User talk:Jeraxmoira

Welcome!

Hi Jeraxmoira! I noticed your contributions to Gameplay of Pokémon and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Hey Blaze, Thank you for the warm welcome :) Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work adding references to Destiny (2006 film) J04n(talk page) 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you J04n, this means a lot <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

On Achi, Enugu

Hi @Jeraxmoira: I saw your message. If what I added is not allowed, no issues. I happen to come from that town and the things I added were things I know for sure - the notable people and a school. I don't readily have references for such. Azunna4u (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey @Azunna4u, please go through No original research policy once. Per Verifiability, there needs to be a reliable source supporting the information that you are adding. Jeraxmoira (talk) 19:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks note

Thank you very much Supriyomj16022008 (talk) 13:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

UAA

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Got it, Thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Suresh Selvarajan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Suresh Selvarajan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suresh Selvarajan has been accepted

Suresh Selvarajan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ferdinand Jan Ormeling Sr. has been accepted

Ferdinand Jan Ormeling Sr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Gunter has been accepted

Jack Gunter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanka Bandaranayake has been accepted

Lanka Bandaranayake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 12:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification

I knew that was what you meant. I felt it important to depersonalise anything that might be construed as personal.

Thank you as well for your collegial approach to this new article. Whatever the outcome I am pleased to have met you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:01, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding, Tim. Fair to say that I've learned a lot in the last couple of days. I'm really glad we crossed paths through this article. Your patience in guiding newcomers is truly admirable. <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Draftification

Hey! I noticed that you draftified G Squad to draftspace. WHen doing so, please remember to tag the redirect that is left behind for speedy deletion under R2 of the speedy deletion criteria. I believe there is a script that will do all of this for you however i don't have the link for it at the moment. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 14:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I have just installed the tool. Thank you for letting me know. I'm not sure if you remember, but you were the first one to welcome me on Wikipedia. Hope you are doing good <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

scrolls up Huh, so I was! What a coincidence lol. I am doing well. Glad to see that you installed the tool. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 15:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

Hey, I saw you G5'ed List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh and then an edit conflict on my AfD nomination resulted in me overwriting your CSD tag with twinkle. I thought I'd let you know that you're welcome to add anything at the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and nominations received by Rakul Preet Singh but if you wanted to throw the tag back on the page, I'm not opposed to that either.

Cheers, microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Ended up retagging myself. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi MicrobiologyMarcus. It's all good, no worries. I think it was only moved from draft but not created during the block so I guess G5 doesn't apply here. I'll drop a comment on the AfD, thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 21:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Jeraxmoira, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Jeraxmoira. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Jeraxmoira,

I'm pinging Rosguill because I'm concerned that you have this user right. You just took a stub article, blanked the page and tagged it as a CSD G7, which it was not, was a completely inappropriate tagging. I don't think you fully understand the criteria for speedy deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:39, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

And in the discussion below this one, I see another admin removed a tag you placed on an article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Not exactly sure if this is about Blossom Maduafokwa. The revdel was completed by an admin on this. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey Liz. The stub article created by the same editor was already declined at Draft:Chandler Redmond 3 days back and it only has a single database entry. I couldn't move it since it already exists as a draft, and I didn't want to leave a redirect, so I chose to G7 it. I opted for a G7 deletion because when I moved Mark Maasen previously, it was deleted under G7. Could you please let me know which criteria accurately applies here? Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

G7 is not appropriate here, that's for self-requested deletion of an article you created. It also arguably wasn't appropriate for the move cleanup of Mark Maasen--G6 would have been more appropriate here. In the case of Chandler Redmond, unless you specifically suspect undisclosed COI/UPE editing, you should not insist that an editor (even a new editor) use AfC and should instead proceed to AfD if the subject does not meet notability guidelines. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Help

Hi Friend Jeraxmoira, Noticed the tag you placed on the article I just created, How do you wish I improved on it? I have done some copyediting to reduce the infringement. Can you kindly help on areas you think to improve on it? Or do you suggest I do more copyediting?Odirichi2024 (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Odirichi2024, The {{Copyvio-revdel}} tag, which will notify the administrators to delete the revision history containing the copyrighted text. I've already removed the copyrighted content from the article.

