User talk:Gaismagorm

hi

Blockchain analysis

Regarding the recent removal you made about Blockchain Intelligence Group, they are an industry leader, and I can confidently say they are one of the top companies in blockchain analytics solutions. They have well-known tools like QLUE and offer crypto investigation training such as the CCI certification. In fact, they were recognized by Homeland Security in 2022.

It would be greatly appreciated if you could add this information back. Thank you, and have a wonderful day.

Do you have a source that corroborates this claim? Gaismagorm (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again.

here is the BIG's own PR: https://blockchaingroup.io/announcements/crypto-investigative-support-company-recognized-in-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/

here is the official tweet from U.S Homeland security and Blockchain Intelligence group: https://twitter.com/HSI_HQ/status/1640365835997913093

here is the financial post official website: https://financialpost.com/globe-newswire/crypto-investigative-support-company-recognized-in-u-s-department-of-homeland-security 66.23.116.246 (talk) 17:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, while the first two are likely not enough, the third definitely is compelling. It does however seem like it still isn't notable enough, especially considering the group lacks a wikipedia article. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gaismagorm,

Blockchain Intelligence Group is only the public trader blockchain analysis solution company in the world. I think base on that, it worth to mentioned on this page.

here is article about this company on coingeek: https://coingeek.com/bigg-digital-assets-inc-subsidiary-blockchain-intelligence-group-launches-bitcoin-sv-bsv-on-qlue-and-bitrank-verified-forensics-platforms/

here is the article that mentioned BIGG (parent company): https://investingnews.com/daily/tech-investing/blockchain-investing/cse-blockchain-stocks/

Thank you. 66.23.116.246 (talk) 17:27, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

like I said, I don't think it should be added until the company is notable enough for a wikipedia article. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. However I found out this wiki page which includes Blockchain Intelligence multi-times and : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envion 66.23.116.246 (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, actually reading the old article the change was, most of the companies mentioned don't have articles. This is honestly way over my head right now. Also sorry for the late reply, was in a car so I didn't have wifi. Gaismagorm (talk) 12:03, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All good. Thank you to taking care of this. I'm contact them if they can create an wiki page for it. They are a really great company. I'm a customer since 4 years. have a wonderful day. 66.23.116.246 (talk) 17:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you too! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again.

here is the BIG's own PR: https://blockchaingroup.io/announcements/crypto-investigative-support-company-recognized-in-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/

here is the official tweet from U.S Homeland security and Blockchain Intelligence group: https://twitter.com/HSI_HQ/status/1640365835997913093

here is the financial post official website: https://financialpost.com/globe-newswire/crypto-investigative-support-company-recognized-in-u-s-department-of-homeland-security

Warning users

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 11:11, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, i will do that from now own. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Given as a token of appreciation from one Wikimedian to another for helping combat the scourge of vandalism. MeadeIndeed (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you Gaismagorm (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it, keep up the good work! :> MeadeIndeed (talk) 16:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

aaaaaa.. i am glad i hurt you sooo much to the point that you are writing about me 2601:646:9D81:CA70:9EA6:D438:8CE8:9CF8 (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okily dokily neighbourino Gaismagorm (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This had nothing to do with you, obviously, as it was given in Nov 2023.

Taking part in vandalizing something as important as Wikipedia is the most pathetic thing a human can do with their time on this Earth, this website is a repository of knowledge meant to help mankind (that includes you), not to mention that you and others like you steal time from people tho volunteer to keep this place running.

Do something better with your life. MeadeIndeed (talk) 13:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

awesomesauce Gaismagorm (talk) 15:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

about gambia list

yeah changed my mind on it. the populations are all either hard to find sources on or they all come from different years Gaismagorm (talk) 14:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up notice

