User talk:Wildfireupdateman

License tagging for File:Pyrocumulus BoiseFire.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pyrocumulus BoiseFire.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of fire behaviors moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of fire behaviors, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'm new to this article creation thing and I was wondering how to save changes without publishing Wildfireupdateman (talk) 02:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of wildfire behaviors has been accepted

List of wildfire behaviors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Any tips to make the article better? Wildfireupdateman (talk) 18:52, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WRP 2001 Chisholm-Smoke.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WRP 2001 Chisholm-Smoke.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tornado outbreak of June 8, 1995

I noticed you started a new tornado outbreak article. I wanted to say that I've made a template for a generic template that touches on all the main points of a more in-depth tornado article to speed up the creation of my own (and hopefully other's) creation of outbreak articles. If you decide to use it, see User:GeorgeMemulous/Generic tornado outbreak and copy that into the article. Cheers! GeorgeMemulous (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Chisholm fire. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chisholm fire has been accepted

Chisholm fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I change the title to "Chisholm Fire" to fit WPWILDFIRE conventions? Wildfireupdateman (talk) 15:27, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tornado outbreak of June 8, 1995 has been accepted

Tornado outbreak of June 8, 1995, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 05:05, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Typhoon" Kong-rey

Hello, I saw you changing the Japan Meteorological Agency winds to 75kt, which I don't think is the proper one. As of revision 18z of 2024-10-28, JMA still considers the storm as an "STS", more-so a severe tropical storm. Here is the latest revision found here:

WTPQ51 RJTD 281800
RSMC TROPICAL CYCLONE ADVISORY
NAME STS (here is it, severe tropical storm) 2421 KONG-REY (2421)

If you want to do this in the future, please get the winds from the section "PSTN", which is the present. The other sections are for probable wind evaluations. This is the same with the JTWC (Joint Typhoon Warning Center), within the section "Present Wind Distribution". I'm sorry if you already know this, but I just want to give you a tip you can probably use in the future. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience. I was using the map on https://www.jma.go.jp/bosai/map.html#5/23.665/123.97/&elem=root&typhoon=TC2427&contents=typhoon&lang=en and didn't realize that we could only use advisories. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we can use anything by the JMA and the JTWC, though the advisories are more efficient. I didn't know a map was present too, sorry for my inconvenience. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 04:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacks on Blender

Rollbacks are a user privelage that you need to apply for, it's not something immediately available to an editor. Twinkle has a lot of similar tools that do effectively the same thing, it's really useful to use if you find yourself needing to revert vandalism or other unconstructive edits. LaffyTaffer (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the insight! Was reverting vandalism for the first time in a while, and wondered if there was a tool that made it easier to revert multiple edits at a time. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle is my tool of choice, but there's a lot of other ones out there. There's a list over at WP:AVT that you can browse through to pick one you prefer. :) LaffyTaffer (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]