Regarding the improvement, I believe you've already rephrased it. Cheers Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

• Hi, friend Jeraxmoira Noticed an admin has removed the tag you placed. Thank you for the help, Patient and enlightenment I really appreciate. I believe I have alots to learn from you.Odirichi2024 (talk) 22:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

BasiGo draft review request.

Hello could you kindly review Draft:BasiGo. It was declined last week but after making changes the reviewer said it was fine but couldn't review again and accept to be fair to everyone else. It has been a week now I don't know what to do. Apologies if I have not followed any correct protocols. Kindly assist. Thank you. Serrwinner (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Serrwinner. Thank you for reaching out to me, but I am not an AfC reviewer. You can see from the notice at the top of the draft that there are 565 pending submissions waiting for review, and they are reviewed in no particular order. Right now, all we can do is wait. Cheers <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for the reply and helping out by editing it. Cheers Serrwinner (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello once more. Thanks for helping out in improving the article. It really means a lot. I found a few articles linked to it in other pages as shown in the talk page. Is it now safe to remove the tag indicating it's an orphan article? Serrwinner (talk) 06:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I have removed it. It will be easier if you have Twinkle installed. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of sock's page

I'm going to leave it un-salted for now. It's an easy honeypot. DMacks (talk) 05:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Makes sense, thank you <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aubrey Sekhabi has been accepted

Aubrey Sekhabi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 17:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

For Help

Salute to you, elder brother, on the page created by me, Ruhaan Rajput, Mr. CNMall41 had put a quick deletion on it, which you had deleted by saying that it was wrong. Now again they have deleted the page edited by me. Please help me. Thank you TechsonNet (talk) 10:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi TechsonNet. I never removed the deletion tag. I believe it was User:Vishalwikiji who removed it. [1]. Jeraxmoira (talk) 12:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

I need advice

hi, I am reaching out because I have been practicing (as you know by now I guess) in an area where I am interested, which is film producers, Canadian ones and those who work between the states and Canada.

Can I ask for some advice on my Jeff Sackman page that I started last week ? I have priced my information from many articles that I referenced and used your advice to keep it neutral by deleting certain things.

Is there anyway you have time to review it for me and critique it? After removing what you suggested and rewording, there's a tag on there for "advert" and that is not my intention.

Before I start working on a new one, I want to get this right.

Thank you, happy new year. Any help would he appreciated.

Colinwhite613 (talk) 21:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey Colinwhite613. I would need some time to look at it again.For more information about articles reading like an advert, please see WP:SOAPBOX. Jeraxmoira (talk) 04:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

i went through it and realized some angles of writing could easily look that way. I made changes. One was I wrote that subject when he was president of a co.psny grew the income exponentially... That was probably a mistake. I remove for. Rephrased it. I found another part too when I mention movies he was "known for" and realized they are just movies on his list of credits. Nothing more. Just facts.

I read several articles after I had messaged you to make sure things were more neutral and went over it again. So hopefully someone will review it again Colinwhite613 (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

And thank you. I want to keep learning Colinwhite613 (talk) 04:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Jeraxmoira: I saw your orphan article tag. I have now linked the page to related articles. Thank you.--Applehead1000 (talk) 08:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hananya Naftali

Hey @Jeraxmoira, I noticed you added the external link category in the draft article Hananya Naftali. I want to bring to your attention that the external link to X doesn't lead to any page there. Can you please modify it? Olivia Harry (talk) 17:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done. I placed the entire URL instead of the username in the ID field. Thank you for bringing this to my notice. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for contributing

 Olivia Harry (talk) 18:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my very first wiki article!

