User talk:Filmssssssssssss

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Click here to leave me a note or start a topic

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to the surfside building collapse article

One thing - be careful of over linking. We only want the first time something is mentioned to be a wikilink. Secretlondon (talk) 19:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Intforce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, National Museum of China, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. intforce (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You need to preview your edits. You couldn't have even looked at National World War I Museum either before or after you wrecked it, and you did other malformed edits here and here. Slow down. — Smuckola (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hanzi in lead sentence

Thanks for your attention to the Qing emperors, but MOS:CHINESE#Introductory sentences says the Hanzi should be "either in the first sentence or in an info box." There is an info box on these pages, so no need for Hanzi in the lead sentence. Cheers in any case! ch (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disappearance of Anthonette Cayedito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

School shooting

I didn't revert you the second time, but I can't say I disagree with it--there was no closing punctuation, I think there was a line break in it, and there was something wrong with the reference or the reference name. This is obviously a high-visibility article, so please be careful, and check preview, before you post an edit. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:FIES

Hello. I notice that you don't provide edit summaries to your edits. It's very helpful and useful to other editors if you do so, and WP:FIES explains why this is so. Please review that guideline. I invite you to consider adding edit summaries to your edits, which will also have the benefit of reducing the number of reversions to your edits, as other editors will be able to read and understand your edit rationales. Thanks. Moncrief (talk) 23:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gae

Ndjdx 82.131.31.189 (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HRM Andrew Thomas Ackerman of Windsor.

Can we just st discuss this man. 24.89.118.190 (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image changes

Hi, please don't replace infobox portraits with older photos for no reason. Also, please use edit summaries when editing. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

seconded. --Erp (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to 2022 Bronx Apartment Fire

Hello,

I reverted your edit for clarity and to remove jargon on the article. If you wish, feel free to edit the page again to indicate that it was a high-rise fire, as that would be the more appropriate terminology. Dreameditsbrooklyn (talk) 22:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Palace of Westminster does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Paris1127 (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss: Hello, I asked you back in December 2021 to please use edit summaries. You have continued to make countless contributions without an edit summary. Would you mind please, please, giving a brief explanation of your edits? It really isn't that difficult. Thank you. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images properly

Please learn more about adding images and making edits. I've improved two of your edits now:

At Copts, I added a "thumb" parameter to the "File" link, and changed the caption from "Coptic_diaspora_map" to "Coptic diaspora",[1] to improve your edit there.
Similarly,[2] at Australians, with your edit there.
You can see the difference between them, if you view Copts before and after, and Australians before and after

When you make an edit, you can use the "Show preview" function to see how your changes are going to look on the page. I don't normally deal with images in articles, so if you plan to do more of that, it would be more efficient overall if you checked your changes, and picked up some ideas on how to make sure the improvements are the best they can be. _signed,Willondon (talk) 23:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xie of Xia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Ross (acoustician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Submariner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm CactiStaccingCrane. I noticed that you recently removed content from SpaceX without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —Svārtava (t/u) • 03:58, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning users

Hey, I've noticed you reverting some vandalism. One minor thing -- when you are warning users, instead of {{uw-vandalism1}}, you should subst the template, ie. {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. There are tools that can semi-automate this process like Twinkle. Good job otherwise :) >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle

Hi - I noticed what you were doing at Kentucky there - thank you for that. Just a tip - you might want to consider installing WP:Twinkle. It looks like you went to some considerable effort to remove all that nonsense; amongst other useful stuff, Tinkle would have allowed you to remove it all with a single mouse click. It's not a separate application or anything - it just adds a few buttons to the screen when you're reading/editing through your regular browser. Cheers Girth Summit _(blether) 17:19, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signature in talk pages

Hello, good job with fighting vandalism. I noticed that you are not using a linked signature on your comments after the templates. To do it properly you can use the signature and timestamp button on the menu or you can add this code: --~~~~

Regards, --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Thanks for your RC patrolling work. Just wanted to give you a heads up that this probably wasn't a good use of standard rollback. The IP editor removed text that was partially unsourced and partially incomprehensible, with an accurate edit summary. This was a content dispute, not vandalism, so standard rollback with no edit summary wasn't the right tool. agtx 13:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the article

Cho has left the USSS.2401:7400:4007:5104:B589:DA2D:1773:24A7 (talk) 14:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're the wrong person https://dealbreaker.com/2021/12/citadel-hires-secret-service-agen please apologise. 2401:7400:4007:5104:B589:DA2D:1773:24A7 (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

Thanks for your concern, but my edits aren't vandalism. High school pages are full of "notable alumni" that are really non-notable, unsourced additions. I am merely removing those. There are a lot so I understand why it looks like section blanking. It isn't. 76.94.59.40 (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rollbacks on Tarski's axiomatization of the reals

