Jump to content

User talk:121.200.6.242

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Raydann. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gary Maas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 12:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Maas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 12:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DefenderTienMinh07. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Gary Maas have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ☀DefenderTienMinh⛤☯☽ (talk) 14:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to reply instead of undoing changes which have been made in good faith. The information that has been repeatedly removed (in my opinion vandalized) is accurate information and has a reference source. I believe it is being removed by people who find the information politically inconvenient. This is an encyclopedia, as you say, not a PR piece. 121.200.6.242 (talk) 06:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have marked the citation as being inadequate. The citation clearly shows that the intent of Gary Maas was to relocate at the time of the citation which is in following with the statement in the article. Proof of his current address would be trivial to obtain but I don't believe it would be acceptable to display such information for a living person out of privacy and security concerns. Please let me know what evidence you would accept for his home location that is in line with the evidence of location displayed for hundreds of thousands of other people on this site. 121.200.6.242 (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

121.200.6.242 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked due to being in an edit war which I have made multiple attempts to resolve via other means. I have tried to initiate discussion on the article talk page as well as the talk page of the user deleting the accurate and factual information that I believe should be included in the article. I have also engaged in discussion with other admins over the content which was modified as per their suggestions.

Decline reason:

Indeed, that's why you are blocked. Why should you be unblocked? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And re this: That still doesn't give you permission to edit-war, as noted above. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]