User talk:xDanielx

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

RFA Thanks

Click there to open your card! → → →

Dearest XDanielx,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat, Wizardman, and Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.

Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.

Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin

Click there to open your card! → → →

My dear Wikipedian XDanielx,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.

Carlosguitar

Credits

This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.

This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.

Re: Arch Coal logo

Hello, XDanielx. You have new messages at Mendaliv's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover \| Feature \| News and announcements \| Humor \| Want ads
To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi XDanielx. Thank you for your work on Alessandro Chiesa. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is no proof of notability. In general assistant and associate professors do not pass WP:NPROF unless there are major awards or something else.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: thanks for reviewing.

Chiesa's bio mentions some awards, but I don't really have enough context to know whether they're significant enough to contribute to NPROF, and/or to be worth covering in the article. Maybe the first two? Please let me know if you have input on that, though I realize you're in a different field. My work has been recognized by an IEEE SP Test-of-Time Award (2024), a Sloan Research Fellowship (2021), an Okawa Foundation Research Grant (2020), a nomination in MIT's TR35 (2018), and Google Faculty Research Awards (2018 and 2017).

Chiesa also has around 10k citations. ~150 cryptographers have more than that, but 10k is among the highest the relatively new (but IMO significant) subfield of zero-knowledge proofs. Some of Chiesa's works are considered foundational there, e.g.

Zerocash - the basis of Zcash, arguably the first real application of zero-knowledge proofs
SNARKs for C - the first zkVM, which led to a new subfield with various zkVM designs (Cairo, Jolt, etc) and implementations
Interactive oracle proofs - the basic framework that most modern zero-knowledge protocols follow
Zexe, which became the blockchain Aleo (no article, probably falls short of GNG but it's well-known in the industry)

I thought Chiesa's citations and co-founder roles might already suffice for NPROF, but if you don't think so, I'd welcome your thoughts on what the strongest case might be (awards, impact of certain papers, business roles) so that I can focus on that. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 16:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His h-factor is on the edge, so you need additional things. I do not think co-founder is part of Wikipedia:NPROF, although you could post to Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics) about that.

For certain Sloan, Okawa, Google are important, but not that notable junior awards -- although they should be mentioned to strengthen the case. (Many people do not realize that the Sloan is really a grant even though the name is different.) The nomination is not that important and I am not sure about including it as it could appear to be peacock The IEEE is the best I would say.

For the others, to demonstrate that his work is "foundational" you have to find an independent review paper (or similar) that extensively states that. It is not enough for you to say it, it has to be a reputable secondary source. (I am not doubting the truth of your statements, just saying that you have to proveit.) Ldm1954 (talk) 18:49, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback, I made some changes accordingly. Am I understanding you right that impact would ideally be demonstrated by explicit remarks about impactfulness in reviews, surveys, etc? I don't think much of that exists in this field, perhaps since it's a young field where everyone is focused on novel problems. If it would help, I could add more secondary sources which substantially discuss and build on Chiesa's works, but without explicit language about impact.

Unless you have a different recommendation, I'll probably move to mainspace soon. If it does end up at AfD, I'll search some more for any secondary sources that might help demonstrate impact, but I might not find much so citations might end up being the main consideration. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 17:43, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you move it to mainspace now it should be almost immediately be tagged as having major problems. A critical issue is that you have not provided any sources for his awards. As written these should all be deleted, and do not be surprised if someone does. Furthermore none of your references are properly formatted, for instance 5 should be

Ben Sasson, Eli; Chiesa, Alessandro; Garman, Christina; Green, Matthew; Miers, Ian; Tromer, Eran; Virza, Madars (2014). "Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin". 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. IEEE. doi:10.1109/sp.2014.36.

Since I moved this to draft, if you submit to AfC other will comment and give you a third chance. If you go directly to main all they can do is either delete all the inappropriate material and/or go directly to AfD. It is unlikely that you will be given a chance to improve as people will read the history. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

N.B., if you are unclear about what can happen see this. The editor who removed it all was following Wikipedia rules. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I'll at least look for sources for the awards. I'll have a look at the incomplete references also, though to be fair that's quite common and not usually considered a reason to remove content. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 20:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Chiesa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alessandro Chiesa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and see talk page comments about notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and antisemitism

I've edited the Wikipedia and antisemitism article a fair amount today, including restructuring it. Obviously still needs work, but I'm taking a break from it. If you or anyone you know is so inclined, it'd be great if you'd improve it further. ProfGray (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the good work on it! The updated structure is nice. I'll try to help fleshing it out in the coming days. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 21:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While we are waiting for the Merge discussion to be closed, perhaps you and I can discuss the potential renaming of the article. One idea would be to collaboratively write a Talk post that would survey Wikipedians with a few possible names. This might avoid going thru a series of Move discussions. It could include some discussion of criteria and pro/con on options. Thoughts? ProfGray (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like the idea although I'm starting to think the current title might be suitable. Since we cover a mix of well-established and just suspected antisemitism, it seems like there are reasonable objections to Allegations of antisemitism on Wikipedia for being overly qualified, and I expect we'd see similar objections to Antisemitism on Wikipedia for lacking qualifications. Maybe Wikipedia and antisemitism is a reasonable middle ground, since it's vague enough to capture both well-established and suspected antisemitism.

Maybe we could separately consider possible alternatives to "antisemitism", like "anti-Jewish bias" which to me seems broader, capturing biases that are not rooted in hate. Maybe it's a bit wordy though.

Are there some other options you think might work well? — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 23:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alessandro Chiesa (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more independent sources that mention the subject in-depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alessandro Chiesa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XDanielx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]