User talk:Vanderwaalforces
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is Vanderwaalforces's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 | Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
 | Scam Watch
Warning: There is an on-going scam targeting people who would like Wikipedia to have an article about them. See this scam warning for detailed information. If you've been scammed please send details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org to help others who could be future victims of this scam. |
 Archives (Index) |
JZyNO
[edit]Being this was extended twice and an admin asked for source evaluation, I would request this be left open for an admin close. CNMall41 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @CNMall41, if you're not satisfied with the closure, I recommend taking it to DRV instead of discussing it here. As far as I know, the closure accurately reflects consensus. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I came here because it is a non-admin closure. As an admin requested the source assessment, it is clear that they should be the ones judging that for a close. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi CNMall41, I should revert my close so that an admin can close it with the same result? Please make this make sense to me. Whether an admin requested for a source analysis or not, they’re not going to rely their closure on their opinion of the source analysis but the consensus from the participants of the discussion. That’s how consensus and closures work if you ask me. So asking me to revert my closure is ridiculous, please. WP:DRV is always open if you want. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wow. Okay. Would have expected a more civil response. Didn't mean to offend you with the question. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do not misinterpret my message, I was not by any chance offended. I’m happy you got my message. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe I misread the tone. See below. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Do not misinterpret my message, I was not by any chance offended. I’m happy you got my message. Thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wow. Okay. Would have expected a more civil response. Didn't mean to offend you with the question. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi CNMall41, I should revert my close so that an admin can close it with the same result? Please make this make sense to me. Whether an admin requested for a source analysis or not, they’re not going to rely their closure on their opinion of the source analysis but the consensus from the participants of the discussion. That’s how consensus and closures work if you ask me. So asking me to revert my closure is ridiculous, please. WP:DRV is always open if you want. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I came here because it is a non-admin closure. As an admin requested the source assessment, it is clear that they should be the ones judging that for a close. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of JZyNO. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CNMall41 (talk) 21:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)