User talk:Sub31k

Your submission at Articles for creation: Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade has been accepted

Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gusfriend (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Sub31k, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Because I saw you are working on spaceflight-related articles, I thought the general intro, spaceflight collaboration and the Constellation program pages would be helpful to you. Happy editing! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:21, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi CactiStaccingCrane! I remember coming across you a few times in the past. I'm probably going to be very on-again off-again too. Thanks for the welcome (even if it be misplaced a little in time :)) Sub31k (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Cerulean warbler

Hi there. If you don't mind that I added plenty of at the article, Cerulean warbler, for you to add more refences. Thanks. BloatedBun (talk) 08:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, it's all been covered now. Sub31k (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cerulean warbler

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cerulean warbler you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 23:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cerulean warbler

The article Cerulean warbler you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cerulean warbler for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Artemis program

Hi Sub31k, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Because I saw you are working on spaceflight-related articles, I thought the general intro, spaceflight collaboration and the Artemis program pages would be helpful to you. Happy editing! Starship 24 (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

RfC

There is currently a discussion at Talk:SpaceX Starship regarding a note that a user is repeatedly trying to insert into the "failures" section. The thread is RfC on "clarifying failure in infobox". Thank you. DASL51984 ^{(Speak to me!)} 19:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Blue page :)

Hey,

I saw you removed some of my images that were used under the free copyright standard her on the wiki. Why did you do that? Each picture was my own work because I edited the picture to better present the pictures. Señor Jakob (talk) 01:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Unfortunately, editing an existing, non-free image does not make it an original work.

We may refer to c:Commons:FAQ#Can I upload scans and images of others I modified?, which tells us that we cannot, by editing an image, turn it into an original work. We still require permission from the original creator, which we do not have. I hope this helps make clear why I removed the images. Sub31k (talk) 01:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for deleting the pictures then! I will try to find additional ones that allow posting. Thanks! Señor Jakob (talk) 01:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Good luck and thank you for being on wiki. It makes a difference! Sub31k (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! That means a lot.

Blue Orgin has a page where you can download pictures. They request that you give credit. Would this meet the Wiki standard? https://www.blueorigin.com/news/gallery Señor Jakob (talk) 01:29, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, no. As they are not explicitly freely licensed, they must be assumed to carry copyright. It can be tough to find free media, sometimes, so don't worry if there's not much that meets the criteria. Sub31k (talk) 02:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

I reverted my edit. Sorry about that. Señor Jakob (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Space Launch System core stage

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Space Launch System core stage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Czarking0 -- Czarking0 (talk) 05:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Sub31k for your contribution. It was a pleasure to review your article. Czarking0 (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Sub31k (talk) 20:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sub31k. Thank you for your work on Astra Rocket. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LR89

Hello, Sub31k. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LR89, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LR105

Hello, Sub31k. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LR105, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Comparison of orbital launch systems

Who do you think you are to remover many of my hard-working edits??? Does were perfectly fine and if you have a problem with them, talk to me before reverting. If it isnt clear im reverting ur stupid edits. 109.78.1.85 (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I appreciate and respect your concern.

I made the following changes at Comparison of orbital launch systems:

• Switched image from Falcon Heavy, which is not an especially prolific vehicle (and moreover no longer holds records for most powerful operating) to Soyuz-U, the carrier rocket with the most launches in history (and by a very wide margin).
• Changed notation for reuse from colour-italic scheme to a dedicated column. This way, the tables can be sorted by reusability. Also, it is accessibility-friendly - the failed FL nomination from 2018 mentioned the use of colour as an accessibility concern. If colour use is still desired, the Reuse column can have background-color styles set!

I hope this clarifies why I made my edits. Moreover, I do not believe that I removed any content or contributions by you, nor did I revert any changes published by anyone other than myself.

Additionally, I could not have talked to you prior to today, as your IP contribs page doesn't show any activity before yesterday. Sub31k (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Wow! I am impressed, thank you. 109.78.1.85 (talk) 16:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sub31k. Thank you for your work on Blue Ring. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:08, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Gruimorphae

As far as I know, only Prum et al. (2015) recovered Aequorlitornithes, and the Gruimorphae clade of Jarvis et al. (2014) also appear in Kuhl et al, (2021) and there are possible intermediate fossils like Nahmavis. I think that it will be more plausible for the moment to leave Gruimorphae as the main clade. --Ornithodiez (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I've already removed Aequorlitornithes and set the parent of Charadriiformes to Neoaves, following Braun and Kimball (2021) in interpreting Charadriiformes as part of an unresolved polytomy at the base of Aves. We've seen that the confidence of Gruimorphae is weak, as are those of other charadriiform affinities, so the Neoaves parent also reflects the low confidence of any placement. Let me know what you think.

Sub31k (talk) 16:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Perhaps letting the classification reflect that both Charadriiformes and Gruiformes are part, for the moment, of an unresolved polytomy, with only Neoaves as a certainty. --Ornithodiez (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Yep! Hopefully this is a satisfactory arrangement. Sub31k (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm goign to do the same for Gruiformes. --Ornithodiez (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

OOPS - I just remembered that both Charadriiformes and Gruiformes are part of a clade exclusive of Columbaves (and also various other clades depending on the phylogeny), and that the confusion takes place within this clade often in comparison to at Neoaves. Passerea is the name often given to this group. Is it worth considering? Sub31k (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

References

Taxobox

Yes, it's a pleasure to help. I was going to leave a notification on this page for you after I had a little something to eat. One of several reasons why it was better to move the taxobox page is because the misspelled page is template protected. By moving the page, the protection follows the page move and the new page is also protected. That's just one of several reasons why it's better to do a page move in cases like this. Thank you for your help with Wikipedia! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for undertaking the move. I'll make sure to follow these guidelines in the future. Have a great day! Sub31k (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Happy to help! Paine  18:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:LR89

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:LR89, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Sub31k,

I deleted this draft as a test because after six months, it was a blank page. If you'd like to write a draft article, feel free to recreate it or let me know and I can restore the page for you. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:LR105

Hello, Sub31k. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LR105".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)