User talk:Blackmamba31248

Welcome!

Hello, Blackmamba31248! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PLease read

WP:NOTDUMB. Slatersteven (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

? I know you guys aren’t dumb and í know I’m not the best editor. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: How dó you cite a Books?

Hello, Blackmamba31248. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Unexpectedlydian^♯4 talk^‽ 21:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Kingdom of Nauru

I have moved your article to Draft:Kingdom of Nauru because it was clearly not ready for publication in article space. Draft space is a place that gives you time to work on improving it, without worrying about it being deleted. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It needed lots of work. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 03:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

== Welcome! ==

Hi Blackmamba31248! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab/Israel conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab/Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to your being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

High error rate

Hello again—if I could offer some more advice, could you please make a habit of checking the relevant articles before making corrections? Many of your edits have been reverted for reasons that would not crop up if you took a glance at the relevant page being linked to. Cheers. Remsense诉 02:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What dó you mean by “relevant articles?” Also, which edits? Chould you be mire specific. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You changed "Osama bin Laden" to "Osama Bin Laden" in War in Afghanistan (2001–2021) because you thought you were fixing a capitalization error—one glance at Osama bin Laden would have rectified this.
You changed "Umayyad Emirate" to "Umayyad Caliphate" in Siege of Tortosa (808–809), thinking it was some inaccurate neologism—one glance at Umayyad Emirate would have clarified that it was a distinct polity.

Remsense诉 02:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Í see. But also, the reason í corrected Emirate to Calipahte is because í thought it was refering to the Umyadd Caliphate not the Emirate of Cordoba. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Umayyad Caliphate as such ceased to exist c. 750. My point still fully applies: please double-check that your corrections are actually corrections. Remsense诉 02:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, í should check for factuallatyy more often. Thank You. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aldamira Guedes Fernandes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quixeramobim. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read it now Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article not available

@friend,In your userpage There is a link referring to an article which claimed to be created by you but after clicking this shows that no such article exists or might be deleted.I hope you could do something to reorganize your userpage.regardsKEmel49 (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a draft, but yeah i need to fix it. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 15:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DOne Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--KEmel49 (talk) 09:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome! Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern is highly suspicious and you are clearly an incompetent editor. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 05:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also the fact that you say you've previously had accounts here is highly concerning. Were they blocked for any reason? Or do you mean IP addresses? On your user page you say you've had an "IP account"; that's a contradiction in terms. Graham87 (talk) 05:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I found you because an edit you made added extreme overlinking with a link to the "Australia" article. The fact that you even thought to do that without checking the simplified Manual of Style linked above (that clearly advises against it) does not portray you in a good light either. Graham87 (talk) 07:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just lost my password tó the other accounts. With the IP account, í was blocked several times due tó abuse of Admin powers. There where periods where í didn’t even edit and still blocked. It was very Consistent. Check my editing history. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 12:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, all my edits where in good faith.

My accounts:

User:Leninistpython

I can not seem to find my other accounts, but they where called Snipercobra and Socalistviper, tó be exact.

You will see that í haven’t made edits on the accounts in months, so í am not a sockpuppet.

Again, í am relativley new to Wikipedia, and try not to Make any mistakes. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 12:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have also read the manaul of style. I was not aware it was there. Chould you please be more specific on how my edit pattern is “suspicous?” Blackmamba31248 (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blackmamba31248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will admit that it was foolish of me to not read the manual of style, but i have read it now. I will take full accountability for disruptive editing on my behalf, however, not all of my editing was “disruptive” as lots of it was correcting grammar mistakes and fixing links. Supossed sockpuppetry, the other reason i was blocked, is not true. I will link all my accounts: User:Leninistpython Special:Contributions/136.33.235.64 my other accounts did not have userpages, but they where called Snipercobra, cobra and Socalistviper, respectively. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm unsure why you are unable to write "to" and "I" correctly, or why you are unable to write an unblock request without making significant spelling mistakes. Perhaps you aren't being deliberately disruptive, perhaps WP:CIR applies. Either way, best you remain blocked. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Those where acccent marks, and the spelling mistakes are mostly do to the Auto correct that is endabled, as i use an Icelandic keyboard. Either way, i should of went and corrected it. (UTC)}}

Additional unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blackmamba31248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My recent unblock request was declined, but a good reason was not given, (Scroll up to see the reason.) I do believe that the blocking admin and the declining admin where acting in good faith, however, the blocking admin’s reasoning did not seem just to me, as although i was foolish in some things, such as not reading the manual of style, and i take full accountability for that, but most of my editing was in fact, (in my opinon) not disruptive, examples of my reverted editing include:

Adding quotation marks on a quote
Correcting a link
Expanding articles

I will link those specific articles: Al-Quaeda War of the Sicilian Vespers Marfa Sharoiko I was also blocked for supposed sockpuppetry, but i will link my accounts that haven’t been active in months: User:Leninistpython My other accounts, Socalistviper, Snipercobra, and cobra did not have userpages. My IP account was also blocked, and i will admit i was blocked many times, due to abuse of admin powers. I was blocked almost every day and unblocked the next day, despite no unblock requests being fufilled. Check the contributions, and you will see no vandalistic edits: Special:Contributions/136.33.235.64 To conclude it all, some edits where incredibly foolish of me and some where not, and if an admin decides to unblock me, i wil promise to not make any further mistakes that harm Wikipedia.