Thank you for your advisory note on my article. May I suggest that you clean up your clean up notice? 'encyclopediacly' is not a word. I have amended the spelling of 'writter' to 'written', but I am not sure if this correction appears on all uses of your notice. You may care to check this out. The article did have a reference section, although there was no 'References' heading. You may want to change how you use that function. Shipsview (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uh yeah that was my fault. But I stand by what I said. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also the lack of the references heading was indeed what I was talking about, but i will try to fix my clean up template. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright it's fixed, and i removed the reference thing cause that was fixed. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff! Shipsview (talk) 08:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 10:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to User talk:Discospinster—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zero^talk 22:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh shoot, hold in I'll check I might've made a mistake Gaismagorm (talk) 22:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I'm a little confused on the issue @Patient Zero Gaismagorm (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unless it's me removing others talk page messages, then my bad, I'll stop with that (I just thought it was okay if the messages I were removing we personal attacks) Gaismagorm (talk) 22:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am terribly sorry. I appear to have been trying to revert the transphobia/attacks at the same time as you. I will redact these warnings shortly. Best, Patient Zero^talk 22:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah I see, no worries! Gaismagorm (talk) 22:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your understanding and civility in your response! I'll see if there's an issue with the tool I am using, as that shouldn't be happening. Patient Zero^talk 22:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright, have a great day! Gaismagorm (talk) 22:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You too! :-) Patient Zero^talk 22:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 22:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for editing Wikipedia and making it better! Now you have been awarded 2 barnstars. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 19:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Gaismagorm (talk) 19:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nuns Island Theatre

Hello, Draft:Nuns Island Theatre isn't advertising, so I removed the G11 tag that you added. The article seems to be neutral, but I moved it to draft because it didn't have enough references. G11 is only for unambiguous advertising. If an article sems to be advertising but you think other users would disagree, you can tag the article as {{advert}} so that other editors will see the tag and perhaps improve the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah ok my bad, i'll make sure to do that next time! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really ugly vandalism

Hey there! Thanks for your work in removing vandalism from Wikipedia. One of the edits you reverted recently was a really ugly racial slur that someone dropped into Western suburbs (Melbourne). If you see something like that, please find an admin and ask for the edit to be "revision deleted", usually abbreviated "revdel". This removes the edit from the history of the page. We can revdel the edit itself, the edit summary, and/or the editor's username, depending on the circumstances. Thanks again! Joyous! Noise! 00:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should I email them? or is there a way to do that otherwise doesn't require email? Gaismagorm (talk) 00:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emailing is best practice, because often we're trying to get the edit removed without a lot of fuss, to avoid "feeding the troll" by giving them attention for their edits, but if you don't use email with Wikipedia, you can drop a subtle message at an admin's talk page. There's a list of admins who are especially willing to handle revdel requests, although any admin could either handle it themself, or flag the attention of someone who will. Joyous! Noise! 02:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright, I'll be sure to do that. have a great day! Gaismagorm (talk) 10:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question, sir

How do you make hyperlinks so that they don't show the whole title as it's listened in the hyperlink but rather the words you want to show it. For instance for my Bruce A Young article, I wanted to downcut the display of CTV Television Network to CTV (to make it proper-looking, without removing the link) for the 1996 - 1999 UPN/CTV show "The Sentinel". I want to do the same for like "Richard Bey." RobertFL1991 (talk) 23:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RobertFL1991

so it depends.

for links that link to articles on wikipedia you do [ [ wikipedia article name|display text ] ]

for links that lead to websites outside of wikipedia you do { { display text|website url } }

be sure to remove the spaces between the brackets, I just did it cause it was inserting links when I tried to send the message.

for more info check out Help:Link

do note that some websites such as imdb have their own syntax for linking due to their extensive usage.

hope this helps! Gaismagorm (talk) 00:35, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) RobertFL1991 (talk) 00:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, glad to help! Gaismagorm (talk) 01:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need help with something

when editing articles, I have a hard time positioning the picture I want to put in the middle on the main info box at the beginning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_A._Young Notice how the picture isn't positioned right? I had trouble putting the The Richard Bey Show logo as well in the past. RobertFL1991 (talk) 03:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes I can see that, but im not quite certain how to fix the issue. I'd reccomend going to the wikipedia:teahouse. there you can ask these kinds of questions and get help from many people. hope this helps! Gaismagorm (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not understanding why my page doesn't get a simple approval

I would like people to see it and if they want to add more sources to strengthen the page, they could, but it's like I can't get a start.

