This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Per my edit summary a bit over a week ago, reiterating now for further reference since it doesn't seem likely to be addressed any time soon, the cited sources are unclear on whether Ikkjutt Jammu is a political party or a social group. Cited sources state things like After months of speculations in public domain, social organisation ‘Ikkjutt Jammu’ today took the political plunge with announcement of creation of political party with the same name ([1]), leaving unclear whether we should cover IJ as one organization with an electoral/political wing, or as two different organizations with a shared name. signed, Rosguilltalk14:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ikkjutt Jammu is the former name of Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal which is a political party:
I am trying to remove disputes of the article when many editors do remove my edits. Like, I did remove an unusable account then Mr. Shovel ask me " Why it is unusable ?" And restores it. Leter some he also removes it.give Attention on these. हिन्दू१ (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I don't understand what you mean by "removing disputes". In this edit, you removed the whole Platform section of the article for the second time, with the edit summary "Removed, the waste part of article". Please explain what you mean by that.
And in this edit, you removed the whole History section for the second time, with the edit summary "Removed, unimportant part with wrong information and sources like youtube or twitter." I don't see a YouTube reference, and there's just one Twitter reference, along with several reliable sources. Please explain then why you removed the section, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ikkjutt Jammu was not only a political party, an social organization with the same name 'Ikkjutt Jammu' is also active in this area Jammu. Jammu is a city in Jammu area, but Jammu area/ Jammu division these are two places. Same being in this case, Two organisation (Ikkjutt Jammu and IkkJutt Jammu) are/were active in Jammu. This article about political party not to Social organisation. Waste part telling the story about social organisation. Now, party did Marge in BJP. SOME sources of political party and some social organisation and many disputes are available. Platform sanction saying about Social organisation and history section saying about political party. Social organisation founded in 2018 but party founded in 2020. Article telling social organisation turned political party, this is wrong. And Ikkjutt Jammu is Ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal also wrong history. Some sources sayin it mistakewise. And much more thankyou 2409:40D2:2010:CD74:AC04:91FF:FE19:2145 (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please log back in, thanks. There is a single sentence about the social organisation at the start of the "Platform" section that was removed, so if the social organisation was completely separate from the party, then I would agree that that first sentence should be removed. Can you provide WP:Reliable sources for that? The rest of the section is about the party, not the social organisation.