Talk:Parker Pen Company

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Parker Vector was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 April 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Parker Pen Company. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

2007

"the most prestigious and collectible in the world". There's POV, then there's the really-stretching-it-kind-of-POV. Cmon, you can buy this pen at Staples... with a coupon. The most prestigious? Would anybody throw a fit if I reworded this? -Taco325i 01:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that phrase is both Weaselly and NPOV. By all means please do. Fan-1967 02:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External link

I've removed links to parkerpens.net and Parkercollector.com (note:different URLs, but same site) in the external links section a couple of times. The main reason I removed them was because they had been previously spammed across many different articles by Algabatz (talk · contribs) (once even including both links to the same site). Additionally, the link was self-described as an unofficial fan-site, and, per WP:ELNO, these are to be avoided. I wanted to see what others thought about it. Thanks! Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 15:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parker 51

Claiming that Parker 51 (in 1941) was made to macth Quink properties of dry (created in 1931) has no factual support, so I rephrased the paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bsergio (talk • contribs) 19:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal: Parker Vector to Parker Pen Company

Parker Vector doesn't seem to be independently notable, but would perhaps be worth a mention/redirect here. Boleyn (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Selling price of pen to manufacture

Whole seller and retailer 117.211.145.216 (talk) 07:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Parker 100" just links to this page

Under the "See also" section, there's an entry for the Parker 100, but that link just redirects to the same "See also" section. Should this be removed? JimboMcGrimbo (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revisions

The introduction of this article turned out to be incorrect. Although I've amended it, I'm not very good at coding and wish that more knowledgeable users would fix my citation. 5.151.189.241 (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That Newhaven website is crowdsourced so we can't really depend on it. Also, it's better to edit the article in parts instead of reverting it entirely because there were instances of vandalism. Sir Tragedy (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]