Jump to content

User talk:Richardgrayson3451

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 07:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for my misbehavior and believe that perhaps there is a proper way to deal with this. I got my anger the best of me. Please forgive me and i will no longer edit Wikipedia pages without understanding the policies Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

An apology is a start, but to be unblocked you will need to demonstrate an understanding of relevant policies first- especially the fact that any interested person is welcome to contribute to an article or topic. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand those policies and have read them thoroughly. I understand that it is nessacary to accept other contributions and that to first make any change attempts in the talk page. i shall see that this shall be the procedure from next time and will remove all the messages i have put that have been against the Wikipedia editors

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A second chance to prove can help me make the better to contribute well for Wikipedia. if i fail then i will accept the block.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request the unblocking of my account. I understand that my recent edits went overboard and caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I deeply regret my actions and acknowledge that I did not fully consider the impact of my changes on the community and the integrity of the encyclopedia.

I have taken time to reflect on my actions and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I am committed to making constructive and useful contributions going forward. I assure you that I will not continue to cause any damage or disruption and will focus on editing in a way that benefits the Wikipedia community.

I kindly request you to consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to return to contributing positively and responsibly.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered.(100% certain according to GPTzero). We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


If you want to ever be able to post again, you are doing the exact wrong things. In five days, you've made *seven* unblock appeals, an absolutely absurd number, including three simultaneous ones when it's grossly improper to have more than one. And there's nothing new in any of them: you're basically saying you're sorry and you want another chance without much in the way of specifics. And, you also improperly removed a declined unblock request, meaning more time an editor had to spend because of a rule you violated.

If you actually want to return to editing Wikipedia, you need to change your approach completely. Remove your three open unblock requests and take the WP:OFFER, meaning you stay away from Wikipedia completely for six months (at a minimum). Administrators are volunteers and your unblock requests are not emergencies. You're far closer to having your talk page access removed, which makes it far less likely you'll ever be allowed to post again, than you are to being unblocked. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Admins, Hope you are doing well! Its has been a Month since my last message on my wikipedia talk page. I have tried to collaborate on other wikipedia platforms but sadly i could not since i was blocked. Hence i have taken this time to Study Wikipedia Policies and Rules. Please be rest assured that I am well versed in them. Secondly I have noticed that Truth Seeker user has been sockpocketted as me. I have logged out of wikipedia this whole month and no i have'nt been using another user id. Kindly check that users gmail and please understand. Also I will remove my bad comments on the "Lingam Page" once unblocked and will apologise to the ones i have mistreated. Finally i am hoping a word of good news that i will be given a another oppurtunity to collaborate on Wikipedia and i will sincerely strive to make things better. Thanking You! Yours Faithfully, Richard3451Grayson Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only: superseded by the appeal from 11 July. Only one request open at a time please! Ponyobons mots 22:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What other Wikipedia platforms did you try to collaborate on? You're not blocked on any of the other seven local wikis you're registered on, nor does there appear to be any collaboration. [1]. It's also going to be a challenge to get anyone to believe that isn't your sockpuppet considering that after you were blocked, they suddenly registered and continued your exact fighting at the exact page with the exact arguments, and written in the exact style. Considering the talk page of the Lingam article, where the warring has been, has only gotten 123 pageviews for the entire month of June, you're basically asking people to believe in what would be an unbelievable coincidence.