Blackmamba31248 (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Based on this appeal and the discussion below, I have unblocked this account. Any further evidence of editing from multiple accounts will cause reinstatement of the block. 06:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

The appeal above is the first coherent and well-written thing you've written. Thank you for demonstrating that you have read the guide to appealing blocks.

I must say, this talk page shows ample evidence of careless writing and contributions that force others to clean up after you, leading others to suspect a lack of WP:COMPETENCE that deserved block. The fact that you have had multiple accounts in violation of the terms of use to which you agreed when you created them is also sufficient reason for blocking. Thank you for disclosing them, although you haven't explained why you created them in the first place. Are you saying those accounts have been abandoned forever? Do you plan continue with this account without creating yet another account? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the reason i created them follows:

My first account: First time i edited Wikipedia, lost the password a couple of days later.

Second and third: Wanted to be able to edit a semi-protected page.

Current: I decided i wanted to have a permanent account rather than being an IP user. Some are saved in my password log, but i had belived i had lost the password. Also, the “cobra” one i had not made any edits on and i created before i started editing, and abandoned it a few days later.

When i was on my IP account, i will admit i was blocked almost every day, but then i was unblocked the next day. It was constant, and no talk page message was left. I have never vandalised Wikipedia, the reason i was blocked for some reason. If you checked my IP account edit history, you won’t see anything. Also, it was my School IP, which might have been the reason. For the lack of Competence, after the “High error rate” message, i now always fact-check. I’ve read Competence required and everything related. I do apoligize for the foolish edits. (Also, if my unblock request is accepted, i will continue editing this account) Blackmamba31248 (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you realize that if you confirm an email address in your account profile, you can still access your account to reset your password if you lose your password? If you haven't yet added your email address, then do so now. It's under Preferences, User profile tab, email options section.

@Graham87: Based on these responses I am willing to unblock if you have no objections. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, í’ve added my email to my account now, just not confirmed it, because problem is, í created this account on my School device, and foreign emails can not be sent. I am logged in on my home device, but í obvisouisly have a different email on that, so really nothing i can do. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: Yeah do what you like ... I'm not really in a position to do much because I'm trying to get used to this new computer. Graham87 (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm your account with what you would consider your permanent email address. The device you use shouldn't matter, particularly if you can get email through your browser, which most mail services offer. You should be able to access your account from any device, but if you lose your password, you would need to reset it from a location or device where you have access to the email address you confirmed. I'm reluctant to unblock until you get this sorted out, because administrators don't want to deal with yet more accounts from you just because you didn't manage your account access properly. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll get that done. Thank you. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So are you saying í can change my Email? When i created my account, i used my school email. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I got a little confused when i read that. I have changed to my home Email now, and confirmed it.

Blackmamba31248 (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have unblocked your account. Now that you can recover access if you lose the password, be sure that this is the only account you use from now on, or one of the admins will block you again again. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your WP:AN report

Yes, it is nothing. In general, if an editor makes a silly "drive-by" comment like that, either just ignore it, or if you're absolutely sure you're following WP:TPO, remove it. (If you're not sure, leave it up to the next person who discovers it). There's no need to report it anywhere. I don't know if they were trolling, but I doubt it. In fact, I doubt the person behind that IP is ever going to view the talk page again. Think of it as a YouTube comment. I'm oversimplifying a bit, but unless it's hate speech or repeated personal attacks, it doesn't need to be reported. And even then, maybe not. Remember trolls thrive on conflict; having their comment just quietly deleted an hour later is boring.

One more thing: "only edit" doesn't mean much when it comes to IPs; most IP addresses are dynamic these days and they may have been only assigned that IP recently. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i will consider this the next time a see a troll. The reason i was concerned was unlike Youtube or any other Social Media, Wikipedia is a formal setting, but, you’re right. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 02:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also regarding Special:Diff/1223587482, you really, really, really don't want to be posting at WP:ANI unless you know what goes on there. It's a hostile, high-drama place, so only go there as an absolute last resort. Seriously, be careful. Technical matters can go to WP:VPT, which is friendlier. However, I think I can answer: File:Example.jpg is WP:CASCADE-protected through Wikipedia:Cascade-protected_ items/content but not protected directly, and for some reason, the "view source" link only shows up when the page is protected directly. I don't know why, but it probably has something to do with efficiency. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for iforming me of this. I will only Post on there when i see persistent vandalism or something serious like that. Blackmamba31248 (talk) 11:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Gambians

Hello, Blackmamba31248. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Gambians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:List of Gambians

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:List of Gambians, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdom of Nauru

Hello, Blackmamba31248. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kingdom of Nauru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:27, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]