User talk:Topo122

Hello Topo122! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Porridge (1974 TV series) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 16:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alfriston Market Cross

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alfriston Market Cross you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 14:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alfriston Market Cross

The article Alfriston Market Cross you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alfriston Market Cross for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alfriston Market Cross

The article Alfriston Market Cross you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alfriston Market Cross for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hog Farm -- Hog Farm (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St Peter's Church, Twineham

Hi Topo122; I've just linked this additionally to List of places of worship in Mid Sussex. I'd be interested in helping with Grade I listed buildings in Mid Sussex generally; I have various useful sources which I've simply never got round to using. (Not to mention a lifelong familiarity with the area!!) Cheers, Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Presmably you've seen my proposed Project: Grade I listed buildings in Mid Sussex District. I've begun to develop a way of working to deliver this project, in steps (though I’m not tackling them sequentially).

Step 1: Check there is a page for each civil parish in Mid Sussex. The only missing page is Worth, which needs to be created by splitting Worth, West Sussex into Worth Village, Crawley, and Worth, Mid Sussex (for the civil parish). I’ve started some work on this.
Step 2. Add a section on Listed Buildings and Scheduled Monuments to each civil parish page – see Pyecombe#Listed_Buildings_and_Scheduled_Monuments for an example - or better, Fulking#Landmarks, where I've placed them under the section on 'Landmarks', to follow the guidance in Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.
Step 3. Add a paragraph with a brief description of all Grade I listed building to the civil parish page. See for example Balcombe#St_Mary's_Church and Pyecombe#The_Church_of_the_Transfiguration.
Step 4. Create pages for 'missing' Grade I buildings. St Peter's Church, Twineham is the first. I’ve gathered many sources, and I'll complete the article over the next few days. The remaining 'missing' pages are Stone Hall (list no. 1286412), St Mary's Church, Balcombe (list no 1286412), Church of The Holy Trinity, Poynings (list no. 1285135) and Saint Margaret's Convent, East Grinstead (list no. 1248986). I've also started to add a 'Statement of Notability' to the talk pages of articles I create – something that ought to be standard practice on Wikipedia.
Step 5. Review articles on Grade I buildings that already have their own page against 'Good Article' criteria, and edit if necessary.
Step 6. Propose articles for 'Good Article' status.

Any help welcome, though I'd rather like to complete St Peter's, given the work I've done on it so far. Topo122 (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grahame Farr

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grahame Farr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 22:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grahame Farr

The article Grahame Farr you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grahame Farr for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Grahame Farr

The article Grahame Farr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grahame Farr for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 04:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]