Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2023/11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023

01 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 18:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, the player is in the trade market, but still a member of chicago bears, people are editing to change to teams he is not part of. Mdsmith98 (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also the article is being vandalized by multiple IP's. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 19:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: User request, no need for non-autoconfirmed editors to edit my user page. Awesome Aasim 18:50, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User pages are automatically non-auto confirmed protected and ECP is not necessary in your case. RegentsPark (comment) 19:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I meant to say "no need for non-EC users to edit" but yeah.
I forget which abuse filter blocks edits of user pages by anonymous users? Awesome Aasim 19:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Awesome Aasim, that's filter 806. Your user page's filter 806 log seems to be quite clean, but there may be oversighted attempts we both wouldn't be able to see. If I see correctly, the last disruptive edit that would have been prevented by extended-confirmed protection was made in 2020; that's probably not sufficient to say that semi-protection "has proven to be ineffective" in the way required by the protection policy.
That all said, if other pages in your userspace – not protected by the filter – regularly receive disruption, please let me know and I'll semi-protect them. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh thanks! Have a good day! Awesome Aasim 20:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You too :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Target of disruptive requests and vandalism. Previously semi-protected due to disruption. I note that Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war has been indefinitely ECP'd recently due to similar problems. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I know that this page has been deleted before and that I have tried to create it on a couple different occasions. i am someone who is very interested in American football. I have seen this athlete perform on a number of occasions. Recently, He broke Georgetown University's Single Game Passing Record and tied the record for completions in a single game. He did this in his first collegiate game. I know that when I first tried to publish this article about him, he lacked significant coverage, now I feel that this acceptable for publication. I will include some of the article that have been written about him thus far. https://guhoyas.com/news/2023/10/28/football-hoyas-fall-to-no-19-21-lafayette-on-senior-day.aspx

https://guhoyas.com/news/2023/10/30/football-lauter-earns-patriot-league-weekly-honorable-mention.aspx Walter Klaus (talk) 21:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This page has quite a deletion record, as recently as August. Two articles from his athletic program will not change this. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Those are just articles that I found quickly, There is one from his league ... ect. It is not like he is some nobody. There are articles about him competing for the US National Team and Videos with close to 4 million views on ESPN NFL, NFL Brasil, The Check Down ECT. Walter Klaus (talk) 21:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of this was in the most recent deleted draft, but for the two links you just added, which are not independent of the subject. Vanamonde93 protected the article and Bishonen protected the draftspace. Creating Draft:Danny lauter to get around that was not the best idea. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I thought that it got unrestricted. I didn't realize that the L, and the l make a difference in the title. That was my bad. I was going to delete that page and go through the proper channels. That is why I am going this route. Walter Klaus (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Edit war. •Cyberwolf• 17:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive POVPUSH by new accounts, heated up recently; a temp PP should be good. Gotitbro (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of copyrighted images by several newly created accounts. Two of these accounts have COI (see my talk page), not sure about the new ones. Vacant0 (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vacant0, removing copyright violations is fine. Edit warring a disputed (and arguably indeed unnecessarily unfavorable-looking) image back into a biography is not. In such cases, please restrict yourself to the pure removal of the problem and seek a consensus for your preferred addition. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping vandal. Tollens (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism continued after protection expired. Eyesnore talk💬 23:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after expiration of protection. Eyesnore talk💬 23:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again two days after protection expired. Eyesnore talk💬 02:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again just after protection expired. Eyesnore talk💬 02:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 19:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/PAGEANT. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the last protection expired lots of IP vandalism. KylieTastic (talk) 23:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf• 01:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also WP:BLP policy issues. Six previous protections according to log. Since last protection expired, almost no edits from anonymous users have been constructive. Eyesnore talk💬 01:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs with dumb meme edits. Nswix (talk) 01:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice added to talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article and the articles Christian Democratic Union of Germany and CDU/CSU are constantly being disruptively edited by several IPs making exactly the same edits, guaranteed to be a single IP-hopper. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 04:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – ip editors keep vandalising. CosXZ (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

for 4 months CosXZ (talk) 19:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Professor Penguino (talk) 02:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Average American conservative media figure who gets vandalised by IPs multiple times a month when not semi'd. BrigadierG (talk) 03:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another page where I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page (under AP, although BLP is just as relevant). Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The BLP issues seem significant on this one so I updated the notice. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalisms by IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 07:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month (no surprise there), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 16:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism of article with personal images in the last 3 days. – robertsky (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 16:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. DarmaniLink (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to edit this page. This page will give more important articles. 27.123.253.66 (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:MrBeast is not protected. Favonian (talk) 13:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[1], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[2] and Ru04bp6[3]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2409:408A:158B:4F5F:0:0:507:C0A5 (talk) 10:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Source of the problem has been identified. It was the OP. Favonian (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting attacked by IP's again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because it showing multiple errors and multiple irrelevant statementd ....... . Dailytune (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Master (2021 film) is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[4], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[5] and Ru04bp6[6]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rastinition, extended-confirmed protection is usually limited to cases where semi-protection "has proven to be ineffective". ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[7], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[8] and Ru04bp6[9]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[10], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[11] and Ru04bp6[12]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[13], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[14] and Ru04bp6[15]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[16], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[17] and Ru04bp6[18]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[19], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[20] and Ru04bp6[21]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – At 10:03(UTC) I received an alert about being rolled back by an IP2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7[22], and after checking I found an IP that repeated the behavior of Series Ggfghhffhhgg WP:SOCK(Ggfghhffhhgg[23] and Ru04bp6[24]). Then I checked the global contribution of the IP 2001:b011:3815:5a57:fd3d:97a2:5486:68e7. After checking, I think this may be Sock Puppet cross-wiki abuse, and there are many IPs and accounts used(See Lung Fong). Rastinition (talk) 10:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 19:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Czello, there is a clear problem with the version you're defending. A staff member of the organization has come to tell you that the president and number of employees are not accurate. We should not keep this information. The promotional content though should not be in the article. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can see, they have not sourced the changes around the president or number of employees. — Czello (music) 20:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ponyo. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 09:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Davest3r08 (^_^) (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ad Orientem (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. At least 15 previous protections. That's enough. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of the sourced names of subject's wives, mainly by anon editors, claiming private or inaccurate or incorrect information in edit summaries. I directed one anon to BLP/Help, but they continued. Subject's name is similarly being removed at Suzanne Collins (actress), the second wife. Struway2 (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous additions of COI material by various accounts going back quite a while. The page was protected once in the past. ULPS (talkcontribs) 14:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kanyfug (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Dailytune (talk) 15:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of disruptive editing re nationality, after expiry of protection. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptions back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Initial protection dropped today and already there's an IP taking a stab at removing content. An extra couple of weeks of protection would be welcome. Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced, unexplained edits and possibly spreading of fake information from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2605:8d80:4a1:1005:8f3:cef3:c697:ca9f. The page is intended for libraries, not assets. 203.189.118.203 (talk) 11:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Cjse23 (talk) 21:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2023

Reason: Please add extended autoconfirmed protection to the article so it is only reserved only for those who have 500+ edits experience. There are consistent edit warring, adding things without facts or valid references. Jeremy Kusumatmadja (talk) 10:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The reporting user and another user have been warned against edit-warring. Bbb23 (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumption of pattern of petty vandalism, including addition of scare quotes (per most recent edit) going back years. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: It looks like I replied right after you with a different decision. I did see a decent number of accepted edits from non-autoconfirmed users such as [25] and [26] and pending changes didn't seem unreasonable for the the current level of disruption. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan I will defer to your judgement. But I am not a big fan of PC for articles with a high volume of editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: I definitely can see your viewpoint here and I agree about pending changes being worse in many cases. If it gets requested again, we can reconsider. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending changes protection seems appropriate. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: - IP disruption.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. – DreamRimmer (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2605:8d80:4a1:1005:8f3:cef3:c697:ca9f 203.189.118.203 (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2605:8d80:4a1:1005:8f3:cef3:c697:ca9f is adding assets, considering the fact that the page is for libraries only and worse he's doesn't care about GabrielLupin. 223.25.62.71 (talk) 11:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: 2605:8d80:4a1:1005:8f3:cef3:c697:ca9f is at it again, please protect the page, along with other library driven pages. 203.189.118.203 (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temperory Semi- Protection: High level of vandalism, change of color codes which should be uniform for the franchise Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of vandalism due to the nature of the page. DL (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. •Cyberwolf• 14:39, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many IP addresses are deleting information with untruthful edit summaries which claim the sources are invalid. SkylarEstrada (talk) 16:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been a sudden influx of IPs adding trash to the article. They either add stuff that is already mentioned [27] or unsourced useless information [28] [29] [30] [31] [32]. These IPs stick these kinds of additions into as many relations articles as they can. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. number of vandalism attempts over last 48 hours 1keyhole (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. or reduce to ECO or Semi is fine too.

Reason: Was fully protected in 2009 for page move warring, protecting admin hasn’t edited in 3 months and I see no reason for protection now.

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 21:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Tk420 (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 October 24#File:Winners.JPG, this is a highly generic filename. Therefore, it should be salted to prevent creations. — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 20:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to send threats to editors on article. Panian513 23:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's get these editors and the puppets to talk page. Moxy- 23:57, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to target article. Panian513 23:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection:

Persistent trolling and disruption by IPs. Fragrant Peony (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Date listed for the 3/18/23 earthquake is listed incorrectly. Nameofuser701 (talk) 00:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was indefinitely semi-protected almost 10 years ago because of a persistent LTA genre warrior. However, the IP editor targeting it has likely moved on since then. A strict read of policy discourages me from unprotecting it myself because I've been editing the article pretty heavily. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous editors or IP addresses were vandalizing this article persistently. StewieGriffin&EricCartman (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's get these editors to talk page. Moxy- 23:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moxy, both participants had already been blocked. No new edits have been made since. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:06, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added CTOPS notice to talk page (ARBHORN) since it definitely qualifies. Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism. They have been spoken to about edit warring but they keep using alternate IP addresses to revert the work without bringing it to the talk page nor sourcing anything. Maxwell King123321 01:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same reason as above. Maxwell King123321 01:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Isabelle Belato: Please reconsider. There is an edit war going on between IP editors that has been happening for days now. It is still happening despite there being a talk page thread, which I have asked one of the IP editors to contribute to. You could literally put a stop to this by semi-protecting the page, which I have asked for and other admins like @Sergecross73 and Ad Orientem: have granted before. A content dispute doesn't mean page protection shouldn't happen—it should to stop disruption and edit warring by multiple IP editors. Ss112 03:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anon making unsourced changes. – robertsky (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 06:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Non-logged users are vandalising this page. Please raise the protection level to prevent further vandalism. Sushant (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: With the involvement in the Israel-Hamas war by firing missiles on Israel and being intercepted by USA and Saudi Arabia, it is now a full part of the Arab-Israeli conflict with this event taking place. Arab-Israel conflict arbitration enforcement basically, as one of Houthis main objectives is the destruction of Israel as well.... ArnavSharma602 (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 07:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy, but because they are hard 06:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 07:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users, since the article protection was recently removed. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary protection requested, disruptive IP JJNito197 (talk) 11:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple IP's now, can you review your decision please before I take this to ANI. JJNito197 (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done for one week. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Similar unsourced changes / disruptive POV push started almost immediately after the article protection expired - [33] [34]. The previous edits (disruption of census figures and POV) for which the article was protected - [35] [36] [37]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism and BLP attacks. Chanaka L (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 10:08, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 13:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection requested: A sentence was correctly deleted at 22:35 1 November in line with the BLP policy of not naming low-profile children. This sentence was previously being edited back and forth from 12 October to 1 November, including by logged out accounts. I have a connection to the family. Pipshear (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 09:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 10:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done; Redirect. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: attemps to remove references to the page or undoing changes Libernius (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 16:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism OrcaLord (talk) 14:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 17:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected for a period of three days. As soon as the page protection expired, the same vandalism returns from IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:48, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/unsourced changes. Magitroopa (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 18:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection or indefinite extended confirmed protection Content dispute/edit war. Subject is running in a high-profile election in November 2024 and should have restrictions like perhaps 1RR added since its covered by WP:ARBAP2. I'd do it but I consider myself WP:INVOLVED from past edits. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 19:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:ImTheCool. Binksternet (talk) 19:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP has been trying for a few days to vandalise the page. Veverve (talk) 19:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism on a BLP began again after the previous protection was lifted. Pointing out that I am a COI/Paid editor. Cduffymul (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent target of vandalism, including some borderline oversightable stuff within the last hour. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by IP hopper. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03 November 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There has been a series of new editors trying to have a YouTube video added to the "in popular culture". None of the additions have used a reliable source. There was a talk page discussion as well. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed my mind. Not all are new editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Ad Orientem (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Contentious topic restriction: WP:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CTOP A/I is a stretch here and there have only been a handful of edits in the past year. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To Protect my edits. XY League (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined In fact, you're close to getting blocked if you keep edit warring. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 21:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple users SB7252006 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 107.217.40.7 (talk · contribs). I only see one editor that is being disruptive recently, 107.217.40.7. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Since the start of the current Israel-Gaza/Hamas conflict, this has been a target for IP and newly registered accounts. It had partial protection against anonymous and non-autoconfirmed editors for four days starting on 21 October, but this has since expired. Activity had died down, but it has spiked again today. Perhaps another four day protection at the same level? --OuroborosCobra (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two new editors, who's only edits seem to be this page. Edit war is now taking place between them. Conflict seems, to be on and off, for at least four months or more. Probably need some time away from the page, build some experience but I doubt that will happen. Conlinp (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Both editors warned. If this resumes drop me a line or report to WP:ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article, and among many other articles in this topic area, is constantly being disrupted by countless socks of AndresHerutJaim.. John Yunshire (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Not enough disruption to justify going to ECP. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 02:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 03:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple users adding racist slurs and edit-warring. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been protected for another one year period by admin User:Izno but at least two different editors question this decision and per a discussion at User talk:Izno the protecting admin is open to a second admin taking a fresh look at this page and potentially changing the protection to a longer period of time. Given the vandalism history at this page and the fact that the egregious BLP violations resumed just minutes after the previous one year semi-protection expired, can we do this? This Heart of Mine (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Izno. Favonian (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: While the article discusses the current frontline in Ukraine, I feel Extended Confirmed protection is excessive for a page with not that many contributors before the change. I will also be watching the page, since I got the article to GA, to revert any potential vandalism or POV pushing. Cheers! Johnson524 13:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The XCP is there to enforce WP:GS/RUSUKR. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 14:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – per Jéské, the community has decided that only extended-confirmed users may edit articles relating to the current war. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs adding reams of unsourced/POV text. Seasider53 (talk) 20:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism after this interview in which subject mentions Wikipedia. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 09:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: In the two years since this aFd, the draft has been expanded. Please view it and see if it is worth moving to this title in the mainspace. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was declined yesterday and I see you've resubmitted. The AfC process will take care of this. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Indeed. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Too many Vandalism, Like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Baqotun0023 (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 09:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 12:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks by Ymblaster, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism that had been going on for a very long time. Skitash (talk) 14:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced sociological edit-warring. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think now that it might need a higher protection level; it appears that meatpuppetry is afoot. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note c. claims the killed Palestinians include "2,2405 women". This is an obvious typo, it should read "2,405 women". 77.252.47.183 (talk) 15:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. Someone just fixed this. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, thanks! 77.252.47.183 (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Subject of the article is no longer an active NFL player in the public eye. Is PC protection really necessary anymore? This Heart of Mine (talk) 03:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotectedWP:DENY sock of banned user. Favonian (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Subject of the article is no longer an active NFL player in the public eye. Is PC protection really necessary anymore? This Heart of Mine (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotectedWP:DENY sock of banned user. Favonian (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Subject of the article is no longer an active NFL player in the public eye. Is PC protection really necessary anymore? This Heart of Mine (talk) 03:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotectedWP:DENY sock of banned user. Favonian (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Subject of the article is no longer an active NFL player in the public eye. Is PC protection really necessary anymore? This Heart of Mine (talk) 03:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotectedWP:DENY sock of banned user. Favonian (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Does this page fall under arbitration enforcement for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? This Heart of Mine (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWP:DENY sock of banned user. Favonian (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned that the title ("Israel–Hamas war") may represent a subtle bias -- considering that Hamas governs Gaza, and Israel has attacked Gaza itself, it is probably more fair to refer to this as an "Israel-Gaza War" (action in West Bank is probably not substantial enough yet to necessarily call it "Israel-Palestine War" at present).

While many outlets are referring to this as the "Israel-Hamas War," some of this may even constitute a feedback loop with Wikipedia, since many turn to Wikipedia for access to information. Some outlets Wikipedia considers reliable, such as BBC have been referring to it as the "Israel-Gaza War" (see here: https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-44124396) so there IS at least some precedent for the monicker's usage. Jackwc123 (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jackwc123 : There was a discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1181585273#Requested_move_15_October_2023 concerning this, reading it might be useful. NotAGenious (talk) 06:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I missed that, thank you. Jackwc123 (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Renaming discussion referred to above appears to have closed the issue – for now, at least. Favonian (talk) 18:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent removal of content by various IPs, likely the same person. Captainllama (talk) 23:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Different IPs, likely same person Adakiko (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive edit summaries - article being used as a talk page between various newer accounts. Panian513 15:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based upon the edit summaries, and the edit summaries on the article itself, it appears that they are using the edit summaries for trade. Panian513 15:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The same cycle repeats itself here, the page is protected, the protection expires and persistent vandalism and disruption resumes. It would save both pending changes reviewers and vandalism patrollers time to indefinitely semi-protect this article. TylerBurden (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism HappyBoi3892 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive/silly edits by some IPs and disruptive edits by IP socks. Mtattrain (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 21:20, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04 November 2023

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC) 16:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC) 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NoNAja (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also WP:REVDEL the IPs edits, they're putting in a sexually explicit image. IanDBeacon (talk) 21:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New target of both IP's and registered users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Would consider protection for a few more weeks as the series continues to air. --Another Believer (Talk) 21:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:35, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Community-sanctioned topic: WP:GS/RUSUKR. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long-term edit warring between IPs over birthplace. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – By multiple IPs. Maliner (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very persistent vandalism, presumably by one user at multiple IPs. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, Caracas WP:LTA. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple bouts of vandalism, including 3 times this week. XCBRO172 (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruptive editing by sock-hopping anonymous editors to BLP article. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. livelikemusic: I'll note that none of the disruptive edits seem related to our BLP policies, nor are there clear indications of sockpuppeting. Please be more careful when adding requests here. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — IP address is vandalism this page. 50.74.76.26 (talk) 00:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits/vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of sockpuppetry. Catfurball (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Activity of disruptive editing seems low, but if the socking persists, let me know. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. DarmaniLink (talk) 00:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The page was just semi-protected, let's see how that goes for a while before we contemplate ECP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Afrodiaspora 013 (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done; Editor likely meant to protect a different page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — It was vandalism by IP address. 24.46.161.67 (talk) 04:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. (24.46.161.67 (talk))

The war currently has far many participants from many countries eg: Lebanon, Syria and most recently even Yemen, using "Hamas" as an umbrella term for all of these factions is inaccurate and should be changed. F aisal (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with replacing Hamas with "Gaza" or even "Palestine" (saying "Hamas" has implications for the recognition of Hamas as the body which governs Gaza, therefore I see "Israel-Hamas War" as being biased terminology), but those other countries are mostly "peripheral" within the war. A lot of wars spill over borders or involve outside participants -- Italy fought in the Austro-Prussian War, but its name is not recognized in the war's title because the war wasn't really seen as being "about" Italy. This war is "about" Palestine (and Gaza in particular). Jackwc123 (talk) 21:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. Failure to follow instructions. Edit requests hare are not intended for high visibility active articles. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done There is a one-month moratorium on changing the page title; see the FAQ at the top of the talk page. Levivich (talk) 03:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the following paragraph under the "Reactions in Israel" section:

Content that has led to these arrests includes quoting from the Quran, prayers for peace,....

1. The source used does not mention anywhere "prayers for peace", but "prayers for the people of Gaza". Thus, "for peace" should be removed.

2. It is not Adalah who claims this but a single person named Adi Mansour. See source.

Besides, the section as a whole includes original research and should be revised; see WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY. Deerove (talk) 12:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Failure to follow instructions. Make the request on the article talk page. That was not done. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist the talk page is ECP protected. Galobtter (talk) 03:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done it says "prayers for the people of Gaza" now Levivich (talk) 03:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There's nothing helpful with the edits of the IPs here in the article. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 02:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent vandalism, WP:ARBPIA. Aydoh8 (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Huge amount of racist or random vandalism edits from anonymous IPs. Poketama (talk) 11:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, ECP. 180.216.226.245 (talk) 22:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Is this correct?. NotAGenious (talk) 06:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you NotAGenious (talk) 08:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Arab–Israeli conflict is designated as a contentious topic. | Orgullomoore (talk) 01:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I didn't see that you had to choose between temp and indef and the default was temp in redwarn. I'm not sure which option is more appropriate. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as before same user using different IPs keep adding a non notable film that has been discussed on the talk page (that they refuse to engage in) to not include. They have made legal threats before. Mike Allen 23:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, if they continue, they need to be blocked; if they change the ip and continue this disruption, then we can protect the page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A decent bit of vandalism coming from anonymous IPs and newly made users. Would it be possible to raise the page protection level to semi-protected? Thank you for considering this request. Kalariwarrior (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection is unneeded because no one is making bad edits. Missbellanash (talk) 04:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is protected to enforce the general sanctions in the topic area and cannot be unprotected unless/until that sanction is successfully appealed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 05:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was an appeal. Please stick to the topic.
Missbellanash (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you look more closely at the word "appealed" in that reply to you. This venue is not the appropriate one to appeal an Arbitration remedy. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Directions have been given. Favonian (talk) 08:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Since September 13, 2023, more than two newly registered users have continued to add poorly sourced or unsourced materials, not balancing the neutrality of the article and trying to push a caste-based agenda and declare the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty as being of Rajput origin by using unverified and unreliable random journals that also failed WP:V. Especially a user Rawna Praveen Singh Solanki. He already received more than four level warnings for disruptive editing before, and he is removing and vandalizing the page and also trying to declare the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty as Rajput, but Rajput itself is a community that was formed in the early 13th century, even after the fall of the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty, and both are unrelated to each other.

