User talk:CarmenEsparzaAmoux
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
| This is CarmenEsparzaAmoux's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Covert canvassing and proxying in the Israel-Arab conflict topic area and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, BilledMammal (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is CarmenEsparzaAmoux. Thank you.
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit (blether) 16:53, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply to your email
[edit]Hi - I received your email, thank you for sending that. As I set out on my user page, I tend not to reply to emails from people whom I don't already know, and in those cases I reply on users' talk pages. When the user in question is a blocked sockpuppeteer, I am less inclined to deviate from that rule, and since you still have access to this talk page (and those of your other accounts), I think it is better that we keep any correspondence onwiki.
The email you sent me included a number of statements about your past which do not align with the publicly available facts about your activity here. For example, you said that you created this account in 2022, with the intention of sticking to the straight and narrow from that point on. That is not true. You created this account on 26 December 2021, while you were still using several different accounts on enwiki. When those accounts were blocked in March of 2022, you waited a couple of weeks, and then started to use this account to evade those blocks. You also say that you did not know that there ways to appeal blocks; I can't comment on what you knew or did not know, but every block notice you have received (I think we're up to 12 now?) has had information on how to appeal blocks.
See WP:OVERSIGHT, which might be of interest. You can email the team if necessary.
With regards to any future potential unblock request, I would advise you to check your facts carefully, ensure that you are accurate in any assertions you make, and be honest about what you have done. Best wishes Girth Summit (blether) 21:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of 2023–2024 Gaza Strip preterm births for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–2024 Gaza Strip preterm births until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.