User talk:Kanyfug

File permission problem with File:Normani Hamilton, May 2019.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Normani Hamilton, May 2019.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email. I’m not sure if it went through or not though. Kanyfug (talk) 03:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Normani Kordei Hamilton, Nashville, June 2019.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Normani Kordei Hamilton, Nashville, June 2019.jpeg, which you've attributed to Emily. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:08, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop marking large additions of content as minor edits

This is not a minor edit. In future, please do not mark significant contributions of content as minor, otherwise it appears as though you're trying to mislead other editors even though the addition of bytes tells a different story. For what a minor edit is, please see Help:Minor edit. Thanks. Ss112 10:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Thanks. I’ll definitely makes sure that my minor edits are indeed minor edits. Kanyfug (talk) 17:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Маргарита Бабовникова (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awards tables

Just as a note (if you didn't see my ping), please make sure when you create a new entry in an awards table (such as for Normani) that you follow the formatting and style of the other rows. The easiest thing to do is just copy/paste a similar row and then modify it. Primefac (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks I’ll do that from now on Kanyfug (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Normani Hamilton, May 2019.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Normani Hamilton, May 2019.jpeg, which you've attributed to No acceptable evidence of permission was received by OTRS. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kanyfug

Thank you for creating Diamonds (Megan Thee Stallion & Normani song).

User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This is nowhere close to being ready for mainspace. Please edit the draft and submit it for review when ready. Admins: Feel free to speedily delete the redirect at any time.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Nkon21. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ariana Grande without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 18:53, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t remove anything I added more content and you removing it is cause for an editing war which is forbidden on Wikipedia. The information I added was just confirmed by billboard check the citation. Kanyfug (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, actions of Nkon21 are not war editing. --Dignitee (talk) 12:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hi there, I thought I'd just say, don't waste your time with that Cornerpickerstone account. They hate Normani, Beyonce, Nicki Minaj etc and praise artists who hate them such as Lil Kim, Missy Elliott. They like making their pages seem bad and not influential. Just look at his talk page everyone hates him and whoever they are will get their karma one day.

They have serious WP:OWN issues and edit pages based on their bias.

Maxwell King 123321 00:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m glad to know I’m not the only one having these issues with them. This isn’t my first time having a disagreement with them but this time they’re just being completely irrational. Kanyfug (talk) 01:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like something they'd do. I think its also mainly because no one has tried to file a complaint against them so they think they are 'in the right' and their personal bias against celebrities should be 'reflected in their work. Hopefully someone gives them their karma. Maxwell King 123321 22:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Can't Take My Eyes Off You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 500 Greatest Albums of All Time.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, Transparent Soul, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 21:11, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lauryn Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rosalía.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Side (Normani song)

Please explain edits like this when you make them. I don't see any reason for you to change a perfectly functional template to a manual citation, and as I pointed out—there is a template for the UK R&B singles chart, which requires a date=, which means it will show the peak beyond next week. If you're linking to a chart, always try to find the site's function (if it has one) to provide a date for the URL. The base chart URL you provided, https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/official-hip-hop-and-r-and-b-singles-chart/, will update next week and no longer show "Wild Side" at number 16, whereas https://www.officialcharts.com/charts/r-and-b-singles-chart/20210723/114/ will. Thanks. Ss112 17:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the error after but you had already corrected it. Thank you for letting me know. I’ve been editing for awhile but I’m still learning. Kanyfug (talk) 17:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lost Ones (Lauryn Hill song)

Hello, Kanyfug. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lost Ones (Lauryn Hill song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Side

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wild Side (Normani song), you may be blocked from editing. "Pop pills now we Shanghai!"^{(talk to me!~)} 10:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I continue or if you continue? Yeah I’ll go to the administrators and they can decide. I’m not doing this with you. Kanyfug (talk) 11:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

rfc

Hello Kanyfug, just to invite you to leave a comment / vote on this discussion Talk:Cardi_B#RfC. best regards. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Megan Thee Stallion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for André Leon Talley

On 20 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article André Leon Talley, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles to incorrect titles

As I said in my move summary, in future, request a move at WP:RM/TR or file a move request like Jax 0677 did on the talk page. We do not move articles to something "similar" to the title like the same name but with a lower-case letter. You know the correct capitalisation was Muni Long but there was a redirect in the way. That means you should be asking to have it moved if you can't overwrite it yourself or starting a move request if it seems uncontroversial. Please avoid doing this again. Ss112 10:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks Kanyfug (talk) 11:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 16:19, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice! I’ll do so moving forward. Kanyfug (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive WP:POINT editing. Thank you. As you were involved with the editor (User:Cornerstonepicker) your comments would likely be relevant in the situation, to give another person's perspective on the matter. shanghai.^{talk to me} 16:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lauryn Hill

Hello! Your contributions are Lauryn Hill are pretty good and of quality, however, I would just like to remind you that MOS:LEAD helpfully suggests that leads should be no more than four paragraphs- I think a mild trim of the lead would improve the quality of the article. Thank you and have a nice day! shanghai^{talk (they/them)} 06:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the part about the singles becoming hits and having popular music videos? Piotr Jr. (talk) 07:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to organize and shorten that section to make it an easier read. I figured "three hit singles" would hold enough weight. Kanyfug (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore it tho? Unless it's not verified in the source, I don't see how the music videos, which are marketing tactics in and of themselves, don't hold any significance in a section directly related to an album's marketing. Piotr Jr. (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on my phone and can't sort out in your revisions the text's new placement. Piotr Jr. (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, CeCe Winans, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was updating as I watched the telecast as most people do. I always add references. However the Grammys don’t update their wins right away and most of the citations that are available right now are live updates which usually take awhile before publications release a full winners list. I very much planned to add references once they were available. Kanyfug (talk) 01:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FH on best selling girlgroups

Hi there, i would like you to stop adding FH with the so claimed "21 million" sales to the list of best selling girlgroups, i'm going to explain you why, the sources are completely unreliable and do not follow wikipedia's notability rules, the first source states that the group have sold 21M copies only the United States, the list is called "best selling girlgroups Worldwide", the second source is a copy of what wikipedia states, and that was your edition which is completely disruptive and misleading, there's still no reliable claming "FH 21M records sold" anywhere, once its proven the opposite, for now there's one reliable source confirming a "33 million" claim so is the one most accurate to add to the list, cheers and please know that wikipedia editors are here to improve articles, help each other, and to protect pages from vandalism or disruptive edition, i recommend you to stop doing it or you will get banned.

There's nothing wrong or something to do of not being an american source is that it doesn't state anywhere in the article what you want to provide here, it clearly says "21 million in the United States" the list is called "Best selling girlgroups Worlwide" is not accurate plus The Things source is a copy of what wikipedia says. Moonlight Entm (talk) 22:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Offset (rapper), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Offset (rapper), you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over unsourced content never ends well. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

user:Magnolia677 I didn’t provide citations because there’s plenty of citations within the article that already have the information I added to the lead section. I simply added info to the lead because there was barely any. If you believe there needs to be more citations add at the end of the sentence that there needs to be a more reliable citation Kanyfug (talk) 16:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information is sourced. You never state what wasn’t sourced you are just completely removing my entire edit. You would be the reason for this becoming an edit war Kanyfug (talk) 16:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Must be my mistake. I get "pinged" every time a link is added to an article I created, and you added "Kodak Black" to the article. Where is the source to support that? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll add a source for that one. I’m not a fan of his... but he’s a key part in offset's solo career. Since that song is his highest charting solo song Kanyfug (talk) 17:11, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New to You (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offset.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kyle Denis

Hello, Kanyfug, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username IndyNotes, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kyle Denis, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Denis.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|IndyNotes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

IndyNotes (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New to You (Song)

Hello, Kanyfug. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New to You (Song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:New to You (Song)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:New to You (Song), was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken reference

In this edit, the final reference you added was seriously malformed. Can you please explain how this happened? Did other edits you made include these incorrect citations? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:07, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Twinkie Clark

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Twinkie Clark, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]