Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Milton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Title

[edit]

Correct me if I am wrong; but don’t we normally include the year in the title (eg: Tropical Storm Milton (2024))? Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:02, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I'm pretty sure we normally do. SillyNerdo (talk) 18:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Except when it is the first time a name has been used, as in this instance. See, for example, this year's Hurricane Francine. Drdpw (talk) 18:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those only apply to storm names that are not notable enough to not have the year in their title or have only been used once. ZZZ'S 18:51, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which, I’m only speculating; and I know that we’re not a crystal ball; but if this hits Florida at the intensity it’s expected to hit; this will end up being the only “Hurricane Milton” that we see. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 21:42, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That, and its also doing a Hurricane Otis as well, explosive rapid intensification into (more than likely) a Category 5 hurricane.
So yeah, this will most likely be the only "Hurricane Milton" that will be named. Accordthemusician (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One major difference. They knew yesterday that the models were indicating possible category 5 intensity. That was 18+ hours ago. They didn’t know about Otis becoming a cat-5 until about six hours prior to landfall. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redraftify?

[edit]

Could we redraftify the article until Milton actually does tangible damages so that I can beef up the article more. ✶Quxyz 20:49, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to it. Maybe wait until it passes the Yucatán and then republish. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 21:37, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which I mean; I checked the history, it says Hurricanehink was the one who published it; he probably has a reason for going ahead and publishing it, he’s been doing this for close to 20 years. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 21:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Though it is a developing and incomplete article for sure, I see no compelling reason to temporarily redraftify it. Serious preparations are currently underway in Florida, and the storm will most probably have serious impacts there in just a couple of days. We can build the article in main space just as well as in draft. Drdpw (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only real reason to draftify here would be on notability, which Milton has already established from all the preparations. The quality is just fine as it is and can only get better. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 01:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think given the fact that this is already a category 5; the notability issue is kinda a moot point anyway. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 19:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we use "Exposively Intensify" instead of "Rapidly Intensify"

[edit]

Good morning, fellow Wikipedians. I have a question regarding the lead of this article. Shouldn't we use "explosively intensifying system" instead of "rapidly intensifying system," given that the storm's wind speed increased by around 90 mph in just 24 hours? Yesterday at this time, it was 60 mph, and now it's at 150 mph. TheWxResearcher (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category 5 in 10 hours from Cat 1

[edit]

Is this a new record for rapid intensification? 2605:8D80:324:29D1:2D01:49C6:D87D:6368 (talk) 15:29, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think so Accordthemusician (talk) 15:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is not yet officially C5. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Huh. Now it is... However, wait until reliable sources cover this prior to inclusion. Tavantius (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well that was quick. Agree with above comment though. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any records must be verified before being added to the article. An NHC advisory from 2 hours ago confirmed it was the third quickest in the Atlantic basin behind Wilma and Felix; now that it's a category 5, we might see it reported at the next NHC bulletin or, failing that, third-party reporting. Something like this would be easily sensationalized if it's real so there shouldn't be a problem confirming or denying it after the dust settles. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 16:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As of 11:55AM EDT; Milton is now a category 5. But for future reference @Wildfireupdateman is right on this. This is WP:NOTAFORUM. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: This article from WVUE-TV, a Fox affiliate, states Milton now matches Wilma's record; however, I'd wait for better sources before adding this claim. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And plus; Wilma was stronger. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which AccuWeather would be reliable for something like this. So long as it isn’t a damage estimate or a forecast. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NHC website unavailable

[edit]

The NHC website is currently unavailable. If it remains that way at 8:00pm EDT, how should we update the max winds? Tavantius (talk) 22:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we don’t; we leave things as they are until the site is back up and running or the information is relayed by another reliable secondary source. Drdpw (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The NHC site is working fine for me. It doesn't shock me, though, that in a historic and deadly situation like this that intermittent service outages will occur. Whoever can get on of the editors on this page will edit it to reflect current information, and if not, there's no deadline and information can be added when it can be accessed by the greater public. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that same problem. 503 service unavailable. Probably too many people visiting the website. Same effect as a “denial of service” attack, only unintentional and likely not malicious. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please don’t use the link to the current advisory page when citing. Use the archived version, or in my case, I manually type in the advisory number. Even if it shows a 503 error for a couple minutes; it’s better than having the citation being rendered moot three hours later. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 00:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some Damage done

[edit]

