Jump to content

User talk:FlightTime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a member of the Wikimedia volunteer response team.
This user has been editing Wikipedia for at least fifteen years.
This user has file mover rights on the English Wikipedia
This user is a global renamer.
This user uses IRC.
This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has template editor rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has been editing Wikipedia for at least ten years.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Status:    (Around)


This is Buddy,
My very best friend
This is Daisy,
Buddy's best friend


Welcome To My User Page
FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights)

FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)

FlightTime Public (talk · contribs · count)

Topic Subscriptions
Show all my user sub-pages
dif tor heh smusma
peace and long life


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 21:06, 8 November 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Welcome To My Alternate Talk Page
FlightTime ( talk · contribs · count · accounts · move log · global rename log · uploads · logs · rights)
It is 5:20 PM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. (Purge)


Revert on Arnold Schwarzenegger

[edit]

@FlightTime: Hello, you reverted an edit of mine @ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&oldid=prev&diff=1252573621

Would you please explain how this item: "Schwarzenegger saved a drowning man in 2004 while on vacation in Hawaii by swimming out and bringing him back to shore." belongs in this section: "Accidents and injuries". All the other examples relate directly to an accident or injury of Schwarzenegger himself.

My edit comment was "interesting fact, but clearly not an accident or an injury." Your revert comment was "Removal of sourced content without discussion" which did not relate at all to my edit comment. I am sure that either of us can come up with an enormous list of material that, even though properly sourced, does not belong in articles, etc.

If it said in Accidents and injuries that Schwarzenegger drives a Honda Civic, and that was properly sourced, you would object to it being removed? It definitely did not belong in that section, so I removed it. Would you please consider removing it again? Or I will be happy to discuss further.

Thank you  • Bobsd •  (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobsd: My edit summary says exactly why I reverted your edit. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FlightTime: How about taking the time to reply to my questions? Are you saying that "saving a drowning man" properly belongs in a section about "Accidents and injuries" to Schwarzenegger? That any properly sourced sentence, about anything, could be placed in that section and an editor should not remove it because it is sourced, without a discussion on the talk page?  • Bobsd •  (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Monkees

[edit]

Why did you revert the change on the Monkees page that gave the correct album title? If you don't have a compelling reason, your reversion needs to be undone. Sm5574 (talk) 19:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]