I would like to suggest an upgrade in the article's protection level to indefinite protection since there is a high chance of further vandalism or the inclusion of unsourced information, even before more than four editors revert the revisions of this disruptive addition. I want to include some links that clearly show their vandalism or disruptive editing. [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Fancy vißes (call) 00:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Fancy vibes! But the princess is in another castle!Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 05:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – First of all, pending changes is weaker than the semi-protection currently in place. Secondly, the current issues seem to be about the edits of a single editor, and those are best handled at WP:ANI. Favonian (talk) 10:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent Vandalism — In Addition is unsources. 24.46.161.67 (talk) 04:25, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.46.160.0/22 (talk · contribs). Oddly, IPs from this range seem to edit-war against each other over several articles, not all of them subway-related. Curiouser and curiouser. Favonian (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP vandalism; page should be protected due to unsourced content additions until 8 November. Happily888 (talk) 07:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:a858:6080::/64 (talk · contribs). Ongoing problem spread over several articles. Favonian (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A banned sock is carrying out a vendetta here. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sirfurboy, you need to stop. I am not a ‘banned sockpuppet’ and you know that full well. Please recall that you unsuccessfully tried to have me blocked before by reporting me to a sock puppet investigation page, claiming I was a 'suspected sockpuppet' (the IP 148.252.159.66 on the list), yet no action was taken against me then when editors could have done so if they thought it was warranted. If you've decided that that is wrong and I am still a sockpuppet you need to use the appropriate channels to report me for this - and frankly I would encourage you to do so. You haven’t, and instead are just unjustifiably deleting my talk(!) and unilaterally declaring that I am a banned sock, without any mandate to make such a declaration. Please see WP:TPO. You know full well that I've told you that I became involved in the previous related Michael Stone discussion after being notified about the discussion by a user who it has now materialised is a sock, but which I was unaware of at the time 148.252.159.203 (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Only 2 people on Wikipedia have carried out a vendetta against Richard Gill. Banned sock, MeltingDistrict (who, prior to his ban, also had a topic ban from editing anywhere on anything to do with Gill owing to that vendetta) and this IP editor, who claims he is only here, commenting on Gill's page, because banned sock, MeltingDistrict, asked him to provide an opinion (without any direction) on a completely different page that has nothing to do with Gill. He leads us to believe that he is entirely impartial and has just arrived at this page as if by magic, but definitely nothing to do with meatpuppetry (despite his edsums indicating he is a meatpuppet). By their admission they are a meatpuppet, but I would lay considerable money on it just being MeltingDistrict. IP has no other edits.  Looks like a duck to me. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, twinkle requested the EC protection when I chose sockpuppetry as the reason. Semi protection would be sufficient. It is IP socking. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sirfurboy, stop misleading people with these paranoid, untrue and accusatory summaries which are really making me quite angry for being totally assaulted for something I am not even guilty of. I have never had any "vendetta against Richard Gill" -- in fact, until I followed your edits on his talk from the Michael Stone Rfc where you had argued with the now-blocked editor who had asked my for my views -- I literally did not know the guy. But as an editor I saw the himself-blocked Gill110951's misconduct and disagreed with your comments that I saw there, which were related to the now-blocked editor who had got me involved in this in the first place. So I obviously didn't "just arrive at this page as if by magic". Yet here you are making it sound like there was no reason for me to be on the Gill110951 talk page, when I -- and I've told you this like thousands of times now -- became involved in all of this because of the antics of the now-blocked editor. But what is really quite ridiculous here is that -- having failed to get others to block me -- you are now turning to the requests for page protection page to make a series of inflammatory, paranoid remarks about me, which are nothing to do with page protection. I've told you, go through the usual processes if you are so insistent that the decision of others to not block me is wrong, but rather curiously... you don't want to. 148.252.159.203 (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – The matter is now at ANI. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NoNAja (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 13:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Amigao (talk) 13:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NoNAja (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page has now been recreated and passed AfC under a new name. Reinstate earlier semi-protection by @Isabelle Belato: from before the page was deleted. See previous page history and frequent need to RD2/oversight because of vandalism targeting an employee (hi!). lizthegrey (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of until May 2024, as was the case previously before recreation, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiLinuz (talk) 18:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. SparklyNights 19:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.RegentsPark (comment) 20:01, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A new long semi-protection is needed. The last expired just few days ago and again I've started again to revert unsourced edits. Island92 (talk) 12:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not a huge number of problematic edits in the last week, but plenty of evidence of issues further back in page history and the fact that issues arose so soon after unprotection is persuasive. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05 November 2023

Reason: This page is set to be highly edited with untruthful content and high level of vandalism so I would request for a page protection. Imwikki13 (talk) 19:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively.RegentsPark (comment) 20:02, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits/vandalism by both IP's and registered users ever since protections expired in late June. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GFOLEY FOUR!02:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone keeps editing this article with an explicit image. HurricaneKappa (talk) 03:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP range originating from South Korea in which they kept removing the redirect with content that they copy-paste from other articles in which the hatnote was also dated 2012/14 hence this is clearly not their own creation otherwise the dates in the hatnote made zero sense. This is the same person that previously vandalized other articles with the same described behaviour where I also requested indefinite RPP for.[43] Also note that, one of the IP (211.251.53.225) was blocked previously for this disruptive behaviour, which has since expired and they has since hopped to another range. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks and three months, respectively, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Several IPs keep adding information about Mac Jones' comparison to Tom Brady throwing pick sixes. The editors who revert the IPs say this article is about Mac Jones himself, and I agree with them. I think this page needs to be protected until the edit warring stops. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection would suffice; ECP or full protection is not needed to deal with IP vandalism. lizthegrey (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Lizthegrey On Twinkle options, there's no way to actually request semi-protection for edit warring. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Has been subject recently to lots of disruptive editing- lots of block evasion/LTA, even after the recent protection that ended on September 23. Magitroopa (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, particularly changing the image in the infobox. Tymewalk (talk) 04:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism on the page in recent days. There is also an active edit war taking place on there. Zippo9310 (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from IP editors and also adding unsourced info since Nov 1, 2023. Cassiopeia talk 23:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple new accounts trying to introduce copyvio image. – robertsky (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Also Spain women's national football team and most likely others: an IP user is adding excessive and completely non-encyclopedic Women's World Cup summaries, with close paraphrasing, and reverting its removal. With no women's international matches for a while, there shouldn't need to be any updates, so page protection will not harm genuine use but should discourage an IP wannabe journalist from warring over their content. Kingsif (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:Semi-protection because of rumored Inter Miami move, not wanting IPs to channel misinformation onto the page. Char3290 (talk) 04:17, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I also assume you meant Luis Suárez for the article. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 08:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits by IP users[44][45][46]. Requesting 1-week protection until the airing of upcoming episode of WWE SmackDown (waiting for WWE confirmation). Mann Mann (talk) 05:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent bad faith edit warring by Mewulwe. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., please sort out the differences at the talk page rather than keep endlessly edit-warring.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 08:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Semi-protection expired today and within a few hours it was vandalised again by the same IP-farm. The Banner talk 12:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Actually Iam an IP myself. I just wanted any senior editor to see and confirm if a the user Spartan Alpha is not in violation of WP:SOCKPUPPET. He seems to be adding content that is in violation of WP:Undue and WP:BLP 182.183.46.44 (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I changed the protection level on second thought, after a discussion with a blocked participant of the edit war made clear that this is deep within WP:A/I/PIA territory.
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change Flagship Entertainment Group library (only films co-produced with Warner Bros. Pictures) to Flagship Entertainment Group film library (49%) (only films co-produced with Warner Bros. Pictures) 2605:8D80:4A1:F2DC:59FB:8776:1EFC:B096 (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Protection should be raised, per Wikipedia:A/I/PIA arbitration enforcement. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC) 16:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing changing of the end-date by anons to whatever today's date is. Can we *please* edit-protect this article & give it some teeth? Like maybe *not* "pending-changes" but rather confirmed/auto-confirmed? Thx. Shearonink (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing mass blanking by multiple IPs. Given the user who first blanked the page is a confirmed sock of an LTA, I believe the IPs may be same. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 17:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that... (information regarding the role of the Israeli forces in the deaths of Israelis at Kibbutz Be'eri: https://mondoweiss.net/2023/10/a-growing-number-of-reports-indicate-israeli-forces-responsible-for-israeli-civilian-and-military-deaths-following-october-7-attack/ be added to the article "2023 Israel-Hamas war," which I am unable to edit (I also cannot add to the talk page)) . 94.173.238.167 (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because the request is not specific enough. The request must be in the form "change X to Y" or "add X after Y" or "remove X" with appropriate sources cited, and the reasoning behind the request. If you cannot edit the talk page, then a well-formed request can be posted there in your behalf. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced additions and outright vandalism. Sjö (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – sockmaster itself is targeting LTA casepage. #prodraxis connect 18:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page seems to be prone to vandalism/disruptive editing. I would suggest a long protection period personally Michaeldble (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is already protected by the title blacklist, so its current protection is just preventing page movers from moving the page. As a non-TPE pagemover, there are a couple of changes I wanted to make (namely, using semantic markup for emphasis per MOS:BOLD). The protecting admin is both no longer an admin and inactive. HouseBlastertalk 17:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated readdition of promotional material by sock accounts and obvious IP socks of User:Applus2021. Wikishovel (talk) 14:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP accounts constant disruptive editing the lead section with false information. Edl-irishboy (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page Vandalism. Trying to list 2023 Israel–Hamas war as America being involved in the war when it is not an active belligerent (as shown on the main page) or listing 2023 American–Middle East conflict as a new War for America when the article again shows that it is a part of the ongoing Syrian civil war. With this conflict, it does seem likely that this will be an ongoing issue for the time being. DarkAzure (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Community sanctions enforcement. Since September 13th, the article Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty has been vandalized, and many senior editors have reverted poorly sourced and unverified sourced articles, but there is a similar pattern being used to vandalize by a single user who is not admitting thr policy of neutrality according to Wikipedia and is against the Community sanctions enforcement. So I sincerely propose that the protection level be increased to indefinite because there is a high risk of unsourced, unverified information and disruptive contributions by some users. And leaving some links to investigate vandalism, disruptive editing using unverified, arbitrarily picked Colonial era sources and journals—all of which failed verifiability. [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53] Fancy vißes (call) 21:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fancy vibēs, could you please specify which sanctions (or which contentious topic area) exactly you are referring to? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IPA would be the most likely, but let's wait and see what they have to say. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My bet is on CASTE because only these are "community sanctions". I'm happy to see that at least one other guess exists, so my question is clearly necessary. Especially as neither of these two mandates WP:ARBECR. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree
I was referring to Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups Caste-based sanctions. Articles about caste, clan, or history in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. So kindly increase the page's protection level for the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty because, in the future, there is a great chance of vandalism, the addition of poorly sourced content, or the removal of well-sourced material by auto-confirmed users who are usually unfamiliar with Wikipedia's basic standards. Fancy vißes (call) 22:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your prompt response. Fancy vißes (call) 23:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of unsourced edits and original research stuff added by IP users in less than 12H. Requesting 1-month protection to reach a stable revision. Mann Mann (talk) 07:32, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruption. Appears to be part of a ban evasion according to the two previous editors in their edit summaries. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 20:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06 November 2023

Reason: Persistent vandalism--nationalistic claims. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. TornadoLGS (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Materialscientist: It looks like dueling administrator actions happened. I restored your duration, but I logged it as WP:CT/BLP enforcement since it was a bit of a leap. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits/vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 13:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Several IPs have been making controversial edits to the article; it's best if only EC editors do so. Nythar (💬-🍀) 08:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:04, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 23:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC) 23:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Non-EC editors making controversial edits. Nythar (💬-🍀) 08:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Non-EC editors making controversial edits. Nythar (💬-🍀) 08:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. Fragrant Peony (talk) Fragrant Peony (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. With recent productive edits by IPs, and only minor disruption in the past month, protection is not justified. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Steady stream of disruptive edits, which have been reverted by two different editors. Dormskirk (talk) 23:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Plastikspork. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obnoxious ip hopper vandalism. $chnauzer 00:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Muboshgu. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to spam inappropriate images. Panian513 00:53, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to spam inappropriate images. Panian513 00:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by non autoconfirmed users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to spam inappropriate images. Panian513 03:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Since page protection expired on 2023-10-13, 17/17 IP address edits have been reverted for inserting changes into the article that violate WP:BLP by making the article appear to agree with the subject's baseless accusations. Rjjiii (talk) 03:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal using multiple IP addresses to target article and spam inappropriate images. Panian513 03:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Materialscientist. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 04:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 04:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page repeatedly gets edited to include some form of statement that the movie is the "final" installment of the film series. Though it is marketed as "the last chapter", we know that it isn't the last movie because there are 2 more movies currently in development. To avoid any more statements of this (without sources), a protection for the article may be needed. DisneyMetalhead (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 00:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Khirurg (talk) 02:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CTOPS notice also added to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Palestine/Israel related article (WP:A/I/PIA) WillowCity(talk) 03:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightoil (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, protection just expired, re-report if vandalism continues in next few days GFOLEY FOUR!04:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits/vandalism, with almost no edits being productive. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 00:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Agreed, most are disruptive, but infrequent and reverted. GFOLEY FOUR!04:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Rv vandalized this page. 2605:8D80:4A1:F2DC:59FB:8776:1EFC:B096 (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected GFOLEY FOUR!04:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – WMF legal banned user. Accidentally templated a pointless message to them, want to avoid this happening again on accident by other editors and me. Awesome Aasim 03:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This seems to happen very infrequently. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User repeatedly removing sourced content Magherbin (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Aurelius5150 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 1 week under ARBHORN. CTOPS notice also added to article talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued promotional and inept editing. Drmies (talk) 12:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism in the last few hours, including (now oversighted) images of penises being added to the infobox. I usually would wait for more vandalism before requesting page protection but because multiple IPs are being used and because this is on the *front page* of Wikipedia (in the In The News) section I figured it needed it more. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently abused by LTA using open proxies. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 08:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rotary Engine talk 08:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 14:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism; arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBPIA). Aydoh8 (talk) 10:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Try semi-protection first. Move to ECP in the future if needed. Fuzheado | Talk 14:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – What appears to be one IP-hopping user engaged in a slow-mo edit war to make one very small, unhelpful, unnecessary edit. AntiDionysius (talk) 13:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long running lead reverts. Moxy- 19:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any help would be great have 3 editor's talking with the ip to no avail. Wondering if a range block may be in order?Moxy- 04:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Moxy: I'm not sure a range block would be of use, as the various IPs making the changes are from very different ranges. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Casting and character are unsourced, series is yet to be release. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs massively inflating the American casualty count. When reverted, they come back. CutlassCiera 13:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep on changing the WP:COMMONNAME [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May be sock of this LTA, who has a habit of contravening WP:COMMONNAME policy. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now doing the same in List of districts of Maharashtra article. See [61] [[62]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sustained disruption by anonymous editor who persists in adding a serial comma against conventions of Br English. Has been recurring since August (see 21–23 August, 8 September and 5 November). Betty Logan (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: He is a senior indian army officer and informations releated to his are very important in nature. Dwikifirst (talk) 11:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm not sure what rule keeps you from calling someone's trans-daughter their son, but it's being repeatedly undone. Nswix (talk) 13:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC) 18:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users in the last few days. TheHotwiki (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow edit war over the addition of a nonnotable youtube video, against consensus. Slatersteven (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. John of Reading (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Cryptic. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sock edit warring over the past two weeks. Generalrelative (talk) 15:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring from block evading IPs. MrOllie (talk) 16:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism/unsourced POV edits to ethnicity information in the article. Started as far back as January 2023 at least ([63]), continuing intermittently throughout the year, but now quite frequently in the last few days ([64], [65], [66], [67], [68]). Few other constructive edits during this time. (Similar disruption is also happening at Mzab (Moroccan tribe).). R Prazeres (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See talk and recent history. There is a bunch of unproductive removal of content. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 17:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:57, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Ravensfire (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing of a trans BLP. Request indefinite semi. Funcrunch (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse, multiple IPs and proxies. Same nonsense added every time.[69][70][71][72]. Binksternet (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. Pending changes isn't enough to ward off vandals. BangJan1999 22:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject of this BLP tweeted something, but it hasn't been covered in RS. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07 November 2023

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:51, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sockmaster has learned how to get around semi-protection. Increasing to indefinite pending changes protection recommended.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. BangJan1999 22:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption. #prodraxis connect 20:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Highly motivated IP 90.221.157.15 (and others) regularly adding unsourced content. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream/history of disruptive edits. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 07:14, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For this one I would be inclined to wait for disruption rather than protect preventively. Whereas to some extent the article is related to PIA, it is definitely not in the focus of attention of POV pushers, vandals, and edit-warriors, and may be will never be. Certainly not more than say biographies of the early 20th century Zionists. I will appreciate a second opinion. Ymblanter (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This seems reasonable to me. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of ip vandalism, if you check revision history page [[73]], you will see high level of disruptive edits, adding players that did not participated or even names that have nothing to do with handball, see source with names that were part of the team [[74]] furthermore the ip that are doing this are the same, already blocked but somehow keep changing their ip. That is why I am asking for indefinite semi protection of the page. Theonewithreason (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 01:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuing of adding unsourced/unreliable source from IPs. LancedSoul (talk) 21:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing by two IPs, likely the same editor, against Wikipedia guidelines and Talk page consensus. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Rewritten version of the article covers content related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. Requesting ECP protection as part of general sanction enforcement on this topic as per ArbCom decision. Horserice (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some kind of protection is probably needed for this page. There are consistently reverted edits, where an IP will add or remove something, just for it to be undone by a registered user. Of course we allow IP's to edit many pages but this page has a constant edit/revert cycle between IP's and registered users. Completely Random Guy (talk) 00:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Let's see how this works. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page, and will log under ARBEE Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent vandalism and/or POV disruption to ethnicity information in the article. Intermittent throughout this year, as far back as March at least (e.g. [75], [76], [77], [78]), but now very frequent in the last several days, including some outright vandalism in the last hour or so: [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85]. (Note: same disruption as at Chaouia (Morocco), semi-protected recently for the same reason.). R Prazeres (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – changing heights without source. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 01:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - Skipple 02:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should cover the article through the rest of college football season. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruption seem to continue @ Harapanahalli: Revision history via IP mode.

Page needs to be watch listed by more users and 3-4 week semi protection to send message of community resolve that policies can not be bypassed without joining discussion.

 Bookku    (talk) 02:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CTOPS notice added to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I promise to never add assets again. I'm sorry. 2605:8D80:4A1:F2DC:59FB:8776:1EFC:B096 (talk) 22:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Semiprotected by User:Ymblanter on 1 November. Why not try to persuade him first. EdJohnston (talk) 02:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'd like to accept Draft:Bhavika Sharma through AfC, so could you please unprotect the title? – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging protecting admin @Sir Sputnik. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article has been under indefinite semiprotection for 13 years. Maybe it's time to try unprotecting? It's a Featured Article but is far from perfect (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Hydrogen#WP:URFA/2020). I just implemented a Talk page suggestion from an IP that nobody had responded to for 3 months. I left a note on the Talk page of the protecting admin 10 days ago; he has not edited since July so he seems to be on a break. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 00:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clayoquot, this request was declined less than two weeks ago: is there a reason you brought it back here again? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry I didn't even realize I'd posted it here! I was going to post it here two weeks ago, saw a message come up that said to ask the protecting admin instead of posting here, and thought my edit had been automatically discarded. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 01:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Clayoquot, do you withdraw this? (please Reply to icon mention me on reply) Clyde [trout needed] 01:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ClydeFranklin Yes, I see two admins commented and I defer to their judgement. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 02:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. Clyde [trout needed] 02:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This was salted for repeated recreation, however YouTube poop now exists and this is a plausible redirect to that. Protecting admin was desysopped and hasn't edited for a year. Clyde [trout needed] 01:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – Muboshgu (talk) 01:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 06:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continued high level of vandalism by multiple IP addresses, despite the consensus reached with other registered users on the talk page. Dominikcapuan (talk) 19:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two incidents in the last couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 00:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article was previously protected and is being consistently vandalised by a block-evading sock puppet; see recent re-vandalism by BillieMckaySuperFan in page history. Happily888 (talk) 03:42, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content from IPs and new users. Magitroopa (talk) 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 06:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – vandalism and additions of unencylopedic, unsourced content. SamX [talk · contribs] 05:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., probably the last temporary protection before turning to an indefinite one--Ymblanter (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from IPs. They continue to change the number of children in the infobox despite there being a note next to the children parameter explaining why it shouldn't be changed. Bowling is life (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:403:281:4D60:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. from article for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP DE. eg:[86]. See apge history for more.  // Timothy :: talk  00:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added CTOPS notice to talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. LucasKannou (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked., both blocked--Ymblanter (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The actress has many anti-fans, who will definitely try to vandalize the page when they realize a Wikipedia page has been created of her. I want to request protection for a temporary period of 1-4 weeks until they move on, if it is possible. Wikiuserash24 (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Mifter (talk) 06:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer needed because the page contains error and the page is about a current-running television show that needs constant updates. Arjupatel4 (talk) 07:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Await the outcome of your edit request. Favonian (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This TV season article has screened its finale, making it unlikely that IP users will vandalise it anymore adding WP:CRYSTAL information. Happily888 (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ad Orientem: last protecting admin. Just my 2 cents: TV-series are somewhat prone to vandalism even after their actual season has ended. Lectonar (talk) 10:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Ad Orientem (talk) 13:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay D. Easy (t) 08:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Concerning amount of vandalism (pertaining to a juvenile joke) that happened over the last week, as was the case for USS Rizzi and USS Gyatt e (talk) 13:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs removing content without explanation. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired a week ago; an IP-hopping vandal is back on it. AntiDionysius (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator K6ka. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Promising draft exists at Draft:Ugo Ugochukwu which I would accept if the page wasn't creation protected. I've checked everything over and it should be notable. Please ping me if this does get removed or not. Thanks in advance. Klinetalk to me!contribs 23:14, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CambridgeBayWeather ping to protecting admin. Courcelles (talk) 15:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-disruption in November. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 50.77.172.141 (talk) 17:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent add of unsourced material by IP-hopping blocked User:Akaora. Lone-078 (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism DarnItAll34 (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption changing the sourced result in the infobox. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page creator currently being investigated at SPI. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Panamitsu (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. The user has been blocked. —Panamitsu (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a case of severe vandalism at a high level. Repeatedly, editors are altering the article's content without a proper understanding of the context. This is clearly evident from the discussion page where we've already reached a consensus on the article's content. Unfortunately, there is a lack of effort to prevent the spread of misinformation. Therefore, I kindly request that the page be protected Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged under WP:CT/IPA. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption and edit warring between IPs. StephenMacky1 (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged under WP:CT/EE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopping user persistently changing the number of Iranian MiG-29s without a source. This has been going on for weeks. ZLEA T\C 22:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article has been the target of a persistent Brazil-based IP vandal since September. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing history. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent, blatant vandalism from IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts. Professor Penguino (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 00:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring and vandalism by several IP ranges, targeting sensitive topics within the article. The article may also fall under Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles, as this leader was closely associated with the Arab–Israeli conflict. Skitash (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I suggest bringing in a third opinion. Please do not edit war, even if you believe you are right. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – POV-pushing by an IP. The Banner talk 20:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent cross-IP vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This title is widely used as an indicator of page to be deleted in a move request and should be salted as a reminder to prevent pages from actually being moved here. In the case it remains unprotected, the associated editnotice {{Editnotices/Page/Deleted to make way for page move}} should be deleted per WP:G8. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, as such mishaps seem to have only happened twice in the past half-year. I'm not sure that they are mishaps, actually: round-robin moves will involve a page being moved to a placeholder title. If this one can serve as that, I don't view it as necessarily a bad thing. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Il-Pal conflict topic. JayCubby wants you to check out his vIsUaLlY aPpEaLiNg uSeRpAgE. cHeCk It oUt! iF yOu aRe BoRiNg, cLiCk (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by IPs and new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption. One of many articles being targeted by novice copy editors, with unfortunate results. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article is becoming a sock drawer; the same editor appears to have vandalized as two different identities and one IP today. Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Request was valid at the time, but given that the article experienced its disruption primarily due to being on the Main Page and there hasn't been disruption in over four hours, there probably isn't much point in protecting it for the 38 or so minutes it has left on the Main Page. Will add it to my watchlist for a while, though. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. The Night Watch (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection; spike in disruptive editing from IPs, although it is most likely the same person hopping ranges. Yue🌙 00:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 01:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sudden IP vandalism, recurring and intensive. Suggest semi-protection for few days. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism again and again. Ajeeb Prani 🦜 ✍🏻 03:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disputation. SkylarEstrada (talk) 12:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP good faith edits that have been proven false Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk) 12:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 5.165.48.0/20 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Routine unsourced IP edits. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 17:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - Mobile editor repeated vandalising page. GoodDay (talk) 07:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I wish to continue my GA review and there has been recent incidents of conflict. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, this is not a valid protection reason. There is no ongoing edit-warring at the level which justifies protection, and this is one editor anyway. May be try talking to them. Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is a perennial magnet for low-level disruptive editing. If you look at the page history, you will see sustained single-edit IP editing that editors are having to go in and revert. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the article has never been previously edit-protected, let us try pending changes first. Ymblanter (talk) 08:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: for privacy and authentic information "chandanbhargav7" (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much every change by IP editors this year has been reverted - disruptive editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism rather infrequent. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Damaged1966 (talk) 12:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and speculation from IPs. I noticed this was article was posted on a fans Facebook Group, so I imagine the nonsense will increase. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continual vandalism from IP (or IPs) who don't agree with multiple sources. - SchroCat (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned after 1 day of expiration of protections. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP-hopping vandal keeps vandalising this, alongside several other Arleigh Burke-class ship pages. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also protected USS Jack H. Lucas for 2 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Drummingman (talk) 16:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated recreation of article following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrainPal (outcome of Redirect) by WP:SPA. Wikishovel (talk) 07:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 07:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Globally locked user. MCC214#ex umbra in solem 14:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some changes to my LTA filters that should help with that. If those aren't effective, we can revisit protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Mobile editor repeatedly making unproductive edits. GoodDay (talk) 07:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and newly created accounts. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 19:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. GnocchiFan (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of unregistered users are adding up incorrect information and destroying the article. MNWiki845 (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP users are insisting upon an unsourced claim of whether the subject is a "moderate" member of his party. It may well be the case, but there are no reliable sources or discussion in the article for such. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further, this moderate claim wasn't in the article prior to the recent flurry of edits due to the election. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @StefenTower: Airplaneman (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: vandalism and unsorced changes--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR TylerBurden (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:GS/RUSUKR. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Under Events > Invasion of the Gaza Strip (27 October-present), the article says “…the bodies of 23 missing Israel hostages were buried under the rubble.” ‘Israel’ should be ‘Israeli’ Bunnyisgreat (talk) 01:23, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of unregistered users are adding up wrong information and disrupting the article. MNWiki845 (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive and unsourced addition of content. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep on changing the WP:COMMONNAME and sourced census figures [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94]. One of which is blocked as of now, so possibly sock/meat puppetry. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the disruption is entirely from IP addresses, then semi-protection should be sufficient. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism’s and pages subject to the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict are under extended-confirmed protection due to WP:GS/AA. TagaworShah (talk) 16:26, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged under WP:CT/A-A. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep on adding crystal edits and unsourced hoaxes. Maybe protect until after after the end of the season (which is on the 26th)? Cause historically, pages blow up during the end of the season. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 19:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NoNAja (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09 November 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jjj1238, this may be sockpuppetry – I see you have already asked at Ohnoitsjamie's talk page (permanent link). I'm not sure if "vandalism" would be a correct term for describing it even then though, and there is a risk of you violating WP:BLPRESTORE with these reverts.
If this turns out to be a sockpuppet, please let me know and I'll semi-protect the page indefinitely (WP:GS/PAGEANT). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined for now ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Ohnoitsjamie has already blocked them. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update – in that case,
Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked by IP's again after protections expired yesterday. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People cannot post edit requests on the talk page or discuss the article if they aren't experienced. As I am a editor who edits occasionally, I don't think I can hit extended conformed protection. I request it gets reduced to autoconformed protection. Waylon111 (talk) 17:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waylon111, you can request edits in the section below (WP:RFPP#Current requests for edits to a protected page). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined See [95]. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to create this article about russian chemist, but wikipedia says that it is impossible to do Galcheww (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Create Draft:Vladimir Fomin (the most likely common name in English) and when you believe it's ready for publication, submit it through the WP:Articles for creation process. Favonian (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite ECP under WP:CT/BLP due to relentless BLP violations. (I applied PC protection, but subsequently made edits.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Extended-confirmed protection is not necessary when only IPs have been targeting the page. The rate of disruption now is around what pending-changes can deal with, so escalation to semi-protection is not (in my opinion) necessary at the moment. Sdrqaz (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdrqaz: You're right about ECP being unnecessary (looking again, the few problematic edits from non-IPs have been all over 500/30 or brand new). Nevertheless, I believe I erred in applying PC protection instead of semi-protection. All of the edits from IPs are serious BLP violations, seem to be coordinated, and semi-protection would be consistent with WP:PP and WP:CT/BLP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If I had been in the same position as you, Daniel, I would have either pending-changes protected it or declined the protection request. There was a spate of disruption on 5 October, but the next disruptive edit was on 31 October, a 26-day gap. Since then, there's been two disruptive edits in a week – I get where you're coming from with BLPs being under CT, but policy also allows for pending-changes for BLP violations and the frequency isn't that high. I will deactivate the RfPP template to allow another administrator to review this, but I personally wouldn't semi-protect it. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would say pending changes protection is doing fine, and semi is not needed at the moment. It might be needed if we get a couple of such edits every day. Ymblanter (talk) 07:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also think the pending changes is doing acceptably. One caveat: based on the article's long protection log and the kind of (BLP) vandalism that is happening, I would consider another long-term semiprotection. Given the above, I will decline this request with the decline template. Airplaneman (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the thing to pushes this over the threshold for me is that the edits are borderline RD2 material and something offsite seems to be driving it. Regardless of the decision, thanks for taking a look. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:44, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined as per discussion above; pending changes seems adequate for now. Airplaneman (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: The article is PC and semi-protected, yet no blatant vandalism has been detected in the recent past, so the silver gold can be removed for the time being. We can always ask for further protection again should vandalism increases in the future. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 14:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined: The page is only PC protected which seems appropriate. Based on the history in the article, unsourced changes from non-autoconfirmed users seems to be a more significant issue than vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the historical context session it only goes back to the 1967 Six Day war. I think it would be important to include context about the Nakba in 1948 as well as context about rising antisemitism in the middle east preceding the Nakba including the pogroms in the 1930-40s against Jews throughout the middle east. Babanae (talk) 20:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This is not specific enough of a edit request for someone here to handle. I think the historical context is likely to get fleshed out more over time as well. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Request page protection according to WP:ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 21:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The recent reverted edits do not seem to be related to the conflict and ECP does not seem to be necessary at this time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan Per WP:ARBPIA4, all primary articles related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, not only edits directly related, should be ECP protected. Longhornsg (talk) 22:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Page protection is a remedy that may be imposed by an uninvolved administrator under the standard set of restrictions for CT/A-I. It is not a requirement. We don't need to ECP an article that has had 2 edits in 55 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP user from Cupertino, California known here and on Fandom as Dfrenzel has been trying to add DirectTV hoax again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP user from Cupertino, California known here and on Fandom as Dfrenzel has been trying to add DirectTV hoax again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has come to my attention after seeing Verdis in the media again that it might be time to unblock it and allow the creation of the article. Last time it was deleted because of controversy. Here are some articles that I have found for 2023. The old article has more: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verdis&oldid=1117403061. The first link includes information about their 'president' being arrested. 2023 articles: https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/melbourne-teenager-becomes-europes-newest-president,18022 https://www.mylondon.news/lifestyle/travel/southall-teenager-sets-up-new-26385041 https://metro.co.uk/2023/04/30/verdis-the-sovereign-state-on-croatia-and-serbias-disputed-border-18689539/ https://birdinflight.com/svit/verdis.html https://issuu.com/starnewsgroup/docs/2023-07-18_rt_633/1 https://birdinflight.com/svit/verdis.html https://www.courrierdesbalkans.fr/Danube-le-fleuve-ou-peuvent-naitre-des-utopies-1-3-Bienvenue-en-Syldavie-si-ce-n-est-en-Bordurie https://redian.news/wxnews/299348 https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/20-wild-attempts-to-create-crypto-micronations-or-communities/