Currently the hurricane is sitting over the Yucatán, however when it intensified into a category five hurricane in inflicted damage over northern Yucatán. This is not supported by any proof, but I predict that there is damage done. I’d say around 1 million or less so far. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:DD62:5768:A509:74A0 (talk) 22:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid speculation on the talk page. If you have anything to contribute to the article, please add it with proper sources. Wikipedia is not a forum. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remember that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, and you should not publish anything that cannot be backed up with a credible source. Mitsuba Sousuke :3 (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"This is not supported by any proof" and you have closed your own argument before it was finished. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 22:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not a guess, It’s true, look at Milton over the area 2601:58A:8880:4A90:DD62:5768:A509:74A0 (talk) 22:34, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sources, please. ArkHyena (it/its) 22:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photo I added earlier that was removed

[edit]

Howdy, I'm not too pressed if it stays in the article and I looked through the revision history, but there have been well over 50 edits since then and none reference removing an image. The image was placed in the preparations subsection for Florida and I took it at my local Walmart as an example of people buying up supplies ahead of Milton and I'm just curious if anyone thinks it is worthy of being re-added. Keep in mind that Avon Park is away from the coast, but it is covered by a hurricane warning. An identical photo from a Tampa Bay area Walmart would be more justifiable than this photo's inclusion. Thanks, and again I'm not pressed if its excluded, but it could be worthy of inclusion at least at this point.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Water_bottles_wiped_clean_at_Avon_Park_Walmart_ahead_of_Hurricane_Milton.jpg Raskuly (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the photo that was added about the emergency shoulder use, but please reference why you're removing something like an image in your edit description. Raskuly (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Helene, Ian, and Idalia to see also?

[edit]

Forgive me if these requests are too early, but might I suggest eventually adding Hurricane Helene, Hurricane Ian, and possibly Hurricane Idalia to see also?

  1. Helene - Obvious choice for impacting the region that Milton is threatening less than two weeks before Milton
  2. Ian - Also impacted similar region that Milton is threatening
  3. Idalia - Also impacted similar region that Milton is threatening

Again, these requests are probably too early, but these might be good additions for the article in the coming days. Mitsuba Sousuke :3 (talk) 22:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think that’s a great idea in my opinion. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But I do think it should wait until landfall. I think also adding Milton to the see also on those storms’ articles will be appropriate too; at least for Hurricane Ian anyway. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
too soon to say, as Milton is still active. I would say probably not Helene, as it is mentioned and linked-to within the article a couple times already. Drdpw (talk) 22:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we should be adding storms with similar paths and/or intensities only. ZZZ'S 23:02, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Concur, systems that formed the Gulf and traversed the Florida peninsula W to E (presuming that is its course), and Cat4/5 Florida peninsula hurricanes. Drdpw (talk) 23:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should add Joaquin (2015). Reason : Joaquin and Milton both stalled in a certain place to achieve is peak intensity. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:DD62:5768:A509:74A0 (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. I do not believe we should add hurricanes that did not make a similar path nor intensity. Joaquin did not peak as a Category 5, was not in the same body of water, had a completely different track, and affected different areas with different magnitudes. ZZZ'S 23:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don’t get it though, place DOES NOT matter, they both did similar behavior, which was that they stalled. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:DD62:5768:A509:74A0 (talk) 23:08, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think Helene can be added as it is already mentioned in the prose. Idalia's definitely out of the way in my opinion.
See the following:
Just a few I think are similar enough to earn a See Also spot. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yeah i could see wilma on there since both of those are kind of similar imo. SillyNerdo (talk) 00:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I’d say Rita and maybe Gilbert should also have a see also spot. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:24, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Especially if the Rita mention ends up getting removed. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Add Joaquin, Both storms have stalled 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So did Dorian and Harvey. Joaquin was weaker and made no threat to land. Besides, Milton didn't stall to intensify to anything beyond a tropical storm. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 11:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hurricane Joaquin - Stayed in a certain area for several hours/days just like Milton at Category 4 Strength 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Milton didn't stall at category 4 strength, though? GeorgeMemulous (talk) 11:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Technically yes and no. It started stalling when it became a category 3. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read what I said. ZZZ'S 11:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I mean is that Joaquin did, not Milton. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:49, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Whoever pointed out Rita’s mentioning, I do agree because Rita is the hurricane with the lowest pressure in the gulf, right on top of Milton. According to Accuweather’s Source 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That would be me. I pointed out Rita; but Rita is also already mentioned in the article itself. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 18:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Helene should be added, Reason: Milton is impacting Florida in about 2 - 3 weeks prior 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 11:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Already mentioned in lead. ZZZ'S 11:54, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's already in the prose. Per MOS:SEEALSO: As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body. And also, as Zzzs said,

I believe we should be adding storms with similar paths and/or intensities rather than intensity.