Hello, I have no idea why my edits on Tarski's axiomatization of the reals are constantly being rolled back by you. The proof in the section Tarski's axiomatization of the reals#How these axioms imply a field before my edits claims that Tarski's axioms imply that "the real numbers are also Dedekind-complete, divisible, and Archimedean, but Tarski's original source never proved that the axioms form a total order, let alone a divisible group and Archimedean group. As a result, the proof needs to be elaborated to show that the real numbers are a divisible group and Archimedean group from Tarski's axioms, which is what I have done in my edits. As a result, I am going to revert the edits back to the state it was before the rollback. Thanks. 96.63.208.31 (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hello! Thanks for the feedback. As I am editing through a mobile phone, I am struggling to punctuate and construte my sentence in a formal tone. I hope you I have a great day ahead! Useaho (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

Please review the paragraph that I removed from the Catherine Tramell page. It is poorly written, barely coherent nonsense and has no place on Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.11.73.170 (talk) 18:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concerns, but cannot just blank pages without approval -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please help, trolls are attacking the Catherine Tramell article

You helped yesterday but they are back.

Please, help, there's a vandalic user that during more than a year has tried to delete it. Please, help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.202.17.248 (talk) 17:44, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you frequently revert things that are NOT vandalism

guessing you use tools to help you. They need some tweaks... 65.127.183.235 (talk) 16:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your edits, because I saw that you had added

"pf its airing" Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blondie radio series

Please look at edits carefully before reverting. Sometimes removing a large amount of text is valid. 128.151.71.7 (talk) 13:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

got it, -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts in counter-vandalism... Keep it going! Volten001 ^☎ 13:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who's the vandal?

I used imperial measurements on a page relevant to the US of A.

You've got a problem, not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.183.10.84 (talk) 16:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why the revert?

At the page Ozyorsk, Chelyabinsk Oblast, you reverted an edit I made. Why has my edit been reverted? 83.87.200.140 (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I see that you have reverted your revert 83.87.200.140 (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN page reverts

Just in case you are not monitoring my talk page, I will repost the same content here for your consideration:

== Reverts ==

Hi,

I understand your concerns, but next time cite sources before removing large amounts of content 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to "cite sources" in such an instance, though to help out trigger-happy reverters on vandalism patrol such as yourself User 2601:196:180:8d80:1d68:17d0:e86b:f982 linked the appropriate section of the Wikipedia Manual of Style for you to reference - and you still blindly reverted their edit. As well as the previous dozen, all of which had appropriate edit summaries (clearly indicating the work was methodical and constructive, and defintely NOT vandalism), in one mass revert. You may blank my warning on your talk page, but any repeat actions such as these indeed will be escalated to administrative review, as vandalism patrol is not a blank ticket to abuse your editing privileges at others' expense. 2601:196:180:8D80:11A3:8F01:3CB:69E5 (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not abusing my editing privileges 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By definition you are, mass reverting obviously constructive article edits (complete with edit summaries) under guise of vandalism patrol, and further impugning the edits as activity that belonged in the editor's sandbox. Then repeat reverting. And blanking your talk page to cover your trail. None of this is constructive. Try becoming familiar with WP:MOS and taking the time to familiarize yourself with edits before you revert them.2601:196:180:8D80:11A3:8F01:3CB:69E5 (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Small trout

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Never_Fear&diff=next&oldid=1138237850 Bar Harel (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work though ❤️ Bar Harel (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the Bridges

I have no source, no citation. But I think that everyone having heard of the Bridge of Sighs would understand the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.166.148.86 (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV reports

Hello @Filmssssssssssss. I am @Archer1234. I observed your recent reports at WP:AIV and noticed a couple of things that you should be aware of. First, every new report should go at the bottom. You have been adding them to the top of the section (just underneath the comment that reads List begins BELOW this line). Second, each report should include an asterisk * at the beginning as the pages lists all reports as a bulleted list. As a consequence of the way you have been doing it, when the bot detects that the account/IP you are reporting has been blocked it removes it, but it also removes all of the items below it as it thinks they are comments of your report. So, I'd appreciate it if you could adjust how you add future reports. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:36, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a regular admin at AIV, I don't care what order the reports are in because they shouldn't be there for very long. The asterisk is helpful though, so we don't confuse the bots! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Filmssssssssssss. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding kurulus-osman Malhun Hatun

kindly allow me to put correct information about malhun hatun. some users are unnecessarily reverting my edits. she is the main character. and I have edit all information series accordingly. you can check. help me please 103.131.214.255 (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 103.131.214.255,

Are you properly citing sources? That could be the problem 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doofus—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit by Crystallizedcarbon has been reverted by an admin - Filmssssssssssss

About your WP:AIV reports

Hello! Hope you are having a good day. I wanted to bring attention to your reports, specifically, you can see all the ones in this revision: [3]. For a specific edit, see [4]. Your reports are malformed. You are doing part of it correctly, but the ending curly braces need to be on the same line, otherwise the bot gets confused and doesn't delete the reports correctly.