Older articles: https://total-croatia-news.com/news/politics/verdis-republic/ https://www.b92.net/zivot/vesti.php?yyyy=2021&mm=09&dd=20&nav_id=1925054 https://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/osnovali-drzavu-na-nasem-spornom-teritoriju-cilj-nam-je-pomirenje-naroda-1524432 https://www.pagina12.com.ar/371297-verdis-la-eco-republica-libre-que-preside-un-pibe-de-17-anos the list continues.

It has also been over a year since the article was protected. I would like to re-create it and if anyone objects, they could put up an afd?

MicroSupporter (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would actually create a draft article and get it thru AfC first. While it will take longer, if the draft is high-quality and well sourced it will provide a much stronger argument in favour of unprotection than "just trust me, bro", which is your whole argument here (sources notwithstanding). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined: See explanation from Jéské Couriano. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
oh ok thanks MicroSupporter (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of multi-IP spambot. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. A non-notable scandal happened with the American Mathematics Competition and now editors are trying to add poorly source info about it Noah 💬 00:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 04:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism yvanyblog(talk) 01:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same disruptive IP editing continuing only about 5 hours after page protection expired. Loafiewa (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I warned the user about edit warring. If they resume, please report to WP:ANEW. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war from user Phạm Huy Thông making repeated attempts/reversions to the page without engaging in discussion on the Talk page to resolve disagreements. TJ 22:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If edit warring continues consider WP:ANEW. Aoidh (talk) 03:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multi-IP vandal is adding grossly defamatory content. It's only happened twice but given the severity of the issue, it may warrant protection (and/or suppression of the edit history). AntiDionysius (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the latter has already been done by Discospinster, possibly without seeing this request. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But the IP is back a third and fourth time, and has announced their intention to keep doing the same thing. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 06:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has become the latest target for the IP harassment vandal. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 06:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 01:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continue disruptive edits from same userm he was warned in his talk page and continue with his edits. Request for an increased protection to page and for at least 1 year Aldebaran69 (talk) 02:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption 4 days ago; disruptive edits few and far between, overall. Lectonar (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 13:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent block evasion. Keeps being edited by jake flores •Cyberwolf• 14:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change Warner Bros., Home Box Office, Inc., Cable News Network, Inc. and DC Comics to Warner Bros., Home Box Office, Inc., Cable News Network, Inc. and DC Comics. 96.52.29.29 (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive and unsourced edits from IPv6 editor in reasonably broad range. Ravensfire (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'll never add assets again. And GabrielLupin is the creator of the company libraries. 96.52.29.29 (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't decline my request this time. I promise. 96.52.29.29 (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to edit this page. 96.52.29.29 (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please. It has been protected for 7 months. So don't decline my request this time. 96.52.29.29 (talk) 17:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding names of non-notable relatives in infobox contravening the guidelines laid down in template documentation. IPs also adding honorifics in infobox |name= contravening guidelines for the template parameter as well as MOS:HON WP:NCIN [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal switching between various IPs and accounts. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An ip has posted this link [102], with the admissions of intent to, or having already vandalised the article. Knitsey (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Wbm1058. Favonian (talk) 20:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by BuickCenturyDriver after expiration of previous semi. --Finngall talk 19:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. Favonian (talk) 20:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because Battle of Sylhet is well known for India's victory over pakistan. Result:- Indian Victory. http://www.indiandefencereview.com/battle-of-sylhet-1971-war/ ABCD0106 (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by BuickCenturyDriver after expiration of previous semi. --Finngall talk 19:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, such as adding (চোদনা) [Bengali for "fucking"] to his name in the infobox. Worldbruce (talk) 20:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Worldbruce: Please see if any of the recent edits need reversion. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – And some vandalism. S0091 (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to request extended confirm, just semi. S0091 (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Needs semi-protection against IP edits. An IP editor bouncing around from IP address to IP address (so far 2601:19b:c700:2270:b995:dbc1:9521:fbfc, 132.205.229.131, and 132.205.229.24 - so probably not very effectively blockable, though one has been blocked already) is edit-warring against multiple editors to include the IP's insipid pet picture in the article. The pic itself was uploaded to Commons by User:Momotheturkishvan (who has done nothing else) and this is clearly the same person; they referred to the illustrated cat by the name Momo at Talk:Turkish Van#Picture and on my talk page. This is an attempt to abuse WP as a memorial site for their pet, with a picture of a cat belly that is in no way illustrative of the Turkish Van breed and could be of any pale long-haired cat. Turned hostile in edit summaries [103] and made a promise/threat "I'm gonna keep doing it" [104] so is almost certainly going to be back in a few minutes or hours from another IP address.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  22:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Poorly sourced content and violations of WP:NOR by two Colombian IPs and a new user making the same edits. Binksternet (talk) 23:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User in question has agreed to desist from making said edits. bibliomaniac15 22:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonteemil (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. bibliomaniac15 22:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. bibliomaniac15 22:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Please put semi-protection tag on this page which represents a highly controversial unsolved double murder case in India. Rourib Dutta (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was three days ago and the disruption these two weeks have been soley from 2409:40D1:1010:5367:ED50:5C51:BFE0:4118/35 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). Please warn them before reporting to WP:AIV if they continue. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-lasting, persistent vandalism from multitude of IP addresses and new accounts due to subject's similarity to a slur. Panian513 02:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring. Panian513 17:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 06:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from unregistered user(s) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 06:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued addition of poorly written and unsourced material from what appears to be the same user with similar IP addresses. Please look at the edit history. This has been going on for years. JlACEer (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. JlACEer (talk) 05:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Cjse23 (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. An editor was blocked for 31 hours on 8 November for edit warring, but has not continued since their block expired. Aoidh (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Another magnet for test edits by new users, with attendant disruptions. The edits are so voluminous that it's difficult to go back through and revert something as recent as a day or two past. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:A55D:AC7D:CD54:BBE9 (talk) 23:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: After further review, it looks like this article is being assigned as a newcomer task exceptionally frequently. Rather than protecting it, I'm going to raise this as an issue with the Growth Team. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. MrFlyingPies23 (?Talk?) | (*Contrib*) 05:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Aoidh (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistently disruptive editing, be it IP or IP turned registered user or newly registered. Article has been protected staggering of 15 times previously per log. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 09:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. and logged under NEWBLPBAN. Courcelles (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject is on the verge of a breakthrough transfer to FC Bayern Munich and temporary protection could be helpful in preventing any vandalism on the page. JC Kotisow (talk) 10:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism by people looking to make Israel/Palestine edits Pdhadam (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not related enough to call this arbitration enforcement or indef, but close enough to use EC to stop this temporarily. Courcelles (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: you do not need protection until 2024 to prevent article graffiti that hasnt happened for a long time 67.204.150.79 (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Protection expired 6 weeks ago. Favonian (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i meant to post genshin impact sorry i'll fix it 67.204.150.79 (talk) 08:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the 500/30 ECP of the Arab–Israeli conflict. Loksmythe (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged at NEWBLPBAN, not that it matters. Courcelles (talk) 15:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 18:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Three previous protections may make it worth considering protecting the page for a longer period, as vandalism has persistently continued. TylerBurden (talk) 19:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: article graffiti has not happened for a long time so 2024 protection is bad 67.204.150.79 (talk) 08:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: edit war. The Banner talk 16:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you meant by "edit war" here. The last edit was more than a week ago, and the other user Bkonrad chose to initialize a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Should the section on Incomplete Disambiguation be deprecated or revised?. If WP:INCOMPDAB ends up being revised and requires these incomplete dab to be merged (which should include the other similar pages, created long ago and not just applied to this case), then I'm more than happy to follow that. BUT currently there's no rule enforcing this, so asking for a full protection seems to be inappropriate and rather subjective. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have restored your preferred version four times in the last ten days. That is called a slow burning edit war. I see no attempt to discuss the case but do see personal attacks. The Banner talk 16:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No attempt to discuss the case huh? Well, then I'm not sure who is NOT assuming good faiths here then [105]. Btw if you classify words such as "subjective" or "inappropriate" as personal attacks or "no good faith" then I guess I'm personal attacking everyone I'm working with. Not sure if this is my personal feelings, but the act of this itself made me feel disrespected. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I admit that I misread your comments, so I struck it. I have seen that you already removed my warning, so that point is solved. But no discussion refers to Talk:North–South Expressway (Vietnam) and Talk:North–South Expressway that are still empty. But I will leave it at that. The Banner talk 18:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let's make things clear here. After the first time I created that dab, two people interacted with it, Bkonrad and Wikishovel. However, only Bkonrad insisted on restoring the redirect, Wikishovel did not. Had there been a second person restoring the redirect at that time, I would have stopped recreating the dab (I'm looking at real numbers here, it's a 1:1). I then checked the policy at WP:INCOMPDAB and found that the current policy does not have any restrictions on these so-called incomplete disambiguations, and in fact like the examples I gave, pages like Green Line (London), Orange Line (New York), and Long Lake (New York), the one I created is no different from these so why forbidding it? Bkonrad also agreed on this that's why he/she stopped the redirect restoration and started the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Should the section on Incomplete Disambiguation be deprecated or revised and pinged me there. Therefore, right now the only meaningful discussion is that broad one in the project talk page, and discussing in the local talk page is useless. I also participated in that discussion so I believe that I have done my part. Additionally, I think there's currently no strict policy enforcing the discussion of a specific page to be on its local talk page. In fact, several discussions about pages take place in the project talk page and no one seemed to have complained about that. If there's anyone I'm edit warring with, that is Bkonrad but he/she chose to stop the restoration to seek for consensus on WP:INCOMPDAB. So I don't see the point of you, after 10 days, suddenly appear to trigger this unnecessary dispute. Like I mentioned, if WP:INCOMPDAB ends up being revised and requires the merging of these pages, I am more than happy to follow those guidelines. The whole story is, the dispute between me and Bkonrad ended 10 days ago, and until then I only did two restorations. So including the most recent one, that's three in total, not four (please don't miscount). Đại Việt quốc (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Insofar, that I noticed templates with links to disambiguation pages, due to your change, and I fixed those. And today I found that there are more pages with links. Seeing the prior episode and the total lack of discussion on the article talk page, I reverted. Followed by your revert etc. The discussion over incomplete dabpages is IMHO not relevant for this article. The Banner talk 00:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The initial comment of Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Should the section on Incomplete Disambiguation be deprecated or revised goes: "The existence of so many listings in Category:Disambiguation pages with (qualified) titles suggests the guidance at WP:Incomplete disambiguation has apparently become outdated. I suggest we either need to clarify that section to explain why so many anomalies exist or perhaps re-invigorate Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Incomplete disambiguations. Granted, some of the entries in that category may be entirely valid. But I just picked one at random Arteaga (footballer) where the disambiguation page Arteaga also exists. And I came upon this based on a comment by Đại Việt quốc in an edit summary] for North–South Expressway (Vietnam) pointing out the existence of Green Line (London), Orange Line (New York), and Long Lake (New York)." This article is exactly how user Bkonrad started the section, so you tell me if it is relevant or not. Since he/she linked this article there, at least 6 other people currently participating in the discussion saw the article, but no one complained nor took any action such as revert or requesting a protection, so what you are doing here seems to be very misfitting, IMHO. I will stop the conversation here, since it seems pointless by now, and let the others decide. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 01:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Banner, I'm not sure why you reverted the page for edit warring for reason. Because Đại Việt quốc is native Vietnamese on Vietnamese Wikipedia. They are just start to create a Vietnamese page. Bonthefox3 (talk) 11:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Judging by the exchange above page protection is not the way to go here. If it is an edit war at all, it's a rather slow one. Seems more like users disagreeing about the usefulness of a certain type of page. Pray continue discussion without too much sniping. Lectonar (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip and account vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: IPC.  🇮🇱JayCubby🇮🇱  talk 17:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Addition of anachronistic information. Kansas Bear (talk) 18:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations by IP and non-autoconfirmed users (e.g. [106]), there's been a recent near tenfold spike in views [107] so there is likely to be more disruptive editing in the forseeable future. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by IPs and new users. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Davest3r08 (^_^) (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (93*IP specifically). Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 23:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CTOP article related to Arab–Israeli conflict. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 15:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Loksmythe (talk) 20:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently the person has died so there is large number of edits been made with very less number of moderation. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, I only see a large number of seemingly good edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many recent IP edits over the past few months have been asserting that networks such as FX Movie Channel and Freeform are "sister networks" of Telemundo despite those networks not being owned by NBCUniversal, and also asserts that the children's programming blocks for NBC and Telemundo itself are somehow separate "sister networks" themselves. WCQuidditch 06:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP block evasion restoring Iptesh Kumar Meher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) edits. Belbury (talk) 08:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Red Jay (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – addition of unsourced content by a LTA. M.Bitton (talk) 14:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. IPs went right back to doing the same stuff as soon as the protection expired. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 21:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. for eight months. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing by both Ip's and registered users, so much childish vandalism, pending changes doesn't seem to be working. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 22:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Removal of sources (by a person who used IPs and sock puppets) that states that Brazil had provided funding by sending planes. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs blatantly adding unsourced information and ignoring hidden note about voice cast. LancedSoul (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP disruption. Dinoz1 (chat?) (he/him) 22:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from vandalism only accounts. PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Widr. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. •Cyberwolf•talk? 20:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 16:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Doesn't seem necessary at the moment. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Drmies. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users and addition of unsourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent spam target by anons. Request semi protection. oknazevad (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. EggRoll97 (talk) 05:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protected:

Persistent spamming by IPs. Fragrant Peony (talk) 02:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users Gend07000 (talk) 03:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP user keeps readding unsourced material without replying to talk page comments or using edit summaries. glman (talk) 03:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 152.36.1.8 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Edit warring. —Panamitsu (talk) 03:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:800C:6F0:1390:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 07:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Consistent edit-warring regarding inclusion of RFK Jr. in infobox. Everytime I check the article it has changed. Iamreallygoodatcheckers talk 05:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Full protection is an extreme measure for a highly-accessed article merely to arrest the appearance and reappearance of a section of the infobox currently being debated. Instances of 3RR violations can be reported. Chetsford (talk) 07:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Community sanctions enforcement. Two users WP: DreamRimmer and Re Packer&Tracker are removing sourced content from the page Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty I am requesting an increase in protection for this page according to the WP:GSCASTE sanctions for Caste, Tribe, Clan and history related articles of south Asian communities if the criteria are met because two users may be Rajput and are removing well-sourced content and pushing their own caste-based point of view and attempting to depict or claim that Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty was a Rajput dynasty even though all modern historians agree that the Rajput community is a group of cluster of castes and communities tha formed in the 12th or 13th century even after the Fall of the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty. These claim all began when British colonial era historians, including James Tod, incorrectly referred to all ancient ruling families as Rajput. He also incorrectly referred to the entire Gurjar ethnic group, Jat ethnic group, and Ahir ethnic group as Rajput without any root sources; these are all district ethnic groups in South Asia even today. I strongly support the Administrators' intervention in resolving this issue because the Gurjar Pratihar or Gurjara Pratihara dynasty belonged to the Pratihara clan of the Gurjar community of India and Pakistan. I am including some reliable sources that for examine that support the claim that the Gurjara Pratihara dynasty belonged only to the Gurjar community.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] [10] [11][12][13][14]

  1. ^ Nijjar, Bakhshish Singh (2008). Origins and History of Jats and Other Allied Nomadic Tribes of India: 900 B.C.-1947 A.D. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 218. ISBN 978-81-269-0908-7. The Gujjars founded a group of dynasties that controlled areas of Rajasthan, Central India, and Gujarat from 7th to 11th century A.D. The most powerful branch of the Gujjars was the Pratihara, whose power was centered in the Jodhpur region of Rajasthan. The Pratiharas contended with the Rashtrakuta of the Deccan and the Palas of Bengal for imperial hegemony during the 9th century and controlled the great cities of Kanauj and Ujjain. The greatest Pratihara ruler was Bhoja I, reigned about 836-882 A.D., whose wealth and military might greatly impressed the Arabs.
  2. ^ Sarban, Singh (2001). Haryana State Gazetteer. Haryana Gazetteers Organisation, Revenue Department. p. 511. Gujjars (Gujrara-Pratiharas) were once the rulers of this country. The story goes like this, "After the dissolution of Harsha's empire, Haryana continued to flourish The Pratihara empire was followed by the Tomar ruler's son of whom, Anangpala founded the city of Delhi. Haryana formed a part of his empire.
  3. ^ Hāṇḍā, Omacanda (2001). Temple Architecture of the Western Himalaya: Wooden Temples. Indus Publishing. p. 27. ISBN 978-81-7387-115-3. During the middle of 7th century, one of the Gurjjara clans, the Pratiharas emerged dominant, followed by Parmars and Chauhans, and the imperial Pratihara-Gurjjaras of Kanauj around the middle of 8th century. In the mid 9th century, the Gurjjaras rose to the imperial heights in the north and western India under their patriarch Bhoja I. However, after his demise, the empire could not be held together for long. His son Mahendrapala-I could maintain his father's empire. He is known to have enlarged it towards the east, and his son Mahipala extended the realm deeper in the Western Himalayan interiors. The Imperial Gurjjaras ruled uninterruptedly for about four centuries since their rise in the 6th century, until Kanauj fell under the attack of Mahmud of Ghazni. During that period, not only they held their realm together, but also buttressed it up against the foreign attacks and aggressions.
  4. ^ Nijjar, Bakhshish Singh (2008). Origins and History of Jats and Other Allied Nomadic Tribes of India: 900 B.C.-1947 A.D. Atlantic Publishers & Dist. p. 218. ISBN 978-81-269-0908-7. The Gujjars founded a group of dynasties that controlled areas of Rajasthan, Central India, and Gujarat from 7th to 11th century A.D. The most powerful branch of the Gujjars was the Pratihara, whose power was centered in the Jodhpur region of Rajasthan. The Pratiharas contended with the Rashtrakuta of the Deccan and the Palas of Bengal for imperial hegemony during the 9th century and controlled the great cities of Kanauj and Ujjain. The greatest Pratihara ruler was Bhoja I, reigned about 836-882 A.D., whose wealth and military might greatly impressed the Arabs.
  5. ^ Sarban, Singh (2001). Haryana State Gazetteer. Haryana Gazetteers Organisation, Revenue Department. p. 511. Gujjars (Gujrara-Pratiharas) were once the rulers of this country. The story goes like this, "After the dissolution of Harsha's empire, Haryana continued to flourish The Pratihara empire was followed by the Tomar ruler's son of whom, Anangpala founded the city of Delhi. Haryana formed a part of his empire.
  6. ^ Sarban, Singh (2001). Haryana State Gazetteer. Haryana Gazetteers Organisation, Revenue Department. p. 511. Gujjars (Gujrara-Pratiharas) were once the rulers of this country. The story goes like this, "After the dissolution of Harsha's empire, Haryana continued to flourish The Pratihara empire was followed by the Tomar ruler's son of whom, Anangpala founded the city of Delhi. Haryana formed a part of his empire.
  7. ^ Ph.D, M. Jankiraman (2020-11-03). Perspectives in Indian History: From the Origins to AD 1857. Notion Press. ISBN 978-1-64983-995-4.
  8. ^ Rawat, Ajay Singh (1998). Forests on Fire: Ecology and Politics in the Himalayan Tarai. Cosmo Publications. p. 75. ISBN 978-81-7020-840-2. One Gujjar Kingdom is mentioned in the fifth century A.D. It was in Rajasthan , with Bhimal or Srimal as its capital . The Gujjar Pratihara King of Bhimal later conquered Kannauj and became the paramount power in Northern India.
  9. ^ Warikoo, Kulbhushan; Som, Sujit (2000). Gujjars of Jammu and Kashmir. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Manav Sangrahalaya. p. 5.
  10. ^ Sharma, Kamal Prashad; Sethi, Surinder Mohan (1997). Costumes and Ornaments of Chamba. Indus Publishing. ISBN 978-81-7387-067-5.
  11. ^ A Comprehensive History of India: pt. 1-2. A.D. 300-985. Orient Longmans. 1981. In Kanauj the family of a ruler in this region , it has been inferred that the Pratihāras formed a clan of the Gurjara tribe . It has accordingly been held by many scholars that Harichandra was a member of the Pratihara clan of the Gurjara (Gujar) tribe.
  12. ^ Rawat, Ajay Singh (1993). Man and Forests: The Khatta and Gujjar Settlements of Sub-Himalayan Tarai. Indus Publishing. p. 106. ISBN 978-81-85182-97-1. The earliest reference of a separate Gujjar kingdom is men- tioned in the 5th century A.D. It was in Rajasthan, with Bhilmal or Srimal as its capital. The Gujjar Pratihara kings of Bhilmal later conquered Kannauj and became the paramount power in northern India. From Bhilmal, they also made inroads into Gujarat and established the minor kingdom of Bharoach or Baroach. The eminent king Raja Bhoj and other kings of Kannauj dynasty, who ruled in the 9th, 10th and 11th centuries were all Gujjars.
  13. ^ Sabha, India Parliament Lok (2006). Parliamentary Debates: Official Report. Lok Sabha Secretariat. p. 331.
  14. ^ Shah, Popatlal Govindlal (1958). The Dublas of Gujarat. Bharatiya Adimjati Sevak Sangh. p. 5. The word Gurjardesh was applied to this area also from the contact with Kanauj Kings . The dominions of Gurjar- pratihar kings extended from Gujarat to Kanauj and the country previously known as Lata and Anarta , came to ...

