Talk:The Wheel of Time (TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wheel of Time (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.gq.com/story/inside-amazons-wheel-of-time

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Too long or excessively detailed plot summaries

Just curious why some second season episodes were tagged as such. They are pretty long and detailed, but the nature of the show with so many perspectives, and trying to condense 2 books into 8 episodes means there is a lot of relevant details =D

If someone has ideas on how to condense this, I'd be curious about the approach.

Only thought I had was maybe splitting it up into the summary of each perspective or something... I think it would make it even longer, but might feel more concise on each plot progression? AlasdairHutchinson (talk) 14:24, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:TVPLOT, "plot summaries of no more than 200 words per episode should ideally be presented in a table". I've seen 2.5hr-long TV episodes (such as in Sense8 and Stranger Things) abide by the limit of 200 words; this series certainly can as well. -- Alex_21_TALK 20:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is dishonest to not include or allow any comments that the TV show is not true to the source material

I have seen plenty of entries on Wikipedia that mention that certain other book adapations have not been faithful to their respective source material. This can and is an objective fact and is not a matter of opinion, yet whenever this page is edited to state as such, the edit is removed. These pages are supposed to be reflective of facts are they not? Surely it is acceptable to state that the series has not been received well by many who have read the books due to heavy deviations in the TV show. 2A02:C7E:28C5:7400:A115:1780:4431:4386 (talk) 22:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commentary about this is fine if it has been noted by reliable sources. So an editor can't just decide "this isn't like the source material" and write that here. If a reliable source, like a review in a reliable publication/website, makes this point then it can be included, if notable. But EVERY adaptation is going to differ from the source material, so not every discrepancy is notable. In the case of The Wheel of Time, it doesn't seem like there are gigantic differences that notably change the narrative or concept. But if you can refer me to such coverage that you think might be relevant to this article, I can check it out and we can discuss it here. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 22:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fact" is not a thing on Wikipedia. Nor is "opinion". Reliable secondary sourcing, however, is, per WP:RS and WP:V. If you have the reliable sources to back up what you're saying, other than "I know it's true", then please, by all means. -- Alex_21_TALK 08:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]