Jump to content

User talk:ClockworkSoul/Archive17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arbitrary break

[edit]

First of all, thanks for your reasonable reply. Here is why I call him a troll:

  • He keeps saying he came in response to a rfc, but also demonstrates no knowledge or interest in beer.

My take: he writes mostly about physics. If I were looking through the rfcs and saw one for physics, I wouldn't reply to it because it is a subject that I know nothing about and therefore would be in no valid position to comment.

  • He immediately said "include BJCP. I am new here and come in response to the RFC and see no sign of any real consensus in the discussion above. I have had a look at the BJCP site and although it is not perfect it is not, in my opinion, so bad that it should not be linked to."

My take: since he has never showed any knowledge of beer, how does he know that "although it is not perfect it is not, in my opinion, so bad that it should not be linked to."?

  • Despite being told that it is full of errors/flaws/whatever, he keeps supporting it.

My take: despite the fact that he reveals no interest or knowledge in beer, people who do know beer tell him of the flaws, yet he continues to say they are minor (how does he know that?) and that he continues to support it.

  • Yes, his speech is mostly civil and polite, but his actions are not.

My take: I gave a valid reason for the temporary removal of the bjcp link, yet he reverted it. Immediately before announcing that I was going to remove it, he and I had discussed the text that should go with the link. So he was aware that an explanation had been agreed on. Why then did he revert it? Why did he accuse me of edit warring when that was what he was doing?

  • When we had discussed the text, I basically used your suggestion but with more direct language. He said none of that was necessary, only to say it was a home-brewing club.

My take: the whole history of his participation here has been single-minded in favour of the link regardless of the arguments or suggestions put forward. For someone who has little to no knowledge of the subject, he is unrealistically insistent on inclusion of the link. He does not use reason or emotion to make his case, he simply says: it doesn't matter, the link should go in.

  • And finally: he says he came in response to a rfc. He did that over a month ago. Why is he still here?

My take: if he only came in response to the rfc, he would not have stayed so long. Clearly, he has another agenda.

Fair enough? As I have told you in the past, I (and Ron Pattinson) have been personally attacked and harassed by Goethean and various trolls. The attacks by Goethean lasted two years and no administrator ever stepped in. It became crystal clear to me that WP does not always live by its own rules and that sometimes, editors must protect themselves because, despite the rules, WP will not. It was clear that Lou Pepe and friends were genuine trolls because of their language. Martin may speak like a gentleman, but his actions clearly lack good faith and npov. I don't think he is a troll, but I think he is acting like one. Mikebe (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spammer

[edit]

Please take a look at the Hoegaarden brewery article. There seems to be a spammer with the name Betty Taylor who is putting in links to a site under the title "Dietary Information." S/he has violated 3rr on that article. She has put these links in many beer articles. Other editors have complained about her/him as well. I hope you can do something about this. Thanks. Mikebe (talk) 10:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In my defence I have never once violated 3RR - Mikebe is simply lying about this. You can easily verify this. I have added dietary and product information i.e. ingredient listings/nutritional information/vegetarian & coeliac suitability to articles about beers and the breweries. So far only one user other than Mikebe has objected to me adding this information and we reached a compromise to incorporate it into a pre-existing section. Mikebe has made no attempt to explain why the information I have added is irrelevant or come to a compromise and just keeps removing it. This in no way constitutes 'reaching a consensus'. Many articles about companies that produce consumables often include dietary/product/nutritional information about their products so I don't see why it is unreasonable to add it to a brewer article. Betty Logan (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go:

[[1]] [[2]] [[3]]

I've also filed, as you suggested on the admin noticeboard. BTW, how did things go with your exam? Or is it too soon to say? Mikebe (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad. She is now edit warring with someone else on the Hoegaarden article. Will you please tell her that she must not post this spam on the beer articles. I want to remove it, but she is always edit warring with anyong who disagrees with her. This must stop! Mikebe (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

[edit]

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost
ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost
From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday January 18th, Columbia University area
Last: 11/01/2008
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jwein

[edit]

Can you block his account for a while? There were already previous warnings, and given the nature of the situation on Janis Joplin, I think this time was quite deliberate. MMetro (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

[edit]

Ahh, the memories! I like looking back at old projects and debates now and then. :) — BRIAN0918 • 2009-01-23 20:14Z

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered at 03:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Cowboy Hats

[edit]

I am going to make changes to the Cowboy hat page see:text

-oo0(GoldTrader)0oo- (talk) 09:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exam

[edit]

Hope your exam went well! Splette :) How's my driving? 00:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You're invited!