Fancy vißes (call) 07:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Request made by a sockpuppet. In any case, we do not apply indefinite full protection to articles. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Once again, looking at the history, there is too much disruption on the article from time to time. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 08:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following protection of Liz McDonald the vandalism has now moved on to the actress. Knitsey (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Stwalkerster. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of childish vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 16:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruption by Special:Contributions/140.123.0.0/16. May contain sock puppet(Special:Contributions/Cloud3455 Special:Contributions/Ginlom) issues. Rastinition (talk) 14:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rastinition and LHD are Vandalism. According to the school's website , National Sun Yat-sen University was founded in 1980. [1]
“National Sun Yat-sen University (NSYSU) is a public university established in Kaohsiung in 1980 to balance educational development and resources between northern and southern Taiwan. Before its inception, most well-established universities were concentrated in the north. Named in honor of Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the founder of the Republic of China, the University chose Dr. Sun's birthday, November 12th, as its anniversary.”
https://www.nsysu.edu.tw/p/412-1000-1497.php?Lang=en 140.123.173.1 (talk) 17:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.  Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar issue is cropping up here as what was happening on Category:Israelites[108] IP keeps blanking the page because the category membership is small Special:Contributions/92.3.179.139. Mason (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of BLP violations by IPs, appears to be coordinated at Reddit judging by talk page comments Grandmaster 16:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) 17:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For the last month IP editors have been making subtle changes to the article to make the text reflect proponents of the technique rather than the medical sources cited in the page. At least one IP editor [72.89.19.118 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)] is making the baseless claim that the many different users reverting these changes are all being paid/instructed by Susan Gerbic (User:Sgerbic), so talk page discussions have been ineffectual. Rjjiii (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/CAM. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for tagging me. I was unaware of the conversation until yesterday when Louie told me on my talk page! Trust me, if I had that kind of power to control you all I wouldn't be fussing with AT. Sgerbic (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One or more (likely one) person dancing across IPs over the last many weeks keeps asserting the subject was not in a relationship with the person they attacked. Despite multiple warnings across IPs, they've never provided a source to support their assertion. Sources do exist and are in the article supporting the opposite. Requesting semi-protection for a while. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is a transcluded template for Israel/Palestine, and transcluded on highly trafficked pages. None ECP users shouldn't be able to bypass editing. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 19:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – reoccurring meatpuppet/sockpuppet vandalism related to a social media post. Likely not to go away in the near future, given its been repeatedly reoccuring within a day of it being unprotected. DarmaniLink (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per WP:CT/A-I and WP:EW. Plus quantity of page views. 201.66.13.22 (talk) 18:14, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent subtle vandalism. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (he|she|they) 18:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12 November 2023

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Can we semi this till I look into copyright problem ...Not sure if we have copy pasting from an unnamed source added...if its new/old or simply a mirror/fork

https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=National_Museum_of_Iran&url=. Moxy- 13:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:HOAX and ip socks. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same person, multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... @Chetsford: has since extended-confirmed protected the page. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalising the Reality Television shows information based on personal wishes by fans of contestants and rumors without any authentic news article citation. It affects the reliability of the show's public image in this social forum by few masked fake fans of few specific contestants in this game. Yugendar bcom (talk) 08:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Duplicate extant article. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 15:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 21:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Saskasascdgsw (talk · contribs). indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article sees constant addition of unsourced content, that appears malicious and politically motivated. None of these editors participate in any discussions about the content. Pedantic Aristotle (talk) 12:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not much seems currently to have been discussed on the talk page. 21:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High profile BLP, recurring vandal and tendentious edit target. Slowking Man (talk) 18:05, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. put CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 00:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by IP editor (same geolocation; likely the same editor). Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection just expired; multi-IP vandal who prompted the protection is immediately back. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring from IP range which has admitted on the talk page to being associated with the article subject. MrOllie (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Following protection of Beverley Callard and Liz McDonald they have moved on to vandalising this article. Knitsey (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. Eyesnore talk💬 01:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of IP-switching vandal. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Koshchki123 (she/they) (talk) 00:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, and harassment by IP hopping vandal Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. 64andtim (talk to me) 01:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GeneralNotability. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism resumed as soon as it got unprotected. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Has a history of persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive recreation of the article. Davest3r08 (^_^) (talk) 18:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 00:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – there currently seems to be an extremely incivil headache of a content dispute, and protection will hopefully encourage dispute resolution. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 20:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) EDIT: also revert to last stable version by WikiCleanerBot. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 20:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined It seems from the talk page that the editors have resolved things. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent, unsourced changes being made by IP editor(s). ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I probably should have used the "BLP vio" tag here as some edits relate to the subjects' living children ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editor (multiple IPs; same geolocation). User:Drmies, I believe this is the same editor you handed a one-month block to earlier this week. Same pattern, same addition of unsourced fancruft, same edit summaries, etc. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 80.142.0.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. for 3 months. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. There is vandalism from the User:FMSky and User:188.191.225.122, they try to change the word "militant" to "terrorist" while the cited source gives no mention of "terrorist", only "militant", so there is an edit war. A protection on 7 days should be enough. Maxim Masiutin (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined FMSky self-reverted. 05:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. MrFlyingPies23(✍) 00:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: anonymous IP keeps trying to close the AfD BBQboffingrill me 05:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic on Israeli/Palestine and transcluded on high traffic pages, can you ensure only ECP editors are able to edit this? I moved this snippet to a proper template now, so re-requesting protection ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 00:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently protected as far as I can see. Ymblanter (talk) 08:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the 500/30 ECP of the Arab–Israeli conflict. Loksmythe (talk) 00:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, and harassment from serial IP hopper Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of this vandalism is due to a recent event, but overall, as a prominent subject, this article has seen a general trend in higher levels of vandalism recently. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistend disruptions, edit-warring and personal attack on an edis summary. Jingiby (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 08:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced or poorly-sourced content which reads promotional. Removal of CoI template. Tacyarg (talk) 09:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mann Mann (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely., logged under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Professional wrestling. Courcelles (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mann Mann (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Professional wrestling. Courcelles (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address vandalism. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁=☁=✈) 13:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article linked on the main page being persistently vandalised by IP editors. Happily888 (talk) 13:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mainly ip vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 13:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Please senior admins see this matter recover my page Pratihara because Someone deleted all of the content from my page and redirect it to wrong place 1 this was my first history-related page that I made for a tribe or clan, falsely claiming that it was produced by a ban User:Anuj Choudhary Ror. However, this assertion is false because there are no connected pages for such block users in his article history.2 I would want to request that you save my page, correct his incorrect claim, and use a protective template to safeguard my page. And my page was also disrupted before this. 3. O chawal (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing amount of Vandalism, should be semi-protected. Sev6nWiki (talk) 10:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No recent vandalism Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:07, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Launchballer 15:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Harassment 2601:246:C000:3FF0:7EF7:8A5D:17C9:A11B (talk) 15:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C000:3FF0:7EF7:8A5D:17C9:A11B (talk) 14:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Number 57. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:22, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Temporary semi-protection did not work before, IPs started vandalism again after expiration. AKFkrewfamKF1 (talk) 17:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite would be too much, but it can always be reprotected if the issue continues after this period. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Israeli company, persistent vandalism relating Israel-Palestine - proposing ECP per WP:A/I/PIA guidelines. GnocchiFan (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please do submit a new request if semi-protection doesn't do the trick, feel free to ping me. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. SatDis (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 14:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Vandalized every few days by an anon bouncing from IP address to IP address. Clearly the same person, since no one has touched this uncommon redirect since 3 December 2022‎ otherwise, but they're not effectively blockable since their IP address ranges vary widely. This could have long-term SP, since there is no reason for any anon to change it: as with something like "WP:NPOV" or "MOS:CAPS", the target of the redir and the rcats that apply to it are unlikely to change any time in the forseeable future.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  19:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protectedFavonian (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 15:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Shelesh is the subject of various controversies. Most recently YouTuber Azzyland accused her of stealing her style, but no reliable source has written about this (yet). Naturally an IP editor added it to the article anyway and got reverted. There has been only one good contribution from an IP editor: SSSniperWolf (Diff ~1184236508). All the other IP edits have been reverted. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism, and highly viewed page. Razorback250 (talk) 18:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs have been jostling around city names for over a month. Nswix (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multi-IP vandal, the same one targeting Ryan Blaney. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replace Government with Herrenvolk Democracy or something related to apartheid as both the UN and Amnesty international, Very Reliable sources, have deemed israel an apartheid state. Gorgonopsi (talk) 19:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case then finding sources for such an explosive claim in an ethnopolitical contentious topic should be easy since this is a VERY explosive claim that reliable sources would be on immediately. Until you provide those sources, this request will go absolutely nowhere, regardless of where you make it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 07:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – You initialted a discussion on the article talk page, and that's where the decision will be made. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13 November 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Regular and long term morphing IP vandalism. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a00:23c6:3f82:f901::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after protections expired today. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent sockpuppetry from editor trying to go around consensus regarding the addition of a "cult following" section. Panian513 20:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:15, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Mobile editor, constantly making useless changes & being quite rude (on their talkpage) about it. GoodDay (talk) 21:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has now returned as an IP & is continuing to make the same useless changes. GoodDay (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP has now (I've since removed their message from my talkpage), promised to continue to edit war, to no end. GoodDay (talk) 00:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've semi-protected the page because the IP is edit warring from a moving IP (for a week) but you really should add a discussion to the talk page since this is not obvious vandalism. RegentsPark (comment) 00:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow, I'm not certain a discussion on the topic with the individual, would be helpful. They've shown (via their comments) what appears to be contempt, toward having their changes reverted. GoodDay (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Just thought we should be proactive on a very important page Oneequalsequalsone (talk) 23:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined, no history of vandalism GFOLEY FOUR!23:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of disruptive editing from new users & IPs. Hatman31 (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.RegentsPark (comment) 00:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits since September by variable IP to lead inconsistent with MOS:BIOFIRSTSENTENCE. Reywas92Talk 19:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Range 2600:100f:b000::/40 blocked for 2 years. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Isabelle Belato a different IP just did the same after your revert. Thanks. Reywas92Talk 05:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by football fans TCiconha (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Does this page fall under arbitration enforcement for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Thought I would report just in case it is. Gunnarball (talk) 02:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – OP blocked as a sock of LTA. Favonian (talk) 06:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection IP edits presumed socks of blocked user JonathanFraezo Dl2000 (talk) 21:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism on a daily basis. SKAG123 (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism and dubious edits. Ghdfghmp (talk) 05:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined You only have one opponent, the opponent is extended confirmed, and you should be able to sort your differences out at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by TheAnaheimDude. Walt Yoder (talk) 00:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User partially blocked from the article. If they continue with this behavior, consider reporting at WP:ANI. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism Emanormanny (talk) 10:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page is already semi-protected indefinitely and I don't see the need to upgrade to ECP. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism CoconutOctopus talk 12:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! CoconutOctopus talk 12:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption. Novemberjazz 01:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Novemberjazz, in the future, consider warning the editor and then report them to ANI/AIV. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – social media comments section persistently removed. Karst (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Covers a contentious topic (Israel-Palestine) and, as such, is prone to vandalism, as it happened today. 200.219.135.13 (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Israel-Palestinian conflict. •Cyberwolf•talk? 13:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered IPs are often adding unsourced material or material that violates BLP content policies. Spinster300 (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP vandalism by various editors over the past dozen days.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 16:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 21:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a PIA article, and at this point is not a likely attack target (though this could change of course). I would decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Very flimsy connection to PIA if at all, disruption not very high. Lectonar (talk) 14:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since page protection expired for this subject (who was reported in September 2023 to be the target of a "cyber attack" for misrepresented comments about Hinduism) there has been ongoing disruptive editing by IP editors. Beccaynr (talk) 09:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend against this request. User:Beccaynr is totally falsifying the comments of the subject by misrepresenting her comments from "September 2023" with those she said in 2019 per the cited source. Page does NOT need protection, instead Beccaynr should be reprimanded for his disruption. 2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk) 10:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IP, you were warned about edit warring and the three-revert rule [109] at 09:21, 13 November 2023, and continued to revert, after I explained my objection on my user talk page and asked you to discuss this on the article talk page several times. You have made more than three reverts [110] (09:17, 13 November 2023‎), [111] (09:20, 13 November 2023), [112] (09:49, 13 November 2023), [113] (10:16, 13 November 2023) to restore what two editors, including myself, have said is unsourced content, and I said is contentious content that appears to be contrary to WP:BLP policy. I have since also opened a section on the article talk page. From my view, this article has had a fair amount of disruption related to misrepresented sources over time and I am concerned about the September 2023 context as an ongoing risk of disruption to this article. Beccaynr (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See also Philosopher Divya Dwivedi Among Latest Targets of India’s Right Wing (Protean Magazine, October 2023) - includes discussion of the 2019 controversy the IP has been referring to as a source for what appears to be original research - this apparently is an ongoing issue for the subject of the article. Beccaynr (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you should be reprimanded for the edit war you have carried out. It was completely useless!
You don't have to be "concerned about the September 2023 context as an ongoing risk of disruption to this article" whenever someone makes a new edit to this article.
Just because you have seen some other editors adding poor content to this page before, it still does not mean that you get the right to impose your WP:OWNERSHIP on this page. 12:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I am asking for administrator help because this article is within two CTOP areas and was previously protected in September 2023. From my view, the persistent addition of unsourced contentious content, over BLP policy objections, is part of the ongoing disruptive editing that has continued since the page protection expired. Beccaynr (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Then you are clearly talking about a different article. 2402:A00:401:7C3E:4D11:C044:1AD5:F1BC (talk) 13:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Seems rather self evident by this exchange. Lectonar (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since I had started here, I wasn't sure if AN3 was necessary, and I was thinking page protection was the gentlest dispute resolution to encourage talk page discussion. Beccaynr (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't like to cut off one side only from discussion by a protection which affects only them, and I rarely have seen that protection gets people to the talk page. It's either full protection, or more direct intervention, like noticeboards. Lectonar (talk) 14:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits from blocked sockpuppet IPs. Pinging User:Drmies. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Telephone number is protected, or I would have made the request there.

Please change the phrase Tommy Tutone's hit song "867-5309/Jenny" (1981) to Tommy Tutone's 1981 hit song "867-5309/Jenny". When content can be embedded in the middle of a phrase, that's better than putting it in parentheses. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 00:29, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done with this edit. Favonian (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is attracting purposeful vandalizing from time to time, where someone or someones are changing people's names, changing people's ages, adding uncited ages, plus adding other bits of odd (but wrong) minutiae. I think the most-useful form of protection would be to add confirmed/auto-confirmed protection to this article. Shearonink (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 17:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 08:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of unconstructive edits by IPs (mostly block-evading sockpuppets) [114][115], edit warring [116] and sockpuppetry [117]. Skitash (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple anonymous users vandalizing/adding joke names of management positions. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 18:30, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 17:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. Favonian (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pretty much all IP edits in the last few years are POV pushing. Delaunay is now designated as French artist, which is how reliable sources outside of Russia and Ukraine describe her. However, we constantly have Ukrainian POV pushers, which change this to Ukrainian artist, and Russian POV pushers who change it to Russian-French artist. The topic has been designated as contentious by ArbCom, and we also have WP:RUSUKR prohibiting such edits to non extended confirmed users. Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged under WP:RUSUKR. Favonian (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temperory Semi-Protection: High level of IP vandalism and vandalism by new ids again and again as soon as the previous protection expired. Imsaneikigai (talk) 11:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. – Favonian (talk) 16:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content to the infobox by various IPs. Skitash (talk) 19:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts by IP-hopping editor to prematurely close this AFD. MrOllie (talk) 17:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the length of time it should still be open. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are back with their unsourced stuff. Make it longer this time. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 20:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary ECP for edit warring and POV pushing. WP:CT/IPA applies here. Horserice (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; I have also duly added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Although a new page - already ,high levels of disruptive edits as well as IP vandalism/ disruptive edits has just started. ToosieJoosie (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lightoil (talk) 21:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:53, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – I don't know the correct duration to request. Maybe a range block is a better option. Onorem (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:55, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that in the part about the Denmark in Minecraft project, the wording be changed to "the limit in default Minecraft was around 192 metres (630 ft) above in-game sea level at the time of building" to reflect recent changes to build height limits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.40.38.41 (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I have made the requested edit, with a minor modification - check and see if it looks good.
In the future, I would recommend putting any requests on the talk page, as those are arguably more closely watched. Minecraft is actually in my watchlist, so I get a notification when, among other things, someone requests an edit. Also, given that the article is semi-protected, you can create an account and, after four days and ten edits on other articles, make edits yourself, provided they are constructive.
Have a nice day! Thank you for your contribution! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2023

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: User request within own user space. •Cyberwolf•talk? 15:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent vandalism has increased and there is a social media account @dolloppodcast on instagram that is promoting further vandalism. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting protection period of 1 month - thank you! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Scaled the request down a bit, but please feel free to list again if the disruption continues after semi-protection expires. bibliomaniac15 22:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Bibliomaniac15! JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 02:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since protection expired, article has been edited by IPs with vandalism and attempting to add non-existent parameters to infobox about a relationship not yet confirmed by Kelce or his rumored girlfriend Taylor Swift. Rockchalk717 22:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. bibliomaniac15 22:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism in the last days. It results in them adding by copy/paste a lot of protected material to WP and forcing WP admins to mask their modifs, thus making everyone lose time. AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized I was in the wrong place. Sorry for that really :( AgisdeSparte (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor per above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: involves a person currently in the news, alarming number of back and forth changes. 00jelwes (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for now. If things turn ugly, the mop will be swung. Favonian (talk) 20:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is too restrictive. There are experts in the field that cannot edit the page. How is it possible for a free encyclopedia that this is the case? GiordanoB (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the indefinite protection was due to constant back-and-forths with protection in the first place (including an attempt with CRASHlock which had to be abandoned in favour of semi-protection), the fact that the article's been edited very actively this year, and the talk page not being protected, you're going to need to come up with a different appeal than "but muh freedumz" to get this lifted. Indefinite semi-protections as an escalation from previous protections is par for the course, and the likelihood the vandalism would just recur (since the Solar System tends to be taught in elementary schools) is going to be higher than usual. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP making the same edits over and over on multiple pages (including the Historicity of Jesus page) using different IPs. See [118], [119], and [120]. I also gave them a edit war warning on their talk. [121] Ramos1990 (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After further review of the edit history, it seems like this is an edit war and the page has been protected. Please make use of the article talk page to discuss or make use of available dispute resolution options. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP making the same edits over and over on multiple pages (including the Historical Jesus page) using different IPs. See [122], [123], and [124]. I also gave them a edit war warning on their talk [125]. Ramos1990 (talk) 22:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After further review of the edit history, it seems like this is an edit war and the page has been protected. Please make use of the article talk page to discuss or make use of available dispute resolution options. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi-constant persistent disruptive editing from an IP user. Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 02:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 02:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:47, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBEE enforcement requested. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 188.73.232.0/22 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Will put CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: By WP:ARBPIA4 as direct spillover (plus I just had to revert someone adding Nazi content to the page) ChaotıċEnby(talk) 23:25, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the record this was declined before as not falling into that category. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My bad, didn't see it. ChaotıċEnby(talk) 00:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 02:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant long term ongoing sockpuppetry at this page and related Ellie Moon. Valereee (talk) 01:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current protection (pending changes) does not appear to be sufficient in containing constant vandalism of this page. Aydoh8 (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. There's only been one edit in 47 days. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – New target of Kingshowman. JavaHurricane 08:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits from blocked sockpuppet accounts. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add: Loai Noufi - Palestinian Christian actor (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loai_Nofi) to Notable Palestinian Christians list. 2601:645:8781:2120:BD01:CE88:AF63:49 (talk) 08:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Palestinian Christians is not protected. Favonian (talk) 08:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:CT/A-I. ~~2NumForIce (speak|edits) 03:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated overwriting of redirect to uncited stub. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 19:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Kingshowman target. JavaHurricane 15:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. Favonian (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Too many edits to undo that are incorrect, despite us saying they are incorrect. Also vandalism. YoloMc8562 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And repeated edits from IPs. YoloMc8562 (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.} Daniel Case (talk) 22:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please put this article under extended confirmed protection due to recent repeated edits by IPs falling under the scope of WP:ARBPIA4. Cheers, Number 57 12:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range keeps edit warring to restore their POV version despite requests to gain WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page per WP:BRD [[126] [127] [128] [129]]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spamming and probable socking. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Per AfD. The film is unlikely to release in 2024. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. An article with that exact title has been created/deleted only once, and it was initially at Thug Life (2024 Indian Film) which was similarly only created once. If it's been repeatedly recreated it hasn't been at that title, so salting it doesn't appear warranted. Aoidh (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to announcement of new official rivalry name. glman (talk) 14:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Breaking my usual indifference to the subjects of the articles reported here and the reason for the protection to offer my opinion that, if a sports rivalry needs an official name, it probably isn't a real rivalry. They should really have stuck with the unofficial name; it's more on point). Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of unsourced additions by IP users and paid editors. glman (talk) 14:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator BusterD. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors making unsourced/unsupported edits, no discussion despite reverts and warnings. Ravensfire (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: ips constantly try to remove his organized crime links Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 19:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pacitti's page is being vanadalised after it was mentioned in an online stream. Bored0stiff (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent pattern of disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2023

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Is-Pal conflict.  🇮🇱JayCubby🇮🇱  talk 15:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Kingshowman abuse spilling over from AfD. JavaHurricane 15:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. That should last through the rest of the AfD. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rash of recent IP vandalism. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:20, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 16:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 17:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Apparently something to do with Twitter but I can't take likening him to George Floyd and saying he was on fentanyl in good faith. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent removal of content by an IP, reverted by multiple users. Polyamorph (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 23:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same reason it was protected a while ago, repeated addition of unsourced/speculative cruft by IPs. Requesting the PP to be a bit longer this time as the edits are driven by a recent film release (two months should be fine). Gotitbro (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:44, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits both by IP's and registered users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. PCP is off as there's no point to keeping it when the article is semi'ed. Daniel Case (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: per WP:ARBPIA, since it technically is spillover from the Israel-hamas war. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 22:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And, once again, logged. Daniel Case (talk) 23:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Last month's protection has expired and disruptive IP editors are back. Dan Bloch (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same reason as before but the player has officially joined Bayern Munich and protection could avoid vandalism. JC Kotisow (talk) 10:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Misuse article as news propagation according WP:NOTNEWS. ZH8000 (talk) 12:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Palestinian Israeli conflict. •Cyberwolf•talk? 13:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive edit since April? Please re-read the protection policy. BusterD (talk) 22:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And to add another reason not to protect, just how is this, 750 or so years later, relevant to the current situation in any way? Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism from people looking to make a statement on Israel/Palestine, similar to the 2023 MTV EMAs page Pdhadam (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 22:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A shifting IP user keeps highlighting in the lead a minor voice-over role once held by this actor as though it were his magnum opus and others keep reverting it. Largoplazo (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same type of disruptive, POV edits commenced immetiately after page protection expired . This -> [130] on such edits before the pp, and this -> [131] today. IP range is also the same, possibly the same person. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article is also currently PCP'ed for most of the next year. Daniel Case (talk) 23:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The article is on the brink of an editwar, so a few days protection can help to calm down emotions. Issue is based on POV. The Banner talk 19:11, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Discussion seems to be flowing in the talk page. I've added the article to my watchlist in case editwarring continues. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. •Cyberwolf•talk? 19:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The user's talk page access has been removed. Aoidh (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editor adding nonexistent airline/routes and removing sourced information. Needs full protection. Jz0610 (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. User partially blocked from the article. If issue continues when the block expires, report to ANI. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A few templates

Extended confirmed protection: An autoconfirmed user recently added a dick pic to these templates. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 01:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A bit of IP vandalism over the past few months, maybe semi? idk LOOKSQUARE (👤️·🗨️) talk 02:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: So no one can edit my page MinecraftPlayer321 (talk) 01:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:11, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: edit warring may happen. Dgtdddsx123 (talk) 02:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA related edit warring. Marokwitz (talk) 08:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 04:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and new users keeps disrupting the article. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 08:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Bridget Regan, Dave King's current wife keeps deleting his previous marriage for personal reasons even after it's been verified and the copyright of the image proven. User: 73.145.231.177 - Daveagusbridie Dave King (singer) Gina Cavalier (Author) married on 10/24/1998 in Las Vegas

King is married to musician and bandmate Bridget Regan. After years together, the two married in a private ceremony in Tokyo, Japan while on tour in 2008.[5] He was formerly married to Gina Cavalier in a ceremony at A Little White Wedding Chapel, in Las Vegas, Nevada, [6]on October 24, 1998, and divorced in 2005.[7] Gcavalier (talk) 16:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Jauerback.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Steady stream of disruptive edits since protections expired in 2021. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected, let us try pending changes first.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the section "Hostage negotiations" there is the orphaned (partial) sentence "centres on the release of hostages in exchange for a temporary ceasefire." This is clearly an error, since the section makes sense without this partial sentence, I suggest it is removed. AmbitiousAmphibian (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AmbitiousAmphibian:  Done and thanks for pointing that out! Edward-Woodrow (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding the so-called 480p HDTV (which supposed to be SDTV) and incorrect format pictures such as 4:3 720p to infoboxes. --LDM2003 talk to me! 10:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has continuously been reverted from its original content, once more after the page protection period ended. The responsible party remains an anonymous user. To prevent additional instances of vandalism and maintain the integrity of the information provided, Extended confirmed protection is highly necessary. Your kind consideration in this matter is greatly valued. Arthur Hirai (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have merely gone for longer protection than the previous one I imposed. ECP is not necessary when the offending editor is anonymous. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am writing to request page protection for this article due to persistent vandalism by an anonymous user utilizing multiple IP addresses.

