Talk:Dangerous Woman (song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dangerous Woman (song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dangerous Woman (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 22, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Ariana Grande High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ariana Grande, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ariana Grande on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ariana GrandeWikipedia:WikiProject Ariana GrandeTemplate:WikiProject Ariana GrandeAriana Grande articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dangerous Woman (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Music Videos

According to Grande, there will be two versions of the musics video, differentiated by the titles of "Visual 1" and "Visual 2". Should we include both versions or treat them as one? I would like to refer to the Sparks (Hilary Duff song) music video for reference. -- User:192.5.215.225 (10:57AM EST 3/31/16) —Preceding undated comment added 14:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The charts peaking positions are not true

Someone fix it please. Thanks. SalemHanna (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are someone. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protracted WP:SYN / ip-hopping edit wars by socks of Smoore95GAGA / highly positive/universal acclaim/acclaim/positive

Summarizing the reviews is synthesis. Are all the reviews everywhere positive? Prove it. How many of the reviews randomly selected to be here are "acclaim" rather than merely "positive" or "neutral"? How did you decide this? Are the sources here representative of all the professional reviewers on the planet?

The sources say what they say. As soon as we decide this review is positive, this other one is a rave and a third one is acclaim, and lump them together, we are combining material from two or more sources to say something none of the sources say directly. This is synthesis. - SummerPhD^v2.0 00:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If material is synthesis and someone removes it as such, restoring it a week later is no better than restoring it immediately. The material is disputed. Per WP:BRD, it is time to discuss it.

If you discuss the material, you might convince others it should stay or you might work together to come up with a workable compromise.

If you do not discuss the material and repeatedly restore it, you are edit warring. The material will be repeatedly removed and you will be blocked from editing.

Take your pick. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SummerPhDv2.0:, you're wasting your time. The IPs that keep adding that SYN include:

166.170.34.148 (talk · contribs)
166.170.33.165 (talk · contribs)
73.81.144.205 (talk · contribs)
87.21.226.108 (talk · contribs)
175.156.224.187 (talk · contribs)
175.156.53.191 (talk · contribs)
87.21.209.34 (talk · contribs)
138.75.179.235 (talk · contribs)
86.110.155.87 (talk · contribs)
104.231.81.183 (talk · contribs)
2604:2000:1303:d4:a09b:229:f710:b2f4 (talk · contribs)
86.110.155.87 (talk · contribs)
...

These all appear to be the IP versions of Smoore95GAGA (talk · contribs) and its now-blocked sock MoonlightMusician (talk · contribs) as evidenced here. I've requested semi-pp. Toddst1 (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And has been done. Thanks @Widr:. Toddst1 (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive material

Two editors are intent on keeping excessive material in this article. This is the latest one. What the singer has to say about the lyrics which are written by someone else is probably real important to the fans, but have very little encyclopedic value, especially given that a. the article is already full of fairly insignificant detail and b. at least the comments on the lyrics are terribly sourced--what is Enstarz.com but a gossip/chat site full of commercialized fan trivia? And that quote on the title change, that's just way too long and needs to be cut if it is to be kept.

In addition, the edit summary by Music01, "Selena Gomez also didn't write Same Old Love, and her explanation wasn't removed just because she didn't write", betrays their inexperience: that another mediocre article (also C-class, and ever more bloated than this one) has something doesn't mean this one should have it. Articles on hit songs seem to be the new area where everything that's more or less verified gets stuck in as if we're Wikia. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pure sale is right

Dangerous woman US pure sale is 890,000 keeps on changing back to 842,000+ for some reason Iamgoffe (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

Resolved

Should the article include as many lyrics as are currently displayed in the "Composition and lyrics" section? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@U990467 and Cartoon network freak: Pinging the two Good article review participants, just in case. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: Fixed the whole section now. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dangerous Woman (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]