On one line, we have *{{IP Vandal template part, and on the second line we have the }} for the end of the template. These need to be moved up so the correct report is *{{IPvandal template/Vandal template}} <reason here>. Also, just a reminder, to report IPs you would use the IPVandal template, and for regular users, you would use the Vandal template. I just wanted to give you a heads up, and in the future, it would probably be best if you used Twinkle or a different antivandalism tool to make the reports, so we don't have this issue again. Thanks for your time, and have a good day! Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of cheese

Why did you reinstate the vandalism to to this article? Bibliosporias (talk) 09:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, mistake made 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will try to be more careful when reverting next time 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello mr. Filmsssssssss, This is regarding the page you edited on Wikipedia = Mumtaz Kazi

Please “hyperlink” the page SUREKHA YADAV inside the page of Mumtaz Kazi so that you will get all the proofs necessary to highlight the wrong Fact that Mumtaz Kazi is NOT first, but she is second in every category. First is Surekha Yadav in each and every type of sub-category of Indian Trains. Please make these correct and legal corrections as Surekha Yadav is far more senior than Mumtaz Kazi and we need to respect the FACTS !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.75.189 (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your 's' key needs fixing. Deal with that before preaching your message of anti-vandalissssm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.213.146.202 (talk) 16:52, 15 March 2023 (UTC) User blocked by admin - 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hi, there's no need to give all four warnings like a bot. For obvious bad faith (ie not just someone seeing if they really can edit) or repeated vandalism, you can start at level 2 or 3 or even 4im. I'll block if they've had enough of a hint that what they're doing is disruptive, so if they ignore a level 3 (for example) feel free to report them to AIV. But please not both. If you decide to give them another warning, don't report them to AIV unless they vandalise after that one, and if you decide to go straight to AIV, just skip the final warning. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

got it, thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gold parting

Hi, i saw that you reverted my edit without explaining why. Could you give me a hint what was wrong with the addition? I am sure you did not think the paragraph was perfect before... 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your concerns. please refer to WP:GF good faith editing, some edits may not be vandalism, however they might not be necessary, if you have enay questions, please contact me on this talkpage- Best, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you do not see a contradiction in the sentence "X removes A and B from C, but B cannot be removed."?? 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will revert the edit, and restore your edit 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 :) 2001:9E8:85:6D00:0:0:0:486 (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Filmssssssssssss. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep reverting a legitimate edit

I have repeatedly attempted to make the comments regarding the dating of Isa more netural POV. There is no decisive evidence for a date in the Babylonian exile. While some scholars refer to those chapters as "deutro-Isaiah" other, very reputable scholars, do not. While SOME scholars believe in a late date, other, very reputable scholars disagree. So stating that it IS dated from the Babylonian exile is not accurate, but rather that, in the view of some scholars, it dates from that time period. 173.71.213.235 (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User has been blocked for edit warring 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland

Greenland no longer uses dst and its only the thule air base and ittoqqortoormiit that uses dst 174.94.97.125 (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reaching out. I saw that you had inserted the edit directly into the page, disrupting the structure of the article. If you go back to your version of the edit, you will see that the first thing readers will see is a random sentence in full uppercase inserted directly into the article with no context. If you must, please post this in the talk page for the site.

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan White

Hi, you removed content from Nathan White's wiki page. The content on the coaching was 100% accurate and truthful. The send paragraph waa also accurate, he has no background or education in the field. I do apologize, the second paragraph was sarcastic, in many respects, but I'm uncertain of your role: were you notified by Nathan white? How did, or why did you modify a wiki page without verifying content truthfulness? What is your role with Wikipedia, if any? If you could respond, I'd appreciate it. I do not believe, and I think the public perception is simply that Wikipedia is NOT meant to be a biased self promotion. Period. That is exactly what Mr White's page is, self built, self directed, self promotion. He should stick to his blog or use social eduard, not inhabit Wikipedia. Please advise, if you could. Respect,

Hi, Please see/refer to WP:NPOV. The edit you made seems to violate this policy. Also (This goes with all Wikipedia talkpages), leave your message at the bottom of the page. In this case, I have added a very large "Click here to leave me a note or start a topic". Please keep this in mind when editing other users' talkpages-𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. I reviewed. Would it be better if one was to get confirmation or provide documentation to you, that illustrates the facts detailed? Ie. An email from the district detailing the abuse and specifics of the firing? That sort of thing.

Thank you for the clarification. If you could detail how one can update on this subject, it would be appreciated- as example of what one would seek: can one note under an "education" headline, often found on wiki pages, that no journalism degree was obtained? Or is this- and the link was appreciated and helpful, thank you - only driven by what's in media? I ask because some of what this person has posted is really only known to him and not necessarily anyone else, nor published on web or media: these alleged small regional awards, the alleged volunteer posts, the alleged obscure elected positions...things of that nature are not necessarily tracked or accountable back to a media story. Can one remove those or report them to be removed? 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, again...its appreciated, this info you've provided. May I ask: how can anything this Nathan white be confirmed? There are no citations, no evidence of his claimed or alleged accomplishments. Nothing, at all. I'm not trying to be smart, but a person could just come into here and fabricate a life or career. How is Nathan White's alleged career or listing of alleged accomplishments, verifiable or confirmed? 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you are not trying to be malicious. You need to cite the information and place the citation on the article. As you may know, this is important not only within Wikipedia but in most (if not all) of academia. Please refer to WP:CS for a guide to citing on the site.