Joaquin didn't do that. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 11:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn’t there a good example but it’s weak. Mindy (2021). Took a similar track through the Gulf of Mexico at a Weaker intensity. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Milton Regained Category 5 Status. This is a serious problem. Now the landfall is expected to be deadlier. 2601:58A:8880:4A90:211D:2D14:DC65:5287 (talk) 12:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How many people did Joaquin kill in the Southeastern US? It's not a good comparison. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 12:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not adding any of these storms based on forecast as that is a violation of WP:CRYSTALBALL. Wait until it happens first. ChessEric 17:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's at least an argument for Wilma, due to their shared intensity and both affecting the Yucatan. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think Wilma would be appropriate to add now. mitsuwah (he/him) (talk) 17:43, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keyword expected, not has. SirMemeGod17:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not Joaquin – not analogous; not Wilma – mentioned and hyperlinked multiple times in the article. Drdpw (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It did not regain Category 5 status. Right now it's at high-end Cat 4 strength. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 18:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a stupid question but should I add Hurricane Otis in the See Also section, they both ERI'ed into a cat 5 hurricane. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 18:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Drdpw (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alright! just asking before I did something that I wasn't sure about ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 18:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also think Dorian should be added unless it’s already mentioned in the article because Dorian was the last Atlantic hurricane to have wind speeds similar to/greater than Milton. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 October 2024

[edit]

The barometric pressure has officially dropped below 899 Mbar as stated by NOAA Tornadosully (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No it has not. The latest update from 4 PM Central Time states Milton is still at 905. Mitsuba Sousuke :3 (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We will know in about 10 minutes. I or someone else can update it if it goes down. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 23:53, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Ok the NHC has just updated. See 8pm advisory (please don’t revert!). Down to 897. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 23:56, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moot now. @Tornadosully, in the future, please format your requests in a "I request 'example content example content' to be changed to 'example content addition example content', and here's why". This is the standard format for edit requests and is crystal clear as to what you want done. Also, some editors may ignore or close your request if it is improperly formatted. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the hurricane cone forecast maps?

[edit]

We used to show the NHC hurricane cone maps in our hurricane articles. These allow one to see the timing forcasts for when & where to expect the winds/precipitation of various levels. Like this for Milton now.

As it stands, the article is really short on info of when the hurricane makes landfall on the Florida coast. But the cone maps shows it is after 7pm ET on Friday, 11 October. Odd that is not in the article, or this cone map isn't. N2e (talk) 03:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1229957783#Editors_removing_formatted_citations_for_bare_URL_citations and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_June_19#Tropical_cyclone_current_storm_templates for why cones and the warning table templates that you may have been familiar with in past years were binned. Boils down to a WP:MOS related edit/revert war earlier this year that spilled onto ANI, and "liability". ConCompS talk 03:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That is a super helpful reply. Hate to see Wikipedia go backwards, and have less good articles, but I get how our institutions (including Common Law and weird liability outcomes by juries against those centralized entities with capturable assets) have negatively reshaped other industries as well. N2e (talk) 04:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change effects

[edit]

My text on the impact of climate change on this hurricane has been deleted. It read: “ The storm has been fueled by climate change. Record-high surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico and higher moisture in the atmosphere caused by global warming have enabled the formation of the hurricane and its rapid intensification.[1][2] Sea level rise, also caused by climate change, may potentially make the storm more destructive.[3]“ This is true and sourced, and should be kept in. It should also be mentioned in the lead, which I had written but was also deleted. If you want, I can source it even more. Personisinsterest (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say wait before re-adding as the storm is still active. Once more study is done into it, we'll have a better and less sensationalized / editorialized answer. I saw your edits, and they were just as assertive as their sources, stating their headlines as facts without attributing them to the publishers, which seems a little too WP:WIKIVOICE in my opinion. Not that I doubt it's true. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
People need to know that this isn’t normal, that it’s exacerbated by climate change and scientists agree. Personisinsterest (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why do they need to know that? 173.167.141.141 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hurricane_Beryl/Archive_1#Climate_change_connection - relevant discussion
I wouldn't add it for now as it would have to be added to every modern storm as all of them are affected by climate change. I would consider it if research papers are published specifically talking about this storm. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 15:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's normal that tropical systems do rapidly strengthen and sometimes explosively intensify but no tropical systems in this area had took the environment. Hopefully this will be a one time system and no other system does the same for the rest of the season. ModdiWX (You Got Mail!) 18:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Hurricane Milton's rapid intensification is part of a climate-fueled trend". MSNBC. Retrieved October 8, 2024.
  2. ^ "Why experts are so scared of Hurricane Milton". The Hill. Retrieved October 8, 2024.
  3. ^ "With Hurricane Milton, climate change is a key factor". Axios. Retrieved October 8, 2024.

Any news...

