but then restoring a name, that itself does not have a ref. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
John C. Young
Why was it removed as a good article? I gave it a full, legitimate review, and it looked ready. An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 13:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi
Hello, Unfortunately, all the information about Sefidrood Dam is wrong! I live in a city where the Sefidrood Dam is located, but who is the stupid, illiterate and homeless person who intentionally mistakenly included the photo of the Jajrud Dam instead of the real photo of the Sefidrood Dam! Please do not let any illiterate and stupid person change the information about Sefidrood Dam and its photos after I change it, because I live near Sefidrood Dam. Thank you . Khroodbar1400 (talk) 03:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Steve Redfern edit
Hi, sorry. I’ve just started on Wikipedia, Steve is my dad and just thought I’d update his page. I’d greatly appreciate any support in fixing this error I have made to have this on his page. Thanks! 85.211.105.1 (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- I fixed the citation to some degree and replaced the content. The link is to Majorca Beach Rugby, but the citation goes to Dudley Kingswinford. Is there an error? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Morgan Ortagus page
The edit I made to Morgan Ortagus’ page was based on my first hand knowledge of the Ortagus family. I added her two sister’s names. I could also I add that her father goes by Ronnie and is a recovered alcoholic, she had a dog named Napoleon who was spoiled rotten and while her youngest sister Marissa laid in a hospital bed shot all Morgan cared about was that another dog ate Napoleon’s toy. I’ve been to her parents house and have met most of her family in Polk County. Desiderata86 (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- You can pull the same information from her Facebook account and instagram account as well as public listings of who has lived in her parents house on Mandy St over the last 29 years. Desiderata86 (talk) 20:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Desiderata86: If he source wp:BLPRS and the info meets wp:ONUS, feel free to add it. You should add a citation with your edit. See help:referencing for beginners. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Paul Andrew
Hello - I received your message about these edits and apologize, as I'm definitely new to this and did not mean to violate any guidelines. However, the information on the page is indeed very outdated and several new press articles can be cited to support the updates. I'd very much appreciate any guidance on how to have these updates published. I do have a relationship to the brand but again, have numerous press sources to support the edits. Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennifercoxpr (talk • contribs) 04:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Sharksploitation
Thanks for your edit. The page is still undergoing a major revamp. A number of the references and links got a bit messed up during my last edit. I will review them at some point and look into guidelines and reasons for references and see what I can do in that area. The links and references currently in the article were made by the original poster, not me Simdude1990 (talk) 10:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Simdude1990: Thanks for doing that work! I just added an archive-url to the Sharksploitation.com external link. It appears to be a permanent 404. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 11:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Recent removal of text fro Causal Loop webpage
The sentence which was removed just provides information about a published solution to the problem discussed in that section together with a footnote citing the published solution. If this is permanently removed then readers will not know of this solution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CircuitOne (talk • contribs) 01:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
There are only two genders
Why must you people enable this type of mental illness. Nothing about Aimee Challenor is female nor does anything about him even resemble a famale. This insanity needs to be stopred. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.219.210 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Science disagrees with you. Adakiko (talk) 20:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Pigeonhole
Hello! My apologies I’m very new to this, in the process of creating a page for the band I added. My apologies for any inconvenience! Thanks, Sam AssumingRobin09 (talk) 21:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Yellow Rock is one of Sydney's most western parts, It is part of the Greater Western Sydney region.
Hey Adakiko, Great information on Yellow rock, but it does not state that it is part of the Greater Western Sydney region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sydneysiders11 (talk • contribs) 22:45, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Changes
You keep rejecting legit changes. 2604:2D80:4A8D:B500:0:0:0:56DA (talk) 03:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- You don't wp:cite a wp:reliable source. Also, see wp:NOR. Adakiko (talk) 04:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- delete the rocky boy page 63.153.95.120 (talk) 04:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Za'Darius Smith, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
edit to Herbert Marcuse
"[…] Your recent edit to Herbert Marcuse appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. […]"
The primary reason to change the label is that fascist is (almost) meaningless as a descriptor.[1] Germany after the Weimar Republic was emphatically not fascist, despite current bien-pensance.