A rule of thumb is that if it is not cited anywhere, then you shouldn't put it in the article.

𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very much. For your understanding, patience and taking time to explain. Much appreciated and best wishes. Great work/job, btw. You do important work, with little thanks or fanfare. Without you, it's the "wild west" out there, and the policing and editing is very necessary and appreciated! 159.2.160.132 (talk) 22:58, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, if you have any questions about the site, please feel free to reach out to me or my colleagues (Admins, etc) on Wikipedia. Again, I'm glad you are here to contribute, unlike a lot of other IP's I've encountered here 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cottonwood Canyon (Kane County, Utah), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kane County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ragtime

I did put a reason in my edits. I removed two paragraphs that were redundant, added a source to a claim, and cleaned up the article. 2600:1700:604:CC00:B1C5:3B21:A70A:75E8 (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've reviewed your edit and decided to reinstate it at the discretion of other editors

𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your regular work on anti-vandalism as seen at WP:AIV. Thank you and keep up the good work. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh look, yet another barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work RC patrolling and catching/reporting vandals so they don't disrupt Wikipedia.

-- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the second barnstar today! Thanks very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Either ways, great work catching that vandal in The David Pakman Show today. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 02:53, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My recent contributions to wikipedia

I understand that it wasn’t the perfect edit as I am quite new new Wikipedia but I personally think that the letter from William De la pole, Duke of Suffolk to his son before his died is important and should be on his Wikipedia page. If you could tell me what I can do to make it a good contribution.

82.42.163.170 (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've reviewed your edit and deemed it to be appropriate. I've reinstated it at the discretion of other editors

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:2A01:5EC0:7803:7D29:6E68:C10A:A16F:2DB2

Hello, just a note that editors (both registered and IPs) can generally remove warnings and other information on their own talk page. See WP:BLANKING for more information. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah) (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The image doesn't really show the Canyon at all. Just the Wasatch Mountains.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Filmssssssssssss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Im new to wikipedia

I have 2 questions; i accidntally found your account while surfing on recent changes, how do i change references on pages when the format is just something like [References something] Second question how do i change my username Okascfklk (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okascfklk (talk) 21:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Okascfklk[reply]

Hi Okascfklk, Thank you for reaching out

1, what do you mean by "References"? Do you mean you need help citing sources?

2, Usernames can be changed only by global renamers; requests should be made at Wikipedia:Changing username. User accounts with few or no edits might not be renamed, as it is quicker and easier to simply create a new account.

3, Please proofread your entries on Wikipedia talkpages, even if it means making multiple edits. Others may by a little bit more nitpicky than me when it comes to adding proofread/spellchecked entries.

Hope this helps, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Yes when im editing source i cant change it because the references section is not fully written down so i cant change anything, i am also quite nitpicky

2. Ill change it when i have a reasonable amount of edits

3. Yes Okascfklk (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I see an example of what you are describing? This would be much better for me to see an example so that I can better help you 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add the references of Bernardo del Carpio as an estimate of leading the Basque army in the Battle of Roncevaux Pass, tried to add a reference but idk how to add it

I described it in my edit summary but i doubt anyone can see it

For reference, i edited it with source code. Just easier for me Okascfklk (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add "<ref>" before the citation, as well as the same thing after the citation but with "/" before "<ref" after the end of the citation 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. And how can i translate pages? Okascfklk (talk) 21:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use Google Translate or some other software, but do not add non- English information to pages other than citations. Also regarding citations, use Easybib or another free citation generator to guide you through this process 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Okascfklk (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV again

Hi, please don't report vandals to AIV until they've vandalised after an appropriate warning. There is no point leaving a warning then reporting them to AIV before they've edited again. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I noticed that you were patrolling recent changes at the same time as me, and I wanted to thank you for helping to deal with all of those vandals :) Cheers! Fake scientist 8000 19:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to 2023 Sudan clashes: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 00:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for this 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Finney Article

I noticed on my WatchList that you recently reverted vandalism to the Joan Finney article by User talk:2604:CA00:1C8:99B3:0:0:662:1A25, and I was wondering if you were recommending any further action should be taken to either block this user or semi-protect the article because other recent acts of vandalism to the Joan Finney article by that user have also been reverted. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. TommyBoy (talk) 00:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye out for any unconstructive edits this IP performs until May. If he does not make unconstructive edits until May, the April edits will become stale, and we will have to wait for another 4 reverted edits in order to qualify for a block 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up with me. The other user who recently reverted edits by User talk:2604:CA00:1C8:99B3:0:0:662:1A25 to the Joan Finney article also recommended against blocking the user or semi-protecting the article, but I will keep an eye on the article on my WatchList.--TommyBoy (talk) 02:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My recent ban

Might have been a bit harsh, don't you think? 157.231.120.86 (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our block on your IP was justified. You vandalize, we block. Vandalize again, and we will block you for longer. We have already done this 3 times on your IP. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Onanist 157.231.120.86 (talk) 14:46, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Loona

