User talk:India2024
Welcome
[edit]Hello, India2024, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:09, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References== {{Reflist}}
- Thank you @Rasnaboy. Much appreciated for your warm welcome. Will be eagerly contributing more to Wikipedia.
- India2024 (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Bharat Vikas Parishad
[edit]Hi. I reverted your edits to this article because (a) we don't use Indic scripts (see WP:INDICSCRIPTS, and (b) the name of the country is India. You will need to use WP:RM to change the name of the article India if the name of that country has been changed to Bharat. RegentsPark (comment) 00:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- India and Bharat are names of equal status. Both are legitimate names of the country 'India', and citizens are allowed to use both interchangeably. Thus, using 'Bharat' is valid. For the sake of understanding of foreign users, I added the hyperlink to the article 'India' in brackets, for ease of understanding.
Kindly refer to the Article 1 of the Indian Constitution for reference. Revert for doubts if any. Thank you. India2024 (talk) 03:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a question of doubts or what you think. As I clearly say above, our article on that country is titled India. When that changes, you can make your changes. If you persist in using Bharat, you will be sanctioned.RegentsPark (comment) 14:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Stay modest, do not threaten others. Use your words using your brain.
- The rhetoric of the 'India' article is irrelevant, and unwanted, as India is also mentioned within the brackets . India2024 (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a question of doubts or what you think. As I clearly say above, our article on that country is titled India. When that changes, you can make your changes. If you persist in using Bharat, you will be sanctioned.RegentsPark (comment) 14:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
[edit]Hello, I'm DSP2092. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to GIFT City have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DSP2092 (👤, 🗨️) 09:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
RegentsPark (comment) 14:24, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- {{unblock| I have no idea who '2023Bharat' is. I am not a sockpuppet. This accusation on this page is "bad faith". Moreover, I have not misused or violated any of the rules set by the Wikipedia ~~~~}} India2024 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)