Warning users

Hi Gaismagorm. When warning users, you should make sure to include the article that the warning is about. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 20:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright i'll do that! Gaismagorm (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

Hi Gaismagorm,

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

regarding Special:Diff/1226282915,

Did you check the source before restoring the material?
Are you aware of WP:BLPPRIMARY?

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:26, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah that was my bad, I'll make sure not to do that next time, whoops! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and no worries! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

have a great day! Gaismagorm (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

external links

Hi, could you help me with the external links on this page ? I don't understand what I'm doing wrong.

Hard Home (film) Freavene (talk) 01:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can certainly try, what's the issue? Gaismagorm (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

also sorry for the late reply Gaismagorm (talk) 13:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi, t'y, someone corrected it but I still don't understand how to add external links Freavene (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here, this should help.

Wikipedia:External links#How to link Gaismagorm (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how do you post pictures from Commons onto an article?

I want to add a picture of 1 MetroTech Center into the article about Brooklyn and being this site takes copyright very seriously, I just want to add a picture that can be of some use. Am I allowed to edit the picture, or it must be used. Thank you to whoever adjusted the picture of Bruce A. Young, the actor for me. RobertFL1991 (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RobertFL1991!

while I myself haven't uploaded any images, I do believe the article Wikipedia:Uploading images should hopefully provide the information necessary. Sorry I don't much further, but I hope that helps! Gaismagorm (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Just download from Commons and let them know. RobertFL1991 (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if thats what it says, then yeah! Gaismagorm (talk) 19:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not let them know, but all you have to do is just indicate that it was from Commons, and then give the indicated Commons # like whatever specs it was. RobertFL1991 (talk) 22:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are confused, I'd reccomend wikipedia:Teahouse, honestly I know very little about image policy on wikipedia. Gaismagorm (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm good. I loaded the picture already anyways. I did it the right way. RobertFL1991 (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright, good! Gaismagorm (talk) 12:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet

Hello there. ItsCheck the 2nd is not my alt account. Please disregard anything that they have stated. ItsCheck (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsCheck alright, thanks! I kinda got that impression from them. you should probably report them. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nevermind, they were blocked. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has been repeatedly making alts and trying to get me into trouble. What can I do? ItsCheck (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im not particularly sure, I'd reccomend asking at the wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Helpdesk. My first idea however for where you should report them is possibly Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. I'm not fully certain however, and I'd reccomend asking on the teahouse or help desk before posting a sockpuppet investigation, since I could be wrong. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible violation of WP:DR and spirit of WP:AGF at Talk:Jinn

Hi there. I'm part of part of couple of months long going dispute and preparation for RfC at Jinn, (starting around here). At the suggestion of Bookku (here), I was wondering if you could take a look at this post by VenusFeuerFalle and see if you find it in breach of WP:DR spirit of WP:AGF as Bookku (our informal dispute facilitator) and myself do. Example:

I am willing to give the involved users one last chance, to make one clear suggestion, I want to respond one last time. Then we can go step by step over to the other ones. If it fails, I will not reply to that anymore, and then either the edits meet the Wiki-Criteria or they don't. If they do not meet them, they will be reverted, no matter of you understand the reason or not. Because, I just feel my time being wasted. If the users again derail the discussions, I will report Eagle and let an admin check on all involved users for canvassing, harrassment, and potential sockpuppetry.

Many thanks if you can. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Louis P. Boog I am terribly sorry, but I am not an administrator. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's fine, don't worry about. I honestly found it mildly amusing (not the situation but me being confused with being an admin) Gaismagorm (talk) 01:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey! Thanks for your feedback on my edits so far. When you left a thanks for my edit on Esther, that really helped me get that you just want to give constructive feedback. It can be easy for me to feel attacked so I need level headed and constructive criticism. I hope to take your feedback and make even more constructive edits in the future, and to do my best to adhere to clarity and Wikipedia policy. Thanks! UncattyValley2000 (talk) 17:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no problem, happy editing! Gaismagorm (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A big thank you!