Please do not accept any changes in the members status per consensus on the talk archive Talk:Loona/Archive 1#"Former members". Lightoil (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Filmssssssssssss you say you are on vacation yet you continue to edit. Can you please respond? Lightoil (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I will remove that template, forgot to do so 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Hi, this was a perfectly legit edit you reverted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Solar_deity&oldid=1152056987

I removed a bunch of stuff that is unrelated to the article and is already discussed on the Christmas page (which is linked to). The relevant part, the specific theory that relates to Sol Invictus, was left intact. The Zodiac section has been marked for years as unreliably sourced and looks like original research, so I removed that too. Rather than revert the whole edit, please edit back in the specific information you think is missing from the edit. Reverting the edit did not leave the article in a better state. 76.135.106.145 (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve reinstated your edit at the discretion of other editors 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About the meritocracy removal

I'm sorry I don't quite know how wikipedia edit work i didn't know we needed to justify it, but basically it mentioned Mill, a 19th century philosopher in the 17th century tab so i figured i'd just put the content in the right time tab ? If that makes sense ! 91.180.120.64 (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your edit, and I appreciate your efforts. Next time, please use the edit summary next time so it does not get confused for bad faith edits

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your hard anti-vandalism work. Your username shows up every minute on my watchlist at AIV! Tails Wx 18:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why I got banned

I don't understand, plain and simple. 157.231.120.86 (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at your edits, “Brian ‘’’Pancake’’’ Wells” is one example.

We blocked you for disruptive editing. Please read my philosophy on my userpage, as well as WP:DE 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:39, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referencing the actual site which makes announcements for these moons:

https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K23/K23J48.html is the latest announcement, and as I was typing this, we got another one. 108.160.120.19 (talk) 03:10, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your citing, but we don't need edit summaries containing personal statements, such as "I'm very tired and I need a nap". Please keep all edit summaries orderly and professional

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I quite literally spent hours in front of a screen just refreshing and editing. (And I'm just human as well - I spent most of yesterday evening just editing and citing. I was expecting to do more of it today but I'm actually exhausted and I really do need some kind of nap.) 108.160.120.19 (talk) 03:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're doing great lately! Reverting vandalism faster than I can find them. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thanks for good work, keep it up! DreamRimmer (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your work :) -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 18:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:39, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Ferry

Hi im not sure why my edit about the link between bryan and benjamin ferry was pulled! Somd peopld mighg bf interested to know he is related to an interesting architect! 2A00:23C5:E930:1801:19E1:107E:9E0D:7131 (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to source this information from a reputable source or scholarly article, not something you personally know. Also, consider spellchecking your messages before posting 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Kerr

sorry to see that you erased my addition as propable "vandalism". In fact, Alfred Kerr must have been quite unique in his time: witty, sarcastic, sharp (as a knife? *lol*) and some kind of "arbiter elegantium". But alas, quotable sources from pre-war Germany are scarce. I do remember that some renowned historian made that claim about him, in a book about Hitler from the Fifties, that my father owned ... Can you try and set up an "Wikipedia Research" on such a topic ? kind regards L.H. 46.114.223.56 (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you are talking about. I checked your log and the only thing you have in it is your edit to my talkpage 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 12:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I simply don't get it. It says (on the "Judith Kerr" page),that you reverted one edit (mine). I think at 19:03.. . ? / or so it seems to me... and of course I didn't check what kind of number was indicated, as I simply wouldn't have time to log in / sign on or whatever ;-) 46.114.220.176 (talk) 14:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. Please try not to use multiple accounts when editing, This way, you can avoid being mistaken for Sockpuppetry.

2. You added information that seems correct, but is unsourced. You need to cite your information you found.

(A rule not just specific to Wikipedia) 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. right you are, but- as I mentioned, alas : I'm not the scholar needed to fulfil this task. Perhaps Wikipedia does not only need permanent cleaning and editing, but also some subroutine that helps to connect "unsourced" additions to the sources of enlightenment (or keepers of the books, savants who are ... exactly what ? .. not just a being like Terry Pratchett's discworld's orang utang - librarian ? ) ... I mean , before an addition is formally accepted to a page ?

just a random thought... 46.114.220.176 (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Put it in the page talkpage. Then we will decide on it 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your anti vandal work I see you have been doing on many articles User101FrOas (talk) 20:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I think that you may need to delete the funny vandalism list on your userpage per WP:DENY - IMO, I wouldn't want to give the vandals a "hall of fame". -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 00:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do that now 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Have I given you one already? Eh, whatever. Also, just noticed you and I are about neck and neck in terms of edits ;) Keep up the good work! 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I really appreciate your efforts fighting vandalism. It’s always great to see a productive IP 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Witch hunt (disambiguation)

I would be grateful if you could explain your revert at the article Talk page, as your edit summary was somewhat obscure. Many thanks. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 205.239.40.03,

Thank you for reaching out.

When editing, please keep descriptions brief and short, especially on disambiguation pages.

