User talk:MrOllie

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

AN

Someone started a thread about you at WP:AN and did not notify you. I figured I'd give you a heads up since they didn't. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson Solid List

If you have any objections to my edit to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Johnson_solids#External_links then can you please put them in the talk page under the section I created? I don't think there needs to be a consensus for such a small edit so if you have a problem with the edit please address it directly. Also the way you have left the page has no external link to any visualisations which is decidedly worse than where it was before you or I edited it. HappyWrap (talk) 1:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

You've tried to add that link and been reverted several times. You absolutely need there to be a consensus for that or any other disputed edit, no matter how small. If there is no consensus for any particular link, then there shouldn't be any links on the page. - MrOllie (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting a sockpuppet and harasser

Hi,Sir A sockpuppet is constantly putting unsourced content on the wikipage Uddhav Thackeray,After removing his unsourced edits,he is harassing me on my talk page. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.228.176.138 )

Regards Io5678 (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try WP:ANI. MrOllie (talk) 21:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please,can you try on my behalf Io5678 (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. MrOllie (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying,please guide me.

Thanks for the response Io5678 (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The instructions at WP:ANI are pretty clear. After notifying the other editor by putting "{{subst:ANI-notice}} ~~~~" on their talk page, you can just repost your account of the problem at WP:ANI, and administrators will take it from there. _signed,Willondon (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcehut

Hi MrOllie, I noticed you removed an already discussed item in the talk section I added called sourcehut. Apologies, I was not aware that it is needed an independent page to be in those tables. Technically, it has more features than many others, as shown in the tables, while others like Phabricator has already ceased its activities.AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a catalog or a link directory, we're not attempting to list every possible service, only the ones which have demonstrated notability in the form of a standalone article. You could proceed by writing a standalone article, if the available sources meet the requirements of WP:N.

Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a catalog, we write about and list things of historical importance, even if they are not currently active. We still have an article on Isaac Newton even though he hasn't written any new scientific papers for while. MrOllie (talk) 17:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have commented about this in 3 separate places, I will not respond here any more. MrOllie (talk) 17:48, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Except to note for the future that you altered the above comment after I'd already responded to it. MrOllie (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing it while you wrote me, so I did not read your message before my edit. Apologies. It was too long, and too tecnhical. AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I am not yet an expert. You wrote me in my page so I replied you there, but you did not replied me, and other editors request to write in their pages, so I wrote here. Obviously I commented in talk section of the page we are talking about, as it is a logical place to contact with other editors about it. As I was not the only one considering that the table might not be complete. AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information. I have to note that there are tons of tables where entries doesn't have an specific wikipedia page, and others where the entry is pointing to a wrong page of wikipedia. AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]