Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2023/06

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023

01 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 13:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:07, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.  Lefcentreright  Discuss  18:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Gross BLP violations, assume it will die down after not too longer but recommending based on severity of the violations. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content continued after past protection expired. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/92.14.216.40/Archive#19 May 2023. They are very aggressive on the talk page and they keep coming. I prefer this last until we enter 2024. MarioJump83 (talk) 03:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Almost the rest of the year. Daniel Case (talk) 01:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/92.14.216.40/Archive#19 May 2023. These IPs frequently edit the page to add what they want, most lately without discussion. MarioJump83 (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of seven months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is the rest of the year. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. -Lemonaka‎ 23:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is my second request for 30/500 protection. High level of disruptive editing and vandalism from IP addresses. It is frustrating to revert back and restore the article. The person in the article is a powerful Indian criminal politician currently in the mainstream news for sexual assault allegations by top Olympians. Neurofreak (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I.e., the protection I had meant to impose in January. ECP is not necessary when the disruptive editors are primarily IPs; semi- takes care of them. If you feel ECP might be necessary on an article, go to the contribs page of the disruptive editors and check under "user rights management" to see if "auto-confirmed" is checked. Only then would ECP be necessary (And if "extended confirmed" is checked, then we need to consider talking about a partial block). Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous IP vandalism. S.A. Julio (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism James (TC) • 19:0305:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase in IP vandalism over the past few days, keeps on blanking the page from various different IP addresses. Could you put in a short page protection, hopefully they will get bored and move on. Equine-man (talk) 05:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism and addition of press speculation by numerous IPs to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Most edits since November 2022 have been socks adding the same promotional content. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor repeatedly removing sourced content, talk page messages from multiple editors have been ignored. Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2606:A800:C481:5400:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Also ...
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from IPs and newly registered user(s). Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article is no longer on the Main Page; disruption seems to have stopped several hours ago when its TFA period ended. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, especially in the last month James (TC) • 19:0305:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems like the editors are taking care of business. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 00:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: This was quickly taken out of draft when moved in total disregard to the procedure. gidonb (talk) 01:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Article has been deleted; it doesn't seem like it will be recreated soon. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs are repeatedly vandalizing the statistics on the cities and towns and as such they do not correspond to the source mentioned. Cleanup over and over again is tedious. Zaheen (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry from WP:LTA/HOY, to be more specific. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 03:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Constantly being re-created with the same nonsense by an anon editor. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected For good measure, article protected as well. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random removal of content by IP addresses SurferSquall (talk) 03:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit more than a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: With Russian claim of sinking the ship, it is unverified by other sources. Lots of changes by by IP addresses Ceriy (talk) 04:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wikipedialuva (talk) 06:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range keeps on removing Faizabad entry, as well as modifying the WP:COMMONNAME/article names [1] [2] [3] [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Lectonar (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3 members (Chen, Baekhyun, Xiumin) has left the company ItzChiro26 (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Please make an edit request on article talk; remember to provide reliable sources, though. Lectonar (talk) 11:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/LB2 vandalism. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 12:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant removal of sourced content from POV pursuing reasons, by SPA IP's (and maybe socks give the range). Slatersteven (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meena are not sub-group of bhils . kindly remove it because there no evidence Mohnish123 (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No sources provided; the statement is currently cited with Sezgin, Yuksel (2011). Human Rights and Legal Pluralism. ISBN 9783643999054. Lectonar (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AayatS. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/LB2 vandalism. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 12:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated instances of minor vandalism, becoming more serious. Lithopsian (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Meena are not sub-group of bhils . kindly remove it because there no evidence Mohnish123 (talk) 13:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No sources provided; the statement is currently cited with Sezgin, Yuksel (2011). Human Rights and Legal Pluralism. ISBN 9783643999054. Lectonar (talk) 14:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. The page has been protected for this reason before, but today there has been continued vandalism. Sizewell (talk) 09:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Maybe a longer semi could be nice - Piermark came back as soon as the page was unprotected. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 17:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. --Karim talk to me :)..! 17:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 17:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of LTA disruption (Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky). If I counted correctly, only four of the eighteen non-autoconfirmed edits made since the last period of semi-protection expired have been non-MJH related. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite the addition of an edit notice IP editors are still using the talk page to attempt communication with YG entertainment. Lightoil (talk) 06:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. There have been repeated attempts to change the "Years active" in the infobox and include editor interpretations of a song lyric in the article, which goes against the current consensus. There are plenty of edit notices in the relevant places stating that this should not be done, but this has been a persistent issue. Requesting temporary protection as this issue is likely to resolve itself with some kind of official announcement within the next year or so. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted by tendentious IP editor on highly dynamic range for more than a week. – Fut.Perf. 12:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs adding poorly sourced content. CT55555(talk) 13:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page as I have a feeling this is not the last time we may have to consider protecting this page over this and other issues. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism Lattechicken (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Multiple revision reversals. 2605:59C8:4BC:3F10:B9F7:9BBA:A2A0:999B (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An editor has been using multiple sockpuppets to add unsourced information claiming Israel is a majority German speaking nation. see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hornyguy8000. Agentdoge (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The use of “fair” in the “Light skin” page is of racist usage used as positive bias towards light skin, while “deep skin” was not eligible for use in the “Dark skin” page despite common usage in society.

For the fragile “editors”, I’ll refer you to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_bias_on_Wikipedia

Not an accusation when it’s true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:23ee:19f8:84ef:ecbf:7a51:e461:a95b (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – You have already initiated a discussion on the article talk page, which is where it belongs. Favonian (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And the intentionally-inflammatory requests do you absolutely no favours. You can make your case without implying racism is the core reason, or calling editors "fragile", or using scarequotes. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 17:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ip vandalism + will likely increase when the finals are underway HappyBoi3892 (talk) 03:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 17:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs editor also active at Libreboot where AfD template was removed. Ping Discospinster. Yae4 (talk) 03:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 17:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: some changeable IPs are constantly removing referenced biographical details about her second marriage. And adding themselves unsourced details about Lalla Latifa and messing the layout of the page AvaBrandon2000 (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 196.65.192.0/19 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 3 months, per other IP ranges that seem to have been used for this or similar purposes. They've been the only ones editing disruptively recently; let's see what effect this has. If other IP ranges are used, or accounts are created, yes, semi-protection may be necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Blocked User:Akaora repeatedly editing as IP, reverted by various editors, has today made two separate copyvios on this page. Any advice (or action) on dealing with this persistent problematic and block-evading editor welcome. (See eg today's User talk:2A02:1388:2181:46B3:0:0:DBF8:6F19 for editor being warned about copyvio, apologising and requesting unblock, before committing second copyvio, or my talk today User talk:NebY#Reasons why deleting Content and previously eg User talk:NebY#Hermes, User talk:NebY#Kuraokami, User talk:NebY#Question for attempts to explain problems. Persephone is partially protected because of them.) NebY (talk) 14:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant removal of sourced content from POV pursuing reasons, by SPA IP's (and maybe socks give the range). Slatersteven (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 185.234.68.64/28 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours, as well. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: My talk page is being attacked by a stupid vandal sockpuppet. Catfurball (talk) 21:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

02 June 2023

Reason: Consensus was reached on the talk page as to what edits should be made to the fleet table, multiple users are going around that and removing reliably sourced content again and again, which is a pain to fix every 6 hours or so. SurferSquall (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Be warned, though, that if I were reviewing this as a report there I would be inclined to block you. You haven't violated 3RR, but over the last couple of days you have repeatedly reverted others by saying consensus hasn't been reached on the edits you've made. In my experience that has gotten people blocked. If you believe you are so right, it's better to bring it to the dispute resolution noticeboard or ask for knowledgable editors on the appropriate project talk pages than keep edit warring. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism RafaelTLS (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been approximately 30 edits in the past few days; a lot of them seem to be reverts between users including unregistered accounts. Some of the edits from registered users seem to appear to violate WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFFERY. Wozal (talk) 22:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Yeah, that’s a mess. Courcelles (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page hasn't been vandalized got a very long time, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. 80.134.148.226 (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – There was a lot of vandalism prior to protection. Protection works! Favonian (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple WP:NOTAFORUM violations over the past few weeks. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – I'm afraid it's come to this. Various IPs making very similar, uncited/incorrect edits have been disrupting this article for far too long. I don't know what else to do besides request an indef. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 19:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Pride Month is here and the page is attracting vandals. Admins might want to semi-protect until the month is over.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant disruptive edits by IP. Linkin Prankster (talk) 16:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I'm looking into this one. Looks like a range of IP addresses, but it will take me a bit of time to get through it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2600:4040:2810:d000::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Quinlan. Blocked for 2 weeks based on the duration of the activity (started on May 19th), the /64 appears to be a single editor making related disruptive edits, they have been warned on talk pages on at least two occasions, and they are repeatedly remaking edits after they have been reverted (WP:WAR). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism related to a New York Mets win?. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 23:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 04:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It hasn't been edited and i want to add something about Catwoman's casting. i put it on the talk page, but no one has replied 201.188.149.37 (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: No indication of problematic posts The user name has been blacklisted (talk) 03:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive edits of the WP:STABLE version by newly created users [5] [6] [7]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More diffs [8] - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. On-going name change LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 06:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Michaeldble (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:57, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – A lot of ip's have been adding unsourced content to Adam Sandler filmography, this has been going on since March 2023. Untamed1910 (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Insertion of an unsourced date of death of this public figure by newly registered user. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – anonymous users engaging in edit-warring. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 00:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Has been created and speedily deleted four times now, mainly due to unambiguous promotion. Needs to be salted. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:24, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. This was last created in 2021. The two recent recreations were by a now-blocked user. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 07:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Must move Haarika and Hassine Creations to this. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Chetsford: That title has a lot of bad history, and this new article was created just a few days ago in contravention of the previous AFD. However, this new version looks pretty good and has no resemblance to the deleted version under the protected name. I'm notifying you because you're the protecting administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Stale...OP: you could bring this up at deletion review; listed purpose 3. might be fitting. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent block evasion and disruption. Please see this SPI archive - [9]. This user is now vandalizing the page 1987 Lalru bus massacre. Please protect both pages. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 01:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection for 8 months – This article has always had a consistent flow of vandalism from IP and unconfirmed users, and it probably won't go away until the game releases. I'd give it 8 months just to be safe; we can always end its protection prematurely if it overstays its welcome. – Treetoes023 (talk) 05:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Perennial HoY target. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 06:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The redirect is being persistently removed by an editor now engaged in block evasion. Since this is a redirect to an established page, there is little need for anyone to edit it. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Always same IP. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 06:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It was protected in February 2017 (over 6 years ago because of sockpuppetry). Not sure exact situation but a long time has passed and the article hasn't been updated as a result of the protection 2601:42:900:BEF0:FD4C:48BF:451F:DB05 (talk) 15:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rlendog: as protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I unprotected it. Hopefully the previous disruption will not recur. Rlendog (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unprotected For the bot. Courcelles (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism AideDésintéressée (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of IP vandalism today for no apparent reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: BLP Policy Violations. Previously protected for BLP violations and apparent COI editing; issues have reappeared days after protection expiry. Actualcpscm (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some users keep adding speculations to this page. 99.209.40.250 (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism of a BLP, who has been in the news for her strong pro-transgender rights stances. Unknown-Tree (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I requested that this page be protected earlier this week due to sockpuppetry (see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky. An administrator blocked the most recent IP sock instead of protecting the page, which was reasonable; however, the sockmaster continues to evade their block by jumping IPs. I am requesting semi-protection as an alternative means to prevent disruption. This article in particular is a long-term target; see the protection log for history. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 06:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Spicy. for 2 months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change Dnieper into Dnipro. Our main riever is called DNIPRO in Ukrainian, Dnieper is in russian. It's wrong to adapt Ukrainian river from russian. YevheniyaL (talk) 09:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined WP:COMMONNAME applies. BTW: "Dnieper" is not Russian, it is English. It is neither spelled nor pronounced like Russian Днепр. This has been discussed almost ad nauseam on article talk, but feel free to start (another) discusssion about it. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, feel free to lecture ME, Ukrainian, on how our river should be called. Even if it's not pronounced like russian Днепр, it's STILL ADAPTED FROM RUSSIAN LANGUAGE which is INAPPROPRIATE. Shame on you. YevheniyaL (talk) 13:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change the name of Dnieper River into Dnipro River because Dnieper is colloquiall and adapted from russian, the official name of the river is DNIPRO. It's disrespectful to call our river Dnieper. YevheniyaL (talk) 13:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined for the same reason as above. Any nationalistic attacks on other editors will not reflect well on you, as you're editing in a contentious topic. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper violating WP:DERRY. Kathleen's bike (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 18:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 11:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello (music) 18:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 68.82.52.152 (talk) 21:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism 68.82.52.152 (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent redirect vandalism. Pretty sure the three accounts who have made a redirect so far are socks of each other. Sideswipe9th (talk) 15:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. for 2 days, will log this at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep linking this film article to List of films considered the best even though this film is not listed at that article. DonIago (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism (and maybe socking). Slatersteven (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:37, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptions back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:GS/RUSUKR. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC) [reply]

By the way, the user only filed for protection so that they can keep a WP:FRINGE source in, since they have no real arguments as to why the source should be kept. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 11:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the IP never bothered to discuss the issue on any talk page that I’m aware of. Reading an article-length version through Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library, I can’t see any particularly serious problems with the work besides his tone.
Boyd-Barrett’s assertions are not quite what IP said they were, and they are exactly the sort of thing that is most vulnerable to getting suppressed by POV editors to a highly inconvenient topic, whether it’s inconvenient to Beijing, Kyiv, Putin, Bush, UK politicians, or even French security bureaucrats.
Also, said IP just violated WP:3RR. Unfortunately, due to excessive multitasking, I didn’t manage to finish drafting my warning on their talk before they did so. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 11:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do arguments somehow magically lose their weight when they are expressed in edit summaries and not on talk pages? By the way, you so far have not provided even a semblance of an argument, nor have you initiated a talk page discussion yourself. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Boyd-Barrett’s assertions are not quite what IP said they were" - please enlighten me, how is the following not denying Syrian responsibility for chemical attacks?

This charge, long before the investigation, let alone proof (coming one year after comparable false confidence alleging Assad’s use of chemical weapons in Syria)...

In the preceding main section of this book, I have discussed the controversial role of the Bellingcat.com investigative journalism site in the coverage of the shooting down of MH17 as well as in contributing evidence during the 2013 saga of the Assad regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons against Syrian rebels – allegations, eventually determined unsound, that almost served as a pretext for direct US and European intervention at that time.

93.72.49.123 (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And then there's also this:

The issues of who was responsible and, if a culpable party could be proven, the appropriate punishment, commanded much political and press attention. While full consensus as to the facts may never be achieved and controversy has persisted,... The MH17 tragedy contributed towards the demonization of Putin and served to distract public attention from issues of the legitimacy of the February 2014 coup, the West’s intervention, and the intensification of hostilities between nuclear powers... Taking their cue from claims of the coup regime in Kiev — hardly an independent source — US politicians and WMM rushed to attribute the downing of MH17 to “pro-Russian” militants, possibly aided and abetted by Russians, who allegedly had used Russian weapons.

But yeah, "Boyd-Barrett’s assertions are not quite what IP said they were". Sure. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to advise both RadioactiveBoulevardier and 93.72.49.123 have this discussion either at Talk:Media portrayal of the Russo-Ukrainian War or at WP:RSN – it's a very valid debate (and important for other articles too) but is wasted here. — Czello (music) 12:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m starting a topic at the TP and then going off the grid for a day or three (lest I be scolded for not treating WP like 24-hour social media the way somebody recently did in this topic area).
In any event, the page should receive protection anyway for the usual reasons. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: consistent edit warring by IP user PhinsUp23 (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: PhinsUp23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours; I have also blocked the IP for three months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Currently TFA; high amount of vandalism from IPs: for example see this, this, and this. Unlimitedlead (talk) 20:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Multiple IP's vandalizing the page recently Cheers! // 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 10:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP or low activity account disruptive editing on a BLP article. Probably only needs to be in place for a short period while this is in the media spotlight. Vladimir.copic (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 116.206.30.55 (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No target specified. Favonian (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism — Hammad (Talk!) 11:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DMacks. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Nearly all IP edits are adding "criminal" or "vandal" or other abuse to the first sentence. Uptick this week as they seem to be in the news in Australia. Belbury (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Stupid sockpuppet vandal, is still attacking. Catfurball (talk) 15:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing to a WP:BLP, appears to be a single user with multiple accounts. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP editors in spite of warning the latest IP on their talk page. Ekdalian (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent removal of content from uncooperative unregistered users, likely a sock puppet who has been warned multiple times, wanting to end an edit war Putitonamap98 (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already have warned them and then reported them on may 24 and they keep jumping to new accounts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:208.119.130.2#January_2021

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism 104.160.96.54 (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Reviewing some of the older edits, I see what you mean. Different IPv6 and IPv4 from Indiana keep removing the same content. Will try a short protection at first. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruptive and unsourced editing on an article about an Indian caste covered under WP:CASTE. Asking for a temp ECP till the disruption subsides and the IPs/new accounts choose to engage in discussion. Gotitbro (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. From the minimal instances of past protection, it doesn't seem like we're in need of ECP yet. I will also log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Raladic (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated WP:BLP violations since the end of April.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page in case this continues afterwards. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 01:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Frequent addition of unsourced 'leader' names. Chumpih t 19:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last such edit was over a week ago. Daniel Case (talk) 01:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users ignoring AfD outcome and recreating page. Raladic (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Supreme Genghis Khan vandalism. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 01:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both socks indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Needs semi-protection due to persistent IP addition of unsourced material that does not adhere to WP:NPOV/WP:TONE. Dl2000 (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C7:E708:7E01:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Isabelle Belato. for 60 hours Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 03:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also explained MOS:DABONE at User talk:108.49.234.81. Johnuniq (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Talk page vandalised again, within hours of the previous protection expiring. MrsSnoozyTurtle 04:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article was already semi-protected for six months. Johnuniq (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent incident, so some wrong informations are being provided repeatedly by random ips. - Iamrajdeepdas (talk) 06:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – Blatant trolling. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 02:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Taking Out The Trash: I might have missed something but I only see one IP and one user post with fairly mild venting. I'll watch it for a while. If I miss something significant, please let me know but people are allowed to be irritated when indeffed. Johnuniq (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article keeps seeing disruptive editing in-regards to different opinions on who is the leader of certain Sikh organizations (especially Budha Dal). There was a schism and split in leadership, so editors keep pushing for their faction's leader to be listed and deleting mention of the other faction and vice-versa. Need page protection and frequent moderating of the page. ThethPunjabi (talk) 02:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @ThethPunjabi: I take your point and agree that an article like that will be a magnet for factional boosterism. However, the last edit was on 25 May 2023 and it has not been challenged. There is nothing on article talk. Before protection occurs, there must be attempts to try to resolve the problem on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism by 2 users and 5 IPs. 2804:F14:80B6:3101:65DC:229F:F083:C30C (talk) 07:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vouching for this one, not sure if it's a sockfarm or some general nonsense. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 07:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There were also 2 additional IPs that tried to vandalize, but were stopped by filters (<1> and <2>).
One of the IPs has been blocked, and all others who's edits got through have been warned, perhaps they will listen. 2804:F14:80B6:3101:65DC:229F:F083:C30C (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is currently being heavily vandalized. I would like to request a protection for this page as we fix it to avoid edit fights. Loibird90 (talk) 08:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs and newly registered users that continued a few days after yet another page protection expired. Turaids (talk) 08:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Might be jumping the gun a bit but trans women lactating has gotten a fair bit of right wing media attention lately due to figures like Matt Walsh and the chances of vandalism are higher now then before. Same with LGBT reproduction and transgender pregnancy. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 07:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Johnuniq (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by three newly registered socks Adakiko (talk) 09:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by administrator 331dot. ~UN6892 tc 17:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's already protected, but it would certainly helpful for admins to keep an eye on this page - looks like WP:LTA/LB2 to me. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 17:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am Kamakshi Bhaskarala Manager. Please can you delete this page or try to edit in English. Dr. Kamakshi Bhaskarla (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Administrators on the English language Wikipedia have no authority on the Telugu Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A bit of primary research (massively fails WP:MEDRS) has gotten picked up in the popular press. Lots of IPs seem eager to add it, nobody is willing to defend it against that on the talkpage. Maybe a week or month of SEMI? DMacks (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive edits by IP’s. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Clear block evasion. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iliochori2 for further context. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IP edits. If approved, this would be the ninth time that the talk page has been protected, with the last time being on January 28th. Since the last protection, 28 edits have been made to the talk page. Of those, 10 of them are edits by IP users that had to be reverted and 8 edits were the reverting edits. I will note that there was one good edit made by an IP user during this time that would have been blocked had protection been in place. I still will request at least a month of temporary protection due to the reoccurring vandalism. Super Goku V (talk) 10:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Temporary semi-protectionWP:DE and possible WP:BLP violations from IP editor. --IJBall (contribstalk) 21:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from multiple sockpuppet accounts of Jeremiah Caquias. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. There has been repeated addition of unsourced content and likely sockpuppetry over spam links. I feel that any further reverts by me would violate 3RR, so I'm letting the most recent unsourced addition stand. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. since those edits were continuing despite the implementation of PCP earlier today. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent introduction of promotional material sourced to institute website. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Seraphimblade. for 2 days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. Constantly changing 'Sexual assault case' to 'controversies' without explaining or justifying the change. Suspected paid activity Sneha996 (talk) 12:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log at CTOPS; it's time to put this one on that radar Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. CastJared (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely.; protection level set to full. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 14:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sudden spate of WP:BLP issues regarding name. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:9409:D210:7DC4:1CB (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Practically a mass edit war. Please temporary-protect as soon as possible. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 17:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Widr. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04 June 2023

Reason: Repeatedly vandalized by IP edits. If approved, this appears to be the first time that this talk page would be protected. Over the course of this year, 83 edits were made that were reverted or were the edits that reverted. With 122 edits so far, 68% of edits to the talk page are vandalism or reverting it. So far as I can tell, only one edit by an IP user was not reverted, though that edit was not helpful to the article. Due to the reoccurring vandalism, I feel that a month of protection might still be needed to hopefully cut down on it. Super Goku V (talk) 10:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from new users and IPs. Bobherry Talk My Edits 15:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection

Since April, several IP users who appear to be the same person have been committing vandalism by changing technical terms to fake coined words and inserting the title of a certain unrelated manga into the text. SLIMHANNYA (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism 173.59.217.7 (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random users keeps adding their "artwork" to the Gallery section without any consensus Trade (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The article hasn't been edited since March 2023. Don't file reports like this. Bbb23 (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very recently unprotected and has much more vandalism. Bobherry Talk My Edits 15:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user(s) continually adding unsourced info.   Aloha27  talk  22:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. If they resume their pattern, report at WP:AIV. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being targeted by none other than WP:LTA/FUERDAI. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 02:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism from WP:LTA/FUERDAI. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 02:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More WP:LTA/FUERDAI vandalism. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 02:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I have been reading this outdated information and slanted take on Morgellons Disease for years. It is damaging to the people who have it. The 2006 study by the CDC was horribly flawed and had a meaningful sample of size of at little as 12 people. The people who wrote this probably never rolled up their sleeves and found out about the people who have this affliction. Have you ever read the many peer reviewed articles which do try to understand this strange dermatological condition? Or the photos of what is found in the skin of these patients? No mention of the Charles Holman Morgellons Foundation. Are all the people and physicians associated with that organization part of a grand delusion? Come on. This one page alone is why I will never make a donation to Wikipedia. I cannot possibly support such a harmful and hurtful page as this one. The sad thing is that I will be written off as a crazy person and one having some kind of grand shared delusion just for writing this. So I don't bother to apply a big effort to change here. I just ask that something be done. I don't have the skills to edit pages and have other interests that are more pressing than Morgellons. Just sad, that's all. Kenna_K (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, protection working as intended. Feel free to open edit requests for specific edits on the talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temp semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk My Edits 15:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 05:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Edit war and many content removal in the last weeks--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by hopping IPs. Jz0610 (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism from multiple accounts and IPs, trying to change the film's budget from what multiple reliable sources list. Grachester (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated link spamming by IP editors 162 etc. (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some new accounts (apparently the same person or coordinating) is adding "Hellenic" to the infobox although no source in the article mentions any "Hellenic" victory. Made a post on the tp with links to WP:RS and WP:OR but the reverting has continued. Some IPs too are apparently making a change to the infobox without consensus. Ktrimi991 (talk) 22:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support semi-protection, the flood of brand new SPAs is continuing no matter how many times they're reverted. lizthegrey (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Template redirect to Template:Sockpuppeteer from a typo. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 02:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 05:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: A mobile editor keeps changing the Joe Biden image, even though different editors have reverted them. Perhaps long term semi-protection is required. GoodDay (talk) 17:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from a Singaporean sockpuppet that also makes similar edits to other Japan-related articles. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost all edits since previous protection expired have been vandalism, BLP violations, or reverts. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism from Singaporean IP user that also makes similar edits to other Japan-related articles. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @CurryTime7-24: The latest revert talks about reverting to a sock and that looks very plausible. There is nothing on article talk. If there is still a problem, please post an explanation on talk and ask again. Johnuniq (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editing war. Sagatorium (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Sagatorium: You are edit warring and there is no discussion on the article talk page. Please stop editing and discuss the issue on article talk, with WP:RS. Edit warring is stopped by rational discussion or blocks. Johnuniq (talk) 05:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. North of the Zambezi 03:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @North of the Zambezi: There are only two recent edits by an IP and and the last was over two hours ago. I take the point that there is no reliable source but the IP's edit looks plausible and under these circumstances I don't think locking them out is the answer. If it starts up again, let me know and I'll have another look. There is some discussion on talk but there needs to be more about why Wikipedia requires RS. The first ref includes "referring to cotton underwear" and perhaps adding that would resolve the issue. Johnuniq (talk) 05:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of Vandalism SlashunkI (talk) 08:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:09, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Article under attack by a WP:SPA. Need the 500 edits level I think. Adoring nanny (talk) 08:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 11:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There has been persistant vandalism by non-users and unregistered users today. Requesting permanent semi-protection to prevent this in the future. -- All The Knowledge in the World (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know you could temporarily protect a page. Good to know. Thank you very much. :) -- All The Knowledge in the World (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor repeatedly making the same changes which have been reverted at least five times so far. Left a warning on their talk page about it as well, though they don't appear to speak English so it's hard to say how effective that will be. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 08:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sensitive topic. Moxy- 12:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. - David Gerard (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism to a WP:BLP, changing translation of name to 'Iraq,' personal attacks [10]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - looks like the previous one day wasn't sufficient David Gerard (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs. Changing club in conflict with source. Adakiko (talk) 09:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be enough for it to settle down, can renew if needed - David Gerard (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – repeated addition of contested unsourced material without discussion. Chaheel Riens (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. In the mean time, I've warned the new editor about edit warring. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Flurry of promotional accounts, we're onto our third account in the past couple of days that was freshly created and is editing no other article than this one. Could we please give it a week or so of semiprotection? David Gerard (talk) 16:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 16:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and what appears to be POV/political whitewashing attempt. - SilentResident (talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 12:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 15:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism 2601:603:1C7F:2530:61BD:B508:7338:7217 (talk) 19:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 11:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like a brief hour of vandalism about 6 hours ago, and the only edits before that were in August. Aoidh (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism started weeks ago (the vandalism was related to my recent revert at the history of the page). ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 13:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. also User(s) blocked. but since the IPs seem to be hopping a bit I don't suspect that alone will solve anything. Aoidh (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism pertaining amount of speakers. TylerBurden (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent LTA/block evasion for many months, and clearly not stopping anytime soon. Magitroopa (talk) 09:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – More BLPVIO (unsourced height and weight changes) after page was unprotected - long, long history of semiprotection in the protection log, better to just indef semi it, IMHO. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 18:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 18:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: There appears to be a content dispute between two IP editors. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 19:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of promotional material for a webcomic. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 17:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing. CLalgo (talk) 17:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption including BLP violations as well as vandalism, chronic issue with the article having been protected on several occasions before. TylerBurden (talk) 21:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Prevent vandalism, frequent misinformation Sartaj267 13:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fuerdai keeps on harassing me. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 00:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This topic was recently in the news, hence its heavily under fire by drive-by accounts and IPs insisting on pushing their unsourced POV (the majority seems to be unsourced POV pushing with a pro-Taliban stance?). I believe page protection for a while will solve the problem. -. LouisAragon (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. With most of the unhelpful editing coming from IPs, ECP isn't necessary. But I will log this as a CTOPS action since it comes under two topic areas Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 00:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A short dustup about six hours ago, yes, but it doesn't seem ongoing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IP's over the last week. Matt Deres (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 08:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Supreme Genghis Khan. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 01:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If our amusing friend is still at it after that, we can reapply it longer - David Gerard (talk) 08:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism over the last couple of days, likely IP hopper.   Aloha27  talk  02:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unconstructive edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 03:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 08:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent/repeated unconstructive IP edits in recent days U-Mos (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I see this one has long-running driveby problems - David Gerard (talk) 08:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An LTA (Roundish t) 14:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected The page Atelier Ayesha is a redirect with no activity, but the article Atelier Ayesha: The Alchemist of Dusk has been semiprotected by User:ScottishFinnishRadish. Aoidh (talk) 16:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, messing with birth date on a WP:BLP. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I want to strengthen my page Alihhassan43 (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 14:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has been 8 years since this article has been protected. I feel 8 years is enough to deter a vandal. Roasted (talk) 02:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have downgraded, and will watch if there is any more disruption; if not, this will just run its course, and be completely unprotected after 3 months. Lectonar (talk) 11:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 20:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question: What is "Low-quality patrolling"? This is what the user got blocked for, and as an admin, I've never heard the term. A search of Wikipedia brings up nothing about that. Please explain. — Maile (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The user's talk page makes it pretty clear - David Gerard (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Lectonar (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Random unsourced changes SurferSquall (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: content removal edit warring Magherbin (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant unsourced and unhelpful changes SurferSquall (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by two feuding users. BattleshipMan (talk) 06:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hello, I was going to make a page for this Indian singer, but found an existing draft for it. The draft wasn't too proper for Wikipedia, It had a lot of unsourced content, Youtube links and also majority of it was a copy of Wikitia page. I do not know who copied who, but I decided to rewrite it to avoid any copyright issues. It took me about 3 hours to work on this, but I am unable to make it live as the page is protected. I realize that it may have had some spam issues in the past for whatever reason, but if you check the current draft that I wrote, you will realize that he is a major Indian singer with many awards and more than enough citations to meet notability. Could you please unprotect this page and move it live? RolandSimon (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The draft hasn't been submitted for review yet; please follow the process laid out at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Lectonar (talk) 09:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 17:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What is "Low-quality patrolling"? This is what the user got blocked for, and as an admin, I've never heard the term. A search of Wikipedia brings up nothing about that. Please explain. — Maile (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Edit warring. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 03:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. One user warring has beeen blocked in the meantime Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits and additions of false information from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 10:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism from a variety of IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 20:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject was recently convicted, and dozens have eagerly added that to the first sentence despite talk page consensus and it already being placed at the end of the first paragraph. Persistent problem. Grorp (talk) 04:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also I added a CTOPS notice to the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP/new users coming in and removing sourced material, claiming it's "hate speech". Paris1127 (talk) 04:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Will also put CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism

This page is about Georgian Prime Minister and is constantly subject to vandalism and has to be locked for several days and weeks, but vandals still return and continue what they do. The most recent instance of vandalism: "ყლე" is an insult word in Georgian meaning "dick". So some vandals decided to edit the name of the person on Wikipedia to make it sound similar to insulting word, so they wrote "ირაყლი" instead of the real name "ირაკლი" (so they replaced some letters to make it more similar to "ყლე").

Just so you know how far all of this goes, even the local media outlet (which is the biggest opposition media) reported this change as a news - "Wikipedia changed the name of Irakli Garibashvili to "ირაყლი") - https://mtavari.tv/news/125426-iraqli-gharibashvils-vikipediashi-sakheli

You can use Google translate.

The page was most likely edited by this media outlet itself. The edit was soon reverted and the user was banned, while page was locked for few days. But vandals still keep returning and appearantly this is not enough and more protection is needed to avoid such vandalism in the future, which is very likely coordinated behaviour. Silveresc (talk) 12:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The page is still protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 21:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What is "Low-quality patrolling"? This is what the user got blocked for, and as an admin, I've never heard the term. A search of Wikipedia brings up nothing about that. Please explain. — Maile (talk) 23:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Blahhh23 (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to review the request. I'm not going to do that because it's different IP addresses. Sometimes it's plain vandalism, and other times it's just poor editing. I do think that implementing a WP:Semi would be a better way to address this issue, but I understand your position. Blahhh23 (talk) 09:44, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I actually made the distinction between vandalism and poor editing (which isn't vandalism). In the last days, the vandalism parts were all done by the same IP, the 2001:xxx. Disruption isn't that high overall. Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I was also mentioning some periods before that. For example, 2 June or 28 May, and other days in previous months. But, it's fine. We can leave it as is. I just wanted to know if it was possible or not. Thank you once again. Blahhh23 (talk) 14:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As soon as it was unprotected, WP:LTA/LB2 came back. Since May 21, it's been nothing but that LTA vandalizing that page. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism, disruptive editing from IPs. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 17:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of poorly or unsourced content. PeachyBum07 (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is continuously vandalized by IP users and is being locked for several days to avoid such incidents, but vandals still return and continue vandalism. High level vandalism by IP users in recent days too. Silveresc (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is factually wrong texts written here pertaining to Nair caste and need to be edited. Mikey.patterson (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the factually incorrect statement about the DIET of Nairs. Remove the incorrect statement " Pork was noted as a favorite food of the Nair, and even high-status Nairs were noted as eating buffalo meat". This is blatantly incorrect and doesn't represent the diet of Nairs. Mikey.patterson (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That content is backed by a reliable source citation. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users repeatedly removing a link. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 20:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: May have given birth today but there do not appear to be reliable sources to confirm this yet. Please semi for 24 hours. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Husband of Princess Eugenie, who may have given birth today; no reliable sources appear to have confirmed this. Please semi for 24 hours. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 14:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unregistered users continuing to ignore the talk page discussion and hidden note about his nationality and force their view on the article. FrB.TG (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. What a mess. Previous was 1 month and the IP just started right up again, so I gave it 3 months this time - David Gerard (talk) 20:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06 June 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent pov pushing and violation of MOS:ETHNICITY by the same person, ongoing since at least October [11]. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – Indef. EdJohnston (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Cosmetic edit sockpuppet persistently targeting the article. TylerBurden (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No protection: MusikBot II added template protection to this page, which prevents AAlertBot from updating this page. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also suggest adding this page to User:MusikBot II/TemplateProtector/config too. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
100K+ transclusions is a lot. Yes, they're only on talk namespaces, but it's still quite a large vector for vandalism. I'm tempted to instead make AAlertBot a template editor. I'll wait for another admin to chime in with their thoughts. If we decide to instead to lower protection, we should probably add all article alert pages to MusikBot II's config. Please ping me if anyone needs help with that. Best, MusikAnimal talk 18:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MusikAnimal I think you’re spot on here. I’m going to give the AA bot template editor rights. Courcelles (talk) 18:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well then, feel free to close this. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 19:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Marking as Not unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Supreme Genghis Khan. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 01:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 01:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, specifically shipping (fandom). Previous page protection for the same issue expired a couple of weeks ago. Problem dynamic IP is at it again. DonQuixote (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 01:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, specifically shipping (fandom). Previous page protection for the same issue expired a couple of weeks ago. Problem dynamic IP is at it again. DonQuixote (talk) 01:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 01:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A redirect from this title to List of unofficial Mario media#Computer games was requested at WP:AFC/R; I see no reason to decline the request. Create protection has been in place for nearly 13 years, and the protecting administrator has since retired, so I'm immediately taking it here. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 00:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Skarmory: Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism and disruption. Novemberjazz 23:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 3 IP addresses have continued to vandalize other's talk page comments. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 02:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent attempts to add unsourced contentious claims (or insults) by 6 different IPs across ~1 hour and a half. Currently ~45 minutes since last attempt.

2804:F14:80B6:3101:94AC:3D6C:795E:EF8A (talk) 04:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing about his retirement. According to his contract with AC Milan, he will retire after his contract runs out. Need protection until 30 June 2023. Sartaj267 07:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, should be temporarily increased to EC permission to counter autoconfirmed editors continuously adding that he is already retired, in violation of WP:BLP. TylerBurden (talk) 19:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's been on autoconfirmed since 2010, evidently with good reason. That'll need to go back after 6 July - David Gerard (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Persistent, aren't they? All three articles are semiprotected - David Gerard (talk) 08:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism and disruptive editing from various IP editors since 5 days ago. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 08:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing disaster. Several competing edits without a reliable source. Tiduszk (talk) 02:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Dam got blown up. There’s gonna be a lot of back and forth “who did it” edits, which have already started Volunteer Marek 03:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Large amounts of IP and new user disruptive editing & vandalism. BappleBusiness[talk] 03:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Borderline but there's not that much vandalism in recent weeks and any protection would have to be lengthy as there is no acute disruption to prevent. Thanks for reporting this, but let's just see how it goes over the next few days. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Botendaddy 03:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: editor editing against consensus that was established to leave out the ethnicity of the subject Magherbin (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism shortly after protection expiry — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 09:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor still adding libelous unsupported claims. Wes sideman (talk) 10:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism is taking place on this page. So please add protection. MRRaja001 (talk) 22:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit more than a month ago. Lectonar (talk) 07:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 09:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Giving it a week for now, though that can be extended as needed - David Gerard (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:GS/RUSUKR related disruption. Mellk (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can be repeated or escalated to ECP as needed of course - David Gerard (talk) 12:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism. Kay girl 97 (talk) 23:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit about 10 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 09:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Various WP:LTA/HOY targets

Temporary semi for all - WP:LTA/HOY spamming, community GBAN evasion. On Talk:Italian Union of Seventh-day Adventist Christian Churches it got unprotected a few days ago but Piermark just came back. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving.... All done, but the bot isn’t going to understand. Courcelles (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: I am requesting to protect this page indefinitely to prevent blanking and vandalism. LDM2003 (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, I think a semi would be better. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 20:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 2 disruptive edits in about 3 months is something we can cope with without resorting to protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page was only created for redirection because some people already want to blank or vandalise the page. In user preferences, I am in a group of Autoconfirmed users. LDM2003 (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also looks like sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 12:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism in the last couple of days. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has a history of edit wars followed by blocking of both participants. Now there are ongoing anonymous edits without discussion on the Talk page MartinPict (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 12:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Gets past Roland Garros. Though we might be right back here if she repeats this performance at Wimbledon. Courcelles (talk) 13:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IPs keep adding uncited or poorly cited information. Protection recently expired. CT55555(talk) 13:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 12:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Costant removal of sourced content by ip users Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 14:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism and addition of unsourced content by IPs. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Hi, there is an edit war on Eleanor of England, Countess of Bar wikipage. Some editors are constantly removing a sentence on a page that is valuable content about the topic. Not sure why there is so much focus on removing this specific sentence : She was the great-grandmother of Elen ferch Tomos, mother of Owain Glyndwr, last native Prince of Wales.

It is valuable information about the links between the Royal families linked to Eleanor of England. As the page doesn't have much content already, it doesn't make any sense removing references and knowledge about this topic. Links between great-grandchildren are often shown on Royal families pages such as the House of Tudor or others. Can you please be of help ? Academia45 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The only disruption is from the single editor above, who is editing as both an IP and as an editor. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've been watching this page for some time, and content that is added by different users are often removed without true justifications. This is not beneficial for Wikipedia as we are here to gather knowledge and help a reader understand a topic. Academia45 (talk) 15:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Conflitcts were with me and Kansas Bear and Celia Homeford basically. Academia45 (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please use the article's talk page to come to a consensus. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Please move back to original article title Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam and the lock moves for 1-2 weeks. lots of back and forth moving with less to no discussion. Denniss (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done by me and User:AncientWalrus. Hut 8.5 16:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting move protection. Reason: Three different users have moved this page away from Destruction of the Kakhovka Dam without discussion, despite there being a discussion on the talk page which asks for consensus prior to moves (for the last two moves). This page is under WP:GS/RUSUKR and also contentious per Eastern Europe. The moves seem to keep happening, no reason that they will suddenly stop unless the page is move protected AncientWalrus (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See move log and talk page discussion AncientWalrus (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 16:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism of this BLP, WP:NPOV issues. CT55555(talk) 01:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP isn't necessary because the disruption is coming from IPs. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: temporary semi protection because it is the featured article and thus a victim for vandalism Stenkos (talk) 11:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. until it's off the Main Page. Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Every week, several edits are made (and subsequently reverted) adding a fictional flag to this historical country's infobox. This issue has been discussed at length and resolved by consensus. The infobox contains a warning not to fill the 'flag image' field, yet editors have added the fictional flag multiple times a week for several months. I am requesting low-level page protection to resolve this edit-war. EtheyB (talk) 15:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Commons has two images related to the dispute: File:Flag_of_the_Confederation_of_the_Rhine.png, used in three articles, and File:Alleged_flag_of_the_Rhine_Confederation_1806-13.svg used more widely. Aside from what is done with protection, perhaps those images should be purged. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Requesting protection again since the chronic issue continues with more vandalism since the WP:BLP vios, vandalism etc. TylerBurden (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Portwoman (talk) 10:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page Vandalism continued 1 Day after protection expired. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 14:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2A00:23A8:D46:8601:ACC9:1D6:F85A:256C (talk) 15:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent genre warring – Resumption of edits by IP socks of MariaJaydHicky. Blueberry72 (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 18:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – IP editors - possibly the subject herself, family members or friends - have tried to write promotional content into the article for years. See also the talk page.

Although a talented multilingual journalist, the article subject seems to aspire to wider popular fame, as seen through book-selling, podcasting and speaking promotion on the website, https://www.golikemariana.com/ - the recent edits to the article appear to be a self-promotion effort. Zefr (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 disruptive edit today, and only 5 total edits since February 2022, it appears you have it under control... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Robert Hinkle has recently issued an injunction in a case concerning gender-affirming care that has made his page a target for vandalism by those opposed to the injunction, with one attempting to vandalize the page by calling him a "vile human being" in his bio. Recommending we put pending changes protection on the page for the next few days while the news cycle plays out. The full injunction in question: https://www.glad.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/doe-v-ladapo-order-granting-pi.pdf 159.153.149.4 (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. First edit today in over a month, no signs of disruptive editing in the last several years. We do not pre-emptively protect pages. - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

07 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Throughout May, IP users adding affiliate links with deceptive edit summaries of "CSS correction" or "fixed type." IPs were blocked but continue to do so, most recently on May 31 (3 times), June 5, and now on June 6th. CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2601:192:8503:f770::/64 (talk · contribs). – this time for a month. Favonian (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the table that is on the very beginning of the page, in the section of "Instrument(s)", as a suggestion, as a personal opinion, I think the instruments piano and guitar should be added. In the same article it is mentioned he plays piano on the sub-topic "Artistry", and it is also mentioned that he has a song about his piano. As for the guitar, now that he is currently on his world tour D-Day he has some acoustic song that he plays on his guitar. Minyunki04 (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

add a citation to Cuban Missile Crisis and Khrushchev's ousting HypeEditor (talk) 05:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What citation should be added, for what statements? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include reliable sources supporting your claim. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent disruption by IP editor not engaged on the talk page; article and talk page history indicates WP:CON on existing version. Zefr (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Possibility of disruptive editing Ibshan (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent addition of unsourced BLP "information" by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant edit warring by different anons and they continue adding subjective words like large which are as mentioned WP: Subjective and they are also engaging in WP: Editwarring despite me telling them to take it to the talkpage. It might need a page protection for now. DragonofBatley (talk) 00:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: vandalism Ucbassetmanagement (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined the "vandalism" appears to be just people not letting you remove negative stuff you don't like. Hut 8.5 11:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Potential risk of vandalism, requesting protection until 30 June 2023 Sartaj267 14:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP user Silveresc (talk) 14:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism by registered user Silveresc (talk) 14:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A flare-up in LTA activity from Projects/GRP. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP-hopping vandalism by socks of Bigshowandkane64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent instance of vandalism on the page by registered user. Might be related to overall increase of vandalism on Georgian political pages. Silveresc (talk) 14:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Single user, single edit, we do not protect pre-emptively. - Adolphus79 (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts, requesting temporary semi protection. WikiVirusC(talk) 17:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: recent sock puppetry and content removal Magherbin (talk) 02:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 17:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 03:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long list of vandalism after the recent protection had expired. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 08:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: IP has been at it with multiple users by adding genres that aren't needed in the lead. Edwordo13 (talk) 11:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 11:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from block-evading IP editor based in Singapore. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in recent weeks Silveresc (talk) 13:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing sock activity -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 14:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated IP editing by blocked User:Akaora, with blatant copyvios. No other IP or new editor edits this year. NebY (talk) 15:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs are tag-teaming this one article today for puerile vandalism. One's been blocked, another has been reported, but new ones keep emerging. Please semi for three days to give them time to move on to a new fixation. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Copyvios additions resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs speculatively editing based on information that isn't anywhere near confirmed yet. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joseph2302, speculation ≠ vandalism (please see WP:NOTVANDALISM) Which is to say, vandalism is a narrow subset of disruptive editing, so best to be precise. El_C 19:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IPs keep changing ending date even though the show is still ongoing, also high level of vandalism. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, ex partner continually adding untrue legal and personal information, defamation of person, very serious false information being added in edits. 2403:4800:245F:F356:F9A1:3D63:F238:ADD8 (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism due to transfer, need protection until 30 June 2023 Sartaj267 19:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent changing of the club he plays for despite the fact that his Real Madrid contract does not run out until July 1st. Accounts that are autoconfirmed/confirmed are disruptively editing the page and forcing experienced editors to revert everytime. There is vandalism going on too. Please protect until July 1st so the disruptive editing stops. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request semi-protection for this article, which has been the subject of block evasion by CanadianHistorian(MMA & History). For the gruesome details, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CanadianHistorian(MMA & History). This has been an on-going problem ever since April of last year, and this article has been protected twice because of this issue. This guy does not learn. As soon the block expires, he starts editing the article again. For this reason, I would like this article to be protected for a substantial period of time, say for a year or so. This guy edits a number of articles as an IP, so please forgive me for the volume of requests I will be placing here. Thank you for your time and help. A.S. Brown (talk) 04:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now, A.S. Brown, you need to report disruption as it happens. That usually means within days, otherwise it starts becoming Stale. I note that last protection was for 2 weeks on Sept 2022. El_C 17:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Same anon as before, pushing the same poorly sourced text. FyzixFighter (talk) 04:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 17:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from various IP addresses. Tollens (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Tony Moore as a creator of the comic book series The Walking Dead. Hanza122 (talk) 17:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Superseded by this correctly placed request. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Again, another article that has been the subject of block evasion by the blocked editor CanadianHistorian(MMA & History). Again, please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CanadianHistorian(MMA & History). Given that this has been a chronic, on-going problem ever since April 2022, would it be possible to have this article semi-protected for about a year or so? Protecting an article for a month or two does not work with CanadianHistorian-he starts editing again as an IP the moment the block expires. Thank you for your help. A.S. Brown (talk) 05:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:58, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Again, I'm sorry for submitting so many requests here. It is just that the blocked editor CanadianHistorian likes to engage in block evasion with a number of articles. This article has been heavily edited by this blocked editor recently, and requires semi-protection. Thank you for your time. A.S. Brown (talk) 05:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 17:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is one of the favorite articles to edit by the blocked editor CanadianHistorian who seems to be some sort of on-line propagandist for the Rock Machine. Please refer to the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CanadianHistorian(MMA & History). This has been an on-going problem since April of last year, so would it be possible to have this article semi-protected for about a year or so? Thank you for your time. A.S. Brown (talk) 05:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. A.S. Brown, anyway, so I range blocked that IP for 3 months. If there are still problems, feel free to relist. Cheers! El_C 18:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IPv6 editor has been trying more than once in the past week to change the end of the TV series' year run from "2023" to "present", despite all indications from reliable sources in its article that the show has ended. –WPA (talk) 12:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. IP blocked since they're doing the same thing in other pages, but otherwise, this is not a protection matter atm. El_C 18:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – User is blocked, having only come here to promote themselves - and having vandalised a few pages in doing so. Now that they can only edit their talk page they are just continuing there - most recently like this - and they don't seem bothered to use the talk page to request they be unblocked. Is it time to either protect the page, or remove their rights to edit it? Or is it harmless to just leave them to it?. Dorsetonian (talk) 12:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done but TPA revoked. El_C 18:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated pointless IP editing. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 18:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in recent weeks. Silveresc (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 18:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08 June 2023

Reason: Some Users are adding mal information on this page U.embalo (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 20:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can we have a month protection please, too much back and forth going on due to current events. His contract to Tottenham starts the beginning next month, so this could have a whole month of disruption without it. Govvy (talk) 20:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Isabelle Belato: Be the same about after two weeks, four weeks is requested. Regards. Govvy (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Govvy: Assuming this is related to the date the subject is to join the new team, I've extended the protection to 1 month. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LuGusDeclanBibaElodieBarnaby 23:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs removing well-sourced content claiming the sources are "outdated.". — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There's little engagement beyond calling the IP editor a "vandal," them responding with "cringe individual," and so on — no one comes out looking good in that exchange. Please take it to the talk page. El_C 20:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@El C: How do you suggest editors wp:talk with someone / something hopping IPs?
Also, the reverts are persistent on content that's well sourced. Murtaza.aliakbar (talk) 22:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Intense transfer rumours linking Bellingham to Real Madrid. Autoconfirmed/confirmed users are persistently changing his club when nothing is actually official, and the transfer window has not opened yet. Please protect for a period of at least one week until things cool down, so that experienced editors do not have to keep consistently reverting. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: per WP:GS/RUSUKR: This page is related to Russo-Ukrainian War. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am going to make a pitch for indefinite protection here. It is not just that this page is a repeat target for sock puppets of Belteshazzar (see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Belteshazzar), although that is the main reason that I am rasing this right now, it is more that I think that important guide documents like this one require greater protection than articles. It must be very rare for anybody who has the experience required to edit such a document constructively not to have a registered account. The few exceptions can be handled by letting anonymous users make edit requests on the Talk page and actioning them only if the suggestion is helpful. DanielRigal (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. I agree that indefinite semi-protection is called for. The bot is very hair-trigger tonight. MelanieN (talk) 02:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Protection is evidently no longer needed. as there hasn't been any edit warring in months, and the IP address that claimed to return has gone dark. I don't see any evidence that the IP address in question is planning on returning. I also see the page is barely even being edited, so I think it should be re opened to the public, so anybody can edit it. Thank you for your consideration. 50.206.232.94 (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin, but just wanted to add a comment. Wouldn't an IP not be able to make edits when the page is protected? so how do you know the IP did not try and found it to be protected? RolandSimon (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't saying as far as the particular page, I meant on Wikipedia as a whole. I haven't seen them making any edits on Wikipedia in general. 24.126.8.228 (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cullen328: last protecting admin: any thoughts on that?. My 2c: I would leave the page protected, at most pending-changes protection might be considered. Lectonar (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's been nearly three days since the ping, and Cullen has been editing. As a compromise – the reason for its protection no longer applies, a reasonable period has elapsed, and there is no consensus that continued protection is necessary – I would've preferred to simply unprotect the page, but pending-changes will ensure that IP edits will be reviewed. Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former admin, not recent

Former admin, 6+ months

Reason: I'd like access to these 13 pages to address the Tidy Font bug errors and other WP:LINT found within, as I have with similar past requests in April (1, 2, and others). Each of these pages was selfprotected by the former admin, so asking the protecting admin prior to this request is not needed. I have Extended Confirmed access, so that or lower is fine, whatever is appropriate for each.

If I have overlooked anything that would be an issue, or you feel that any page needs to be temporary Extended Confirmed and returned to Full after I've addressed all Lint issues, that is fine (temporaries would be addressed first, and I'd let you know when finished if any). Happy to discuss anything if you have further questions. Thank you.

Zinnober9 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected everything. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – On-going disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – per WP:GS/RUSUKR: related to Russo-Ukrainian War. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 03:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits and possible vandalism from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 03:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement (Russian invasion of Ukraine). Aydenholtonvlogs (talk) 02:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 04:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement (related to the RIOU). Aydenholtonvlogs (talk) 02:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 04:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement (Russian invasion of Ukraine). Aydenholtonvlogs (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 04:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbitration enforcement (Russian invasion). Aydenholtonvlogs (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 04:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lame owner vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kinu t/c 04:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of dubious content by IPs. Steelkamp (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 05:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced content repeatedly being restored by IP. Dorsetonian (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade to extended-confirmed protection Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by autoconfirmed users. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 10:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant addition of false information ArojamDharkon (talk) 05:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPv6s adding/changing claims without citing published reliable sources and, instead, relying on WP:OR.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 07:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Per previous 1-week protection: a YouTuber made a video where they typed a sentence into the lead of article as a joke, so IPs who've just watched it are coming to Wikipedia and typing that sentence into the lead of this article as a joke. Belbury (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of new/Ip editors adding spam links. This will be related to the ongoing 2023 ICC World Test Championship final, which is increasing viewers on this article, so a few days of semi-protection should suffice. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rastinition (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently officially renamed. High level of IP vandalism and edit warring. Park3r (talk) 06:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism (both IPv4 and IPv6). [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] Chaipau (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chaipau, please review WP:NOTVANDALISM. The IP claims that the passage in question is WP:UNDUE,[17], so I suggest you discuss it on the article talk page (Talk:People of Assam). El_C 11:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Users connected to the bank and at least one user who is an employee of the bank removing well-sourced content and replacing it with promotional content. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 13:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP users spreading nonsense and misinfo, such as how Kikli is voiced by Samir Fothergill (who doesn't even exist). DoggyDonPKDPKD (talk) 05:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP editor revert warring, removing sources and adding unreliable links. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Per WP:GSRUSUKR. – MaterialWorks 10:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 10:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Flare-up in disruptive IP activity. Some is from Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Projects and some is from User:Beyond My Ken/Bad copyediting IP. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Receiving vandalism. Deserves protection. MaskedSinger (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you sir. MaskedSinger (talk) 13:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Socks have returned here as well.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 15:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was about to make the same request. This stub has a history of nothing but unconstructive edits by IPs, including a recent spate of vandalism. Strongly recommend the protection be indefinite Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 15:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing has been ongoing due to Martin's ongoing speculation regarding a potential move to Southampton. In addition to this, additions of unsourced content have also been an issue. Fats40boy11 (talk) 15:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Longer semi - as soon as it was unprotected, WP:LTA/HOY came back. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing event, which is why it's getting petty IP vandalism. 3-4 days semi-protection should be okay (other related articles have been similarly protected). Joseph2302 (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – a target for sock puppetry. Tommi1986 let's talk! 17:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism of his name. > Asheiou (they/them • talk) 12:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs, proxies, webhosts. Blocked as Special:Contributions/51.15.0.0/16, previously blocked as Special:Contributions/2603:C021:8007:83EE:0:0:0:0/64 . Binksternet (talk) 14:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The poor performance of the game has created drama and result has generated a lot of continuous vandalism ArMor (talk) 15:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent spate of vandalism. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 15:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Various editors continually insist that Ince & Co has nothing to do with the Ince Group nor Ince Gordon Dodds even though news reports indicate otherwise. One of those editors even added a proposed deletion tag today.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, IP(s) keeps coming back and vandalizing the page, would recommend temporary page protection. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Please limit to extended-confirmed per WP:GS/RUSUKR AncientWalrus (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged at WP:GS/RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attacked by sockpuppt vandal. Catfurball (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of inaccurate fatality and damage tolls after previous semi-protection (duration of a month) was dropped. Even when a note was added to stop it, the inaccuracies continued. It's all being conducted by multiple IP's with no previous edit history. There has been three semi-protections before and each time they were lifted, the same thing happened. RandomInfinity17 (talk - contributions) 21:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:16, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing/fringe POV pushing by IP user on proxies. BilCat (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism and live score updates (which aren't permitted). Same pointless editing as 2023 ICC World Test Championship final (current event) and ICC World Test Championship, which has been semi-protected too. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – He has confirmed his departure from PSG, causing a lot of disruptive editing in recent days, with a bit of vandalism too. Please semi-protect until he leaves the club on July 1st, 2023. Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attacked by sockpuppet vandal. Catfurball (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attacked by sockpuppet vandal. Catfurball (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Attacked by sockpuppet vandal. Catfurball (talk) 17:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism - page gets constantly vandalized by users adding unsourced or fictional information coming from a alt-his game mod which utilized the concept Lamounier2332 (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor(s) continue to remove well-sourced information solely because the source is more than two years old. Each edit comes from a different IP address making talk page notifications nigh useless. This is more than just a content dispute, this is pushing a particular POV. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Possibly, this is more than just a content dispute, but following my decline from yesterday, at least an attempt to engage the dispute on the talk page is expected, which as far as I'm able to tell has yet to happen. El_C 22:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It's a current event and those tend to have a lot of vandalism. Also I know this is anecdotal but I'm already hearing conspiracy theories that all of this is a hoax or whatever and I'm a bit worried that is going to leak onto wikipedia. JBrahms (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page has already had one recent case of vandalism, if that changes anything ForsythiaJo (talk) 21:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For such an actively-edited article, if it's just one or two instances, probably not. El_C 22:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: User request within own user space. 📖 (💬/📜) 22:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 01:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Genghis Khan targets

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Supreme Genghis Khan. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 01:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The guy's long-running, so I gave them a month each - David Gerard (talk) 09:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP disruption resumed shortly after the previous protection expired. gnu57 02:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the specific nature of the disruption occurring, a longer period of protection may be necessary if this one doesn't mitigate the issue sufficiently. Chetsford (talk) 06:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 03:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Chetsford (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism: [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31] Yours6700 (talk) 05:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were three instances of IP vandalism in the last two months, all of which were reverted. Chetsford (talk) 06:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Considerable edit-warring, particularly from drive-by IPs. This is a BLP about a controversial person. Could we start at 1 week of autoconfirmed? - David Gerard (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the (rather extensive) protection log...1 week would be an unwarranted kindness to the vandalisers, tbh. Lectonar (talk) 09:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I wish to unprotect my CSS Commons page completely. I have my reasons for this, but I would like a courtesy unprotection of this subpage of mine. CheezDeez (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – as far as I know, this is not technically possible. (It would also be a very poor idea: "The ability to edit JS/CSS that is executed in other users' browsers is very powerful, and extremely dangerous in the hands of a malicious user".) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors are persistently trying to add sensationalism from recent media, as reported from in vitro lab research (far from WP:MEDRS sourcing). PP until the issue settles down. Zefr (talk) 05:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit about 3 days ago. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism count by IP addresses has been increasing since the end of May. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 06:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Restoring the same edits. LDM2003 (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's adding unsourced stuff about movie reviews by critics. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 04:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. This page is getting lots of vandalism, persisten and ongoing, perhaps having at least pending changes protection for rest of the month when it is a more "hot topic". Lakwat (talk) 10:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Good call - David Gerard (talk) 11:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent sockpuppetrty/block evasion. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism due to recent transfer. Need protection until 30 June 2023 Sartaj267 11:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's keep making unnecessary edits to the category order which is not policy, nor necessary, and or helpful with the persistent back and forth that is becoming disruptive. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I'm not seeing any edits that actually added or removed categories - so the effect on page content or categorisation is zero? If vandals were removing cats that'd be completely different of course, but it seems they just like alpha order and you don't? If there's a more substantive issue please be clear what it is - David Gerard (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Smagzine socks spamming. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 04:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Still subject to disruptive editing. It has been going on for a while, especially over the infobox result. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:BALKANS with a mix of WP:ARBINFOBOX2. El_C 12:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps adding things, initially without a source but now using an existing source to re add additional content while removing the original content. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 12:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeatedly reverted by IP address hopper Vidpro23 (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: I can't tell what's happening. Vidpro23, why do you use edit summaries so seldom? El_C 12:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to constructively edit this page, and this hopper keeps undoing my progress. It's as simple as that. Vidpro23 (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay...? El_C 12:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Vidpro23, as we speak, you reverted without an edit summary! El_C 12:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I see Special:Contributions/85.255.236.206 and it's coming together. But Vidpro23, you really do need to start using edit summaries. El_C 12:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: A couple of IPs are vandalizing the page with all forms of nonsense, with one IP adding disgusting material, as seen here: [32]]Edwordo13 (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP hopper keeps reverting constructive editing Vidpro23 (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: so how many of these pages are there, and again, what and why? El_C 12:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 12:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Nevesnotrab (talk) 12:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 13:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 13:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SFR, do you mind if I WP:GENSEX it up? El_C 13:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
El_C, by all means, go for it. Feeling like it's going to end up needing longer, too. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 14:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was written by some racism people, They have some indent to create a fake history against the particular community people also provide the fully fake information. So kindly request you to delete the page or given the edit access. RahulKrishna1986 (talk) 09:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Feel free to use an edit request on article talk, which is not protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP accounts, mainly originating from Bulgaria. Relates to footballer match statistics which continue to get vandalized. Page has been protected a few times already, see RfPP request dating from September 2018. After unprotect vandalism continues. Pelotastalk|contribs 13:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 13:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet editor including on talk page. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 13:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Allen. Not sure protection is needed for this specific page, though. El_C 13:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations based on primary and unreliable sources. Woodroar (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Today's TFA. High level of vandalism due to exposure. GuardianH (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The remainder of its time on the Main Page. While the editor responsible for the worst vandalism has been globally locked, there is the possibility they could find a sock. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All edits this month reverted. Nswix (talk) 16:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A person using multiple IPs keeps reverting to an older logo in spite of warnings on multiple of the IPs!. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 17:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Autoconfirmed socks getting through. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 18:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Restoration of the same edits by a sockmaster (User:DiscoveryTeenHD). This has been going for a month now since 8 May (diff). He has restored the same edit again from now (diff2). See the edit history for research. LDM2003 (talk) 15:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it. Thank you! LDM2003 (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Wikipedialuva (talk) 20:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This was salted some eleven years ago, primarily because dudes from /b/ kept creating the page with the text "longcat is looooooo[...]ooong". Since then, a large number of reliable sources have covered the subject, leading to User:JPxG/Draft27. I left a message for the protecting admin about a month ago but have not received any response. Anyway, I cannot move my draft into mainspace until this is addressed. Thanks for your time! jp×g 20:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected – Muboshgu (talk) 20:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: Thank you very much! Do you think you could do the talk page too (apparently they were salted separately from one another)? jp×g 20:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I thought it would've been unprotected with the page, but it's done now. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10 June 2023

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and frequent re-addition of unsourced, unqualified and bad faith edits lacking in any evidence or qualitative basis. Cucas1234 (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – SPAs still making repeated POV requests to change well-established material. Dronebogus (talk) 23:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It was a week last time and we have to escalate slowly. The aim is to break the habit of whatever group is pushing the nonsense but it would be a big deal to protect a talk page for an extended period. Johnuniq (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Numerous BLP violations. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Amigao (talk) 22:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 00:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 01:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Page-move vandalism – Someone (including a extended confirmed user ChaitanyaJo) keep using the same deleted content to both hijack existing articles by disruptive moves and create new pages about a thoroughly non-notable person for a long term. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Annamalai (I.P.S) and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Annamalai Kuppusamy. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tone deaf CEO of Reddit has an AMA on Reddit, people are understandably pissed. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 03:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Abecedare (talk) 04:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism is also being missed. (Roundish t) 00:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. @Roundish: can you please check whether the current protected version is free of BLP vios. For example, I believe these recent additions to the infobox may be insults but am not sure. Abecedare (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Obviously a magnet for vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Surprisingly little disruptive activity/vandilism by IPs and uncomfirmed accounts over the last few hundred edits I checked. Feel free to re-ask if this changes. Abecedare (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has been the target of ethno-nationalistic disruption for countless years, and it's still going strong. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Continuous addition of unsourced death information. -- Pokelova (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: This has been protected since 2009, and should reasonably be given a chance at unprotection again in accordance with WP:PREEMPTIVE, "The duration of the protection should be set as short as possible". No contact issued to protecting admin, as they have since retired from Wikipedia and are no longer a sysop. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – There is ample evidence of the attraction this topic exerts on vandals and no reason to believe that it has changed since the article was protected. Favonian (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism due to recent transfer. Sartaj267 13:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Sartaj267, has it not been officially confirmed? El_C 13:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Officially confirmed, however Bundesliga summer transfer window commences from 1 July. Sartaj267 05:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism due to recent transfer Sartaj267 05:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 11:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Spanish elections are coming up and as is usual there's lots of "dodgy" edits that include adding info with no sources and lots of section blanking. There has been a few interventions and reverts in the last days and things don't seem to be getting better, pending protection until the end of july when the elctions end seems adequate. Lakwat (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looking at the history, it includes unexplained section blanking by editors who've been here long enough to edit through autoconfirmed, PC or ECP anyway. So I've locked it for a week (probably on the wrong version, sorry) so that hopefully the editors who should know better can hash it out on the talk page before anyone has to take it to WP:ANI. No doubt in a week it'll need more attention in the time up to the election - David Gerard (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 07:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Perennial vandal too. Hopefully they'll get bored - David Gerard (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 08:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - David Gerard (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial topic. IP editors and a few new accounts have been vandalizing this article, including on: April 1, 4, 9, 20, 28 & 29, May 26, June 9 & 10. Grorp (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 95.57.53.138 (talk · contribs) blocked by Doug Weller. Favonian (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sure, there's some vandalism but at a manageable level. Favonian (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Because the article about Wikipedia is a high visible page, I'm requesting to enable full protection for the article (Edit — allow only administrators). 178.95.99.242 (talk) 08:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a good reason to protect the article. Nythar (💬-🍀) 08:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Favonian (talk) 10:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. DavidWalker01 (talk) 10:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No IPs have edited this page – ever. Favonian (talk) 10:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP, insists that Charles III, is the first Greek monarch of Australia. The king isn't considered Greek. GoodDay (talk) 04:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Looks like one silly IP, they've been cautioned, if they persist then a short block is probably appropriate - David Gerard (talk) 11:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being edited by connected contributors, removing sourced contents. AlbeitPK (talk) 11:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The contested removal happened back in February. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits from an anonymous users despite multiple warnings. The anonymous user keeps changing IPs so blocking them isn't going to do anything. Bowling is life (talk) 14:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 14:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some Peoples are editing with wrong informations . Dhananjaydhanu246 (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – There are some levels of vandalism and as this article is the subject of a current event, there are some vandalism and BLP violations by new users. DDMS123 (talk) 22:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DDMS123: Of course it's turmoil there but checking a couple of edits I couldn't see any particular vandalism. Please give a couple of diffs or at least the dates/times of edits and briefly explain why it is WP:VAND. Johnuniq (talk) 00:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unsourced release date changes. This has happened in the past too and it's happening again. Bowling is life (talk) 13:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. it looks like about 3-4 IP edits a month for the past few months. Aoidh (talk) 14:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopping editors are hell-bent on changing the description. Is he a rapper and singer or a singer and rapper? Definitely worth edit warring over. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by edit-warring set of IPs. Jingiby (talk) 13:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: persistent SPA and IP vandalism 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:58F8:CFF:FE3A:2E35 (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead, change from "a right-wing backlash" to "an extremist right-wing backlash" because no normal right wing person would do such things. "Extremist" should not be confused with far-right. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 18:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: And right-wing is not the same as far-right either. The article Far-right politics literally calls it extremism. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 15:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11 June 2023

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry - MehmoodS/HaughtonBrit and Lithuaniaball2. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 16:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of talk page disruption, and it's constant. We need long-term semi-protection. We can't get much done. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if the disruptive editing by IPs persist after protection is done and we may try a longer period. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent spamming. [33] [34] [35] Merko (talk) 21:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP vandalism, IPs are treating Wikipedia as fandom site. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 08:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Aoidh (talk) 14:16, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You think they are not enough ? Ajeeb Prani (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
4 edits a week apart isn't really a lot... especially since talk pages should remain unprotected. (Roundish t) 22:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Colorado IP range Special:Contributions/2601:282:700:ED50:0:0:0:0/64 has been promoting the non-notable band Durango Dank. Binksternet (talk) 17:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another possible solution is to place a partial block on the IP range. Binksternet (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Appears to be a single user. As Binksternet mentioned, a range block would solve the issue... - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent BLP vandalism by IP-hopping user on different ranges since mid-May. BilCat (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Slow but consistent IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Moxy- 23:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – There have been two reverted moves of this article; no further moves should be attempted until the pending RM request is closed (the early consensus does favor an eventual move, but there is still no reason to preempt the RM process),. WCQuidditch 02:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism due to recent transfer. Need protection until 30 June 2023. Sartaj267 12:36, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced information, due to rumors and speculation of the player's transfer status Bnwkr (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: user including statements not in the source Magherbin (talk) 18:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. and logged under CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs blanking a current event page. Viriditas (talk) 19:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also put a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. l ke (talkcontribs) 21:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Rastinition (talk) 23:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The two IPs have been range blocked, and there's just two vandalism edits. It's not worth it to protect. If vandalism consistently continues, re-report. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This redirect has been fully protected since 2010 as the result of an AfD. I highly doubt the protection is still needed after 13 years. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotected Did it myself since the protecting admin lost the tools for nonuse seven years ago and hasn't edited in almost five. Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptively requesting semi-protection due to contentious subject to prevent IP vandalism, in line with existing semi-protection of the New York prosecution case against Trump. Ppt91talk 20:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Adolphus79 In your rush to decline, I don't believe you actually looked closely at this request. I am aware articles are not protected pre-emptively, but that applies to regular articles not articles under arbitration enforcement. Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York which falls under "Protected "Indictment of Donald Trump": Arbitration enforcement: WP:AP2" The same arbitration enforcement should apply here. Ppt91talk 00:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find anything at WP:ARBAP2 regarding preemptive protection, could you please provide a link? - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Adolphus79 & @Ppt91: Adolphus79 is not an administrator and cannot protect or decline to protect articles. Wait for an administrator to protect/decline to protect. Nythar (💬-🍀) 01:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, nothing I do here matters, and we all know that no one wants me to be an admin, but I still can't find any preemptive protection discussion at ARBAP2, nor any such actions in the logs for Prosecution of Donald Trump in New York... I was only asking for links to the discussions about preemptively protecting these pages. - Adolphus79 (talk) 01:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page hasn't been heavily vandalized, so I don't believe it needs protection either, but I guess we'll wait and see. Nythar (💬-🍀) 01:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was my opinion also, after looking at everything in my rush to decline... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. While it's likely this article will need protection in the future, it's not needed right now. @Adolphus79: I always welcome input from other editors when deciding if protection is needed or not, but avoid "officially" declining requests in the future. Thanks. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for the inconvenience, I will shut up and go back to my corner now... - Adolphus79 (talk) 02:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Donnowin1 (talk) 02:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 02:53, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Plenty of IP-disruption, controversial politician, semi-protection would be good. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Persistent disruption from IPs edit-warring DeCausa (talk) 09:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 11:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated erroneous and unsourced changing of content by unregistered user Griffindaly (talk) 04:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism H Hangshing (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – A sockpuppet is disputing the Italian origin of this dish, again. Belbury (talk) 17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also blocked the sock--Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism in the last two days. This is a stub page but of a high ranking member of the Tanzanian Government. Unsourced content keeps getting added. Sputink (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:58F8:CFF:FE3A:2E35 (talk) 04:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Plus I added a CTOPS notice to the talk page for IPA (since the claimed land includes parts of present-day India, IMO it comes under "broadly construed"), although I am not logging anything yet. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent IP and new SPA vandalism 2A00:23EE:2678:4134:58F8:CFF:FE3A:2E35 (talk) 04:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also blocked all the vandalizing accounts indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Majority (if not all) of the edits done by IPs since June 2022 (when the previous protection expired) has been vandalism. And given that the editing traffic from editors with autoconfirmed rights isn't high or frequent, hence would like to request for indef protection. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And will log under CTOPS since this has been ongoing Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent IP editor keeps restauring approximations sourced to the predatory doi:10.31618/ESSA.2782-1994.2021.1.70.68. Likely self promotion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be the work of one individual, warn them appropriately and report to WP:AIV for a range block if necessary... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Blua lago (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today's single disruptive edit was reverted and the user blocked, last disruptive edits were over a month ago (and then 2 months prior to that), not enough recent activity to justify protection... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Ongoing vandalism across all my Edits across multiple Pages by user: Thoma FM.Heyden (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 21:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bot is correct, already protected by Mattythewhite - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving.... Yep. This will make the bot take this away. Courcelles (talk) 22:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by anonymous users since the article was started.  samee  converse  17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As the WP:JOURNALIST, the person mentioned in the article has no any notability. Salazarov 17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC). Salazarov 17:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any obvious vandalism anywhere in the history of this page, are you sure this is the article for which you intended to request protection? (Also, you just tagged the article for CSD, what is the point of the protection request?) - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Multiple IP accounts vandalizing the article (check history). 📖 (💬/📜) 21:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12 June 2023

Reason: Consistent deletion of verified information by likely sockpuppet accounts resulting in an edit war despite attempts to find a resolution via discussion on both the article and the users talk pages. 121.200.6.242 (talk) 07:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 121.200.6.242 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. per WP:3RR and WP:BOOMERANG. Advice to future reporters: report here before you violate 3RR (and no, the fact that you were restoring sourced content isn't an exception). Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 22:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Courcelles (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former admin, not recent

Former admin, 5+ months ago

Reason: I'd like access to these 12 pages to address the Tidy Font bug errors and other WP:LINT found within, as I have with similar past requests (most recently last week's). Each of these pages was selfprotected by the former admin, so asking the protecting admin prior to this request is not needed. I have Extended Confirmed access, so that or lower is fine, whatever is appropriate for each.

If I have overlooked anything that would be an issue, or you feel that any page needs to be temporarily lowered to Extended Confirmed and returned to Full after I've addressed all Lint issues, that is fine (temporaries would be addressed first, and I'd let you know when finished if any). Happy to discuss anything if you have further questions. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk)

Hi. Several of these editors are presently active. Apologies if I missed it, but have you asked them if they'd be happy for these usertalk archives to be unprotected? If not that seems a straightforward way to resolve this request. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have absolutely no objections to my archives being unprotected for the purpose of maintenance. If I did, I would have raised it at the last bulk-archive request last week. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 05:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Jéské Couriano. This one  Done. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... for the bot. Favonian (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several editors have for these last two days, been requesting an update. Johnston has resigned his position in relation to the investigation of Chinese interference in the 2019 & 2021 Canadian federal elections. GoodDay (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic vandalism problem since May 31. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. persistent vandalism by ano ip and newly register users replacing content Lewolka (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Almost every edit from non-autoconfirmeds is WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Summer talk 12:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article has had pending changes protection since 2019, what exactly are you looking for? - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are no constructive edits from non-autoconfirmeds so I'm requesting a permanent semiprotection. Summer talk 00:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending-changes working as intended; not enough disruption to warrant semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of the same unsourced material by newly-registered or IP editors. Needs some time out. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you suggesting that the IP needs blocked as a time out, or are you requesting protection for British Rail Class 68, the page they edited once? - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doh!!! I'm really sorry about that. Of course, yes I meant British Rail Class 68. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With only 5 IP editors since September (and only 2 edits by registered users reverted this year), it does not appear to have enough activity to justify protection... - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP's making disruptive edits with the main disruption over the listing of Sunak's offices which are not many and are not causing any spacing issues by being at the top. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One IP editor per month (approximately) removes the content, and you come in later to restore your version (most recently reverting their edit over a month later) with zero discussion on the talk page. Does not appear to be enough activity to justify protection... - Adolphus79 (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And even soon enough, be it a week or almost a complete month, we'll be back here with this back and forth with these disruptive IP's who have no intention of using the talk page and are just ignoring edit summaries as to why their edits are being reverted. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what do you want then? We do not protect pages preemptively, there is not enough activity to justify protection, and you seem to have it very much under control. If you are upset about disruptive IPs editing a page once a month, ignoring edit summaries, and not using talk pages, that alone is not justification under the protection policy, otherwise half the project would be indef protected. I also can't find where you have made a single edit on the talk page to discuss this either... But, I'm not an admin, so I don't know shit about shit here. - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I never said I did. And yes leave this to admins. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No need to get salty, I didn't close the report, I'm not allowed to be an admin. All I did was make a note pointing out the protection policy and lack of justification for the closing admin. - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. IP edits are too scattered range-wise for even rangeblocking to be effective. It's whack-a-mole time. Lectonar (talk) 08:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism RedPatch (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A single IP has edited it in the last 16 months, no other apparent vandalism (only 8 edits since October), you should warn the user appropriately and/or report to WP:AIV if the disruption continues... - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP keeps removing sourced content. Please revert to a version before all this, I can't. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a single user editing today, last disruptive edit was a month ago. Warn user appropriately and/or report to WP:AIV if that doesn't work... - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected Lectonar (talk) 13:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit waring appears to be going on. LicenceToCrenellate (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that the warring party has since been blocked by JBW... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Indeed it has...Lectonar (talk) 10:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA vandalism - see WP:LTA/LB2. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 02:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Potential for Trump supporters to use the judge's information to use against her. Captain Almighty Nutz (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) 04:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I see no great disruption so far...but by all means relist if it picks up. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The personal below should have potential protection until a verdict is reached. Captain Almighty Nutz (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) 05:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. See above. Lectonar (talk) 10:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Public official who has been in media reports in recent days. Request temporary protection to prevent unauthorized edits, one had already occurred and took some hours to revert. Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption and WP:ARBAB. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. The timeframe for blocking IPs after ARBAB has closed since, so I think this should be judged on a one-by-one base. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing – See This AN/I post, the page has been brought up on Twitter and is a disruption target at this time. —moonythedwarf 13:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is experiencing a spill over conflict from the Dutch language Wikipedia. There, the article is already protected and an arbcom-case is pending.

I'd hoped the conflict there would not affect the editing of the article here, as the users involved were not overly active on the English Wikipedia, but to no avail.

One of the users in question, De Wikischim (talk · contribs) is subjected to restrictions implemented by the Dutch-language-Wikipedia Arbcom which forbid him to revert articles except in cases of obvious vandalism. These restrictions however do not apply to English Wikipedia, and at this point it is obvious that this user is trying to provoke others in breaking the 3RR.

I think it would save the administrators a lot of trouble, if they'd protect this page -- thereby forcing the participants to engage on the talk page.

I personally do not care which version is protected. This could be the version prior to major revision [36] / the version which makes use of the most source material [37] or the current version [38].

I do however request the administrators to readd the {{POV}} and {{Sources}} -taggs whatever version chosen (which were also reverted by De Wikischim, despite explicit requests not to do so [39]) so as to alert readers to the articles at various times quite dubious content.

Kind regards, Vlaemink (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The involved editors are all autoconfirmed, so semi-protection wouldn't be effective, and it's too early for ecp-protection. Discussion on article-talk has already started; pray continue this, and at need get a third opinion. Lectonar (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's adding death dates, disruptive BLP vio's........ect. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 15:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Asking for more than semi-protection. High volume of vandalism from a variety of newly created accounts. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. --Kinu t/c 17:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – All IP edits since mid-April have been one user evading a block to vandalise the lead. Belbury (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unexplained removal of cited material by German-based IP editor. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 14:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 80.187.112.0/20 (talk · contribs). Partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I know I filed a RFPP earlier that got declined, but WP:LTA/LB2 is back again and I think a semi would be helpful. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 16:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same IP Vandal has been messing with this page for months, and it has been protected several times before. I think it is time for an extended protection. Zingo156 (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Victor Trevor (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. – Favonian (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous semi-protected status recently expired, now various IPs have been removing descriptions of involved persons' race from lead sentence against consensus for inclusion, and not engaging on talk page when asked. Xan747 (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:58, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR, IP disruption picking up after usage as symbol by pro-Ukrainian Russian militia groups. TylerBurden (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: BLP vandalism by multiple IPs and several new editors. Adakiko (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Slow edit-warring between two users. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 13:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Seeing as other editors are working on the page, and the minimal protection history of the article, if the idea is to get these two editors to work it out on the talk page, perhaps it might be better to block both of them from the article until they do? Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by newly-registered editor and IP editors. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent LTA abuse. Loafiewa (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2001:FB1:14:1452:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent IP WP:OR related disruption continuing after latest protection expired, should probably be protected for longer. TylerBurden (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: The article's primary subject matter is that of a controversial comedian, and the page has been met with a barrage of unconstructive edits in the last few days, including today. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Beginnings of an edit war with a high level of vandalism from one particular user. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GuardianH

I request a page block for this user or an increased level of page protection.

Please refer to extensive discussion on this subject in the user's talk page on this topic. I have been in discussion with them and they appear to be selectively applying rules improperly for pages they do not like. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GuardianH Relativebalance (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Uni3993. Diffs: [40], [41], [42], [43]. Phlsph7 (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Same problem as with Thought: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. Phlsph7 (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13 June 2023

Reason: BLP IP vandalism has started again after recent semi-protect expired Eritha (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 01:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated attempts to insert material unsupported by sources by anonymous account(s). The edits have been reverted repeatedly, but a level of protection may need to be applied to the page until the deliberate insertion of false material about a sitting politician stops  – Sakura No Seirei talk 00:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 00:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Isi96 (talk) 00:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Slon02 (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Uni3993. Same problem as with Thought and Evidence. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Uni3993. Same problem as with Thought and Evidence. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unnecessary since it has been there for over 13 years, and the protecting admin (PMDrive1061) is no longer active on Wikipedia. RMXY (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I decided to err on the side of caution, so we will have a period of pending-changes protection which can slowly peter out. Lectonar (talk) 06:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 22 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Three transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 14 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 25 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 29 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 27 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Last one from me for now: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Six transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Sorry, here we go again: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 43 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Nine transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 12:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Six transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 45 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 24 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 37 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 15 transclusions, with no recent history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 45 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 37 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 25 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 39 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains. Fork99 (talk) 13:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 15 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains has 464. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains. Fork99 (talk) 13:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 18 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains has 464. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains. Fork99 (talk) 13:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 49 transclusions, with no history of disruption. Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains has 464. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 33 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 36 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. 42 transclusions, with no history of disruption. {{Transport for New South Wales railway stations}} has 402. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High risk template used in highly visible articles, but could be vandalised without any watchers realising; to be consistent with other Australian transport templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Four transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High risk template used in highly visible articles, but could be vandalised without any watchers realising; to be consistent with other Australian transport templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Three transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High risk template used in highly visible articles, but could be vandalised without any watchers realising; to be consistent with other Australian transport templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Three transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High risk template used in highly visible articles, but could be vandalised without any watchers realising; to be consistent with other Australian transport templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Two transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High risk template used in highly visible articles, but could be vandalised without any watchers realising; to be consistent with other Australian transport templates. Fork99 (talk) 11:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – This template is not used widely enough to be considered a high-risk template. Two transclusions, with no history of disruption. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: large amount of vandalism, edit warring, and sockpuppetry even after semi protection SKAG123 (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: User:Brightonwest1 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. That was on 7 June; the last sock before that was on 18 May. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and people adding low-quality sources from gossip magazines like People Magazine, Page Six, etc. Obversa (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, reluctantly. That claim was added over a month ago. Lack of recent edits in general. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That claim was also somehow not caught for a month, nor was the citation double-checked. This caused the false information to spread on social media, including Twitter, where I ultimately caught it and found it to be false. Obversa (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IPs making unsourced claims of death. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, as moot: the death is now sourced. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Page fully completed and may not be altered by IP users to something random as it has been experienced beforehand.Harshvardhan 1427 (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure this is the correct page? Target hasn't been edited since last June (6-20-22)... - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Non AC and IPs have barely added anything non-disruptive at all since protection was removed, likely because of the internet meme. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 05:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Apart from today's edit, the last disruption was nearly two weeks ago. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism upon vandalism every single time protection runs out. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Restoring the same edits made by a suspected sockmaster User:DiscoveryTeenHD. In the past, he vandalised this page with this edit (diff). LDM2003 (talk) 11:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 12:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several attacks this week, as the subject is in the news. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Very high level of vandalism over the past 24 hours.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One of those pages which receives continuous spam, requests for tech help, requests for help with non-wiki accounts, random nonsense, etc., amid a total lack of actual discussion about the article. The article history is just IPs and reverts, some of which could use revdelling (and not all of which are revdelled). Indefinite semi-protection seems the only way to prevent the inevitable future cases this talkpage seems to be inviting. CMD (talk) 00:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 27 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yaris678 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent blanking by IP hopping editor 2A00:23EE:1998:8CC2:74A3:84FF:FE57:44B2 (talk) 07:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism 84.9.224.117 (talk) 10:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Article has been deleted. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Uni3993. Same problem as with Thought, Evidence, Belief, and Truth. Phlsph7 (talk) 14:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism NoMoreBu11 (talk) 23:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent disruptive edits (back to April 29) all appear to be a single person. Warn them appropriately and/or report to WP:AIV for range block if necessary... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This may very well be the same person (geolocates to Brazil), but the IP changes so rapidly it is impossible to warn them. Simpler to simply lock them out.  MelanieN (talk) 18:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Immense level of IP vandalism doing steadily the same unsourced changes to the airline and destinations table regardless of being reverted. Has become almost daily now. Der HON (talk) 08:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism with always similar IP ranges vandalising the same content. There have been quite long page protections but vandalism jumps in right after they end.
Der HON (talk) 08:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism of the same IP-ranges. Page has been protected multiple times but always when lifted the vandalist(s) come(s) back.
Der HON (talk) 08:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to frequent IP vandalism ZangyPineapple (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent blanking from fans who don't like the conclusions of a reliable source (for example: Special:Diff/1159380703, Special:Diff/1159659129, Special:Diff/1159865381). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. It is now. MelanieN (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculative editing, IPs repeatedly adding Messi even though his contract hasn't started yet, and thus he isn't listed in the sources for the team. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The articles recent political topic may be still fresh in minds. While further talk page discussions are likely to help, some IPs (and some users too) seem to push their own preferred version, The article seem to need further discussion for better consensus. I would suggest semi-protection so IPs will have some encouragement to participate in discussions. ( I do not have any preferred version during protection period. Idk of of others) Bookku (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, I don't think semi-protection will accomplish much. Most of the back-and-forth, add-and-delete stuff is being done by autoconfirmed users. Somebody needs to start a discussion of the disputed issues on the talk page. And if that doesn't generate discussion/agreement, it may become necessary to full-protect the page. MelanieN (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Contentious topic that seems to regularly attract IP editors, see recent/current case of vandalism (edit: note that a 6-month page protection has just expired on June 8th). Preventing anonymous users from editing the page seems advisable to me. TempusTacet (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent IP editor already has a level 4 warning on their talk page, report to WP:AIV... all other recent edits (the other ~100 edits this month, otherwise nothing since March), appear to be a content dispute or edit warring between yourself and another registered user, you should report to WP:ANI... Page protection should not be used for settling disputes... - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not trying to settle any disputes through protecting the page against IP edits (if that's what you're implying?). There hasn't been any "edit warring" nor is there a conflict that would require an administrator's intervention.
My concern is that the topic, given the current political climate especially in the US, will regularly attract editors such as today's IP editor. If you feel that there is not sufficient evidence for this, please feel free to reject my suggestion.--TempusTacet (talk) 18:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't decline your request, I'm not allowed to use the template or be an admin, I'm just making notes to save the time of someone else that is actually useful to the project. And as far as the article possibly attracting future disruptive editors, we do not protect pages preemptively. - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I have a very limited understanding of how this process works and who can do what on this page. I've just seen that other pages that see similar disruptive edits have been protected and thus went looking for a place to suggest such measures. If experienced editors like you (or the people actually making the decision) feel that a protection is not necessary at this point I'm not going to argue against that.--TempusTacet (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am normally wrong about such things, but if you want, you can read up on the protection policy for future reference... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link! This page, which I've admittedly not studied in its entirety (just the section on semi-protection & Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection), is how I found my way to this request page. (Did you mean to say you're not wrong about the need for protection? No doubt that between the two of us you're the expert.)--TempusTacet (talk) 18:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm generally wrong about everything, and certainly not an expert on anything... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for my above comments, I have been informed that I am wrong again as usual, and should keep my future comments off-wiki... please ignore any and all suggestions I have made... - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In case it's relevant: A CTOPS notice has been added in the meantime: [44]--TempusTacet (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As a WP:CTOP action. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism RafaelTLS (talk) 19:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: KASHMIRI IS REMOVING AUTHENTIC SOURCES FROM THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION. The sources clearly state sufism is mainly a Sunni phenomenon. If one reads further down the pages info, one would have realised the Shia equivalent of mysticism is already mentioned under the concept of IRFAN. Hence making the page unbiased and non sectarian as the 2 main sects in Islam have their respective mysticism concepts covered Galaxy21ultra (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection. Lenzar (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – That page was clearly a misplaced (in article space) test. It's now been deleted, but it never was protected and neither is your "real" sandbox: User:Lenzar/Sandbox. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

14 June 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:11, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: Highly Visible Template. According to https://linkcount.toolforge.org/index.php?project=en.wikipedia.org&page=Template:Infobox%20rail%20service&namespaces= this template has 2941 transclusions, so it can probably be considered high risk. A similar template, Template:Infobox rail has a similar number of transclusions and has template protection so it would make sense for this template to be granted template protection for consistency. Jh15s (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Create protection: repeatedly recreated. Partofthemachine (talk) 19:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:14d:4488:185d::/64 (talk · contribs). 6 months. Title is nonsensical, so could be salted without collateral damage, but I would recommend against per WP:DONTSALT. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template; to be consistent with all other AU rail succession templates. Fork99 (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequently receives misplaced comments (specifically edit requests) from IPs and unconfirmed editors - see here onwards and here onwards. Requesting semi protection. Aidan9382 (talk) 15:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (On Vacation) 00:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Logged at CTOPS due to the long history of protections on this page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The two-division champion Amanda Nunes has recently retired, and it has led to some edit warring on whether Nunes is still the champion. Because the UFC still lists her as champion and has not provided any other clarification, all such edits should be paused until such an announcement is made. Savvy10 (talk) 12:06, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If disruption resumes, please re-file. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 23:45, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I know this page is protected because it was recreated after deletion discussion but this person may become notable in few weeks or months because of upcoming UFC 290 so it would be better to get unlocked for better editors to make page etc.. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 21:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no DeclinedWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tresean Gore was closed 2 days ago, and you already recreated it once. WP:DRV is the place to go if you have reason to disagree with the decision, not here. – bradv 21:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... for the bot. Favonian (talk) 05:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Personal attack and spamming, possible socking. Violates WP:TALKNO and WP:NOTFORUM. The Doom Patrol (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continously being edited with wrong info and no references by unkown IPs and new users. Justlookingforthemoment (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Today's edits (by you) were first in a month. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Migsmigss (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing in terms of unofficial club transfer rumors. Need protection until 30 June 2023. Sartaj267 17:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term addition of unsourced content by IP-hopping editor since August 2022, article has been temporarily protected numerous times and disruption has continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 06:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: Spate of bizarre vandalism from multiple new accounts. Not sure if it's numerology or SEO spam, but it needs to stop either way. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP sockpuppets of Uni3993/Blackpiller are engaged in WP:EDITWAR. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Uni3993. Same problem as with Thought, Evidence, Belief, and Truth. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP(s) continuously making disruptive, unsourced, and WP:NPOV-violating edits, even after being blocked. Lapadite (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pssst, @Euryalus, you forgot to replace "X" with the duration. Euryalus meant to write a month based on them protecting the page for that long. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blp troll. $chnauzer 06:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recently protected due to disruptive editing, these editors have returned when protection expired. Suggest long term semi protect. LibStar (talk) 06:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy- 12:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This tournament doesn't start for months, and the only edits are IP/new editor vandalism or pointless editing (like changing the order of teams to put their favourite team on top). No need for IP editing on this template. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some vandalism already occurring, spotlight in current media events with White House incident. 141.156.161.159 (talk) 03:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A fair bit of vandalism yesterday but it seems to have quietened down today. Please do re-report if it resumes. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Due to a very popular YouTube video featuring an injured Greg Jennings scoring a touchdown, this page receives a large amount of IP vandalism edits which quote or allude to the video. These edits are constantly having to be reverted by many different users, thus page protection would be extremely beneficial to this article. MiddleAgedBanana (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 10:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was placed under protection in 2010 due to multiple unsuccessful attempts at its creation. However, currently I am interested in creating the page, as I have gathered a plethora of reliable sources that extensively cover the subject. Given the passage of thirteen years, it is reasonable to assert that the subject has indeed attained a noteworthy status, thereby warranting inclusion on Wikipedia. Also, I believe that the ongoing protection may no longer be necessary, and its addition would serve as a valuable contribution to the platform. Himalayan7914 (talk) 09:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I don't think that the passage of a certain amount of time alone means that it is "reasonable to assert that the subject has indeed attained a noteworthy status". I suggest instead that you follow the process laid out at Wikipedia:articles for creation; if the draft is accepted, it's easy to unportect the article. Lectonar (talk) 09:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. Will follow AFC process. Thanks! Himalayan7914 (talk) 09:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:24, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Module:Adjacent stations/Sydney Trains. Fork99 (talk) 13:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because there are no vandalism till now and this page is now meets notability, and requesting it for protection under Extended confirmed user. 223.191.43.72 (talk) 11:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Block evasion, User:Blogs19. Favonian (talk) 11:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Highly used template, consistency with Template:Transport for New South Wales railway stations. Fork99 (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined "Consistency" by itself is not a valid protection reason, and "highly used" templates (unless substituted) automatically get semi-protected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. And ALLAH said, “Together we unite!” And there’s power. 13:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 142.47.234.86 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs, accounts vandalizing. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 18:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced genres to the infobox, as well as disruptive edit summaries. CJ-Moki (talk) 20:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP keeps changing the release date, unsourced. Been doing this for the last 3 or 4 days. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Someone named Akshaya Sreenivasan, likely an advertiser, has added advertising external links to this page. I removed them, and they have reappeared. Further digging through page statistics has shown that even larger edits have been done to stop the disruptive editing, but they keep reappearing. Roasted (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from socks of Piermark. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 18:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There's more vandalism to this article on a near-daily basis than to anything else on my watchlist. There is no good reason NOT to permanently semi-protect; no IP or brand-new user is ever going to show up out of the blue with some breathtaking new encyclopedic fact about Cheez-Its. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption since June 11. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as WP:AP2. For a lot longer than June 11... El_C 21:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Karim talk to me :)..! 00:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent disruptive edits by IP editors. One particular unregistered editor using multiple IP addresses (IPv4 and IPv6) keeps trying to shoehorn a descriptor for one particular character who doesn't really meet that descriptor (i.e. they keep trying to refer to Nani Pelekai as "overprotective") and most recently added in information about another character that is entirely false (they claim that David Kawena is Nani's ex-boyfriend and ex-friend when the film clearly depicts that they are still good friends but she's too busy for any dating). –WPA (talk) 01:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring by IP about a question falling under WP:GS/RUSUKR. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 21:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion from SanFranBanned LTA ByteOr. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 15:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated cite spam from IP address Michaelmalak (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of content - pov push. Semsûrî (talk) 10:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as WP:AA2. El_C 21:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: persistent date vandalism from different IPs. Was semi-protected several times before, now the vandalism has resumed. Also nominating:

-- Pgallert (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again already? Semi-protected for a period of 6 months (all), after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent block evasion by HaughtonBrit. Please see [45]. In particular I have blocked the 2601:547:b03::/49 (block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) IPrange for a month since almost all edits from that range since May 7 are by HaughtonBrit. This same IP range (2601:547) is currently unconstructively editing the Anand Karaj page. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism due to recent transfer. Current protection needed to be increased until the end of the season which runs till 30 June 2023. Sartaj267 11:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. El_C 21:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. Mainly an anonymous user keeps coming back to change release dates without sources and some other disruptive edits. Bowling is life (talk) 13:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism/POV editing based on non-RSes (see recent reports from the usual conspiracy rags [46][47][48] (no RSes)). and general pro-FRINGE BS. [49][50][51][52][53]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 20:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The Reverse Boycott at the Oakland Coliseum has fans excited and they have been vandalizing the page Mxbndr (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Kinu. El_C 21:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – dynamic IP attempting copy paste move - persistent. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:54, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Various IPs have been trying to whitewash the article since Friday.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – player is subject of transfer rumors, page is being repeatedly updated with as-yet unconfirmed information as a result. always forever (talk) 19:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. El_C 21:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15 June 2023

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism re: singles. Peterpie123rww (talk) 22:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent additions of unsourced/poorly sourced info. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikipedialuva (talk) 23:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 21:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 14:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 21:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time frequent target of IP and registered sockpuppets of Honduras200010. Largoplazo (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time frequent target of IP and registered sockpuppets of Honduras200010. Largoplazo (talk) 18:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 23:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 00:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP persistently changing DOB without valid reason. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 03:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned again after days since the protection expired. The vandalism is the same as before the article was protected. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 03:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP refuses to discuss, and is edit-warring to keep material in article. Should also be reverted per BRD, but I cannot as I would be at 3RR. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Vanalism OR/ unsourced by multiple IPs. Post Pakistani election. Adakiko (talk) 05:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 06:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/LB2. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Incessant disruptive edits. ℛonherry 14:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Courcelles (talk) 14:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. John Yunshire (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

semi protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending Changes Protection: A user who vandalised this article has been blocked indefinitely from editing, so there's really no need to keep the article semi-protected. Instead, it's better to configure pending changes protection, to prevent further vandalism. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Even though this one has been blocked, the general level of disruption is too high for pending changes to cope. Favonian (talk) 14:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This IP Address which vandalised the article has also been blocked from editing. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Living person. Greek public figure. Give exclusive editing rights to user Puresymphony Puresymphony (talk) 12:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PPINDEF Puresymphony (talk) 13:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined First, it's only a draft so far, second, nobody owns an article. Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, most likely from fans of a rival club, since the 2023 CAF Champions League final concluded. Ben5218 (talk) 16:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Pls add a page about Kogama if you try it then you will know what to write pls add one 🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛🐈‍⬛🐈🐈🐈🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺 2404:4402:23F7:2B00:F00B:D9C1:8F28:6F7E (talk) 07:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you do 2404:4402:23F7:2B00:F00B:D9C1:8F28:6F7E (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – It is less than obvious what you want. There once was an article about KoGaMa, but it's been deleted repeatedly for lack of notability, including once as the outcome of WP:Articles for deletion/KoGaMa. In any case, this is not the place to request article creation, see WP:Requested articles. Favonian (talk) 12:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator DatGuy. Favonian (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cannolis (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor keeps removing sourced content, falsely claiming that it is unsourced; they refuse to use the Talk page, even though I started a section and invited them to it. They're now blocked (for copyvio) and are back to editing while logged out. Woodroar (talk) 19:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Per WP:GS/RUSUKR, should be restricted to extended confirmed. Vandalism has happened and will happen again, e.g. today [54] AncientWalrus (talk) 21:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Ad Orientem (talk) 21:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16 June 2023

Reason:Currently, there are three protections being applied on the page, two of which are dubious: Pending and Semi. Should there be only one of them? If so, please don't forget to delete either {{pp-protected|small=yes}} or {{pp-pc|small=yes}} template from the top of the page. Kindly consider.197.0.232.75 (talk) 20:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: See Talk:March 22#Addition of another birth for context. tl;dr: OP is trying to insert a birthdate, sourced entirely to sports statistics listings. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 22:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I removed the erronious template. It wasn't actually PC protected, its just a template. Article is still Indef Semi, and Indef/Sysop Move protected, which is the correct protection for this class of article. Requests for edit can be made on the article talk page. Dennis Brown - 23:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like pending-changes really was still enabled, surprisingly. I've removed it, although I guess it doesn't make much of a difference. ( Done again for the bot.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
?? I believe you, but maybe I wasn't looking in the right place, but it wasn't showing. Either way, thank you. Dennis Brown - 23:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just clicked the "change protection" button, which gave me a page like this one saying that "PC1: Review revisions from new and unregistered users" was set to "infinite". (And apparently there are as many as 46 others, too, if anyone thinks they're worth going through.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17 June 2023

Reason: IP Vandalism and Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War RowanJ LP2 (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per RUSUKR Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't a very long indefinite ... Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. One of the shortest "indefinite"s ever is followed by one of the longest "immediate"s. "When you say it's gonna happen now / Well, when exactly do you mean? / See, I've already waited too long / And all my hope is gone" Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting semi. Repeated nationality edit-warring by IPs Aza24 (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:OR by ip-hopper going back to May 17. Toddst1 (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2600:4040:A80C:F200:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. CastJared (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. mediafanatic17 talk 21:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: People keep adding DreamWorks Animation and Universal Pictures when they are not involved as DreamWorks ended their partnership with Aardman Animations. This is also vandalism. 2607:FEA8:761B:C900:4D55:A525:3045:39E9 (talk) 21:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lorry Gundersen (talk) 21:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Frequently substituted in deletion debates. At the least, bump it up to XCON. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 22:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 22:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One bout yesterday for the first time in two months, and nothing in almost 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism (unexplained deletions) since June 6. Original vandal has been blocked already, but multiple IPs continuing to do the same thing. R Prazeres (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 165.16.41.0/24 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps disruptively removing content from the article, even after having been warned. ThethPunjabi (talk) 01:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring by IP editor(s). Constant314 (talk) 02:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistently removal of content by multiple (likely same person) IPs. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 03:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Persistent unsourced changes, has been protected several times before. TylerBurden (talk) 03:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 04:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One user is repeatedly making edits that are not accepted by multiple people. User is using abusive language. User is making requests from a variety of IP addresses.

Thanks

PS This is the first time I've made such a request, I hope that I'm doing the right thing. Zin92 (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption not heavy enough to warrant semi-protection...I also revdeled some abusive edit summaries. Lectonar (talk) 07:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Extremely prevalent spam, no constructive edits by new users for as far as I looked (2 y). – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 07:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected The spamming is a recurrent problem, but not frequent enough to warrant semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:28, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject to IP disruption. It appears that it's bound to continue. StephenMacky1 (talk) 08:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also see below. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is an dispute over the inclusion of a vehicle on the list that has turned into an edit war between a number of editors. My attempt to resolve the issue was unsuccessful resulting in more edit warring. The dispute will need to be resolved by consensus and will take time. In the interim I would like the page protected to allow for that to happen. NealeWellington (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. this is already at the appropriate board; let's see how this plays out. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent COI promotion – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of biased editing, using of multiple accounts and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also see aobve. Lectonar (talk) 10:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA vandalism - WP:LTA/LB2. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. The two accounts responsible for this morning's (NA EDT; my time) edit warring have been indeffed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case Can you please look at this again if possible? Today morning WP:LTA/LB2 came back. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 17:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. In addition to this morning's socks being blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – SPI disruption from none other than the sockmaster itself. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 13:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 46.114.160.0/21 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. for three months Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familar enough with sandbox template pages to really understand if this fits the definition of a high risk template but the 16,000 transclusions seems important and I figured it'd be worth asking if edits like this are worth preventing. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clovermoss, there is exactly one transclusion, at Template:Checkuserblock-account/testcases.
Declined ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adding uncomfirm days and venue on the concert. Myrabert01 (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism for the last few weeks. BlameRuiner (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 16:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption, blp, politically-charged topic. ~~lol1VNIO🕯 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 16:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. WP:AP2. El_C 17:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, repeated large-scale undo edits contrary to Wikipedia:Reliable sources NelsonEdit2 (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Certainly not a "high level." OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 17:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This will get us through it and then to the aftermath. Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Someone is really obsessed with me (I kid). Persistent IP vandalism -- the IP makes what would be a reasonable edit, if it were sourced. But despite being reverted by several editors, just keeps at it. Dumuzid (talk) 17:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs, which has recently increased in frequency. Beccaynr (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And logged as WP:AP2 (submissions conflict). El_C 20:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page has been recently updated to include false information about the company and its board member(s). This false narrative is part of an online campaign to have the U.S., U.N., or other national/international actors include either the Company or its Board Members on sanctions list or otherwise cause negative consequences due to the heightened focus on Haitian entities and persons. With these extraordinary potential consequences for false information being posted, Wikipedia should protect this page from being used to spread misinformation. 75.149.240.169 (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, content dispute, the information was cited, and, in any case, I do not see any pattern of disruption in this article. Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Users have been removing the map from the infobox again, this has been an issue for a while from ethnic nationalists. Requesting page protection as sporadic disruptive edits on this page break out. (This page has been protected before). Noorullah (talk) 20:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CTOPS notice on talk page and logged as well. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Request for long-term extended protection. In relation to this recent sockpuppet investigation and these related cases, multiple sockpuppets have been targeting the article upon account creation over the past few years, and one was just blocked today for the same reason. In order to halt the efforts of this persistent sockpuppet, the article should be protected to avoid further incident. Unlimitedlead (talk) 20:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism إيان (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Knowledgegatherer23 (Say Hello) 20:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Logged at CTOPS and notice added to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Targeted by LTA Zoe Trent Fan🎤💍 21:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Both IPs that had vandalized the page have been blocked for 6 months. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 22:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 23:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will cover remaining time till event. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism just about every day. Second Skin (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA WP:ARBIPA. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. LilianaUwU, it is WP:ARBIPA (specifically WP:ARBPAK), not WP:ARBPIA (Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles). El_C 02:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 23:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator LuK3. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism associated with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iran Turkey war. Lauda Air Flight 004 has similarly been pending protected. Fork99 (talk) 00:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People arguing about his nationality and the classic football/soccer debate. Nswix (talk) 01:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sockpuppet user is disrupting the article saying (Iranians onboard were fake). 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 01:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: per WP:GS/RUSUKR: related to Russo-Ukrainian War. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I see some recent reverts and partial reverts, but all the users involved are already extended-confirmed, so WP:ECP would have no effect, if that was the reason for this request. El_C 02:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism when it comes to the languages the film was made in. SP013 (talk) 03:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Unregistered users making wrong editions. Babid (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only half a dozen edits in last month, including one by an IP which was not WP:VAND. Johnuniq (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Constant vandalism by trolls. Babid (talk) 03:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Every IP edit over the last month has disrupted the infobox, article was previously protected for 3 months because of similar activity. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 04:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is currently being edited heavily. I'd like to request for protection for control. Loibird90 (talk) 06:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 08:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Lets.Custodio_making_paid/ChatGPT_edits, User:Swift Researcher (blocked for promotional/COI edits to this article) appears to be hiring freelancers to edit this article on his behalf. Belbury (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: excessive vandalism by cross-wiki long-term abuse Sidowpknbkhihj (ja:LTA:HEATHROW). After the previous semi-protection was over in May, vandalism started again, so please semi-protect my user talk page. 郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 09:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive trollish edits by IP address accounts. Several attempts have been made just today to vandalize the page (likely by Azerbaijani trolls) following the player's notable performance yesterday. Aram-van (talk) 10:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. MOS should not be edited by users who are not extended confirmed. — kashmīrī TALK 10:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Puresymphony (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Collapsing as there is already a thread on the issue at AN. Keep discussion focused in a single page. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If an unknown IP 100.36.106.199 vandalises the article and deletes text, credible footnotes and images, this is not a case of breaching the Wikipedia rules?
Pls, enlighten me. Puresymphony (talk) 14:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can I discuss the matter with an Administrator on this subject? Puresymphony (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Ip users. L1amw90 18:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Doesn't need to be fully protected. Appears that there was promotional material added back in 2006, but don't see why this would have warranted full protection. Natg 19 (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @JzG:, who is no longer an admin but made the initial protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected I have downgraded to semi-protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the current protected article is clearly biased in its approach which is a sign that whoever is responsible for it being protected is not suitable to protect it. Therefore it should be edited in an unbiased manner or the protection be removed. Eliyahfeld (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: This page was protected under 500/30 under a contentious topic designation (COVID). The article also falls under another contentious topic (AP2). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:15, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. You presume to have knowledge of the minds of other editors. There is nothing preventing you from making an edit request on the talk page. The fact that you come here crying about "bias" is proof that the protection is working and the article still needs it. The place to work out issues with bias is the article talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He seems quite educated and qualified to make scientific and medical statements that he believes to be true. There shouldnt be condescending coments in the bio so thus its bias. 2603:6080:D600:1C95:9D32:7370:4FDF:C290 (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So you would trust a person with a doctorate in law to be a doctor? That seems like a critically bad idea. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 03:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Facts ≠ "condescension". And he's a doctor of law, not medicine. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 22:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Please unprotect, because protection is working exactly as intended". Guy (help! - typo?) 09:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Naming dispute leading to protection appears to now have been resolved - remaining 2.5 years of protection likely not required Tollens (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Ad Orientem:, who imposed this protection six months ago. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined This page was not protected over a naming dispute. It was protected due to long term pervasive disruptive editing/vandalism. My protection was the 17th(!) instance of the page being protected. Sorry, I am not sanguine about the odds of the disruption not returning if I lift PP. (FYI I am currently on an unplanned wiki-break so messages and pings are unlikely to get a quick response over the next few days.) Courtesy ping Daniel Case. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: It has been 8 months since the edit war I was involved took place. I have learned that evading a block is also not ok. If any page blanking, disruptive editing, or vandalism occurs on the page I will immediately notify an admin Masai Giraffe (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You were just unblocked for vandalism and sockpuppetry 3 days ago, maybe you've had enough favors for this week. At this point, keeping protection seems prudent and shouldn't stop you from editing as you already meet the requirements for semi-. Dennis Brown - 18:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article hasn't been vandalized for a year, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. Thanks for proving protection is working. Courcelles (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But why the unprotection of the article was declined. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 16:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article hasn't been vandalized because it's protected from vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{edit semi-protected}} Maguirethegoat657 (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please make an edit request at Talk:Kevin De Bruyne to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18 June 2023

Reason: Note: Page is already semi-protected but expiring soon. It was semi-protected upon my suggestion because there was too much edit warring and new account created to put distortion on it. However, even when the article is semi-protected, numerous registered accounts are edit warring over it. The latest was a user with a promotional agenda violating WP:SOAP and possibly WP:PEACOCK whom was banned and has a history of being blocked because of that topic area. Because of all this, I successfully managed to have the article being semi-protected for the second time. In the meantime lots of edit wars and issues continued with the article, so I told the protecting administrator to keep the semi-protection indefinite or keep it for at least a few years. If long time registered accounts are edit warring over this, all that would happen is the situation for this article would worsen with IPs and newer accounts being allowed to edit. Am I wrong? Sylvester Millner (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking for the current protection to be upgraded to EC and extended? Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case, I am requesting the current protection be extended indfinately for IPs and newer accounts. Because even in the current state, it gets edit warred over. So you can imagine what happens if the semi-protection ends. It just gets worse.--Sylvester Millner (talk) 01:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. I will log this under CTOPS, too. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Edit warring over a single paragraph. This has gone on for far too long. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 04:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 21:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Clovo (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. PhilKnight blocked at least 3 accounts and 1 IP address that were vandalizing this page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan, the page is still being heavily vandalized to the point of being hard to control. FatalFit | ✉   22:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. I was just about to protect it given the continued vandalism, but PhilKnight beat me to it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: An IP user keeps adding incorrect information Notrealname1234 (talk) 19:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Johnj1995 (talk) 19:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amount of meatpuppetry. LDM2003 (talk) 19:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of unsourced names of dead soldiers. That they died is sourced, but that they died in Operation Murat not. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also log this under CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism today be IP and newly-registered editors. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short protection against LTA possibly needed. Giraffer (talk·contribs) 22:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Keeps popping up on my watchlist, and 40 out of the last 100 edits have been reverted, which must be some kind of record. Article was temp-protected 5 times in the past half-year or so. I suggest making this one indefinite. DFlhb (talk) 23:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Relatively obscure chess player whose article gets a lot of attention due to the high profile of his son. Frequent vandalism, and privacy violations regarding his family. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA Piermark. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 00:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term target of vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 01:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 01:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Waxworker: There is only one set of edits recently and it is not clear (apart from being unsourced) that it's a problem. If you get two similar within a week, let me know and I will protect. I don't think doing anything now would have a material effect. Johnuniq (talk) 04:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by unregistered users. The users usually add words like "ji", "saint", "maharaj" to show respect to him and remove information about his legal troubles. They also add his own facebook pages, and website as source to dispute his legal troubles. Majority of these edits come from unregistered users.

While I have no proof of this on wikipedia, Rampal's company funds people to promote him on youtube, twitter, and reddit. It is possible that these editers are being paid as well. Kenm v2 (talk) 02:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Significant news coverage about a living person recently arrested; high level of IP edits making edits without proper sources (e.g., that the article subject was fired or has resigned) White 720 (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Huggins's resignation has been announced officially, and is now mentioned in the article with multiple citations to reliable sources White 720 (talk) 03:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Per the above and the most recent two IP edits (which are good), it looks like protection is not needed. Johnuniq (talk) 04:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - repeated POV-pushing, disruptive edit requests by non autoconfirmed accounts to change the title to "East Sea". -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 02:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Prodraxis: I see there is a problem but the most recent problematic edit was 12 days ago. Let me know if it flares up again. Johnuniq (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption from a block evader. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User changing IPs to delete same content. Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism (likely from sockpuppet). Wikipedialuva (talk) 03:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Request within own userspace - Fuerdai keeps on vandalizing it. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 03:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Indefinite is a problem given only two instances. Johnuniq (talk) 04:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because is not a vandalism i want to create an article about this MG Car ....... . 116.110.224.78 (talk) 06:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's recommend to create an account and make 10 edits in at least 4 days, then you'll be able to edit semi-protected pages like MG Marvel R. Let's wait until an administrator has reviewed your request. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Block evasion. Favonian (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection request to help prevent the page from potential vandalism in the future. Knowleche (talk) 23:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Bbb23 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Many edits by non-extended-confirmed editors. protected per WP:GS/RUSUKR. The person who loves reading (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Large volume of spamming and disruptions for a recently released film. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP userrs. TheHotwiki (talk) 08:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: They keep reverting changes from the 10k info of edits. 110.175.97.43 (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 09:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant IP vandalism. Nehme1499 10:11, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Iptesh Kumar Meher. Belbury (talk) 10:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive, likely COI editing now replaced with sockpuppetry. Article needs protection for a few days. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS/BLP notice to the talk page so that, if this recurs, any future admin can and should take that into account. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Notrealname1234 (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (Roundish t) 15:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Semi-protection - We've consistently had IPs/newly-registered drive-bys vandalise the page since the article they're really pissed about is protected already (as is everything else Ahmadiyya-related). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by socks of WP:LTA/LB2. JavaHurricane 15:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP Vandalism for Chart Twillisjr (talk) 16:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editwarring still continues after protection removal. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19 June 2023

Reason: As one of the largest MLB's franchises, Giants need protection from trolls and vandalizes as other teams already have these protections to prevent abuse. Babid (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Basketball-today (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Notrealname1234 (talk) 20:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. It's a new article and protecting it would negatively affect improvements. In addition, the main user vandalizing the page has been blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I reported before the vandal got blocked, makes sense Notrealname1234 (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Notrealname1234 (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Notrealname1234 (talk) 21:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Notrealname1234 (talk) 22:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 23:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jonas kam (talk) 22:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Notrealname1234 (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. But not gonna upgrade the protection due to just one (possibly even two) user(s). El_C 23:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Daily vandalism Korijenkins (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A bunch of IP addresses keep on adding a hoax "weekend edition" section on this article. This article has been semi-protected for the same reason for one month last May. - WayKurat (talk) 23:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism (misgendering) has resumed since previous page protection expired. BBQboffin (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected and logged under GENSEX. Courcelles (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ustaz Wadi Annuar (talk) 02:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No IP edits at User:Ustaz Wadi Annuar or elsewhere that I can see. Johnuniq (talk) 03:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Ustaz Wadi Annuar (talk) 02:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No IP edits at User:Ustaz Wadi Annuar or elsewhere that I can see. Johnuniq (talk) 03:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high levels of edit warring ongoing related to the status of Perry Johnson as a major candidate, the page has been changed 11 times in the last 24 hours Matthew McMullin (talk) 03:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article requires semi-protection for some weeks, because is constant vandalised. Babid (talk) 02:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Babid: The most recent IP edit was reverted although the change would not be regarded as WP:VAND. There are a lot of other recent IP edits but they have not been reverted and seem to be good. Please identify some recent problems. Johnuniq (talk) 03:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:HARASS by WP:SOCKPUPPET continue after semi-page protection came off few days later. It was previously semi-page protected for a month. — YoungForever(talk) 04:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive editing continue by sockpuppets again. — YoungForever(talk) 05:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry has resumed after previous protection expired. Amaury05:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of speculation and vandalism to BLP following press coverage. Egghead06 (talk) 06:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Req long-term semi protect. A couple of IP users have been involved in a slow edit war for some time now. (or just p-block the ranges involved, see if that'll do it) Thanks - wolf 06:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated changes to the ethnicity, particularly by IP users and new users, since November 2021 (but possibly earlier). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 07:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 10:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Incompetent new editor repeatedly adding unsourced and badly formatted content. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 08:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Massive amount of vandalism by multiple IP's and newly registered editors in past few days. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. El_C 10:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced material to a BLP by multiple IPs over an extended period of time. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Permanent Semi-Protection of all Iran-Iraq war battles: Persistent disruptions from unregistered users. Disruptions long lasting, sometimes for a span of months and are immediately disruption again soon after being fixed by unblocked IP's. A few examples, First Battle of al-Faw, Operation Dawn 5, Operation Kheibar, Battle of the Marshes, Battle of Mehran (1986).

I request the semi-protection of all articles in Template:Campaignbox Iran–Iraq War Ecrusized (talk) 11:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For all of them. Except for Battle of the Marshes, where there was disruption about a week ago, all disruptive edits were done more than a month ago; just the fact that disruption is not discovered does not mean that the page has to be protected. Have a look at our protection policy if you haven't done so already. Lectonar (talk)

Semi-protection: The article has a history of SPA/COI IPs adding promotional content and the IPs have been more active in recent days. GPL93 (talk) 12:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Cant seem to get meatpuppets to talk....perhaps this will help. Moxy- 12:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP users. Notrealname1234 (talk) 13:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high level of unsourced and unencyclopaedic content being added by various IPs (probably the same person) – PeeJay 13:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent edits by IP's and new accounts not following WP:MOS. Aintabli (talk) 13:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The page is being targeted by an LTA, see 114.76.236.154 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) now back as 114.76.230.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Continues to remove required parts of referencing and restore gibberish. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 13:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Enforce ArbCom decision about the Arab-Israeli conflict. All non-extended confirmed users may not edit pages related to the conflict, including this one. RomanHannibal (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. This is a standing restriction under ARBPIA, independent of the level of disruptive activity on the page. It is already indicated on the talk page and in the edit notice. Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism, trolling from Fuerdai. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 14:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: let me know if the duration is not suitable -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive editing and edit warring by an editor(s) with various IP addresses. Bahooka (talk) 14:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fuerdai. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 14:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary semi-protection due to somewhat consistent vandalism recently from IP editors. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/LB2. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 16:07, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, especially to the box office figures, critical reception and controversy-related topics. Several new or inexperienced users are altering the figures and data without reliable sources. Requesting for an extended confirmed or full protection. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 17:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The article is already semi-protected until December; it seems the editors are generally handling things quite well. And it is not certain that ECP will affect any of the existing editors. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The person is a disinformation expert, and there is a clear attempt to discredit their work, at least through this WP. I have reverted a couple of edits, and I wonder if the article can be protected for a couple of weeks. FuzzyMagma (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit wars, article has been hijacked by an editor (Kurzon) who several editors disagree with but he hasn't let up. We need time to build a consensus on what the article should be, and it needs to be protected to prevent from further edits. RedWater14 (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Hijack" is a loaded word considering I am the only guy in a while to do major revisions. It's not like I am getting in the way of your work. And there's no need to halt everything while wait for the bureaucracy to get off its bum, we can build a consensus as we go. Kurzon (talk) 17:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Worth pointing out that both users appear to have violated WP:3RR here. — Czello (music) 17:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing block evasion by User:Iptesh Kumar Meher. Belbury (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the ongoing debate of whether or not Perry Johnson is a major candidate has resulted in the page changing 9 times since the previous protection was instated, I request that the protection be increased Matthew McMullin (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Matthew McMullin (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. for one month. BOOMERANG! Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Given his history (fourth block in the last two years and change), and that he has been made aware of CTOPS, I have logged this. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring and adding unsourced content by IPs in the 2A01:4B00:EC0A:8400 range, all located in Hammersmith, England. If a range block is preferred that might work. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No unsourced content was added. All additional content was fully referenced and taken directly from wikipedia's MBTI article. The section of the article which was edited does not, as it stands, meet wikipedia's policies and guidelines on neutral point of view, verifiability and original research, and Sundayclose has persistently prevented me from trying to improve the article to meet those standards, giving arbitrary and contradictory reasons for doing so. 2A01:4B00:EC0A:8400:1D0:148F:8A84:5188 (talk) 21:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism and POV re-writes MrEarlGray (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism OJDriscoll (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you revert to 18th June 2023 and fully lock? For 2 days? OJDriscoll (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
all they have done is keeping going- needs a full lock OJDriscoll (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Give up haha, its teenagers with too much spare time - its womens footballer moving to a rival club. Been heated on twitter. Once they get the message they will stop. Full lock it. OJDriscoll (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Arsenal WFC needs to be removed from the box as the current club. While probably correct it is not official OJDriscoll (talk) 20:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. after semi-protection had been proven ineffective. Click here to request an edit. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is disrupted continuously by the edit wars between various Indian caste groups. It becomes very difficult for the patrollers to keep a tab on it due to regular disruption. The basic pattern of disruption here is claims by various castes. This problem is perennial and hence needs ECP. -Admantine123 (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC). Admantine123 (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit since I protected ten days ago, and it was to restore the last good version. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: I have added a CTOPS notice to the talk page Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 June 2023

Reason: Constant IP vandalism of a current event. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:3D5F:F716:FC06:8038 (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The one below less so, but this is seriously getting pummeled. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:3D5F:F716:FC06:8038 (talk) 21:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The page has been moved to 2023 Titan submersible incident, FYI. Still in need of protection against vandalism. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:A5C8:50FA:2049:2767 (talk) 23:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined It was easy to semi-protect the related Hamish Harding below as the bad edits there were WP:BLP violations. The IP who added the squid joke four hours ago in this article has been blocked for 31 hours and I don't see any other recent vandalism. Ask again or let me know if specific problems occur again. No problem if another admin wants to semi this. Johnuniq (talk) 00:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was the right call last night, but unsourced crap is picking up this morning, so I’ve semied for a week. No template to not confuse the bot due to page moves. Courcelles (talk) 13:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Similarly, constant IP vandalism of someone involved in a current event. 2600:1700:87D3:3460:3D5F:F716:FC06:8038 (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor subverting consensus reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crank (person). The close doesn't preclude writing a new article from scratch, with a broader scope, but this editor is only interested in restoring the pre-AFD state. DanCherek (talk) 21:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated changing of LANGVAR, some other vandalism. RedPatch (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not really a content dispute. It's a Wikipedia policy to use American English for American people. What happening is you have some non-American (now using an account and multiple IPs) to just change it because they don't like the word soccer. I've seen several pages get protection for this same situation before. RedPatch (talk) 10:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined @RedPatch: I don't disagree with you, but this doesn't quite rise to the level of needing protection just yet. If there are more attempts to make inappropriate changes (especially if they're coming from multiple editors), please make another protection request. If the same editor continues to make this change, they'll likely be blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Some juvenile IP vandalism from a number of IP addresses in the last 3 days. Calistemon (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing against consensus by an unregistered user to restore their edits, their IPv6 starts with 2600. Linkin Prankster (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High chance of vandalism Exanx777 (talk) 06:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP Vandalisms. As soon as previous protection expired, IP Vandalisms restarted massively. I suggest to protect definitively the page by allowing edits only from registered users Riktetta (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism - page previously had a lot of irritating addition of poorly or unsourced content, and now protection has expired, it has started yet again. Vandalism. PeachyBum07 (talk) 10:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Duplicate of above.) Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP and new SPA vandalism. 2A00:23EE:11E0:97D9:1C0A:86FF:FE0E:877E (talk) 10:09, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 June 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism. The article has been protected many times. Users and IPs are warned, blocked and all procedures are followed, but once the protection is gone, the same issues return (removal of information backed by WP:RS without discussion, bias editing, etc). Coltsfan (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 13:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Constant whitewashing by multiple IPs and users over the last few years. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Since the 17th, there have been four reverts on the Trump portion that is sourced. I would suggest a temporary block for the IP but I can't really pinpoint the IPs to be one person except for maybe IPv6 2600. – The Grid (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism. This school has been caught in a tabloid episode around gender, which may or may not be to do with identifying as a cat. As this is a place of limited impact on the wider world, any wider interest should be gone in a few days. Unknown Temptation (talk) 13:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 14:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keep adding unconstructive contents. John123521 (Talk-Contib.) 15:41, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I know that Favonian has blocked 125.212.156.0/24 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) from the article for three months, but other IPs have been used. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Inappropriate use of user talk page while range-blocked. Tropicalkitty (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. TPA for the range removed. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:52, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:43, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. After reviewing this, I think I need to suggest reviewing WP:DNB and WP:WAR. These appear to be good faith edits that have been reverted 3 times and the level of warning you left the editor seems excessive. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk My Edits 21:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A discussion between competitors about whose link should be on Wikipedia. Two links should be deleted 83.41.37.27 (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., no such page has ever existed on English Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 21:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be related to Spam telefónico at the Spanish Wikipedia, so nothing we can do about it. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors keep misgendering Dylan Mulvaney and are adding some pretty nasty edit summaries. Page was protected until 2023-06-02 but abuse is still occuring. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 22:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's see if that's long enough, we can always extend if needed -- Euryalus (talk) 01:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for addressing this, I hope this whole thing settles down. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 01:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: WP:COI editors have noticed that the previous page protection expired.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Please follow the recommendations on how to handle COI issues. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 01:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Not widely use template only approximately 70+ transclusion. Vitaium (talk) 13:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 13:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Not widely use template only 82 transclusions. Vitaium (talk) 13:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ivanvector protected this one and the one above, so pinging him. Dennis Brown - 17:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ivanvector, I would be in favour of unprotection or at most semi-protection, given that previous community discussions had a threshold of 250 transclusions for semi-protection and thousands for extended-confirmed and template-editor protections. The transclusion counts for these two templates are still in the double digits and therefore don't even meet the first threshold. Even while giving leeway for administrator discretion, template-editor seems like far too much. Sdrqaz (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected Ivanvector seems barely active this month. As a temporary compromise, and to allow most folks to edit, I’ve dropped them to ECP on the chance there’s more going on here than met the eye. Courcelles (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: A user who vandalised this article has been blocked indefinitely from editing, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 15:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Several of that moron's socks have been blocked, but they keep coming and the protection remains. Favonian (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page (and related pages) have been locked down for over two years. A significant amount of new information has been published in that time which is being gatekept. Its time to unlock this (and related articles and allow normal editing to resume. DarrellWinkler (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose . The ECP is in place for good reason, and the article is actively watched by experienced users. If this supposed "new information" was due to be included, it would have been done so already, the fact it has not suggests that there is no consensus to include it. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no consensus to include any of the new information (of which there is a great deal) it because it conflicts with the positions the experienced users have taken on the article. This is not a private project, its open to everyone and there are established mechanisms to add content in articles. Lets use these as the project intended. DarrellWinkler (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined Nope. Not happening Courcelles (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page (and related pages) have been locked down for over two years. A significant amount of new information has been published in that time which is being gatekept. Its time to unlock this (and related articles and allow normal editing to resume. DarrellWinkler (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Courcelles (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page (and related pages) have been locked down for over two years. A significant amount of new information has been published in that time which is being gatekept. Its time to unlock this (and related articles and allow normal editing to resume. DarrellWinkler (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Courcelles (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page (and related pages) have been locked down for over two years. A significant amount of new information has been published in that time which is being gatekept. Its time to unlock this (and related articles and allow normal editing to resume. DarrellWinkler (talk) 15:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined And I think I’m going to topic ban you. Courcelles (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – I've seen in 2023 alone about more than 300+ edits, most of these edits are kind of a war edit, but not quite. They change it all the time but I think the latest version is the one which the more experienced editors agree on. I think this might be a PC? It's my first RPP, thanks. 多多123 () 19:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the editors involved are mostly new editors and IPs. It's not exactly vandalism, it's just disagreeing without any reliable sources. They change the wikicode around. 多多123 () 20:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. 多多123, that is not what pending changes (WP:PC) is for. It is to combat disruptive edits slipping through the cracks in low traffic articles. Here, this seems like a content dispute that should be discussed on the article talk page. So feel free to present your position there, if you haven't already, and also feel free to inform participants of that discussion attempt by linking it on their user talk pages, or even just linking the discussion in an edit summary in the article (even a WP:DUMMYEDIT would be fine). If there is no engagement in, say, a week, feel free to relist the page here again. If the discussion does happen but reaches some sort of an impasse, there are dispute resolution requests, like 3rd opinion at the minimum or Request for comment at the max that you could avail yourself of. You may also write a neutral request for assistance at the two Wikiprojects listed at the top of the talk page. HTH. El_C 04:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – This article is due to come off extended protection on June 23, but a perusal of ANI indicates that the disputes over it keep rolling along, making it highly likely that when the protection lapses the same content dispute will flair up again. This, then, is in the nature of asking for a pre-emptive extension of that protection. If that's something that's not generally done, I understand. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No, it is not usually done. Current WP:ECP (you wrote "full protection" in error btw) lapses in 2 days. If there's continued issues from non-extended-confirmed accounts at that time, feel free to relist for a longer protection. El_C 04:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: There is a person who all the time modifiy the page content about the party. Silvian69 (talk) 07:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Many attempts of unauthorized person to modify with wrong and inadequate text Silvian69 (talk) 07:23, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The redirect was only edited once: when it was created. Lectonar (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continued China related disruption after recent protection expired. TylerBurden (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not a good candidate for indef protection at this time, though (or even a lengthy one in the months and years). El_C 10:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Articles Ogeyslabe and Ogayslabe keep being recreated by the same person. They were both deleted with CSD G1, but he purposefully keeps ignoring it. It would be ideal to protect the page from being recreated, in case the creator comes back with a sockpuppet. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 09:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected indefinitely. El_C 10:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism Decky (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Despite warnings, IP address keeps adding content that denies her Indigenous identity, sourced to Tumblr. CT55555(talk) 13:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 97.111.201.5 (talk · contribs). Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended protection: Involved in a major conflict. CastJared (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CASTE disruption

Pages covered under WP:CASTE sanctions being targetted for quite some time by LTA Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. Requesting semi-PP for a midterm basis till this abates. Gotitbro (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. All. El_C 17:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Personal attacking on my talk page and sockpuppetry. WP:LTA/DTHD LDM2003 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 17:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unabating drive-by vandalism/disruptions mostly by IPs. Gotitbro (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Massive IP vandalism due to a recent possible unconfirmed transfer. Need protection until 30 June. Sartaj267 17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA Vandalism; WP:LTA/LB2 -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 17:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandal with IPs from Turkey has been deleting content and then changing IPs since June 16. Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: None of the IP edits over the past 3 months have been constructive. Article previously was semi-protected for 6 months (page renaming seems to have split history). SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Off-wiki WP:CANVASSING leading to WP:SPAs and ridiculous number of WP:NPA violations. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Closing admins are capable of spotting canvassed SPAs and giving appropriate weight to their !votes. There's a high bar for protecting AfD's, and these discussions aren't over that bar. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Off-wiki WP:CANVASSING leading to WP:SPAs and WP:NPA violations. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Closing admins are capable of spotting canvassed SPAs and giving appropriate weight to their !votes. There's a high bar for protecting AfD's, and these discussions aren't over that bar. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: I'm not sure what kind of protection would be appropriate to ask here, but this doesn't look like it's just going to stop. Pre-history:

temporary protection after anonymous edits [55]

new disruptive edits https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baccarat_(company)&diff=prev&oldid=1159932802

again https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baccarat_(company)&diff=prev&oldid=1161247969

link to talk:Baccarat. MartinPict (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism adding player of opposing team as owner after recent match. RedPatch (talk) 13:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Enforce ArbCom decision prohbiting non-extended confirmed users from editing topics about the Arab-Israeli conflict with extended confirming protection. Additionally, a non-XC user created the article. However, he claims that he forgot the password to his previous account. RomanHannibal (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 103.75.162.214 (talk) 17:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)registered users editing with wrong information So please remove the protection..that information to be correct..[reply]

We don't know what article you are talking about. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not unprotected – Neither target, nor rationale provided. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism, sock of Defeedme, block evasion. Wes sideman (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 172.56.160.0/23 (talk · contribs). – Favonian (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent unsourced/original research editing Ram1751 (talk) 18:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keeps adding scores of an ongoing match/es and as per WP:LIVESCORES it should only be added after the match/es ended. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 19:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism, including a serious BLP violation. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 22:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22 June 2023

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined The one editor who seems to have prompted this request is already EC, so this would not have any effect (and they've stopped). I don't see, at this moment, any editing in the last few months of history that stands out as disruptive. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. User:Namiba 21:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The most recent reverted edit looks like a good faith edit although lacking a proper source and perhaps somewhat premature. Please WP:ENCOURAGE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that last part was a bit too generous. It looks like the editor has already been warned twice about using sources. Still a good faith edit, but I left a second-level warning. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-profile article (company connected to the 2023 Titan submersible incident) receiving substantial vandalism from IPs. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 00:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because of the occasions where candidates need to be added on to the template and users with the power to edit it are offline and rarely use their powers. ....... . IEditPolitics (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There may be a good reason for that. The templates do not need to exhaustively list every Tom, Dick, and Harry who've declared; just the most viable/high-profile ones. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I reviewed the page history from 2021 the last time page protection was temporarily removed and I think it is best to leave this page semi-protected, especially considering the level of disruptive editing and vandalism on similar articles. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page was protected with ECP for an entire month which seems excessive given that the involved editors are not autoconfirmed and this is the first page protection. I'd like someone to consider reducing this to a shorter period of semi-protection. More at Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase#Urassaya_Sperbund. I didn't hear back from the admin that protected it so I'm putting this here before I forget about it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mildly, you didn't hear back from the admin that protected it because you only left your message about an hour ago, and your message didn't include a ping or a post to my talkpage so unfortunately I didn't see the message except by chance. One of the editors in the dispute is autoconfirmed, which was the reason for ECP. However, happy to reduce it to semi-protection per your request, and will monitor the page to see how it goes. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done @Euryalus: My bad! I shouldn't have implied that I had pinged you, I just wanted to close this out since I'm about to collapse for the day. Anyhow, it seems like we're good now since you've lowered the protection level to semi-protection so I'll also mark this as done. Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 05:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There seems to be some weird edit war here between a bunch of different IPs and new users. There have been more than 6 reverts just recently over the same bit of content without any of them discussing it on the talk page. Professor Penguino (talk) 01:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Added ECP to avoid privileging any autoconfirmed accounts. Both sides have sources at their disposal but we're in the realm of gossip journalism so who knows how valid they are. Either way, have left a message on the talkpage urging consensus rather than edit-warring. Let's see how that goes! -- Euryalus (talk) 01:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The use of ECP and the 1 month duration seem very excessive. The involved users are not autoconfirmed, the guide for ECP is quite clear that semi-protection should be tried first, and there's no reason for this to be 1 month in length rather than 1 week or less. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I left a request to reduce the level of page protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Euryalus has reduced the protection level. Favonian (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I believe most of the vandalism is from a set of related IPs which I have reported to WP:AIV for investigation. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason:

To whom it may concern:

I am requesting that the Wikipedia page of Hillary Ronen be given semi-protection status due to a consistent amount of vandalism for this year alone. Ronen is a living person and currently a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.

I decided to take it upon myself to write up and revise Supervisor Ronen's article to provide a more accurate reflection of her career serving San Francisco and to combat misleading info that has been plaguing her account for quite some time.

Four days after I wrote the edits, somebody tried to vandalize the article again using an IP address by inserting a section concerning her position on police funding. I have since deleted it. The edit made it seem that her position of not wanting to fund police made it seem that it led to an increase in homicide rates although the percentages for homicides were misleading (the actual raw number of increase were 7 and 8, respectively), and the budget actually increased by 4.4% between 2019 and 2022 (see https://abc7news.com/sfpd-budget-defund-the-police-department-funding/12321818/), making the troll's point misleading and inaccurate. Also, any reasonable person would know that a county supervisor does not have direct control over crime rates. The only article cited in that section was from Fox News, a widely discredited source of information. This has been attempted before as I have listed below.

Supervisor Ronen's article has been subject to multiple incidents of vandalism in the past by anonymous accounts, primarily those using IP addresses.

- Ronen's account listed her last name as "Ronenstein" for two weeks. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hillary_Ronen&oldid=1134653368)

- A controversies section was also created which listed misleading and even inaccurate information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hillary_Ronen&oldid=1136702718) The edits were later reverted citing vandalism.

- A section previously created in her positions on police initially derived from Fox News. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hillary_Ronen&oldid=1145946283). The only sources to mainly cover this instance are discredited right-wing outlets (i.e. Sinclair, Daily Mail).

For the reasons aforementioned, I am requesting that this article be given permanent semi-protection status. If you are unable to grant permanent semi-protection status, I request that you, at the very least, have the semi-protection status for this article last until January 8, 2025. Supervisor Ronen is term-limited and the date proposed will be her last day of office. Any efforts to vandalize her page by then will be moot.

SFHistorian1850 (talk) 03:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Daniel,
I am, very respectfully, a bit confused by the decline for my request.
Wouldn't the past incidents of vandalisms, most notably when the last name of the subject of the article was edited for nearly two weeks, already clear the threshold for page protection?
Does the repeated pattern on incidents by the sole use of IP addresses not give rise to page protection (please see revision history)?
Can you please provide more clarification on the standard needed to increase the page protection?
This info would be much appreciated. SFHistorian1850 (talk) 03:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please refer to WP:PROTECT for information on the criteria to protect a page. This article does not have enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection and this appears to be more of a content dispute than vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 22:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Donnowin1 (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting semi-protection to deal with frequent vandalism from IP editors that's been ongoing for months now. Hope I filled this out correctly. XeCyranium (talk) 05:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent vandalism in last 24 hours due to incident in last night's State of Origin series game. LibStar (talk) 06:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persisent violations of WP:BLP added by dynamic IP editor, despite the message at User talk:90.203.240.37 almost a month ago explaining why their edit isn't acceptable. Kathleen's bike (talk) 07:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 07:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism, violating BLP Zaian (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism by IP edits and named accounts. Changing BLP to past tense due to involvement with the "Titan" incident, citing an unverified source or none at all. Tytrox (talk) 10:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Political article subject to disruptive editing by IPs. D4R1U5 (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. And logged as WP:AP2. El_C 11:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level IP vandalism. Yet to work out how to do it, but I also want to nominate the other BLP pages associated with the Titan submarine incident for protection, for all the same reasons. Tytrox (talk) 11:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: constant vandalism to page 203.38.24.65 (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+1Reason: prevent vandalism Usher8701 (talk) 02:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Usher8701: Please discuss on article talk and consider whether WP:DUE is satisfied. Johnuniq (talk) 10:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Vandalism by IP editors and disruptive editors adding WP:OR. Raladic (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined @Raladic: It's not clear that the edits are vandalism. One of the recent editors is inexperienced but is auto-confirmed and would not be affected by semi-protection. There is nothing on article talk so please start there and try to engage others and possible a wikiproject. Johnuniq (talk) 10:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent infobox image change attempts by IP without consensus. Chronikhiles (talk) 09:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruption and edit-warring. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: per WP:GS/RUSUKR: related to Russo-Ukrainian War. The person who loves reading (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Activity, in general, is too low for the time being. Once a month is Stale territory. El_C 11:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended protection: per WP:GS/RUSUKR: related to Russo-Ukrainian War. The person who loves reading (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Similarly per my note at the protection request for 2014 Simferopol incident. El_C 11:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP vandalism that add either unsourced information or violate MOS:DATETOPRES. – Meena14:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by administrator Yamaguchi先生. Nthep (talk) 15:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: IP disruption, previous semi-protection was for 3 months. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Three days, not 3 months (May 25 to May 28), SNUGGUMS, and that was back in 2016. El_C 15:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I should've specified that it was an earlier protection that lasted for a few months, my bad. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Increased disruption due to Elon Musk tweet regarding the term. Funcrunch (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 15:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I am once again requesting this page be protected due to a major spike in bad edits, mostly if not entirely by i.p editors in the past 2 weeks. Pizza Tower is considerably viral media, which would make it more of a target for vandalism. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor reverting unsourced material to article. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ip vandalism. Deliberate factual errors. $chnauzer 18:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent inclusion over the past couple weeks of hyper-promotional text by several IPs and one user who has outwardly declared that the subject "demanded" these changes be made. Curbon7 (talk) 18:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nthep (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit war with user(s) adding in statements about Adam Schiff's censure that are not directly supported by sources. Beofett (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A lot of IP edits relating to a reported, but unofficial, trade. Natg 19 (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23 June 2023

Reason: There are users who enter the page and delete the data Hassancadde (talk) 17:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nthep (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A short semi because some IPs are removing well-sourced content. The Sao Paolo IPs suggest block evasion by a long-term disruptive user who has been using Sao Paolo IPs for years. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued IP disruption. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2603:8000:c33f:7eec::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism upon split of the article from OceanGate. Aeromachinator (talk to me here) 23:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 23:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and content dispute. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 19:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. El_C 00:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive editing has been ongoing for a while now. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of sports-related vandalism on a BLP. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Loafiewa (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs persistently trying to remove mentions of eastern Europe. Schazjmd (talk) 17:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consensus was reached that discriminatory language should not be used.

Therefore page protection should be used to prevent usage of the discriminatory word "myth". Thank you StopSayingMyth (talk) 22:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 22:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently deceased, current event related. [56] [57] [58]. Schierbecker (talk) 01:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP adding unsourced information. – Meena14:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated changing of terms despite WP:LANGVAR. I requested a couple days ago, protection was not granted was told to request again if continued. I put a comment on the talk page of the user who changed it (now a new IP - had used other IPs before - probably same person is making same edits). I had also put a hidden message in the code to not change the vocabulary. That was ignored with the most recent edits. Has been happening for over a week now with several users reverting each time RedPatch (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism at the conclusion of the last protection. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: One of the likely early picks in tonight's 2023 NBA draft. Can we semi-protect this article for the next 6 hours to prevent the inevitable childish IP vandalism that will appear as soon as his name is called? --bender235 (talk) 22:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. Could you then at least keep an eye on this article because the IP vandalism is all but certain to start around 8:30 pm UTC−5. --bender235 (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support request vandalism has started. RedPatch (talk) 01:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –♠Vamí_IV†♠ 17:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Does not quite reach the threshold for protection, either quantitatively (sheer number of recent disruptive edits) or qualitatively (the type and egregiousness of the disruption). El_C 00:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: high levels of vandalism after it expired, recently deceased individual who was on the OceanGate Titan. (edit - protected right after i posted this) requesting a semi protection. thanks! ♡Draco Centauros♡ (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism coming from various IP addresses. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Increased traffic on this page has led to more vandalism than usual, and there have been multiple vandals in the last hour. Professor Penguino (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined For a featured article on the main-page, this is really tame for now. If it picks up, please relist. Lectonar (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 06:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Requesting indefinite salting. Page has been speedy deleted four times for promotion. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 09:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add information on his forthcoming cage fight with Elon Musk. No, It's not a joke. See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-65981876 and https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/22/tech/musk-zuckerberg-cage-fight/index.html for confirmation. 92.17.95.131 (talk) 13:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We are not a overamped monster-truck rally commercial screaming SUNDAY, SUNDAY, SUNDAY! at you; this is something that should be covered when, and if, it actually occurs. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 15:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 64andtim (chat) 07:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 07:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Can somebody throw down a semi here? It's just open edit warring at this point. GMGtalk 11:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry – Norprobr has been busy in the last 48 hours (creating one sock after another). M.Bitton (talk) 11:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 11:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -Lemonaka‎ 08:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Video game developed by a Russian-owned studio, released around the one year anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Has seen plenty of vandals (on different sides of the conflict) that remove controversy sections. Perhaps a year long edit protection is a good idea. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockmaster Norprobr is using a seemingly endless supply of new accounts to continually disrupt the article. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: For a few years the user Esme Frost has either been adding unsourced or poorly sourced material to this article. I don't think warning this user will help because they've been warned numerous times in the past and they seem to be ignoring it. As a matter of fact, last fall they blanked their talk page. Kcj5062 (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: Esme frost (talk · contribs). Indefinite, partial block from the article, where "indefinite" should be interpreted as "until they are willing to formulate an adequate unblock request". Favonian (talk) 11:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – Change the move protection from semi move protection to full move protection because this page is a Wikipedia policy. Vitaium (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Last time this was moved was in 2012, and, afaik, there is no policy that says that policy-pages have to be to be fully (move) protected. Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by IP 117.*.*.*. Constantly removes changes with misleading description. Please protect the page from any further vandalism from IP 117.*.*. 96.89.37.1 (talk) 15:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Launchballer 12:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 13:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 15:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And logged under GENSEX. Courcelles (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article hasn't been vandalised for the last 7 years, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Hurrah! Protection works as intended. Favonian (talk) 12:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Accounts connected to the fraternity have been persistently removing information critical to the fraternity, despite being well-documented in reliable sources. PritongKandule-✉️📝 09:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 11:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing disruptive editing by sockmaster Norprobr. — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Also please consider edit warring noticeboard in similar cases. Less Unless (talk) 18:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've protected the three articles for 2 days each due to the sockpuppetry. This isn't an edit warring issue, it's widespread disruption. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing disruptive editing by sockmaster Norprobr. — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Also please consider edit warring noticeboard in similar cases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Less Unless (talkcontribs) 18:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Ongoing disruptive editing by sockmaster Norprobr. — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Also please consider edit warring noticeboard in similar cases. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Less Unless (talkcontribs) 18:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This article never vandalized, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 13:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done That page is not intended to be edited. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unregistered users adding unsourced release date. The same as the last page protection. Mike Allen 14:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced content again and again. Ajeeb Prani (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – several instances of IP vandalism today. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added CTOPS notice to talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent talk page ranting from IP editors. Just needs a short semiprotect until they get bored. MrOllie (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because this data is constantly changing, so if only certain people can edit it, the information may not be reliable. 2601:41:C201:6670:2183:6C31:F37D:A041 (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Unspecified page Courcelles (talk) 17:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the data, especially for modern games such as Minecraft, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, etc. Is constantly changing, so if the data is not constantly updated, it will not be reliable. 2601:41:C201:6670:2183:6C31:F37D:A041 (talk) 16:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Non existent page is not protected Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24 June 2023

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some really bad behaviour going on here with respected editors almost being bullied by others. Full protection would give the edit-warring factions time to cool off and perhaps even discuss on the talk page. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, the discussion on the talk page has been tense. But Exnihilox seems to have indicated they are satisfied with the outcome, and really the edit history, while it does have some strongly worded edit summaries, does not show much sign of disruptive back and forth. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I am totally fine with the current document. The active version now reflect more 'a Rochdale of 2023' compared to the original 2011 document. Yes, indeed the exchanges have been rather 'strong' - and some comments might be just in the nature of this kind of digital debate. I take a lot of responsibility for this. Though on review many of the 'disputes' have been fully resolved and I especially appreciated the user 'PamD's' contribution and guidance - despite some contention. The document is far more robust, far better supported and easier to read than it was three days ago. As a newcomer to the Wikipedia community - I fully comprehend I might be perceived as an outsider - I fully grasp many editors have been engaged with this project for many years. It has been a good lesson for me and I hope to contribute more to the areas I have a background in - this was very much a learning experience. Regards and thanks... Exnihilox (talk) 19:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs changing this spelling redirect to point to an unrelated page. NebY (talk) 21:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Please report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – GS:RUSUKR. HappyWith (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done and logged. El_C 23:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More information added to page. FromTheSoil (talk) 20:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent vandalism has gained some traction on twitter: https://twitter.com/OzarkChasers/status/1672109692154175489 And the controversy behind the tornado rating will lead to more trolls and vandals. Wikiwillz (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editor(s) from multiple IPs have repeatedly added a link to "ecuflash.co", a sales site. — Greentryst TC 22:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Editor(s) from multiple IPs have repeatedly added a link to "ecuflash.co", a sales site. — Greentryst TC 22:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Starring roles follow the order of screen credits. The sock Eswaran Naveen returned with unsigned IP Consistently being disruptive right now. Reverting the film cast.

[[59]]

[[60]]

[[61]]

[[62]]

[[63]] Nehansaxan (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Also List of Legendary Television programs List of Warner Bros. Animation productions and Skull Island (TV series). Requesting temporary semi-protection. Rotating anonymous editors persistenly adding unsourced information. Barry Wom (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 2804:14C:598B:81CA:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Many users have added useful stuff with source in past, but due to edit wars over adding the caste of subject, it gets deteriorated. Hence the pending change protection should be applied to differentiate between useful and disruptive changes. Btw, i have fixed the issue regarding caste with a reliable source, but I don't guarantee that it will remain there and no disruption will occur.- Admantine123 (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 20:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Semi-high level of disruptive editing resumed when the last protection expired. SurferSquall (talk) 00:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 01:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: And related pages. Now apparently, from various more or less reliable news outlets, an open battlefield between the regular Russian army and the paramilitary group Wagner. Both groups have been known to use various levels of disinformation, and inexperienced users may involves themselves as a third party by relating unreliable sources ; for all that, probably at least a semi-protection could be needed. Larrayal (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that pages aren't protected preemptively, but there's already been enough disruptive editing on this page to justify protecting it. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Daniel Quinlan. for four days. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Suggesting full protection to help form consensus. WP:CTOP area article. Since last month Imran Khan related articles have become more sensitive and can expect intermittent politically polarized contentious debates and edit wars. (Hence also suggest watch listing the articles) This time @ Imran Khan though users started discussion at the talk page, It seems well intentioned confirmed users from both side have not understood the point that preferably they form consensus at talk page first before editing the article. That's leading to situation of edit war. At this stage rather than action on individual users fully protecting the article may benefit consensus forming at the talk page, but still admins may arrive at better judgement after own visit to talk page discussion and article edit history. Bookku (talk) 02:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected for the duration (expires April 2024) and logged as WP:ARBPAK. Prefer trying WP:ECP before WP:FULL. El_C 03:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Match protection level with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Already template-protected, which appears to be sufficient. EdJohnston (talk) 01:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Short-term abuse. 2800:810:4C1:A502:31F7:A3CF:D95C:AC94 (talk) 04:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected indefinitely. and logged. Courcelles (talk) 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Some users keeps adding live scores when it shouldn't per WP:LIVESCORES. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 05:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I'd suggest leaving a note on their talk page in the spirit of WP:DNB. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I left a welcome and a note about live scores on the user's talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets the "Note" template as "Jury's still out". Favonian (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page has just been protected, but some vandalism remains: [64]. Please revert, thanks. 2A00:23EE:2610:548B:FC70:19FF:FE30:7707 (talk) 04:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done (non-admin reply) — SamX [talk · contribs] 06:00, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for the bot. Lightoil (talk) 08:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Full protection: Match protection level with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined - This module is already template-protected. This is the same level as is currently applied at Template:WikiProject banner shell. EdJohnston (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EdJohnston: The relevant template is Template:WPBannerMeta, which is fully-protected. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was coming here to make this request. The template is {{WPBannerMeta}}, fully protected and used on >10m pages. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 04:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because in 2008 that was the best call. Agree with @EdJohnston declining this. Courcelles (talk) 05:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistently been used for spamming purposes. Cahk (talk) 08:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedFavonian (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing IP vandalism (likely sock). Wikipedialuva (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protectedFavonian (talk) 09:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated BLP vandalism. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 08:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 09:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive removal of captions added to collapsible county table.

In efforts to make the county tables more compact at this and other United States presidential election tables – attention also to the 1976 and 2000 presidential elections in South Carolina — I have made the county table into a collapsible format, only to see it repeatedly changed back into its original format by a series of conflicting edits by 2600:1009:b10b:9b6:2da7:c49c:1b1c:7aa9, 2600:1009:B00F:9366:29BA:ADBE:C533:BD9D and 2600:1009:B055:ECBA:2D6F:1424:EFAB:F43C.

According to the manual at Help:Collapsing, when a sortable table is collapsed, a caption is recommended. I find that collapsing the county tables makes them much less dominant on the election pages, making for easier reading on both desktop and mobile formats.

I spoke to 2600:1009:B00F:9366:29BA:ADBE:C533:BD9D over a week ago but there has been no discussion of the points noted at the manual at Help:Collapsing. Luokehao (talk) 08:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes protection: Edit warring. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Seconded (but not for edit warring, edit: and I think temporary semi-protection is fine). A lot of vandalism by multiple IPs in the last 4 hours, likely due to their recent referee work at the Super Rugby Grand Final match.
2804:F14:80B3:CB01:F07A:DFF9:38C3:787C (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because possible vandalism on the article about Ben O'Keeffe is persistent by multiple (I count 8 IP Addresses) which vandalized the article. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 12:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If an administrator will block the IP Address which vandalised the article about Ben O'Keeffe (I have already reported that on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism), a blocked user wouldn't be able to edit the article again. Those users who need to make useful contributions to the article can still edit pending changes protected pages, but Semi-protected pages can't be edited by IP Addresses and accounts that are not confirmed or autoconfirmed (accounts that are at least 4 days old and have made at least 10 edits to Wikipedia). 178.95.99.242 (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for protecting the article, but this edit I think was accidental, it was previously reverted because it is unconstructive. Can you revert it. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: To Protect my user page from spammers Rolex2022 (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tropicalkitty (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article should be protected. The IP Address which vandalised the article has been blocked from editing for a period 48 hours, so it would not continue to vandalise articles. 178.95.99.242 (talk) 14:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This long-term pest has access to multiple IP ranges and throw-away accounts. Favonian (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive WP:POV edits by anon. IP range. A tag team of IP users have been changing the results in the info. box, without providing sources or discussing on the talk page. (The only edit summary has been the hubristic-sounding "I improved it by stating the battle was a British victory..") It took a long time to achieve a concensus version, and many discussions on the talk page. HLGallon (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Template used in multiple places and possible subject to vandalism 207.96.32.81 (talk) 12:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: possible vandalism 207.96.32.81 (talk) 12:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Courcelles (talk) 13:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This article has a very long history over many years of IP editors adding disputed, factually incorrect, and uncited information regarding equipment suppliers from China and North Korea. Talk page has reported this, and relevant IPs have been repeatedly warned - but they still persist!. Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 15:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Really??? Its edit history is flooded with IP edit vandalism and reverts! Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked. Anarchyte (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the blocks. More appropriate action, cheers! Militum professio scriniarii (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – As per WP:GSRUSUKR and WP:ARBEE. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GS/RUSUKR related disruption. Mellk (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This should be Indef ECPd. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of the request there was not so much disruption, but yes, now it needs extended-confirmed protection for sure. Mellk (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. per RUSUKR. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor persists in making changes but does not discuss them. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs are constantly adding unsourced material from mobiles so no notification will go though giving warning. Needed at least 1 month protection. DoraShin15, 17:35, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It might help to add an inline comment in the place(s) where they are trying to add unsourced material. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Seems like there's a dispute about content. Temporary full for now, and then back to ECP. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It doesn't look like it's affecting the article too much. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – continued IP replacing birth place, unsourced. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

25 June 2023

Reason: Persistent sock or meat puppetry. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just one instance today, and it seems like it's gone OK for the previous months. Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Geodram1 (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. However, your recent, undiscussed renaming of the article may be challenged. Favonian (talk) 20:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, primarily from IPs, within the past few days. Magitroopa (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Indef ECP. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism, insertion of unsourced info, and BLP violations. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will also log under CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: BLP violations, and disruptive edits over the last few days. Article subject was recently arrested on some very serious charges, which has drawn attention to the article. Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and logged under GENSEX at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent disruptive/unsourced editing since at least January 2023 Ram1751 (talk) 01:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and will log at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 01:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism RafaelTLS (talk) 02:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected – 1 month. Disruptive editing. EdJohnston (talk) 02:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – See Exnihilox's tendentious behaviour over the Wikiproject standard heading of "Demography". He/she is engaging in a ridiculous edit war with multiple editors, creating masses of talk page content and completely ignoring the opinions of other editors. This running roughshod over other editors is classic WP:OWN behaviour and it needs to be stopped. So we can consider a possible WP:ANI report (again apparently) or some 3RR detail, it would be useful to just completely lock the article to stop his/her disruptive behaviour. 10mmsocket (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I declined it yesterday (I think) because there wasn't a lot of evidence the article was being edited disruptively. I still don't. Exnihilox is being tenacious, and should tone down his edit summaries, but while strongly worded with a bit too much ALL CAPS he is not being uncivil or attacking anyone. As of this writing it has been almost 24 hours since he last edited the article. Some way to own it. (And as I noted in the last report, he had said yesterday that he's OK with the article as it currently exists.

Yes, the talk page is a different story. You have more or less accused him of not dropping the stick when he's one against many. But while we have protected many talk pages, I have never heard of an instance where one had to be full-protected (not saying it's never happened), especially when the article itself did not have to be. It's your and other editors' right to feel that Exnihilox is pushing his agenda too hard and too long, but he's still editing within the parameters of talk page use and acceptable user behavior (and it doesn't seem as if anyone's warned him in any way). That's why I think your best option here would be to bring in more editors through DR/N or another external forum—we're not to me really at the point of AN/I yet, and it's really outside the scope of this page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Daniel Case, I appreciate your wise counsel. As it happens the whole thing has imploded for poor Exnihilox as he foolishly resorted to sockpuppetry and has now been blocked. Happy to drop the RPP request. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:53, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to hear it. See what happens when they get enough rope? Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:GS/RUSUKR and/or WP:ARBEE. IanDBeacon (talk) 20:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Recent editing disputes are minimal, and they're about the flag. I will put a CTOPS notice on the talk page, though. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page might need protecting again, but to be honest it's more to do with the confusion over the current club. The current revision now is spot on, but club keeps changing despite him still being a Dortmund player till 30 June. PeachyBum07 (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Report when it does need it, if so. Daniel Case (talk) 01:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High level of IP disruptive editing. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 04:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism or possibly incompetent editing by several users. Sjö (talk) 05:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. The article has been previously protected many times and the vandalism resumed when the most recent semi-protection expired after 1 year. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article being attack by persistent user who’s now IP jumping. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It also looks like the most recent IP addresses used for vandalism have been blocked, but let's also lock it for a week. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And I come back to you now, at the turn of the tide. El_C 06:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One stage of your journey is over. Another begins. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: persistent IP vandalism. 2A00:23EE:1060:C165:F0DC:65FF:FEA9:3C5F (talk) 05:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 73.235.209.204 (talk · contribs). Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 09:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:17, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 09:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA page gets vandalized by LTA, more at 11. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP disruptive editing. Subject page is an actor who has been missing since Jan 2023. IP editors keep making him deceased although no declaration has been made by authorities. P37307 (talk) 08:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing by sockpuppet. HorrorLover555 (talk) 04:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:43, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (CC) Tbhotch 04:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 06:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Image-related vandalism. Somebody got the eye bleach?. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This page is consistently vandalized by someone (using a spambot?) who comes back with different IPs. This started in November of last year, it has been protected 3 times since then.
2804:F14:80B3:CB01:D427:B819:5DC8:2330 (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalising page Fieryninja (talk) 07:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 47.44.175.114 (talk · contribs). Report anew if disruption resumes. Favonian (talk) 11:15, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: GENSEX-related disruptive editing has continued from a new account and IPs, e.g. [65], [66], [67], [68] since page protection expired [69]. Beccaynr (talk) 12:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected and logged. Courcelles (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ADD the translation of 'Armenian Genocide' -- Հայոց Ցեղասպանութիւն -- to the first line of the article. Please note this is the Western Armenian spelling of Ցեղասպանութիւն. This should be used, rather than the Eastern Armenian spelling (Ցեղասպանություն), as it was an historical event that involved Armenians from the Ottoman Empire -- which are Western Armenians. Wiki4950 (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. @Wiki4950: Talk:Armenian genocide is "only" semi-protected, so you should be able to make the request there. Favonian (talk) 09:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Evasive IP hopper is reverting my constructive edits again; the page needs stronger protection. Vidpro23 (talk) 15:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 15:47, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Use and Reintroduce, of depreciated Sites RT/Sputnik by New created account. 1 2 Mr.User200 (talk) 16:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:GS/RUSUKR. El_C 16:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 11:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent edit warring from IP editor in the last couple of days. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism occurring due to recent announcements for the film. SP013 (talk) 17:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Subject to disruption by disruptive IP. It appears the IP is not gonna stop. StephenMacky1 (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (talk) 17:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level if IP disruptions and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 18:03, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Second Request for Protection. Some unknown IP keeps posting some unsourced inanity about climate change. I removed the controversy section to avoid this but new anonymous changes persist. Botendaddy 16:20, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. It's just one account, so not a protection matter. El_C 16:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Troll target. $chnauzer 19:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer rumours causing vandalism and disruptive editing. Protect for two weeks. Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it needs to be protected again after 1 week, please submit a new request. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