I wanted to let you know I am thankful for how you were to resolve the misunderstanding so I wanted to come here to wish you a big thank you! 98.235.155.81 (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm just glad to help! Gaismagorm (talk) 19:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gaismagorm

Re- Johan Jacobs, all lawn and indoor bowls players on wikipedia are listed as bowls. example here-Category:English male bowls players. The term bowler could refer to tenpin bowling or a bowler in cricket. Thanks Pipesmoking Legend (talk) 15:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pipesmoking Legend what? Did I do something wrong I'm confused? Gaismagorm (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which page are you talking about, sorry if I accidentally reverted an edit of yours Gaismagorm (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wait nevermind I figured it out, yeah my bad! Gaismagorm (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the Pay4Me App

Hello Gaismagorm,

Can you check if the page Pay4Me App to remove the conflict of interest template. A significant changes have happened and a contributor re-edited the article.

Thank you. InspirErnest (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

while I can't really promise to remove it, I'll take a look to see if I should Gaismagorm (talk) 10:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

actually, it looks like there isn't a conflict of interest template, merely a paid editing template. It does appear that promotional language does still appear within the article, so I'm inclined to not remove it. Thanks for asking first though! Gaismagorm (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the honest feedback. I will take a deep look and re-work it. InspirErnest (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

alright thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 20:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-worked the promotional language, Gaismagorm, kindly check now. Also, can you help me edit it if you feel the page still has promotional language. Thank you InspirErnest (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed up some of the links, and removed a typo. anyways I removed the tag as the page now looks good, thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 11:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I am grateful InspirErnest (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	The award is pretty self-explanatory. Thank you! نوح^فث ^{Let's Chat!} 17:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks so much! Gaismagorm (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gaismagorm

i tried to find another way to contact you but chouldent. im just here to say i understand fixing up my edit to the Sleepy hollow, new york, article with the games section wheare i added "* Sleepy Hollow is a Halloween location in the roblox game Guts and Blackpowder (2023)." im here to say im fine with it but that it is a location in the game (or atleast the cemetary is) and it's currently on the front page of the game. thank you for understanding. contact me when possible :D. Benji is Cool (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Benji is Cool hello, I understand where you are coming from. It is however important to note that Wikipedia has a notability requirement (see Wikipedia:Notability) and Roblox games generally don't meet this requirement (with a few exceptions to extremely popular ones). While Guts and Blackpowder seems to be relatively popular, it is still not quite popular enough to be notable enough to be featured on the list. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks gais. but can you atleast put it as "in roblox"? like generally? thanks in advance. Benji is Cool (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, due to Roblox being filled with user-generated content, stating that the location appears in Roblox is far too vague. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Thank you

Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yipee! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Recent Changes patrolling! Also do you use any tools? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do, I use Twinkle! It's really helpful for reverting multiple edits at once, and also warning users! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same, although I also use Wikipedia:Ultraviolet on PC. Patrolling is a bit difficult on mobile to be honest. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, fair enough. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How long have you been patrolling? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Idk, a year perhaps. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing for longer but I started really patrolling around a year ago Gaismagorm (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you made any big edits, like 2000+ bytes edit? Also you may notice I don't have a great track record like you do if you look at my talk page ':D. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made pretty big edits (though the big ones are usually just reverts of spam or blankings). Also it looks like you've turned over a new leaf it seems, good job! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is your name coloured anyway? Like it's a cyanish blue. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a signature. I've only recently got it. Check out Wikipedia:Signature tutorial if you want to learn how to do so. Also check out Wikipedia:Signatures for the guidelines for signatures. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it works! Sangsangaplaz (talk to me! I'm very lonely) 15:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! Gaismagorm (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Gaismagorm! The thread you created at the Teahouse, What to do about a broken AFD, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dang. I wonder why I don't always get these. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) These are new, the bot was just approved on 20 October. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ah okay thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Franson

Fine. Whatever. 216.168.91.124 (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases

In the media: Summons issued for Wikipedia editors by Indian court, "Gaza genocide" RfC close in news, old admin Gwern now big AI guy, and a "spectrum of reluctance" over Australian place names

Recent research: SPINACH: AI help for asking Wikidata "challenging real-world questions"

News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024

Traffic report: Well, let us share with you our knowledge, about the electoral college

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]