[edit]
New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza


Next: February 6-7, at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum
Last: 01//2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical warfare

[edit]

I have nominated Chemical warfare for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

I wanted to say thank you for the effort you put into mediating the debate several weeks ago in Talk:Beer style. My participation was very limited due to time constraints and because it would have caused me more stress than it was worth, but I was peeking in on it from time to time and have noted that your contributions were invaluable in maintaining some degree of civility and resolution. At least for now, it seems; it appears the main opponents of the BJCP link have continued ranting on it. Not everyone in favor of BJCP has acted in a civil, exemplary manner either (you dealt with some of the offenders yourself), though I can't help wondering to what degree the behavior of the BJCP opponents has made the temptation to break the rules too much to resist by people who would otherwise be well-behaved contributors (I was getting a little tempted myself, which is one reason I had to step away from that discussion). Enough of my rambling... I just wanted you to know that your efforts in that situation are appreciated. --mwalimu59 (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Since you have edited at mutant page I presume you have a good knowledge of the topic. I have a picture of a dead animal that seems to be something between a dog and a bear, but I see no reference about it on Wiki. Do you know something about it ? Kindly reply on my talk page. Thanks  Jon Ascton  (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Picture

[edit]

Since I don't have the copyright, nor I know who the author is, I cannot put it up on Wiki. But for you I have put it here : http://www.khurmi.com/sqyy.jpg

 Jon Ascton  (talk) 12:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!!!

[edit]

So... I am on Wikipedia now. I realized how many times I signed into it to look up random stuff when I didn't want to bother taking out Robbins or Harrison's or other things. It's beautiful that I'm doing this when I should be studying for my exam. Alas, it seems like there are entirely too many things I want to do at once. Now I see why you're addicted to this. I think I'm going to work on cholesterol first as it pretty much has a lot going for it, and I do know a lot about cholesterol. Now the challenge is to get myself to study until the test is over. Could use some hints on not messing up every single edit I try to do:) Anyway, just saying hi! Unconventional85 (talk) 00:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. I was working on the cholesterol page yesterday and I was having problems with the references. They're kind of confusing because I think I probably replaced someone else's citation. But I didn't delete any of the other citations... so as I said I'm confused:) Also... I forgot how hard it was to edit stuff without destroying everything that was written before you. But it was really fun. I forgot how much I like editing. I re-did the function section. I guess no one's edited it back (and it's been almost 24 hours, so it might be okay. This "be bold" thing is kind of hard work:-D Unconventional85 (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! That comparing page thing is super helpful. I guess there's a program I don't understand as far as doing the references goes. I'll just assume that they're right when I do them. Cheers to not having to read the entire page again to find out where edits are:) Unconventional85 (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

[edit]
The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Sorry about that page edit i was recreating my own page using the same layout and i was using yours as a reference

Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 06:49, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

[edit]

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage template

[edit]

Hello. I'd love to use your template for my new user page, but I'm HTML...ignorant. Is there anyway you could transpose what I currently have into your format? My only preference would be that the colors for the template be black with a light color text. Thankyou for your time. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 04:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical warfare

[edit]

Are you still willing to work on saving this FAR? YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 02:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


You're invited!

[edit]

New York City Meetup

Next: Sunday March 29th, Columbia University area
Last: 01/18/2009


This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Javascript version

[edit]

Can this be converted to a javascript which can be used in similar fashion as friendly WP:FRIEND .yousaf465

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:51, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

[edit]

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday May 17th, Columbia University area
Last: 03/29/2009
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Brewbox templates

[edit]

Template:Brewbox begin and its various sister templates which form the "brewbox" infobox have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:37, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your redirect of Enzyme induction and inhibition

[edit]

A long time ago, you redirected enzyme induction and inhibition to enzyme inhibitor.

However, enzyme inhibition at the gene expression level is not covered in enzyme inhibitor, and the induction and inhibition article is meant to discuss enzyme regulation at the gene expression level, especially in the context of cytochrome P450 and pharmacology.

Therefore, I hope you can agree not to redirect this page. I've added a disambiguation link at the top of the article to clarify this. Please share your thoughts at the related AfD.

kindest regards, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBirthday

[edit]

I saw from here that it's been exactly five years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy first edit day!