While the initial IP address used by this user has been blocked, they continue to disrupt the article using various IPs.

I have previously provided the references in the reply section, and the source is reliable.

Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your commitment to Wikipedia’s quality and reliability. Arthur Hirai (talk) 15:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please see the talk page history. This is a page dedicated to keeping list of sockpuppets. They've returned with the same behaviour. – Callmemirela 🍁 15:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 16:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism since oct. Cassiopeia talk 01:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two IPs making three edits over a month is not enough disruption to warrant protection. Aoidh (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can we fully protect this page until there is consensus? There is an ongoing dispute regarding its official name. Beshogur (talk) 16:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. WP:ANEW can be used to report edit warring. Aoidh (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs, adding unsourced/bogus content in recent edits. Magitroopa (talk) 17:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A great deal of IP vandalism and insertion of low quality/opinionated content over the last 24 hours or so. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. By that time the story about him challenging the Teamsters' leader to a fight in the committee room will have blown over, replaced by some other outrage we'll have to protect an article over. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA; see [132] and [133] as examples on how this is within scope, broadly construed. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP address sockpuppetry. The person has repeatedly reverted edits on this template, more recently mine. I've explained the issue with this person's edits on two different talk pages of IP addresses as well as including a hidden note and explaining in my edit summary the issue. It's been from at least 3 different IP addresses but it's definitely the same person. Rockchalk717 05:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:40:C300:F150:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by LTA Lampung. 180.241.214.73 (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by LTA Lampung. 180.241.214.73 (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article has not been edited at all this month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by LTA Lampung. 180.241.214.73 (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP vandalism/disruptive editing, editing record to re-add LSU's vacated wins. glman (talk) 16:23, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:8807:4049:6D1F:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism by IP DiodeAdvocate (talk) 18:27, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 18:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent pattern of disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 18:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent removal of the same piece of sourced information by floating IPs. No discussion or edit summary ever provided. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same IP edit warring again on the same content, despite multiple editors including me telling them to not delete the section. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (On Vacation) 18:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Less Unless (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/disruptive editing history. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent history of nearly endless vandalism by both IP's and registered users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 21:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I see a lot of disagreement over a band member's name, and disagreement about "was" vs "were." I don't see vandalism, and I don't see any discussion on either issue on the talk page. Joyous! Noise! 00:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. D o o t e d . (talk) 23:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to. For the second edit, It was a mistake. And you only have 26 edits, so there's a little doubt about you 160.178.225.126 (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have a long history of *tagged* vandalism. D o o t e d . (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Joyous! Noise! 00:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A lot of IP vandalism in the past day or so, that involve some form of "Tyler Kolek is their daddy". — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Joyous! Noise! 02:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Continual level of vandalism from IP address 173.28.28.68. Have left note on users page but continual vandalism ensues. Request immediate lock on page and block on IP address. User also has vandalised other WP. KingdomNone91 (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. In future, if the disruption is caused by one IP, as here, it is better to report the problem at WP:AIV. Joyous! Noise! 02:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Regular vandalism by accounts with less than 10 edits. SKAG123 (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 06:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Extended confirmed protection is lo longer needed due to it being in place for the better part of this year. Razorback250 (talk) 21:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ping: Muboshgu. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Hopefully the situation is resolved. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... For the bot. Favonian (talk) 06:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Uptick in vandalism from multiple IP addresses. SounderBruce 20:49, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and serious BLP vios, multiple revision deletions of inappropriate content over the last few days. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:06, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am somewhat loath to protect articles at AfD, but here disruption has crossed a line. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Vandalism has occurred as soon as protection has expired, as to be expected. Users may wish to check some of the reverts too to make sure they have fully reverted vandalism and no inadvertent vandalism has slipped in. GnocchiFan (talk) 12:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Redirect is currently pending-changes protected, but I see no reason for what will almost certainly remain this exact redirect forever to be edited by IPs or non-autoconfirmed users. Tollens (talk) 05:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Afaics the redirect IS already semi-protected since 2018. Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: Semi-protected My bad, I looked at the wrong redirect. Lectonar (talk) 13:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: there is very important information that is missing from her wikipedia biography that needs to be added. Robby mercier (talk) 09:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – You already have two edit requests at Talk:Angela Goethals and that's where the matter will be decided. Favonian (talk) 09:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: I want to request this here also as I noticed that the protecting admin's last contribution was in October. I want to request that the page Ester Nurumi Tri Wardoyo be unprotected as after reviewing the current draft Draft:Ester Nurumi Tri Wardoyo, it now passes notability guidelines. Many thanks!. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are saying you have reviewed the draft and want to accept it, but you can't because of the protection, you can make a request in the admin section of WP:RM/TR; that is one of the purposes of that section. That said, I will go ahead and make the AFCH move. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected Lectonar (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA. While ultimately I think the page should be merged, I don’t have the right to express it, neither does any non 30/500 editor. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 00:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Joyous! Noise! 15:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This was semi-protected for a couple days by another admin. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator BusterD. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive birth date/death date changes. Waxworker (talk) 07:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 15:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A lot of vandalism, spamming, and just generally needs protection. Begocc (talk) 13:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 15:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: The Move was recently approved by the MLB Owners, but for the time being; leave the page as it is. Mention the relocation on a few branching pages, but do not change the team name or anything until the team itself acknowledges that it will become the Las Vegas Athletics. PontiacAurora (talk) 22:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target of the harassment IP. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change 'British Isles' to 'British and Irish Isles' or 'British and Hibernian Isles' Classifying the archipelago as simply 'British' perpetuates the Anglocentric view that the all the islands, specifically Ireland, belong to Britain or are "rightfully" British. This diminishes the local sovereignty and histories of the isles. 2600:6C44:113F:9F24:1805:3A61:AC80:FA27 (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: runs contrary to the closed consensus at Talk:British Isles § Changing the Name (Move) of the article to - British Isles (Atlantic Archipelago). microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 17:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not doneFor the bot. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17 November 2023

Reason: Persistent disruption--relentless copy editing by new accounts, with continuous MOS:OL and WP:ENGVAR issues, and a little vandalism now and again. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent addition of unsourced content by sock IPs and accounts at Jallah Jeem. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject to extended-confirmed protection per WP:GS/AA, one of the main cities of the Karabakh conflict that encounters frequent vandalism. TagaworShah (talk) 13:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged at WP:GS/AA Joyous! Noise! 01:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spamming by accounts using edit summaries to trade. Panian513 14:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of excessive plot detail and overlinking common words. Waxworker (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP has repeatedly vandalized article. D o o t e d . (talk) 15:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Last 3 weeks of edits are entirely just vandalism and revert, vandalism and revert. Wes sideman (talk) 15:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 02:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have extended it to six months and logged it at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 02:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Fairly frequent transphobic, or at least transphobic-adjacent, vandalism/content removal Soulbust (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to re-submit if the frequency picks up in future, but so far this month, there have only been two edits that are problematic. Both are from the same IP, so you might get better results at AIV if that same editor returns. Joyous! Noise! 01:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs from Pakistan keep adding "neo noir" as a genre against guidelines at WP: FILMGENRE and it not being a genre. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing by IP’s. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – recent uptick in disruptive editing this month by both IP's and registered users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To counteract persistent disruptive editing from unregistered IPs. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Creation of the page is protected. The subject seems to meet WP:ACTOR, sources have been added and at least 3 different users seem to consider that a standalone article has merit. Just added sources addressing issues raised by other users. Not sure why this article's creation was protected. Thank you. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was protected due to the constant re-creation attempts. What draft(s) are you referring to with the above? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(For more information, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&page=Faria+Abdullah which is available thru the "logs" link in the pagelinks template above.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply. I see the page was Afded and deleted, but the article must obviously have changed substantially since May 2021 so that (re)creation should be considered perfectly acceptable (Notability status has changed since she played significant roles in at least 3/4 films since then, as the draft improvements now show ).
Could an administrator please unprotect the page or move it from Draft:Faria Abdullah then? Thank you very much. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The draft needs to be reviewed and accepted, since it was originally deleted by community decision at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faria Abdullah. Stripping off the AFC tags, adding a few additional references, and requesting the draft be moved into main article space is out of process. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DareshMohan@Kailash29792 UtherSRG refused to lift the protection for reasons that I personally do not find very compelling at all, as I explained on his talk page. Thanks to all users who replied here. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:50, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The draft was declined on November 1st and again on the 7th due to continued sourcing concerns. There is no reason to lift the create protection on the article until an approved draft is provided. Requesting unprotection of the article title because the corresponding draft you're working on continues to be declined is like asking the other parent.-- Ponyobons mots 23:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your concern and reply. I started working on that draft today/yesterday (depending on your location), fwiw, and have no personal interest at stake in Faria Abdullah's career. I just thought she met WP:NACTOR and added sources accordingly before preparing the page for main, and was surprised to find creation protected. Hence this request. Various users have improved the page recently, apparently not enough, as of November 7, to satisfy the users who checked the page. I personally don't mind having other users spend time and assess the page or any page before it is moved to the Main, if they wish to, and if consensus is that they should, but I just would like to know how the refusal to lift protection in the present case is consistent with the explanatory essay that can be found at WP:DRAFT, which states: "Other editors, including the author of the page, but excluding editors with a conflict of interest, have a right to object to draftifying the page. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and, if necessary, list it at AfD." (....) " If anyone objects, it is no longer an uncontroversial move, and the page needs to be handled through other processes, such as deletion, stubbing, tagging, etc." Nothing mentions here "except if the page has been deleted in the past (and, in that case, even it if has evidently been improved and if the Afd was years ago)" or any restriction whatsoever. I understand that you believe there is no reason to lift the create protection. But I confess that, from my understanding of what I read, there's even less reason that I see to keep the said protection against creation. Unless it is mandatory to pass though a Review process for every article that was deleted in the past/draftified in the past/whose creation was declined repeated times. If it is is not mandatory, the correct process should, in my view, be: decrease protection/ allowing creation, and (2nd) Afd if anyone still thinks the article fails the guidelines it should respect. WP:Afc says "Attempting to bypass the process by moving the page, or cutting and pasting it into a new mainspace article, may lead to the page being moved back into draftspace again, speedy-deleted or listed for AFD, and repeated attempts may even lead to you being temporarily or permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia due to disruption." but also says "Established users, however, are encouraged to create articles directly if they do not need support from reviewers." (emphasis mine) And users who, when there is no ongoing review, remove Afc templates (even if they show creation has been declined in the recent pas) from a draft should therefore, I think, not be told that Removing the AFC tags is an action that can cause your account to be blocked. (as I was told) when they add sources and make the page ready for Main in evident good faith and in a collaborative spirit. I've asked twice to be directed to a policy or guideline that indicates, how, despite the essay containing DRAFTOBJECT, objecting to draft is, after all, not permitted in certain cases, but have so far received no indication of where I could find it. Now, if everyone on Wikipedia, except the users who tried to improve the page and think it's suitable for Main, believes this article is so special that it needs to be protected, then, by all means, let's wait for the result of the future/potential Afc review for as long as it takes, personally, I don't mind at all... but that is not my point. Thank you again. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Removing the AFC tags is disruptive. Enough accumulated disruptive behavior is grounds for being blocked. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
Is removing old AFC tags before moving the page to Main, disruptive? Are you positively sure? As for Enough accumulated disruptive behavior is grounds for being blocked, yes, everyone obviously agrees on that. Thank you for your input, anyway. Still, I note that for the third time you failed to answer my question about the obligation to submit the article to Afc, which is the only potential argument that I see here against a decreased protection of the page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:47, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Outside of the AFC review process, yes, that can be considered disruptive as it is an attempt to hide previous review comments. The obligation to submit to review comes from the article previously being AFD'd and G4'd. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this reply. So, just to make sure I understood what you mean with "removing the tags outside the Afc review process is disruptive". When I removed the templates in order to move the page to Main after having added sources, was I outside or inside the process?
Or do you mean that the rule for Drafts is "once a Draft, always a Draft until a reviewer decides otherwise". Is there any consensus about that? You mention a special restriction concerning articles that have been Afdd/G4d in the past. DRAFTOBJECT seems to contradict this (it does not mention any restriction whatsoever (let alone mentions Afd, nor G4), so maybe this rule you mention should be added there if there is consensus expressed about this somewhere.
And sorry to insist, but G4 speedy deletion criterion for Afd deleted articles that are recreated outside the Afc does not apply to articles that have been substantially modified. WP:G4 clearly says "It excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, and pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies". This is a Wikipedia Policy, unless I am mistaken. The concerned article meets both conditions: it has obviously been improved with post 2021 (date of the Afd) sources (so that it cannot be substantially identical to the deleted version, it is plainly impossible) AND the status of the subject has considerably changed (making reason for the deletion not apply anymore).
So maybe G4 did apply at the time of the various G4 deletion (including one by yourself in April 23; assuming that in 2022 and 2023 no user who had edited the page mentioned any of the 2022 lead roles Abdullah had played, nor used sources posterior to May 2021, which I find extremely hard to believe, myself) but the G4 criterion is at least now not valid anymore at all concerning the current version (that I, as anyone, can see). Can we all agree on that, at least?
Thank you again for taking the time to give me these explanations. I would personally like to leave it at that as I have no further comments and still hope the best decision can be taken. Whatever the outcome of the present request is, I will leave it to other users to move the concerned article to the Main, feeling it has now apparent sufficient merit, but slightly disheartened at the idea that efforts made to improve a page can be deemed disruptive. It would have been good if the note in the Afc explanatory page that states, "Established users, however, are encouraged to create articles directly if they do not need support from reviewers" had meant what I thought it meant, but I guess I was wrong. Best. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:16, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I don't think questions of interpretation/completeness of policy should be discussed here. Lectonar (talk) 10:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies if I gave you the impression I was discussing the policy, not the article in question. I thought I was only discussing the present situation of the article, not the policy in general. But fair enough, if my request can be addressed without my explanations, that's excellent. Thank you. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 16:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected. Just because a new version is substantially different from a deleted version doesn't necessarily mean it addresses the concerns in the AFD. And the primary concern was WP:TOOSOON. A recent reviewer also expressed this same concern in the review comments, indicating that the AFD decision is still relevant and valid. Therefore, I think it is best to keep the create-protection in place until the draft actually passes review. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by new users and IPs changing the Infobox result. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP has been insistently adding irrelevant fancruft to this article, and reverts me every time I try to remove it. I have asked them to stop, and they will not. I don't know what else to do because I don't want to just keep reverting everything they do and turn it into some kind of edit war. Blubewwy (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter Thank you for your action! I just wanted to let you know that the person seems to be editing again from a new IP address: @107.10.232.138. Blubewwy (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Consistent addition of innapropriate links. There may be offsite canvasing/sockpuppetry going on, as users World-Chicago, Radfems, and Feminist Woman have been adding the same links. (Note similarity between last two names). —Panamitsu (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
habits of those accounts are screaming Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ByteOr... wizzito | say hello! 04:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several cases of IP and new user political vandalism in the past months, in addition this page is about a very important office for international relations. TheFrenchKing (talk) 00:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unsourced redirect overwriting. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP vandalising the page with nonsense, has now created an account. Temp page protection requested. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 02:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 02:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after protections expired today. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 02:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been lots of attempts by IPs to add inappropriate external links to the page lately. Hatman31 (talk) 02:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 166.199.98.110 (talk) 02:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Will120 (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – disruption continues after protection expiration. wizzito | say hello! 04:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow burning edit war with one using keeping adding flags as decoration and loads of unsourced information. User gets warned, everything dies down and a few weeks later the whole shebang starts again. The Banner talk 22:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. By your own account. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mike Allen 01:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of repeat "translated text" edits that are not necessary. Typically coming from the same handful of users with few edits. Pac-Man PHD (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow editwar since November 12. Lets get them back to the talk page. Moxy- 16:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I would prefer not to do that as it would necessitate lifting the existing indef ECP and reimposing it whenever the full protection ends. Besides, we usually don't full-protect for slow-motion edit wars. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring from user LeoStar03 not adhering to wikipedia guidelines re. cast member lists. 103.40.135.22 (talk) 17:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced contented over a restarting program. The Banner talk 17:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last seems to have been two days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Trolling and assorted right-wing BS. Dronebogus (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP edit-warring. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2806:2F0:51C0:F3FC:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Several cases of IP and new user transphobic vandalism in the past 2-3 weeks. Reil (talk) 18:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Lolgtwrecked (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Promotional and unsourced edits to this BLP by IP editor. Tacyarg (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Really seems to have happened yesterday, and only yesterday. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated recent IP/anonymous public relations editing. Graywalls (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 63.164.153.222 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for one year. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of WP:FANCRUFT by new users and IPs. Examples here and here. Unnamed anon (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Slow burning edit-war resulting from an IP repeatedly inserting a dubious uncited claim to the article lede. No response to either edit summaries or talk page where I explain the problem with their conduct. Mr rnddude (talk) 20:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 77.118.143.74 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article, for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant trolling and POV pushing etc. Dronebogus (talk) 23:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 23:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Jesuisjefff (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. from the article indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Multiple single purpose WP:COI editors[134][135] edit warring to disrupt this article by fitting their own agenda. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 14:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the midst of filing a report at AN3, as previously suggested. Beccaynr (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now filed: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:2402:a00:401:7c3e_reported_by_User:Beccaynr_(Result:_). Beccaynr (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Result at ANEW is Blocked – for a period of a week 2402:A00:401:7C3E:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)). [136] Beccaynr (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:37, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Allyriana000 (talk) 01:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Looks like it died down once the pageant ended. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Malicious Edits. TheaEskey (talk) 05:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editing war with IP Trade (talk) 09:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: a 105.104.88.184 (talk) 10:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Two "separate" accounts are adding the identical unsourced information. As this relates to living people it is a BLP infringement (with a murder/kidnap case at the background) SchroCat (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring and disruptive editing by IndianaMoon22 184.180.217.57 (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant vandalism getting in the way of an GA review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive Vandalism. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 18:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a00:23c7:db07:4401::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Favonian (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection seems to hinder the flow of well researched and sourced material by certain indivulas. a less protected version would allow an honest debate. please consider TemporaryProfile00 (talk) 15:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • No. You're already flooding the talk page with poorly formatted material, including forum posts, and "verified" with blogs and Facebook posts. God forbid that happen in the article. Drmies (talk) 15:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Article is proteced as an arbitration remedy (WP:PIA) so you'll have to get consensus for your proposed changes on the article talk page. Favonian (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Medelinezezie (talk) 16:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Repeatedly created (under various names) and deleted article.. The only way it can make it into Wikipedia is through the WP:Articles for deletion process. Favonian (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hor Mok is a traditional Thai food. In the old days, it was used to wrap banana leaves and then put it under the oven with ashes put in so that the ashes were wrapped around it. This method was called Mok, which relied on the heat from the charcoal above. The above can cook normally, which will take quite a long time to cook because it does not directly touch the fire. later evolved into grilling on the stove Until the arrival of the Chinese crate came in, so it was changed to steaming instead. But still use the word Ho Mok as before, even though it is not cooked by fermenting again. In the days prior to the arrival of the Portuguese, cooking was simply wrapped in banana leaves, seasoned with various seasonings such as salt, fish sauce or fermented fish, wrapped in banana leaves, steamed or grilled until done. For Ho Mok nowadays Spring onions and basil leaves are the main condiments. Some locals add coriander. Examples of steamed dishes are steamed bamboo shoots, steamed fish roe, steamed banana blossoms, steamed red ant eggs, steamed fish, steamed mushrooms, steamed mushrooms and steamed rice. Dried bird's eye chili, shallots, sliced lemongrass, kaffir lime leaves. Some localities also add galangal or galangal.

According to cultural anthropologist Penny Van Esterik, the Southeast Asian coconut-based curries are the result of Indianization, that were introduced to Thailand and Myanmar since Dvaravati Kingdom before 10th century.[6] In the Ayutthaya Kingdom, have contacted the trade With the introduction of chillies from America [7], Ho Mok emerged as a mixture of meat and vegetables mixed with New World curry paste and coconut milk, a staple of Southeast Asia.

Mok in the food of North East Region (Isaan) of Thailand is different from Mok in Lao food. in Isaan food Meat dishes mixed with curry paste Seasoned and cooked, whether grilled or steamed, it is called Mok. As for the food of Laos, Luang Prabang Wrapped in a tall banana leaf, grilled to make mok. Steamed to call Mok or Moh. If it is wrapped in banana leaves, it is flat and grilled.