Thanks, 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Even if the definition is essentially wrong? I think your explanation might be more useful at the article Talk page, not here. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Post your discussions at the article talkpage 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted my rationale. A "discussion" generally includes more than a single contributor. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody will respond eventually 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, perhaps somebody who made the reverts. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

يا غبي لماذا تزيل

والدتك عاهرة وسوف أراها الليلة وسوف تشاهدها 37.252.89.246 (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your hateful message has been noted, will report to AIV 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

internet censorship map removal

There's no need for passive agressive messages implying that I wouldn't consiously make such a change. There was no mistake on my part. The map is misleading, I removed it, you didn't approve of my change, so you reverted it. Just look at wikipedia's own article on internet censorship at usa and ask yourself whether usa has the proper color in the map. 91.138.173.212 (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will revert my edit and restore your edit, apologies on my behalf 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

|}

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Study invitation for anti-vandalism patroller

Hi @Filmssssssssssss, thanks for reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for anti-vandalism patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandalism tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 02:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol needs your help!

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devils Garden (Arches National Park), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Arch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Great work. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arches National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Angel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit on Godzilla minus one page.

Hello, I recently put an edit on the Godzilla Minus one page and I believe you reverted it. I can understand if it was in the wrong place or not supposed to be in the section, but it is something I feel should be on the page. Thank you for your time! 24.121.69.2 (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please insert it into it's proper area. If it does not have a proper area, then please discuss it in the page talkpage, and one of us will respond to your inquiry. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you!!! 24.121.69.2 (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Please do not make edits such as "There are many other people such as Donald trump and queens Elizabeth who Fortnite’s danced there way to the top of the cities and demolished iron man". it is disruptive, and questions any future edits that you make, even if they are legitimate. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. That wasn’t the best Idea in the world. That was also when I did not no much about Wikipedia editing so I thought it would be harder to edit a page. Anyway thank you again for your time and may you have a good day! 24.121.69.2 (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising Wikipedia

Yeah 81.109.119.32 (talk) 07:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How am I vandalizing? You are the one who has been vandalizing in the past 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 12:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Filmssssssssssss!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 10:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to blocked users' Talk page

Why are you removing warnings from users who have been blocked calling it "cleanup"? You shouldn't be removing anything from any user Talk pages, but these removals make no sense.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry about that 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will stop doing that 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:49, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Filmssssssssssss. Thank you for your work on Pine Tree Arch. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

I'm thrilled to share the exciting news that your article has met all of Wikipedia's guidelines! After a careful review, I'm happy to say that it's good to go. Great job! Wishing you and your family an absolutely fantastic day ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ranges and warnings

Re this edit of yours at AIV: At the moment, there is no way to warn an entire range. And warning one page (especially in an IPv6 range like this where all the IPs may be dynamically assigned to the same user) is no guarantee that the user in question will ever see it.

So I will be blocking them despite the absence of a warning. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feeding disruption instructions

Ouch. Regarding this edit [5], I was about to reply, pointing to Wikipedia:Articles. This editor seems intent on disruption, so I didn't want to make it too easy to waste everone's time by abusing the mechanisms of Wikipedia with useless attempts at further disruption. I think the job is done. They'll be blocked for sure without any further engagement. Best not to give them names, when they're destined for the abattoir. My two cents. _signed,Willondon (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse host - belated welcome

Dear Filmssssssssssss,

Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

Useful scripts you can install to make responding easier,
templates to use and, of course:
the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

My apologies for the extremely belated welcome. Although you've not yet contributed to the Teahouse, I do hope you feel confident to do so in the near future.

Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Rowsome

Any reason for unexplained and inexplicable reverts of sourced edits? 65.88.88.54 (talk) 19:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I reverted my edit and restored yours, my apologies 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upon review, you did. My apologies. I went back and did it over without noticing. Yours, 65.88.88.54 (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah)

Hello, Filmssssssssssss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RfPP

Hey, apologies for any inconvenience caused by my edits - mobile editing is a lot more difficult than it should be sometimes. I've refiled the request to protect Jodi Rell at RfPP. — ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 19:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for reaching out! 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Linnell - Health & Personal

I note that you have removed additional information that I have inserted today (12th September 2023) about myself. They refer to two health issues that have affected me in recent months, and two additional items about my personal life. I would like to know why you have seen fit to remove them? 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:78B6:5291:A221:936E (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

We don't know this is you, as this is the internet (Anybody could pose as this person). Could you please provide a reliable source for this information?

Thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise me how to do this. I am providing information about myself from my own lived experience. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:78B6:5291:A221:936E (talk) 21:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot do this. All information on Wikipedia has to come from a reliable source (A website (not a blog), a book, a scholarly article, etc) Please see WP:SOURCE for more information regarding sources 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With respect - and I have no idea who you are - there can be no more “reliable source” about me than me. I have been interviewed about my prostate cancer diagnosis by one of the radio stations I used to work for (BBC CWR), so if that is not further proof I don’t know what is. I have thought very hard about revealing my health issues in this way, so I am disgusted that you should see fit to remove it - whoever you are. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:8C51:A95:9D0C:829E (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your frustrations, but we don't know who you are. Anybody could pose as anyone on the internet.

