User talk:Kenm v2

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This user trying to misbehave with us. The moto of the user is to criticize the user by spreading false info about fair user JamesJohn82 (talk) 08:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James, I left detailed notes about your edits on your talk pages as well as the articles in question. If you are not clear about any changes or reverts that I did, please feel free to ask. I noticed that majority of the changes you made were not following wikipedia guidlines so they have been altered or reverted. I suggest that you refrain from making accusations of disruptive editing as you can clearly read my notes on edits and know that they are not distruptive. Kenm v2 (talk) 08:26, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. JamesJohn82 (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions

Hi, most of your edits are only about something against the saint Rampal. (Not talking about the spammer case, but overall) That seems like WP:TEND. Or, you may be at the WP:BRINK of it. Try to make edits nuetrally here, or you may damage the project. Take it as a simple suggestion. :) 223.181.92.6 (talk) 13:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not sure you understand what above topics mean. None of my edits can be taken as tendentious. If you have any issues with any of my edits, please quote them.

Also, would you mind explaning how you found my account? and may I ask if this is your first account? Because judging from your knowledge of wikipedia, I don't beleive this is your first day at wikipedia. Kenm v2 (talk) 07:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Take, for example, your very last edit that I just undid. To the best of my knowledge and I also researched online, I couldn't find any reliable source saying that he was convicted in a 2006 case of the murder of his any female devotee. Because the 2006 case is only about the death of an Arya Samaji, not devotees. Do some good research first.

The other questions: Everything on Wikipedia is public. I don't think it should be any question as to how I found your account. And, no, that's not my first day. I am an occasional contributor at Wikipedia. I don't hold accounts, but using IPs. 223.181.92.6 (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, india today is a reliable website. Please provide a reliable independent source proving your claim and I will remove the line. Your revert has been reverted. Kenm v2 (talk) 22:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]