Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex
Welcome to the WikiProject Sussex. This project draws together editors working on all Sussex-related articles, with the aim of improving and expanding all aspects of coverage. There are many articles to deal with, from local newspapers to notable local football teams. Please join us to help these articles become amongst the best on Wikipedia.
Please note, there is a separate project for Brighton and Hove.
Article Alerts
[edit]The following Sussex articles are currently being listed in Wikipedia workflows. Click here for information.
Categories for discussion
- 29 Oct 2024 – Category:Churches in Sussex (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Fayenatic london (t · c); see discussion
- 29 Oct 2024 – Category:Christianity in Sussex (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Fayenatic london (t · c); see discussion
Stubs (West Sussex)
[edit]I have reviewed all the West Sussex geography stubs that I can, reassessed some as start class, and checked that all are on the List of places in West Sussex. There are 109 stubs remaining, some of which are close to being start class. If you de-stub any, please add them to Wikipedia:The 20,000 Challenge. Cheers! Tony Holkham (Talk) 09:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it please click .
- I am not a member of this project and do not wish to be, but would ask that the article Wealden iron industry be reassessed and rerated following its recent revision. Peterkingiron 14:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ashurst Wood - I've done a lot of editing to this article and it's currently rated as a stub. It definitely needs reassessing and as I've made a large set of changes it would be more appropriate if somebody else assessed it. Thanks ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 00:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Kingston near Lewes has been assessed on the UK Geography Wikiproject, but not Wikiproject Sussex. Would it be a good candidate? Autarch (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Kingston was subsequently added. MortimerCat (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hollingbury has been expanded and images added since it was last rated as a stub. Please could you reassess. Hzv5wk (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hassocks is currently unassessed and having a particular interest in the village I would be grateful if someone could have a look at it for me. Many thanks. Paste (talk) 08:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Burgess Hill has not been rated in a fairly long time and it would seem that most of the things of the to do list have been done, if not fully to a notably greater extent. Please could you reassess. Curtis31992 (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- Cowdray House I've just put a significant amount of history into this article, I don't think it is still a stub, as such would be grateful for someone to re-assess it. I've removed the stub assessment so it's currently unassessed. JonEastham (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Has been assessed C. Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Could Littlehampton Redoubt and Shoreham Redoubt please be reassessed? I have added headings, text, images, references and a bibliography to both pages. Are they still stubs? Thank you. Kinnerton (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done.--Charles (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- I've just merged three articles into Trotton with Chithurst (the merger was proposed 3 years ago, I thought someone should actually do it!). Can someone please reassess that article to account for the additional content? Thanks. --Tango (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's now Start class. Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am not a member of the wikiproject but would like you to assess whether Jerwood Gallery in Hastings (http://www.jerwoodgallery.org/about/the-gallery) is notable enough to warrant an article. 72.244.206.38 (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think almost certainly.--Charles (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Just came across this, Sussex is rated as start class with a notice saying that it
lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations
, yet has 137 inline citations and has multiple, detailed sections. Could this be reassessed? Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 19:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC) - Could someone look at Fulking - I think it's moved beyond a stub, and is now perhaps a 'B'. Topo122 (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's now C-class. Tony Holkham (Talk) 16:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- History of Sussex is currently listed as C-class, but I feel like it should be much higher than that - what do others think? Seagull123 Φ 19:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done.----Dorkinglad (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
For further details please go to our assessment page.
Statistics
[edit]| Articles assessed for quality: 99.6% complete | ||
| Sussex-related articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
 FA
|
3 | 11 | 14 | ||||
| FL
|
2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |||
 GA
|
2 | 3 | 22 | 1 | 28 | ||
| B | 4 | 11 | 14 | 154 | 2 | 185 | |
| C | 3 | 13 | 41 | 271 | 8 | 336 | |
| Start | 5 | 18 | 258 | 1,017 | 81 | 1,379 | |
| Stub | 157 | 837 | 2 | 77 | 1,073 | ||
| List | 6 | 9 | 67 | 21 | 103 | ||
| NA | 2 | 98 | 944 | 1,044 | |||
| Assessed | 20 | 44 | 490 | 2,482 | 946 | 190 | 4,172 |
| Unassessed | 13 | 13 | |||||
| Total | 20 | 44 | 490 | 2,482 | 946 | 203 | 4,185 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 15,288 | Ω = 5.07 | |||||
 | Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
| Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
- 3.3% List-Class
- 34.2% Stub-Class
- 43.9% Start-Class
- 10.7% C-Class
- 5.9% B-Class
- 0.9% GA-Class
- 0.8% FA-Class
- 0.4% remaining
- Quality operations: A bot-generated daily log which lists articles Reassessed, Assessed and Removed.
