User talk:InspirErnest

Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:InspirErnest. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=InspirErnest|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line, so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

somee of the text was unreferenced, and the only references you gave were just quoting Adah, not exactly an independent third-party source

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

It's difficult to establish notability when you have no proper refs. The company appears to have no headquarters, employees, turnover, investment or profit, or any other real facts beyond what it sells.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

that helps international students and immigrants complete cross-border payments that's what he says, no independent research into its effectiveness is given; so just looks like promo

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.

Your text is littered with external links, shouldn't be any, only wikilinks

You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.

If you have a conflict of interest, you must disclose the nature of that COI. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:02, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Shiloh Godson

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shiloh Godson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday Paul Adah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sunday Paul Adah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ARandomName123,

Here was where I handled the possible Conflict of Interest. Sunday Paul Adah is the owner of this company.

16:03, 29 November 2023‎ InspirErnest talk contribs‎ 28 bytes +28‎ ←Created page with '

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Pay4Me App for their contributions to Wikipedia.

'

Does this solve the issue? InspirErnest (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that's sufficient disclosure, but you still need to go through the Articles for Creation process, where another editor will review your article, and publish it if it meets the minimum requirements. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:47, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunday Paul Adah (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by B.Korlah was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject reads more like an advertisement, kindly write in an encyclopaedic form. Thank you

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sunday Paul Adah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

B.Korlah (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InspirErnest! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! B.Korlah (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]