User talk:Nederlandse Leeuw
Index
|
|||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
Category:Rus' principalities has been nominated for merging
[edit]
Category:Rus' principalities has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Kievan rus
[edit]Hello, I saw you haven't answered me for a long time in discussion, so I want to directly discuss the changes in the article. I'm not antinormanist by the way, so no need to assault me, I have already provided reliable sources so it shouldn't take a long time. 46.200.75.110 (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Should I maybe rephrase my statement, @Nederlandse Leeuw? 46.200.75.110 (talk) 16:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- No thanks, I'm not interested. Have a nice day. NLeeuw (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Always precious
[edit]
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Third Swedish Crusade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish Crusades.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Proposal to change the name of an article to a more accurate one
[edit]I recently noticed the revision history of List of Wars involving Peru https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_wars_involving_Peru&action=history and the fact that were eliminated Wars on pre-colonial Peru. Then the creation of the article List of wars involving the Inca Empire. Although I praise the initiative of that for a better understandment for Pre-Hispanic cultures that can't be considered "Peru" propperly (as there were a lot of indigenous nations that were different between them until Spaniards unificate them and was founded properly the contemporary Peruvian nation), I don't agree about naming that article as only "wars involving the Inca Empire", as the Inca Civilization was one of a lot of societies that were in Ancient Peru territory, there were a lot of Andean Civilisations and Amazonic Societies that can't be classified as Incas.
So, I have two propositions, or naming the article "List of wars on Ancient Peru/involving Pre-Hispanic Peruvians" (in the first, emphasizing that it's an article invaling pre-hispanic states with their headquarters in Peru and being based mostly in the territorial than ethnic realities, or in the second having a more generic title that it's more aproppiate for social realities) or mantaining the article, but moving the Non-Inca Wars after creating a new article named "List of wars on Ancient Peru in Pre-Inca Times". Sr L (talk) 04:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Need help
[edit]Hi! I want to ask you to help with my new draft. Can you please correct grammatical mistakes and rephrase the text at certain points, as well as add English-language literature on this subject. I will be very grateful! Dushnilkin (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I will take a look at it. NLeeuw (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Dushnilkin (talk) 15:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again, I have sent the draft for review, thank you so much for your help! Dushnilkin (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- You're welcome! In the meantime, I've done some improvements to main article Russo-Kazan Wars. I was surprised to find out just how important the role of dynastic politics was, more than I already thought. It seems that the Crimean Khanate treated the Khanate of Kazan as a sort of appanage, a fiefdom for junior princes of the Giray dynasty, and that Muscovy was happy to be the bridge between the two. NLeeuw (talk) 09:45, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]
Hi Nederlandse Leeuw, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much! I greatly appreciate the trust the community has put in my contributions over the years. I shall strive to maintain this high level of quality, and never stop learning in order to expand and refine my skills. NLeeuw (talk) 11:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)