User talk:Chichifat

Democracy against Communism and Islamism

Feel free to share why you believe democratic values are superior to Communist and Islamist ideologies. Chichifat (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at National Council of Canadian Muslims. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you Ottawacan (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're a legitimate profile and not a bot, please list out specifically which edits you disagree with as of 13th May and I will provide you with supporting information to dispute these. If I'm not able to, I will revert myself. Until then, I will not accept a revert of edits because they do not fall contrary to Wikipedia's community editor guidelines. Chichifat (talk) 02:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chichifat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits I made were unfairly deemed as being "vandalism" by authors with a clear bias in favour of the organization NCCM. I say this because of the wording by the other authors who described Israel as escalating attacks against "civilians" [see section on "Controversy"]. This is an unproven accusation made by the NCCM and pro-Palestine lobbyists which have never been tried at a court of law. I will concede that some edits I made had issues with references. I fixed these after this was pointed out by some users. What I object to is the "vandalism" label which I believe triggered my blocking. This I believe to be unfair because it now only allows users with a pro-NCCM/pro-Palestine biased agenda to make edits thus compromising fairness and a balanced editorial approach. My editing has focused on valid criticism of the NCCM to provide this balance.

Decline reason:

Your unblock appeal provides further evidence of why the block was correct. It demonstrates a WP:BATTLEGROUND attitude and advocacy stance that is not conducive to collaborative editing. I suggest you read the Guide to Appealing Blocks if you will be making another appeal. Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.