User talk:DenbyDoo

This is DenbyDoo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forester (schrooner) (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Forester (schrooner) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Forester (schrooner), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DenbyDoo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forester (schrooner) has been accepted

Forester (schrooner), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

McBrien Administration Building moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, McBrien Administration Building, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sounder Bruce 05:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rob Schroder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Nelson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob Schroder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Schroder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Schroder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sounder Bruce 00:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like a greater explanation for why my article has been nominated for complete and total obliteration? DenbyDoo (talk) 01:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the AFD, it would have the reason. Sea Cow (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I placed the old page I posted through the Earwig's Copyvio Detector and it found little-to-no copyright violation in the sections under "Mayor of Martinez." Any copyright being detected is in the "Early life and education/Business career/Political career 1996-2002" and those are mostly names of places he worked or committees he served on. I request an explanation for why you keep deleting my finished section titled "Mayor of Martinez," but not the sections that actually have "copyright violations." I'm really confused by this. DenbyDoo (talk) 02:37, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ay caramba! You are right, that was a massive mistake on my part. I was under the wrong assumption you wrote that part. Gawrsh darn it. I've deleted the copyright warnings from your page. Sea Cow (talk) 02:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! DenbyDoo (talk) 02:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rob Schroder, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 01:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sea Cow, if you re-add it I'll go back and add the citations, sorry about that, usually I go through and edit the page all at once and at the citations once I'm finished for the day. DenbyDoo (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's Wikipedia policy that you add citations when you add the content, not in a later edit. Just go to page history, and edit the version before my reversion in order to add the citations. Sea Cow (talk) 01:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sorry. Thank you. DenbyDoo (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing, please stop adding uncited material. CT55555 (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Rob Schroder, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Don't have a million extra unfiled subsections, go work in your sandbox instead until they are written.. Sea Cow (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There SeaCow, is that better? I'm honestly trying my hardest and appreciate the feedback and apologize for violating nay rules, I'm good intentioned, I swear. DenbyDoo (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

any not nay DenbyDoo (talk) 02:08, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, if you go to https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Rob+Schroder&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0, you copied and pasted quite a bit, which is against policy. Sea Cow (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to point out a lot of the items you claimed a I copied and pasted are literal names of places and things:

- Commercial Casualty Underwriter Training Program at the Home Insurance Company

- University of California, Berkeley

- Budget Subcommittee, Marina Subcommittee, Solid Waste Subcommittee, City/County Liaison Committee, Downtown Flood Task Force, Economic Vitality Task Force, Downtown/General Plan Update Subcommittee, Interim City Manager Subcommittee, and Internet Subcommittee.

- Transit Authority (County Connection), the Bay Area Economic Forum representing the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), and the city liaison to the Martinez Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors.

Not to mention the fact I explicitly emailed Mr. Schorder before hand who allowed me to use the information in his interviews - if that at all matters. DenbyDoo (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was this sentence. "the Budget Subcommittee, Marina Subcommittee, Solid Waste Subcommittee, City/County Liaison Committee, Downtown Flood Task Force, Economic Vitality Task Force, Downtown/General Plan Update Subcommittee, Interim City Manager Subcommittee, and Internet Subcommittee." Sea Cow (talk) 02:18, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I realize you have good faith, and you are learning the ropes, don't be scared away. You aren't trying to make Wikipedia worse, actually, it's the opposite. This is normal for anyone, the rules are quite hard to navigate, I'm going to keep a eye on your contributions so you can learn from your mistakes. :) Sea Cow (talk) 02:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. DenbyDoo (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rob Schroder

Hello, DenbyDoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rob Schroder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:McBrien Administration Building

Hello, DenbyDoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:McBrien Administration Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Kennedy Round, 1964.gif

Thank you for uploading File:The Kennedy Round, 1964.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Tokyo Round, 1973-79.gif

Thank you for uploading File:The Tokyo Round, 1973-79.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The Dillon Round, 1960-61.gif

Thank you for uploading File:The Dillon Round, 1960-61.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continued Vandalism of the "Jared Bernstein" Page

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

<Multiple right-wing users, notably Kentucky Rain24, are repeatedly changing a literal economists title from "economist" to "musician" because he has a degree in music. They've been warned MULTIPLE times and continue to engage in this disruptive behavior, and as a result these claims that Bernstein is a musician pretending to be an economist are being echoed across right-wing circles, with Don'tWalkRun recently using the Wikipedia page in his video on the topic. Multiple people across time have held degrees in topics not relating to their career field, including the father of economics himself, Adam Smith, who studied philosophy. I request this page be corrected, locked, and any users who intentionally edited this page for political reasons to be IP banned immediately> DenbyDoo (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a complaint about a particular editor, take it to a venue like WP:ANI. If there is a content dispute at the article, you can use the normal tools for resolving it. I caution you, though, that your comments constitute personal attacks and you risk being blocked for making them.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]