It was my first article, and I was nervous to get everything neatly done. De-orphaned as you suggested, I'm still getting a hang of this. We'll keep in touch! TepeyacPilgrim (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi TepeyacPilgrim. Thank you for creating Hacienda Demiñho. Some paragraphs are still left without citations and it would be great if you could reference them as well. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Tieku (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KeepItGoingForward was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Tieku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KeepItGoingForward (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Jeraxmoira! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KeepItGoingForward (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

IMbesharam

Hello. I saw you removed Wikiproject Internet from that article. Could you please explain why did you remove that? CometVolcano (talk) 14:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

I believe 3-4 relevant Wikiprojects are enough for an article. You seem to have a better understanding of Wikipedia policies and DYK nominations for a fairly new account. Have you had any previous experience editing Wikipedia? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

See Talk:Nykaa and Talk:Flipkart. They are also under Wikiproject Internet. --CometVolcano (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, they are under Wikiproject Internet. I hope you noticed of my second question as well; could you share some details about your prior experience editing Wikipedia? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

If Nykaa and Flipkart being internet companies can be included under Wikiproject Internet, why not IMbesharam? --CometVolcano (talk) 15:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

If you are going to ignore questions that do not suit your agenda, then this will be my last reply to you. Have you had any previous accounts or prior experience editing Wikipedia? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Jeraxmoira. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – robertsky (talk) 01:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank You

I saw the message and I will try to be at Teahouse. I really appreciate this 65.18.28.193 (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anveshi Jain (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anveshi Jain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 09:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Anveshi Jain has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anveshi Jain. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 08:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anveshi Jain has been accepted

Anveshi Jain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– SJ + 05:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

TamilNet

Regarding your removal of TamilNet citations from my article submission: TamilNet has been deemed a qualified source by admins here, and is allowed to be and has been used on Wikipedia, provided explicit attribution is given for controversial claims. However, the articles I cited are only quoting public statements reported elsewhere, and are not opinion pieces. --- Petextrodon (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Petextrodon: Thank you for linking Wikipedia:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation/Sources. It clearly states that it should be used with attribution, but I don't see any attribution in the article. Are you going to add it now? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I will try to find better sources, but as you can see from the archived links I’ve used elsewhere in the article, many old articles have since become dead links and may not be publicly accessible via web search engines, though that doesn’t mean TamilNet was just making up stuffs when they were openly attributing statements to public figures. Other news sites have cited one of the quotes from TamilNet I used: https://www.oneindia.com/2006/04/15/slanka-army-says-foils-attack-violence-simmers-1145084856.html

I don't mind adding "according to pro-rebel TamilNet" before every sentence citing it, but I thought that would kill the flow of the article and would be unnecessary given that the quotes are already attributed to individuals/groups. --- Petextrodon (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

I've now added the explicit attributions. I'd appreciate it if you could also review my article for approval. Thanks, --- Petextrodon (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Child redirects

Hi, Jeraxmoira. I've deleted the redirects Akaay Kohli and Vamika Kohli. I understand your worry that they may be repeatedly recreated as articles by the gossip brigade, so to prevent that, I have salted them against recreation. Hope that addresses your concerns. Bishonen | tålk 13:28, 21 February 2024 (UTC).

Bishonen: Yes, I believe salting is a better solution, thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I have many questions to you

Dear Jeraxmoira, I've noticed your extensive experience as a Wikipedian and was wondering if it would be possible to communicate with you privately online. If this isn't permissible, I'm more than willing to ask my questions publicly. However, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide an email address or another form of contact so that I can reach out to you directly. 2001:8A0:74E4:6401:BCDE:68E7:50C7:8167 (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

It is permissible, but unless you are sharing private information, I don't see the need for emails. Either way, I do not know how to access the wiki email and have never explored it. May I ask what this is about? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

new question

Thank you again! Could you please also check this draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bhavana_studios ? 2001:8A0:74E4:6401:BCDE:68E7:50C7:8167 (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Jeraxmoira,

I realize that you are also an AFC reviewer and choose which draft articles to review but there is an unofficial guideline for page patrollers that states newly created articles shouldn't be tagged for deletion until at least an hour after a content creator has stopped editing unless there is egregious content like a copyright violation or BLP-violating content. I'm not sure how many articles you have created, but I'm sure you can empathize, especially with brand new editors who are just learning how to edit. If you have just offered a review of their draft, you might consider allowing them time to respond to your review of what they have written. Again, if there is unacceptable content, it should be tagged immediately. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Liz. Thank you for letting me know. I thought we had to wait 10 minutes before placing CSD A tags on new articles from this NPP flowchart and the 60-minute guideline for WP:DRAFTIFY. Is this related to Lawrence Puliyanath or just in general? I believe it had 98% copyvio on Earwigs and I saw multiple warnings on their talk page, so I tagged it. I will try to be more considerate and assume good faith going forward. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anupama Srinivasan has been accepted