Later Introduced into Cambodia around 15th century when Cambodia is the part of Siam. Nowadays, Cambodia use Krueng which does not have chili as the main ingredient like Ho Mok in Thai But lately, the Cambodia people have started to add dried chili peppers as well. But it's very small if compared to eating chili in Thai people.[8] Futhermore, Cambodia people just started to use banana leaves wrap in around 21st century as the result of Thai influence. Zopelight (talk) 13:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Long-winded requests that are not in a "change X to Y" format are far less likely to be entertained, as are requests where the talk page is unprotected. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Steamed curry is not protected. Favonian (talk) 17:30, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Requesting indefinite ECP under WP:ARBPIA, not actioning it myself as I have contributed to the article. signed, Rosguill talk 21:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Amaury22:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent recent history of disruptive editing/vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18 November 2023

RAPO23 sock targets

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Articles are being frequently edited by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RAPO23 sockpuppets. OSJAH is the latest (now blocked after SPI report), but there's been a fair amount from this editor of late. Ravensfire (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though some of the latest socks were confirmed.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting a long-term semi-protection for this one (similar to that of Tim Walz and Dean Phillips) as it's been frequently targeted by socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Buzzards-Watch Me Work for an ongoing period of a year and a half - eleven socks have now edited the page (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). I understand many of these are long ago and not vandalism, but it's editors from a blocked sock farm and the page continues to be edited (as of yesterday) freely by socks. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – page has a long history of WP:PROMO edits. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 13:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There's not much in the history of much good happening, but on the other hand it's not that bad. Maybe a handful each month? It probably wouldn't hurt to protect it, but the page could use some work, so as long as it's not egregious I don't see a need at the moment. ~ Amory (utc) 20:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 11:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pacitti's entry has been mentioned in an online stream on Twitch after he pointed it out, prompting this to be a target of vanadalism from 'fans'. It was protected for some days, though I feel this may need to be longer. Mechanical Elephant (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You may be right that this will eventually need further protection but, as of this moment, the article hasn't been vandalized at all since the last round of protection expired so any additional protection at this point would be preemptive, which I'm generally not allowed to apply. That said, if or when vandalism begins to reoccur, please register a new request. Chetsford (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request PP due to vandalism per WP:GENSEX. Raladic (talk) 03:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive birth date changes. Waxworker (talk) 12:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 2001:448A:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) is already at the maximum of ten pages allowed in the partial block it's under. Blocking it sitewide will cause collateral damage; as will semi-protection on this page. This appears to be the best possible solution for now. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing and edit warring by IPs and SPAs. Skitash (talk) 13:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing, lots of promotional edits. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, they keep adding names of the players that are not members of the team or even handball players also I am asking a patrolling admin to block this IP since it is obvious that it is the same person that was doing similar things on some other pages i.e. [[137]] like this ip and many more Theonewithreason (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because 85.165.41.105 is a problematic user. See history page, IP talk page, and talk page question involved. It was signalled also here. Island92 (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP ranges and new users changing the sourced financial figures for quite sometime one [138]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Disruption has continued unabated since last, three-year protection expired. Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Palestine-Israel conflict. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip and new accounts changing box office collections, all crore numbers are referenced. Knitsey (talk) 19:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring Adakiko (talk) 12:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protection now unneeded. EW appears to have stopped. Adakiko (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor Joyous! Noise! 04:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range and new editor removing well sourced content / consensus version [139] [140] and adding unsourced [141] ; original researches (no relevance to the subject matter) [142] [143], copy-pasted non-English text possibly from a blog [144]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and logged at GS/CASTE. Daniel Case (talk) 07:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. LancedSoul (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP biased edits, personal attacks on edit-summaries, etc. Jingiby (talk) 05:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit protection was lifted recently, but already there have been no small number of disruptive edits and vandalism added. The game is apparently also a meme and remains popular, if not indefinite, I suggest another long edit protection. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 05:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 07:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs regularly adding blanket subjective statements regarding the player being the "best in the world", which is not verifiable. Seasider53 (talk) 11:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:90D8:13E:90AD:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several years of edit warring over lede wording. MrEarlGray (talk) 13:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 07:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 08:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Fbergo (talk) 13:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:1004:2E:800:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For a week. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs the past few months. Magitroopa (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper genre warring. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:EBC:B231:1300:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. For a week Daniel Case (talk) 07:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Student editors making a mess, one after the other. Kingsif (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Levels of constant unsourced and baseless content. Razorback250 (talk) 02:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm requesting pending changes protection due to a high level of IP and unregistered user vandalism for an infrequently edited page. This page is on an ongoing armed conflict that is featured on the front page of Wikipedia. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 03:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. You said it yourself ... "infrequently edited." Daniel Case (talk) 07:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced or self-published content. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 07:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism by IPs, more than 1/3 of edits is vandalism. Should be semi-protected. SouthParkFan2006 (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Unexplained content removal by multiple IPs Adakiko (talk) 12:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High vandalism. Island92 (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The spamming resumed hours after the last protection expired. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from new users & IPs. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 17:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Inexperienced and IP users constantly change details on the article to ones unacceptable for Wikipedia. Equalwidth (C) 10:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., too early for an indefinite semi. Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:BAIDUBAIKE/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessionalWikiMan11111‎. Rastinition (talk) 10:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Izno.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA IP hopping abuse. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator GorillaWarfare. Favonian (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. vandal target The Night Watch (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. The Night Watch (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. The Night Watch (talk) 19:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring again. Multiple IPs Adakiko (talk) 12:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Mindmatrix. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 14:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Slow editwar, POV-pushing. The Banner talk 11:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. User has been warned not to continue the slow edit war. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resume of disruptive editing by anonymous editor(s) following last protection duration. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism resumed shortly after this page's protection expired. SparklyNights (t) 15:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent BLP violations/vandalism by IP users changing pronouns from "they" to "it". Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice added to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection expired and various editors have resumed putting lyrics on the page.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Lyrics are being added here as well.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Page has been indefinitely protected for 2 years; protecting admin has been inactive since March. The vast majority of edits in the past year have been made by a singe user. The incident which lead to the protection is no longer a pressing topic. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  03:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected per request. clpo13(talk) 03:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Janhrach (talk) 19:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: targeted vandalism by an editor with a ton of IPs on different ranges Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Brennan Everette (🗣️ | ) 01:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. for three years. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA target The Night Watch (talk) 18:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Just got closed as delete. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Might be time to wrap up this Elon/anti-semitism/conspiracy theory mishegoss but I am WP:INVOLVED. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. nea Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting temporary protection due to back and forth edit wars with IPs regarding a news story that broke out about him technically being on the team for 29 years Maxx1222 (talk) 03:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent removal of maintenance tags by IP-hopping IPs, SPAs, and COI/UPE editors without resolving the issues. Article has also been edited by a now-renamed sock puppet. Netherzone (talk) 20:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There haven't been any edits in over 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unconstructive IPs and blocked socks have been editing this article. Also a highly viewed a wiki page as the season is nearing its end (next week to be exact). Maybe at least 2 weeks will suffice. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 01:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 182.3.139.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Plus GS/Beauty pageants. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 06:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level vandalism by new editors. Ajayraj890 (talk) 06:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Unregistered IPs are editing the article and damaging it. MNWiki845 (talk) 07:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism made by an IPv6 anonymous editor based in Malaysia, believed to the same person based on the records of edit pattern in my talkpage.  Ṉight Ḻantern 🏮 08:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IPs. Tammbecktalk 09:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 09:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the image of the home depicted on this page. Barbra Streisand is a very public person and has suffered break-ins to her home. By associating this term that bears her name with the photo of her home at a time of increasing anti-semitism, is unnecessary increasing the risk to her welfare. Here There Be Dragons (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per this. Aside from which the article isn't even protected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is protected now. Discuss on the article talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 10:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant reverting and rereverting of the lede despite ongoing discussion, both by experienced editors and newbies. Slatersteven (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This has already been Extended Confirmed since December 2022. The next level would be Full Protection, only admins would be allowed to edit. Since you are only concerned about the lede edits, Full Protection seems excessive. — Maile (talk) 14:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent spam attacks from IP user Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent spam attacks from IP User Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 2601:246:C000:3FF0:BDE6:1F54:565E:2036 (talk) 13:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term persistent IP vandalism that had been going on for the past few months. Skitash (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – The caste pages like this are disrupted occasionally and there is difficulty in tracking disruption on regular basis. Admantine123 (talk) 15:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 102.89.44.38 (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Invalid request. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 102.89.44.38 (talk) 15:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Invalid request. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: PERSISTENT VANDALISM: High level of malicious edits using poorly sourced info and biased language. TheaEskey (talk) 16:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further proof of the need for the request

Snow cactus continues to make malicious edits using poorly sourced info and biased language.

Please stop editing my page Jonathan Hatami with biased language and poorly sourced information. Thank you. TheaEskey (talk) 00:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced? Please be more specific. Nothing is false. Please stop deleting. I’ve written a script that will continue to undue your edit, so please stop wasting your time. Snowcactus0 (talk) 09:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources you’re relying on are not reliable sources per wikipedias guidelines please stop or I will report you. TheaEskey (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC). Look at these if you’re confused about what I’m talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Encyclopedic_style and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple new IPs editing against consensus re: infobox with no new talk page discussion. (See talk page for consensus.) EducatedRedneck (talk) 18:09, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. This is long overdue. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content about a BLP from various IPs. GiantSnowman 18:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:02, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stream of IPs trying to delete any reference to Ahmadis (see Ahmadiyya) being Muslims - Arjayay (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – vandalism related to Arab-Israeli conflict. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 18:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket World Cup

Reason: Expected hike in IP related vandalism after the 2023 Cricket World Cup outcome. Lamba Chaura (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Page needs protection from a POV-pusher who uses different IPs and now an account. Semsûrî (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – PP removed, IP spam/vandalism immediately resumes. Please PP for a longer interval. This article doesn't have frequent, material changes, as the protocol is well established. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 20:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 20:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

example 1, example 2, example 3 Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 20:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All page permission for Android 118.179.97.61 (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – It's not at all clear which page you're referring to, or what you want done to it. Favonian (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. The article is repeatedly edited by the same individual making unsourced changes, the invidivual in question uses several different IP's making a block ineffective, but a protection would at least force them to discuss their changes rather than repeatedly restore unsourced content. TylerBurden (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring between various new accounts and IP addresses. Panian513 22:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Latest target for harassment IP. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target for IP harassment vandal. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target for IP harassment vandal. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target for IP harassment vandal. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. GSK (talkedits) 20:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would decline. The persistent editing is infrequent, so that only a long-term protection would help, and I would rather not protect a talk page long-term.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I concur with Ymblanter. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the section, Israeli counterattack, parts of the referenced articles are omitted to make it seem that the IDF counterattack causing civilian casualties is greater than the referenced article.

specifically in the part "They immediately encountered difficulty in determining which outposts and settlements were occupied, and distinguishing between Palestinian militants and the soldiers and civilians on the ground.[166] The helicopter crews initially poured down fire at a tremendous rate, and in 4 hours, about 300 targets were attacked. Only later did the crews begin to slow down the attacks and carefully select targets.[166]" omits the point made in the article between those two points, that the first missions were redirected to the Gaza barrier. thereby changing the meaning of the referenced article. 58.84.143.17 (talk) 11:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, please provide what you want changed and the sourcing for it. nableezy - 21:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove this hatnote above per WP:NAMB. 2001:4452:1A3:5600:65BC:A457:C416:DFD8 (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As that is the main topic, you'd think it would be more appropriate to remove it from Gamergate (ant) and not that one. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done because there is nothing to do. If there was a hatnote on either article, there isn't one now. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change the count of Israeli civilian casualties from October 7, or at least address the problem of discrepancy between what Israeli authorities announced as sourced through The Times of Israel (859) and what Haaretz published in its detailed list of victims from the known Hamas massacres (584). To my knowledge the Haaretz list is the only publicly available list of this kind and it counts 1177 Israeli casualties from October 7 to this day. Somebody has to address this somehow. 31.13.208.85 (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page has been recently persistently vandalized by IP editors. Sanglahi86 (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am writing to request full page protection for Microsoft Gaming page. The increasing popularity and prominence of Microsoft's gaming division have led to a surge in edits and updates to the page. Unfortunately, this has also resulted in a rise in vandalism and misinformation. Implementing page protection would help safeguard the accuracy and reliability of the content by preventing unauthorized edits. By ensuring that only trusted and knowledgeable editors can modify the page, we can maintain the integrity of the information and provide users with a reliable resource on Microsoft Gaming. Ryan York (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create redirect to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC about the criteria for existence of emoji redirects (2nd) as was done previously at Wikipedia:😃↪️📊. Thanks, microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 17:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever does this (if you deem it acceptable and uncontroversial) would you mind either removing the commented surrounding the template at the top of the discussion (so as to uncomment it out), or notifying me on my talk page so I could do it? Much appreciated, microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 17:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MicrobiologyMarcus: Why? Who would actually search for that? And I am reluctant to create a redirect to a location that isn't a permanent location. Discussion sections eventually get archived, breaking any redirects to them. It is better to create the redirect after the discussion is archived. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a double redirects occured. 2001:448A:1021:28B1:AC87:3C28:3265:7B7D (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC) 20:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-extended-confirmed users may edit talk page, though only to suggest edits to the page. In principle, we had two non-ec users editing the page recently, but their contribution was not disruptive, and may be with some stretch they were discussing edits to the page (though I can easily see another administrator would interpret it differently). I would probably not protect at this point, but I would like to see a second opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From most recent AC clarification, non-ec users may only use the talk page to make constructive edit requests. That isnt what is happening there. We have WP:RFED for any edit-requests if a talk page is protected. nableezy - 23:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We really should deploy the edit filter I suggested over at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment/Archive_125#Statement by Pppery to keep this from being necessary. Until that happens I would say protect - there haven't been any actual edit requests on the talk page in weeks. I would protect temporarily rather than indefinitely, though - the attention will die down at some point and we can revert to either the edit filter I proposed or just the prior edit request process, though.
I'm not a regular here, and this is rather far from my area of expertise in adminship, so other admins can give my opinion however much weight they feel it deserves. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC) 20:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Discretionary sanctions are primarily intended to protect the mainspace. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is absolutely not true, 300/50 applies to AFDs and the very fact that it has votes by unqualified users is enough to protect it. Requesting this be reviewed by another admin. nableezy - 23:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this should be protected, and have deactivated the declined template so this doesn't get archived without action. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There hasn't been a productive edit from a non-autoconfirmed editor at the article since June, 2023. The only editing in the past month and a half has been an IP adding the same evidently unsourced material into the lede. Mr rnddude (talk) 22:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuation of persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content, would it be possible to give the page protection until after the event is over? (November 26) YoloMc8562 (talk) 09:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Both this and Dan Fable. Both are receiving vandalism straight after protection expired. Launchballer 10:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Clear sockpuppetry from Raymarcbadz. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism. Island92 (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed protection: As the site of the current conflict, these articles are subject to new editors seeking to redefine them as part of Russia. There is a consensus agreed here to place Russia-Ukraine conflict articles under ECP. Cambial foliar❧ 08:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This should be extended confirmed protected per WP:GS/RUSUKR. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 10:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Page has been protected for the past month due to disruptive editing, and the same IP user, 47.147.168.60, has again added reverted the edits I have made. This cannot be tolerated any longer. This page MUST be indefinitely protected, so all users do NOT disruptively edit a TV show article that has NOT been on the air in two years, with information done AFTER the show was cancelled. PLEASE take care of this. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @BrickMaster02: please have a thorough read of our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk) 09:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perennial vandalism target, probably because of the "XXXX" or the fact that it's a brand of beer. Doesn't appear to have had a legitimate IP edit since August, and before that since April. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:10, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am trying to move the article Baba Mohan Rama to this page as it is more relevant Yajush 08:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Declined Please the process at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Lectonar (talk) 09:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing by Users and IP users, page was protected before, but once the PP expired, disruptive editing happened again in the form of removing sourced content to change the infobox. Noorullah (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ProfessionalWikiMan11111

  1. The current protection measures seem ineffective, as puppet accounts with specific purposes may hold multiple dormant accounts. It's possible to easily awaken some of these accounts to increase edit counts and gain higher editing privileges.
  2. Accounts that have been recently active can be detected by the filter "LTA edit summary or editing pattern hit (Oshwah)."
  3. If technically feasible and without causing undue inconvenience, it is advisable to implement IP blocking. Rastinition (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Upgraded the protection to ECP. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit history has a long history vandalism relating to "Skibidi Toilet" when the article is not related to such topic. Subariba (talk) 13:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A user repeatedly edits wrongly and removes information. EngrShakamal (talk) 08:51, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Both editors warned for edit warring. – bradv 16:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Most ips dont need access to this and when an ip edits its usually disruptive •Cyberwolf•talk? 14:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. – bradv 16:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protecting admin has no edits for over three years. This page was put on indefinite pending edits in 2014, when the player was in poor form for Manchester City. The page is no longer a hot topic, the past 100 edits go back to this January. Pending changes is cumbersome as the subject is now a manager and after every game his statistics are updated, with no need for a new source because the source is updated as well. Pending change watchers have reverted these updates because a new source hasn't been added, though the old source suffices in itself. 5.151.105.233 (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotectedbradv 16:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I would like to boldly move David Bell (historian) to David A. Bell since it's by far the WP:COMMONNAME for this person. However, the page was protected from creation by Jarry1250 in 2012, apparently from a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive229#List_created. Jarry1250 has already been asked once before to unprotect this page. I don't think this page needs to continue to be protected, so I would like to request its unprotection. Malerisch (talk) 11:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotectedbradv 16:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editwarring and elevated IP vandalism. Sub31k (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv 16:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mike Allen 15:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv 16:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple users; adding information about the team, beyond the show's canceled in 2021. Their reasoning is that "we like seeing the girls evolve, grow, and see who is up and coming." If this wasn't about the TV show, that would be fine. Maintaining the accuracy of the page is highly requested, and it seems that these people are not here to build an encyclopedia. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv 16:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP and newly registered vandalism by removing cited information. Ajayraj890 (talk) 15:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Ajayraj890: this is fundamentally a content dispute (albeit a disruptive one), so I recommend raising the matter on the article's talk page. – bradv 16:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – BLP violating socks adding speculative death dates in the future. #prodraxis connect 15:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Serious BLP vios and vandalism. I requested protection for this page a few days ago, and it was semi-protected for 3 days. That protection has just expired and the disruption has started up again, with more IP edits having to be revision deleted. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 17:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing/vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing by both IP's and registered users. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hammersoft (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip and new account vandalism

WP:BLP violations. Knitsey (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I expect it will need more at least until he signs. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change the number of October 7 civilian deaths from 859 to 584, according to the data provided on Haaretz list of casualties.

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-10-19/ty-article-magazine/israels-dead-the-names-of-those-killed-in-hamas-massacres-and-the-israel-hamas-war/0000018b-325c-d450-a3af-7b5cf0210000 31.13.208.85 (talk) 23:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Haaretz source provides this info with a delay afaik, the date is also 19 October, a month ago. Selfstudier (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done nableezy - 18:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There is a meme going around, or so I've heard pertaining to this article encouraging disruptive editing. Likely going to be around for a while.  🇮🇱JayCubby🇮🇱  talk 18:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was three days ago. Before that, disruption was approximately a week prior. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – History of persistent disruptive editing with almost no edits being constructive. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption before today was seven months before, which is too sparse even for pending-changes. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism is back after recent expiration of protections. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 24.229.38.91 (talk · contribs) blocked by Favonian. Disrupted by one IP/account in a month and they got blocked. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing, would recommend protecting the page as this topic is a frequent target of IP's due to legends/folklore. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disrupted once in a month-and-a-half. Sdrqaz (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit-warring and vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implication of talk page protection on Requests for Comment

Will edit requests for contributions to WP:RFC/A on protected talk pages be turned down automatically when requested here or may IP-users !vote in proteced RfC in some way? 89.206.112.13 (talk) 11:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ARBECR, non EC voters can only make edit requests, sorry. Selfstudier (talk) 12:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does that mean they should post their !vote comment here and you will add it to the protected talk page? 89.206.112.13 (talk) 13:04, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. As I understand it, non-EC editors are not allowed to participate in internal project discussions (e.g., AfD, RFC, RM) related to this topic area. As noted, non-EC editors are strictly limited to specific edit requests on this page. My understanding is that this is intended to prevent sockpuppetry and general abuse/disruption. If you want to get involved, I would recommend creating a Wikipedia account and making constructive edits to articles that are not EC-protected. Becoming EC will necessarily (and is intended to) take time. Here is Wikipedia's contentious topics enforcement procedure, for more information. Cheers! WillowCity(talk) 16:17, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have been making constructive edits from various IPs for years, but not once have I heard someone object to IPs partaking in discussions. This interpretation of whatever unknown policy your understanding is based on seems to absolutely prevent the submission of any edit request when both the article and talk pages are protected, which clearly can't be correct. I have no intention of becoming EC myself, and while editing itself may not be, the ability to request edits is incumbant on any user. What is the correct procedure to do so when a talk page is protected? 89.206.112.13 (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I invite you to re-read WillowCity's last message, as they pretty much explained it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The other important part of the explanation is that WP:ARBECR was recently amended by ARBCOM to restrict IP/newbie editing to just edit requests. See this discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – per WP:ARBECR. One may not like this policy, but this board is not the right place to complain. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 November 2023

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is brand new. If problematic behavior begins, resubmit. No need to preemptively apply protection. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Spike in disruptive editing from new and anonymous users due to the Argentine coalition's presidential candidate winning the election yesterday (19 November). Many new editors are single-purpose accounts, focused on removing certain labels from that specific article. Yue🌙 18:16, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP and account hopping vandal. Panian513 22:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:02, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP and account hopping vandal within 24 hours of the previous protection's expiration. Panian513 22:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent unsourced/disruptive changes in the article, primarily from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: Did you mean 3 months or 3 days? It seems here you've said 3 months but the protection expires 22:27, 22 November 2023 (and not sure which one you meant, lol). Magitroopa (talk) 22:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter, through the end of the calendar year should be sufficient since the season will end in a few weeks. Thank you to @Magitroopa for this request. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Back-and-forth and no discussion posted to talk. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:50, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. It takes at least two people to edit war. Don't edit war. If you want to discuss the disagreement on the talk page, start the discussion. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please change "Golden Greek cross and discs of the Byzantine Empire.png" to "Golden Greek cross and discs of the Byzantine Empire.svg" Rainbowlack (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Administrators on the English-language Wikipedia have no authority on other Wikis. Favonian (talk) 21:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Thanks for the request, however you are on the English Wikipedia project. I would recommend making the request on the cz: project instead, as they're much more likely to understand the language and policies for their project. - AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 21:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Edit war going on for nearly 2 weeks started by an editor blocked for WP:NOTHERE.[145] The misleading edit summaries about "consensus" and "stable version" are making it annoying. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 19:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit war is still ongoing. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 03:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page—badly needed, it would seem, judging by the incivility in the most recent discussion there, the one this protection has been specifically requested to force a resolution to. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I am the creator of the page and I am currently having an edit war with an anon who kept putting information that are unsourced and unreferenced. ChrisGultieri (talk) 23:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'd also recommend reading WP:OWNER. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent revelations have led to a firestorm of undiscussed IP warfare edits going for the extremes. I discussed partial protection on the talk page and 4 of 4 are in favor. Suggest edit requires autoconfirmed for 1 month. North8000 (talk) 23:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 03:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. BangJan1999 00:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:GENSEX. BangJan1999 00:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's a fairly new article ... I'd prefer not to apply longer CTOPS-level protections until and unless that kind of chronic misgendering/deadnaming becomes present as it has in (regrettably) so many other articles about trans people. (I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though). Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP editor reversed merger of content with List of programs broadcast by PBS Kids in contravention of Talk:List of programs broadcast by PBS Kids#Merger proposal 25 January 2023. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 01:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, Russian user (I suspect a banned account) has utilized multiple IPs and is just attempting to remove mention of Noktundo. It is pointless to engage with the user as they continue to simply either revert edits or create up new topics without engaging in good faith to my comments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/45.58.94.255 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.98.151.41 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/168.91.61.39 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/172.98.144.173 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.22.174.209

All likely same IP abuser, I can provide more IPs that they've abused for the Noktundo page if necessary Sunnyediting99 (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Take the IPs to SPI. We just do page protections here. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism over the past few days ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 04:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to X and Elon Musk lawsuits, which has become a heavily politicized situation with wide social media expose, I believe that Media Matters should get a higher protection level to protect from vandalism. EnzoTC (talk) 04:09, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting WP:CTOPS enforcement here too if possible. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a real flurry a couple of days ago, but nothing since. I have put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1998 217.218.231.198 (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unconstructive IP edits. Equalwidth (C) 04:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 07:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 09:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing unexplained content removal from various IPs from a similar location in Sweden. Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: editwarring Magherbin (talk) 07:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. -- LemonSlushie 🍋 (talk) (edits) 08:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Every edit in the past ten days has been reverted by somebody else, with people now referring to WP:BRD and edit-warring, despite no talk page activity. Maybe some protection will force it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Outside of this vandalism edit, the only other problems have been generated by 4.36.74.50 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who hasn't been warned at all. Given the single point source, there's no need for protection. I've placed an edit warring warning on their talk page. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Edit conflict - defer to Hammersoft Chetsford (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC); edited 13:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: DNS check places all IPs responsible for removing content since October 20 in North Carolina, where the subject is running for governor. Members of the subject's election campaign removing factual content they don't like? Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent vandalism over last 7 days. Engineerchange (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of a non-existent film called ‘’Falling Shelter: The Last Day’’, which claims to be produced by Tencent Pictures and Moonton, inspired by the video game, ‘’Falling Shelter’’.

Both of the ones who produced mentioned are considered as foreign and not as Filipino movie production outfits, a violation of MMFF rules, and also claims to be one of the entries for the festival. Did research on this matter and shows none.

Current films entering in this year's fest is 10, not 11.

User who vandalised it is an IP address, who is unregistered, and by various IP addresses although begins with 110 prefix. Probable until January 3, 2024 as end for the temporary semi-protection as my suggestion.