I'll give you the same advice I gave you last month, which you should have taken: it's almost certain that your best chance of ever being unblocked is to follow WP:OFFER which means no messages for a minimum of six months and no sockpuppeting. Now that you've sockpuppeted and there are additional reasons to doubt your honesty, the chances are even lower, but I still suspect that's your only path to editing again. Actually collaborating constructively on those other Wiki projects is one of the few ways you have at this point to demonstrate your good faith. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Admins & Respected CoffeeCrumbs , I would like to go out and say I have not sockpuppeted any account. I have lived in Dubai for the last 3 months and have not gone anywhere. I have learned not to deal with such doings again. There is no proof I have sockpuppeted and you may ask any information from mail to phone number to my ip address. What has happened is a WRONG COINCIDENCE i have logged out of Wikipedia and by this 18th it will be 2 months i have remained away from Wikipedia. Now in addition i am blocked on all wikipedia pages. Kindly please tell which wikipedia platform i must use to show my good faith. I am no one but and honest person who bears no vandalism thoughts or evil. What has happened was a mere mistake which i am bening backwards to fix it. Please understand that once given a second chance now or in the next 4 months i will use my efforts to remove any stain on my name for the better. I am making and effort now to change. Once again It would be helpful if you could kindly tell which wikipedia platforms "Blocked Users" must use to collaborate as i have tried Meta Wiki & Simple English Wiki but they said i was blocked across wikipedia on all platforms for my wrong doings i will even prove this by removing the talk page of mine of "Lingam" and if it pleases you write a full length apology of all i have wronged. (Redacted) Thank you, Richard3451Grayson Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 05:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From a checkuser standpoint: I don't believe that this account and the Trika Shaivism / Truth Seeker Alway socks are the same person; they are technically distinct. This was noted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richardgrayson3451 and the distinction remains even weeks after Blablubbs ran their check. I think that Richardgrayson3451 is hitting blocks on other projects due to their occasional use of proxies. I think any appeal needs to be evaluated of the original WP:NOTHERE block and not focus on the socking aspect. Richardgrayson3451, please review WP:GAB and, if you choose to do so, provide a new appeal that focuses on the reason for your original block (i.e. "insistance that Hindu related articles can only be written by Hindu scholars"). I think you should also address your use of AI images in many articles as this caused some trouble as well. Ponyobons mots 22:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[[User talk:Ponyo| Good Day to you, I would like to thank you for recognising that I did not sock puppet but however it it still on my talk page and I was worried it may affect my appeals. I wanted to write another block appeal but it was made clear that until January 11 I must not appeal. So if there is a way to evade this for one last appeal I would gladly accept it and rectify my mistakes. I realise that my comments to respected editors and admins of Wikipedia were inappropriate and I want to say that I shall no longer repeat this mistake again and always ask the editor of a page before changing the page content. Also I have used AI Images as I saw some pages using them but if this is wrong I shall not do this again. Please let me know if it is possible for another BLOCK APPEAL to evade this block. Thank You Very Much. Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the sock tag from your user page. As the socking allegations are no longer pertinent, you can make a new appeal per my ok to do so. Please focus on the aspects of the block I noted in my decline and make sure to post the new appeal to the bottom of the page. I strongly suggest you agree to not to edit any articles relating to Lingam and agree not to use AI images or text in articles as part of your appeal.-- Ponyobons mots 16:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted before, it's likely your only chance of being unblocked at any point is to take WP:OFFER. Again, that means a minimum of six months of no sockpuppets and no use of English Wikipedia. And since you've again made another unblock request not even a month after your last edit, it will be January 11 before you will be in line with WP:OFFER. I will not comment further on your talk page; I've already given you the best advice I can provide on giving you the best chance of ever being unblocked, and as you've ignored every bit of advice that anyone has given you, I just don't have anything more to help you. I wish you the best of luck in eventually being able to edit again. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Day to all Wikipedia Admins, Thanks admin user Ponyo to I have been granted a chance to appeal one last time. Now I shall make it clear that this appeal is my sincere request for change and a change of behaviour in my part. I solemnly accept that once my block is removed I shall no longer edit the page "Lingam" remove all negative comment on that page made by me, write an apology to all the admins I have abused and promise to first use the TALK PAGE of any Wikipedia article before editing the page. I shall also prohibit myself from using AI IMAGES generated by ChatGpt or Any other AI Platforms to prevent any further problems. I shall ensure that I have read the Wikipedia Guidlines throughly and will abide them once my block if lifted. Please consider this appeal and if I ever do this mistake again then I will accept this mind. I apologise to all the parties I have abused or accused wrongly and and willing to edit properly again on Wikipedia.Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per CoffeeCrumbs above, recommend waiting 6 months per WP:STANDARDOFFER before filing an appeal — 11 January 2025 with no socking. Also an answer to 331dot's questions about other accounts would be ideal. Daniel (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Nightwing/Huntress

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Richardgrayson3451. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nightwing/Huntress, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Richardgrayson3451&oldid=1254589715"