User talk:CJ-Moki

February 2018

Hello, I'm IagoQnsi. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Todd Rogers (video game player), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Some random YouTuber making a video saying "someone told me this" is not sufficient evidence, especially for a potentially-defamatory claim. IagoQnsi (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Doom metal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 05:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Fun House (The Stooges album). Dan56 (talk) 05:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on Hell Awaits as being an influence on does not mean that it is Death Metal. Rob van vee 06:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your addition to Stoner rock has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Binksternet (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Narita (album), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 05:33, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The AllMusic page for the album lists progressive metal as one of the album's genres. Is the AllMusic genre listing not considered reliable? CJ-Moki (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only the prose is considered reliable, not the sidebar as per this. Rob van vee 06:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Derek Chauvin. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Eve 6. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 03:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uyghur genocide denial

A tag has been placed on Category:Uyghur genocide denial indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South Korean anti-feminists

A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean anti-feminists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

––FormalDude talk 07:09, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Holocaust perpetrators in Libya

A tag has been placed on Category:Holocaust perpetrators in Libya indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Holocaust in Libya

A tag has been placed on Category:The Holocaust in Libya indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Visioncurve. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Timur have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 08:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm reverting your changes to the section at Embassy_of_Ukraine,_Madrid#explosion as "explosion" is more accurate than "bombing" as it was an isolated incident. Scott the Reporter (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scott the Reporter: Hello! Your logic makes sense. Thanks, CJ-Moki (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being accepting of it and not starting a revert war, greatly appreciated! :) Scott the Reporter (talk) 06:55, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jaegaseung genocide

Hello, CJ-Moki

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Yue and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Jaegaseung genocide, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 10#Jaegaseung genocide.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yue}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yue🌙 05:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gamergaters has been nominated for deletion

Category:Gamergaters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zaathras (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Russo-Ukrainian war. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Targets of Gamergate has been nominated for deletion

Category:Targets of Gamergate has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zaathras (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pinky & Pepper Forever

On 23 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pinky & Pepper Forever, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pinky & Pepper Forever is a graphic novel that follows two anthropomorphic dog girlfriends through hell? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pinky & Pepper Forever. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pinky & Pepper Forever), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vylet Pony moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vylet Pony, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Snoot Game

The article Snoot Game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe this article does not meet the requirements of notability to justify its existence, this can be seen in all four provided references (and all sources available on the internet, for that matter) as none of them talk directly about Snoot Game, but rather talk about it in the context of its criticism towards [. Therefore I believe that keeping this topic as just a mention in GVH's article is enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Galo223344 (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Snoot Game article improvement

Hello CJ-Moki. We are both working to edit the page for Snoot Game. I'd be happy to collaborate with you to improve the article and provide an unbiased, accurate article for this page. Please let me know how we can proceed together to make an accurate and good faith article! StarmanSuper (talk) 16:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello StarmanSuper: With regard to making an accurate and good-faith article, the most pressing matter is following what the reliable secondary sources say about the game (see this discussion on the article's talk page). While sourcing requirements are looser for plot summaries (see MOS:PLOTSOURCE), the reliable secondary sources still have the last word in effect on what the article says about Snoot Game, its content, and its reception. CJ-Moki (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Snoot Game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snoot Game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snoot Game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Galo223344 (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Behind Closed Doors Mr. Krabs fellatio.png

Thank you for uploading File:Behind Closed Doors Mr. Krabs fellatio.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 09:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Rainbow Dash and Rarity 69 position.png

Thank you for uploading File:Rainbow Dash and Rarity 69 position.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

File:Barbenheimer poster.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbenheimer poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barbenheimer poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Behind Closed Doors (book)

On 11 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Behind Closed Doors (book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nickelodeon storyboard artists created a book with hundreds of pornographic drawings of SpongeBob SquarePants characters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Behind Closed Doors (book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Behind Closed Doors (book)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 18,321 views (763.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harriet Tubman folding chair.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harriet Tubman folding chair.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Behind Closed Doors (book) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Behind Closed Doors (book), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behind Closed Doors (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Montgomery Riverfront Brawl

Hello! Your submission of Montgomery Riverfront Brawl at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Leigh Chappell" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Leigh Chappell has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Leigh Chappell until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yaroslav Hunka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yaroslav Hunka, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaroslav Hunka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chase Shipman

A tag has been placed on Chase Shipman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Chase Shipman" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chase Shipman has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 28 § Chase Shipman until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tip (album)

On 2 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tip (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Canadian rock band Rainbow Butt Monkeys changed their name to "Finger Eleven" before releasing their second album Tip? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tip (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tip (album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nazi

Template:Nazi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Czello ^(music) 20:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Montgomery Brawl

On 7 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montgomery Brawl, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Fader praised "Montgomery Brawl" as "a hilarious recap" of the brawl and a "song a piece of history deserves"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montgomery Brawl. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Montgomery Brawl), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tip (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tip (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 03:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Just notifying you my review of the article is complete. Let me know if you have any further questions. I have sought another reviewer to assist me in deciding where to go forward. dannymusiceditor ^oops 07:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Refaat Alareer

On 11 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Refaat Alareer, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tip (album)

The article Tip (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tip (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Tip (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 03:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, CJ-Moki. Thank you for your work on Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Look What We Made Taylor Swift Do until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 documents

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 documents indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. FeralOink (talk) 08:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, Callanecc said that category is not an attack page. CJ-Moki (talk) 04:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I feel guilty... I never did this before. Please don't hate me?

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. FeralOink (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm worried that some of those edits that are BLP-related will cause trouble.-- FeralOink (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FeralOink: Thank you for the notice. I do not hate you. CJ-Moki (talk) 09:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Association football hooligans has been nominated for merging

Category:Association football hooligans has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedia vandals has been nominated for discussion

Category:Wikipedia vandals has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I'll steal it! No one will ever know!" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I'll steal it! No one will ever know! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28 § I'll steal it! No one will ever know! until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 11:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mike Collins (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I was up above it" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I was up above it has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § I was up above it until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27 § Opposition to feminism

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 27 § Opposition to feminism on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk · he/him) 20:42, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:South Korean anti-feminists has been nominated for renaming

Category:South Korean anti-feminists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heads of state who denied the Holocaust has been nominated for merging

Category:Heads of state who denied the Holocaust has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vylet Pony

Hello, CJ-Moki. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vylet Pony, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pro–nuclear weapons activists has been nominated for merging

Category:Pro–nuclear weapons activists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]