Anupama Srinivasan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

She was ^afairy 06:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Apology

I owe you an apology of what I have reacted at the AN. In future, I will work as an ordinary editor with no rights. I will get accustomed to the community and learn new things. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 16:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

FWIW, you don't owe me an apology or anything of that sort. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Holding_Company

@Jeraxmoira International Holding Company this page was published again 83.8.96.15 (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

It may be notable at this point. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:37, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NuEdge_Development

NuEdge Development here is another spam 83.8.96.15 (talk) 18:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

For you

		The Half Barnstar
		This is my second barnstar given and I'll be honest, I got riled up at the AfD discussion at times. We certainly have opposed viewpoints, but whatever the outcome, this has been both an interesting and extensive discussion that has brought me closer to policies, guidelines, essays, even WikiProjects I was previously never aware of. TLAtlak 13:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for your diligence with all this recent sock/UPE mess and pushing back at WP:Articles for deletion/Justin Jin (entrepreneur). The GQ article especially was a great catch and helped me with my research. S0091 (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Ah, thank you S0091, I am glad I could help! If not for TLA's poor source assessment table, I would have never voted in that AfD. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 10:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 19:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Thotakura Gopichand

Hi Jeraxmoira, Thanks for reviewing the article Thotakura Gopichand. I felt that it passes notability test as all mainstream newspapers and mediaoutlets in India have written about him and two of them had full interviews. All are reliable, secondary sources and I took about 10 reliable citations, though about 20 articles existed both in English and Telugu, all reputed newspapers. I am not sure, how you rated it. Anyway, I am writing this in good faith. thanksk and regards, Davidindia (talk) 13:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Davidindia. Yes, but all of the sources were from April 2024 and related to a single event. I mentioned the reason for draftifying on your talk page as WP:BLP1E, but you must have missed it as it would have looked like a regular move notice. Here is a recent deletion discussion about the four astronaut candidates chosen for the Indian Human Spaceflight Programme, though the consensus on this has not weight here. If you have sources from other time periods pertaining to other events, please feel free to move it mainspace after adding them. I just got my visual/source editor fixed through the Teahouse IRC, so I couldn't leave you a personal note earlier regarding this. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

No Worries. Yes missed it and I got the point. thanks a lot and will let it be in the draft space until more news appears. Thanks for the clarification. Best Regards, Davidindia (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Service Corps of Retired Executives

Moved to Draft talk:Service Corps of Retired Executives

 – Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Jeraxmoira. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Mwakwe256 (talk) 00:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for watching non notable politician. Stay safe and stay healthy! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Prabhu Patil

Hey, I just wanted to thank you for moving Prabhu Patil to draftspace. I was probably too hasty in accepting it. Have a good day! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 13:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

No worries, cheers. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Review

Hi @Jeraxmoira,

Can u review Kurangu Pedal Pagalariyaan Election (2024 film) Ingu Mirugangal Vaazhum Idam these page ? Monhiroe (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Jeraxmoira, I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Request of Review

Hi dragon @Jeraxmoira, you moved the article Draft:GreenAir to the draft space. I have heavily rewritten it. Can you review it, please? Thanks, Hegesinus (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your contributions, Jerax! i am happy to see you.

Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Question regarding Draft:Takhteshwar_Temple

Could you expand on why you draftified Draft:Takhteshwar_Temple? There appear to be multiple sources (based on a quick WP:BEFORE search) that push it over the brink of notability. Am I missing something here? Sohom (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sohom Datta, please see Wikipedia:Drafts#During_new_page_review. There's no point in having an article with tour/travel company listings that are not WP:RS. Almost none of the information was verifiable in reliable sources that were cited in the article, making it unfit for the mainspace. WP:BEFORE is only for AfDs. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I do see your point here, but I'd personally say travel guide listings are in fact RS for a place that is primarily known for it's tourism. Also, while you do point out that the policies as currently written do not explicitly ask you to perform a BEFORE search, I do think performing a BEFORE search before taking a content action that could potentially result in a article being deleted is a good idea in general. Sohom (talk) 04:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Travel/ tour company listings are not reliable for information on architecture, significance or the origins of a location/ temple's name. They can be used for uncontroversial claims, i.e. location, coordinates etc,. SEO optimized travel websites that copy content to rank high on Google are not reliable sources.

