User talk:Syedmuhammadqadiri

Welcome!

Hello, Syedmuhammadqadiri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Naushah Ganj Bakhsh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sutyarashi (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re-introducing unsourced content. It is disruptive. Sutyarashi (talk) 12:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly broaden your perspective regarding this topic and gain more information to make sure you are not introducing your own thoughts in this article. thank you. Syedmuhammadqadiri (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, really, information at Wikipedia is supposed to be verifiable through references to reliable sources. No one is "introducing their own thoughts in this article" except you. Please refrain from adding material without reliable sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sutyarashi (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Naushah Ganj Bakhsh, you may be blocked from editing. Sutyarashi (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]