[edit]

About the Scorpion Reef? Right in the path of Milton. This should be added (here and on that page) if/when any referenceable information becomes available. An Important Bird Area, and one of the islets (Isla Pérez) in it has a lighthouse and a few houses. - MPF (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no sources about scorpion reef for now. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell, Isla Perez is very, very sparsely inhabited and has no permanent population, so it's not a stretch to imagine everyone there would have been swiftly evacuated. As for impacts on the island itself, Milton was a small storm in terms of windfield (especially in contrast to last month's Helene) so I don't expect any major impacts, despite its relatively close pass at historic intensity. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It still could've been damaged by storm surge. Keep it in mind when researching impacts in Mexico. Raskuly (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wildfireupdateman, GeorgeMemulous, and Raskuly: Thanks all! Yes, I don't expect there will be any information yet, but when it does eventually become available, it would be valuable to add it (perhaps more at the location pages, than the Hurricane Milton page?). And yes, it is the storm surge flooding that is likely the most important; perhaps even erosion enough to leave the islands permanently below high tide levels? - MPF (talk) 22:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Umm guys, we just dropped to 902mb. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/refresh/MIATCPAT4+shtml/082053.shtml; don’t cite that link, cite the archived version Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 00:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pings to @GeorgeMemulous, @MPF, @Raskuly, @Wildfireupdateman. You should probably look at this. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 00:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTAFORUM. This has little to do with Isla Perez and Scorpion Reef and this isn't even Milton's strongest phase so far. I doubt by now that another editor hasn't already added it to the meteorological synopsis. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 00:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2024: Correct hyphens to dashes

[edit]

In § Florida, please fix the hyphens in the Amreak schedule changes to en-dashes. That is, change the text from

Amtrak suspended its Silver Service between Jacksonville and Miami from October 7-11 and cancelled the Auto Train from October 8-10.

to

Amtrak suspended its Silver Service between Jacksonville and Miami from October 7–11 and cancelled the Auto Train from October 8–10.

Thank you! 97.102.205.224 (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done In Special:Diff/1250126127. Thanks for being MOS-observant. Sam Sailor 16:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dog rescued from river

[edit]

This article documents a dog being saved from a river. Is it worth it to be mentioned? I do know that there was a man saved during Francine that saw a lot of coverage but that's comparing apples and oranges. ✶Quxyz 20:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No lasting notability for this specific event in the larger scheme of things. Drdpw (talk) 20:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2024

[edit]

Sentence requesting to edit: "Milton then weakened down to Category 4 strength due to an eyewall replacement cycle" with paragraph ending. The storm has since regained its former Category 5 status, which should be included either within or following this line. The original sentence seems as if it remains a Cat 4. Sad bleep (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2024 (2)

[edit]

Wind speeds still listed as being 180mph and pressure 897 mbs, while the most updated information states that it is sitting at 165mph and 905 mb, respectively. Need to change this as the next update will not be until 1+ hours from now. Sad bleep (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for not citing sources. This is according to the National Hurricane Center and the information that is being broadcasted by major networks, such as The Weather Channel and Bay News 9. Sad bleep (talk) 22:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The wind/MSLP listed in the infobox is maximum winds and lowest MSLP, not current winds/MSLP. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 22:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should maybe update that statement to  Partly done: on account of the fact that the meteorological history section has been updated to reflect the changes. And ps. I cited reliable sources. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing this out, my apologies. Sad bleep (talk) 23:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"4th strongest hurricane ever recorded by pressure on this side of the world"

[edit]

A professional meteorologist described this hurricane as such, do we have perhaps a better source for this claim to be able to add or is this tweet somehow worthwhile to add maybe as a professional's reaction? Akaibu (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know where he pulled that claim from. Milton isn't even the 4th-strongest Atlantic hurricane by recorded pressure per the table on this article (4th-strongest would be Rita). ArkHyena (it/its) 00:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wind speed adjustment

[edit]

the windspeed has been found to be 159 knots, which translates to 182.974 i suggest that someone changes the windspeed to either 182 or 183 mph. source: https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/text/MIAREPNT2.shtml at the bottom is says max fl wind 159 kts. Hurricaneman500 (talk) 23:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it doesnt say it anymore since the data has been updated but it did Hurricaneman500 (talk) 23:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Hurricaneman500: The NHC generally reduces flight-level winds by around 10% to get surface wind estimates (though mileage can vary from storm-to-storm), which in this case would yield ~143.1 knots, or 164.7081 mph, in line with the NHC's 7pm update. We also need to rely on the NHC's advisories (or tropical cyclone reports, once they're published), as they are the official source for information on the storm's winds and pressure. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 00:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok Hurricaneman500 (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]