Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Assessment
Article assessment involves determining the quality and importance of articles of interest to WikiProject Conservatism. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.The article review processes provide constructive criticism which is used by editors to improve articles. We're happy to assess your new article as well as developed articles.
Statistics
[edit]| Quality assessment: 99.7% complete | ||
| Importance assessment: 87.1% complete | ||
| Conservatism articles by quality and importance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Importance | ||||||
| Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
 FA
|
3 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 49 | ||
| FM
|
21 | 21 | |||||
 A
|
1 | 1 | |||||
 GA
|
3 | 10 | 27 | 78 | 1 | 119 | |
| B | 23 | 84 | 231 | 497 | 99 | 934 | |
| C | 36 | 131 | 344 | 1,231 | 1 | 238 | 1,981 |
| Start | 15 | 95 | 450 | 2,281 | 632 | 3,473 | |
| Stub | 12 | 85 | 840 | 310 | 1,247 | ||
| List | 2 | 7 | 28 | 101 | 4 | 142 | |
| Category | 1 | 1,005 | 1,006 | ||||
| Disambig | 23 | 23 | |||||
| File | 200 | 200 | |||||
| Portal | 137 | 137 | |||||
| Project | 43 | 43 | |||||
| Redirect | 2 | 4 | 13 | 74 | 306 | 399 | |
| Template | 226 | 226 | |||||
| NA | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| Other | 28 | 28 | |||||
| Assessed | 84 | 354 | 1,193 | 5,125 | 1,994 | 1,284 | 10,034 |
| Unassessed | 3 | 10 | 22 | 35 | |||
| Total | 84 | 354 | 1,196 | 5,135 | 1,994 | 1,306 | 10,069 |
| WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 35,812 | Ω = 4.59 | |||||
Index · Statistics · Log
Request assessment
[edit]To request an assessment of your new or developed article click here:
If you would like an outside opinion on a new quality and/or importance rating for your article, please feel free click the button. This will result in an assessment rating of Stub, Start, C or B.
Overview
[edit]The assessment system used by the WikiProject Conservatism to rate article quality consists of two parallel quality scales; one scale is used to assess regular prose articles, while the other is used to assess lists and similar non-prose articles.
| Prose article | List article | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stub | The first stage of an article's evolution is called a stub. A stub is an extremely short article that provides a basic description of the topic at best; it includes very little meaningful content, and may be little more than a dictionary definition. At this stage, it is often impossible to determine whether the topic should be covered by a prose article or a list, so this assessment level is shared between the two scales. | |||||||
 |
 |
|||||||
| Start | List | A stub that undergoes some development will progress to the next stage of article evolution. An article at this stage provides some meaningful content, but is typically incomplete and lacks adequate references, structure, and supporting materials. At this stage, it becomes possible to distinguish between prose articles and lists; depending on its form, an article at this level will be assessed as a Start-Class prose article or a List-Class list.
| ||||||
 |
| |||||||
| C | As the article continues to develop, it will reach the C-Class level. At this stage, the article is reasonably structured and contains substantial content and supporting materials, but may still be incomplete or poorly referenced, but not both. As articles progress to this stage, the assessment process begins to take on a more structured form, and specific criteria are introduced against which articles are rated. The article meets at least one of the B-Class criteria.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| B | An article that reaches the B-Class level is complete in content and structure, adequately referenced, and includes reasonable supporting materials; overall, it provides a satisfactory encyclopedic presentation of the topic for the average reader, although it might not be written to the standard that would be expected by an expert. Articles at this stage commonly undergo peer review to solicit ideas for further improvement. B-Class is the final assessment level that can be reached without undergoing a formal review process, and is a reasonable goal for newer editors.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| GA
|
After reaching the B-Class level, an article may be submitted for assessment as a good article. Good articles must meet a set of criteria similar to those required for the B-Class assessment level, and must additionally undergo the formal good article review process.
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| A
|
AL
|
A good or B-Class article that has undergone additional improvement may be considered for the A-Class assessment level. An A-Class article presents a complete and thorough encyclopedic treatment of a subject, such as might be written by an expert in the field; the only deficiencies permissible at this level are minor issues of style or language. To receive an A-Class rating, a candidate article must undergo the formal A-Class review process. The A-Class rating is the highest assessment level that may be assigned by an individual WikiProject; higher assessment levels are granted only by Wikipedia-wide independent assessment processes.