[edit]
HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing ClockworkSoul/Archive17 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Call for opinion on a neutrality accusation in a human genetics related article

[edit]

As a fellow member of the WikiProject HGH may I ask for opinions on this accusation?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hey

[edit]

As you know, I'll be around NYU next weekend. Because I sort of always am:) Let me know if you want to meet up at some point. Unconventional85 (talk) 01:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]

Please see discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards#Proposed improvement of the History Barnstar. Kayau Jane Eyre PRIDE AND PREJUDICE les miserables 03:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks!

[edit]

Hi ClockworkSoul, I just wanted to say that it was really nice to meet you, and hang out a bit during the day at NYU. It was terrific to talk to a Wikipedian who is so eloquent and personable... nerd maybe, (we all are) but nerdy, no. It was excellent indeed to give the 3rd talk after your 2nd in the Panel at the Conference. I was fortunate to have 2 such great talks to lead into mine. I do hope your wife is going to start feeling better soon, and that she managed OK without you there during the day. I did not come to NYU today, Sunday, because I was just too tired. OK, so any time you want to get into a museum free, any museum, but especially the AMNH, where I can get 4 other people in for free including movies and special exhibits, just let me know. Or if you want to know more about gastropods! Ha ha. Best wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise - and I hope your projects go well, too. :-) GreenReaper (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto. I meant to ask you how you feel about community-enforced name changes, too, but didn't find the time ;) I hope we meet again, +sj+ 02:15, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, our panel simply could not have been better and smoother or more cohesive, or more interesting I think! Your data was fascinating! So, anytime at all I can take you and up to three other people into AMNH and get all tickets for free. Whatever I can tell you about invertebrate zoology I would be happy to. It's huge field of course and so therefore I know only a tiny bit of it. You are welcome to email me and I can give you our phone number. I don't work, so even a weekday would be good if you had a day off or whatever. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 00:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your presentation/paper

[edit]

Great presentation on Project lifecycles, do you have anything citeable? --Reagle (talk) 13:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just let me know when you've posted something. --Reagle (talk) 18:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

[edit]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 08:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

And you as well...

[edit]

Great to meet you as well, and I was sorry I didn't get the chance to talk to you more—hope to run into you at other events (in your copious spare time)! Cheers, Kat Walsh (spill your mind?) 01:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of WikiProjects

[edit]

During your research, did you produce a functioning list of the currently existing WikiProjects? —harej (talk) (cool!) 02:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What was supposed to be implicit in my question was, may I have a copy of the list, please? —harej (talk) (cool!) 04:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
messedrocker@gmail.com is good. —harej (talk) (cool!) 04:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibeer

[edit]

I imagine you already received several of these before, but what the heck, a couple of nice cold CG beers for you, made entirely from natural electrons. Best, Invertzoo (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fpadampunk

[edit]

Please, be my guest. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good job.  :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 02:46, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you aren't watching my page

[edit]

I have no objection to your blocking User:Fpadampunk as VOA. It does seem warranted. I have very little experience in the assessment of such things. I just didn't want you to think I was ignoring your post. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

[edit]

How do you make a section with a scroll down bar? I would like to have one on my user page for my Article Created section as it is getting to big. I have created a subpage for it, User:WVRMad/Articles Created but what do I do next?

Thanks, WVRMAD•Talk •Guestbook 16:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried that but seem to be doing something wrong.
I wrote this:
<div style= "height:20px; width:200px overflow=scroll;"> {{User:WVRMad/Articles Created}} </div>
But it didn't scroll.
Help! WVRMAD•Talk •Guestbook 09:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou, its great! If I change the colour or border I'll let you know!
WVRMAD•Talk •Guestbook 08:10, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why thanks!

[edit]

Sir/Madam, what a kind think to say!

You have an amazing memory, I might add. Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 06:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Random Systematic Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For being kind in a way that shows you're actually a thoroughly kind person Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 06:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject history

[edit]

Hi CS - sorry for the delay in replying but I'm travelling overseas at the moment (am typing in Ankara, Turkey at present). Wow, that's my first Barnstar in nearly 8 years of editing. I've made a note about the actual history of Wikiprojects here which you may find interesting. Nice work on the tabulation by the way. Cheers Manning (talk) 02:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:02, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

[edit]

Hi there, just to let you know I have improved my user page, have a look and let me know what you think of it.