- Popular pages: List of top articles with the most frequent views, updated monthly.
Templates
[edit]Talk pages
[edit]
Use the {{WikiProject Sussex}} template on talk pages of articles which are related to Sussex. Use the code: {{WikiProject Sussex|class=Stub|importance=low|unref=yes}} to produce:
 | Sussex Stub‑class Low‑importance  | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
(the |class= parameter can also be set to Start or C). This project can only rate an article Stub, Start or C. Higher grades involve external input such as peer reviews.
- Stub - An article with a single line or paragraph.
- Start - An article that has grown beyond the single paragraph, and has started to be split into sections.
- C - An article that appears to finished growing. There are no obvious gaps in information, and there are plenty of citations.
When creating a new banner, the importance will probably be low (possibly mid), on the assumption that all important articles will have already been included. The unref=yes should be removed if there a are no referencing issues in the article.
If the article is already associated with another project, multiple projects may be listed using the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template.
Userbox
[edit]
To show that you are a member of the Sussex WikiProject, put the following code on your user page: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Membership}} this transcludes the userbox at {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Membership}} and will produce:
 | This user is a member of WikiProject Sussex. |
Invite
[edit]To invite someone to join the Sussex WikiProject, put the following code on someone's talk page: {{subst:WP Sussex invite}}
Add this template, {{WP Sussex invite}}, to the user page of someone who has shown interest in editing Sussex related articles to invite them to this WikiProject. This shows:
|
|
Hello WikiProject Sussex! You are invited to join WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Sussex in South East England. Come and join us! ~~~~ |
Remember to always subst: this template.
Members
[edit]- Vox Humana 8' (founder)
- Itsmejudith
- Hassocks5489
- A bit iffy
- Paste
- Riparia riparia
- Charlesdrakew
- Peter Shearan
- MortimerCat
- Autarch
- FM (Freakmighty)
- Lordmwa
- Seafordrulez
- JeffreyTBest
- Thatmotorwayguy specialising in the Southern areas of Sussex, contributing to the roads aspect of Sussex, specialising in the A22 and A27
- Kinnerton
- Doug (at Wiki)
- Seagull123
- BoroFan89
- Wilfridselsey
- Pachyderm16
- Tony Holkham - West Sussex particularly
- EddersGTI - Sussex County Football League and Eastbourne Town F.C. plus other little bits
- Polegåarden - covering woodlands in North Horsham
- dorkinglad
- Greyzxq - mostly Brighton
- FusionSub - mainly west sussex
Categories
[edit]Category:WikiProject Sussex articles
- Category:Sussex-related articles by importance
- Category:Sussex-related articles by quality
- Category:Unreferenced Sussex-related articles
Main category: Sussex
Our best work
[edit]Our Featured Articles
[edit]- Ælle of Sussex
- Bodiam Castle
- Hellingly Hospital Railway
- Hilary of Chichester
- List of places of worship in Crawley
- List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in East Sussex
Our Good Articles
[edit]- Case of the Hooded Man
- Central Recreation Ground
- Crawley
- Eastbourne
- Patrick Moore
- River Arun
- River Rother, West Sussex
- Simon Wormull
- St George's Church, Trotton
- St Margaret's Church, Ifield
- Southgate, West Sussex
- The George Hotel, Crawley
- Walter Potter
Useful external links
[edit]- Neighbourhood Statistics
- Dialling codes
- Multimap Gives long/lat, grid ref and Postcode of a place.
- Election Maps Displays various government boundaries. Do a local area search on the District such as Wealden or Rother.
- ESiF Detailed statistics on East Sussex.
- Local history societies in Sussex
- Walking in Sussex
- West Sussex.info
- Historical information and sources on GENUKI
- British History Online (Sussex); University of London
- Open Domesday The 337 places in Sussex detailed in the Domesday Book of 1086.