User talk:N2e

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

A dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jackzhp#September_2020

User:WhoKnows (talk) 22:28, 31 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject SpaceX

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are please add support on it proposal page. @N2e:

Nomination for Deletion

Tesla cybercab

Part of the reaons here is that so often Musk is making stuff up regarding timelines. So, this isn't like GM saying something is going into production by next year and of course it actually does. But noting that Musk is saying this, so this isn't some kind of corporate committment, but just him saying stuff.... --ZimZalaBim ^talk 04:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search.
Interested in taking part? Sign up here.

You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla as a source?

Hi @N2e:

I guess you think Tesla site

https://www.tesla.com/NACS

cited on top of the table is not a valid source for

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Supercharger

NACS adoption timeline

"...citation at the top of a table section is always out of date and fails to cover many subsequent edits..."

That's the whole point. Tesla grants access to 5 companies currently. We need to check with Tesla's source on top of the table against the other 5 companies to see whether there's any discrepancy. Tamnguyenrn (talk) 22:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are talking about User:Tamnguyenrn. Can you provide the name of the article and some specific edit.

Obviously, Tesla can be a source. But the problem with that primary source, especially at the "top of the table" as you said, could be many things. Perhaps it not easily verifiable as to the date the previous editor checked it; or perhaps it is simply a better source needed situation. I'd have to know what article or edit you are talking about to be able to tell. N2e (talk) 02:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi N2e. Thank you for your work on November 2024 Amsterdam attacks. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is already another article about this, Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 04:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Man @GrabUp:, I worked really hard to find another article first, before creating that one. I did over a half dozen Wikipedia searches, and nothing came up. So figured I'd just stub out a new article, following normal policy (notability, verifiability, nothing undue or too likely to show a POV, etc.)

Welp, the content will clearly have to be merged. But I think that the title I chose is the far more neutral one. N2e (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I support your title. The article was created just 6 minutes before yours. GrabUp - Talk 04:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Voyager Space Holdings

Hello, N2e. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Voyager Space Holdings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that submission isn't mine. I just created the original redirect for that company back in 2019. Looks like other editors have proposed that article. I looked it over, still needs a lot of work. Made a few suggestions and changed a few things in article prose. N2e (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]