User talk:JAFactsDude

February 2024

Hello, I'm ZombiUwU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sheridan, Texas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 00:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry it was not constructive. It was my second edit so I’m still learning. Thank you. JAFactsDude (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my mistake that I warned you for vandalism, I made a misclick when using wp:AntiVandal. I reinstated your edit but please make sure to cite sources. Sorry! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 00:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you. I will practice more and sight sources. JAFactsDude (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright! If you need any help let me know! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 00:49, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi JAFactsDude! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 04:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

forgot to do this :) ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 04:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roblox BedWars (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothytyy was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Roblox BedWars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothytyy (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JAFactsDude! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Timothytyy (talk) 05:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for your good edits adding links, like at Washington County and Dennis! It looks like you are getting a handle on editing, which is great! Fritzmann (message me) 23:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Splashway Waterpark and Campground (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Heavy usage on unreliable sources (the subject's website).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Splashway Waterpark and Campground and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roblox BedWars

Hello, JAFactsDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roblox BedWars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roblox BedWars

Hello, JAFactsDude. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Roblox BedWars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Splashway Waterpark and Campground

Hello, JAFactsDude. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Splashway Waterpark and Campground, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Isaac (2024) (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir MemeGod was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All (with one exception) references point to NOAA's website, which shows that at this time I don't see it meeting our general notability guidelines. Good work on the media and infobox though, that looks really good. Before submitting, I'd suggest running back over the article to check for spelling mistakes, and try to find some more sources. Thanks! :)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hurricane Isaac (2024) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir MemeGod  12:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just a heads up, but Isaac probably doesn't need an article, since it barely affected anyone. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it ended up being a good draft would it be accepted anyways or just declined because it wasn’t as important JAFactsDude (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it gets accepted, there's a very good chance it would end up getting merged eventually. Every storm is notable enough to be on Wikipedia, that's why we have the season articles. But if there isn't a lot of additional content than what's already in the storm section, then it'll probably get merged. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the tropical cyclone WikiProject!

Hey there, I saw you decided to join the WPTC. Welcome! I see you worked on storms from this year, such as Isaac, so I'm guessing you're most interested in Atlantic storms? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:52, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi! Yes, I love tracking tropical cyclones. I track the Atlantic the most, and EPAC the second most. Sometimes I’ll track the WPAC and I’ll almost never track any other basins. JAFactsDude (talk) 18:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, there's plenty to worry about just with the Atlantic and Pacific! I'm guessing you prefer more modern storms. What aspect of editing are you most interested in? Fixing vandalism or typos? Or perhaps writing/expanding articles? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure, I’m interested in things like weather, maps, history, geography, etc JAFactsDude (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in history, then there are a lot of interesting articles that you might want to check out. For example, List of Category 5 Atlantic hurricanes, but also List of Category 4 Atlantic hurricanes, and Cat 3, and so on. You might notice that not all of the articles look the same. The first one, for Category 5's, is a featured list. It is properly cited and has all of the info that you would expect, such as the impacts and the landfalls. In the Category 4 list, there is the landfall table, but no mention of impacts. So, that could be a project for example, helping improve that. Or, if you're more interested in storms in a particular area, there are articles like List of California hurricanes, List of Florida hurricanes, and List of North Carolina hurricanes. You might notice that they're all featured, but if you click on the Florida one, then you might see that the most recent list - List of Florida hurricanes (2000–present) - is not featured. It was featured at one point, but the more recent storms weren't getting properly cited, so the article fell behind. These are just a few examples, and I don't want to force you to do anything. The best part about Wikipedia is that it's totally volunteer based, and you can do things at your own pace! Lemme know if you have questions. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JAFactsDude, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, by the way, I think you’ve been through a lot. I’ll be glad to help you any way! 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know I’ve been through a lot… JAFactsDude (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just do. I’ve been with you before, and you haven’t known it yet. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You saw me during my dark and terrible side. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really confused here. JAFactsDude (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m HurricaneKirk2024. I changed my name later on to change my identity from a bad editor to a good editor (with a bad past). 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, makes sense! I with the way you are now I can’t even tell that’s you! JAFactsDude (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you again! 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

or rather, hear from you again. 🍋 🍋(talk!) 17:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Hi, JAFactsDude! I have been watching your edits for a bit and I have noticed that you have removed a lot of my redlinks. Specifically, I have reverted this edit. Please note that redlinks are only to be removed if the subject of the redlink is unencyclopedic. Punta Castilla and Bermejo River are likely to be notable due to the low requirements at WP:NGEO. NEMO is likely to be encyclopedic too as it is a national governmental agency. Thanks, ✶Qux yz ✶ 03:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]