In this case, a before search was not needed as I did not nominate it for deletion. I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic. Regarding your deletion concern, the article was moved to the draftspace. Even if it hadn't been, any editor who nominates the article will have to do their own before search. If the subject is indeed notable, it will not be nominated. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I hadn't looked at the history, I had assumed you were talking about my book sources. I'd agree that the sources you removed were unreliable.

However, I'm sorry, but it is not the responsibility of NPRs to find sources while patrolling new articles, as this would take up a lot of time for what I believe is an unimportant/ low-interest topic. is an absurd claim to make. The whole point of NPR is to make judgement calls on the notability of subject which inherently require a BEFORE check. Also, you do realize that draft deletions are automatic right, if the draft sits for six months in draftspace? I can understand using draftspace to quickly move obviously underdeveloped pages off off mainspace, however, this page was > 1 month old. The way I would have dealt with the article would have been to remove the unreliable sources, done a BEFORE check and then tagged it {{more references needed}} (or AFDed it if I had determined that RS did not exist). Sohom (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

The claim you called absurd is followed day in and day out by new page reviewers. I believe that is also a reason why we have the It needs more sources to establish notability option in the MoveToDraft script. Mainspace articles can be moved to draft with a valid reason until they are more than 90 days old. We also have Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 to restore drafts that have been deleted. I will not be replying further as my explanations above address the concerns you raised. Cheers Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I find your rationale and thought process troubling to say the least. I will bring this up at WT:NPPR for further discussion. However, we can agree to disagree for this thread :( Sohom (talk) 11:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

References

Eashvar Karthic

It is clear that you created this because he directed two films. However, Zebra never released and he is not notable yet. DareshMohan (talk) 07:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

FWIW, it was not created because he directed two films. Is there any particular guideline/policy that explicitly says directors with only one film are not deemed notable? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:42, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Creative_professionals #3 The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work (for example, a film). Calling Penguin a well known work is a stretch.

If you are trying for #1 The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors;, it is doubtful if an assistant professor at American College, Madurai counts as being widely cited. If the film won a national or international award for the director, then one film can be excused. DareshMohan (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Eashvar Karthic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eashvar Karthic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eashvar Karthic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DareshMohan (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Paid editing?

Hi Jeraxmoira, I made some edits to trim puffery from Moksha Kalyanram Abhiramula and I noticed that you had marked the other article created by the same editor as possible WP:UPE. I'm not sure what evidence there is for this, but you might want to take a look at this article as well and see if should also be flagged as possible UPE? Thanks. Melcous (talk) 11:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Melcous. My concern was that there was a source that was published on the same day the article was also created, 25 June. The article also used the same image from the source. It's highly unlikely for a single-purpose account to create an article with a source published on the same day, which made me think it was UPE. Sadly, there is no actual way to prove this unless this SPA goes back to their previous editing pattern or recreates a deleted article. The sources on Moksha Kalyanram Abhiramula are all biography listings, primary sources, and press releases. I'll do a WP:BEFORE and nominate it for deletion when I get some time. Thank you for the ping Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Chidananda S Naik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chidananda S Naik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chidananda S Naik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Best to make such articles as AfC drafts. DareshMohan (talk) 07:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Ameena

Hi @Jeraxmoira, Actually i wanted to know how to find reliable sources for every change. Can you please help me with editing the same Ameena (film) Powershell17 (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Powershell17, please see reliable sources and applying reliability guidelines. I did a search myself and I am not able to find many reliable sources/ reviews post-release. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SPA at Talk:Gurbaksh Chahal. Thank you. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Doubt

Per WP:THREE and the fact that one of your journal articles mentioned this film [4], wouldn't you also consider Raghu Samarth to be notable? [5] [6] [7] DareshMohan (talk) 21:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Are you saying Raghu Samarth is not notable? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