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
| FA
|
FL
|
The featured article and featured list ratings represent the pinnacle of article evolution and the best that Wikipedia has to offer; an article at this level is professional, outstanding, and represents a definitive source for encyclopedic information. Featured status is assigned only through a thorough independent review process; this process can be grueling for the unprepared, and editors are highly advised to submit articles for A-Class review prior to nominating them for featured status.
| ||||||
- Importance scale
| Importance | Criteria | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to the Conservatism topic area. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within Conservatism. Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. Subject is a candidate for {{Conservatism}}. | |
| High | Subject is extremely notable within the Conservatism topic area, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. Subject is a candidate for a country-specific sidebar e.g. {{Conservatism US}}. | |
| Mid | Subject is only notable within the Conservatism topic area and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | |
| Low | Subject is of the lowest level of relevance or significance to Conservatism topic area. | |
| NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:Conservatism |
| ??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | See: Category:Unknown-importance Conservatism articles |
How to assess an article
[edit]- Assess the article using the quality and importance schemes above.
- Once assessed add
{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=|importance=}}to the Talk page with the correct parameters. - Edit the Talk page to add a comment about why you rated the article the way you did. Please sign and date your comment with ~~~~.
- The Rater tool can assist with article assessment. Another tool is the Kingbotk plugin for AutoWikiBrowser.
See below for assessing specific quality types
- Stub
Stubs are assessed using Individual Review, and the author is free to assess the article. If the article is assessed better than a stub but it has a stub template, remove the stub template(s) from the article. Currently there are no conservatism stub templates, identification of stubs is accomplished by setting class=stub in the banner. This categorizes article talk pages into Category:Stub-Class Conservatism articles. Politics stub templates can also be useful. The stub for a politician is {{Poli-bio-stub}} and a political organization is {{poli-org-stub}}. See WP:WikiProject Conservatism/Templates for more stubs.
- C-Class
C-Class articles are assessed using Individual Review, and the author is free to assess the article.
- B-Class
B-Class articles are assessed using Individual Review, rating is typically left to an independent editor; requests for an independent assessment may be made here.
- GA-Class
The good article nomination process is an independent review mechanism through which an article receives a "good article" quality rating. The process involves a detailed review of the article by an independent examiner, who determines whether the article meets the good article criteria. Full instructions for requesting a good article review are provided on the good article review page.
- A-Class
The WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review process is the most thorough and demanding assessment of article quality done by the WikiProject Conservatism. An article that undergoes this process must be reviewed by at least two independent examiners, each of whom must agree that the article meets all of the A-Class criteria. Full instructions for requesting an A-Class review are provided on the A-Class review page.
- FA-Class
The featured article candidacy and featured list candidacy processes are an independent, Wikipedia-wide quality assessment mechanism; these processes are the only way an article can receive a "featured" quality rating. The process involves a comprehensive review of the article by multiple independent examiners, all of whom must agree that the article meets the featured article or list criteria. Full instructions for submitting a featured article or list candidacy are provided on the corresponding candidacy page. Editors are advised to carefully review the submission instructions; failing to follow them correctly may cause the submission to be rejected.
Article tagging FAQ
[edit]- Q: An article was erroneously tagged by a member of this project.
- A: Do not remove the banner. Ask the member why they tagged it, or post a message at the project talk page (below). Note: the banner does not imply that the subject has a conservative or right-wing ideology, has no relevance to neutral POV, nor that WikiProject Conservatism owns the article.[1]
- Q: I'm a member and the banner I added to an article talk page was removed.
- A: From PROGGUIDE: You may not force them to remove the banner. No editor may prohibit a group of editors from showing their interest in an article. This warning {{WPRYT Uw-banner}} can be used to notify an editor of the guideline.
- Q: Can non-members tag articles?
- A: Yes, but if a member removes the banner do not replace it.[1]
- Q: The quality or importance rating of an article is incorrect.
- A: Anyone can change the rating. Make sure to consult the assessment scale here. Ratings are subjective, importance ratings in particular can be controversial. Disputes will be resolved by project members at the project talk page (below).[2][3]
- Q: What is the scope of this WikiProject?
- A: As stated on the main page of this project, we are dedicated to improving articles related to conservatism, not limited to any particular form or national variety of conservatism.
Assessment log
[edit]
November 21, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Nippon Ishin no Kai renamed to Japan Innovation Party.
