User talk:RobertFL1991

Welcome!

Hello, RobertFL1991, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Gaismagorm (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. RobertFL1991 (talk) 23:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney/Epcot Center Drive moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Walt Disney/Epcot Center Drive. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:22, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need it renamed though, to Walt Disney World Connector Highways RobertFL1991 (talk) 04:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disney Parks Connector Highways (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Disney Parks Connector Highways and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobertFL1991! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Gaismagorm. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:History of UPN that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to WWOR-TV have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WXTV-DT. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More of the same in contributions like this "Advertising" section you created at Six Flags Great Adventure, which was eventually spotted and removed. Aside from grammatical issues, you didn't provide any sources, which according to Wikipedia's Verifiability policy is a requirement for material that is likely to be challenged. Unless you are adding a statement that is considered a form of common knowledge (e.g. "Julius Caesar was a Roman"), you should always cite a reliable source. If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page or reach out to other experienced Wikipedians at the Teahouse. Continuing down this path without seeking assistance, however, will lead to stronger warnings and may result in a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine so I can't put the advertising, but why did you remove the entrance, connector part? RupertNY245 (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

???, are you on the right userpage @RupertNY245 Gaismagorm (talk) 18:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about Six Flags. RupertNY245 (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Adventure page? RupertNY245 (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RupertNY245 yeah, but your account hasn't made any edits to that page, User:RobertFL1991 did. So why are you saying the you can't put the advertising in. Gaismagorm (talk) 18:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My account is because for some reason I lost access to my old accounts, both of them. I am the same guy.

I never was banned. RupertNY245 (talk) 20:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This response seems to indicate you still don't understand the importance of reliable sources and why you should cite them in almost every case. Let's look at two simple examples. There's a big difference between writing, "In 1933, Babe Ruth hit the first home run in the history of the All Star Game.", versus writing, "The capital of France is Paris." The Babe Ruth claim would be an example of material likely to be challenged and would require a source. On the other hand, the Paris claim would not require a citation, since it is generally accepted that most would not consider it controversial. The information is easy to verify if needed.

Another editor removed your "entrance" section, but I also agree with its removal. We have another policy on Wikipedia that states, "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. You can read more there, but in a nutshell it's telling you that being true and verifiable does not automatically mean something is suitable for inclusion. It must also hold encyclopedic value. An article about a famous song won't include all the song lyrics, for example. Citing sources helps. They help determine what material is important. Your entrance description might be more suitable for a brochure or travel guide, but not an encyclopedia, unless you can show that sources believe there is something significant about this aspect.

One final note. I noticed you replied with a different account. Please be aware of Wikipedia's username policy regarding the use of multiple accounts and your responsibility to identify why you have them. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot my password is why. RupertNY245 (talk) 20:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never gotten in trouble on this site. RupertNY245 (talk) 20:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now understand why your earlier contributions were removed? If not, there is plenty there for you to read through and digest. Ask for assistance if you need it, and take this opportunity to begin citing sources with your contributions. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What contributions? You mean Six Flags? RupertNY245 (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What contributions are you talking about specifically? Because this is starting to smell like stupidity. RupertNY245 (talk) 21:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fine so I can't put the advertising, but why did you remove the entrance, connector part"

I know it was a long time ago, but I gotcha covered... GoneIn60 (talk) 21:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Disney Parks Connector Highways

Hello, RobertFL1991. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Disney Parks Connector Highways, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]