I think he is (if interviews are notable). Sorry if I was on bad terms earlier. I initially had a different perception of WP:Director in terms of number of films. DareshMohan (talk) 06:31, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

David Weild IV

Hi. Why you reverted my edit? Indiana's Football (talk) 06:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Indiana's Football, there was no G7 tag on the deletion discussion when you removed the AfD notice from the article. You should not remove the AfD notice before the discussion is closed or deleted. There is also a bot that adds back the AfD notice if it is removed before a discussion is closed or deleted. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Understood. As i violated I violated WP:ZEALOUS, WP:DOUBT instead of improve the article I hope I will not get restricted? I am sorry Indiana's Football (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I just can’t thank you enough for your work on David Yong—I was shocked to see ya pick up on it just before it was deleted (G13), and even more shocked that it became an article! I forgot about that draft for a while and it came as a thankful surprise to see ya work on it. Thanks for all your effort you put into it, I appreciate it—a lot! :) ~ Tails Wx 00:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Tails Wx. It was all you though; I only expanded it a little. And I often go through G13 for potential drafts and I am glad David Yong caught my eye :D Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

SoundExchange COI template

Hi! Why did you remove the COI template over at SoundExchange? Sure, the talkpage is full of COI edit requests but large parts of the article were also written by COI editors (or people who just get super enthousiastic thinking about these music royalty distribution systems, which is the same thing). Polygnotus (talk) 20:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Also, wyvern or dragon what do you prefer and why. Polygnotus (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

What's the pointing of having maintenance tags when you are addressing the issues? I assumed you were already fixing it. If not, I'll look into it once you are done.

I call wyverns dragons as well and its just an inclination to mythical creatures. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Cleanup templates (hopefully) attract the kind of people this article desperately needs. I am addressing some of the many many issues, but I have a wife and a mortgage, I can't give this terrible article all of my attention while there are millions of other articles that also desperately need attention. https://i.redd.it/kn6eetctyle91.jpg Polygnotus (talk) 21:26, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jeraxmoira. Thank you for your work on Mauricio Vidal. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 22:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1M1B

Can you kindly remove the SPA tag you have inappropriately and improperly placed on my comment? The SPA tagging section clearly states that the tag should only be used on pages that relate to the single-purpose account's "single purpose". If I was a SPA, it would be on the John Lennon topic area, since most of my edits are from there. I have made no edits even remotely pertaining to the 1M1B organisation outside of the Afd discussion. Whoareuagain (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

An article you draftified is now at AfD

You may wish to visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kodagu University and decide whether you wish to leave an opinion for or against retention 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Please review this Article

Hello Mr Jeraxmoira Could you please review and accept this article Draft:Delhi Public School, Dooars Thank You Amanatadverse17 (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Amanatadverse17, the draft still does not have enough independent sources and many paragraphs are unsourced. I suggest that you focus on improving existing articles rather than creating your own until you have a better understanding of how referencing works. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:46, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Review

Mr. Jeraxmoira I would like you to review this draft Manish Kashyap Thank You. Amanatadverse17 (talk) 05:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

I have replied above. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

CSD G5s

Hello, Jeraxmoira,

I untagged a few of the pages you tagged for CSD G5 speedy deletion. Please examine each page before you tag it for deletion because not all of these articles, redirects and drafts met the G5 criteria. One article was in the middle of an article merger and I don't think speedy deletion takes priority over that. Another page had been part of a previous merge and I believe we need to retain it for attribution purposes. Also, the page creator has to be a confirmed sockpuppet, not just an editor listed on an open SPI report and has to be the sole or primary contributor to an article. Several articles you tagged had substantial contributions from several other editors so these articles weren't eligible for CSD G5. Please review WP:G5 to better understand the exact conditions that need to be in place for the G5 criteria to be valid.

