User talk:Rasteem
Cage Match
[edit]Cage Match can not be used for anything other than match results. This is listed on the Pro Wrestling project sources page. That is a fact, not a POV push. Using sources outside their reliability scale is against WP:RS. 2001:8003:5130:2601:D17D:27F5:C198:B00A (talk) 00:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
retaliatory?
[edit]Hi, I have noticed you are calling talkpage messages and warnings as retaliatory in spite of the fact that they really are not. This warning by NXcrypto was received before you warned him so it is not retaliatory, in fact it can be construed as the opposite. [1] You also removed a talkpage message by me calling it "retaliatory" about misidentifying an academic from your talkpage. Do note that you can remove any talkpage message or warning but I would like to know what made you think that it was retaliatory, thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- You revert my well explained edits [2], then I reverted your edit with a fully explained edit-summary[3] then gave you an edit warning[4] (At 04:39, 9 November 2024) without replying, you removed the warning notice. [5] Then, in retaliation, you gave me an edit warning (at 08:49 but after NXcrypto). [6] I removed this warning per the obvious retaliatory warning and was given in return for this warning I gave you[7] after your attempt of introducing the origin of any particular state at Political marriages in India. You revert my well described edits I made, describing as "article is only about Political marriages in India; do not introduce origin of any state or kingdom". Later I explained otherwise we have to introduce origin of every state, kingdom or dynasty.
- NXcrypto restored your changes that I reverted, falsely claimed that I conduct an edit war & leave an edit warning on my Talk page[8] at (08:20, 9 November 2024) in return as I gave you an edit warning at (at 04:39, 9 November 2024).[9] ®asteem Talk 10:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well your warning was frivolous because that was not "unconstructive" change in anyway. [10] This is not a warning, it is a contentious topic alert, read about it at WP:GSCASTE. It is given to any editor editing a certain topic that is placed under sanctions and it does not imply any wrongdoing on your part.
- Also are you really saying that NXcrypto gave you a well intended warning for edit warring (which you were doing instead of following WP:BRD) just because you had issued a warning to me before? That sounds so ridiculous that it doesn't even make any sense. The fact that you're still continuing to call them retaliatory makes it clear that you do not understand what you are doing is wrong. Ratnahastin (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ratnahastin I'm obviously understanding. First of all, I did not conduct any edit warning. The second contentious topic alert was also irrelevant just after the edit warning notice I gave you on your talk page. ®asteem Talk 11:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- You did conduct an edit war, in fact you were edit warring with multiple editors after being warned [11][12], making a total of 3 reverts in less than 24 hours. The alert was not irrelevant, it clearly states that it applies to social groups of south asia, a topic that the article clearly falls under and it is a topic that you are editing right as we speak as well . Ratnahastin (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't in the intention of conducting any edit war even you have used WP:BRD on many pages this is also apply to you when you revert my last edit on Political marriages in India when the cited source mentioned Muzaffar Shah I as Jat you revert my edit. I made this change as I did same for the Mandi State. I think I have explained well. Please also consider not posting Contentious notice again as I'm aware of it and one notice is enough. ®asteem Talk 11:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- You should read WP:BRD carefully, i reverted you because you were edit warring instead of responding to Abhishek 's detailed message on talkpage as is outlined in the policy. I only alerted you once and I cannot do it again per policy so "not posting Contentious notice again" makes no sense. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and I'm aware of BRD but I just said "BRD" also apply when I revert your edit. When you try to 'Overburden' the article of "Political marriages in India" by introducing any state as Rajput state I don't know why your edits of inducing Pulkian dynasty and Kapurthala state originated from Bhatti Rajput.? Was relevant in any actual sense even when related state page Kapurthala has no mention or reliable sources has mentioned state as a Rajput state.? ®asteem Talk 12:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- You should read WP:BRD carefully, i reverted you because you were edit warring instead of responding to Abhishek 's detailed message on talkpage as is outlined in the policy. I only alerted you once and I cannot do it again per policy so "not posting Contentious notice again" makes no sense. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't in the intention of conducting any edit war even you have used WP:BRD on many pages this is also apply to you when you revert my last edit on Political marriages in India when the cited source mentioned Muzaffar Shah I as Jat you revert my edit. I made this change as I did same for the Mandi State. I think I have explained well. Please also consider not posting Contentious notice again as I'm aware of it and one notice is enough. ®asteem Talk 11:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- You did conduct an edit war, in fact you were edit warring with multiple editors after being warned [11][12], making a total of 3 reverts in less than 24 hours. The alert was not irrelevant, it clearly states that it applies to social groups of south asia, a topic that the article clearly falls under and it is a topic that you are editing right as we speak as well . Ratnahastin (talk) 11:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ratnahastin I'm obviously understanding. First of all, I did not conduct any edit warning. The second contentious topic alert was also irrelevant just after the edit warning notice I gave you on your talk page. ®asteem Talk 11:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)