Thanks, WVRMAD•Talk •Guestbook 11:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human papillomavirus

[edit]

ClockworkSoul, did you see my comments at Talk:Human papillomavirus? I want to make changes accordingly, unless you can add anything to the contrary. --Nbauman (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of beer styles

[edit]

What a crazy situation we're in with this BJCP war! It's been an issue out of all proportion of common sense for YEARS now. Both sides in the issue need their bloody heads knocked together and some strong beer poured down their throats. Be that as it may - how the hell are you? We only seem to bump into each other when there's a beer edit war going on! SilkTork *YES! 22:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:33, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

shure

[edit]

certainly, I like your concern and the soul you put in your words. I will put more attention to constantly share that though. If you think you can add a bit, please , I will welcome your suggestion how to improve myself, since there is no upper limit. Thank you for your vise advise. Xook1kai Choa6aur (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday September 13th, Columbia University area
Last: 07/25/2009
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference New York, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Takes Manhattan and Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, ClockworkSoul. You have new messages at Theseeker4's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AgainThe Seeker 4 Talk 14:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re [4]

[edit]

No worries, I hadn't interpreted your comment to mean I shouldn't have said that. And wow, I reached that conclusion without having any idea what Fences and Windows had been through... Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 04:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 31 August 2009

[edit]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 15:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only the Sith deal in absolutes...

[edit]

Which is why I'm not asking for any seeing as you must be busy with that real world thing you speak of and it'd be hard for you to come up with absolutes. Anyway, getting to the point, do you think you'll be getting back into developing Igor once more? The issues regarding it plain not working seem to have gone and I think it's too good a tool to just let languish in development hell. treelo radda 09:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Myoglobin entry

[edit]

I believe you are a primary author of the myoglobin article. I have a question for you on the topic which may or may not be appropriate for inclusion: In a rare steak, the red juices are mostly myoglobion, right? Is it safe to tell squamish people that myoglobin is not blood and that we should not call the juices blood? Could you answer via email: meathead@amazingribs.com 98.226.204.252 (talk) 18:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same IP left the same message on my Userpage. I sent an email, basically saying I thought there'd be some blood contributing to the red colour, and that whether it was safe was not for us to determine, and also directing to the Science Reference Desk. Let me know if you want a cc: or whatever. Wikipedia – always full of surprises :-) Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 06:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

[edit]

Great design

[edit]

Just passing by and wanted to say how great the layout of your userpage it. Fab. SunCreator (talk) 23:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

[edit]

Wikis Take Manhattan

[edit]

Wikis Take Manhattan
Next: Saturday October 10


This box: view • talk • edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

148 Lafayette Street
between Grand & Howard Streets

FOR UPDATES

Please watchlist Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

[edit]

You're invited!

[edit]

New York City Meetup

Next: Sunday November 15th, Columbia University area
Last: 09/13/2009


This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

[edit]

Sub-disruptive editors

[edit]

Hi ClockworkSoul,

Remember the discussion about Xook1kai Chao6aur from a while ago? I remember everyone being unsure how to deal with persistently "sub-disruptive" editors, to use your term. Just a heads-up, since being an admin I'm sure you'll encounter similiar situations again: there's a relevant essay, WP:COMPETENCE, which recently featured in a decision to ban a vaguely similar editor ([5]). Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 06:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

[edit]


File source problem with File:Sierra Nevada Brewery Logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sierra Nevada Brewery Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever (klaT) 23:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sierra Nevada Brewery Logo.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sierra Nevada Brewery Logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Esrever (klaT) 23:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

[edit]

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!

[edit]

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:

  • Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
  • Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
  • Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
  • Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
  • Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
  • Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
  • Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
  • Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
  • Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
  • In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges, iMatthew talk at 03:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, the flag you signed up with at the 2010 WikiCup Signups page was removed as it did not meet our flag requirements. Your flag must "be under a free license that is of a (current or historical) continent, country, state, county or city and has NOT already been chosen by another contestant. You may not use the flag of Mexico." Please return to the signups page and choose a new flag that meets these requirements. Thank you! iMatthew talk at 22:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

[edit]

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation! (reminder)

[edit]

To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup. Note: this is the same message from last week, but you are receiving it because you have not removed your name from the list yet! Please do so if you still plan on participating. iMatthew talk at 22:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Point Brewing Company

[edit]

Another editor has tagged Blue Point Brewing Company, an article which you created several years ago, for speedy deletion. - Eastmain (talk) 22:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

[edit]

This is an archive page. If you wish to leave me message, please visit my talk page.

And now, for FV's traditional last-minute nonsectarian holiday greeting!

[edit]
Here’s wishing you a happy end to the holiday season and a wonderful 2010.
Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ClockworkSoul/Archive17&oldid=1166515667"