User talk:Lenzar

(re: your edit summary previously, yes, removing things from your talk page, especially things other than warnings, is definitely allowed. Users may be encouraged to archive their pages instead, but ultimately, everything is in history)

Spellings

I dropped by to mention that colour should not be forked. Per WP:MOS, we realize that different readers prefer different spellings But ultimately, we all need to work together to improve the same version of the page, and ultimately, that means settling on a spelling, and stop arguing over it and move on to improving the article. Wikipedia doesn't prefer one spelling over the other, but it is generally unproductive to switch the spellings back and forth. --Interiot 01:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change spellings between varieties of English when there is not a clear reason to do so. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English for the relevant guidelines, and see Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars#Spelling for where such unidirectional editing ends up. Thanks,Banyan Tree 15:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor Football

There is a link for other uses of Indoor Football. Do not vandalize this article. P.S. English is also a language, not just a country.LightningOffense 23:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor American Football

I have proposed Indoor American Football for deletion using the {{prod}} template because it is a POV fork of Indoor football. I suggest you consider what BanyanTree said above, particularly with regard to National varieties of English on the English Wikipedia. Please try to work with other editors and follow the established guidelines with regards to language and spelling instead of waging a one-person campaign to "anglicize" the wiki. heqs 14:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to 1994 Fairchild Air Force Base B-52 crash (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Your] edit to CTRL-ALT-DEL (webcomic)

As I obviously have no source, due to Tim Buckley and his lackies deleting my posts, can I put that it is SUSPECTED that he bans people merely for criticising him? Lenzar (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Not really, no. Most people are aware of this, and by most I mean "people who know anything about the man/comic outside of what is said on his site". The thing is, there no source for it. I would say it could count as libel, but it's not illiegal to ban someone so it probably wouldn't even count as defamation of character without a source. It just can't be on here without a source.

I wasn't entirely joking about the journalist part. Find out what town he lives in, find some of the journalists there, and send them well-thought-out letters about the issue and Buckley in general. Unfortunately, until a reputable source says something about this activities, even if it only says they're "alleged", they can't be added to the article.Human.v2.0 (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lenzar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asmir Begović, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Lenzar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Broadside Boys

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Broadside Boys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Υπογράφω (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Lenzar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tabloid (newspaper format)

I am astonished that someone who has been an editor for as long as you have been, would make such a disruptive edit. What were you thinking?

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tabloid (newspaper format), you may be blocked from editing. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]