Also, please refrain from using multiple IP's in discussions like this. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I really don’t know who you would expect to have written a book, a blog or provided any other information about my personal health consultations and diagnosis other than me. The NHS would not provide that because a patient confidentiality. And I don’t understand the issue of using “multiple IP’s”. I am sorry if my ignorance of such things is causing a problem, but I am not consciously using any information that I shouldn’t be. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:8C51:A95:9D0C:829E (talk) 21:24, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it should have read “because of patient confidentiality”. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:8C51:A95:9D0C:829E (talk) 21:25, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please put your discussion regarding your information in the page talkpage, so it can be discussed among other editors. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have only just read this, received whilst writing my previous reply about going to bed. That I am going to do, so maybe progress tomorrow. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:8C51:A95:9D0C:829E (talk) 21:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am guessing you are in America and therefore a number of hours, depending on your location, behind us in the UK, where it is now 22.37. I am going to bed, extremely disappointed at your actions. If communicating by email is more convenient, I would be happy to exchange addresses and continue this sometime tomorrow. Thank you, at least, for replying to me even though I am at a loss to know how to have my additions included to a page detailing my own life. For now, good night. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:8C51:A95:9D0C:829E (talk) 21:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing our messages from last night, I remain concerned that the texts I posted about myself - specifically about my health issues and personal life - were deleted. I would like them reinstated. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:D872:46AD:1461:F04A (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will reinstate them, ok? 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That’s much appreciated. 2A00:23C8:184:CD01:D872:46AD:1461:F04A (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Filmssssssssssss. Thank you for your work on Skyline Arch. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Faster than the speed of light. Knitsey (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIV. Again.

Hi. We've had this conversation before. Please stop the premature reports or I'll partially block you from AIV. Two or three silly edits is not enough to establish that an account is NOTHERE or vandalism-only, especially if they haven't been warned. Bear in mind that even in this day and age a lot of people don't realise that their edits go live immediately. Obviously for libel and other serious stuff, you can skip the warnings but for everything else, please follow the instructions in the AIV header. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry for that, will stop doing that now 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KKKK

That webpage needs the sound of Ernie's laughter from Sesame Street.66.26.144.51 (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted important information

you reverted important information 103.150.26.242 (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored your edits. Next time, Please do not include edit summaries such as "Gud". 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Filmssssssssssss:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging Piermark Socks

Hi,

You might want to leave those socks untagged, please read WP:DENY and this bit about not tagging socks of LTA's. Thanks, Seawolf35 ^T--C 21:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for this 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn/Ultraviolet, AntiVandal, or Huggle

Hi @Filmssssssssssss, I saw you are active in recent changes patrolling, and I appreciate your effort, but I'm wondering why you are not using advanced tools like RedWarn/Ultraviolet, AntiVandal, or Huggle? with those tools it can make your patrolling more efficient. Cjse23 (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Congratulations on being among the top five most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ᛋ

If someone is a descendent of a person, then they are that descendent by said person.

What would a non promotional page look like for: Boris Johnson, since his page is certainly promotional.

His other paternal ancestry includes English, German and French; one of his German ancestors was said to be the illegitimate daughter of Prince Paul of Württemberg and thus a descendant of George II of Great Britain, which was later confirmed on an episode of Who Do You Think You Are?

Who do I think I am? HisDivineHighness (talk) 02:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll delete the tag 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia Fund Wikipedia Page Correction

I am one of the Executives of Armenia Fund, Inc. USA and our current Wikipedia page contains misinformation and an attempt to deceive. The edits we attempted to make were purely for the purpose of maintaining the absolute facts and for removing statements that were not based in credible facts and damaged the image of our organization. 47.46.76.106 (talk) 18:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Food Traceability Software

Hello, Filmssssssssssss,

I noticed that you tagged this draft for speedy deletion but even though you used Twinkle, you didn't post a notification on the page creator's talk page. They are currently blocked but it is a soft block because of their username which could be lifted if they change their name. So, my request is could you please check your Twinkle preferences and see a) that "Notify page creator" box is checked off and b) make sure the boxes for all of the different CSD criteria are also checked off? This would ensure that content creators are notified if articles or drafts they are tagged for deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry

It’s me, WillJSimpson. I just want to let you and the other admins know I’m sorry for vandalizing those pages. I was drinking so much that day, that I didn’t even know what I was doing. WillJacobSimpson (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

سوپرسکس

جنسی Bold 5.124.116.110 (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

۱۱۰ 5.124.116.110 (talk) 22:25, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DaxServer was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rakul Preet Singh instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A very kind and gentle request

List of Vande Bharat Express services is locked for past 4-5 days and hindering other editors to update the proposed services list and some useful edits in updating the launch order which is done wrong firstly in the 9 and 10th vb which is 10th one as 9th and 9th one as 10th and other services also. Pls kindly inform adminstrators to unlock page and best solution to ban the users involved in wrong activities. Omalur Sharma (talk) 15:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanks for reaching out.

