Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Assessment

Article assessment is the process by which weather articles are sorted by quality and importance into the different quality categories and importance categories. This page provides information on the assessment scale as well as the current practice of assessing articles.

Index · Statistics · Log

Weather articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA	4	15	90	75			184
FL	1	4	33	48			86
FM					48		48
A		2	1				3
GA	21	82	450	716	1	1	1,271
B	25	69	157	187	1	12	451
C	32	210	528	868	1	90	1,729
Start	12	141	764	1,792		227	2,936
Stub		13	137	845		145	1,140
List	5	22	117	289	599	439	1,471
Category					2,563		2,563
Disambig					126		126
File					516		516
Portal					613		613
Project					152		152
Redirect		6	54	181	524		765
Template					1,183		1,183
NA					9		9
Other					36		36
Assessed	100	564	2,331	5,001	6,372	914	15,282
Unassessed						5	5
Total	100	564	2,331	5,001	6,372	919	15,287
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 32,334			Ω = 4.19

Instructions

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Weather}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Weather articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Weather articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Weather articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Weather articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Weather articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Weather articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Weather articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Weather articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Weather articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Weather articles)		Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Weather articles)		Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Weather articles)		Draft
FM (for featured media only; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Weather articles)		FM
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Weather articles)		File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Weather articles)		Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Weather articles)		Project
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Weather articles)		Redirect
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Weather articles)		Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Weather articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Weather articles)		???

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

These criteria apply to general-content articles. Weather articles have additional criteria/guidelines about what sorts of content and formatting should be provided for an article of each class; see the talk page for discussion of these.

Each weather article has its assessment included inside the {{WikiProject Weather}} template, such as {{WikiProject Weather|class=B}}. This provides automatic categorization within Category:Weather articles by quality. Note that the class parameter is case-specific; see the template's documentation for more information.

B-Class criteria

In addition to the above, B-Class articles for the WikiProject should meet the following six criteria:

B

The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The use of either <ref> tags or citation templates such as {{cite web}} is not required. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "brilliant". The Manual of Style need not be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.

Importance assessments

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Weather}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Weather|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Weather articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Weather articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Weather articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Weather articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Weather articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Weather articles)		???

Importance scale

WikiProject article importance scheme

Importance	Criteria	Example
Top	Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field.	Kindergarten
High	Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.	Factory Acts
Mid	Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.	0.999...
Low	Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.	G cell

Assessment log

November 21, 2024

Renamed

• Hurricane Paul (1982) renamed to Hurricane Paul.
• List of storms named Paul renamed to Hurricane Paul (disambiguation).

Reassessed

• 2022 Andover tornado (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• 2022–2023 Saudi Arabia floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Afghanistan floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Akosombo dam spillage flood (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Arizona wildfires (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Canadian drought (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Caribbean heat wave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 European heatwaves (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Nova Scotia floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Nyingchi avalanche (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Pacific Northwest floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Samoa floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 South America heat wave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 South Asian floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023–24 Asian winter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024–25 North American winter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Carl-Gustaf Rossby Research Medal (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Typhoon Mindulle (2016) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 1991 Andover tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:2019 Dayton tornado (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Hurricane Paul (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
• Hurricane Paul (disambiguation) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• June 2022 Chicago supercell (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Northeast Pacific bomb cyclone (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• November 2024 Northeast Pacific bomb cyclone (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Warn-on-Forecast (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)

November 20, 2024

Renamed

• Canwarn renamed to CANWARN.

Reassessed

• 2006 Colorado Holiday Blizzards (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Surface layer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tornadoes of 2011 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2013 Wayne tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2022 Andover tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Andover tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Disambig-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• CANWARN (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• 2023 Idaho wildfires (talk) removed.

November 19, 2024

Renamed

• Hurricanes in Costa Rica renamed to List of Costa Rica hurricanes.
• Hurricanes in Honduras renamed to List of Honduras hurricanes.
• Hurricanes in Nicaragua renamed to List of Nicaragua hurricanes.

Reassessed

• 2024 Spanish floods (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
• Atsumu Ohmura (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Hurricane Helene (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Temperate climate (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tropical Storm Pilar (2023) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• List of Costa Rica hurricanes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• List of Honduras hurricanes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• List of Nicaragua hurricanes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• File:Tropical Storm Sara AccuWeather Forecast.webp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• WUHU (software) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

November 18, 2024

Reassessed

• 1887 Halloween tropical storm (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Hurricane Elida (2002) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Hurricane Rafael (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Temperate climate (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• Tropical Storm Kaemi (2000) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

November 17, 2024

Renamed

• Hurricane Rafael (2024) renamed to Hurricane Rafael.

Reassessed

• List of the wettest tropical cyclones by country (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Typhoon Man-yi (2024) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Hurricane Rafael (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• List of storms named Narsing (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• File:Photograph of the 2010 Fort Leonard Wood tornado.png (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

November 16, 2024

Renamed

• Draft:Tropical Storm Sara renamed to Tropical Storm Sara.
• Tulsa tornadoes of 2017 renamed to 2017 Tulsa tornadoes.
• Draft:Typhoon Man-yi (2024) renamed to Typhoon Man-yi (2024).

Reassessed

• 2007 Greensburg tornado (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Top-Class. (rev · t)
• Typhoon Usagi (2007) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• File:1999 Bridge Creek–Moore tornado aerial of overpass.jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• 2017 Tulsa tornadoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• List of storms named Pepito (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• List of deaths as a result of Cyclone Tracy (talk) removed.

November 15, 2024

Renamed

• List of Storm Prediction Center meso-gamma mesoscale discussions renamed to List of Storm Prediction Center mesoscale discussions on individual tornadoes.
• Draft:Tropical Storm Man-yi (2024) renamed to Draft:Typhoon Man-yi (2024).

Reassessed

• 1984 Southland floods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Tornado outbreak and derecho of April 1–3, 2024 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
• Typhoon Usagi (2007) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• KOMPSAT (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• List of Storm Prediction Center mesoscale discussions on individual tornadoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Tropical Storm Sara (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Typhoon Man-yi (2024) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• File:Photo of the 2022 Andover tornado.png (talk) removed.