See edits as evidence:
-Edit difference 1
-Edit difference 2
-Edit difference 3. Jhenny38 (Starters talk, My contributions) 12:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One user warned. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP has been vandalizing this page way too much. ThatOneWolf (talk|contribs) 15:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level edit warring by sock accounts, newly registered accounts, and IP users. Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Tamzin. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: This page has a long, long history of being protected - both for being the target of vandalism and ongoing attempts to blank content. Sockpuppets from WP:Sockpuppet investigations/TylerKutschbach are WP:GAMEing the system to get semi protection and then mass blanking this page as socks from this farm regularly do. The page is indefinitely semi-protected but given the repeated usage of socks to vandalise (check the history for at least eight examples so far this year) in spite of existing semi-protection, ECP feels necessary. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:30, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Media Matters in spotlight due to Twitter/X lawsuit. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 14:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous socking by PaullyMatthews socks. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing and long history of protections. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. in addition to the blocks--Ymblanter (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 14:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, Jetstreamer, doesn't the cited News24 source say that service to Abidjan would be terminated in 2020? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism and block-evading sockpuppets. Skitash (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Mostly by UP users. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 16:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dl.thinker (talk) 17:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Addition of unsourced content added by IPs. HorrorLover555 (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP user repeatedly makes edits to page without citing sources. I asked them to go to talk page. I am requesting semi-protection to encourage them to talk on talk page or react to my request that they cite sources. Bluerasberry (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Robe4x (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I have spoken to the admin whom deleted the article and went ahead put in request for undelete I was advised to make the request to take the article title out of protection so they can creat the draft for this article I’ll make sure the article is not created without admins and Wikipedia rules thank you ....... . DWashingtonn (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Denied - UtherSRG (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – for the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks. I'll try to get it right next time. :) - UtherSRG (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: News articles have stated that Kiko Loureiro has left the band (https://www.guitarworld.com/news/kiko-loureiro-leaves-megadeth), but his statement say's he only extending his absence from the band (https://www.instagram.com/p/Cz1kNfvsq1g). Mewhen123 (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This really isn't a reason for protection. It should settle down soon. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from user Yann; adding a clip from an Israeli dub on an article published in English. I don't see a purpose as to why, and the claim about it being "a free license from Disney" seems likely fabricated. He's been doing the same thing for the articles of Bunk'd and Raven's Home. I feel like these pages should be protected, if he isn't given a strict warning. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What a bullshit! These extracts are useful to show what these sitcoms look like to someone who doesn't know. There are therefore valuable to the articles. I can see that BrickMaster02 didn't even watch them, and even less checked that the license at the source is indeed free. Yann (talk) 20:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent edits from new accounts deleting sourced information and making unverified claims. benǝʇᴉɯ 19:08, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Which no one's done on an article created a couple of days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 23:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of an IP-switching vandal. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP addresses. ThatOneWolf (talk|contribs) 00:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Feel free to bring this back if the frequency increases. Joyous! Noise! 01:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Vandalism from multiple auto-confirmed accounts, possible sockpuppetry when both only made sandbox edits before going straight to this page with attacks on subject. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 03:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IP users. SCP-2000 05:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – contentious topic. Shadow4dark (talk) 05:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As WP:ARBIRP, WP:KURDS. El_C 07:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Upgrading to ECP protection per WP:ARBPIA restriction, this page was already semi-protected last 16 May 2020, due to move warring. 2001:4452:1A3:5600:3D3B:4026:4894:716D (talk) 06:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 07:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent edit warring and vandalism on this BLP and ARBPIA page. Marokwitz (talk) 09:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WP:ARBECR by way of WP:AP2, WP:PIA, WP:RUSUKR and more. El_C 09:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Dev Mahey (talk) 11:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:CASTE. El_C 12:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism 2601:246:C000:3FF0:6DE4:CE6:5AC:2FDA (talk) 14:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA BLP page. Marokwitz (talk) 14:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Firefangledfeathers. El_C 15:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Semi-protect this page (indefinitely) if possible. – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 12:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Not enough recent disruption to warrant protection at this time, though, Akshadev. If and/or when that changes, feel free to relist. El_C 12:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was expecting more but it's also fine for now! EI_C – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 12:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 15:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC) 15:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 15:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page is categorized within [[Category:Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected biographies of living people]] but subject is deceased. C679 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected UtherSRG (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions using poor sourcing as discussed at Talk:List of biggest box-office bombs#The Flash. Betty Logan (talk) 16:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing continues after protections expired in early October. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There should be no protection on false information about such a terror group. 141.226.25.215 (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This topic is too hot to allow unrestrained editing. Make an edit request on the article's talk page. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP posting pictures of phalluses onto my talk page, could this be protected for a few days so I don't have to randomly see penises on my talk page?. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2a00:801:7a0:d87d::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Nthep. Favonian (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 19:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 21:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 21:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Block evasion by WP:LTA/ARARAT. Too many different IP ranges to make a report. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent seasonal vandalism, as with every year, is back. Perhaps best to protect till post-holiday. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after protections expired in late September. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 21:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, likely related to the Israel-Palestine conflict. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2023

Reason: High level of IP POV editing GuardianH (talk) 19:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism by IP sockpuppet. BattleshipMan (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption after recent news from Ukraine, also now WP:GS/RUSUKR. TylerBurden (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter Thanks, but it seems to have been protected for 2 days, not a year. TylerBurden (talk) 21:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I had a similar accident yesterday, I think I know where the bug is. Ymblanter (talk) 21:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – She said comments about the Israel Hamas war, leading to BLP and even some racist edits from people on both sides of the conflict. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 23:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism (block-evading sockpuppets) and unexplained addition of misleading content. Skitash (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in the form of a blp violation regarding the sexuality of a former student Atlantic306 (talk) 23:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also WP:REVDELs. El_C 02:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism began immediately after the protection was lifted.   Aloha27  talk  01:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Deluge of non-actionable edit requests, failure to cite sources, etc, which is becoming a time drain. Should at least be semi-protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're an administrator though, aren't you? -- ThatOneWolf (ChatEdits 22:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I've become sufficiently WP:INVOLVED that I would prefer another admin push the button. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edit requests in a week. Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing in months. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit was 16 days ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of page vandalism by anonymous users -- appears to be related to or motivated by Israel - Hamas conflict. Johnnie Bob (talk) 23:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Three instances in two weeks: apart from 22 November, last one was on the 11th. Please report again if it increases in frequency. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP violations and vandalism. Jprg1966 (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last IP edit four days ago; please re-report if it recurs with high frequency. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 01:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection required. Editor keeps slow edit-warring to push changes, while refusing to seek a consensus on the talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:AP2. El_C 04:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection is required. An editor continues to slow edit-war changes, without seeking consensus on the talkpage. GoodDay (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:AP2. El_C 04:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 04:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 23:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. BusterD (talk) 23:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. As WP:PIA. BusterD, were you just looking at the mis-linked redirect? Because there's been disruption by non-EC users to the actual article it redirects to, which is Indonesia–Palestine relations. Granted, it was a few weeks ago, but WP:CTOP pages and ARBPIA, especially, are to be evaluated more strictly, I challenge (most recently, earlier in the day here). El_C 01:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's been almost six weeks since the last disruptive edit. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A format not carried by the station in three years is repeatedly been asserted to still be associated with the station by IPs, without any direct evidence. WCQuidditch 02:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This might actually be mooted, at least for now, by the one-week block on 2604:2d80:bf02:a200::/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) that was made shortly before I posted the request; if so, consider this withdrawn. WCQuidditch 02:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by requestor. El_C 04:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The full protection (which is not due to expire until the 4 December) is no longer necessary because the discussion regarding the locus of the dispute (whether or not the sexual assault allegations against him by his sister should be included) has died down, and the article is now outdated due to recent events. The protecting admin is currently inactive. I would recommend medium-term semi protection if the full protection is removed. Hemiauchenia (talk) 03:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Reduced from full to semi. Fuzheado | Talk 06:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 06:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. El_C 09:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This page was just vandalized, requesting temporary protection,. Comintell (talk) 06:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Yet again, another high level of vandalism which was made some time around Tuesday, which coincides with when Pacitti streams on Twitch. This page is being more and more vandalised each time it gets unprotected. The page protection only lasted around a week or so last time, which was earlier this month. I think now, it is fair for the page to be protected for a longer period of time. Mechanical Elephant (talk) 07:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per WP:PROMOTION. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Favonian Thanks for the quick response. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unregistered (IP) user or users successively reverting edits without explanation. Sisuvia (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 13:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 14:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DoneFavonian (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

change it to past tense, as it has now been removed off air and has been cancelled. Noisyowl50 (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Top Gear (2002 TV series) is not protected. Favonian (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 15:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC) 15:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Joyous! Noise! 18:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Koshchki123 (she/they) (talk) 16:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption to a WP:BLP--trade rumors. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Joyous! Noise! 19:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from some-one who keeps changing IP adresses. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Recent unsourced additions and some BLP violations which may require Revision Deletion. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and sockpuppetry – more of the same vandalism, once again, immediately after unprotection DarmaniLink (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24 November 2023

Reason: Controversial topic which is why it could potentially get attacked and it's contents changed. There are a lot of controversy articles as well which could be used as references so I would suggest that a strict eye is kept on whatever is added or changed. 2001:F40:904:1E85:94BF:4E88:C1FC:6971 (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Joyous! Noise! 18:22, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page, which might be responsive to your concerns. We'll see. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption. A primary target article for new copy editors, with few improvements, lots of reversions, and the standard MOS:OL and WP:ENGVAR issues. Over and over again. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I know it's annoying, but it looks like it's infrequent enough for the regular editors on the page to keep under control. Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: False information--basically a lie-- placed by someone in full paragraph 10 of the page. I have just added a correction denying this accusation. Powelljiml (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by hopping Israeli IPs. tgeorgescu (talk) 22:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: tgeorgescu, and it's vandalism because...? You're just using rollback without any added info. El_C 01:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: It's vandalism because religious fundamentalists happily delete sourced information which is contrary to their religious beliefs. For mainstream Bible scholars there is no doubt that Yahweh was the son of El. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I see internal links added, not sourced info removed. I don't think you're likely to find that many Bible scholars who administer this venue, so none of this is immediately intuitive. El_C 02:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page is being hijacked by many different IPs who add unsourced sentences and add their own photos. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pravakar Maharana and also see page history. There are more than 10 IPs. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 18:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 07:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Disruptive editing by 62.88.128.134 Equalwidth (C) 10:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The is recently edited by a sockpuppet. Please provide extended confirm protection to this page, as this page is a section Warner Bros. Discovery India which is already protected. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 11:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC) 17:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:DE and vandalism by IP editors. Adding and reverting the same number of bytes, making it look like manual reverts but actually sneaking edits in between [146] [147]. Jeraxmoira (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:DE and vandalism by IP editors. Sush150 (talk) 18:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Several non-consctructive edits over the last few days by a possible sockpuppet account. Semi-protection might be enough. Masatami (let's talk!) 21:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long term target of a Brazilian vandal Niddo ffdxx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) under various gibberish account names and IP addresses, claiming that Megalonyx is a big cat. Previously semi-protected which seems to work as a sufficient deterrent. Can I request that the protection be at least 6 months? They've been at this for half a year now. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 23:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by Ips again after its protection has disappeared in Nov 6. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 23:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I think this page needs a permanent form of protection- since September of 2022, IP accounts come and change information about William's children, or try to add names for them with no source. There is a specific note on the page about his children saying "do NOT change without a reliable source", but it is still frequently changed. The page has been protected for several periods in the past, but this same vandalism keeps occurring once the page protection expires. GraziePrego (talk) 00:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting 24 hour semi-protection due to persistent vandalism following breaking of an NFL season record. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 00:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Seawolf35 T--C 03:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Instances of specific anonymous IPs reverting to older edits which were removed after consensus; note usage of different tables. gavre (al. PenangLion) (talk) 05:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since the protection expired at the start of the month, there have been several unnecessary edits again. Nobody (talk) 06:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP hopping by subject or someone related by removing controversies. Might need a temporary semi to cool things down, but blocks on IP's might work too. NotAGenious (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ad Orientem (talk) 18:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 11:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs are at it again, changing the date of birth from 1974 to 1976. Shu Qi said that she was born in 1974, but her fans know better than her, apparently. Edelseider (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Adding unsourced content – Constant addition of unsourced content and copyvio image by unregistered users. FrB.TG (talk) 11:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing ip vandalism. some of it also breaks the formatting. cogsan (give me attention) (see my deeds) 12:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2603:6011:F103:AE5:CC12:18D3:E6AB:2E89 (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruptive editing from newer accounts, despite being taken to ANI, (which got previous users blocked), other people keep reviving unsourced content on the page. Noorullah (talk) 14:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism from IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being targeted by sockpuppets. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 15:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of a talk-page entry by an IP-hopper. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent editing by non ECP users regarding Israel-Palestine related issues. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP does not appear to be warranted at this time. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 17:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC) 17:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ad Orientem (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and ongoing unnoticed vandalism by IPs to a school page. microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 19:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rash of IP and new account vandalism/spurious edits in the past week. Geoff | Who, me? 19:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP editor repeatedly adding information without consensus. Mackensen (talk) 19:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not true, 611fan2001 was the one that started the issue in the first place, I was only trying to prevent vandalism he keeps causing. He also sends rude and nasty messages to users whenever they accuse him of his behavior, he will not accept criticism whenever you try to reason with him. It still baffles my mind that you guys haven’t warned him yet. 199.180.167.20 (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you accuse an editor of WP:VANDALISM you need to provide diffs that show it. If he's sending "rude and nasty messages" we need diffs of those. What you're doing is reinstating edits that do not have consensus on the talk page. You need to engage there and not edit war. If you keep doing this you're going to get blocked, regardless of whether you're right on the merits. Mackensen (talk) 19:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go look at his history of his edits, you will see I’m right. I’m not accusing him, it’s all 100% true. He’s been doing it for four years already. 199.180.167.20 (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An SPA persistently converting a redirect to a wholly inadequately sourced article. Possible suspicions that the SPA may be the article subject.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. There might be some socking going on here as well based on the page history. I'd suggest asking a WP:checkuser to have a look. No need for page protection to deal with a single disruptive user. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there have been significant developments or new information related to the subject of the article since it was last salted years ago. This include new research, events, or changes in the subject's career or achievements. I will ensure the article is well-sourced, using reliable and credible references to support all claims. This will help address any concerns about the article's accuracy or reliability that may have led to its previous protection. In addition, the subject of the article has gained more notability since 2017, and their influence now meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. This could be demonstrated through awards, media coverage, or other indicators of importance. Lloydminster (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a draft that you can point to to help make your argument? Naked promises and platitudes mean nothing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:19, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I have a draft! You are right. Lloydminster (talk) 22:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Create Draft:Abdulrahman Elsamni and submit it through the WP:Articles for creation process. Favonian (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Thank you @Favonian Lloydminster (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism over the past three days by the same IP vandal. NJZombie (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP edit warrior active here, does not stop despite being reverted by multiple users. Denniss (talk) 06:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I've issued a formal warning. If they continue, report to ANI or AIV. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I request Administrator to protect this page because of vandalism Saad Ali Khan Pakistan (talk) 08:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I request Administrator to protect this page because of vandalism Saad Ali Khan Pakistan (talk) 08:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is only used for pervasive disruption by multiple users. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 12:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Looks like a single user. I've issued a warning. If this continues report to AIV or ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA enforcement. 216.194.32.123 (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep on adding info based on rumors and/or hoaxes. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 21:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Tone of some recent edits lack a Neutral point of view (NPOV). Also, recent edits rely only on news articles and referencing the person only in the context of a single event. Calmladki (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't look like pervasive disruption. Content disputes should be addressed on the talk page. If one or two editors are engaged in obviously disruptive behavior after being warned, report to AIV or ANI. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High risk of vandalism. India2024 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA enforcement. 216.194.32.123 (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25 November 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – At least 3 instances of repeated vandalism in the past 48 hour period. Johnnie Bob (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA enforcement. 216.194.32.123 (talk) 21:02, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – All IP edits since the last protection expired appear to be from one IP-hopping user who persistently makes "correct" or "true" edits that have never been sourced, and has led to previous protections here. WCQuidditch 21:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IP's persistently engaging in disruptive editing without providing a single source to their claims and continuously edit warring in the article's history. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 20:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Sky Studios' library is completely separate from Annapurna Animation's library, so Blue Sky Studios should not be listed as a predecessor. 2600:1008:B099:A2C7:C0D3:5F32:EDF8:2D8E (talk) 20:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. SuperSkaterDude45 Looks like a single editor operating in a /64 range. As best as I can tell they seem to have stopped. But if this resumes take it to either ANI or AIV. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: In this revision I had already warned the user about their continuous edit warring and with events later transpiring to them using a different ip in the same range. Edits seem to have stopped but it's really only because no one has reverted their edits prior to my recent reversion. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 20:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA - while only a dab page, it does disambiguate between terms covered by the restriction. 216.194.32.123 (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see any need for protection at the moment, I would estimate the risk of disruption as low.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per Ymblanter. It's a disambiguation page. Come on. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: an IP user User:120.29.86.15 and another sockpuppet account User:120.29.86.91 keeps vandalizing said page and claiming many countries didn't start color broadcasting for peripheral stations until the 1980's-1990's without any sources to back them up whatsoever at all. I would recommend a semi-protection, blocking users without an account (IP accounts) from editing and only allowing logged in users with an account. CD967119 (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined User warned. If disruptive editing continues after suitable warnings, report to AIV or ANI as appropriate. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81ngel_de_Amparo

Reason: High level of IP vandalism/Misinformation by unknown party. An unknown party has been trying to alter (without evidence to prove their stance) the name of the structure creator

2603:9000:9200:9187:4C4E:86C3:21F9:7C17 (talk) 02:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Outside of scope: no such article present on the English Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 02:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. — 64andtim (chatsee here) 02:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Galobtter. Protection already expired, however. Favonian (talk) 09:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA protection needed. Marokwitz (talk) 09:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator El C. 21 months ago, in fact. Favonian (talk) 09:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping edit warrior, does not stop despite administrative warnings and reverts by multiple users, even extending vandalism to Puma. Denniss (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent IP user(s) deleting maintenance template with a poor reason Alexeyevitch(talk) 12:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is no instance of vandalism found. Protection is unnecessary. Also, there is a need to update the page information ....... . India2024 (talk) 05:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Mohammed Zubair (journalist) is not protected. Favonian (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there is no risk of vandalism. Additionally, there is requirement for updating the existing information. The page contains outdated information....... . India2024 (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page's protection was a discretionary sanction for the Indian Subcontinent topic area. Since it predates the change in procedure earlier this year, it has to be challenged at Clarification and Amendment or at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement as an appeal. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 09:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:OpIndia is not protected. Favonian (talk) 09:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 23:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC) 23:26, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 15:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continually Vandalised by IPs. See Revision History. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 01:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Over 35 vandalised revisions in just the last 5 days. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 02:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... IanDBeacon (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits for last month have been reverts. Nswix (talk) 12:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I feel like this would normally warrant pending protection, given the pace of vandalism, however, in consideration of the actual content of the questionable edits semi-protection may be warranted. Chetsford (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 12:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 12:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, particularly in terms of NPOV edits, incitement to hatred against specific groups of people and unsourced information Borgenland (talk) 13:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Page is under WP:ARBPIA, as said on the talk page. OutsideNormality (talk) 02:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of edits changing him to prime minister. IP users are prematurely changing it. He will be sworn in on the 27/11/23 DMY NZDT, so it can have protection till a couple of days after this. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Users keep on reverting majority/minority and without that info the party infobox is useless and you can't figure out anything from it. Octilllion (talk) 16:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-confirmed protection: Persistent unsourced and unexplained changes to the single release dates. It's been going on for a while now. It seems the user is using different IPs to perform the same edits so blocking them doesn't do anything. Bowling is life (talk) 23:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive IP edits, consisting of insertion of promotional material or generally unencyclopedic content. Protection has been declined before. Filing a second request due to the frequent and continuing nature of said edits. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 02:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Uptick in disruptive mangling Top5a (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism, please see [148]

They have used more than a dozen IPs to create 20+ topics across both Talk:Noktundo and Talk:List of Territorial Disputes Sunnyediting99 (talk) 05:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The article is about a Hindu temple, which has a high level of risk of blasphemy. India2024 (talk) 05:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: sock puppetry Magherbin (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced birth date changes. Waxworker (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: keeps getting vandalized very fast GlobalReference221 (talk) 18:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:ARBPIA BilledMammal (talk) 09:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The vandalism had been made by registered users before. May I request a higher level of protection? Only for the structure part and political groups on the right as they are high risk. If I'm correct we have template protection for that Octilllion (talk) 17:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of set of sockpuppetry, disruptions, edit warring, etc, Jingiby (talk) 19:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level IP vandalism/edit warring. Past 2 months of various IPs trying to maintain WP:BOOSTERISM material. GuardianH (talk) 19:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection. As soon as the last semi-protection expired, the anon who keeps slapping {{fringe theory}} on it showed up again. Blocked already at one IP address, but they'll be right back from another.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  19:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Various editors keep trying to pretend that the name wasn't permanently changed three years ago. For the past three weeks, they have been changing the name back to "Civil War".   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing viral lawsuit, YouTubers involved. Some vandalism appearing alongside untidy (good faith) edits as the situation evolves 2402:FF00:E101:3D00:0:0:0:1CDB (talk) 08:47, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip's adding different names. All unreferenced. Some Google searches result in fan names. Knitsey (talk) 20:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

26 November 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism despite being shown over 20 references sources, the person in question doing this vandalization "SarajevMoska", is also trying to use just 1 source as reference, which the source itself claims that the source might be invalid. TRAVERA1 (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also indefinitely extended-confirmed protected the article and logged it at WP:GS/KURD. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 20:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism and BLP violations. Article has been protected four times this year. Charcoal feather (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:28, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unexplained removal of sourced content and addition of unsourced material. Mr. Komori (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I warned the IP editor as well. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA, since the reason it was unusued is due to the conflict . 47.19.68.110 (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would decline, no current disruption and it is unclear why the disruption would come now.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Disruption is not needed per WP:ARBPIA, because any non-extended confirmed user making an edit would violate the rules. If any non-extended confirmed user making an edit would be reverted, why leave it open to them? 131.239.89.162 (talk) 15:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of Among us related vandalism after it was unprotected. Subariba (talk) 17:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:30, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: History of unconstructive editing, likely to increase over time. Orchastrattor (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA. 12.74.238.80 (talk) 22:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Page deleted. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar Formula One car articles

Reason: Continued edits against Formula One WikiProject convention and introduction of links to disambiguation pages by an IP-hopping editor. DH85868993 (talk) 09:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edition war by unidentified, persistent IP account because of political reasons, using unreliable far-right media as sources. Requesting basic protection to only allow addition to registered accounts. MaeseLeon (talk) 00:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs vandalizing this page. Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 01:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like this is caused by fans of a streamer: https://www.twitch.tv/sidneyeweka Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 01:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism both by IP's and registered editors, would recommend changing protections to semi. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 03:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. PCP turned off as it would be pointless with semi. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – repeated disruptive edits from IPs. ScienceFlyer (talk) 03:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 02:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Biographies of living persons JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 02:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep on adding unsourced content [149] [150] [151]. The IP range had added the same content in the past. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:4071:2380:B07C:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism.

This page and the old lemma were already protected eight time in the past 4 years. And only a couple of days after the last unprotection the vandalism of IP's started again .