But thank you for all of your contributions to the project, your patrolling is appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

A tool

Hi Jeraxmoira, I've been following the COIN discussion about Saqib and noticed your question about when a deleted draft was created. I suggest installing User:SD0001/deleted-metadata-link which is what Saqib used to provide the data. It can be quite helpful when researching socks/UPE. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi S0091, Thank you for the message. I am aware of the tool, but it didn't show up on that particular draft. That's why I wanted an admin to look at it. On a separate note, when I get the time, I'll send you an email regarding Prateek Raj's AfC. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Sometimes you have to switch to source editor for the link to show up. S0091 (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for A. Sreekar Prasad filmography

On 3 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A. Sreekar Prasad filmography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A. Sreekar Prasad filmography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A. Sreekar Prasad filmography), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:43, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sri Ganesh has been accepted

Sri Ganesh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maita Sanchez

Hello! Your submission of Maita Sanchez at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

BlueMoonset, I have replied there. Thank you for the reminder. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

JeRax

Hi @Jeraxmoira,

just curious. Are you JerAx or affiliated with him in some way? Your username just made me wonder.

Cheers, Bremps... 04:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Bremps, I was expecting someone to ask this sooner or later, haha. JerAx is a very popular player in the Dota 2 esports scene and my username was partially inspired by his in-game name. I used to play Dota 2 during my school days. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Ahh okay. Good day/night! Bremps... 05:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

For your knowledge

I edited Wikipedia previously under the username User:Otolemur crassicaudatus and User:NGC 2736. And no, I am not paid editor and I don't use any sockpuppet. CometVolcano (talk) 16:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Article request

C. Prem Kumar [8] [9] Director of 3 films, cinematographer of 6. DareshMohan (talk) 08:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Someone has already created it. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Quick draftifications

Good morning,

I noticed that today you moved a page to draft space 5 minutes after it was created. You also moved Draft:Mustafa Hills 36 minutes after it was created. Please be aware that WP:NPPHOUR is considered a best practice that NPP members are generally expected to follow. Pages are allowed to be worked on in main space and moving pages to draft space too quickly, before a user has a chance to complete it. These types of quick draftifies may be considered WP:BITEy behaviour and may push new contributors away, which is why we typically give them at least an hour since the last productive edit. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot IQR IQR (talk) 13:48, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I shouldn’t have done it, but the author’s talk page history and contributions implied that they weren’t trying to address the issues with the articles they had created earlier. I will keep the WP:NPPHOUR in mind. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

It may imply it, but the way I view it, a new user may be taking the time to try to figure something out and reading elsewhere. Reference formatting wasn't easy for me early on, so I was reading help pages figuring out the proper syntax for an hour or so. Never hurts to assume good faith and give someone a bit of extra time, it may help keep a potentially good contributor around longer ;) Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Dani Sanchez-Lopez

On 18 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dani Sanchez-Lopez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dani Sanchez-Lopez wanted to be an actor but switched to cinematography after realizing that actors deliver others' lines? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dani Sanchez-Lopez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dani Sanchez-Lopez), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Navin Chawla (judge) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Navin Chawla (judge) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Navin Chawla (judge) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— hako9 (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

TVK

Sir. This person called Yarohj is adding fake info to TVK page. Marxism is not even there in the citations he added. Please delete that. Vijay or TVK did not say TVK is left wing. It is only said by the news website. Please fix it. He is bringing his political agenda into that page. 2409:4072:6C96:68CF:6F4E:6AE4:BB93:4A69 (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi IP, I am not Jeraxmoira but if there are issues with the article, you need to start a discussion on the article's talk page. However, I will point out Wikipedia goes by what reliable secondary sources state about a subject; not what the subject says about itself. You could be right; I don't know, but be prepared to provide such sources to support your claims or prove the current cited sources do not support the content. S0091 (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@S0091 I asked to him about proof of Marxism in his page (User talk:Yarohj) that he included. He shows me a opinion of a party spokesperson known by no body. He added opinion of one of spokesperson as a primary ideology of party when the party did not tell that is the ideology. 2409:4072:6C96:68CF:854A:ACE2:C6C9:65DB (talk) 01:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Fahad Shaikh

Hello, this BLP clearly contains unreliable sources and also includes some original research. Yet, you're removing the tags. May I ask why? — Saqib (talk I contribs) 07:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I haven't reviewed the existing sources yet, but the tags were mistakenly removed in the formatting I applied. I've reverted it now. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)