Talk:National Assembly of Pakistan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Assembly of Pakistan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

nadeem malik

what is it about nadeem malik being next pres.xcxcx\ what is the

i thought prez. is musharraf and he has no plans to step down. nids 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new

pls sum1 add the new elections results table —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imadaqu93 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For election results please visit these articles List of Pakistan National Assembly Seats Elections in Pakistan Pakistani general election, 2008 and for Constituencies list visit this page Constituencies of Pakistan Tariq.Imran ^Talk

Landowners

The article should address the fact that many MNA's are landowners with vast estates and that often that there is not a choice for the poor residents of these estates to vote any other way but the way dictated by the landowning family.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sublimeport (talk • contribs) 21:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please its my humble request that make a separate article for list of all Committees of national assembly because this is page taking too much time to load on slow internet connections... and also remove the table for election results 2008 because results are already published under these articles Elections in Pakistan Pakistani general election, 2008 thank you... Tariq.Imran ^Talk —Preceding undated comment added 13:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

There has been an April 2013 Merger Proposal made requesting the following articles: 1st National Assembly of Pakistan, 3rd National Assembly of Pakistan, 4th National Assembly of Pakistan, 7th National Assembly of Pakistan, 8th National Assembly of Pakistan, 9th National Assembly of Pakistan, 10th National Assembly of Pakistan, and 11th National Assembly of Pakistan all be merged into the National Assembly (Pakistan) article or the History of Pakistan National Assembly.

Additional input regarding both proposals should be made below, in this section. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 02:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on National Assembly of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Assembly of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PTI has 158 seats

Hi. Whoever added the seat change for the PTI, reducing it to 152, I’ve seen many sources, and all sources and news outlets say that PTI has 158 seats, and this is the only source that reduced the PTI seats. If you could kindly explain to me the reasoning behind all this, that’ll be great. Thanks! Wbhai89 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Parliament's and political status is not clear in Pakistan since the start of 2022 Pakistani constitutional crisis, The matter is in supreme court but this user:Zk911912 continuously removing content from article. Please don't allow any edits on this page until situation goes clear. 103.141.159.74 (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Ok but please restore recent removal of content by the user:Zk911912.

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

National Assembly of Pakistan has been restored by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, So kindly please restore my version of "Revision as of 10:21, 3 April 2022".

Source: ^[1]^[2]103.141.159.74 (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done Jibran1998 (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

There is no opposition in the National Assembly, all the combined opposition resigned except 1 seat of GDA. The rest are the parties in alliance with government under the nane of PDM (Pakistan Democratic Alliance). Please make corrections. The PTI members shown in opposition are are theoretically disqualified under Article 63A of constitution of Pakistan for violating Party decisions. So mark them as independent or may be under PDM. Kindly make following corrections. 120.17.182.41 (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MNA or not ??

I have big question about MNA's of Pakistan. Are they representative of the people of Islamic republic of Pakistan or the representative of their party. As court said they are de-seat. Because they didn't follow the party policy. Yes court is right at a perspective that is they have been elected as a party member and got a ticket and have won the election in the face of party not in their own face. But real question is that are they representative of people or are they representative of their Party. If they are they face of people not they party so why are they de-seated. I am not a PML(N) supporter and nor a PTI supporter. Basic of mine is that are MNA's of Pakistan are the representative of people and if yes soo are they the representative of their more than the people. Pls I want an answer 111.88.193.168 (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is space is only to talk about how to improve the Wikipedia article, I’ll answer your question, an MNA represents the people of their constituency, but yeah this place is only for talking about Wikipedia, not a question space :) Titan2456 (talk) 16:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2018 election in Pakistan results

D 37.111.135.114 (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seats

@Muzzzmuzzmuzzz and SheriffIsInTown: according to the rule, the seats will be given to PTI, not to SIC. Panam2014 (talk) 21:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s best to wait until the NA website updates the party labels for each MNA. Muzzzmuzzmuzzz (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with @Muzzzmuzzmuzzz Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 00:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muzzzmuzzmuzzz and SheriffIsInTown: Government decided to file a review because the rulling called independents MP as PTI, but government claims they belongs to SIC and vowed to disqualifie them. Panam2014 (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll also update the NA diagram accordingly Titan2456 (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwqwer: It was discussed and agreed here that seat distribution would not be updated until it is reflected on the NA website. So why do you keep changing it repeatedly despite different editors asking you not to? Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They have also done this to every provincial assembly. Titan2456 (talk) 01:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muzzzmuzzmuzzz, SheriffIsInTown, and Titan2456: SC recognized only 38 MP as members of PTI. See here. Panam2014 (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Muzzzmuzzmuzzz and SheriffIsInTown: ECP have authority to notifie affiliation, not NA website. And 118 seats for SIC is false. Panam2014 (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ECP will obviously work with the NA website. Titan2456 (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So yeah, if there is an update from either one we should add it. Titan2456 (talk) 01:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliation

@Titan2456 The National Assembly website lists 80 members of the SIC. Additionally, there is a source confirming that the National Assembly secretariat removed PTI members from the assembly following amendments to the Election Act. The decision by the Supreme Court of Pakistan is now outdated and no longer applicable, as the authority responsible for recognizing affiliations is the National Assembly secretariat. During the vote on election amendments, all major media outlets reported 80 members of the SIC, with no PTI members included. You cannot simply remove the most recent sources and replace them with outdated information and sources. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a source for this other than the NA website, which has not been updated. Titan2456 (talk) 23:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.geo.tv/amp/410037-back-to-april-3-supreme-court-declares-deputy-speakers-ruling-null-and-void-restores-national-assembly

[2] ttps://www.dailypakistan.com.pk/07-Apr-2022/supreme-court-restores-pakistan-s-national-assembly-terms-deputy-speaker-s-ruling-unconstitutional%3fversion=amp

[1]

[2]