Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement per WP:ECR. Left guide (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High Level of Vandalism 2.49.42.105 (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism 2.49.42.105 (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This topic widely cover the frontline of religious institutes WP:IF and spiritually and usefully pose an verbal important for thousands of daily viewers so its generically an common instance to increase the protection of this sensitive topic at least to extend confirm user right coverage to prevent anonymous intervention from overall contributor's 113.177.117.19 (talk) 20:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. If significant disruption occurs then feel free to re-request protection here. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additionally unsourced or poorly sourced content 2605:59C8:93:E810:D9A3:FA55:1A8:DFAF (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing by new user. JeffSpaceman (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amaury22:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additionally unsourced or poorly sourced 2605:59C8:93:E810:4DCE:7C1D:7D62:1C87 (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 00:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. @EndzoneEnthusiast: There is a lot that is far than ideal here. Edits are being reverted without any explanation. And if there are disruptive edits, then there should be some meaningful user talk page warnings explaining our guidelines and standards, and I don't see any recent warnings. Finally, the recent history is almost entirely bereft of meaningful edit summaries. Please start using edit summaries and leaving warnings when necessary. If the disruption continues in a significant way, we can reconsider page protection at a later time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article keeps getting targeted by IP caste-warriors. Was protected in the past and disruption resumed shortly after its protection expired. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 00:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Unregistered users are wreaking havoc on this page by adding unrelated images, ungrammatical sentences, and edit warring. Generally, all cities have a minimum of pending or semi-protection so the same is required here too. 𝐖𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐟𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫𝟐𝟎𝟒𝟖 00:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 01:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. At least, this needs to be logged as CTOP for post-1992 US politics and permanent ECP. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:54, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Edit war seems to have stopped. Will keep an eye on the article. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:30, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The blocked user Havaa Fitzgerald is back vandalising Template:CNN and Template:CNN personnel. They just keep switching IP, so I'm requesting temporary protection for both. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 01:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both Template:CNN and Template:CNN personnel. Peaceray (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Numerous IP addresses (which probably are all the same person) have maliciously changed the founding year from 1947 to 1964 since October 19, 2024. In addition to the usual warnings in the talk pages of the IPs (some of which have been blocked), the vandalism can easily be recognized by the incoherence of the History section which claims the company was founded in "1964" and then goes on talking about events from the 1950s in the sentences after it. 76.65.74.178 (talk) 01:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 01:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Vandalism immediately after previous semi-expired. seems to have some useful contributions from non autoconfirmed editors Justiyaya 02:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fathoms Below (talk) 03:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Long-term disruption. Anopisthograph (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing and a extremely contentious topic. Multiple sockpuppets have been adding untrue information and violating BLP policy violations for months now. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 08:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Problem editor has been blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Bertrand101 Sock. Gunther :  Talk  09:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:39, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same LTA as before (previous request got voided). Aidan9382 (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protection. Ongoing disruption from various IP editors. A couple of said editors have already been blocked: 2605:A601:A602:E00:415B:D6DE:B0CF:70D9 (talk · contribs) 136.56.188.242 (talk · contribs), so it may be preferable to block the remainder. Barry Wom (talk) 13:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]