The comment of User:El C of the last protection which summaries it very well. "reset pc. Note: while the _activity_ is within pc, the pattern is: several edits per month by nonconfirmed users get reverted at (or near) 100 percent, for months and months (possibly years)"

Could you please add an indefinite semi-protection of this page, because there is no improvement in sight. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, as, in theory this should only be updated yearly, when a new list comes out.
Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated unsourced additions from IP editors that also don't follow MOS:CAPS. Joeyconnick (talk) 02:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 96.58.139.46 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mario Wiki. Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 03:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – hasn't been created in over sixteen years, and pages are not protected preëmptively. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 13:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. Marokwitz (talk) 13:43, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 13:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article is facing excessive destructive edits by several sock puppet accounts. The religious structure the article is most commonly referred to as the "Imam Ali Shrine", and the Wikipedia article has always been named "Imam Ali Shrine" or "Imam Ali Mosque" for the past 20 years. Please return the articles name to its original title. After the title is reverted to it's original title, I recommend to temporarily lock the page from editing to prevent repetitive vandalism. Goudarz.memar (talk) 15:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – Strictly speaking the wrong venue, but I've moved the page back to the original name as a revert of sock disruption. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but vandalism since last PP lapsed. Nswix (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruption and edit warring, refusing to use talk page. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued Vandalism by IPs; See Revision History Please note:

Semi-protected Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs keep on adding unsourced content [152] [153] [154] [155]. Yesterday, I requested for the same, the IP was blocked but the page wasn't protected. Today another IP added the same content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent target of vandalism over the last few hours. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit warring. Redtree21 (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks by User:ScottishFinnishRadish, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in the last few hours. Please could it be protected so no other disruptive edits can be made? Thank you. Zippo9310 (talk) 12:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term IP vandalism and addition of unsourced content. Skitash (talk) 18:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 120 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Normally this would be more appropriate for Pending Changes, but the pace of problematic IP edits is too brisk to encumber the PC patrollers with this. The last protection period was for 90 days, so I guess we can try 120 days and see if that helps. The next stop is probably a year, I suppose. Chetsford (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent and repeated IP vandalism and sockpuppetry in the past year with persistent edit wars (i.e., Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheepman2099/Archive). The page has been granted semi-protection twice before such issues, and after the protection ends the accounts reappear with no signs of stopping. GuardianH (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 180 days 90 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not seeing any evidence that the page has previously been protected. If I've missed something, let me know. Sorry, it appears there is a history of protection. Given that, a more robust period of protection is warranted and I've increased this from 90 to 180 days. Moreover, the problematic editor is blocked as of today. That said, given the depth of sockpuppetry involved, a modest period of protection to disrupt the almost-certain regeneration of new socks would not be unwarranted. I don't think such a period of protection would be preemptive as it's part of an ongoing epoch of disruption on this article, albeit disruption over what appears to be very, very minor issues. Chetsford (talk) 19:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC); edited 19:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 16:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editwarring on release dates. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Sockpuppetry. I suspect sock puppetry by an editor who goes by the name SolomontheMagnifico. He was recently blocked indefinitely due to issues relating to this very page. PadFoot2008 (talk) 10:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:CT/A-I 69.116.96.17 (talk) 16:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey , Balai page is very controversial specially on the offline or news level. there are many myths are found on various page on search browser regarding this community . This page is relented with group of Hindus who facing discrimination on ground level that's why this page needs an kind of protection to protect the information and sovereignty of the people of the community. Ashokkbhalse (talk) 17:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Chetsford (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

27 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A spate of page-hijacking vandalism from various IPs. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: appears to be a series of bad jokes related to this news story. It'll probably subside after a couple of days but, as of a few minutes ago, remains a problem. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Geni. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. An LTA targeted this page by adding defamatory content. – 64andtim (talk to me!) 23:31, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, adding of inappropriate material DementiaGaming (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Aoidh (talk) 00:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive IP's changing the lead similarly to an edit done by a sock that was reverted on November 7. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:53, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 00:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This template gets recursively transcluded in most mammal taxoboxes, and could be redirected by any IP to have every placental mammal's taxobox (humans, cats, elephants, ...) display as, say, plants in a shiny green color. That's around 6000 articles, many of them pretty important, that could be affected by a single IP change.

Same for Template:Taxonomy/Eutheria (its immediate parent), and, in the therian-to-mammal ladder, Template:Taxonomy/Prototribosphenida, Template:Taxonomy/Theriiformes and Template:Taxonomy/Theriimorpha are unprotected, with the others being semi-protected. Skips aren't used below the class level, so all of these end up called in every single therian taxobox. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 01:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done: TE'd the unprotected ones, but fwiw Template:Taxonomy/Placentalia was already TE'd TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 01:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The lock didn't show up so I was confused, sorry! ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 01:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Part of Israel-Hamas War Zinderboff 14:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Israel-Palestine conflict: the letter partially covers bin Laden's views on it. Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 16:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP block evasion. 71.125.62.17 (talk) 19:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP block evasion. 71.125.62.17 (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP block evasion. 71.125.62.17 (talk) 19:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:47, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from accounts that are either newly made or edits without an account to change the place of origin of the dish. I have attempted to revert it provided sources yet the accounts are just changing the place of origin without adding any sources. (They are changing it to Saudi Arabia)

In fact, a new wikipedia account (AArabHistory) was made specifically to change it.

Thanks Amir Abdullah (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since November 21, persistent vandalism by a variety of IPs and new accounts, to add distinctly non-notable person. signed, Willondon (talk) 23:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Name dispute. نعم البدل (talk) 23:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of continued IP vandalism and slow-moving edit wars. 2601:8C0:A83:87F0:8FC:C52F:BD6:CB37 (talk) 01:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism less than a week after the *three year* semi expired. HouseBlastertalk 02:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 04:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC) 04:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent WP:NOTFORUM violations; almost nothing constructive in the page history. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:14, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last non-autoconfirmed edit was nearly a week ago, on 21 November. The other comment you removed today was from 31 August. Talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have occurred twice in two days; without a more frequent pattern being present, this can be addressed without protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, as it's been over a day since the vandalism and it hasn't returned. Before 26 November, no unconstructive edits for months and months. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please raise the protection level of the sejm page. Registered user has taken it upon himself to still keep on reverting majority/minority as if his life depended on it and so semi-protection won't help. Octilllion (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that but user also keeps on shortening names of parties (some of which don't even have official shortenings) and this has never been the case for the previous sejm pages.
Please make a higher level of protection for 2 weeks this troll keeps on going back to his exact version of the wiki page removing all changes made by others as well. Octilllion (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You should discuss this with the user and not asking for extending protection. We do not protect articles against one user. Ymblanter (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per Ymblanter's comment. - Aoidh (talk) 01:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would add to this that the reporting user created the account less than a month ago while the user complained of has been editing for two years or so. I do not yet draw or infer any conclusions from that. But when they made a similar complaint to AIV I declined it as a content dispute (a category we rarely invoke over there) and suggested the editors get busy using the article talk page rather than edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Admins are getting paid to change this Article and users are blocked who try to edit this page. Beautifulwriter95 (talk) 21:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Reporting editor blocked indefinitely as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism in recent days. Concerned that some IP vandalism remained in the article for over 12 hours until removed by the editor John M Baker. Long protection history due to persistent vandalism. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advising perhaps pending changes, as there is a surprising amount of good-faith edits by IPs in the history, and disruption is generally quite spaced out. This hasn't been protected since 2019. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. as noted above, really. If a lot of IPs are contributing constructively, I'm not even sure PC would be productive. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same edits as IPs before, changing an upcoming film to be the new Sonic, multiple attempts to tell them to stop, multiple reverts, same behavior. LADY LOTUSTALK 01:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:8001:B4F0:7750:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Canada-based IP-hopper who has been vandalizing NASCAR-related articles since 2022. Areaseven (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP block evasion, with personal attacks mixed in as well. 108.58.9.194 (talk) 19:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that you linked to the redirect, which hasn't been edited in over a decade. So I had to presume you'd made a mistake. Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: We need to add contents to the college page and the page doesnt allow us to add any new content Nayakadi (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Although this request isn't necessarily to protect a page and though I am also an editor just currently using IP but there is and ongoing edit war in the article. Iam not certain but the user Ithinkusergoeshere may seem to go the way of WP:SPASOCK, so can anyine confirm whether he is a genuine user. 182.183.20.126 (talk) 10:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined This hasn't risen to the level of disruption where it would need protection; pray continue discussion on the pertaining talk-page, and try to get a third opinion, as @Bishonen: has rightly suggested. Lectonar (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that. It's just that I am suspecting Ithinkusergoeshere to be a Sockpuppet. 182.183.20.126 (talk) 12:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, keeps changing IP address to avoid blocking Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:b07:ae5:e471::/64 (talk · contribs). Also 93.38.65.110. Favonian (talk) 11:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. MacAddct1984 (talk | contribs) 15:26, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User siriaeve has engaged in an edit war by repeatedly deleting the well-sourced content contributed by others and reverting. Accura9 (talk) 15:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Accusing others of edit-warring is risky business. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing this November. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator 331dot. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: unnecessary protection, no vandalism has been observed Arasakacorp (talk) 10:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: as protecting admin. My 2 cents: there was disruption by IPs up until semi-protection was implemented. I see no reason to unprotect, as protection will expire tomorrow anyway. Lectonar (talk) 14:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotectedFavonian (talk) 16:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think they have said something on Twitter. Ip and new account vandalism, some WP:BLP issues. Knitsey (talk) 13:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --LDM2003 talk to me! 19:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:41, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing by both registered users and IP's. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 21:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

28 November 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Mathiasrex passed away, vide [156]. Teukros (talk) 20:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Materialscientist (talk) 23:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced edits by LTA. HorrorLover555 (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 23:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent events has increased vandalism on the page. WanderingMorpheme 11:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 20:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SlopeInterceptorTalk 14:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 20:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Short description is well-sourced but users are persistently moving or censoring information due to personal bias Riker7193 (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem.. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to recent event ArticleAddiction (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 00:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Vandalisam Saad Arshad Butt (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 23:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: List of Pakistanis by net worth is semi-protected for one month. The redirect is semi'd for one week. Joyous! Noise! 00:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-blocked user Defeedme still using IP addresses to disrupt article. No other IPs besides the blocked user have recently edited the article. IP range has been reported. Wes sideman (talk) 15:08, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased levels of vandalism, brought about due to increased media coverage of a recent performance. Narom (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:44, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits by blocked sockpuppet IPs. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are back at it. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 16:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long page semi-protection request. See history page. Too many edits out of practice by users with own preferences, not following the standard for this articles. Thanks. Island92 (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SahilGupta-Sahil. Uhai (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High levels of IP disruptive editing, due to rivalry name change. glman (talk) 01:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 03:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should keep it under control through the end of the NFL season. Also left CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by both registered users and IP's would recommend temporary semi protection. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 104.222.93.58 (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing this month. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 01:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked blocked by Antandrus. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism which prompted previous protection has immediately resumed following the lifting of that protection. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary of one vandal (though frankly could just be one guy with proxies) indicates there's off-wiki coordination of vandalism of the page. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Apparent promotional content / original research systematically added and restored by several WP:SPA who don't engage in discussions otherwise. See Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_95#Ergodicity_economics PaulT2022 (talk) 14:52, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Aretwodeetwo (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case., User(s) blocked: BenjaminSkjold (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Both indef as NOTHERE. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Amidon Reis (talk) 21:09, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. After the one flareup this afternoon, the editors began discussing it on the talk page (Not very well, but as Churchill said better jaw-jaw than war-war) Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalism JustYourImaginaryGuy (talk) 04:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 04:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced content. Sjö (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 08:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is semi protected and I am unable to expand the page further. 102.132.215.62 (talk) 05:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. That page does not seem to be protected. If you're having trouble editing it, let me know what error message you're receiving. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to add more context when it comes to ofrendas. Specifically adding the tiers ofrendas are often known for. I created the following paragraph which could be used as a basic structure for what the text could look like: During Dia de los Muertos, altars are often composed of three tiers; the top tier will often contain photographs of the remembered deceased and religious statues or symbols; often among these photographs there is a picture of La Virgen Guadalupe. The second tier contains ofrendas, and these ofrendas often vary from person to person; factors such as age, personal experiences, and preferences help to decide the ofrendas. Moreover, the second tier of the altar is far more personal, and most of the ofrendas are a thoughtful selection for the remembered deceased. Noteworthy care is given to this layer by those creating the ofrendas, giving well-due thought to the things the perished loved throughout their lifetimes. The third tier contains candles and occasionally a washbasin and towel, symbolically allowing spirits to refresh upon arrival at the altar. LiamMoore1 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Day of the Dead is not protected. Favonian (talk) 08:14, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Someone using the username Nandini.medanta (from the company itself) is trying to change the page by adding promotional text. Notedolly2 (talk) 08:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Page protection recently expired and vandalism immediately resumed.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Last word of the introduction: true >> truce (minor spelling error driving me nuts, of course also okay if someone else corrects it in my stead) Barefoot Banana (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! It's  Done WillowCity(talk) 16:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting page protection as an unconfirmed user seems to continually be vandalizing. Comintell (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by trolls, misusing sources. AoE100 (talk) 06:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One spike of disruption by the same IP on the 27th. Lectonar (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Death date keeps being added to the infobox, and with recent attention from Reddit, there is reason to believe this will continue for a little while. GSK (talkedits) 15:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Will be logged under WP:CT/BLP. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - likely to continue since the subject of the article is in the news Southdevonian (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: NFL referee. Multiple vandalism edits. News articles] and twitter mentions Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 11:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. Joyous! Noise! 18:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – recent uptick in disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This user other IP has been vandalizing page and false information on page. Proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=CoryxKenshin&diff=prev&oldid=1187013615 Bonthefox3 (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 18:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.  StarScream1007  ►Talk  18:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 20:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rumors resulting in increased vandalism. Troutfarm27 (Talk) 19:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent unregistered user vandalism noticed  yanka  AD  =Talk= 12:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 18:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. ✠ ZenDragoX✠ (contact) 13:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 18:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Killarnee (talk) 13:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Declining for now: it looks like most of the IPs have been blocked. Please bring this back if the trouble picks up again. Joyous! Noise! 18:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after protections expired in October. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 18:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked again after recent protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 20:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing continues after protections expired. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism RowanJ LP2 (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 18:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent sockpuppetry. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 14:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User continues to reinsert content which is not in the original source: [157] [158] [159]. Zenomonoz (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

29 November 2023

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA enforcement. Marokwitz (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 22:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has a recent history of vandalism, most likely due to the subject being taught in schools. Would recommend at least temporarily semi protecting the page. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 20:13, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 18:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC) 18:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 20:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA 69.116.96.128 (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 20:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. That Tired Tarantula (talk) 15:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 20:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. When disruption is coming from mostly one IP, please report the problem to WP:AIV Joyous! Noise! 20:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 00:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't see it until after, so : Already protected by administrator Fox. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 00:16, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Going back a month or so it appears to be only disruptive edits from IPs or non-autoconfirmed users with several already this month so requesting a month semi protection. S0091 (talk) 22:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of spam links (almost every edit since the page was unprotected in March) Johnj1995 (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 01:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised over the past few days by multiple users. Thriftycat TalkContribs 00:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 01:29, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA BLP. Marokwitz (talk) 11:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. --Orgullomoore (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent run of promotional vandalism from IPs and WP:SPAs. Amigao (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Joyous! Noise! 01:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA - this isn't just in the topic area, but the attention that it gets is overwhelmingly related to WP:WESTBANK style edits that are in the topic area. nableezy - 02:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC) 02:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Not involved; dispute between two editors and no discussion initiated, see ANI report for details. Jerium (talk) 17:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As both of the users involved are extended-confirmed, only full or template protection will force discussion. Is that what you want? Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: Or we could block them from the template for a week, although I'd prefer not to leave it on their block records unless that's the only choice we have. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template protection might help; it would prevent the editor who started it from editing. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC) Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism - Recommend semi protection. DDMS123 (talk) 01:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 02:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism - Recommend semi protection. DDMS123 (talk) 01:38, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 02:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 08:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous edit warring by the same IP range [despite previously being blocked over it] within the past few days. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 10:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:1008:B099:A2C7:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for two weeks this time, so we don't have to worry about keeping out IPs who want to contribute productively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP edit warring. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also invoke WP:ARBEE restrictions as needed. --IanDBeacon (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nobody's edited at all for a couple of days. However, I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Request indefinite increase in PP as vandalism and disruptive edits reappeared immediately after the last protection expired. Raladic (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 01:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There literally was more disruption right after you declined. Please re-review. Raladic (talk) 03:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined A semi-protection would not have prevented the edit you are referring to. There have only been 4 non-productive edits since the previous protection expired more than a week ago. Joyous! Noise! 04:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Since August, anon IPs have been vandalising the page with incorrect information. LibStar (talk) 04:39, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 1 year page protection (for disruptive editing) ended within the last week, 5 IPs + 1 new account made disruptive edits within the last day or so. ScienceFlyer (talk) 07:27, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:10, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Continually vandalised about the Jailer movie's gross figures by users who just got autoconfirmed. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:06, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically by @Agathiyar654; See Version history 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 08:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Agathiyar654 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 72 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Another user @Lokesh balaji qw has started vandalising the page based on same topic. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 06:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Page already has Indefinite Semi-Protecetion (Protection Admin @Courcelles); But, vandalised by autoconfirmed users. Should be Indefinite Extended Confirmed Protected. 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is #2 trending article on Wikipedia. IP vandals are repeatedly changing the short description to say the site is sharing child porn. BBQboffingrill me 05:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Dawkin Verbier (talk) 10:08, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: In recent times, there's been a lot of IP Vandalism. The protection will allow things to cool down and can reevaluate once it expires. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject recently died, but as yet we only have a date of report, not a date of death. IP-hopper repeatedly adding unsourced death date after multiple warnings here and here. Becoming very disruptive. Struway2 (talk) 12:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A request for page protection for the same article was a while back (diff) but disruption has resumed again after it expired. A common characteristic of these IPs who cause the disruption appear to be the unfortunate outcome of an irredendist political climate prevailing in the Republic of Turkey, promoted through the use of WP:FRINGE theories in the country's media, targeting foreign islands and territories. A new but longer or more permanent protection of the article may be needed, considering that a month has passed already and the political situation in Turkey hasn't normalized yet, and is unlikely to be for the foreseeable future. - SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 12:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Apart from the blocked IP, only one instance of disruption since last protection expired. Lectonar (talk) 12:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My appreciation for the staff taking a firm action against the IP. Hopefully this suffices as a clear preventative message.--- SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 13:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a variety of IPs and new accounts signed, Willondon (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New user editwarring. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Numerous different IPs vandalising the article. This article is considered a "good article" by Wikipedia, however, in the last few weeks/month someone is trying to change the article, adding information completely without citation, every day with a different IP, which can also be considered sockpuppet. So I ask that this article can no longer be edited in this way Liimkna (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Politician subject to persistent vandalism from IPs inserting deliberate incorrect information which is contradictory to cited sources in the article. microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 16:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There's been one edit today. The previous ones were from earlier this month and there's only been about a half dozen edits in the last six months. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:42, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing this month by IP"s. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The most recent disruption was by a single IP, which is now blocked. The other edits were over a week ago. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

30 November 2023

Reason: The subject of the article was part of a controversy last month which led to a lot of vandalism from IP addresses on the page. After a previous one month long protection, the problem is persisting after the end of the protection period. I would suggest a longer protection this time Michaeldble (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit-warring/vandalism by IP-hopping user, his actions previously led to a temp protection at Sdkfz 234 article and now he moved his actions here. Denniss (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Joyous! Noise! 19:51, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced material by LTA. HorrorLover555 (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Default011223344 (talk · contribs). Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:CTOP: WP:A/I/PIA. Wikishovel (talk) 17:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. --Orgullomoore (talk) 03:22, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 11:14, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at the page. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA arbitration enforcement. Marokwitz (talk) 12:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:ARBPIA - it literally says You must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days to edit, so no point not EC-ing it. 71.125.62.146 (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pattern of vandalism, first unregistered then new user. el.ziade (talkallam) 13:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Magentic Manifestations (talk) 13:46, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will log at CTOPS as well. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Pending changes not cutting it. BangJan1999 21:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And, again, logged at CTOPS. I don't see why pending changes seemed like a great idea in the first place. For that large subgroup of GENSEX articles which are targets for misgendering/deadnaming (i.e., pretty much all our articles on trans people), it should not be used because, as noted in edit summaries here, it does not deter those vandals. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 02:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged. Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism محرر البوق (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS under ARBHORN Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent addition of weird source, without discussion on talk page first, so I guess kind of an edit war by multiple new editors trying to get the same link in the article. Maybe a short prot would help move the discussion over to the talk page.Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 00:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – No need for IPS to edit this. Moxy- 01:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject recently died, contentious political figure, likely subject to vandalism recentlyryan RecentlyRyan 02:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Maybe it will have to be, but for now it looks alright Daniel Case (talk) 02:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case Not sure if one instance would make you consider move protection, but [160] just happened. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like someone else took care of it (Also, it seems no one involved in this was aware the article is already under indef semi for editing). Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, there's currently no move protection (beyond semi, which is redundant). Also in addition to the page-move vandalism, already one autoconfirmed vandal so far. Only been about 90 minutes since the news broke. Please keep a very, very close eye on this page. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are, or rather were, correct—I have just move-protected it. Tamzin updated it to full within seconds. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already several more autoconfirmed accounts have come out of the woodwork. This isn't going to stop for a while, and the page is probably getting 1000 views per minute, so the there's no chance to revert vandals in time. I think it's time for EC. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also multiple complaints about vandalism on the talk page. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 48 hrs., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Page already indefinitely semi-protected and move protected. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS (I think this patrol through RFPP has set a personal record for most CTOPS-logged actions I've done in one such sweep, and certainly the most topic areas). Daniel Case (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newest target for the vandalism/harassment IP. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 02:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP's. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not for single IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protection is not for single IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Does this article fall under arbitration enforcement for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? I am William Oliver (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, Caleb. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consent addition of unreliable sources and sources that don't back up changed information. Maurice Oly (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem like this is overwhelming the article yet. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism and removal of sourced edits by users disturbing the neutrality of the article. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 01:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing much disruption since the most recent protection expired (granted, that hasn't been very long). If there is, by all means it should be restored, for at least three months this time. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article is currently being heavily edited because its subject has recently died 2600:1700:4384:B230:40B3:BC71:3E2E:14F0 (talk) 02:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

( Peanut gallery comment) No need to protect the redirect I see, but Henry Kissinger, which just had protection declined, should be move-protected IMO. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's been move-protected. I also noted at that report that it's under indef semi already. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This is a redirect no one's edited in a few years. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protection expired vandalism resumed. Will120 (talk) 07:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – came off protection vandalism resumed. Will120 (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I requested protection for the page due to a high amount of vandalism from IP editors and it was granted for 2 days which ends tomorrow. Since the protection was put in place, editors have emerged out of the woodwork who in some instances, haven't edited in 5 years?!? So I don't know whats going on that there's all these dormant editors who suddenly woke up - some sort of sock puppet ring? Who knows but its incredibly suspicious to say the least. In any event. I think it would be a good idea to increase the protection to a month because I fear what will happen if it's lifted tomorrow. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not pre-emptive, I'm asking for what is already in place to be extended. MaskedSinger (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 13:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – 64andtim (talk) 13:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 16:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent edit warring regarding wording about the January 6 United States Capitol attack. Waxworker (talk) 14:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 16:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Vandalism. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Promotional editing from IPv6 editor. Ravensfire (talk) 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2409:40D2:0:0:0:0:0:0/41 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of his Guatemalan nationality in the lead sentence although its use (or lack thereof) has been discussed several times in the article's talk. FrB.TG (talk) 12:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That last occurred four days ago, with the last IP edit being two days ago. Please report again if it recurs. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent uptick in disruptive editing by IP's. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 151.135.192.0/18 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hanoi&diff=prev&oldid=1186492621 This IP has been vandalising title on the page. Bonthefox3 (talk) 14:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. That was a week ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption by IP socks of WP:LTA/ARARAT. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 13:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at the linked page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Joyous! Noise! 16:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeat vandalism from IP addresses. In this case, they are radically decreasing the number of attendees at the March Against Antisemitism and radically increasing the number of attendees at the pro-Palestine rally without providing sources to support the changes. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enforcement of applicable WP:CTOPS restrictions is also advisable. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism by IP-hopping editor, blocking the IP does not help. Denniss (talk) 12:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content from IPs. Xexerss (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article has been the target of vandalism since 14 October; vandals have been particularly active over the past couple of weeks.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not considering this a CTOPS action, but I will be putting a notice on the talk page (It's getting to the point where we might as well preemptively do at least that for all members of the current British Cabinet, even those in positions like Secretary of State For Putting Things On Top of Other Things, even those who wind up holding those positions for a day or two before some embarassing disclosure forces their resignation). Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated removal of COI template and other maintenance templates by a fleet of IP-hopping anonymous IPs and SPAs. The article is most likely UPE, and definitely COI. The repeated removal of the template without consensus is disruptive, and has been going on for quite a while. Please protect. Netherzone (talk) 19:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Nythar (💬-🍀) 20:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of the article keeps reverting and edit warring, which they admit. Nswix (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS tag to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism from a sock. [161] محرر البوق (talk) 20:24, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS under ARBHORN. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, would recommend semi protection. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 20:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – we have a new editor unwilling to communicate with the community. First thing back from the Block doing the same thing. Moxy- 22:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Protection isn't usually for issues with one editor. You might need to get an admin on the case for edit warring. I don't have my bit right now, so I can't do that myself. It does appear to be enough of a problem to warrant at least a short block, or maybe more. Dennis Brown - 09:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done per Dennis Brown's reasoning above, though I did partial block Truong Gia Bao112 from the article.Ponyobons mots 17:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of false information by a series of Polish IPs (37.30.16.58, 37.30.10.59, 37.30.10.65), stretching back over a month. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Level Changed 51.9.222.86 (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 21:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC) 21:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]