Reassessed
[edit]- American Life League (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Cathy Giessel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- J. William Middendorf (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Jamie Allard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Japan Innovation Party (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- The Trump Economic Miracle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Tyler Oliveira (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
November 20, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Bo Snerdley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Conservative Party (United States) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Conservative Party of Washington (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Erika Harold (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Shannon Grove (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- The Road to Serfdom (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- National Democratic Party (United States) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- San Fransicko (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]November 19, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Draft:List of contributors to Project 2025 renamed to User:Trackerwannabe/Draft:List of contributors to Project 2025.
Reassessed
[edit]- Conservative Party (South Carolina) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Lisa McClain (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Allan H. Meltzer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- American Foreign Policy Council (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Chris Simcox (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Conservative Party of Delaware (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Daniel Halper (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- David Hackett Fischer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Donald T. Critchlow (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- First Liberty Institute (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Hans-Georg Gadamer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Holman W. Jenkins Jr. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ilan Berman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Irving Kristol Award (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Jim Gilchrist (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kimberley Strassel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mary O'Grady (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Minuteman Civil Defense Corps (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Nicholas Eberstadt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Otis L. Graham (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Paul Cameron (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert R. Reilly (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Vets For Freedom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
November 18, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party renamed to List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party.
Assessed
[edit]- Karoline Leavitt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- List of national presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Michael Yon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Shelley Luther (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- The Spotlight (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
November 17, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Blexit (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
- George Radanovich (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Protectionism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Hiring and personnel concerns about Donald Trump (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- History of tariffs in the United States (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
November 16, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- UMNO renamed to United Malays National Organisation.
Reassessed
[edit]- Allan C. Carlson (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- American Liberty League (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Bharatiya Janata Party (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Libertarian conservatism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Mike Gabbard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Sharon Statement (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Tomin First no Kai (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- David Aldrich Nelson (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Eugen Diederichs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Foundation for Economic Education (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Frederick Schauer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Grant Abraham (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- James V. Schall (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Juliana Geran Pilon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Peter Lawler (academic) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:René Guénon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert L. Paquette (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ronald M. Nate (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Taylor Budowich (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- United Malays National Organisation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Narendra Modi (talk) removed.
- Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (talk) removed.
November 15, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of post–2016 election Donald Trump rallies renamed to List of Donald Trump rallies (December 2016–2022).
- Draft:Patrick Bet-David renamed to Patrick Bet-David.
- Timeline of the John A. Macdonald premiership renamed to Timeline of the John A. Macdonald premierships.
Reassessed
[edit]- Andy Ngo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Anthony Sabatini (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Stay-at-home daughter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Bill McGinley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- List of Donald Trump rallies (December 2016–2022) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- The Tucker Carlson Show (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Timeline of the John A. Macdonald premierships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Former recognized content
[edit]Former Featued articles and lists are good candidates for A-Class review.
 | This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly by JL-Bot (talk · contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it is tagged (e.g. {{WikiProject Conservatism}}) or categorized correctly and wait for the next update. See WP:RECOG for configuration options. |
- Former featured articles
Anarcho-capitalism • Paul Bremer • Bricker Amendment • Tom Brinkman • Constitution of the United States • Gerald Ford • Frankfurt School • Bruce Johnson (Ohio politician) • Liberal Movement (Australia) • Libertarianism • John Major • Bob McEwen • Original sin • Political correctness • Read my lips: no new taxes • Nancy Reagan • Theodore Roosevelt • Nicolas Sarkozy • Jean Schmidt • Margaret Thatcher • Daniel Webster • Zionism
- Former featured lists
List of chief ministers from the Bharatiya Janata Party
- Former featured pictures
-
Commercial-LBJ1964ElectionAdDaisyGirl
- Former good articles
Edmund Burke • George H. W. Bush • George W. Bush • David Cameron • Capitalism • Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh • Mike Cierpiot • Cold War • College Republicans • Death panel • Falun Gong • Foundation for Economic Education • Alan Keyes • Liaquat Ali Khan • Marcel Lefebvre • Rush Limbaugh • McCarthyism • Michigan Republican Party • Patrick Henry College • Ron Paul • Rape and pregnancy statement controversies in the 2012 United States elections • Condoleezza Rice • Ellen Roberts • Larry Sanger • Michael Savage • Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump • Unitary executive theory • United Malays National Organisation • The Wall Street Journal • Geert Wilders • Wildrose Party