Unfortunately, I do not have the rights to unlock the page for editing, as it has been semi protected by an administrator to prevent vandalism. However, you can submit an edit request here 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For how fast you caught on to 2.96.182.81's vandalism. UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes review

Do take the care to review carefully the changes introduced. – robertsky (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky Ok, in the future, I will. Sorry about that 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re. ANI

Admins have already set up filters, the details of which I won't explain here for obvious reasons. Long story short, we can't really prevent them from editing without a large number of false positives. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why’d my response get removed

How was my information irrelevant? Their robotics section is relevant while mine isn’t? Timber Creek High School (Florida) 2600:1006:B035:7A95:ED18:2153:5981:292D (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong

Hi you removed my change. but the original city (Oslo) did not have any citation either. for citation, check out: https://www.proff.no/rolle/bj%C3%B8rn-phamorn-nyland/jessheim/2032697 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxLib1UKeyo 84.214.173.153 (talk) 18:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. In the future, please include this in the edit summary 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Carson

Hello, i’m glad we were both on top of the vandalism occurring at Ben Carson. I was wondering when we use the vandalism-warn template on the IP’s talk page. Does that in turn notify an administrator that there is vandalism going on? It would be helpful so someone with blocking privileges could be immediately made aware of what is going on. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Reports need to be made at AIV following the guidelines 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for the info! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature

Hi Filmssssssssssss. Would you consider using regular text in your signature instead of the mathematical symbols? It makes it more difficult to copy your username. You can get a similar effect using Filmssssssssssss which looks like this: Filmssssssssssss. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add on there are MOS:ACCESSIBILITY concerns - Most non-ASCII characters are illegible to screen readers and will not render on devices lacking compatible fonts. I like the signature though. Awesome Aasim 00:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LTA/BMX

I have a suggestion about that BMX vandal. I think it might be better to leave that user alone, considering that he’s trying to make up such usernames that might be threatening to some of the Wikipedia editors (I’ve been affected too because of that blanking and stuff). Hey. Maybe we need to have a discussion about the whole page blanking and stuff that got reverted by someone. Kinda like what they did in WP:LTA/MRY. Trust me though. In my opinion it’s better to leave the page as it is (or courtesy blanking per WP:DENY) because editing in their LTA page would be one of the examples of feeding the troll. kleshkreikne. T 21:08, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(tps) @Kleshkreikne: Having a discussion is the opposite of leaving them alone. Vandals like this (and there have been many many far worse btw) are interested in reactions and response in their otherwise loveless world. Every time this vandal, and every one like them, are discussed, mentioned, or reverted, every time their LTA page is edited, and every time someone indicates they have been affected by them, the vandal's energy bar gets renewed a little. I suggest ignore in the full and proper sense of the word. Don't talk about them, don't write about them, don't acknowledge them in any way. Literally do something else like improve some encyclopaedia pages. Just my advice and probably the only statement I'll make about this... -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Freelancers in Somalia

Please do not add speedy deletion tags for articles or drafts that have already been previously declined. Thanks. -- 19:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Whpq (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for letting me know Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Filmssssssssssss,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is BBB?

Who is BBB? [[6]] 99.196.135.213 (talk) 22:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see a user with that name. 99.196.135.213 (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LTA, don't do what you did again Filmssssssssssss (talk) 22:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belial

Take a look at Ultraman Belial beforehand. This is completely primary sources. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like a response please. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 00:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will restore your edit Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much 50.113.53.158 (talk) 01:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning timing on IP talk page

Woah, we both gave that vandal IP a level 2 warning at the same time! That's a huge coincidence! The Master of Hedgehogs ^(converse) ^(hedgehogs) 13:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beaver Canyon (Beaver County, Utah)

Hello, Filmssssssssssss. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Beaver Canyon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Probably the millionth time you got one of these but seriously, you're awesome <3 نوح^فث ^{Let's Chat!} 20:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFPP requests

Hi Filmssss; your work on Wikipedia is greatly appreciated, especially as it relates to reporting vandalism. However, may I suggest that you utilize WP:AIV more often? Page protection is certainly the right call for when an article is being brigaded by multiple accounts, but for situations that involved one user or a small IP range, blocking is much preferred to protection. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie. I think this would be better too.

Thanks for letting me know, Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi sir

what did i do to get messages from people and admins sir can you please explain? Dededfrfggh (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dededfrfggh Not only did you trigger our edit filters, but do you think you would see this in a normal Encyclopedia? Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:54, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, not to gang up on you Filmssssssssss, I was here to ask you something, but to be honest, I agree with Dede, Roll Tide, brother!!!! Althought I understand you have a job to do. 2601:14B:4880:A780:DFEE:67F:361E:AE29 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit to the Dodgers, it was truthful. It was not vandalism.

2601:14B:4880:A780:DFEE:67F:361E:AE29 (talk) 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit

Why did you revert my edit to District 22, when it was truthful, John Mannion won the election. 71.176.76.206 (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out, my finger slipped and accidentally reverted your edit. It has been restored.

Apologies, Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]