The Soviets implemented International Socialism (through their ComIntern — "International Communism") and tried to export it as a worldwide revolution of the proletariate (hence the Trotskyites who still labour to do this even today) ultimately to be remotely controlled, of course, from Moscow and to which Hitler responded by creating German National Socialism, which was firmly under his control. Both systems are centrally controlled authoritarian dictatorships. And, although fascist Italy (the third Axis power, also a dictatorship) was an ally of Germany in WWII, so too was the Communist government under Stalin before Hitler abandoned the Ribbentrop-Molotov non-aggression pact. Recall that when the Italians capitulated to the Allies Hitler had no qualms about fighting them, too. The only hatred more potent than Leftists' hate of the Right is their hatred of other Leftists. (Fundamentally, the C18 French Revolutionary political dichotomy of Left-Right is particularly unhelpful[2] describing these ideologies, and the logical extension of your undoing of my correction is to use fascist for Stalinism, too, since they are more similar than they are different. Which, I would argue, is unhelpful. And why I edited the entry. For clarity's sake. ;)
Instead of the (emotionally charged) unclear term fascist it would be less confusing to use the historically accurate (English translation) of the authoritarian WWII German National Socialist administration —— a transliteration of the German Nationalsozialismus, known almost universally as Nazi. (Nazi would also be accurate but it, too, has suffered a semantic drift, vide infra.)
________
TLDR; Fascist is not a useful term for Germany during WWII because, firstly, it is not accurate and, secondly, the semantic drift in contemporary culture has eroded what use it still has; it has become a word used to describe anyone who is hated. Just like Putin uses "Nazi" to describe anyone he determines is "anti-Russia", since their Great Patriotic War was against the Germans in what the rest of the globe calls WWII, so that he suffers no cognitive turbulence labelling a Jewish man (Volodymyr Zelenskyy) as a Nazi in an effort to explain his current invasion of Ukraine.
- An edit summary might have helped... Adakiko (talk) 07:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not completely across all of the functionality of wikipedia, so mea culpa. I'll look into that feature. 14.202.66.248 (talk) 07:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't have much investment in the article, please feel free to change it again. You could copy this to talk:Herbert Marcuse. Then use "See talk page regarding edit." help:Edit summary See help:talk pages and wp:talk page guidelines. It might help make communication easier if you get an wp:account. Not sure if you are going to read this or not. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 08:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ “Scholars of fascism do not agree on what fascism means; nor, for that matter, do fascist scholars.” Dominic Green (The Atlantic, 2016), "The Elusive Definition of 'Fascist'"
- ^ "Like the communists, the fascists were radically unprincipled opportunists, contemptuous of democratic norms. They sought to overthrow the right-left format of democratic politics, and their ideology combined elements of both." Ibidem.
I did provide a source. Please pay attention.
BTW, the source comes from the article on Origin of the domestic Dog. --84.132.144.110 (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, you did not. Add the citation on Oberkassel, Bonn, not some vague reference to another article. Adakiko (talk) 03:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- What was vague about that? Just click on the title.
- Ok then, I made the reference inline. --84.132.144.110 (talk) 04:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I give up. You successfully defended the article against new information. Congratulation! --84.132.144.110 (talk) 06:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Recent Edits
Hi there, i have removed the edits done by Throast and popski because they are malicious and defimitory. This is to settle score with Ryan because of a lawsuit again Ethan Klein of H3 podcast (Throast). They had contracted me with trolling him which i feel is not right. Kindly revert my changes. H2H3fanbase2TP (talk) 08:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Ryan's Page edits.
Hi, i have made some edits which you have reverted. I don't understand why this the case. H2H3fanbase2TP (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- @H2H3fanbase2TP: As the article and my wp:edit summary states: discuss on the talk page and gett wp:Consensus before making such a change. See wp:BRD. Adakiko (talk) 09:31, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Budget
Please remove the butt crack 2603:6011:6224:1800:9531:335F:D37F:EA4F (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
- The problem was vandalism on template:Turkish lira. I undid your edit to diagnose the problem. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)