Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Shortcuts

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
```
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
```
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Template:Churches in Braga → Template:Braga (currently a redirect back to Template:Churches in Braga) (move · discuss) – This is the correct name for the main template for the city name "Braga" like all the others important cities in Portugal, where we can put the main topics of it, such as: Template:Guimarães, Template:Porto or Template:Lisbon. 44 Gabriel (talk) 03:41, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like "Churches in Braga" is an appropriate title given it almost exclusively focuses on churches, monasteries, convents, chapels, and sanctuaries... would it be more appropriate to create a new navbox at Template:Braga to make a more general non-churchy navbox about the city and leave the churches as-is? Just spitballing. RachelTensions (talk) 04:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RachelTensions: this diff is likely relevant. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 05:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on this navbox by adding other topics that aren't just related to churches, in fact I've already put the general topic above and the existing museums and I intend to add even more. Basically, it is to make this navbox, with a general name other than the current one, and make it a summary of the different themes of a city, from culture, sports, history, architecture, transport... 44 Gabriel (talk) 14:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Kabaddi World Cup (standard style) → Kabaddi World Cup (move · discuss) – This the only official world cup authorised by the international federation of the sport. The others are unofficial versions hosted in unofficial capacities. There should be a separate disambiguation page for the others. Kabaddi World Cup should feature the actual World Cup. OCDD (talk)

Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abhay Singh (squash player) → Abhay Singh (move · discuss) – Correct destination. There’s a separate disambiguation page for the disambiguations. OCDD (talk) 19:36, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OCDD: Can you justify that the squash player is the primary topic? JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 19:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The squash player is the most prominent of the disambiguations. OCDD (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 20:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deadair Records → DeadAir Records (currently a redirect back to Deadair Records) (move · discuss) – camel case title, similar to eBay – MW_(t•c) 00:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has been nominated for deletion, so probably any potential move should be deferred until that process finishes. There isn't a lot of sourcing on this anyway so hard to be sure what the most common capitalisation in sources is. — Amakuru (talk) 07:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed