Talk:Tree frog

Me myself, as an entity capable of hammering on a keyboard, I think we need mo' betta writin' here, so people curious about the tree toads in their yard don't get all up in a fuss.

'Tree frog' = 'frog in a tree,' which is to be explained following, say.

Don't want to monkey too much with it myself right now, since the formatting and pictures and all make so many hearts melt, and I'm all about making hearts melt.

Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 23:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Why a disam page

I can't see why this is a disambiguation page when Tree frog is an article in its own right even though there are varying families or kinds. It's not as if "Tree frog" is also a band, a battlship or a place name as well. Anyone? Julia Rossi (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 September 2018

Please remove the unnecessary infobox which was unilaterally added by Bubblesorg without any consensus. The generic {{Infobox}} is not appropriate for animal groups, and the template repeats information already presented in the article body. 2001:569:782B:7A00:84A8:401F:FCAB:C36F (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Typo on main image caption

Is "European tree forg" Should be "European tree frog" Solar128 (talk) 04:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2019

The first picture of the frog says "tree forg" insted of "tree frog". Regards. Martinwiki (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for pointing this out, Martinwiki! aboideau^talk 16:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2019

When you type in "tree frog" from the index page (wikipedia.org), the auto-populated list to choose from has this article listed first. And instead of the classic summary, there is only the phrase "a tasty snack". Apparently their secretions can induce vomiting, which downplays any tasty-factor, but the point of the article is not focused on their culinary value. I don't even see the word "snack" anywhere in the article, talk, code, or history. Not sure how this can be edited, but can someone change it to something a bit more appropriate? 47.26.162.209 (talk) 11:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done, reverted vandalism at Wikidata. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 10 October 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

---

Tree frog → Treefrog – Treefrog is recognized as one word rather than two by many leading sources. For reference see principal databases like the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List (example: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/55687/112715618), Amphibian Species of the World 6.0 by the American Museum of Natural History (https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/Amphibia/Anura/Hylidae), and Amphibiaweb (example: https://amphibiaweb.org/cgi/amphib_query?where-genus=Hyla&where-species=versicolor). Many scientific journals also list this as one word like in ZOOTAXA 4104 "Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs" Duellman et al. 2016. Some species' Wikipedia pages already reflect this as well like Gray treefrog. "Tree frog" as two words is also sometimes still used, but it seems that "Treefrog" is more common. Me3420 (talk) 00:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). 2pou (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Discussion rather than an undiscussed move would probably be best for this. —BarrrelProof (talk) 01:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • This seems more potentially controversial than a purely technical matter. I'd say this certainly needs a discussion before a move. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose. Webster's dictionary and Dictionary.com have it as two words. And the Google Ngrams show a clear preference for it being two words. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose Per Rreagan007._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
• Oppose After seeing the Google Ngrams data, it does appear that although both terms are used, "Tree Frog" is more common in most works so it should stay as the page title here - although the page should continue to show in the first line that both terms are used. Consequently, I would like to propose changing Wikipedia page titles for individual species that show "Treefrog" to "Tree frog", like on the above-mentioned Gray Treefrog page. Me3420 (talk) 18:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Hylid" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hylid has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 17 § Hylid until a consensus is reached. Hedge89 (talk) 14:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)