Talk:The Secret Life of Pets 2

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Character

What could be harrison ford take a voice of any character?? Aldiagung (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A message to everyone who thinks this movie will underperform at the box office

I’ve heard several people on the Internet say that this movie will underperform at the box office compared to the first movie (which made $104 million opening weekend and $368 million total. Frankly, I don’t think those people know what they’re talking about. Sure, this movie has some competition for family audiences this summer (Toy Story 4, The Lion King, Aladdin, etc), but I don’t think any of those movies will greatly affect this one. This is Illumination we’re talking about here! They always make a lot of money off their movies. MY PREDICTION: Opening Weekend: $125 million (most animated sequels make more money than the first movie) Total: $400 million

Talk pages are meant to discuss possible improvements to the article, they are not a comment section. If you want to share your opinion of box office predictions for this film, social media or personal blogs are better suited for that, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. -Gouleg (Talk • Contribs) 17:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the final poster?

Hello, is there any reason why I didn't see the final poster of this movie today? I am so worried.

The Secret Life of Pets 2 (upcoming film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Secret Life of Pets 2 (upcoming film). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 13:26, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret Life of Pets 3

Have you guys heard about a possible third Secret Life of Pets movie? look up on cinemablend and see. -Dinonick90 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL and try to avoid speculation. Actors are unlikely to say bad things before a film has been released. Actors are often tied into multi-film contracts and are still unlikely to say bad things even after a film bombs. This should probably not have been added to the article. This film looked like it did well so a sequel or spin-off does seem likely but until they announce that they have gone into production I don't think it is appropriate to add anything. Again please try to avoid speculation, this is still supposed to be an encyclopedia. -- 109.78.244.23 (talk) 04:22, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sequel

I've removed the "Sequel" section, and I probably shouldn't have even tried to rewrite the misguided speculation in the first place. It was only comments from actors right in the middle of promoting the film saying they'd prefer not to be unemployed. There is no film in development.

Any section labelled "Possible sequel" should really be removed on sight, because WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL WP:NOTFUTURE WP:NOTRUMOR WP:NOTSPECULATION. -- 109.79.86.113 (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remove again.[1] This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, of course actors are going to say they would like to work on the film again when they are right in the middle of promoting it. If the writers or the director or the producers had something to say about a sequel that might be worth including but these comments from the actors are not meaningful or significant. -- 109.76.195.183 (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But it could be! But gonna shows you while I edited it.~~ MLJ 657 (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, and an encyclopedia is supposed to be about what is not what "could be". Please try to read some of the guidelines WP:NOTSPECULATION, with a better understanding of the rules and guidelines it might become clearer to you. -- 109.78.194.120 (talk) 16:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hu had no spoken lines

Hu the tiger don't speak anything, just only roars and growls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.222.83.87 (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what do you mean by this; but looking at your contributions, Talk pages are places meant to discuss article improvement, they're not a forum to discuss the subject. -Gouleg🛋️ (Talk • Contribs) 17:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality of production

Only production company listed is American. Japan and France were added with a national database source but that conflicts with their being no Japanese or French production companies involved with the production. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The issue appears to be that the Lumiere site attributes "producing countries" to all those who provided financing.

Adopting a pragmatic approach, the Observatory considers as the country of origin of a specific film the country out of which the film is financed. In the case of international co-productions, the film is assigned to the country which provides the majority share of production financing. The Observatory tries to list all co-producing countries in the order of their financial investment in the film (whether known or assumed), with the country having provided the majority financial investment in the production in first place. [2] Barry Wom (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So basically a country is listed in the database record if some entity in that country helped finance the film. It has nothing to do with which company actually produced, as in created, the film. We should stick with nationality of the credited production company or companies, companies that are in the actual business of making films. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]