Jump to content

Talk:Nothing Else Matters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bif Naked Cover Version

[edit]

Not sure if this is noteworhty or not, but her cover was released as a single here in Canada and it had James Hetfield vocals also. I don't know if this was put together electronically or whether Hetfield actually recorded it with her (the album version is just Bif Naked). Just wondering if this notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.156.228 (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ballad?

[edit]

Metallica had ballads on their albums before, but I think it should be specified that this was a "love ballad" or at least a more typical one, as Metallica's ballads before this dealt with far more serious issues than "missing your girlfriend" (Sanitarium was about insanity, Fade to Black was about suicide, and One was based on the novel Johnny Got His Gun). So, the issue wasn't so much the inclusion of a ballad as much as it was the inclusion of what could be perceived as a "love song". Cronos12390 23:33, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Alright, I've made the revisions. If anyone has any disagreements, feel free to contact me on my talk page (I realize calling this a "love song" is a stretch, but compared to their other ballads, that's the closest word I could get for it.) Cronos12390 23:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Covers, etc.

[edit]

Live version with Chris Isaak on "Don't Call Us..." compilation... — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 17:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC) Um, that guitar solo waz played by hetfield not kirk. im changing that to hetfield ok. --76.113.62.128 (talk) 02:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The rest of the song is very difficult, though, at least for a beginner"

[edit]

No it's not! I could play this whole song straight through less than a few months after I bought my guitar. It's just natural major and minor chords, nothing hard at all. And I'm going to remove this statement from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PearlTheater (talkcontribs)

"A few months" means you're not a total beginner. Also, the solo isn't so trivial as you claim it to be. --Army1987 15:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone else think that this song has similarities to Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata? I'm not saying that Nothing Else Matters has anything to do with the Moonlight Sonata but I think there is the same "catch"... --Insist 13:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The minuet at the beginnigs of the second movement (labelled "Allegretto" in the score) is indeed in 3/4. However, that's about the only striking similarity I can see...am I missing something? --Klaws (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Power Ballad, No

[edit]

It doesnt make sense to put "Power Ballad" as a genre. There is no such genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kgardner1123 (talkcontribs) 23:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One hand but fretting the D-string?

[edit]

"Its intro is an E minor arpeggio beginning with E on the D string, open G, B and high E strings. It was first rumoured, and then confirmed by Hetfield on Classic Albums: The Black Album DVD, that he started composing it while he was on the phone with his girlfriend and only had one free hand."

If you only have one hand you can't very well fret the second fret on the D-string. The song is actually played by hitting the open low E. I am changing it. Raistlinx17 (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music Video?

[edit]

Why isn't there any information about the music video? Can someone please contribute some?

Information about the music video should be added...but NOTHING ELSE MATTERS!--The Legendary Sky Attacker 07:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cause there isn't a music video.--200.199.140.205 (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there's a music video, you dumbass, check it out in GayTube. 77.126.137.242 (talk) 12:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chart position in Germany

[edit]

Why does the article only list the chart position of the song in Germany in 2010? That seems only semi relevant to me and is a fact that changes. It's also not listed for the other countries in this way. Shouldn't the highest chart position be mentioned? The following source states that in 2000 the song actually hit position 2 in the German single charts. http://www.musicline.de/de/chartverfolgung_summary/title/Metallica/Nothing+Else+Matters/single —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.208.127 (talk) 23:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Removed: ", which is the anthem for the Q-dance event Qlimax" on the DJ Zany part, this track has not been an Anthem for Qlimax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.29.153.146 (talk) 01:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hammett did not perform on this song?

[edit]

Since when did Hammett not perform on this song? Is there any reliable source for it. I know the article says that it came from an interview with James Hetfield, but there is no source for that. And anybody could have just made that up and added it. So until a reliable source is found or shown, I am going to remove this. --Blaguymonkey (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC) I don't know, but I think some vital information could be obtained (including a citation)from the Classic Albums documentary on the album. To see it, you can easily find it on Netflix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.84.7 (talk) 22:31, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is talking about the Spanish Romance

[edit]

Big influence guys. Rubira study for guitar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.188.233.7 (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Italian singer Marco Masini...

[edit]

...also made a cover in 2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.34.11.168 (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

[edit]
Block evasion by User:Diskyboy
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

It seems there is a debate over whether this song should be classified as "heavy metal" or "soft rock". Both genres are drastically different from one another, so it's important we agree upon one to use. I'm personally in favor of soft rock, as the source that labels the song as such is more explicit, but it seems some think "heavy metal" is more appropriate. Personally, the source that labels the song this way doesn't seem explicit to me, it calls the song a "classic metal ballad" which may imply the song is a ballad by a heavy metal band, not necessarily a heavy metal ballad in of itself. I've removed all genres until a conclusion can be came to on the matter here. Carnivore82 (talk) 16:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody is 'genre warring' here and I resent the implication. Let's try again, shall we? Marcus Markup (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You reversed a sourced genre. That's what genre warring is. I disagreed with your reasoning for removing said genre, "remove new genre based on a source which is an e-book targeted to children written by a nobody." It's a book, and it's not self-published. Doesn't matter that it's targeted for children, a reliable source is a reliable source. If you wish to change the genre back to "heavy metal" you're going to need a good argument or possibly, a stronger source. Carnivore82 (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your source is not 'reliable' is my point. It's a shitty e-book. Get real, please. Marcus Markup (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about it being an e-book makes it any less reliable? It's still a secondary source that was released by a legit publisher. It doesn't matter how low quality you think the work is, by all accounts it passes WP:RS and if you wish to argue that, you're going to need a stronger argument than it just being a "shitty e-book." Carnivore82 (talk) 17:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are incorrect. The onus is on YOU, please read WP:ONUS and come back when you understand it; the part where it says, The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. Marcus Markup (talk) 18:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly what I'm doing by opening a discussion for others to decide and come to a conclusion on. You are just one person. You're going to need multiple other people to side with you before I drop my case. Carnivore82 (talk) 18:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You still don't get it. I require NOBODY to side with me. YOU, on the other hand... require at least ONE other editor who thinks your source is acceptable, and were I you I would not hold my breath waiting for that. Marcus Markup (talk) 18:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly am I not getting? If someone disagrees with my assessment, they therefore agree with yours. That is all that I am saying. I'm still not convinced on your reasoning for why the source is "unreliable" but that's for others on the talk page to come a final conclusion on. If that ends up happening, I'll gladly rest my case. Carnivore82 (talk) 18:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You reversed a sourced genre. That's what genre warring is. No, it is not. I am enforcing proper encyclopedic standards by rejecting your shitty source. Marcus Markup (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And I "don't wish to change it back to heavy metal" per se, I was just taking out the trash. To be perfectly clear. Marcus Markup (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up: editor has been banned as a sock... no further action required IMO. Marcus Markup (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]