26 June 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism, intimidation, bullying and harassment of users making legitimate changes. All additions have been cited and sourced correctly from official sources from the club themselves. All guidelines have been followed correctly. Knowleche (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Filer is edit-warring with another user. Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
May I suggest full protection then? That way neither party can edit the article until they figure it out. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 15:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
User(s) blocked: Knowleche (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb23. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:44, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing TabooMatters94 (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Revert war for external link spam. –Vipz (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP and unconfirmed users continue to add information in the timeline about Jason White, who was only a studio member from 2012-2016. Users keep either removing him entirely or adding him to guitars and vocals from 1999-present despite the discussion in the talk page, and the concurrent note added in the "Members" tab as of the result of the consensus of that discussion on the talk page. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 23:11, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. There might be more going on here. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I investigated whether there might be some sockpuppeting going on, but I couldn't find any conclusive evidence. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Xexerss (talk) 23:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 2806:10A6:10:9F1F:D8A8:366D:63B4:C87A (talk) 00:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Explicit. Mifter (talk) 05:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 01:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced trade. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 15:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently expired semi-protection, disruption continues. Tollens (talk) 08:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 16:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Long-term abuse. 190.62.14.220 (talk) 12:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Previous blocked for sock activity for a month. Maybe a longer block is necessary. – robertsky (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ritchie333. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 23:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalism from IP/new users 175.159.181.65 (talk) 10:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism / edit without sources. Kistara (talk) 13:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Users, including filer of this report, warned about edit-warring. Bbb23 (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes protection: Contentious topic restriction. Clear abundance of vandalism from new users and IPs over the last few years. Apmh 14:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined No edits since May 25. Bbb23 (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent over-referencing by IP editors despite prior warnings. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 14:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hideki Tojo and others

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced category "Japanese anti-communists" by IP editors. Rotary Engine talk 02:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hideki Tojo Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kuniaki Koiso Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding unsourced info and making unhelpful edits. Paris1127 (talk) 04:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Johnj1995 (talk) 18:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. (Roundish t) 19:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article hasn't been recreated to many times. 93.72.29.12 (talk) 13:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected – Three times (the most recent two days ago) is quite sufficient. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent single issue deletion of sourced statement from unregistered user(s). Red Jay (talk) 06:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 20:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism. 2601:601:51C:125:31A2:D3A2:A692:465A (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 19:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: ECP is definitely not required here and I'm on the fence for semi-protecting this page. Most of the recent reverted edits seem to be good faith edits rather than vandalism. I'd recommend leaving notes on talk pages for any editors that are making disruptive edits. If there is a specific section that is attracting more disruptive edits, it can also help sometimes to leave an inline comment pointing people at a discussion on the talk page. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Many premature claims being made by anon editors while he's in the middle of talks with at least two teams. A day or two of semi-protection should do it. 2A00:23EE:16F8:5FA:CC83:BFFF:FE83:C9AA (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A long history of continuous page blanking by IP/new editors. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ip's keep adding Repetitive wording and repeated trivia to articles. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:26, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It looks like some Bulgarian fascists are trying to usurp this article about a North American fascist group to make it about themselves. (Or something like along those lines.) Whatever it is, it's nothing good. DanielRigal (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

27 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Curbon7 (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Short burst 14 hours ago and nothing since. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The page is currently the subject of numerous repetitive disruptive edit requests regarding the same topic as an ongoing RfC and is also receiving disruptive comments from non-autoconfirmed users (e.g. [70] [71][72]) Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and logged at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated disruption by different sockpuppeteers, edit warring with each other. Gotitbro (talk) 08:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. and logged at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring between different sockpuppeteers/sock IPs as can been seen in the page history. Gotitbro (talk) 08:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, I can see ... most of that happened three months ago. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism, often new users or IP users. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 22:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes this comes under a contentious topic, but the only serious disruption apparent in the history is the burst this morning; it seems like the editors can handle it. If by "disruption" you mean the AfD noms, that doesn't count. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing with no constructive edits from non-autoconfirmed users, pending changes expiring in a few days. Tollens (talk) 08:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LancedSoul (talk) 08:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. -MP1999 talk 13:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An anonymous editor in the 2601:285:100:4a60:X:X:X:X range has been carrying out dozens of inexplicable edits and then eventually self-reverts. It looks like the editor is experimenting, but it is disrupting the stability of the article. I was wondering if we could semi-protect the article for a few days in the hope that the editor moves on. Betty Logan (talk) 21:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Persistent infrequent vandalism, page has been protected in the past. Fork99 (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. "Persistent" it may be, but "infrequent" means it doesn't need protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Recent IP vandalism / blanking of information despite reverting. Initially by a specific user, but now by anonymous IP addresses. ClevelandUpdates (talk) 06:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two instances in the last three days. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing since at least the beginning of 2023 Ram1751 (talk) 21:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 01:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/LB2. Judging from the pattern we might as well semi all the other remaining dates in June as Lithuaniaball2 keeps on vandalizing it. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 16:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level IP vandalism and unsourced material being added by unregistered users. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Chetsford (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: The NHL awards were last evening, and this page has been under a barrage of vandalism by IPs. Semi-protection for a week's time should see that end. Ravenswing 04:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – All IP edits on this talk page since (at least) 2022 have failed WP:TALK, mostly because hapless internet users appear to mistake it for a chatbot interface. (Talk:ChatGPT had to be semiprotected for similar reasons a while ago already.). HaeB (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP address 2600:6C67:207F:CDDC:9033:B12C:A618:2D37 vandalized the article, and using RW, I reverted 5 edits by the IP and left a message on their talk page. YourLocalHoustonian (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: as an active and dedicated contributor to Wikipedia, I believe that having a protected userpage will allow me to focus more on content creation and collaborative editing without constantly monitoring and repairing vandalism. Thesaurabhsaha (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just looking over the contribution history, has anyone actually edited your user page other than yourself? Ravenswing 05:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per WP:UPROT, user requests for user page protection require "good reason or cause". There is no evidence your user page has ever been vandalized. Chetsford (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey,is it possible to to fully protect User:Thesaurabhsaha/Userpage.css from anonymous IP users or another user?
Thesaurabhsaha (talk) 05:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – See User talk:Candygummie/sandbox. Cahk (talk) 07:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creation protectedFavonian (talk) 09:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection:  – Persistent disruptive removal of references and improve templates by IP editor. Maungapohatu (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs trying to revert redirect in violation of consensus at [[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Cricket World Cup final]]. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., if after one year disruption resumes, and the situation has not changed, we will make it indefinite.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Protectedinterface ThisAccountIsGloballyLocked infinitely (talk) 09:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – OP blocked, locked and buried. Article is protected for a reason. Favonian (talk) 10:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Repeated Unsourced BLP edits — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) (talk) 09:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks vandalize SPI page, more at 11. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kpgjhpjm 13:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IP addresses immediately after protection was lifted. Bahooka (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock magnet.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock magnet. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock magnet.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Ingenuity. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Sock magnet.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: After a new trailer came out showing cameos from multiple YouTubers, several users quickly began adding these despite the lack of RS and after multiple reverts — VORTEX3427 (Talk!) 16:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator TheresNoTime. Favonian (talk) 16:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/DTHD, harassment, trolling. -- Prodraxistalkcontribs (she/her) 16:07, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by unregistered users. Shmayo (talk) 08:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I left a warning for the user. If they continue with personal attacks or disruptive edits, report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets the "Note" template as "Jury's still out". Favonian (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IPs and new accounts. Oh well, it was nice to be able to edit for a little while... 199.208.172.35 (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse. Came here to request the same thing. Folly Mox (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page seems to be a persistent target for vandalism/sock puppetry. It has resumed after the most recent protection, for 14 days, expired. TartarTorte 19:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Transfer speculation, nothing has been confirmed yet about this player moving clubs. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: High level of persistent IP vandalism, the previous temporary protection proved insufficient. Sutyarashi (talk) 17:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:41, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Lotta IP jokesters. 1TWO3Writer (talk) 18:12, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption over long period, requesting protection per WP:GS/AA. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 18:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 20:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Increase to XCP or TEP - Attempted hijacking (doubt it's intentional, given they attempted to self-revert) by an autoconfirmed editor. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User "John Yunshire" and user "118.71.62.22" have both been trying to revert to an older inferior article, and in the process, deleting [10,779‎] of properly sourced information. I am requesting for increased protection from vandalism and to keep the newest article edited by me or the one with the IP Address: 61.68.143.23. 61.68.143.23 (talk) 17:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Donnowin1 (talk) 20:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: HaughtonBrit's IP [73] is unconstructively editing this page again after the semi protection was lifted. [74] Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 12:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also put CTOPS notice on talk page Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

28 June 2023

Reason: High spamming from Ip. Many users trying to spam this page. Increase it's protection to 1 year. Rolex2022 (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 49.207.206.19 (talk · contribs) blocked by ScottishFinnishRadish. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistant sockpuppet editing this year. Catfurball (talk) 22:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Consistent sockpuppetry, disruptive and COI editing. See ANI thread. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 22:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing seems to have happened for a couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A company formed in the last few weeks with this name is attempting to hijack the article for marketing purposes. They have already blanked the original content and replaced it with a dubious history of themselves (which was reverted) 90.195.239.192 (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article hasn't been edited in almost two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – MOS:GENDERID violations. BangJan1999 00:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People keep adding the newly announced Superman film in the filmography, ignoring the policy of not adding films until filming starts. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 22:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I would recommend adding some warning inline comments in the filmography section linking the appropriate policy or guidelines. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent IP disruption/vandalism over a couple of weeks. Griboski (talk) 23:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Content dispute/edit warring. Multiple users repeatedly edit warring information with contested notability into article, despite attempts to discuss issue at ongoing discussion on talk page, with refusal to engage in meaningful discussion. Carter00000 (talk) 02:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You are in the midst of edit warring. Please review the guidelines at WP:3RR and stop edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Top-importance page MatthewMatt35 (talk) 03:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Acroterion (talk) 03:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions; plus, recent blanking of sourced info. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I also warned the editor about using proper sources. Report them to WP:AIV or WP:ANI if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: User:Regicollis/Userboxes/Socialist is way more used than [the aesthetically unpleasant] Template:User Socialist. We could move User:Regicollis/Userboxes/Socialist to Template:User socialist (move, not copy, for attribution), format it (I made an example at User:Est. 2021/sandUBX/socialist) and eventually merge Template:User Socialist into it. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Est. 2021: Template:User socialist has no protections that I can change or remove. Do you want it deleted to make way for another template? Also, did you contact the last protecting administrator MZMcBride? ~Anachronist (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Anachronist: It does not anymore. This issue has already been solved by another admin, that is Plastikspork. You can archive or delete this thread. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 15:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving.... For the bot, resolved, per above. Courcelles (talk) 15:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: New season began airing last night, and unsurprisingly, IPs adding original research. Magitroopa (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced transfer. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Frequent edit warring by IP to insert incorrect info against consensus discussion at project. oknazevad (talk) 00:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: As with the main article (see above section), frequent IP edit-warring to reinsert incorrect info against project talk page consensus and explanatory note. oknazevad (talk) 00:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Protection ended, and IP-disruption started fairly quickly. BLP-sensitive. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of vandalism by IPs & recently registered editors over the past couple of days.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – False info troll. $chnauzer 15:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection: Its almost 11 years this page has been protected and is no longer useful. Vitaium (talk) 11:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not unprotected. The recent declined edit requests on the talk page suggests that protection is still necessary. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Hancock

There is false or conflicting information regarding the use of incorrect words which creates a false sense of negativity around the studies of Graham Hancock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IronClan (talkcontribs) 14:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Use the talk page to make an edit request. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip's keep adding Repetitive wording and repeated trivia to articles along with other issues with edits. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 00:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, it looks more like a content dispute to me. Ymblanter (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – ip's keep adding Repetitive wording and repeated trivia to articles along with other issues with edits. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 01:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Indefinite semi protection: Indefinite extend protection is way too much and unnecessary. The original protection is semi-protection but was uplifted without expiry set. 2001:EE0:1A29:D78B:3DCA:DEFD:78E7:CA82 (talk) 09:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. ECP was applied because semi-protection was not working. Also read the instructions at the top; did you ask the protecting administrator NinjaRobotPirate about this? ~Anachronist (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: More than 10 vandalism editions on the last week. B777-300ER (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs from mobile. Comment has been put but they are not stopping. DoraShin15, 06:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent subtle vandalism by a multiple IP user. BilCat (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing JimRenge (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Joeykai (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: The article has been fully protected for 3 years, so there's really no need to keep the article protected. Also, those users who recreated the article have been blocked indefinitely from editing. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Protection is free. As this target has zero chance of being useful, there's not reason to remove protection. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A protection hasn't been for 3 years, and is no longer needed, because it's very likely that no user will continue to recreate it, as those users who created it many times have been blocked from editing. Let's give the article a second chance. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 18:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, per above. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistant IP disruption since at least December. Semsûrî (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also logging at CTOPS Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by multiple new users. Tammbecktalk 13:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Disruptive editing and adding of unsourced content as of late, mostly related to an ongoing trial (see Young Thug#Legal issues), related articles Young Thug and Gunna (rapper) are already locked. RoseCherry64 (talk) 19:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A single social media post reported the page subject had passed away. Subject keeps getting changed as deceased without cites. Both high level IP and what appears to be new accounts editors. Editors ignore WP:BDP at birth section and talk page. P37307 (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Warn the IPs and new accounts so they can be blocked if their behaviour continues on other pages. I'll look into dealing with them myself, but if they aren't warned at all, admins can only do so much. - CorbieVreccan 19:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP range changing sourced content (religious background) [75] [76] [77] [78]. This IP range is doing this in other articles as can be seen here [79]. Rangeblock is perhaps needed as well. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also logging at CTOPS due to frequent BLP vios and long history of this. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the Article being the featured, editors have been edit warring and changing the first article to blatant vandalism. Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 16:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs. CodeMars04 (talk) 20:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

29 June 2023

Reason: Ongoing edit war; image vote was made to keep the black & white images, I voted for color but the color images' advocates keep adding the color images while claiming that color won; despite the vote on the talk page totalling out to 4 black & white and 3 color. ~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 09:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add, most of these changes are made by IP editors. AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 09:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@AlaskaGal:, I'd suggest following the guidance at WP:DISPUTE. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:10, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Previous high levels of vandalism may happen again, best to leave the page protected CtasACT (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous ips coming and sugar coating the shooter's political leanings. $chnauzer 23:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected by administrator Isabelle Belato. El_C 02:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism in the month of June by various IP editors, including some serious BLP violations on 28 June. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Russia-Ukraine War policy. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう!) 01:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 02:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: increase of ip vandalism due to perfect game he just did HappyBoi3892 (talk) 04:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HappyBoi3892, please use edit summaries, so that it's clear from the revision history what it is that you are doing with any given edit. Thanks. El_C 05:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from several IP addresses. 64andtim (chat) 05:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 📖 (💬/📜) 05:09, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Duplicate. El_C 05:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Hanoi vandal. The /64 could be blocked as another solution. Binksternet (talk) 04:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. El_C 05:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: A new layout for all list of tornado tables on Wikipedia. Requesting a 500/30 protection so the page can’t be easily vandalized, but also allow for the visual source “copy/paste” aspect since the page is just table shells and layouts. WeatherWriter (talk) 05:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. El_C 06:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 06:54, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Asking for indefinite page protection due to persistent vandalism by IP user(s). The page has already been protected before several times. Sricsi (talk) 08:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It has only been protected twice, each for a short period. Protection has to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 10:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 09:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page was already helpfully re-protected by Floquenbeam after the expiration of the previous three-month protection immediately caused the unproductive IP edits to resume again with high frequency (like the previous four times. But a week isn't enough - these edits do not come from some sort of campaign, but rather appear to be made by hapless Internet users who mistake this talk page for the chatbot's interface. I suggest at least one year this time. Regards,. HaeB (talk) 08:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Not quite sure why Twinkle sorted this under "Decrease"; in any case this is about increasing the duration of the existing protection. Regards, HaeB (talk) 08:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. although Floquenbeam had just beat me to it, so I accidently protected over their protection, for a slightly longer period. He's free to revert, but they are close enough that I will just leave it. Dennis Brown - 11:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Security Concerns Jareerahamed (talk) 10:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 10:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page keeps getting proposed for deletion via WP:PROD every ~2 days for the past week. I'm not entirely sure the best way to deal with this, as the editor(s) who proposes all have different IP addresses. It's not per se vandalism, but it's a waste of time to keep removing the WP:PROD tag from this page, which is prima facie ineligible for PROD due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Smallwood, which was closed as a keep. TartarTorte 12:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 12:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: the article has been protected for 5 years, so protection is not needed anymore. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined as invalid request. This is a redirect that doesn't need editing and is a target for vandalism. Dennis Brown - 11:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 14:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – As the article relates to the incumbent president of Kenya on top of the recent persistent vandalism, it will only be reasonable enough to increase the page's protection. Volten001 17:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page and will log this action. Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article has for years on end been disrupted countless times by random IPs and new accounts. Can this please get a long protection?. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An IP keeps writing that "The Great City of Alexandria" is not biased and is his official title. Not only does this not seem true, but he also has no source to indicate so. Please protect the page. Sahas P. (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean semi protection, not full. Sahas P. (talk) 13:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated addition of fake ownership details (examples [80], [81]). Briefly protected in April, and the disruptive edits resumed three weeks after it expired.  AJFU  (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked. Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: False ownership details being added by IPs, going back to April (examples [82], [83], [84])  AJFU  (talk) 14:57, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Handled with an edit filter; ping me or re-report if that's not effective. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 19:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely., with CTOPS notice on talk page and logging under BLP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

30 June 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. 📖 TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 18:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 37.210.76.253 (talk · contribs) blocked by Drmies. Favonian (talk) 19:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by multiple users, but primarily IPs. Danners430 (talk) 22:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. However, note that some of the unsourced content is being added by autoconfirmed users who will not be affected by the protection. If the problem is serious and continues, I suggest escalating warnings on their talk page. MelanieN (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Transfer news. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated post by IP editors adding unsourced personal life facts and changing height in the BLP. Geoff | Who, me? 00:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Have an onging issue with a new editor trying to push a particular POV, which has invoved misrepresenting sources and insisting that sources are not required. Would like to have this forced to the talk page instead of the current mess with the article. Bilby (talk) 01:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will warn/explain to the user who is trying to insert their own opinion into the article. In the meantime I see that the two of you are engaging on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 02:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP range adding WP:NOTFORUM violations. DonIago (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editor. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism already started, and more expected due to transfer news. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP keeps adding unsourced information, appears to be WP:POV despite warnings. CT55555(talk) 01:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. (If they do it again, report them since you've already warned them.) Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've warned them. And now a new IP is doing the same. Hoping you might reconsider. CT55555(talk) 04:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I also blocked the involved IPs. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs edit warring. Nswix (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir there is constant false or defamatory content posted.
"Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, see this page." Usher8701 (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 13:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – People continue to ignore the instructions to not add a film that hasn't started filming to the filmography. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 14:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs (incorrect information and occasional vandalism). Examples: diff1, diff2, diff3, diff4, diff5, and diff6. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. qedk (t c) 14:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection Persistent vandalism and block evasion. 2601:1C0:4401:F60:758F:D0D6:53AE:83C1 (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Vandalsim

Dear Wikipedia Team,

I am writing to you as a concerned citizen and a fan of Soa Palelei, known by his nickname "The Hulk," to bring to your attention a significant issue regarding his Wikipedia page.

While checking his Wikipedia page, I notice that there is a potentially defamatory statement present on Soa Palelei's Wikipedia page, which falsely associates him with the Rock Machine Motorcycle Club. Soa Palelei vehemently denies any involvement with this organization.

The aforementioned statement undermines Soa Palelei's professional reputation and character, which he has worked hard to establish throughout his career. It is important to note that the newspapers responsible for publishing the original article making this false association have faced legal consequences. They were sued for their actions and had to pay a fine as a result. Additionally, they issued a formal apology to Soa Palelei for the harm caused by their story.

I kindly request that you review the article in question and assess the evidence provided to rectify this erroneous statement on Soa Palelei's Wikipedia page. As an online encyclopedia that values accuracy and integrity, it is crucial to ensure that the information presented on notable individuals' pages reflects the truth and avoids promoting defamatory content.

To support my request, I would like to direct your attention to an article from The West Australian, titled "Fighter Denies Bikie Link," which unequivocally states Soa Palelei's denial of any involvement with the Rock Machine Motorcycle Club. This article provides the necessary evidence to substantiate Soa Palelei's claim and disprove the false association present on his Wikipedia page.

Link for the Article: https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/fighter-denies-bikie-link-ng-ya-228379

I understand the immense efforts that the Wikipedia community puts into maintaining a reliable and trustworthy platform, and I believe that addressing this issue would further enhance the credibility of the information available on your site. I kindly ask for your prompt attention to this matter and the necessary actions to rectify the false statement on Soa Palelei's page.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a positive resolution to this matter, ensuring the accuracy and fairness of Soa Palelei's Wikipedia page.

Best Regards,

Usher8701 (talk) 05:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Iptesh Kumar Meher. Belbury (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User(s) blocked: 223.187.94.53 (talk · contribs) blocked by DatGuy. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent vandalism in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IP vandalism after protection removed. Given this page has been manually protected numerous times, could a higher level of protection be considered? MrEarlGray (talk) 09:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Logged at CTOPS, and a notice on the talk page as well. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Lithuaniaball2 LTA sock vandalism. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 16:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi protection: IP vandalism. Natg 19 (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 15:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kpgjhpjm 17:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Also put CTOPS notice on talk page and logged. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several new accounts attempting to add unsourced/promo/copyvio material over the last two weeks. --Finngall talk 17:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't help but note the irony of having to protect this page. But ... you can't really hash this one out on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high volume of disruptions for a newly released film. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 17:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll see how that works. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: sustained BLP violations, sockpuppetry, IP vandalism Tehonk (talk) 17:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page, given some of the edits that triggered this. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Also socking and trolling by Supreme Genghis Khan. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 17:53, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Supreme Genghis Khan target. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 17:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Persistent disruptive edits since the beginning of 2023 Ram1751 (talk) 18:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Adding unverified content, edit warring, undue removal of images. Migsmigss (talk) 11:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: IPs add unsourced material. Reverted several times by me and other user HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Prodraxis {talkcontributions} (she/her) 19:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors adding a new team, but nothing has happened so far. Kante4 (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated anonymous claims that the subject is dead despite no sources being provided and nothing found when I search Google News. Probable hoax. DanielRigal (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]